Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Thou mayest not eat within thy gates the tithe of thy corn, or of thy wine, or of thy oil, or the firstlings of thy herds or of thy flock, nor any of thy vows which thou vowest, nor thy freewill offerings, or heave offering of thine hand:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thou mayest H3201 not eat H398 within thy gates H8179 the tithe H4643 of thy corn H1715, or of thy wine H8492, or of thy oil H3323, or the firstlings H1062 of thy herds H1241 or of thy flock H6629, nor any of thy vows H5088 which thou vowest H5087, nor thy freewill offerings H5071, or heave offering H8641 of thine hand H3027:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"You are not to eat on your own property the tenth of your grain, new wine or olive oil [that you set aside for ADONAI], or the firstborn of your cattle or sheep, or any offering you have vowed, or your voluntary offering, or the offering from your hand.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Within your gates you must not eat the tithe of your grain or new wine or oil, the firstborn of your herds or flocks, any of the offerings that you have vowed to give, or your freewill offerings or special gifts.
Ask
American Standard Version
Thou mayest not eat within thy gates the tithe of thy grain, or of thy new wine, or of thine oil, or the firstlings of thy herd or of thy flock, nor any of thy vows which thou vowest, nor thy freewill-offerings, nor the heave-offering of thy hand;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You may not eat within your gates the tithe of your grain, or of your new wine, or of your oil, or the firstborn of your herd or of your flock, nor any of your vows which you vow, nor your freewill offerings, nor the wave offering of your hand;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thou maist nor eat within thy gates the tithe of thy corne, nor of thy wine, nor of thine oyle, nor the first borne of thy kine, nor of thy sheep, neither any of thy vowes which thou vowest, nor thy free offerings, nor the offering of thine hands,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
thou art not able to eat within thy gates the tithe of thy corn, and of thy new wine, and thine oil, and the firstlings of thy herd and of thy flock, and any of thy vows which thou vowest, and thy free-will offerings, and heave-offering of thy hand;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 12:17 establishes a strict prohibition for the Israelites regarding the consumption of specific consecrated items—namely, the tithe of their grain, wine, and oil, the firstborn of their herds and flocks, and various forms of offerings such as vows, freewill offerings, and heave offerings. This divine command explicitly forbids eating these sacred portions within their local towns or "gates," thereby mandating that they be brought exclusively to the central sanctuary chosen by God. This regulation served to underscore the holiness of these gifts, reinforce the centralization of true worship, prevent syncretism with pagan practices, and provide a tangible expression of Israel's covenant fidelity and profound reverence for the Lord.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 12:17 is situated within a crucial legislative section of Deuteronomy (chapters 12-26) that outlines the statutes and ordinances Israel was to faithfully observe upon entering the Promised Land. Chapter 12 specifically introduces and meticulously elaborates on the revolutionary command for the centralization of worship. Prior to this, in earlier periods of Israel's history, altars could be erected and sacrifices offered in various locations, as seen with figures like Abraham building an altar at Shechem (Genesis 12:7). However, to safeguard against the pervasive syncretism with Canaanite idolatry and to ensure the purity and unity of Israel's devotion to Yahweh, God unequivocally commanded that all major sacrifices, offerings, and festivals be brought exclusively to "the place which the LORD your God shall choose out of all your tribes to put his name there" (Deuteronomy 12:5). Verse 17 serves as a concrete and explicit application of this overarching principle, detailing specific categories of items—tithes, firstlings, vows, freewill offerings, and heave offerings—that must be presented and, where applicable, consumed at this central sanctuary, rather than being treated as common food or offered at local, unauthorized sites. This prohibition reinforces the sanctity of these gifts and the exclusivity of the designated worship center.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The injunction in Deuteronomy 12:17 arose as Israel stood on the precipice of a monumental transition from a nomadic existence in the wilderness to a settled life in the agriculturally rich land of Canaan. This transition presented formidable spiritual challenges, primarily the pervasive idolatry and polytheism of the Canaanite inhabitants, who worshipped at numerous local high places, sacred groves, and altars (Deuteronomy 12:2-4). The command for the centralization of worship was a radical departure from the common ancient Near Eastern practice of polytheism, which typically involved multiple local shrines dedicated to various deities. By requiring all major sacred offerings to be brought to a single, divinely chosen location, God strategically aimed to safeguard Israel's unique monotheistic faith, prevent the insidious adoption of pagan rituals, and foster national unity centered around a shared, pure worship experience. The specific items enumerated in the verse—agricultural produce (grain, wine, oil) and livestock (firstlings)—were the primary forms of wealth and sustenance in an agrarian society. In Israelite theology, this bounty was understood as a direct and gracious gift from Yahweh, thus necessitating a dedicated portion to be returned to Him in expressions of thanksgiving, obedience, and dependence.
  • Key Themes: Deuteronomy 12:17 profoundly contributes to several foundational themes woven throughout the book of Deuteronomy. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the Centralization of Worship, which is the dominant and revolutionary theme of Deuteronomy 12. The explicit prohibition against eating these items "within thy gates" directly reinforces the divine command that Israel's corporate devotion to God should be expressed at a single, holy site chosen by Him, thereby ensuring doctrinal uniformity, preventing syncretism, and maintaining the purity of Yahweh worship. Secondly, the verse highlights the Sacredness of Offerings. The enumerated items (tithes, firstlings, vows, freewill offerings, heave offerings) were not considered ordinary food but were consecrated and set apart for God. Their restricted consumption underscored their holy nature and the profound reverence due to the Lord, representing a portion specifically designated for God, His priests, and communal feasts celebrated in His presence at the sanctuary (Deuteronomy 14:22-26). Thirdly, this command emphasizes Obedience and Reverence. It required significant effort, time, and commitment to travel to the central place, thereby demonstrating a heart genuinely devoted to the Lord and His specific instructions. This act of pilgrimage and adherence to divine law served as a tangible test and expression of Israel's fidelity to the covenant.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • mayest not eat (Hebrew, ʼâkal', H398): From the root H398, meaning "to eat (literally or figuratively); [idiom] at all, burn up, consume, devour(-er, up), dine, eat(-er, up), feed (with), food, [idiom] freely, [idiom] in...wise(-deed, plenty), (lay) meat, [idiom] quite." In this context, the negative command "mayest not eat" (לֹא תֹאכַל) signifies an absolute prohibition against the consumption of the specified sacred items in unauthorized locations. It emphasizes that these consecrated portions are not for common, unrestricted use, but are set apart for specific, divinely ordained purposes at the central sanctuary.
  • gates (Hebrew, shaʻar', H8179): Meaning "an opening, i.e. door or gate; city, door, gate, port ([idiom] -er)." The phrase "within thy gates" (בִּשְׁעָרֶיךָ) is a common idiom in Deuteronomy referring to one's local town, city, or dwelling place, as opposed to the singular, divinely chosen central sanctuary. This term highlights the geographical restriction, indicating that the sacred offerings must not be consumed in any ordinary, local setting but only at the designated holy site.
  • firstlings (Hebrew, bᵉkôwrâh', H1062): Meaning "the firstling of man or beast; abstractly primogeniture; birthright, firstborn(-ling)." This refers specifically to the firstborn male animals of clean herds and flocks. These were considered inherently holy to the Lord from birth and were to be offered as a sacrifice, with the meat typically consumed by the offerer and his family in a sacred meal at the central sanctuary. Their unique status as the "first" represented a prime portion dedicated to God.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Thou mayest not eat within thy gates": This foundational prohibition immediately establishes the core command, explicitly forbidding the consumption of the subsequent list of items in one's local town, village, or home. The phrase "within thy gates" functions as a comprehensive geographical exclusion, signifying any location outside the divinely designated central sanctuary. This command underscores the exclusive nature and sanctity of the central worship site.
  • "the tithe of thy corn, or of thy wine, or of thy oil": This clause specifies the primary agricultural products from which a tenth portion (the tithe) was to be set apart. These were the staples of the Israelite diet and economy, representing the essential produce of the land. The prohibition means that these specific tithes, particularly the "second tithe" designated for communal feasting, could not be consumed at home but had to be brought to the central sanctuary for a celebratory meal in God's presence.
  • "or the firstlings of thy herds or of thy flock": This refers to the firstborn male animals of clean herds (cattle) and flocks (sheep or goats), which were consecrated to the Lord. Unlike ordinary meat, these animals could not be slaughtered and eaten casually at home. They were required to be brought to the central sanctuary for sacrifice, with the meat subsequently consumed by the offerer and his family, often in conjunction with the priests, as part of a sacred meal.
  • "nor any of thy vows which thou vowest": This clause addresses offerings made as a fulfillment of a voluntary promise or pledge made to God. The specific nature of the vow could vary (e.g., a promise to offer a specific animal or amount), but the offering associated with it had to be presented and, if applicable, consumed at the central sanctuary, not locally, emphasizing the binding and sacred nature of such commitments.
  • "nor thy freewill offerings": These were voluntary gifts given to God out of spontaneous devotion, gratitude, or a desire to honor Him, not as a fulfillment of a prior vow. Often taking the form of peace offerings, these offerings, like vows, had to be brought to the central sanctuary for proper presentation and communal feasting, highlighting the importance of intentional and public expression of devotion.
  • "or heave offering of thine hand": A "heave offering" (or "contribution") was a portion "lifted up" or set aside from a larger offering, often designated for the priests or for the tabernacle/temple service. While some heave offerings (e.g., priestly portions) were consumed by priests in their own towns, this phrase in Deuteronomy 12:17 likely refers to those portions that were part of offerings (like peace offerings) that required presentation at the central place and were shared by the offerer and priests, emphasizing that even these priestly portions were subject to the centralization rule when part of a larger, sanctuary-bound offering.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 12:17 is structured using several effective literary devices to convey its crucial command. Primarily, it employs Prohibition ("Thou mayest not eat") to establish a clear, absolute boundary for Israelite worship, immediately followed by a comprehensive Enumeration of the specific categories of sacred items that fall under this restriction. The direct and unambiguous negative command leaves no room for misinterpretation regarding the consecrated status of these offerings. The subsequent detailed list of "the tithe of thy corn, or of thy wine, or of thy oil, or the firstlings of thy herds or of thy flock, nor any of thy vows which thou vowest, nor thy freewill offerings, or heave offering of thine hand" functions as a precise Inventory, ensuring that the Israelites understood the full scope of the command. The repeated use of the negative conjunction "nor" throughout this list creates a strong sense of Emphasis and Exclusivity, underscoring the absolute nature of the prohibition for each distinct category of offering and reinforcing the singular importance of the central sanctuary. This Specificity in listing leaves no ambiguity about what is considered sacred and where it must be presented.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 12:17 stands as a foundational text for comprehending the Old Covenant's profound emphasis on consecrated worship and the critical distinction between the sacred and the common. The underlying theological principle is that God is inherently holy, and consequently, anything dedicated to Him must be treated with the utmost reverence and according to His precisely prescribed order. By centralizing the consumption of these offerings, God was not merely imposing a logistical or ceremonial rule; rather, He was fundamentally shaping Israel's theology of worship. This command taught them that true devotion was not a casual or convenient affair but demanded intentionality, significant effort, and unwavering adherence to divine instruction. The act of bringing offerings to a single, chosen place fostered a deep sense of national unity and a shared identity, firmly rooted in their covenant relationship with Yahweh, which stood in stark contrast to the fragmented, idolatrous worship prevalent among surrounding nations. Furthermore, this practice served as a tangible and recurring demonstration of their absolute dependence on God for all provision and blessing.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 12:17, while specifically addressing the ceremonial laws of the Old Covenant, offers profound and enduring principles for contemporary believers regarding our approach to God and our stewardship of resources. The command to bring sacred offerings to a central, designated place powerfully underscores the timeless importance of intentional, corporate worship and the setting apart of our very best for God. It challenges us to critically examine whether we treat our spiritual lives, our financial giving, and our use of time with the reverence due to a holy God, or if we casually integrate them into our everyday routines without proper distinction or intentionality. Just as the Israelites undertook a physical journey to the sanctuary, we are called to embark on a spiritual journey of prioritizing God in all areas of our lives, recognizing that genuine worship demands effort, sacrifice, and obedience. Our giving, whether of finances, time, or talents, should be understood not merely as a transaction but as a profound act of worship, reflecting a heart that acknowledges God as the ultimate provider and sovereign over all that we possess. This verse compels us to consider how our actions demonstrate our reverence for the sacred and our commitment to God's prescribed ways.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I, like the Israelites, inadvertently treat what is sacred to God as common or merely convenient?
  • What "offerings" (e.g., time, talent, treasure, attention) am I called to bring to God today, and am I doing so with intentionality, reverence, and a spirit of true worship?
  • How does my participation in corporate worship and my personal devotional life reflect the principle of setting apart specific time, place, and resources for God?
  • What practical steps can I take to more fully prioritize God's holiness and sovereignty in my daily life, distinguishing the sacred from the secular?

FAQ

Why was it so important for the Israelites to bring these specific offerings to a central place instead of consuming them at home?

Answer: The command in Deuteronomy 12 for a single, central place of worship was of paramount importance for several interconnected reasons. Firstly, it served as a crucial safeguard against idolatry and syncretism. If sacrifices and offerings could be made anywhere, the Israelites would be highly susceptible to adopting the pagan practices of the Canaanites, who worshipped at numerous local shrines, often associated with fertility cults and abhorrent rituals. Centralization ensured that worship was directed solely to Yahweh, according to His specific, pure instructions. Secondly, it powerfully fostered national unity and a shared identity. Gathering at one designated location for major feasts and the presentation of offerings created a profound communal experience that bound the disparate tribes together under a common faith and allegiance to their covenant God. Thirdly, it underscored the inherent holiness of God and the sacredness of the offerings themselves. By requiring a significant journey, adherence to specific rituals, and presentation at a divinely designated holy site, it profoundly taught the people that worship was not a casual or convenient affair but demanded reverence, intentional effort, and absolute obedience to divine command. This strict regulation clearly distinguished the sacred items from common food, emphasizing their dedication exclusively to God and His purposes.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 12:17, with its stringent emphasis on bringing specific offerings to a central, divinely chosen sanctuary, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The entire Old Testament system of offerings, tithes, and a centralized place of worship served as a prophetic shadow, pointing forward to the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. Believers in the New Covenant are no longer required to bring physical tithes of grain, wine, oil, or firstlings of animals to a physical temple, for Christ Himself is the ultimate Temple, whose body was destroyed and raised in three days (John 2:19-21), and the Great High Priest who has entered the true, heavenly sanctuary, not with the blood of goats and calves but with His own blood, thus securing eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:11-12). The "vows" and "freewill offerings" of the Old Covenant are now spiritually fulfilled in the believer's living sacrifice of their entire life—their bodies, minds, and wills—to God, as a spiritual act of worship (Romans 12:1). Our worship is no longer confined to a specific geographical location, for Jesus declared that true worshipers would worship the Father "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24), wherever believers gather or as individuals commune with God. Thus, the rigid requirements of Deuteronomy 12:17, while historically significant, beautifully illuminate the glorious reality that in Christ, the barriers of physical location and ceremonial law are broken down, and direct, personal, and eternal access to God is granted through His completed redemptive work on the cross.

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 12 verses 5–32

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

There is not any one particular precept (as I remember) in all the law of Moses so largely pressed and inculcated as this, by which they are all tied to bring their sacrifices to that one altar which was set up in the court of the tabernacle, and there to perform all the rituals of their religion; for, as to moral services, then, no doubt, as now, men might pray every where, as they did in their synagogues. The command to do this, and the prohibition of the contrary, are here repeated again and again, as we teach children: and yet we are sure that there is in scripture no vain repetition; but all this stress is laid upon it, 1. Because of the strange proneness there was in the hearts of the people to idolatry and superstition, and the danger of their being seduced by the many temptations which they would be surrounded with. 2. Because of the great use which the observance of this appointment would be of to them, both to prevent the introducing of corrupt customs into their worship and to preserve among them unity and brotherly love, that, meeting all in one place, they might continue both of one way and of one heart. 3. Because of the significancy of this appointment. They must keep to one place, in token of their belief of those two great truths, which we find together (Ti1 2:5), That there is one God, and one Mediator between God and man. It not only served to keep up the notion of the unity of the Godhead, but was an intimation to them (though they could not stedfastly discern it) of the one only way of approach to God and communion with him, in and by the Messiah.

Let us now reduce this long charge to its proper heads.

I. It is here promised that when they were settled in Canaan, when they had rest from their enemies, and dwelt in safety, God would choose a certain place, which he would appoint to be the centre of their unity, to which they should bring all their offerings, Deu 12:10, Deu 12:11. Observe, 1. If they just be tied to one place, they should not be left in doubt concerning it, but should certainly know what place it was. Had Christ intended, under the gospel, to make any one place such a seat of power as Rome pretends to be, we should not have been left so destitute of instruction as we are concerning the appointed place. 2. God does not leave it to them to choose the place, lest the tribes should have quarrelled about it, each striving, for their secular advantage, to have it among them; but he reserves the choice to himself, as he does the designation of the Redeemer and the institution of holy ordinances. 3. He does not appoint the place now, as he had appointed mounts Gerizim and Ebal, for the pronouncing of the blessings and curses (Deu 11:29), but reserves the doing of it till hereafter, that hereby they might be made to expect further directions from heaven, and a divine conduct, after Moses should be removed. The place which God would choose is said to be the place where he would put his name, that is, which he would have to be called his, where his honour should dwell, where he would manifest himself to his people, and make himself known, as men do by their names, and where he would receive addresses, by which his name is both praised and called upon. It was to be his habitation, where, as King of Israel, he would keep court, and be found by all those that reverently sought him. The ark was the token of God's presence, and where that was put there God put his name, and that was his habitation. It contained the tables of the law; for none must expect to receive favours from God's hand but those that are willing to receive the law from his mouth. The place which God first chose for the ark to reside in was Shiloh; and, after that place had sinned away its honours, we find the ark at Kirjath-jearim and other places; but at length, in David's time, it was fixed at Jerusalem, and God said concerning Solomon's temple, more expressly than ever he had said concerning any other place, This I have chosen for a house of sacrifice, Ch2 7:12. Compare Ch2 6:5. Now, under the gospel, we have no temple that sanctifies the gold, no altar that sanctifies the gift, but Christ only; and, as to the places of worship, the prophets foretold that in every place the spiritual incense should be offered, Mal 1:11. And our Saviour has declared that those are accepted as true worshippers who worship God in sincerity and truth, without regard either to this mountain or Jerusalem, Joh 4:23.

II. They are commanded to bring all their burnt-offerings and sacrifices to this place that God would choose (Deu 12:6 and again Deu 12:11): Thither shall you bring all that I command you; and (Deu 12:14), There thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings; and (Deu 12:27), The flesh and the blood must be offered upon the altar of the Lord thy God. And of their peace-offerings, here called their sacrifices, though they were to eat the flesh, yet the blood was to be poured out upon the altar. By this they were taught that sacrifices and offerings God did not desire, nor accept, for their own sake, nor for any intrinsic worth in them, as natural expressions of homage and adoration; but that they received their virtue purely from that altar on which they were offered, as it typified Christ; whereas prayers and praises, as much more necessary and valuable, were to be offered every day by the people of God wherever they were. A devout Israelite might honour God, and keep up communion with him, and obtain mercy from him, though he had not an opportunity, perhaps, for many months together, of bringing a sacrifice to his altar. But this signified the obligation we Christians are under to offer up all our spiritual sacrifices to God in the name of Jesus Christ, hoping for acceptance only upon the score of his mediation, Pe1 2:5.

III. They are commanded to feast upon their hallowed things before the Lord, with holy joy. They must not only bring to the altar the sacrifices which were to be offered to God, but hey must bring to the place of the altar all those things which they were appointed by the law to eat and drink, to the honour of God, in token of their communion with him, Deu 12:6. Their, tithes, and heave-offerings of their hand, that is, their first-fruits, their vows, and free-will-offerings, and firstlings, all those things which were to be religiously made use of either by themselves or by the priests and Levites, must be brought to the place which God would choose; as all the revenues of the crown, from all parts of the kingdom, are brought into the exchequer. And (Deu 12:7): There you shall eat before the Lord, and rejoice in all that you put your hands unto; and again (Deu 12:12), You shall rejoice before the Lord, you, and your sons, and your daughters. Observe here, 1. That what we do in the service of God and to his glory redounds to our benefit, if it be not our own fault. Those that sacrifice to God are welcome to eat before him, and to feast upon their sacrifices: he sups with us, and we with him, Rev 3:20. If we glorify God, we edify ourselves, and cultivate our own minds, through the grace of God, by the increase of our knowledge and faith, the enlivening of devout affections, and the confirming of gracious habits and resolutions: thus is the soul nourished. 2. That work for God should be done with holy joy and cheerfulness. You shall eat and rejoice, Deu 12:7, and again, Deu 12:12 and Deu 12:18. (1.) Now while they were before the Lord they must rejoice, Deu 12:12. It is the will of God that we should serve him with gladness; none displeased him more than those that covered his altar with tears. Mal 2:13. See what a good Master we serve, who has made it our duty to sing at our work. Even the children and servants must rejoice with them before God, that the services of religion might be a pleasure to them, and not a task or drudgery. (2.) They must carry away with them the grateful relish of that delight which they found in communion with God; they must rejoice in all that they put their hands unto, Deu 12:7. Some of the comfort which they must take with them into their common employments; and, being thus strengthened in soul, whatever they did they must do it heartily and cheerfully. And this holy pious joy in God and his goodness, with which we are to rejoice evermore, would be the best preservative against the sin and snare of vain and carnal mirth and a relief against the sorrows of the world.

IV. They are commanded to be kind to the Levites. Did they feast with joy? The Levites must feast with them, and rejoice with them, Deu 12:12, and again, Deu 12:18; and a general caution (Deu 12:19), Take heed that thou forsake not the Levite as long as thou livest. There were Levites that attended the altar as assistants to the priests, and these must not be forsaken, that is, the service they performed must be constantly adhered to; no other altar must be set up than that which God appointed; for that would be to forsake the Levites. But this seems to be spoken of the Levites that were dispersed in the country to instruct the people in the law of God, and to assist them in their devotions; for it is the Levite within their gates that they are here commanded to make much of. It is a great mercy to have Levites near us, within our gates, that we may ask the law at their mouth, and at our feasts to be a check upon us, to restrain excesses. And it is the duty of people to be kind to their ministers that give them good instructions and set them good examples. As long as we live we shall need their assistance, till we come to that world where ordinances will be superseded; and therefore as long as we live we must not forsake the Levites. The reason given (Deu 12:12) is because the Levite has no part nor inheritance with you, so that he cannot grow rich by husbandry or trade; let him therefore share with you in the comfort of your riches. They must give the Levites their tithes and offerings, settled on them by the law, because they had no other maintenance.

V. They are allowed to eat common flesh, but not the flesh of their offerings, in their own houses, wherever they dwelt. What was any way devoted to God they must not eat at home, Deu 12:13, Deu 12:17. But what was not so devoted they might kill and eat of at their pleasure, Deu 12:15. And this permission is again repeated, Deu 12:20-22. It should seem that while they were in the wilderness they did not eat the flesh of any of those kinds of beasts that were used in sacrifice, but what was killed at the door of the tabernacle, and part of it presented to God as a peace-offering, Lev 17:3, Lev 17:4. But when they came to Canaan, where they must live at a great distance from the tabernacle, they might kill what they pleased for their own use of their flocks and herds, without bringing part to the altar. This allowance is very express, and repeated, lest Satan should take occasion from that law which forbade the eating of their sacrifices at their own houses to suggest to them, as he did to our first parents, hard thoughts of God, as if he grudged them: Thou mayest eat whatsoever thy soul lusteth after. There is a natural regular appetite, which it is lawful to gratify with temperance and sobriety, not taking too great a pleasure in the gratification, nor being uneasy if it be crossed. The unclean, who might not eat of the holy things, yet might eat of the same sort of flesh when it was only used as common food. The distinction between clean persons and unclean was sacred, and designed for the preserving of the honour of their holy feasts, and therefore must not be brought into their ordinary meals. This permission has a double restriction: - 1. They must eat according to the blessing which God had given them, Deu 12:15. Note, It is not only our wisdom, but our duty, to live according to our estates, and not to spend above what we have. As it is unjust on the one hand to hoard what should be laid out, so it is much more unjust to lay out more than we have; for what is not our own must needs be another's, who is thereby robbed and defrauded. And this, I say, is much more unjust, because it is easier afterwards to distribute what has been unduly spared, and so to make a sort of restitution for the wrong, than it is to repay to wife, and children, and creditors, what has been unduly spent. Between these two extremes let wisdom find the mean, and then let watchfulness and resolution keep it. 2. They must not eat blood (Deu 12:16, and again, Deu 12:23): Only be sure that thou eat not the blood (Deu 12:24), Thou shalt not eat it; and (Deu 12:25), Thou shalt not eat it, that it may go well with thee. When they could not bring the blood to the altar, to pour it out there before the Lord, as belonging to him, they must pour it out upon the earth, as not belonging to them, because it was the life, and therefore, as an acknowledgment, belonged to him who gives life, and, as an atonement, belonged to him to whom life is forfeited. Bishop Patrick thinks one reason why they were forbidden thus strictly the eating of blood was to prevent the superstitions of the old idolaters about the blood of their sacrifices, which they thought their demons delighted in, and by eating of which they imagined that they had communion with them.

VI. They are forbidden to keep up either their own corrupt usages in the wilderness or the corrupt usages of their predecessors in the land of Canaan.

1.They must not keep up those improper customs which they had got into in the wilderness, and which were connived at in consideration of the present unsettledness of their condition (Deu 12:8, Deu 12:9): You shall not do after all the things that we do here this day. Never was there a better governor than Moses, and one would think never a better opportunity of keeping up good order and discipline than now among the people of Israel, when they lay so closely encamped under the eye of their governor; and yet it seems there was much amiss and many irregularities had crept in among them. We must never expect to see any society perfectly pure and right, and as it should be till we come to the heavenly Canaan. They had sacrifices and religious worship, courts of justice and civil government, and, by the stoning of the man that gathered sticks on the sabbath day, it appears there was great strictness used in guarding the most weighty matters of the law; but being frequently upon the remove, and always at uncertainty, (1.) They could none of them observe the solemn feasts, and the rites of cleansing, with the exactness that the law required. And, (2.) Those among them that were disposed to do amiss had opportunity given them to do it unobserved by the frequent interruptions which their removals gave to the administration of justice. But (says Moses) when you come to Canaan, you shall not do as we do here. Note, When the people of God are in an unsettled condition, that may be tolerated and dispensed with which would by no means be allowed at another time. Cases of necessity are to be considered while the necessity continues; but that must not be done in Canaan which was done in the wilderness. While a house is in the building a great deal of dirt and rubbish are suffered to lie by it, which must all be taken away when the house is built. Moses was now about to lay down his life and government, and it was a comfort to him to foresee that Israel would be better in the next reign than they had been in his.

2.They must not worship the Lord by any of those rites or ceremonies which the notions of Canaan had made use of in the service of their gods, Deu 12:29-32. They must not so much as enquire into the modes and forms of idolatrous worship. What good would it do to them to know those depths of Satan? Rev 2:24. It is best to be ignorant of that which there is danger of being infected by. They must not introduce the customs of idolaters, (1.) Because it would be absurd to make those their patterns whom God had made their slaves and captives, cut off, and destroyed from before them. The Canaanites had not flourished and prospered so much in the service of their gods as that the Israelites should be invited to take up their customs. Those are wretchedly besotted indeed who will walk in the way of sinners, after they have seen their end. (2.) Because some of their customs were most barbarous and inhuman, and such as trampled, not only upon the light and law of nature, but upon natural affection itself, as burning their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods (Deu 12:31), the very mention of which is sufficient to make it odious, and possess us with a horror of it. (3.) Because their idolatrous customs were an abomination to the Lord, and the translating of them into his worship would make even that an abomination and an affront to him by which they should give him honour, and by which they hoped to obtain his favour. The case is bad indeed when the sacrifice itself has become an abomination, Pro 15:8. He therefore concludes (Deu 12:32) with the same caution concerning the worship of God which he had before given concerning the word of God (Deu 4:2): "You shall not add thereto any inventions of your own, under pretence of making the ordinance either more significant or more magnificent, nor diminish from it, under pretence of making it more easy and practicable, or of setting aside that which may be spared; but observe to do all that, and that only, which God has commanded." We may then hope in our religious worship to obtain the divine acceptance when we observe the divine appointment. God will have his own work done in his own way.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 12:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.