Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And ye murmured in your tents, and said, Because the LORD hated us, he hath brought us forth out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And ye murmured H7279 in your tents H168, and said H559, Because the LORD H3068 hated H8135 us, he hath brought us forth H3318 out of the land H776 of Egypt H4714, to deliver H5414 us into the hand H3027 of the Amorites H567, to destroy H8045 us.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and in your tents you complained, 'It's because ADONAI hated us that he has brought us out of the land of Egypt, only to hand us over to the Emori to destroy us.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
You grumbled in your tents and said, “Because the LORD hates us, He has brought us out of the land of Egypt to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites to be annihilated.
Ask
American Standard Version
and ye murmured in your tents, and said, Because Jehovah hated us, he hath brought us forth out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You murmured in your tents, and said, “Because the LORD hated us, he has brought us out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And murmured in your tentes, and sayd, Because the Lord hated vs, therefore hath hee brought vs out of the land of Egypt, to deliuer vs into the hand of the Amorites, and to destroy vs.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and murmur in your tents, and say, In Jehovah's hating us He hath brought us out of the land of Egypt, to give us into the hand of the Amorite--to destroy us;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Deuteronomy 1:27 vividly recounts Israel's profound rebellion at Kadesh-barnea, a pivotal moment of fear and unbelief following the spies' report. Gripped by a distorted perception, the people murmured in their tents, accusing the LORD of malevolent intent—that He had led them out of Egypt only to hand them over to the Amorites for destruction because He "hated" them. This egregious accusation not only revealed a deep-seated distrust in God's covenant love and power but also marked a tragic turning point, sealing that generation's fate to perish in the wilderness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Deuteronomy 1:27 is situated within Moses' opening address to the new generation of Israelites, delivered on the plains of Moab as they stand poised to enter the Promised Land. This address, spanning Deuteronomy 1-4, functions as a retrospective sermon, meticulously recounting the forty years of wilderness wandering. Moses' purpose is didactic and hortatory: to remind this new generation of God's unwavering faithfulness despite their ancestors' repeated failures, particularly the defining moment at Kadesh-barnea (recounted in Deuteronomy 1:19-46). This specific verse recalls the people's faithless response to the spies' report, highlighting their fear and unbelief that ultimately prevented them from entering Canaan, thereby setting the stage for the subsequent divine judgment and the prolonged wilderness journey. Moses' recounting serves as both a historical lesson to avoid past mistakes and a powerful exhortation for the new generation to learn from history and obey God's commands.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events recounted in Deuteronomy 1:27 occurred approximately 40 years prior, at Kadesh-barnea, a crucial oasis and staging ground on the southern border of Canaan. The "Amorites" were one of the formidable, well-established Canaanite tribes inhabiting the land, renowned for their strength and fortified cities (as described in the spies' report in Numbers 13:28-33). In the ancient Near Eastern cultural milieu, murmuring or rebellion against a divine king or a divinely appointed leader was not merely an expression of discontent but a grave act of insubordination, often viewed as treason against the divine order and punishable by severe consequences. The accusation that "the LORD hated us" is particularly blasphemous, as it directly contradicted the foundational narrative of the Exodus, where God's electing love, covenant faithfulness, and miraculous power were unequivocally demonstrated through their deliverance from Egyptian bondage (Deuteronomy 7:7-8). This generation, having witnessed God's mighty acts firsthand, still harbored a profound slave mentality and a deep-seated lack of faith, tragically preferring the perceived security of their past bondage to the challenges of inheriting God's promised future.
  • Key Themes: Deuteronomy 1:27 powerfully encapsulates several key themes central to the book of Deuteronomy and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it starkly illustrates the theme of unbelief and rebellion, demonstrating how a profound lack of faith in God's promises and power inevitably leads to direct disobedience against His commands, as seen in Israel's outright refusal to advance into the land (Numbers 14:1-4). Secondly, the verse highlights the pervasive theme of misunderstanding God's character, as the people falsely accuse the LORD of hatred despite His consistent and overwhelming demonstration of covenant love and unwavering faithfulness in delivering them from Egypt and sustaining them miraculously in the wilderness. This reveals a profound spiritual blindness and a failure to discern God's true nature. Finally, the verse serves as a potent illustration of the consequences of disobedience, as this specific act of murmuring and rebellion at Kadesh-barnea directly resulted in God's solemn judgment that the entire generation of fighting men, save Joshua and Caleb, would not enter the Promised Land, leading to the prolonged forty years of wandering (Numbers 14:34-35).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Murmured (Hebrew, râgan', H7279): This primitive root means "to grumble, i.e. rebel; murmur." Frequently appearing in the wilderness narratives (e.g., Exodus 15:24), it denotes a deep-seated grumbling, complaining, or lodging a protest, often directed against God or His appointed leaders. It signifies a profound spiritual discontent, a lack of trust in divine provision and guidance, and reveals a heart that is not at rest in God's sovereignty.
  • Brought us forth (Hebrew, yâtsâʼ', H3318): This primitive root means "to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively, direct and proxim." In this context, it refers to God's act of leading Israel out of Egypt. The people acknowledge God's past action but immediately twist its purpose, implying that His initial act of liberation was merely a prelude to their ultimate destruction, rather than a step towards the fulfillment of His promises.
  • Destroy (Hebrew, shâmad', H8045): This primitive root means "to desolate; destroy(-uction), bring to nought, overthrow, perish, pluck down, [idiom] utterly." The Israelites' accusation that God intended to "destroy" them by delivering them to the Amorites is an extreme and unfounded claim. It reveals their conviction that God's plan was malevolent, rather than a pathway to the fulfillment of His promises, demonstrating a complete lack of faith in His protective power and ultimate good intentions.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And ye murmured in your tents": This phrase vividly portrays the private yet widespread nature of their discontent. The "tents" signify their communal living spaces, suggesting that the murmuring was not merely individual complaints but a collective, pervasive attitude of grumbling that spread throughout the entire camp. It implies a deep-seated dissatisfaction and lack of faith that permeated the community, fostering an environment ripe for rebellion.
  • "and said, Because the LORD hated us": This is the core of their accusation and reveals the profound depth of their spiritual blindness and theological error. Despite God's miraculous deliverance from Egypt, His covenant love, and His constant provision, they attributed His actions to malevolent hatred. This statement is a shocking misinterpretation of God's divine guidance and purposes, viewed through the distorted lens of their own fear and unbelief.
  • "he hath brought us forth out of the land of Egypt": This clause acknowledges God's past act of salvation, the Exodus, but immediately reinterprets it with a negative, conspiratorial twist. They recognized God's powerful hand in their liberation but twisted its purpose, implying that His initial act of bringing them out of slavery was merely a deceptive prelude to their ultimate demise, rather than a step towards inheriting the Promised Land.
  • "to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us": This final part of their accusation articulates their perceived ultimate fate and the malevolent intent they ascribed to God. They believed God's intention was to hand them over to their formidable enemies, the Amorites, specifically for annihilation. This demonstrates a complete failure to trust God's power over their adversaries and His covenant promise to give them the land, revealing a profound fear that overshadowed any memory of His past faithfulness and protective care.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 1:27 employs several potent literary devices that amplify its message. There is striking Irony in the Israelites' accusation: God, who had demonstrated unparalleled love, power, and faithfulness in delivering them from slavery, is accused of hatred and malicious intent. This stands in stark contrast to His revealed character and consistent actions throughout the Exodus. The phrase "Because the LORD hated us... to destroy us" also functions as Hyperbole, an extreme exaggeration of their perceived plight and God's intentions. Their fear and despair amplify their claims, leading them to articulate an utterly unfounded and over-the-top accusation about God's character. Furthermore, the attribution of human emotion like "hate" to God, especially in such a negative and accusatory way, is a form of Anthropomorphism, revealing not God's actual emotion but the people's deeply distorted and fearful perception of Him. The entire verse is also part of a larger pattern of Repetition of the theme of murmuring and rebellion throughout the wilderness narrative, emphasizing Israel's persistent struggle with faith and obedience, and serving as a cautionary tale for the new generation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Deuteronomy 1:27 serves as a stark and enduring reminder of the destructive power of unbelief and the profound danger of misinterpreting God's character and intentions. The Israelites' accusation that God "hated" them, despite His demonstrable love and unwavering faithfulness in the Exodus and wilderness provision, highlights a recurring human tendency to project our fears, anxieties, and distrust onto God, rather than resting in His sovereign goodness and wisdom. This verse underscores the critical importance of faith as the proper and necessary response to God's commands and promises, and it powerfully reveals how a lack of faith can lead to devastating consequences, not only in terms of missed blessings and delayed promises but also in a fundamentally distorted relationship with the divine. It teaches us that true spiritual maturity involves trusting God's heart and His ultimate good purposes, even when circumstances are daunting or His path seems difficult and counter-intuitive to our limited understanding.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Deuteronomy 1:27 offers a timeless and profound warning against the insidious nature of unbelief and the pervasive temptation to succumb to fear when faced with daunting challenges or seemingly insurmountable obstacles. It challenges us to deeply examine our own hearts: do we, like the Israelites, sometimes fall into the trap of accusing God of malicious intent, indifference, or a lack of care when our circumstances are difficult, or when His path for us seems arduous and beyond our immediate comprehension? This verse calls us to actively cultivate a deep-seated and unwavering trust in God's unchanging love, His perfect wisdom, and His sovereign control, even when His ways are mysterious or His timing seems delayed. It reminds us that our perception of God is often tragically shaped by our fears, anxieties, and limited human perspective, rather than by the unchanging truth of His revealed character in Scripture. To combat this destructive tendency, we must actively remember His past faithfulness in our lives and in history, cling tenaciously to His unfailing promises, and diligently guard against the murmuring spirit that can poison our relationship with Him and ultimately prevent us from entering into the "promised lands" of blessing, peace, and purpose that He has prepared for us.

Questions for Reflection

  • When faced with daunting challenges or difficult commands, do I tend to murmur and accuse God, or do I seek to understand His purposes and trust His character?
  • How do my personal fears and anxieties sometimes distort my perception of God's love, wisdom, and intentions for my life and circumstances?
  • What specific promises of God can I cling to and meditate upon when circumstances tempt me to doubt His goodness and faithfulness?
  • In what areas of my life might I currently be resisting God's leading or failing to step out in faith, perhaps due to a lack of trust similar to Israel at Kadesh-barnea?

FAQ

Why did Israel accuse God of hating them, despite His deliverance from Egypt?

Answer: Israel's accusation that "the LORD hated us" (Deuteronomy 1:27) stemmed from a profound and tragic combination of fear, unbelief, and a distorted perception of God's character. Despite having personally witnessed God's miraculous power in the Exodus from Egypt and His continuous, supernatural provision in the wilderness for over a year, they allowed the daunting report of the Amorites' strength and fortified cities (Numbers 13:28-29) to completely overshadow their memory of God's faithfulness and His covenant promises. Their overwhelming fear led them to interpret God's command to enter the land not as an act of love leading to blessing and the fulfillment of His promise, but as a malevolent trap designed for their destruction. This accusation reveals a deep spiritual blindness and a profound ingratitude, where their present discomfort and perceived danger outweighed all overwhelming evidence of God's covenant love and benevolent intentions (Deuteronomy 7:7-8).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Deuteronomy 1:27, with its poignant portrayal of Israel's unbelief and rebellion against God's loving intentions, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the stark contrast between the old covenant's failure and the new covenant's triumph. The wilderness generation's tragic inability to enter the Promised Land due to their hardened hearts and blasphemous accusation against God's love foreshadows humanity's inherent inability to inherit God's eternal promises through self-effort, a spirit of rebellion, or a lack of faith. However, Jesus Christ, the true and faithful Israelite, perfectly embodies the obedience and unwavering trust that the first generation lacked. He did not murmur against the Father's will, even when faced with the ultimate "Amorites" of sin, suffering, and death (cf. His prayer in Luke 22:42). Through His perfect obedience, His sacrificial death on the cross, and His glorious resurrection, Jesus delivers us not to destruction but from it, ushering us into the true spiritual Promised Land—eternal life and reconciled communion with God (John 3:16). He is the greater Joshua who leads His people into true rest (Hebrews 4:8-10), not through a wilderness of murmuring and judgment, but by grace through faith in His finished work. Jesus forever dispels the lie that God "hates" us, for He demonstrated His boundless love by giving His only Son as a propitiation for our sins (Romans 5:8).

Copy as

Commentary on Deuteronomy 1 verses 19–46

Moses here makes a large rehearsal of the fatal turn which was given to their affairs by their own sins, and God's wrath, when, from the very borders of Canaan, the honour of conquering it, and the pleasure of possessing it, the whole generation was hurried back into the wilderness, and their carcases fell there. It was a memorable story; we read it Num. 13 and 14, but divers circumstances are found here which are not related there.

I. He reminds them of their march from Horeb to Kadesh-barnea (Deu 1:19), through that great and terrible wilderness. This he takes notice of, 1. To make them sensible of the great goodness of God to them, in guiding them through so great a wilderness, and protecting them from the mischiefs they were surrounded with in such a terrible wilderness. The remembrance of our dangers should make us thankful for our deliverances. 2. To aggravate the folly of those who, in their discontent, would have gone back to Egypt through the wilderness, though they had forfeited, and had no reason to expect, the divine guidance, in such a retrograde motion.

II. He shows them how fair they stood for Canaan at that time, Deu 1:20, Deu 1:21. He told them with triumph, the land is set before you, go up and possess it. He lets them see how near they were to a happy settlement when they put a bar in their own door, that their sin might appear the more exceedingly sinful. It will aggravate the eternal ruin of hypocrites that they were not far from the kingdom of God and yet came short, Mar 12:34.

III. He lays the blame of sending the spies upon them, which did not appear in Numbers, there it is said (Deu 13:1, Deu 13:2) that the Lord directed the sending of them, but here we find that the people first desired it, and God, in permitting it, gave them up to their counsels: You said, We will send men before us, Deu 1:22. Moses had given them God's word (Deu 1:20, Deu 1:21), but they could not find in their hearts to rely upon that: human policy goes further with them than divine wisdom, and they will needs light a candle to the sun. As if it were not enough that they were sure of a God before them, they must send men before them.

IV. He repeats the report which the spies brought of the goodness of the land which they were sent to survey, Deu 1:24, Deu 1:25. The blessings which God has promised are truly valuable and desirable, even the unbelievers themselves being judges: never any looked into the holy land, but they must own it a good land. Yet they represented the difficulties of conquering it as insuperable (Deu 1:28); as if it were in vain to think of attacking them either by battle, "for the people are taller than we," or by siege, "for the cities are walled up to heaven," an hyperbole which they made use of to serve their ill purpose, which was to dishearten the people, and perhaps they intended to reflect on the God of heaven himself, as if they were able to defy him, like the Babel-builders, the top of whose tower must reach to heaven, Gen 11:4. Those places only are walled up to heaven that are compassed with God's favour as with a shield.

V. He tells them what pains he took with them to encourage them, when their brethren had said so much to discourage them (Deu 1:29): Then I said unto you, Dread not. Moses suggested enough to have stilled the tumult, and to have kept them with their faces towards Canaan. He assured them that God was present with them, and president among them, and would certainly fight for them, Deu 1:30. And for proof of his power over their enemies he refers them to what they had seen done in Egypt, where their enemies had all possible advantages against them and yet were humbled and forced to yield, Deu 1:30. And for proof of God's goodwill to them, and the real kindness which he intended them, he refers them to what they had seen in the wilderness (Deu 1:31, Deu 1:33), through which they had been guided by the eye of divine wisdom in a pillar of cloud and fire (which guided both their motions and their rests), and had been carried in the arms of divine grace with as much care and tenderness as were ever shown to any child borne in the arms of a nursing father. And was there any room left to distrust this God? Or were they not the most ungrateful people in the world, who, after such sensible proofs of the divine goodness, hardened their hearts in the day of temptation? Moses had complained once that God had charged him to carry this people as a nursing father doth the sucking child (Num 11:12); but here he owns that it was God that so carried them, and perhaps this is alluded to (Act 13:18), where he is said to bear them, or to suffer their manners.

VI. He charges them with the sin which they were guilty of upon this occasion. Though those to whom he was now speaking were a new generation, yet he lays it upon them: You rebelled, and you murmured; for many of these were then in being, though under twenty years old, and perhaps were engaged in the riot; and the rest inherited their fathers' vices, and smarted for them. Observe what he lays to their charge. 1. Disobedience and rebellion against God's law: You would not go up, but rebelled, Deu 1:26. The rejecting of God's favours is really a rebelling against his authority. 2. Invidious reflections upon God's goodness. They basely suggested: Because the Lord hated us, he brought us out of Egypt, Deu 1:27. What could have been more absurd, more disingenuous, and more reproachful to God? 3. An unbelieving heart at the bottom of all this: You did not believe the Lord your God, Deu 1:32. All your disobedience to God's laws, and distrust of his power and goodness, flow from a disbelief of his word. A sad pass it has come to with us when the God of eternal truth cannot be believed.

VII. He repeats the sentence passed upon them for this sin, which now they had seen the execution of. 1. They were all condemned to die in the wilderness, and none of them must be suffered to enter Canaan except Caleb and Joshua, Deu 1:34-38. So long they must continue in their wanderings in the wilderness that most of them would drop off of course, and the youngest of them should be cut off. Thus they could not enter in because of unbelief. It was not the breach of any of the commands of the law that shut them out of Canaan, no, not the golden calf, but their disbelief of that promise which was typical of gospel grace, to signify that no sin will ruin us but unbelief, which is a sin against the remedy. 2. Moses himself afterwards fell under God's displeasure for a hasty word which they provoked him to speak: The Lord was angry with me for your sakes, Deu 1:37. Because all the old stock must go off, Moses himself must not stay behind. Their unbelief let death into the camp, and, having entered, even Moses falls within his commission. 3. Yet here is mercy mixed with wrath. (1.) That, though Moses might not bring them into Canaan, Joshua should (v. 38): Encourage him; for he would be discouraged from taking up a government which he saw Moses himself fall under the weight of; but let him be assured that he shall accomplish that for which he is raised up: He shall cause Israel to inherit it. Thus what the law could not do, in that it was weak, Jesus, our Joshua, does by bringing in the better hope. (2.) That, though this generation should not enter into Canaan, the next should, Deu 1:39. As they had been chosen for their fathers' sakes, so their children might justly have been rejected for their sakes. But mercy rejoiceth against judgement.

VIII. He reminds them of their foolish and fruitless attempt to get this sentence reversed when it was too late. 1. They tried it by their reformation in this particular; whereas they had refused to go up against the Canaanites, now they would go up, aye, that they would, in all haste, and they girded on their weapons of war for that purpose, Deu 1:41. Thus, when the door is shut, and the day of grace is over, there will be found those that stand without and knock. But this, which looked like a reformation, proved but a further rebellion. God, by Moses, prohibited the attempt (Deu 1:42): yet they went presumptuously up to the hill (Deu 1:43), acting now in contempt of the threatening, as before in contempt of the promise, as if they were governed by a spirit of contradiction; and it sped accordingly (Deu 1:44): they were chased and destroyed; and, by this defeat which they suffered when they provoked God to leave them, they were taught what success they might have had if they had kept themselves in his love. 2. They tried by their prayers and tears to get the sentence reversed: They returned and wept before the Lord, Deu 1:45. While they were fretting and quarrelling, it is said (Num 14:1): They wept that night; those were tears of rebellion against God, these were tears of repentance and humiliation before God. Note, Tears of discontent must be wept over again; the sorrow of the world worketh death, and is to be repented of; it is not so with godly sorrow, that will end in joy. But their weeping was all to no purpose. The Lord would not harken to your voice, because you would not harken to his; the decree had gone forth, and, like Esau, they found no place of repentance, though they sought it carefully with tears.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 19–46. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 1:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.