Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Men G444 that have hazarded G3860 their G846 lives G5590 for G5228 the name G3686 of our G2257 Lord G2962 Jesus G2424 Christ G5547.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
who have dedicated their lives to upholding the name of our Lord, Yeshua the Messiah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Ask
American Standard Version
men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Yeshua the Messiah.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Men that haue giuen vp their liues for the Name of our Lord Iesus Christ.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
men who have given up their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ--
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Acts 11:27-30, Acts 15:22-35, Acts 15:36-40
Acts 11:27-30, Acts 15:22-35, Acts 15:36-40 View full PDF
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1)
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1) View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,469 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 15:26 serves as a powerful commendation from the Jerusalem Council, affirming the unwavering commitment and profound personal sacrifice of Paul and Barnabas. This verse, embedded within a pivotal letter to the Gentile churches, highlights their willingness to face extreme peril and even death for the sake of proclaiming the Gospel and upholding the authority and character embodied in the name of Jesus Christ, thereby validating their ministry and the Council's decision regarding Gentile inclusion.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Acts 15:26 is found within the letter drafted by the Jerusalem Council, addressed to the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria, and Cilicia. This letter, delivered by Judas (Barsabbas) and Silas, serves as the official resolution to the contentious debate regarding the necessity of circumcision and adherence to the Mosaic Law for Gentile converts. The verse specifically refers to Paul and Barnabas, who had just returned from their first missionary journey, having witnessed an outpouring of the Holy Spirit among Gentiles. The Council's endorsement of these men as those who "hazarded their lives" lends immense credibility to their ministry and the Council's decision, effectively silencing the dissenting voices of the "certain men from Judea" who were troubling the Gentile churches (Acts 15:1-5). The immediate verses (Acts 15:22-29) detail the Council's decision-making process, the selection of messengers, and the content of the letter, making this verse a crucial part of the validation of the apostles' work and the unity of the early church.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The early church was grappling with its identity as it expanded beyond its Jewish roots. The question of whether Gentile converts needed to become Jewish proselytes (including circumcision and adherence to dietary laws) before becoming Christians was a major point of contention. This issue threatened to divide the nascent Christian movement. The historical backdrop includes the Roman Empire's relative peace (Pax Romana), which facilitated travel, but also the inherent dangers of missionary journeys, including persecution from both Jewish and Roman authorities, brigands, and natural perils. The cultural understanding of "name" (Greek ónoma) in the ancient world carried significant weight, representing a person's character, authority, and reputation. To "hazard one's life for the name" was understood as an ultimate act of loyalty and devotion, indicating that Paul and Barnabas were not merely risking their lives for a cause, but for the very person and authority of Jesus Christ.

  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Acts and the broader New Testament. Firstly, it underscores the theme of self-sacrifice and courage in the face of immense opposition, a hallmark of apostolic ministry as seen throughout Paul's missionary accounts (e.g., Acts 14:19-20). Secondly, it highlights devotion to Christ's Lordship and authority, emphasizing that the apostles' actions were not for personal glory but "for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ," signifying their complete allegiance to Him. This aligns with the broader theme of Christ's supremacy and the call to live for His glory (Philippians 1:20-21). Thirdly, the verse plays into the theme of apostolic validation and unity, as the Jerusalem Council's endorsement of Paul and Barnabas's perilous ministry served to affirm their divine calling and foster unity between Jewish and Gentile believers within the expanding Christian community (Acts 15:22-29).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hazarded (Greek, paradídōmi', G3860): Meaning "to surrender, i.e. yield up, intrust, transmit." In this context, it powerfully conveys the idea of Paul and Barnabas willingly "delivering up" or "handing over" their lives, putting them in extreme peril. It implies a profound indifference to personal safety in pursuit of their divine calling, demonstrating a radical commitment.
  • Lives (Greek, psychḗ', G5590): Referring to "breath, i.e. (by implication) spirit, abstractly or concretely (the animal sentient principle only; thus distinguished on the one hand from πνεῦμα, which is the rational and immortal soul; and on the other from ζωή, which is mere vitality, even of plants)." Here, it refers to their very physical existence and vitality, emphasizing that they risked their earthly lives.
  • Name (Greek, ónoma', G3686): Meaning a "name" (literally or figuratively) representing "authority, character." In biblical thought, a "name" is far more than a label; it encapsulates the essence, authority, and reputation of the person. To act "for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" means to act for His honor, under His authority, and in accordance with His character and mission.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Men that have hazarded their lives": This clause refers specifically to Paul and Barnabas, as indicated by the preceding context of the letter from the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:25). The phrase "hazarded their lives" (KJV) translates a Greek idiom that signifies putting one's life in extreme danger or delivering it up to peril. It is a strong affirmation of their courage and the immense personal risk they undertook during their missionary journeys, facing beatings, imprisonments, and attempts on their lives (e.g., Acts 14:5, Acts 14:19).
  • "for the name": This prepositional phrase clarifies the ultimate motivation and purpose behind their perilous actions. "The name" of Christ is a comprehensive biblical concept, representing His entire person, authority, character, and redemptive work. It signifies that their self-endangerment was not for personal gain, fame, or any earthly cause, but solely for the honor, spread, and establishment of Jesus Christ's reign and message.
  • "of our Lord Jesus Christ": This full title emphasizes the supreme authority and identity of the one for whom they risked everything. "Lord" (G2962, kýrios) denotes His sovereignty and mastery. "Jesus" (G2424, Iēsoûs) identifies Him as the historical Messiah of Israel. "Christ" (G5547, Christós) confirms His anointing as the promised Savior. The inclusion of "our" (G2257, hēmōn) highlights the personal and communal relationship believers have with Him, making their sacrifice a deeply personal act of devotion to their shared Master.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Commendation and Eulogy, serving as a formal declaration of praise and honor for Paul and Barnabas by the Jerusalem Council. This commendation is not merely descriptive but Performative, as it aims to validate their ministry and establish their credibility among the Gentile churches. The phrase "hazarded their lives" uses Figurative Language, specifically Hyperbole, to emphasize the extreme danger and self-sacrificial nature of their work, rather than implying they literally died and were resurrected. Furthermore, "the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" is an example of Metonymy, where "name" stands in for the entire person, authority, and character of Jesus Christ, underscoring that their devotion was to Him fully and completely.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 15:26 profoundly connects to the biblical theology of costly discipleship and the supremacy of Christ's mission. It illustrates that genuine faith often demands significant personal sacrifice, even to the point of risking one's life. The apostles' willingness to "hazard their lives" for the "name" of Jesus underscores that the Christian mission is not merely an intellectual pursuit or a social program, but a radical commitment to a living Lord whose authority and glory are paramount. This selfless devotion serves as a foundational example for all believers, demonstrating that the advancement of the Gospel and the honor of Christ's name should supersede personal comfort, safety, or gain. The Council's recognition of this sacrifice also highlights the importance of affirming and supporting those who faithfully bear witness, especially in the face of adversity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 15:26 challenges contemporary believers to examine the depth of their commitment to Christ and His mission. While few may be called to face the same physical perils as Paul and Barnabas, the principle of "hazarding our lives" for Christ's name remains profoundly relevant. This can manifest as risking social standing for unpopular truths, sacrificing financial security for vocational ministry, enduring criticism for ethical stands, or prioritizing evangelism over personal comfort. It calls us to a radical discipleship where our lives are not our own, but are surrendered to the Lordship of Jesus. This verse encourages a spirit of selfless service, bold witness, and unwavering trust in God's sovereignty, even when the path ahead is fraught with opposition or discomfort. It prompts us to consider what we truly value and whether our actions reflect a genuine willingness to lay down our lives—in whatever form that may take—for the advancement of His kingdom and the glory of His name.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what practical ways can I "hazard my life" for the name of Jesus Christ in my current circumstances?
  • What comforts, reputations, or resources am I unwilling to risk for the sake of the Gospel? How might God be calling me to greater surrender?
  • How does my daily life demonstrate my devotion to the "name of our Lord Jesus Christ" as the ultimate authority and purpose?

FAQ

Who are the "men" referred to in Acts 15:26?

Answer: The "men" explicitly referred to in Acts 15:26 are the apostles Paul and Barnabas. This is made clear in the preceding verse, Acts 15:25, where the Jerusalem Council states, "it seemed good to us, having come to one accord, to send chosen men to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul." The letter itself serves to validate their ministry and confirm the Council's decision regarding Gentile converts, emphasizing the immense personal cost and danger they faced while spreading the Gospel among the Gentiles during their first missionary journey (Acts 13-14).

What does it mean to "hazard their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ"?

Answer: To "hazard their lives" means to put their lives in extreme peril or to deliver them up to danger, demonstrating a profound willingness to face persecution, suffering, and even death. The Greek word translated "hazarded" (paradídōmi) implies a handing over or surrendering of one's life. Doing so "for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ" signifies that their motivation was entirely for the honor, authority, and character of Jesus Christ. It was not for personal gain or glory, but for the advancement of His kingdom and the proclamation of His message. This phrase powerfully conveys their complete devotion and the radical nature of their commitment to Christ, as evidenced by the numerous trials and tribulations they endured (e.g., Acts 14:19, 2 Corinthians 11:23-27).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 15:26 finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment not only in Jesus as the object of Paul and Barnabas's devotion but also as the supreme example of one who truly "hazarded His life." Jesus Himself perfectly embodied this sacrificial principle, willingly "delivering up" His life (the same Greek root, paradídōmi, is often used for His betrayal and surrender to death) for the sake of humanity's salvation. He did not merely risk His life; He laid it down completely, obediently humbling Himself even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8). His entire earthly ministry, culminating in His crucifixion and resurrection, was "for the name" of God the Father, bringing glory to Him and establishing His own sovereign authority (John 17:4). Thus, Paul and Barnabas's courageous acts are not just admirable human endeavors, but a direct reflection and participation in the self-sacrificial love of Christ, who calls His followers to take up their cross and follow Him (Matthew 16:24). Their willingness to suffer for His name is a testament to the transformative power of His own ultimate sacrifice, inspiring all believers to live lives surrendered to the One who gave His all for them (Romans 12:1).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 15 verses 22–35

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the result of the consultation that was held at Jerusalem about the imposing of the ceremonial law upon the Gentiles. Much more, it is likely, was said about it than is here recorded; but at length it was brought to a head, and the advice which James gave was universally approved and agreed to nemine contradicente - unanimously; and letters were accordingly sent by messengers of their own to the Gentile converts, acquainting them with their sentiments in this matter, which would be a great confirmation to them against the false teachers. Now observe here,

I. The choice of the delegates that were to be sent with Paul and Barnabas on this errand; not as if they had any suspicion of the fidelity of these great men, and could not trust them with their letters, nor as if they thought that those to whom they sent them would suspect them to have altered any thing in their letter; no, their charity thought no such evil concerning men of such tried integrity; but,

1.They thought fit to send men of their own company to Antioch, with Paul and Barnabas, Act 15:22. This was agreed to by the apostles and elders, with the whole church, who, it is likely, undertook to bear their charges, Co1 9:7. They sent these messengers, (1.) To show their respect to the church at Antioch, as a sister-church, though a younger sister, and that they looked upon it as upon the same level with them; as also that they were desirous further to know their state. (2.) To encourage Paul and Barnabas, and to make their journey home the more pleasant (for it is likely they travelled on foot) by sending such excellent men to bear them company; amicus pro vehiculo - a friend instead of a carriage. (3.) To put a reputation upon the letters they carried, that it might appear a solemn embassy, and so much the more regard might be paid to the message, which was likely to meet with opposition from some. (4.) To keep up the communion of the saints, and cultivate an acquaintance between churches and ministers that were at a distance from each other, and to show that, though they were many, yet they were one.

2.Those they sent were not inferior persons, who might serve to carry the letters, and attest the receipt of them from the apostles; but they were chosen men, and chief men among the brethren, men of eminent gifts, graces, and usefulness; for these are the things which denominate men chief among the brethren, and qualify them to be the messengers of the churches. They are here named: Judas, who was called Barsabas (probably the brother of that Joseph who was called Barsabas, that was a candidate for the apostleship, Act 1:23), and Silas. The character which these men had in the church at Jerusalem would have some influence upon those that came from Judea, as those false teachers did, and engage them to pay the more deference to the message that was sent by them.

II. The drawing up of the letters, circular letters, that were to be sent to the churches, to notify the sense of the synod in this matter.

1.Here is a very condescending obliging preamble to this decree, Act 15:23. There is nothing in it haughty or assuming, but, (1.) That which intimates the humility of the apostles, that they join the elders and brethren in commission with them, the ministers, the ordinary Christians, whom they had advised with in this case, as they used to do in other cases. Though never men were so qualified as they were for a monarchical power and authority in the church, nor had such a commission as they had, yet their decrees run not, "We, the apostles, Christ's vicars upon earth, and pastors of all the pastors of the churches" (as the pope styles himself), "and sole judges in all matters of faith;" but the apostles, and elders, and brethren, agree in their orders. Herein they remembered the instructions their Master gave them (Mat 23:8): Be not you called Rabbi; for you are all brethren. (2.) That which bespeaks their respect to the churches they wrote to; they send to them greeting, wish them health and happiness and joy, and call them brethren of the Gentiles, thereby owning their admission into the church, and giving them the right hand of fellowship: "You are our brethren, though Gentiles; for we meet in Christ, the first born among many brethren, in God our common Father." Now that the Gentiles are fellow-heirs and of the same body, they are to be countenanced and encouraged, and called brethren.

2.Here is a just and severe rebuke to the judaizing teachers (Act 15:24): "We have heard that certain who went out from us have troubled you with words, and we are very much concerned to hear it; now this is to let them know that those who preached this doctrine were false teachers, both as they produced a false commission and as they taught a false doctrine." (1.) They did a great deal of wrong to the apostles and ministers at Jerusalem, in pretending that they had instructions from them to impose the ceremonial law upon the Gentiles, when there was no colour for such a pretension. "They went out from us indeed - they were such as belonged to our church, of which, when they had a mind to travel, we gave them perhaps a testimonial; but, as for their urging the law of Moses upon you, we gave them no such commandment, nor had we ever thought of such a thing, nor given them the least occasion to use our names in it." It is no new thing for apostolical authority to be pleaded in defence of those doctrines and practices for which yet the apostles gave neither command nor encouragement. (2.) They did a great deal of wrong to the Gentile converts, in saying, You must be circumcised, and must keep the law. [1.] It perplexed them: "They have troubled you with words, have occasioned disturbance and disquietment to you. You depended upon those who told you, If you believe in the Lord Jesus Christ you shall be saved; and now you are startled by those that tell you you must keep the law of Moses or you cannot be saved, by which you see yourselves drawn into a snare. They trouble you with words - words, and nothing else - mere words - sound, but no substance." How has the church been troubled with words, by the pride of men that loved to hear themselves talk! [2.] It endangered them; they subverted their souls, put them into disorder, and pulled down that which had been built up. They took them off from pursuing pure Christianity, and minding the business of that, by filling their heads with the necessity of circumcision, and the law of Moses, which were nothing to the purpose.

3.Here is an honourable testimony given of the messengers by whom these letters were sent.

(1.)Of Paul and Barnabas, whom these judaizing teachers had opposed and censured as having done their work by the halves, because they had brought the Gentile converts to Christianity only, and not to Judaism. Let them say what they will of these men, [1.] "They are men that are dear to us; they are our beloved Barnabas and Paul - men whom we have a value for, a kindness for, a concern for." Sometimes it is good for those that are of eminence to express their esteem, not only for the despised truth of Christ, but for the despised preachers and defenders of that truth, to encourage them, and weaken the hands of their opposers. [2.] "They are men that have signalized themselves in the service of Christ, and therefore have deserved well of all the churches: they are men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ (Act 15:26), and therefore are worthy of double honour, and cannot be suspected of having sought any secular advantage to themselves; for they have ventured their all for Christ, have engaged in the most dangerous services, as good soldiers of Christ, and not only in laborious services." It is not likely that such faithful confessors should be unfaithful preachers. Those that urged circumcision did it to avoid persecution (Gal 6:12, Gal 6:13); those that opposed it knew they thereby exposed themselves to persecution; and which of these were most likely to be in the right?

(2.)Of Judas and Silas: "They are chosen men (Act 15:25), and they are men that have heard our debates, and are perfectly apprized of the matter, and will tell you the same things by mouth," Act 15:27. What is of use to us it is good to have both in writing and by word of mouth, that we may have the advantage both of reading and of hearing it. The apostles refer them to the bearers for a further account of their judgment and their reasons, and the bearers will refer them to their letters for the certainty of the determination.

4.Here is the direction given what to require from the Gentile converts, where observe,

(1.)The matter of the injunction, which is according to the advice given by James, that, to avoid giving offence to the Jews, [1.] They should never eat any thing that they knew had been offered in sacrifice to an idol, but look upon it as, though clean in itself, yet thereby polluted to them. This prohibition was afterwards in part taken off, for they were allowed to eat whatever was sold in the shambles, or set before them at their friend's table, though it had been offered to idols, except when there was danger of giving offence by it, that is, of giving occasion either to a weak Christian to think the worse of our Christianity, or to a wicked heathen to think the better of his idolatry; and in these cases it is good to forbear, Co1 10:25, etc. This to us is an antiquated case. [2.] That they should not eat blood, nor drink it; but avoid every thing that looked cruel and barbarous in that ceremony which had been of so long standing. [3.] That they should not eat any thing that was strangled, or died of itself, or had not the blood let out. [4.] That they should be very strict in censuring those that were guilty of fornication, or marrying within the degrees prohibited by the Levitical law, which, some think, is principally intended here. See Co1 5:1. Dr. Hammond states this matter thus: The judaizing teachers would have the Gentile converts submit to all that those submitted to whom they called the proselytes of righteousness, to be circumcised and keep the whole law; but the apostles required no more of them than what was required of the proselytes of the gate, which was to observe the seven precepts of the sons of Noah, which, he thinks, are here referred to. But the only ground of this decree being in complaisance to the rigid Jews that had embraced the Christian faith, and, except in that one case of scandal, all meats being pronounced free and indifferent to all Christians as soon as the reason of the decree ceased, which, at furthest, was after the destruction of Jerusalem, the obligation of it ceased likewise. "These things are in a particular manner offensive to the Jews, and therefore do not disoblige them herein for the present; in a little time the Jews will incorporate with the Gentiles, and then the danger is over."

(2.)The manner in which it is worded. [1.] They express themselves with something of authority, that what they wrote might be received with respect, and deference paid to it: It seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, that is, to us under the guidance of the Holy Ghost, and by direction from him: not only the apostles, but others, were endued with spiritual gifts extraordinary, and knew more of the mind of God than any since those gifts ceased can pretend to; their infallibility gave an incontestable authority to their decrees, and they would not order any thing because it seemed good to them, but that they knew it first seemed good to the Holy Ghost. Or it refers to what the Holy Ghost had determined in this matter formerly. When the Holy Ghost descended upon the apostles, he endued them with the gift of tongues, in order to their preaching the gospel to the Gentiles, which was a plain indication of God's purpose to call them in. When the Holy Ghost descended upon Cornelius and his friends, upon Peter's preaching, it was plain that Christ designed the taking down of the Jewish pale, within which they fancied the spirit had been enclosed. [2.] They express themselves with abundance of tenderness and fatherly concern. First, They are afraid of burdening them: We will lay upon you no greater burden. So far were they from delighting to impose upon them that they dreaded nothing so much as imposing too far upon them, so as to discourage them at their setting out. Secondly, They impose upon them no other than necessary things. "The avoiding of fornication is necessary to all Christians at all times; the avoiding of things strangled, and of blood, and of things offered to idols, is necessary at this time, for the keeping up of a good understanding between you and the Jews, and the preventing of offence;" and as long as it continues necessary for that end, and no longer, it is enjoined. Note, Church-rulers should impose only necessary things, things which Christ has made our duty, which have a real tendency to the edification of the church, and, as here, to the uniting of good Christians. If they impose things only to show their own authority, and to try people's obedience, they forget that they have not authority to make new laws, but only to see that the laws of Christ be duly executed, and to enforce the observance of them. Thirdly, They enforce their order with a commendation of those that shall comply with it, rather than with the condemnation of those that shall transgress it. They do not conclude, "From which if you do not keep yourselves, you shall be an anathema, you shall be cast out of the church, and accursed," according to the style of after-councils, and particularly that of Trent; but "From which if you keep yourselves, as we do not question but you will, you will do well; it will be for the glory of God, the furtherance of the gospel, the strengthening of the hands of your brethren, and your own credit and comfort." It is all sweetness and love and good humour, such as became the followers of him who, when he called us to take his yoke upon us, assured us we should find him meek and lowly in heart. The difference of the style of the true apostles from that of the false is very observable. Those that were for imposing the ceremonial laws were positive and imperious: Except you keep it, you cannot be saved (Act 15:1), you are excommunicated ipso facto - at once, and delivered to Satan. The apostles of Christ, who only recommend necessary things, are mild and gentle: "From which if you keep yourselves, you will do well, and as becomes you. Fare ye well; we are hearty well-wishers to your honour and peace."

III. The delivering of the letters, and how the messengers disposed of themselves.

1.When they were dismissed, had had their audience of leave of the apostles (it is probable that they were dismissed with prayer, and a solemn blessing in the name of the Lord, and with instructions and encouragements in their work), They then came to Antioch; they staid no longer at Jerusalem than till their business was done, and then came back, and perhaps were met at their return by those that brought them on their way at their setting out; for those that have taken pains in public service ought to be countenanced and encouraged.

2.As soon as they came to Antioch, they gathered the multitude together, and delivered the epistle to them (Act 15:30, Act 15:31), that they might all know what it was that was forbidden them, and might observe these orders, which would be no difficulty for them to do, most of them having been, before their conversion to Christ, proselytes of the gate, who had laid themselves under these restrictions already. But this was not all; it was that they might know that no more than this was forbidden them, that it was no longer a sin to eat swine's flesh, no longer a pollution to touch a grave or a dead body.

3.The people were wonderfully pleased with the orders that came from Jerusalem (Act 15:31): They rejoiced for the consolation; and a great consolation it was to the multitude, (1.) That they were confirmed in their freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law, and were not burdened with that, as those upstart teachers would have had them to be. It was a comfort to them to hear that the carnal ordinances were no longer imposed on them, which perplexed the conscience, but could not purify nor pacify it. (2.) That those who troubled their minds with an attempt to force circumcision upon them were hereby for the present silenced and put to confusion, the fraud of their pretensions to an apostolical warrant being now discovered. (3.) That the Gentiles were hereby encouraged to receive the gospel, and those that had received it to adhere to it. (4.) That the peace of the church was hereby restored, and that removed which threatened a division. All this was consolation which they rejoiced in, and blessed God for.

4.They got the strange ministers that came from Jerusalem to give them each a sermon, and more, Act 15:32. Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, endued with the Holy Ghost, and called to the work, and being likewise entrusted by the apostles to deliver some things relating to this matter by word of mouth, exhorted the brethren with many words, and confirmed them. Even those that had the constant preaching of Paul and Barnabas, yet were glad of the help of Judas and Silas; the diversity of the gifts of ministers is of use to the church. Observe what is the work of ministers with those that are in Christ. (1.) To confirm them, by bringing them to see more reason both for their faith in Christ and their obedience to him; to confirm their choice of Christ and their resolutions for Christ. (2.) To exhort them to perseverance, and to the particular duties required of them: to quicken them to that which is good, and direct them in it. They comforted the brethren (so it may be rendered), and this would contribute to the confirming of them; for the joy of the Lord will be our strength. They exhorted them with many words; they used a very great copiousness and variety of expression. One word would affect one, and another another; and therefore, though what they had to say might have been summed up in a few words, yet it was for the edification of the church that they used many words, dia logou pollou - with much speech, much reasoning; precept must be upon precept.

5.The dismission of the Jerusalem ministers, Act 15:33. When they had spent some time among them (so it might be read), poiēsantes chronon - having made some stay, and having made it to good purpose, not having trifled away time, but having filled it up, they were let go in peace from the brethren at Antioch, to the apostles at Jerusalem, with all possible expressions of kindness and respect; they thanked them for their coming and pains, and the good service they had done, wished them their health and a good journey home, and committed them to the custody of the peace of God.

6.The continuance of Silas, notwithstanding, together with Paul and Barnabas, at Antioch. (1.) Silas, when it came to the setting to, would not go back with Judas to Jerusalem, but let him go home by himself, and chose rather to abide still at Antioch, Act 15:34. And we have no reason at all to blame him for it, though we know not the reason that moved him to it. I am apt to think the congregations at Antioch were both more large and more lively than those at Jerusalem, and that this tempted him to stay there, and he did well: so did Judas, who, notwithstanding this, returned to his post of service at Jerusalem. (2.) Paul and Barnabas, though their work lay chiefly among the Gentiles, yet continued for some time in Antioch, being pleased with the society of the ministers and people there, which, it should seem by divers passages, was more than ordinarily inviting. They continued there, not to take their pleasure, but teaching and preaching the word of God. Antioch, being the chief city of Syria, it is probable there was a great resort of Gentiles thither from all parts upon one account or other, as there was of Jews to Jerusalem; so that in preaching there they did in effect preach to many nations, for they preached to those who would carry the report of what they preached to many nations, and thereby prepare them for the apostles' coming in person to preach to them. And thus they were not only not idle at Antioch, but were serving their main intention. (3.) There were many others also there, labouring at the same oar. The multitude of workmen in Christ's vineyard does not give us a writ of ease. Even where there are many others labouring in the word and doctrine, yet there may be opportunity for us; the zeal and usefulness of others should excite us, not lay us asleep.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–35. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 33
Then to show that they do not act despotically, that all are agreed in this, that with deliberation they write this - "It seemed good to us, being assembled with one accord, to send men of ours whom we have chosen" - then, that it may not look like disparagement of Paul and Barnabas, that those men are sent, observe the encomium passed upon them - "together with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ." If "beloved," they will not despise them, if they "have hazarded their lives," they have themselves a right to be believed. The encomium passed upon Paul stopped their mouths. For this is the reason why neither Paul comes alone nor Barnabas with him, but others also from the Church; that he may not be suspected, seeing it was he that advocated that doctrine: nor yet those from Jerusalem alone. It shows that they have a right to be believed.
BedeAD 735
Retractions on Acts
Who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. In the Greek is added: In every temptation.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 15:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.