Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Zadok therefore and Abiathar carried the ark of God again to Jerusalem: and they tarried there.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Zadok H6659 therefore and Abiathar H54 carried H7725 the ark H727 of God H430 again H7725 to Jerusalem H3389: and they tarried H3427 there.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
So Tzadok and Evyatar carried the ark of God back to Yerushalayim and stayed there.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So Zadok and Abiathar returned the ark of God to Jerusalem and stayed there.
Ask
American Standard Version
Zadok therefore and Abiathar carried the ark of God again to Jerusalem: and they abode there.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Zadok therefore and Abiathar carried the ark of God again to Jerusalem; and they stayed there.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Zadok therefore and Abiathar caried the Arke of God againe to Ierusalem, and they taried there.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Zadok taketh back--and Abiathar--the ark of God to Jerusalem, and they abide there.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,419 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

As Absalom's rebellion forces King David to flee Jerusalem, 2 Samuel 15:29 records the pivotal moment when the chief priests, Zadok and Abiathar, faithfully return the sacred Ark of God to the city, obeying David's command. This act underscores David's profound trust in God's sovereignty over human manipulation, signifying his submission to divine will rather than treating the Ark as a mere good-luck charm or political asset in his time of crisis. The verse highlights the Ark's enduring significance as the symbol of God's presence, even amidst the chaos of civil war, and the priests' essential role in preserving the sanctity of Israel's worship and serving their king.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse immediately follows King David's explicit instruction to Zadok and Abiathar in 2 Samuel 15:25-28. Earlier in the chapter, Absalom's cunning and charisma had successfully swayed the hearts of the people, culminating in a widespread rebellion that forced David to abandon Jerusalem and flee for his life, as chronicled in 2 Samuel 15:13-14. As David and his loyal followers departed, the Ark of the Covenant, the most sacred object in Israel, was initially carried with them by the Levites and priests. However, David, in a remarkable display of faith and humility, declared that the Ark should remain in Jerusalem. His reasoning was rooted in trust: if he found favor in the Lord's eyes, God would bring him back to see it and its dwelling place; if not, he would accept God's will, as articulated in 2 Samuel 15:25-26. Verse 2 Samuel 15:29 then records the immediate obedience of Zadok and Abiathar to this command, ensuring the Ark's return to its rightful place in the capital and setting the stage for their role as intelligence gatherers.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Ark of the Covenant was central to Israelite identity and worship, representing God's throne, His covenant presence, and His active leadership among His people, as detailed in Exodus 25:22. It had historically led Israel into battle, as seen in Numbers 10:33-36, but its power was not magical, as demonstrated by its capture by the Philistines when Israel treated it as a superstitious charm rather than a symbol of God's holy presence, vividly recounted in 1 Samuel 4:1-11. David's decision to send the Ark back to Jerusalem, rather than taking it with him for perceived divine protection, reflected a profound understanding of God's sovereignty that transcended mere ritualism. Culturally, the king's flight from his capital was a sign of profound weakness and vulnerability, yet David's action here demonstrated spiritual strength and a commitment to the proper reverence for sacred objects, even when his own life and throne were in jeopardy. Jerusalem, as the city David had established as the religious and political capital, was the appropriate dwelling place for the Ark, symbolizing God's continued presence with His people, regardless of the king's personal circumstances.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes in 2 Samuel and the broader Deuteronomistic History. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Trust. David's refusal to use the Ark as a talisman or political tool, instead entrusting his fate to God's will, highlights a deep reliance on divine providence over human manipulation. His statement, "If I find favor in the eyes of the Lord, he will bring me back..." found in 2 Samuel 15:25, is a testament to his understanding that his kingship was ultimately dependent on God's grace, not on the physical presence of the Ark. Secondly, the verse underscores The Role of the Priesthood in maintaining the sanctity of worship and divine order. Zadok and Abiathar, as chief priests, faithfully execute David's instruction, demonstrating their obedience and commitment to their sacred duties, even when it meant returning to a city under the control of a usurper. Finally, the return of the Ark reinforces the Symbol of God's Presence and the sanctity of Jerusalem. Despite David's temporary exile, the Ark's presence in Jerusalem affirmed that God's dwelling place remained with His people in the holy city, a constant reminder of His covenant faithfulness even in times of national crisis, echoing the enduring significance of the city as God's chosen place, as seen throughout Psalm 132.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Ark (Hebrew, ʾârôwn', H727): Refers to the Ark of the Covenant, the most sacred object in ancient Israel, representing God's throne and His covenant presence among His people. Its significance transcends a mere container; it was the physical locus of God's manifest glory and a constant reminder of His covenant relationship with Israel, particularly through the mercy seat above it, as described in Exodus 25:22. David's decision regarding the Ark underscores its unique theological weight, not as a magical charm but as a symbol of God's holy and sovereign presence.
  • Carried (Hebrew, shûwb', H7725): This verb, derived from the root shûwb, primarily means "to turn back" or "to bring back." In this context, it signifies the priests' act of physically transporting the Ark back to Jerusalem as commanded by David. The emphasis is on the reversal of its initial movement out of the city, highlighting the immediate and obedient execution of David's instruction, which was contrary to the natural inclination to keep a sacred object for perceived protection during flight.
  • Tarried (Hebrew, yâshab', H3427): From the root yâshab, meaning "to sit," "to dwell," or "to remain." Here, it indicates that Zadok and Abiathar, along with the Ark, remained in Jerusalem after returning it. This implies their continued presence and readiness to serve David as informants within the city, as instructed in 2 Samuel 15:27-28. Their "tarrying" was not passive waiting but an active, obedient fulfillment of their role in David's strategic plan, demonstrating their loyalty and trust.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Zadok therefore and Abiathar carried the ark of God again to Jerusalem:": This clause specifies the agents (Zadok and Abiathar, the chief priests) and their immediate action. The "therefore" connects this action directly to David's command in the preceding verses (2 Samuel 15:25-28). Their act of "carrying... again to Jerusalem" signifies their faithful obedience to David's instruction to return the Ark, reversing its initial movement out of the city with David. This highlights the priests' loyalty to David and, more importantly, their reverence for the Ark as "the ark of God," not a personal possession or a tactical asset.
  • "and they tarried there.": This concluding clause indicates that the priests, having returned the Ark to its proper place in Jerusalem, remained in the city. This "tarrying" was not merely a passive waiting but an active fulfillment of David's strategic directive for them to serve as intelligence gatherers within Absalom's camp (2 Samuel 15:27-28). It underscores their continued commitment to David's cause and their willingness to place themselves in a potentially dangerous situation for the sake of their king and, by extension, God's anointed.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. Symbolism is paramount, with the "ark of God" serving as the central symbol of God's presence, covenant, and sovereignty. Its return to Jerusalem, even as the king flees, symbolically asserts that God's dwelling place and authority remain fixed, regardless of human political upheaval. There is a strong element of Contrast between David's humility and trust in God's sovereignty, as evidenced by his decision to send the Ark back, and Absalom's ambitious, self-serving rebellion. David's action also demonstrates Irony; by seemingly relinquishing a powerful spiritual asset, he paradoxically displays greater faith and wisdom than if he had tried to manipulate God's presence for his own benefit. The narrative also uses Conciseness to deliver a powerful punch; the simple statement "and they tarried there" implies a deeper strategic purpose and the priests' unwavering loyalty, which is elaborated upon in the preceding verses, inviting the reader to recall the broader context.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This singular act of returning the Ark to Jerusalem, rather than retaining it as a purported source of protection, stands as a profound theological statement on the nature of faith and divine sovereignty. David's decision demonstrates a mature understanding that God is not a force to be manipulated or contained within a box, but a sovereign Lord whose presence is not contingent on human circumstances or geographical location. His trust in God's will, even if it meant accepting his own demise, elevates faith above superstition or instrumentalism. This act of humility and submission to God's ultimate authority serves as a powerful reminder that true spiritual security lies not in outward symbols or rituals, but in a deep, abiding reliance on the character and promises of God Himself. It underscores that God's presence is not a tool for human advantage, but a sacred reality to be revered and submitted to, a truth echoed throughout the biblical narrative.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In times of personal crisis or national upheaval, it is a natural human tendency to grasp for anything that might offer a sense of control or security, often even attempting to leverage spiritual symbols or practices for desired outcomes. David's action in 2 Samuel 15:29 offers a timeless and profound counter-example. He chose to release control of the most sacred object in Israel, placing his trust entirely in God's sovereign will, even if that meant accepting a future without his throne or his life. This teaches us that genuine faith is not about demanding God's intervention on our terms or using Him as a means to an end, but about submitting to His perfect wisdom and timing. Our security is not found in the symbols of our faith, but in the Person of God Himself, who remains faithful whether we are in prosperity or exile, on the throne or in flight. We are called to place our ultimate trust in God, allowing Him to orchestrate our circumstances according to His divine plan, knowing that His presence is always with us, even when we cannot perceive it or control it. This act of relinquishing control is often the most profound expression of our dependence and devotion.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life am I tempted to "grasp" for control or manipulate circumstances, rather than trusting God's sovereignty?
  • How does David's willingness to relinquish the Ark challenge my understanding of what true spiritual security means?
  • What does it look like to submit to God's will, even when the outcome is uncertain or potentially undesirable from a human perspective?

FAQ

Why did David send the Ark back to Jerusalem instead of keeping it with him for protection?

Answer: David's decision to send the Ark back was a profound act of faith and submission to God's sovereignty. He refused to treat the Ark as a good-luck charm or a magical object to guarantee his victory or safety. Instead, he understood that God's presence was not bound by the Ark's physical location, and his return to Jerusalem, if it happened, would be solely by God's grace and favor, not by manipulating a sacred object. His words in 2 Samuel 15:25-26 explicitly state his trust: "If I find favor in the eyes of the Lord, he will bring me back... But if he says, 'I have no pleasure in you,' then here I am, let him do to me what seems good to him." This demonstrated a mature theological understanding that God's will was paramount, and He was not to be used for human ends.

Who were Zadok and Abiathar, and what was their role?

Answer: Zadok and Abiathar were the two chief priests serving David at this time. Zadok was of the line of Eleazar, and Abiathar was of the line of Ithamar, both descendants of Aaron. Their role was to minister before the Lord, particularly in matters related to the Ark of the Covenant and the tabernacle worship. In this crisis, David also entrusted them with a strategic intelligence-gathering mission. He instructed them to return to Jerusalem and serve as his eyes and ears within Absalom's court, relaying information through their sons, as detailed in 2 Samuel 15:27-28. Their obedience in returning the Ark and "tarrying there" demonstrated their loyalty to David and their commitment to their priestly duties, even in a dangerous situation, highlighting their critical role in both spiritual and political spheres.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of David's humble submission and the return of the Ark to Jerusalem finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Ark, as the symbol of God's presence and the place where atonement was made, points forward to Jesus, who is the true and ultimate dwelling place of God among humanity. Just as David trusted in God's sovereign will rather than relying on a physical symbol, so too does our salvation rest entirely on God's sovereign plan, embodied in Christ, rather than on human effort or ritualistic adherence. Jesus is the Word made flesh, who "tabernacled" among us, the one in whom "the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily" (Colossians 2:9). He is the ultimate High Priest, not of the Aaronic line but of the order of Melchizedek, who entered the true heavenly sanctuary once for all, offering His own blood as the perfect sacrifice, far superior to the sacrifices made before the earthly Ark (Hebrews 9:11-14). David's temporary exile and hope of return foreshadow the greater "exile" of humanity from God's presence due to sin, and Christ's victorious death and resurrection as the means by which God brings His people back into His presence, ultimately establishing a new heaven and new earth where God's dwelling is with humanity forever. In Christ, the promise of God's presence, once symbolized by the Ark, is fully realized and eternally secured, demonstrating God's sovereign plan for redemption.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 15 verses 24–30

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here we have, I. The fidelity of the priests and Levites and their firm adherence to David and his interest. They knew David's great affection to them and their office, notwithstanding his failings. The method Absalom took to gain people's affections made no impression upon them; he had little religion in him, and therefore they steadily adhered to David. Zadok and Abiathar, and all the Levites, if he go, will accompany him, and take the ark with them, that, by it, they may ask counsel of God for him, Sa2 15:24. Note, Those that are friends to the ark in their prosperity will find it a friend to them in their adversity. Formerly David would not rest till he had found a resting-place for the ark; and now, if the priests may have their mind, the ark shall not rest till David return to his rest.

II. David's dismission of them back into the city, Sa2 15:25, Sa2 15:26. Abiathar was high priest (Kg1 2:35), but Zadok was his assistant, and attended the ark most closely, while Abiathar was active in public business, Sa2 15:24. Therefore David directs his speech to Zadok, and an excellent speech it is, and shows him to be in a very good frame under his affliction, and that still he holds fast his integrity. 1. He is very solicitous for the safety of the ark: "By all means carry the ark back into the city, let not that be unsettled and exposed with me, lodge that again in the tent pitched for it; surely Absalom, bad as he is, will do that no harm." David's heart, like Eli's trembles for the ark of God. Note, It argues a good principle to be more concerned for the church's prosperity than for our own, to prefer Jerusalem before our chief joy (Psa 137:6), the success of the gospel, and the flourishing of the church, above our own wealth, credit, ease, and safety, even when they are most in hazard. 2. He is very desirous to return to the enjoyment of the privileges of God's house. He will reckon it the greatest instance of God's favour to him if he may but once more be brought back to see it and his habitation. This will be more his joy than to be brought back to his own palace and throne again. Note, Gracious souls measure their comforts and conveniences in this world by the opportunity they give them of communion with God. Hezekiah wished for the recovery of his health for this reason, that he might go up to the house of the Lord, Isa 38:22. 3. He is very submissive to the holy will of God concerning the issue of this dark dispensation. He hopes the best (Sa2 15:25), and hopes for it from the favour of God, which he looks upon to be the fountain of all good: "If God favour me so far, I shall be settled again as formerly." But he provides for the worst: "If he deny me this favour - if he thus say, I have no delight in thee - I know I deserve the continuance of his displeasure; his holy will be done." See him here patiently awaiting the event: "Behold, here am I, as a servant expecting orders;" and see him willing to commit himself to God concerning it: "Let him do to me as seemeth good to him. I have nothing to object. All is well that God does." Observe with what satisfaction and holy complacency he speaks of the divine disposal: not only, "He can do what he will," subscribing to his power (Job 9:12), or, "He has a right to do what he will," subscribing to his sovereignty (Job 33:13), or, "He will do what he will," subscribing to his unchangeableness (Job 23:13, Job 23:15), but, "Let him to what he will," subscribing to his wisdom and goodness. Note, It is our interest, as well as duty, cheerfully to acquiesce in the will of God, whatever befals us. That we may not complain of what is, let us see God's hand in all events; and, that we may not be afraid of what shall be, let us see all events in God's hand.

III. The confidence David put in the priests that they would serve his interest to the utmost of their power in his absence. He calls Zadok a seer (Sa2 15:27), that is, a wise man, a man that can see into business and discern time and judgment: "Thou hast thy eyes in thy head (Ecc 2:14), and therefore art capable of doing me service, especially by sending me intelligence of the enemy's motions and resolutions." One friend that is a seer, in such an exigency as this, was worth twenty that were not so quick-sighted. For the settling of a private correspondence with the priests in his absence, he appoints, 1. Whom they should send to him - their two sons, Ahimaaz and Jonathan, whose coat, it might be hoped, would be their protection, and of whose prudence and faithfulness he had probably had experience. 2. Whither they should send. He would encamp in the plain of the wilderness till he heard from them (Sa2 15:28), and then would move according to the information and advice they should send him. Hereupon they returned to the city, to await the event. It was a pity that any disturbance should be given to a state so happy as this was, when the prince and the priests had such an entire affection for the confidence in each other.

IV. The melancholy posture that David and his men put themselves into, when, at the beginning of their march, they went up the mount of Olives, Sa2 15:30.

1.David himself, as a deep mourner, covered his head and face for shame and blushing, went bare-foot, as a prisoner or a slave, for mortification, and went weeping. Did it become a man of his reputation for courage and greatness of spirit thus to cry like a child, only for fear of an enemy at a distance, against whom he might easily have made head, and perhaps with one bold stroke have routed him? Yes, it did not ill become him, considering how much there was in this trouble, (1.) Of the unkindness of his son. He could not but weep to think that one who came out of his bowels, and had so often lain in his arms, should thus lift up the heel against him. God himself is said to be grieved with the rebellions of his own children (Psa 95:10) and even broken with their whorish heart, Eze 6:9. (2.) There was much of the displeasure of his God in it. This infused the wormwood and gall into the affliction and misery, Lam 3:19. His sin was ever before him (Psa 51:3), but never so plain nor ever appearing so black as now. He never wept thus when Saul hunted him: but a wounded conscience makes troubles lie heavily, Psa 38:4.

2.When David wept all his company wept likewise, being much affected with his grief and willing to share in it. It is our duty to weep with those that weep, especially our superiors, and those that are better than we; for, if this be done in the green tree, what will be done in the dry? We must weep with those that weep for sin. When Hezekiah humbled himself for his sin all Jerusalem joined with him, Ch2 32:26. To prevent suffering with sinners, let us sorrow with them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–30. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 15:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.