TRV
Translation
King James Version
He said unto me again, Stand, I pray thee, upon me, and slay me: for anguish is come upon me, because my life is yet whole in me.
Complete Jewish Bible
He said to me, 'I'm in agony, and I'm going to die, but I'm still alive. So please, stand next to me; and kill me.'
Berean Standard Bible
Then he begged me, ‘Stand over me and kill me, for agony has seized me, but my life still lingers.’
American Standard Version
And he said unto me, Stand, I pray thee, beside me, and slay me; for anguish hath taken hold of me, because my life is yet whole in me.
World English Bible Messianic
He said to me, ‘Please stand beside me, and kill me; for anguish has taken hold of me, because my life is yet whole in me.’
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then saide hee vnto me, I pray thee come vpon mee, and slay me: for anguish is come vpon me, because my life is yet whole in me.
Young's Literal Translation
`And he saith unto me, Stand, I pray thee, over me, and put me to death, for seized me hath the arrow, for all my soul is still in me.
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 8,032 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Samuel 1 verses 1–10
1 ¶ Now it came to pass after the death of Saul, when David was returned from the slaughter of the Amalekites, and David had abode two days in Ziklag;
2 It came even to pass on the third day, that, behold, a man came out of the camp from Saul with his clothes rent, and earth upon his head: and so it was, when he came to David, that he fell to the earth, and did obeisance.
3 And David said unto him, From whence comest thou? And he said unto him, Out of the camp of Israel am I escaped.
4 And David said unto him, How went the matter? I pray thee, tell me. And he answered, That the people are fled from the battle, and many of the people also are fallen and dead; and Saul and Jonathan his son are dead also.
5 And David said unto the young man that told him, How knowest thou that Saul and Jonathan his son be dead?
6 And the young man that told him said, As I happened by chance upon mount Gilboa, behold, Saul leaned upon his spear; and, lo, the chariots and horsemen followed hard after him.
7 And when he looked behind him, he saw me, and called unto me. And I answered, Here am I.
8 And he said unto me, Who art thou? And I answered him, I am an Amalekite.
9 He said unto me again, Stand, I pray thee, upon me, and slay me: for anguish is come upon me, because my life is yet whole in me.
10 So I stood upon him, and slew him, because I was sure that he could not live after that he was fallen: and I took the crown that was upon his head, and the bracelet that was on his arm, and have brought them hither unto my lord.
Here is, I. David settling again in Ziklag, his own city, after he had rescued his family and friends out of the hands of the Amalekites (Sa2 1:1): He abode in Ziklag. Thence he was now sending presents to his friends (Sa1 30:26), and there he was ready to receive those that came into his interests; not men in distress and debt, as his first followers were, but persons of quality in their country, mighty men, men of war, and captains of thousands (as we find, Ch1 12:1, Ch1 12:8, Ch1 12:20); such came day by day to him, God stirring up their hearts to do so, till he had a great host, like the host of God, as it is said, Ch1 12:22. The secret springs of revolutions are unaccountable, and must be resolved into that Providence which turns all hearts as the rivers of water.
II. Intelligence brought him thither of the death of Saul. It was strange that he did not leave some spies about the camp, to bring him early notice of the issue of the engagement, a sign that he desired not Saul's woeful day, nor was impatient to come to the throne, but willing to wait till those tidings were brought to him which many a one would have sent more than half-way to meet. He that believes does not make haste, takes good news when it comes and is not uneasy while it is in the coming. 1. The messenger presents himself to David as an express, in the posture of a mourner for the deceased prince and a subject to the succeeding one. He came with his clothes rent, and made obeisance to David (Sa2 1:2), pleasing himself with the fancy that he had the honour to be the first that did him homage as his sovereign, but it proved he was the first that received from him sentence of death as his judge. He told David he came from the camp of Israel, and intimated the bad posture it was in when he said he had escaped out of it, having much ado to get away with his life, Sa2 1:3. 2. He gives him a general account of the issue of the battle. David was very desirous to know how the matter went, as one that had more reason than any to be concerned for the public; and he told him very distinctly that the army of Israel was routed, many slain, and, among the rest, Saul and Jonathan, Sa2 1:4. He named only Saul and Jonathan, because he knew David would be most solicitous to know their fate; for Saul was the man whom he most feared and Jonathan the man whom he most loved. 3. He gives him a more particular account of the death of Saul. It is probable that David had heard, by the report of others, what the issue of the war was, for multitudes resorted to him, it should seem, in consequence; but he was desirous to know the certainty of the report concerning Saul and Jonathan, either because he was not forward to believe it or because he would not proceed upon it to make his own claims till he was fully assured of it. He therefore asks, How knowest thou that Saul and Jonathan are dead? in answer to which the young man tells him a very ready story, putting it past doubt that Saul was dead, for he himself had been not only an eye-witness of his death, but an instrument of it, and therefore David might rely upon his testimony. He says nothing, in his narrative, of the death of Jonathan, knowing how ungrateful that would be to David, but accounts only for Saul, thinking (as David understood it well enough, Sa2 4:10) that he should be welcome for that, and rewarded as one that brought good tidings. The account he gives of this matter is, (1.) Very particular. That he happened to go to the place where Saul was (Sa2 1:6) as a passenger, not as a soldier, and therefore an indifferent person, that he found Saul endeavouring to run himself through with his own spear, none of his attendants being willing to do it for him; and, it seems, he could not do it dexterously for himself: his hand and heart failed him. The miserable man had not courage enough either to live or die; he therefore called this stranger to him (Sa2 1:7), enquired what countryman he was, for, provided he was not a Philistine, he would gladly receive from his hand the coup de grace (as the French call it concerning those that are broken on the wheel) - the merciful stroke, that might dispatch him out of his pain. Understanding that he was an Amalekite (neither one of his subjects nor one of his enemies), he begs this favour from him (Sa2 1:9): Stand upon me, and slay me. He is now sick of his dignity and willing to be trampled upon, sick of his life and willing to be slain. Who then would be inordinately fond of life or honour? The case may he such, even with those that have no hope in their death, that yet they may desire to die, and death flee from them, Rev 9:6. Anguish has come upon me; so we read it, as a complaint of the pain and terror his spirit was seized with. If his conscience now brought to mind the javelin he had cast at David, his pride, malice, and perfidiousness, and especially the murder of the priests, no marvel that anguish came upon him: moles (they say) open their eyes when they are dying. Sense of unpardoned guilt will make death indeed the king of terrors. Those that have baffled their convictions will perhaps, in their dying moments, be overpowered by them. The margin reads it as a complaint of the inconvenience of his clothes; that his coat of mail which he had for defence, or his embroidered coat which he had for ornament, hindered him, that he could not get the spear far enough into his body, or so straitened him, now that his body swelled with anguish, that he could not expire. Let no man's clothes be his pride, for it may so happen that they may be his burden and snare. "Hereupon," saith our young man, "I stood upon him, and slew him" (Sa2 1:10) at which word, perhaps, he observed David look upon him with some show of displeasure, and therefore he excuses himself in the next words: "For I was sure he could not live; his life was whole in him indeed, but he would certainly have fallen into the hands of the Philistines or given himself another thrust." (2.) It is doubtful whether this story be true. If it be, the righteousness of God is to be observed, that Saul, who spared the Amalekites in contempt of the divine command, received his death's wound from an Amalekite. But most interpreters think that it was false, and that, though he might happen to be present, yet he was not assisting in the death of Saul, but told David so in expectation that he would reward him for it, as having done him a piece of good service. Those who would rejoice at the fall of an enemy are apt to measure others by themselves, and to think that they will do so too. But a man after God's own heart is not to be judged of by common men. I am not clear whether this young man's story was true or no: it may consist with the narrative in the chapter before, and be an addition to it, as Peter's account of the death of Judas (Act 1:18) is to the narrative, Mat 27:5. What is there called a sword may here be called a spear, or when he fell upon his sword he leaned on his spear. (3.) However he produced that which was proof sufficient of the death of Saul, the crown that was upon his head and the bracelet that was on his arm. It should seem Saul was so foolishly fond of these as to wear them in the field of battle, which made him a fair mark for the archers, by distinguishing him from those about him; but as pride (we say) feels no cold, so it fears no danger, from that which gratifies it. These fell into the hands of this Amalekite. Saul spared the best of their spoil, and now the best of his came to one of that devoted nation. He brought them to David, as the rightful owner of them now that Saul was dead, not doubting but by his officiousness herein to recommend himself to the best preferments in his court or camp. The tradition of the Jews is that this Amalekite was the son of Doeg (for the Amalekites were descendants from Edom), and that Doeg, who they suppose was Saul's armour-bearer, before he slew himself gave Saul's crown and bracelet (the ensigns of his royalty) to his son, and bade him carry them to David, to curry favour with him. But this is a groundless conceit. Doeg's son, it is likely, was so well known to Saul that he needed not ask him as he did this Amalekite (Sa2 1:8), Who art thou? David had been long waiting for the crown, and now it was brought to him by an Amalekite. See how God can serve his own purposes of kindness to his people, even by designing (ill-designing) men, who aim at nothing but to set up themselves.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 2 Samuel 1:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
2 Samuel 1:9 presents the Amalekite's dramatic, yet highly questionable, account of King Saul's final moments on Mount Gilboa. In this narrative, the Amalekite claims that Saul, gravely wounded and in profound agony, desperately pleaded for a swift end to his suffering, stating that his life force remained within him despite his injuries. This pivotal verse sets the stage for the revelation of Saul's demise to David, initiating the solemn transition of power and immediately raising questions about the veracity of the Amalekite's report.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed at the very beginning of 2 Samuel, serving as the climactic point of the Amalekite's report to David concerning the devastating Battle of Gilboa, as detailed in 2 Samuel 1:1-10. It directly follows the tragic conclusion of 1 Samuel, which culminated in Saul's defeat and death. The Amalekite's sensational claim in this verse, that he delivered the fatal blow to Saul at the king's own request, immediately creates a stark contradiction with the earlier, more reliable account in 1 Samuel 31:4-5, where Saul takes his own life. This discrepancy is crucial, as it forces the reader to question the Amalekite's motives and trustworthiness, setting up David's unexpected and severe response to the news, which culminates in the Amalekite's execution in 2 Samuel 1:16. The entire opening chapter of 2 Samuel functions as a solemn and decisive transition, marking the definitive end of Saul's tumultuous reign and paving the way for David's divinely appointed kingship.
Historical & Cultural Context: The Amalekites were long-standing, bitter enemies of Israel, with a history of conflict dating back to the wilderness wanderings, as recounted in Exodus 17:8-16. God had explicitly commanded their utter destruction (e.g., Deuteronomy 25:17-19), a command Saul himself had notoriously failed to fully execute, a pivotal act of disobedience that led to his rejection as king (see 1 Samuel 15). The Amalekite's presence on Mount Gilboa, the site of the battle, is plausible given their nomadic and opportunistic nature, often scavenging battlefields for spoils. His decision to approach David with the news of Saul's death, expecting a reward for what he presented as a meritorious act of ending a rival's life, reflects a common ancient Near Eastern cultural practice where swift news of a king's demise, especially a rival, could be highly valued. However, David's response, one of profound grief and reverence for God's anointed, transcends typical political opportunism and highlights a different cultural value: the sacredness of the king's person, even a fallen one.
Key Themes: This verse, and the Amalekite's account as a whole, contributes significantly to several overarching themes within 2 Samuel and the broader Deuteronomistic History. Firstly, it powerfully underscores the end of an era and the divinely orchestrated transition of power from Saul's failed monarchy to David's emerging kingship, emphasizing God's sovereign hand in establishing His chosen leader. Secondly, it vividly portrays the theme of suffering and despair, as Saul's alleged plea for death illustrates the profound agony of a mortally wounded man facing a humiliating end at the hands of his enemies. Thirdly, the Amalekite's likely fabrication introduces the pervasive theme of deception and opportunism, where individuals attempt to manipulate circumstances and truth for personal gain, a motif that will recur throughout David's complex reign. Finally, David's subsequent decisive judgment on the Amalekite in 2 Samuel 1:16 reinforces the critical theme of divine justice and the inviolable sanctity of God's anointed, even in their failure or demise.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The narrative of 2 Samuel 1:9, as presented through the Amalekite's testimony, is rich with literary devices. Irony is profoundly present, as the Amalekite, in claiming to have mercifully ended Saul's suffering, intends to gain favor and reward from David, yet this very claim, meant to elevate him, leads directly to his own execution. There is a strong sense of pathos in the description of Saul's anguish; regardless of the Amalekite's veracity, the depiction of a king in such unbearable pain that he begs for death evokes deep sympathy and pity from the reader. The stark contradiction between this account and the earlier, more reliable narrative in 1 Samuel 31:4-5 creates significant dramatic tension and immediately establishes the theme of unreliable narration. This tension invites the reader to actively discern truth from deception, highlighting the moral complexities of the situation. Ultimately, this literary strategy serves to underscore David's character, his unwavering respect for God's anointed, and the divine hand at work in the transition of power.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse, though part of a disputed account, powerfully illustrates the depths of human suffering and the desperate desire for relief when life becomes unbearable. Theologically, it touches upon the sovereignty of God in the transition of power, even amidst human deception and tragedy. While the Amalekite's lie is condemned, the underlying reality of Saul's demise marks the definitive end of a divinely appointed, yet ultimately disobedient, reign, making way for David, the man after God's own heart. It serves as a stark reminder that God's purposes will prevail, often through complex and even morally ambiguous human actions. The narrative also underscores the biblical emphasis on truthfulness, as the Amalekite's deception, intended to curry favor, results in his swift judgment, reinforcing the principle that God values honesty and integrity.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The account in 2 Samuel 1:9, even if partially fabricated, presents a profound reflection on the nature of suffering and the human yearning for release from agony. It challenges us to consider our own responses to pain, both physical and emotional, and to cultivate deep compassion for those who are deeply distressed, offering comfort and support rather than judgment. While Saul's alleged plea was for a physical end to his suffering, we are reminded that true and lasting relief from the anguish of sin, despair, and the brokenness of this world is found only in Christ. Furthermore, the Amalekite's opportunistic deception serves as a potent warning against dishonesty and manipulation for personal gain. It reminds us that integrity and truthfulness are paramount in God's eyes, and that attempting to capitalize on others' misfortunes or to embellish reality for selfish motives ultimately leads to spiritual and often temporal ruin. We are called to live lives of transparency and honesty, trusting that God's sovereign plan will unfold without our deceitful interference, and that His justice will ultimately prevail.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Was the Amalekite telling the truth about killing Saul?
Answer: No, the overwhelming evidence from the biblical text indicates the Amalekite was not telling the truth. The account in 1 Samuel 31:4-5 explicitly states that Saul fell on his own sword after his armor-bearer refused to kill him. The Amalekite likely found Saul's body after the battle, perhaps took his crown and armlet as proof, and then fabricated or embellished his story, hoping to gain favor and a reward from David for "delivering" him from his rival, Saul. David's swift and severe judgment against the Amalekite in 2 Samuel 1:16 further underscores the falsehood of his claim, as David viewed the killing of God's anointed as an egregious offense, regardless of Saul's failures.
Why did Saul ask to be killed, according to the Amalekite's story?
Answer: According to the Amalekite's account in this verse, Saul was grievously wounded in battle but still alive and in immense pain. The phrase "anguish is come upon me, because my life is yet whole in me" vividly describes his condition: he was fully conscious and suffering terribly. He sought a quick death to end his agony and to avoid the humiliation, torture, or desecration that would likely follow capture by the Philistines. This desperate plea for a swift end aligns with the desperation Saul showed in 1 Samuel 31:4 when he urged his armor-bearer to kill him, indicating a consistent desire to avoid capture and prolonged suffering.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 2 Samuel 1:9 describes the desperate plea of a fallen king facing a humiliating and agonizing end, it subtly points to the ultimate King, Jesus Christ, whose suffering and death were of an entirely different nature and purpose. Saul's anguish was a consequence of his own choices and the battle's outcome, a desperate attempt to escape pain and shame. In stark contrast, Jesus willingly embraced suffering, not to escape agony, but to endure it for the salvation of humanity. His cry on the cross, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:46), was not a plea for an end to suffering, but the deepest expression of bearing the world's sin and the Father's wrath on our behalf. Unlike Saul, who sought death to avoid further pain and humiliation, Christ's death was a triumphant act, a voluntary and purposeful sacrifice that conquered sin, death, and the powers of darkness (Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14-15). The transition from Saul's failed kingship to David's righteous reign foreshadows the coming of Jesus, the true Son of David, whose kingdom is eternal, righteous, and brings true peace and deliverance from all anguish, offering eternal life to all who believe (Luke 1:32-33; Isaiah 9:6-7).