TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Kings 15 verses 8–31
The best days of the kingdom of Israel were while the government was in Jehu's family. In his reign, and the next three reigns, though there were many abominable corruptions and miserable grievances in Israel, yet the crown went in succession, the kings died in their beds, and some care was taken of public affairs; but, now that those days are at an end, the history which we have in these verses of about thirty-three years represents the affairs of that kingdom in the utmost confusion imaginable. Woe to those that were with child (Kg2 15:16) and to those that gave suck in those days, for then must needs be great tribulations, when, for the transgression of the land, many were the princes thereof.
I. Let us observe something, in general, concerning these unhappy revolutions and the calamities which must needs attend them - these bad times, as they may truly be called. 1. God had tried the people of Israel both with judgments and mercies, explained and enforced by his servants the prophets, and yet they continued impenitent and unreformed, and therefore God justly brought these miseries upon them, as Moses had warned them. If you will yet walk contrary to me, I will punish you yet seven times more, Lev 26:21, etc. 2. God made good his promise to Jehu, that his sons to the fourth generation after him should sit upon the throne of Israel, which was a greater favour than was shown to any of the royal families either before or after his. God had said it should be so (Kg2 10:30) and we are told in this chapter (Kg2 15:12) that so it came to pass. See how punctual God is to his promises. These calamities God long designed for Israel, and they deserved them, yet they were not inflicted till that word had taken effect to the full. Thus God rewarded Jehu for his zeal in destroying the worship of Baal and the house of Ahab; and yet, when the measure of the sins of the house of Jehu was full, God avenged upon it the blood then shed, called the blood of Jezreel, Hos 1:4. 3. All these kings did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord, for they walked in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat. Though at variance with one another, yet in this they agreed, to keep up idolatry, and the people loved to have it so; though they were emptied from vessel to vessel, that taste remained in them, and that scent was not changed. It was sad indeed when their government was so often altered, yet never for the better - that among all those contending interests none of them should think it as much their interest to destroy the calves as others had done to support them. 4. Each of these (except one) conspired against his predecessor, and slew him - Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea, all traitors and murderers, and yet all kings awhile, one of them ten, another twenty, and another nine years; for God may suffer wickedness to prosper and to carry away the wealth and honours awhile, but, sooner or later, blood shall have blood, and he that dealt treacherously shalt be dealt treacherously with. One wicked man is often made a scourge to another, and every wicked man, at length, a ruin to himself. 5. The ambition of the great men made the nation miserable. Here is Tiphsah, a city of Israel, barbarously destroyed, with all the coasts thereof, by one of these pretenders (Kg2 15:16), and no doubt it was through blood that each of them waded to the throne, nor could any of these kings perish alone. No land can have greater pests, nor Israel worse troubles, than such men as care not how much the welfare and repose of their country are sacrificed to their revenge and affectation of dominion. 6. While the nation was thus shattered by divisions at home the kings of Assyria, first one (Kg2 15:19) and then another (Kg2 15:29), came against it and did what they pleased. Nothing does more towards the making of a nation an easy prey to a common enemy than intestine broils and contests for the sovereignty. Happy the land where that is settled. 7. This was the condition of Israel just before they were quite ruined and carried away captive, for that was in the ninth year of Hoshea, the last of these usurpers. If they had, in these days of confusion and perplexity, humbled themselves before God and sought his face, that final destruction might have been prevented; but when God judgeth he will overcome. These factions, the fruit of an evil spirit sent among them, hastened that captivity, for a kingdom thus divided against itself will soon come to desolation.
II. Let us take a short view of the particular reigns.
1.Zachariah, the son of Jeroboam, began to reign in the thirty-eighth year of Azariah, or Uzziah, king of Judah, Kg2 15:8. Some of the most critical chronologers reckon that between Jeroboam and his son Zachariah the throne was vacant twenty-two years, others eleven years, through the disturbances and dissensions that were in the kingdom; and then it was not strange that Zachariah was deposed before he was well seated on the throne: he reigned but six months, and then Shallum slew him before the people, perhaps as Caesar was slain in the senate, or he put him to death publicly as a criminal, with the approbation of the people, to whom he had, some way or other, made himself odious; so ended the line of Jehu.
2.But had Shallum peace, who slew his master? No, he had not (Kg2 15:13), one month of days measured his reign and then he was cut off; perhaps to this the prophet, who then lived, refers (Hos 5:7), Now shall a month devour them with their portions. That dominion seldom lasts long which is founded in blood and falsehood. Menahem, either provoked by his crime or animated by his example, soon served him as he had served his master - slew him and reigned in his stead, Kg2 15:14. Probably he was general in the army, which then lay encamped at Tirzah, and, hearing of Shallum's treason and usurpation, hastened to punish it, as Omri did that of Zimri in a like case, Kg1 16:17.
3.Menahem held the kingdom ten years, Kg2 15:17. But, whereas we have heard that the kings of the house of Israel were merciful kings (Kg1 20:31), this Menahem (the scandal of his country) was so prodigiously cruel to those of his own nation who hesitated a little at submitting to him that he not only ruined a city, and the coasts thereof, but, forgetting that he himself was born of a woman, ripped up all the women with child, Kg2 15:16. We may well wonder that ever it should enter into the heart of any man to be so barbarous, and to be so perfectly lost to humanity itself. By these cruel methods he hoped to strengthen himself and to frighten all others into his interests; but it seems he did not gain his point, for when the king of Assyria came against him, (1.) So little confidence had he in his people that he durst not meet him as an enemy, but was obliged, at a vast expense, to purchase a peace with him. (2.) Such need had he of help to confirm the kingdom in his hand that he made it part of his bargain with him (a bargain which, no doubt, the king of Assyria knew how to make a good hand of another time) that he should assist him against his own subjects that were disaffected to him. The money wherewith he purchased his friendship was a vast sum, no less than 1000 talents of silver (Kg2 15:19), which Menahem exacted, it is probable, by military execution, of all the mighty men of wealth, very considerately sparing the poor, and laying the burden (as was fit) on those that were best able to bear it; being raised, it was given to the king of Assyria, as pay for his army, fifty shekels of silver for each man in it. Thus he got clear of the king of Assyria for this time; he staid not to quarter in the land (Kg2 15:20), but his army now got so rich a booty with so little trouble that it encouraged them to come again, not long after, when they laid all waste. Thus was he the betrayer of his country that should have been the protector of it.
4.Pekahiah, the son of Menahem, succeeded his father, but reigned only two years, and then was treacherously slain by Pekah, falling under the load both of his own and of his father's wickedness. It is repeated concerning him as before that he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam. Still this is mentioned, to show that God was righteous in bringing that destruction upon them which came not long after, because they hated to be reformed, Kg2 15:24. Pekah, it seems, had some persons of figure in his interest, two of whom are here named (Kg2 15:25), and with their help he compassed his design.
5.Pekah, though he got the kingdom by treason, kept it twenty years (Kg2 15:27), so long it was before his violent dealing returned upon his own head, but it returned at last. This Pekah, son of Remaliah, (1.) Made himself more considerable abroad than any of these usurpers, for he was, even in the latter end of his time (in the reign of Ahaz, which began in his seventeenth year), a great terror to the kingdom of Judah, as we find, Isa 7:1, etc. (2.) He lost a great part of his kingdom to the king of Assyria. Several cities are here named (Kg2 15:29) which were taken from him, all the land of Gilead on the other side Jordan, and Galilee in the north containing the tribes of Naphtali and Zebulon, were seized, and the inhabitants carried captive into Assyria. By this judgment God punished him for his attempt upon Judah and Jerusalem. It was then foretold that within two or three years after he made that attempt, before a child, then born, should be able to cry My father and my mother, the riches of Samaria should be taken away before the king of Assyria (Isa 8:4), and here we have the accomplishment of that prediction. (3.) Soon after this he forfeited his life to the resentments of his countrymen, who, it is probable, were disgusted at him for leaving them exposed to a foreign enemy, while he was invading Judah, of which Hoshea took advantage and, to gain his crown, seized his life, slew him, and reigned in his stead. Surely he was fond of a crown indeed who, at this time, would run such a hazard as a traitor did; for the crown of Israel, now that it had lost the choicest of its flowers and jewels, was lined more than ever with thorns, had of late been fatal to all the heads that had worn it, was forfeited to divine justice, and now ready to be laid in the dust - a crown which a wise man would not have taken up in the street, yet Hoshea not only ventured upon it but ventured for it, and it cost him dear.
Continue studying 2 Kings 15:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
This verse chronicles a critical juncture in the reign of King Menahem of Israel, detailing his desperate and costly act of paying a massive tribute to the encroaching Assyrian King Pul (Tiglath-Pileser III). To avert an immediate and devastating invasion, Menahem imposed a heavy tax of fifty shekels of silver on each of the wealthiest men in Israel, successfully compelling the formidable Assyrian forces to withdraw. This event not only underscores the Northern Kingdom's profound political instability and spiritual decline but also marks a significant and irreversible step towards its eventual subjugation and the complete loss of its independence to the rapidly expanding Neo-Assyrian Empire.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: 2 Kings 15 is a somber chapter, meticulously charting the rapid succession of short, violent, and ungodly reigns in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, following the tumultuous Jehu dynasty. The narrative moves with unsettling speed from one assassinated king to another—Zachariah, Shallum, Menahem, Pekahiah, and Pekah—each reign characterized by internal strife, regicide, pervasive idolatry, and escalating political instability. Verse 20 specifically follows Menahem's brutal seizure of the throne from Shallum, establishing his reign through violence and oppression (as seen in 2 Kings 15:16). The payment of tribute described here is a direct, desperate consequence of the escalating external threat posed by Assyria, a threat that had been looming for decades. This act of appeasement sets a dangerous precedent, paving the way for subsequent Assyrian interventions and ultimately, the complete destruction and exile of the Northern Kingdom, a tragic culmination detailed in 2 Kings 17.
Historical & Cultural Context: The mid-8th century BC was a period of profound geopolitical upheaval across the Ancient Near East, dominated by the relentless and brutal expansion of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Under formidable and ruthless rulers like Tiglath-Pileser III (referred to as Pul in the biblical text, a name also found in Assyrian royal annals), Assyria pursued an aggressive policy of conquest, annexation, and the imposition of crippling tribute on smaller, weaker states. Israel, already severely weakened by internal strife, chronic spiritual apostasy, and a succession of unstable kings, found itself directly in the path of this insatiable imperial machine. The practice of exacting heavy tribute from conquered or threatened nations was a standard Assyrian tactic, designed not only to deplete resources and enrich the empire but also to assert absolute dominance and prevent any future rebellion. The "fifty shekels of silver" from "mighty men of wealth" represents an enormous financial burden; a single shekel of silver was roughly 0.4 ounces, meaning 50 shekels amounted to approximately 1.25 pounds of silver. This was a truly staggering sum for an individual, highlighting the immense economic strain placed upon Israel's elite to buy a fragile and temporary peace.
Key Themes: This verse powerfully illustrates several recurring and tragic themes woven throughout the book of Kings. Firstly, it highlights the devastating consequences of disobedience and idolatry in Israel. The nation's persistent spiritual decline and abandonment of the Mosaic covenant directly led to its political weakness and vulnerability to formidable foreign powers, a cause-and-effect relationship explicitly articulated later in 2 Kings 17:7-18. Secondly, it underscores the progressive loss of sovereignty and the increasing subjugation of Israel. A nation once promised divine protection and prosperity under covenant faithfulness was now reduced to a desperate vassal state, forced to pay exorbitant sums to preserve a semblance of existence. Thirdly, the verse vividly portrays the desperation of human leadership when confronted with overwhelming threats. Menahem's decision to appease Assyria, while pragmatically aimed at immediate survival, reflects a profound failure to seek divine deliverance or to trust in God's power. This act of appeasement tragically foreshadows the complete and inevitable fall of the Northern Kingdom and its subsequent exile, a fate that looms large and is ultimately realized in the latter chapters of 2 Kings.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs Conciseness to convey a momentous historical event with striking brevity, focusing sharply on Menahem's action (exacting money) and its immediate consequence (Assyrian withdrawal). There is a profound element of Irony in Menahem's "success"; while he temporarily saves his kingdom from immediate destruction, his act of appeasement ultimately seals Israel's fate as a subjugated vassal state, foreshadowing its inevitable and complete demise. The phrase "mighty men of wealth" functions as a form of Metonymy, where "mighty" implies their substantial social and economic power and influence rather than purely physical strength, effectively identifying them as the financial backbone and elite of the nation. Furthermore, the narrative itself serves as Foreshadowing, subtly but powerfully hinting at the unavoidable subjugation and eventual exile of the Northern Kingdom by the Assyrian Empire, a tragic trajectory that culminates in the destruction of Samaria.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This historical account resonates with profound theological implications, serving as a stark commentary on national and individual faithfulness. Menahem's desperate act of appeasement, while seemingly pragmatic in the face of overwhelming military might, represents a profound failure to trust in God's covenantal protection and provision. Throughout Israel's history, periods of national distress and foreign oppression were consistently presented as a direct consequence of spiritual apostasy, idolatry, and a turning away from the Lord. The payment of tribute to a pagan king, rather than seeking divine intervention through repentance and obedience, illustrates a reliance on human power, political maneuvering, and material sacrifice over genuine faith in the sovereign God of Israel. This event serves as a poignant reminder that true security, national flourishing, and enduring peace are found in covenant faithfulness and obedience to God's commands, not in the appeasement of earthly powers or the accumulation of wealth. The heavy burden placed on the "mighty men of wealth" also speaks to the societal impact of ungodly leadership and the widespread consequences of national sin, where the weight of compromise falls disproportionately on the people.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
2 Kings 15:20, though a concise snapshot of ancient political maneuvering and national desperation, offers enduring lessons for individuals and communities today. It challenges us to critically examine where we place our ultimate trust for security, provision, and deliverance. Menahem's immediate problem was solved, but at the immense cost of long-term sovereignty, national dignity, and the initiation of a clear trajectory of decline that would soon lead to utter destruction. This prompts us to consider whether our own "solutions" to pressing problems—be they financial anxieties, relational conflicts, career pressures, or societal challenges—are truly aligned with God's will and His kingdom principles, or if they are desperate attempts to appease immediate pressures through means that compromise our ultimate allegiance to God. The heavy burden placed on the wealthy also serves as a poignant reminder of the ripple effects of leadership decisions and the potential for systemic injustice or widespread suffering when power is used for self-preservation rather than righteous governance and the well-being of all. Ultimately, the passage calls us to a deeper, unwavering dependence on God, recognizing that true peace, security, and lasting deliverance stem solely from His sovereign hand and His covenant faithfulness, not from human alliances, material sacrifices, or pragmatic compromises.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who was Pul, the king of Assyria mentioned in this verse?
Answer: Pul is another name for Tiglath-Pileser III, one of the most powerful, influential, and significant kings of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. He reigned from 745 to 727 BC and is renowned for his aggressive military campaigns, comprehensive administrative reforms, and the systematic expansion of Assyrian control over the Near East. His campaigns against the smaller kingdoms of the Levant, including both Israel and Judah, are extensively documented in both biblical texts and Assyrian royal inscriptions. Tiglath-Pileser III's policy of exacting heavy tribute, annexing territories, and systematically deporting conquered populations profoundly shaped the history of the region and directly led to the eventual fall of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, as recounted in devastating detail in 2 Kings 17.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 2 Kings 15:20 depicts Israel's desperate and costly attempt to buy temporary peace through a heavy tribute, it ultimately foreshadows a vastly different and eternally significant transaction. Menahem's payment to Pul highlights humanity's futile and insufficient efforts to secure salvation, peace, or lasting freedom through material means, political maneuvering, or self-effort. In stark contrast to this human inadequacy, the New Testament reveals the ultimate "tribute" paid not by humanity to an oppressive earthly power, but by God Himself for humanity. Jesus Christ, the true King, did not exact money or a burdensome tax from His people to appease an earthly foe; instead, He freely gave His life as the supreme ransom, paying the ultimate and perfect price to deliver us from the dominion of sin, the power of death, and the tyranny of the Evil One (as affirmed in Mark 10:45 and 1 Timothy 2:5-6). His sacrificial death on the cross, the shedding of His precious blood, is the "price" that secures our eternal redemption, a redemption not bought with perishable things like silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ (as declared in 1 Peter 1:18-19). This divine payment truly turned back the ultimate enemy, Satan, and established lasting peace with God (Colossians 1:19-20). Unlike Menahem's temporary and costly reprieve, Christ's payment offers complete, eternal, and freely given freedom, transforming us from vassals of sin into beloved children of God, heirs of an unshakable kingdom (Hebrews 12:28). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, providing the ultimate, once-for-all sacrifice that no amount of silver, no human effort, and no earthly tribute could ever achieve.