Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he hasted, and took the ashes away from his face; and the king of Israel discerned him that he was of the prophets.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he hasted H4116, and took the ashes H666 away H5493 from his face H5869; and the king H4428 of Israel H3478 discerned H5234 him that he was of the prophets H5030.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Quickly he removed the bandage from his eyes, and the king of Isra'el recognized him as one of the prophets.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then the prophet quickly removed the bandage from his eyes, and the king of Israel recognized him as one of the prophets.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he hasted, and took the headband away from his eyes; and the king of Israel discerned him that he was of the prophets.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He hurried, and took the headband away from his eyes; and the king of Israel recognized that he was of the prophets.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And hee hasted, and tooke the ashes away from his face: and the King of Israel knewe him that he was of the Prophets:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he hasteth and turneth aside the ashes from off his eyes, and the king of Israel discerneth him, that he is of the prophets,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Ahab and Ben-Hadad
Ahab and Ben-Hadad View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,450 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 20:41 captures the pivotal moment when a prophet, having cleverly disguised himself, swiftly removes his concealment to reveal his true identity to King Ahab. This dramatic unveiling forces Ahab to recognize that the man before him is not merely a wounded soldier but a direct messenger of God. The verse marks the abrupt shift from a veiled parable to a stark, undeniable prophetic confrontation, transforming Ahab's perception of a casual interaction into a divinely sanctioned indictment against his recent act of disobedience in sparing Ben-hadad.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the dramatic climax of the prophet's confrontation with King Ahab, immediately following a meticulously crafted parable (1 Kings 20:35-40). God had granted Ahab a decisive victory over Ben-hadad, the Aramean king, with a clear divine mandate to utterly destroy him (1 Kings 20:28-30). However, Ahab, against God's explicit command, chose to spare Ben-hadad and forge a covenant with him (1 Kings 20:31-34). The prophet's disguise—likely a bandage or ashes simulating a battle wound—enabled him to approach Ahab without immediate recognition as a prophet, thereby setting the stage for the king's unwitting self-condemnation. The removal of this disguise in verse 41 is the critical turning point, stripping away the pretense and unveiling the divine authority behind the message, preparing the way for the direct pronouncement of judgment in the subsequent verse (1 Kings 20:42), where the prophet declares that Ahab's life will be taken for Ben-hadad's life, and his people for Ben-hadad's people.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, prophets functioned as God's direct spokespersons, often tasked with confronting kings and challenging their policies when such policies deviated from divine law. Their authority was derived solely from Yahweh, making their messages weighty, often unwelcome, and sometimes dangerous for the messenger. The use of disguise, as seen here, was not uncommon in prophetic acts, sometimes employed for dramatic effect or to gain access to a powerful figure without immediate prejudice. Ashes or a bandage would have been a common sight on a returning soldier, making the prophet's ruse plausible and his story relatable. Kings like Ahab were expected to uphold the covenant with Yahweh and execute divine justice, especially against enemies designated for destruction. Ahab's decision to spare Ben-hadad was a direct affront to God's will and a serious breach of his responsibilities as Israel's king, reflecting a deeper pattern of spiritual compromise and idolatry that characterized his reign, particularly his relationship with Jezebel and the worship of Baal, as vividly depicted in the account of Elijah on Mount Carmel.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully illustrates several crucial themes. Divine Revelation is central, as God, through His prophet, dramatically unveils His truth and judgment, even when it is uncomfortable or condemns the powerful. The physical act of removing the disguise symbolizes the stripping away of human pretense and the clear manifestation of divine will. Prophetic Authority and Confrontation are also profoundly evident; the prophet, as God's messenger, stands boldly against the king, demonstrating that even earthly rulers are ultimately accountable to the heavenly King. This confrontation highlights the prophet's indispensable role as a divine check on royal power. Furthermore, the theme of Consequences of Disobedience is powerfully underscored, as Ahab's recognition of the prophet signals the imminent pronouncement of judgment for his failure to obey God's command regarding Ben-hadad. This theme is a recurring motif throughout the Deuteronomistic history, where obedience consistently leads to blessing and disobedience to judgment, as outlined in Deuteronomy 28, which details blessings and curses.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hasted (Hebrew, mâhar', H4116): This verb implies swiftness, urgency, or promptness. The prophet's immediate action to remove his disguise indicates a deliberate and sudden revelation. It is not a casual uncovering but a decisive act designed to create an abrupt shift in the king's perception, emphasizing the gravity and immediacy of the divine message about to be delivered. The haste underscores the urgency of God's confrontation.
  • Discerned (Hebrew, nâkar', H5234): More than merely "seeing" or "recognizing" in a superficial sense, nâkar denotes a deeper understanding or acknowledgment of identity and significance. When Ahab "discerned" the prophet, it meant he grasped not just who the man was, but the profound implications of his identity as a messenger from Yahweh. This recognition carried the weight of divine authority, transforming the preceding parable from a hypothetical scenario into a direct, personal condemnation from God.
  • Prophets (Hebrew, nâbîyʼ', H5030): This term refers to one who is called by God to speak on His behalf, a spokesperson or an announcer of divine will. The recognition that the man was "of the prophets" immediately elevated the encounter from a mundane conversation to a sacred one, placing Ahab in direct confrontation with God's word and judgment, rather than merely with a disgruntled soldier. This realization would have invoked the full weight of the prophetic office and its divine backing.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he hasted, and took the ashes away from his face;": This clause describes the prophet's swift and intentional action. The "ashes" (or possibly a bandage, as implied by some interpretations of the disguise) were part of his elaborate masquerade as a wounded soldier returning from battle. The act of "taking away" signifies the deliberate removal of the veil, exposing his true identity and purpose. This sudden unveiling is a dramatic device, designed to shock Ahab and command his full attention, signaling that the time for veiled communication is over and direct confrontation is at hand.
  • "and the king of Israel discerned him": This phrase highlights Ahab's immediate and profound recognition. The word "discerned" (from nâkar) implies a sudden realization, an understanding that penetrates beyond the surface. Ahab did not just see a man; he grasped the identity and authority of the individual. This discernment is crucial because it means Ahab could no longer dismiss the previous interaction as a mere parable or a soldier's complaint; he now understood it was a divinely orchestrated message.
  • "that he [was] of the prophets.": This final part of the clause confirms the content of Ahab's discernment. He recognized that the man was not just any individual but a "prophet," a divinely appointed messenger. This recognition immediately imbued the prophet's preceding words, and the judgment Ahab had unknowingly pronounced, with the full weight of God's authority. It set the stage for the direct and severe condemnation that would follow, making it clear that Ahab's actions were not merely political missteps but direct offenses against Yahweh.

Literary Devices

The verse is rich in Dramatic Irony, as King Ahab, moments before, had unknowingly condemned himself by judging the hypothetical scenario presented by the prophet. The prophet's Disguise serves as a powerful Symbol of veiled truth, which is then dramatically removed, symbolizing the unveiling of God's direct message. The swift removal of the ashes creates a moment of Anagnorisis (recognition or discovery), where Ahab's perception shifts abruptly from ignorance to understanding. This sudden revelation also functions as Foreshadowing, signaling the imminent and severe judgment that will be pronounced against Ahab, heightening the dramatic tension and emphasizing the gravity of the king's disobedience. The entire scene is a carefully orchestrated Confrontation, designed by God to expose Ahab's sin and pronounce its consequences through a divinely authorized messenger.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This pivotal moment in 1 Kings 20:41 underscores the unwavering nature of God's justice and His commitment to holding even the most powerful accountable. Ahab's recognition of the prophet signifies that divine truth, though sometimes hidden or delivered indirectly, will ultimately be revealed and confront human disobedience. It highlights the crucial role of prophets as God's instruments for revelation, conviction, and the pronouncement of judgment or blessing, ensuring that humanity is left without excuse. The scene serves as a powerful reminder that God is sovereign over kings and nations, and His commands are not to be trifled with, for defiance carries severe consequences.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The dramatic unveiling in 1 Kings 20:41 serves as a potent spiritual mirror for us today. Just as King Ahab was confronted with an undeniable truth that exposed his disobedience, so too are we often faced with moments where God's truth, whether through His Word, the counsel of a trusted friend, or the circumstances of life, strips away our comfortable illusions and exposes areas of our lives that are out of alignment with His will. The key is not merely to "discern" the source of the message, but to respond with humility and repentance, unlike Ahab who ultimately hardened his heart. This passage challenges us to cultivate spiritual sensitivity, to be open to divine correction even when it is uncomfortable, and to recognize God's voice in its various forms. Ignoring God's warnings, or rationalizing our disobedience, inevitably leads to spiritual decline and dire consequences, whereas genuine repentance opens the door to restoration and alignment with His purposes.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically respond when God's truth confronts my personal disobedience or comfortable compromises?
  • In what "disguises" or unexpected ways might God be trying to communicate uncomfortable truths to me today?
  • What steps can I take to cultivate greater spiritual discernment, so that I am more attuned to recognizing God's voice and will in my life?

FAQ

Why did the prophet use a disguise to confront King Ahab?

Answer: The prophet used a disguise, appearing as a wounded soldier, primarily to set up a dramatic parable that would lead King Ahab to unknowingly condemn himself. By presenting a hypothetical scenario about a soldier losing a prisoner entrusted to him, the prophet allowed Ahab to pronounce a judgment that directly mirrored his own sin of sparing Ben-hadad. This method circumvented Ahab's likely immediate dismissal or anger if a known prophet had directly confronted him, forcing the king to engage with the principle of accountability before realizing he was the one being judged. It highlighted God's wisdom in exposing sin through unexpected means, ensuring the king's own words would be his undoing.

What was the significance of "ashes" or a "bandage" on the prophet's face?

Answer: The "ashes" (or a bandage, as some translations and interpretations suggest) were a common and recognizable sign of a soldier who had just come from battle, possibly indicating a wound or mourning. This disguise made the prophet's story plausible and allowed him to blend in as a common subject seeking the king's attention. It was a crucial element of the ruse, making Ahab's initial interaction with him seem ordinary, thus enhancing the dramatic impact of the subsequent revelation. It created a context of perceived normalcy that made the eventual divine confrontation all the more striking.

Did King Ahab truly repent after this encounter with the prophet?

Answer: While 1 Kings 20:41 marks a moment of clear discernment for Ahab, his subsequent actions do not indicate genuine, lasting repentance. Immediately following this confrontation, the prophet pronounces God's judgment that Ahab's life would be taken for Ben-hadad's life (1 Kings 20:42). Ahab goes away "sullen and displeased" (1 Kings 20:43), indicating anger and resentment rather than contrite sorrow. His continued spiritual decline is evident in his later actions, such as his coveting and seizing Naboth's vineyard (1 Kings 21), which ultimately leads to further prophetic condemnation from Elijah and his eventual death in battle, fulfilling the prophet's word in 1 Kings 22:37-38, describing Ahab's death and burial.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The dramatic revelation of the prophet's identity in 1 Kings 20:41 powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and decisive revelation of God's truth in the person of Jesus Christ. Just as the prophet, through a veiled message and then a sudden unveiling, confronted Ahab with his sin and God's judgment, so too did Jesus come to unveil the Father's character and confront humanity with the truth of its sin and desperate need for salvation. He is the ultimate Prophet promised by God, greater than Moses, who speaks the very words of God with unparalleled authority, as prophesied in Deuteronomy 18:15, concerning a prophet like Moses and affirmed in Acts 3:22, in Peter's sermon on Jesus as the Prophet. While the prophet in 1 Kings 20 delivered a message of judgment for disobedience, Jesus, though also a prophet of judgment (see His woes against the Pharisees in Matthew 23), primarily came as the revelation of God's boundless grace and mercy, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. His life, sacrificial death, and glorious resurrection are the ultimate unveiling of God's redemptive plan for humanity, a truth that, when "discerned" by faith, leads not to condemnation but to eternal life, as proclaimed in John 14:6, where Jesus declares Himself the Way, the Truth, and the Life and John 3:16, on God's love for the world. Unlike Ahab, whose recognition led to hardened defiance and judgment, those who truly discern Jesus as the Christ are called to repentance and receive forgiveness, finding abundant and eternal life in His name.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 20 verses 31–43

Here is an account of what followed upon the victory which Israel obtained over the Syrians.

I. Ben-hadad's tame and mean submission. Even in his inner chamber he feared, and would, if he could, flee further, though none pursued. His servants, seeing him and themselves reduced to the last extremity, advised that they should surrender at discretion, and make themselves prisoners and petitioners to Ahab for their lives, Kg1 20:31. The servants will put their lives in their hands, and venture first, and their master will act according as they speed. Their inducement to take this course is the great reputation the kings of Israel had for clemency above any of their neighbours: "We have heard that they are merciful kings, not oppressive to their subjects that are under their power" (as governments then went, that of Israel was one of the most easy and gentle), "and therefore not cruel to their enemies when they lie at their mercy." Perhaps they had this notion of the kings of Israel because they had heard that the God of Israel proclaimed his name gracious and merciful, and they concluded their kings would make their God their pattern. It was an honour to the kings of Israel to be thus represented, as indeed every Israelite is then dressed as becomes him when he puts on bowels of mercies. "They are merciful kings, therefore we may hope to find mercy upon our submission." This encouragement poor sinners have to repent and humble themselves before God. "Have we not heard that the God of Israel is a merciful God? Have we not found him so? Let us therefore rend our hearts and return to him." Joe 2:13. That is evangelical repentance which flows from an apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ; there is forgiveness with him. Two things Ben-hadad's servants undertake to represent to Ahab: - 1. Their master a penitent; for they girded sackcloth on their loins, as mourners, and put ropes on their heads, as condemned criminals going to execution, pretending to be sorry that they had invaded his country and disturbed his repose, and owning that they deserved to be hanged for it. Here they are ready to do penance for it, and throw themselves at the feet of him whom they had injured. Many pretend to repent of their wrong-doing, when it does not succeed, who, if they had prospered in it, would have justified it and gloried in it. 2. Their master a beggar, a beggar for his life: Thy servant Ben-hadad saith, "I pray thee, let me live, Kg1 20:32. Though I live a perpetual exile from my own country, and captive in this, yet, upon any terms, let me live." What a great change is here, (1.) In his condition! How has he fallen from the height of power and prosperity to the depths of disgrace and distress, and all the miseries of poverty and slavery! See the uncertainty of human affairs; such turns are they subject to that the spoke which was uppermost may soon come to be undermost. (2.) In his temper - in the beginning of the chapter hectoring, swearing, and threatening, and none more high in his demands, but here crouching and whining and none more low in his requests! How meanly does he beg hi life at the hand of him upon whom he had there been trampling! The most haughty in prosperity are commonly most abject in adversity: an even spirit will be the same in both conditions. See how God glorified himself when he looks upon proud men and abases them, and hides them in the dust together, Job 40:11-13.

II. Ahab's foolish acceptance of his submission, and the league he suddenly made with him upon it. He was proud to be thus courted by him whom he had feared, and enquired for him with great tenderness: Is he yet alive? He is my brother, brother-king, though not brother-Israelite: and Ahab valued himself more upon his royalty than on his religion, and others accordingly. "Is he thy brother, Ahab? Did he use thee like a brother when he sent thee that barbarous message? Kg1 20:5, Kg1 20:6. Would he have called thee brother if he had been the conqueror? Would he now have called himself thy servant if he had not been reduced to the utmost strait? Canst thou suffer thyself to be thus imposed upon by a forced and counterfeit submission?" This word brother they caught at (Kg1 20:33), and were thereby encouraged to go and fetch him to the king. He that calls him brother will let him live. Let poor penitents hear God, in his word, calling them children (Jer 31:20), catch at it, echo to it, and call him Father. Ben-hadad, upon his submission, shall not only be honourably conveyed (he took him up into the chariot), but treated with as an ally (Kg1 20:34): he made a covenant with him, not consulting God's prophets, or the elders of the land, or himself, concerning what was fit to be insisted on, but, as if Ben-hadad had been conqueror, he shall make his own terms. He might now have demanded some of Ben-hadad's cities, when all of them lay at the mercy of his victorious army; but was content with the restitution of his own. He might now have demanded the stores, and treasures, and magazines of Damascus, to augment the wealth and strength of his own kingdom, but was content with a poor liberty, at his own expense, to build streets there, a point of honour and no advantage, or no more than what the kings of Syria had had in Samaria, though they had never had so much power as he had now to support the demand of it. With this covenant he sent him away, without so much as reproving him for his blasphemous reflections upon the God of Israel, for whose honour Ahab had no concern. Note, There are those on whom success is ill bestowed; they know not how to serve God, or their generation, or even their own true interests, with their prosperity. Let favour be shown to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness.

III. The reproof given to Ahab for his clemency to Ben-hadad and his covenant with him. It was given him by a prophet, in the name of the Lord, the Jews say by Micaiah, and not unlikely, for Ahab complains of him (Kg1 22:8) that he used to prophesy evil concerning him. This prophet designed to reprove Ahab by a parable, that he might oblige him to condemn himself, as Nathan and the woman of Tekoa did David. To make his parable the more plausible, he finds it necessary to put himself into the posture of a wounded soldier. 1. With some difficulty he gets himself wounded, for he would not wound himself with his own hands. He commanded one of his brother prophets, his neighbour, or companion (for so the word signifies), to smite him, and this in God's name (Kg1 20:35), but finds him not so willing to give the blow as he is to receive it; he refused to smite him: others, he thought, were forward enough to smite prophets, they need not smite one another. We cannot but think it was from a good principle he declined it. "If it must be done, let another do it, not I; I cannot find it in my heart to strike my friend." Good men can much more easily receive a wrongful blow than give one; yet because he disobeyed an express command of God (which was so much the worse if he was himself a prophet), like that other disobedient prophet (Kg1 13:24), he was presently slain by a lion, Kg1 20:36. This was intended, not only to show, in general, how provoking disobedience is (Col 3:6), but to intimate to Ahab (who no doubt was told the story) that if a good prophet were thus punished for sparing his friend and God's, when God said, Smite, of much sorer punishment should a wicked king be thought worthy, who spared his enemy and God's, when God said, Smite. Shall mortal man pretend to be more just than God, more pure or more compassionate than his Maker? We must be merciful as he is merciful, and not otherwise. The next he met with made no difficulty of smiting him (Volenti non fit injuria - He that asks for an injury is not wronged by it) and did it so that he wounded him, Kg1 20:37. He fetched blood with the blow, probably in his face. 2. Wounded as he was, and disguised with ashes that he might not be known to be a prophet, he made his application to the king in a story wherein he charged himself with such a crime as the king was now guilty of in sparing Ben-hadad, and waited for the king's judgment upon it. The case in short is this - A prisoner taken in the battle was committed to his custody by a man (we may suppose one that had authority over him as his superior officer) with this charge, If he be missing, thy life shall be for his life, Kg1 20:39. The prisoner has made his escape through his carelessness. Can the chancery in the king's breast relieve him against his captain, who demands his life in lieu of the prisoner's? "By no means," says the king, "thou shouldst either not have undertaken the trust or been more careful and faithful to it; there is no remedy (Currat lex - Let the law take its course), thou hast forfeited thy bond, and execution must go out upon it: So shall thy doom be, thou thyself hast decided it." Now the prophet has what he would have, puts off his disguise, and is known by Ahab himself to be a prophet (Kg1 20:41) and plainly tells him, "Thou art the man. Is it my doom? No, it is thine; thou thyself hast decided it. Out of thy own mouth art thou judged. God, thy superior and commander-in-chief, delivered into thy hands one plainly marked for destruction both by his own pride and God's providence, and thou hast not carelessly lost him, but wittingly and willingly dismissed him, and so hast been false to thy trust, and lost the end of thy victory; expect therefore no other than that thy life shall go for his life, which thou hast spared" (and so it did, Kg1 22:35), "and thy people for his people, whom likewise thou hast spared," and so they did afterwards, Kg2 10:32, Kg2 10:33. When their other sins brought them low, this came into the account. There is a time when keeping back the sword from blood is doing the work of the Lord deceitfully, Jer 48:10. Foolish pity spoils the city. 3. We are told how Ahab resented this reproof. He went to his house heavy and displeased (Kg1 20:43), not truly penitent, or seeking to undo what he had done amiss, but enraged at the prophet, exasperated against God (as if he had been too severe in the sentence passed upon him), and yet vexed at himself, every way out of humour, notwithstanding his victory. He who by his providence had mortified the pride of one king, by his word cast a damp upon the triumphs of another. Be wise therefore, O you kings! and be instructed to serve the Lord with fear and rejoice with trembling, Psa 2:10, Psa 2:11.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
ON THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS 20:1
In the course of these events Ahab’s indulgence toward a man who was notoriously impious and an open and arrogant despiser of divine majesty fully deserved to be condemned, just as Saul’s clemency toward the king of the Amalekites was reproached with good reason by Samuel; this is especially true if, as some commentators assert, the same prophet who had promised the victory in the name of God prescribed that a punishment was to be inflicted on Ben-hadad. On the other hand, a mild punishment should have been inflicted on Ahab and his subjects, if they were completely unaware of the will of God. But they could not ignore God’s will at all, because the prophet had told them ahead of time that the Arameans would be handed over to them, after the Arameans had violated the majesty of God with their impious insults.
John ChrysostomAD 407
DISCOURSE AGAINST JUDAIZING CHRISTIANS 4.2.3-7
After the second man had struck and wounded him, the prophet bound his own head with a bandage, covered his eyes and disguised himself. Why did he do this? He was going to accuse the king and condemn him for saving the life of the king of the Syrians. Now Ahab was an impious man and always a foe to the prophets. The prophet did not wish Ahab to recognize him and then drive him from his sight; if the king drove him away, he would not hear the prophet’s words of correction. So the prophet concealed his face and any statement of his business in the hope that this would give him the advantage when he did speak and that he might get the king to agree to the terms he wanted.When the king was passing by, the prophet called aloud to him and said, “Your servant went forth to the campaign of war. Behold, a man brought another man to me and said to me: ‘Guard this man for me. If he shall leap away and bound off, it will be your life for his life, or you will pay a talent of silver.’ And it happened that as your servant turned his eyes this way and that, the man was not there.” And the king of Israel said to him: “This is your judgment before me: You killed the man.” And the prophet hurried to take the bandage from his eyes, and the king of Israel recognized that he was one of the sons of the prophets. And he said to the king: “So says the Lord: ‘Because you let go from your hand a man worthy of death, it will be your life for his life, and our people for his people.’ ”
Do you see how not only God but also people make this kind of judgment because both God and people heed the end and the causes rather than the nature of what is done? Certainly even the king said to him, “This is your judgment before me: you killed the man.” You are a murderer, he said, because you let an enemy go. The prophet put on the bandage and presented the case as if it were not the king but somebody else on trial, so that the king might pass the proper sentence. And, in fact, this did happen. So after the king condemned him, the prophet tore off the bandage and said, “Because you let go from your hand a man worthy of death, it will be your life for his life and your people for his people.” Did you see what a penalty the king paid for his act of kindness? And what punishment he endured in return for his untimely sparing of his foe? The one who spared a life is punished; another, who killed a man, was held in esteem. Phinehas certainly killed two people in a single moment of time—a man and his wife; and after he killed them, he was given the honor of the priesthood. His act of bloodshed did not defile his hand; it even made them cleaner. So you see that he who struck him perishes; you see that he who spared a man’s life is punished, while he who refused to spare a life is held in esteem. Therefore, always look into the decrees of God before you consider the nature of your own actions. Whenever you find something that accords with his decree, approve that—and only that.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 20:41 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.