1 Kings 20:37

Translation
King James Version
Then he found another man, and said, Smite me, I pray thee. And the man smote him, so that in smiting he wounded him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then he found H4672 another H312 man H376, and said H559, Smite H5221 me, I pray thee. And the man H376 smote H5221 him, so that in smiting H5221 he wounded H6481 him.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The prophet went to another man and said, "Hit me!" The man struck him a blow and wounded him.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then the prophet found another man and said, “Strike me, please!” So the man struck him and wounded him,
Ask
American Standard Version
Then he found another man, and said, Smite me, I pray thee. And the man smote him, smiting and wounding him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then he found another man, and said, “Please strike me.” The man struck him, smiting and wounding him.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then he founde another man, and sayde, Smite mee, I pray thee. And the man smote him, and in smiting wounded him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And he findeth another man, and saith, `Smite me, I pray thee;' and the man smiteth him, smiting and wounding,
Ask
See also
1 Kings 20:35Exodus 21:12
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Ahab and Ben-Hadad
Ahab and Ben-Hadad View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,446 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 20:37 narrates a crucial moment in a prophetic encounter where a prophet, acting under divine instruction, secures a self-inflicted wound from a compliant man. This unusual and divinely orchestrated act of physical harm was a necessary component of the prophet's subsequent confrontation with King Ahab, serving as a powerful visual metaphor and a tangible sign of the impending judgment awaiting the king due to his profound disobedience in sparing Ben-Hadad, the king of Aram, against God's explicit command.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is intricately woven into the dramatic narrative of 1 Kings 20, immediately following King Ahab's unexpected and divinely granted victory over Ben-Hadad of Aram. God had explicitly delivered Ben-Hadad into Ahab's hand, expecting his utter destruction, a command Ahab notoriously failed to obey, instead making a covenant with the defeated king. The prophet's dramatic appearance and the divinely mandated self-inflicted wound serve as a carefully orchestrated prophetic sign, designed to confront Ahab with the severe consequences of his actions. Immediately preceding this verse, the prophet had sought a first man to strike him, who refused and was consequently struck down by a lion, vividly demonstrating the gravity of obeying a prophetic word from God (1 Kings 20:35-36). The compliance of the second man in 1 Kings 20:37 highlights the stark contrast in obedience and sets the stage for the prophet's direct confrontation with Ahab, where the wound would be revealed as a potent sign of judgment (1 Kings 20:38-42).

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Prophetic actions, often dramatic and highly symbolic, were a common and powerful feature of Old Testament prophecy, serving as visual sermons to convey God's messages to a largely pre-literate audience. Prophets like Isaiah (Isaiah 20:2-4), Jeremiah (Jeremiah 13:1-11), and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 4:1-17) frequently employed such theatrical displays to underscore the seriousness and divine origin of their pronouncements. In the context of ancient Near Eastern kingship, a king's actions, particularly concerning war and peace, were often seen as reflecting the will or displeasure of their gods. Ahab's decision to spare Ben-Hadad was not merely a political miscalculation but a direct affront to Yahweh's explicit command, which had decreed the Aramean king's utter destruction. The prophet's wound, therefore, served as a tangible, culturally recognizable sign of divine judgment against the king's profound defiance and disobedience.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within 1 Kings and the broader prophetic tradition. Firstly, it underscores the absolute necessity of obedience to divine command, contrasting the dire consequences of disobedience (the first man's death, Ahab's future judgment) with the prophet's own obedience in seeking the wound and the second man's compliance. This theme is central to the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where blessings follow obedience and curses follow disobedience, as outlined in Deuteronomy 28. Secondly, it exemplifies prophetic symbolism, where a physical act or condition serves as a potent visual metaphor for spiritual realities or future events. The prophet's wound is not random but a deliberate, divinely ordained sign representing the "wound" of judgment that will befall Ahab and his kingdom. This method of communication is seen throughout the prophetic books, where God uses tangible actions to convey intangible truths. Finally, the passage highlights the inevitable consequences of disobedience to God's explicit word, particularly for those in positions of leadership. Ahab's failure to "utterly destroy" Ben-Hadad, as commanded by God, directly leads to the pronouncement of his own destruction, foreshadowed by the prophet's self-inflicted injury (1 Kings 20:42).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • found (Hebrew, mâtsâʼ', H4672): The Hebrew verb מָצָא (mâtsâʼ) means "to come forth to, appear or exist; transitively, to attain, i.e. find or acquire." In this context, it signifies the prophet's deliberate and successful effort to locate someone willing to perform the required action after the first man's refusal. This "finding" is not accidental but implies divine providence, ensuring that the prophet's mission, despite initial setbacks, would be fulfilled. It highlights God's sovereignty in providing the means for His prophetic word to be enacted.
  • Smite (Hebrew, nâkâh', H5221): The Hebrew verb נָכָה (nâkâh) is a strong, versatile verb meaning "to strike (lightly or severely, literally or figuratively); beat, kill, wound." It often implies a forceful and effective blow, frequently used in contexts of battle or judgment. Here, its repetition ("smote him, so that in smiting he wounded [him]") underscores the deliberate, intentional nature of the act and its direct, impactful result. The prophet's request for this action emphasizes the necessity of a visible, physical mark for the prophetic sign to be effective and undeniable.
  • wounded (Hebrew, pâtsaʻ', H6481): The Hebrew root פָּצַע (pâtsaʻ) means "to split, i.e. wound." It denotes a physical injury, often one that breaks the skin or causes significant damage, confirming that the "smiting" was not merely a light tap but a blow severe enough to leave a visible, undeniable mark. The presence of a clear wound was critical for the prophet's disguise and subsequent revelation to King Ahab, serving as the tangible evidence of his prophetic commission and the symbolic representation of Ahab's impending judgment.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then he found another man,": This clause signifies the prophet's unwavering commitment to fulfilling God's command, even after the initial refusal and subsequent judgment upon the first man. It underscores the divine imperative and urgency behind the prophetic act, demonstrating God's provision for His will to be accomplished regardless of human resistance. The "another man" highlights that God's plan would not be thwarted.
  • "and said, Smite me, I pray thee.": The prophet's direct and unusual request emphasizes the extraordinary nature of the divine command he is enacting. The phrase "I pray thee" (נָא, na) adds a sense of earnest entreaty, indicating the prophet's sincere desire and the divine necessity for the man to comply with this strange, yet divinely mandated, request. It sets the stage for a moment of obedience that contrasts sharply with Ahab's later disobedience.
  • "And the man smote him, so that in smiting he wounded [him].": This describes the successful and precise execution of the prophet's request. The repetition of "smote" and "smiting" emphasizes the action itself, while "wounded [him]" confirms the desired outcome: a visible, physical injury. This wound was not accidental but the precise, intended result, crucial for the prophet's disguise and the subsequent delivery of God's message to King Ahab, making the symbolic nature of the act clear and impactful.

Literary Devices

The passage in 1 Kings 20:37 is rich with several potent literary devices. Foremost is Symbolism. The prophet's self-inflicted wound is not merely a physical injury but a powerful visual metaphor for the spiritual wound and judgment that will inevitably befall King Ahab and his kingdom for his profound disobedience in sparing Ben-Hadad. This act also serves as potent Foreshadowing, directly predicting the future consequences of Ahab's actions. Just as the prophet is "wounded" in fulfillment of a divine command, so too will Ahab be "wounded" by divine judgment, ultimately leading to his death in battle. Furthermore, there is a strong element of Dramatic Irony at play. The prophet's disguise and the seemingly random act of being wounded are understood by the audience as part of a meticulously orchestrated divine plan, while King Ahab remains entirely oblivious to the true significance of the prophet's state until the dramatic reveal. This disparity in knowledge heightens the tension and impact of the subsequent confrontation, making Ahab's eventual realization all the more impactful.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The peculiar event in 1 Kings 20:37 profoundly underscores the seriousness with which God views obedience to His commands, especially when those commands are delivered through His chosen messengers. The prophet's willingness to endure physical harm, and the second man's immediate compliance, highlight a divine economy where even seemingly bizarre or costly acts are integral to conveying God's righteous judgment and unwavering sovereignty. This incident serves as a stark reminder that God's word, whether in promise or warning, carries ultimate authority and consequence, demanding a response of faithful submission from His people and their leaders. It illustrates that God is not bound by conventional methods and will go to extraordinary lengths to ensure His message is heard and His will is accomplished.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The scene in 1 Kings 20:37, though set in a distant historical context with unique prophetic practices, offers enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It challenges us to consider the depth of our own obedience to God's revealed will, particularly when His commands seem counter-intuitive, personally costly, or demand a departure from our comfort zones. The prophet's willingness to be wounded for the sake of delivering God's message, and the second man's immediate compliance, stand in stark contrast to the first man's refusal and Ahab's ultimate disobedience. This narrative compels us to recognize that true faith is demonstrated not merely by intellectual assent but by active, sometimes sacrificial, submission to God's authority. It also reminds us that God often uses unconventional means to communicate His truth, urging us to remain spiritually attuned and open to His voice, whether through the clear teachings of Scripture, the prompting of the Holy Spirit, or the challenging circumstances of life. Our response to God's word, whether in immediate obedience or defiant resistance, inevitably shapes our destiny and reflects the measure of our trust in His perfect wisdom and sovereign plan.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life might God be calling you to an act of obedience that seems counter-intuitive or personally costly?
  • How does the prophet's willingness to suffer for God's message challenge your own commitment to sharing divine truth, even when it is difficult or unpopular?
  • What are some modern "disguises" or unconventional ways God might be communicating His will or warnings to you today, and how can you be more attentive to them?

FAQ

Why did the prophet specifically need to be wounded for this prophetic act?

Answer: The prophet needed to be wounded for several crucial reasons, primarily related to the symbolic nature of his message and his subsequent confrontation with King Ahab. First, the wound served as a powerful visual aid and a compelling prophetic sign. Old Testament prophets frequently employed dramatic, physical actions to embody and communicate God's message more powerfully than words alone. The visible wound on the prophet's face or head (1 Kings 20:38) was a tangible representation of the "wound" or judgment that would befall Ahab for his profound disobedience in sparing Ben-Hadad. Second, it was essential for the prophet's disguise. By covering his face with a bandage, the prophet could approach Ahab unrecognized, only to reveal his true identity and the profound significance of his wound at the climactic moment of confrontation. This element of surprise and revelation added dramatic impact to the divine pronouncement, ensuring Ahab's full attention. Finally, the wound underscored the seriousness of God's command and the dire consequences of disobedience. Just as the prophet willingly endured a wound to fulfill God's will, so too would Ahab face a "wound" of divine judgment for failing to execute God's command to utterly destroy Ben-Hadad, culminating in the pronouncement of his own death (1 Kings 20:42).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Kings 20:37 describes a prophet's symbolic suffering to convey a message of judgment, it ultimately points forward to the ultimate and redemptive fulfillment of prophetic suffering in Jesus Christ. The Old Testament prophet's wound, self-imposed yet divinely ordained, served as a tangible sign of impending judgment for disobedience. In a far deeper and infinitely more significant sense, Jesus, the ultimate Prophet and Son of God, willingly submitted to suffering and wounding, not for a symbolic message of judgment against others, but to bear the full weight of judgment for humanity's profound disobedience. He was "wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and by his stripes we are healed" (Isaiah 53:5). The prophet's wound in 1 Kings 20:37 was a temporary, external mark for a specific historical warning; Christ's wounds, however, were the very means of our eternal salvation, demonstrating God's perfect justice and boundless love. Through His willing sacrifice on the cross, Jesus became the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, offering reconciliation and healing where disobedience once brought condemnation. He became the prophet like Moses who would speak God's final word, fulfilling all prophetic types. Thus, the Old Testament prophetic act, though distinct, echoes the divine principle of suffering for a greater purpose, a principle perfectly embodied and infinitely surpassed in the person and redemptive work of our Lord Jesus Christ, who bore our sins in his body on the tree.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 20 verses 31–43

Here is an account of what followed upon the victory which Israel obtained over the Syrians.

I. Ben-hadad's tame and mean submission. Even in his inner chamber he feared, and would, if he could, flee further, though none pursued. His servants, seeing him and themselves reduced to the last extremity, advised that they should surrender at discretion, and make themselves prisoners and petitioners to Ahab for their lives, Kg1 20:31. The servants will put their lives in their hands, and venture first, and their master will act according as they speed. Their inducement to take this course is the great reputation the kings of Israel had for clemency above any of their neighbours: "We have heard that they are merciful kings, not oppressive to their subjects that are under their power" (as governments then went, that of Israel was one of the most easy and gentle), "and therefore not cruel to their enemies when they lie at their mercy." Perhaps they had this notion of the kings of Israel because they had heard that the God of Israel proclaimed his name gracious and merciful, and they concluded their kings would make their God their pattern. It was an honour to the kings of Israel to be thus represented, as indeed every Israelite is then dressed as becomes him when he puts on bowels of mercies. "They are merciful kings, therefore we may hope to find mercy upon our submission." This encouragement poor sinners have to repent and humble themselves before God. "Have we not heard that the God of Israel is a merciful God? Have we not found him so? Let us therefore rend our hearts and return to him." Joe 2:13. That is evangelical repentance which flows from an apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ; there is forgiveness with him. Two things Ben-hadad's servants undertake to represent to Ahab: - 1. Their master a penitent; for they girded sackcloth on their loins, as mourners, and put ropes on their heads, as condemned criminals going to execution, pretending to be sorry that they had invaded his country and disturbed his repose, and owning that they deserved to be hanged for it. Here they are ready to do penance for it, and throw themselves at the feet of him whom they had injured. Many pretend to repent of their wrong-doing, when it does not succeed, who, if they had prospered in it, would have justified it and gloried in it. 2. Their master a beggar, a beggar for his life: Thy servant Ben-hadad saith, "I pray thee, let me live, Kg1 20:32. Though I live a perpetual exile from my own country, and captive in this, yet, upon any terms, let me live." What a great change is here, (1.) In his condition! How has he fallen from the height of power and prosperity to the depths of disgrace and distress, and all the miseries of poverty and slavery! See the uncertainty of human affairs; such turns are they subject to that the spoke which was uppermost may soon come to be undermost. (2.) In his temper - in the beginning of the chapter hectoring, swearing, and threatening, and none more high in his demands, but here crouching and whining and none more low in his requests! How meanly does he beg hi life at the hand of him upon whom he had there been trampling! The most haughty in prosperity are commonly most abject in adversity: an even spirit will be the same in both conditions. See how God glorified himself when he looks upon proud men and abases them, and hides them in the dust together, Job 40:11-13.

II. Ahab's foolish acceptance of his submission, and the league he suddenly made with him upon it. He was proud to be thus courted by him whom he had feared, and enquired for him with great tenderness: Is he yet alive? He is my brother, brother-king, though not brother-Israelite: and Ahab valued himself more upon his royalty than on his religion, and others accordingly. "Is he thy brother, Ahab? Did he use thee like a brother when he sent thee that barbarous message? Kg1 20:5, Kg1 20:6. Would he have called thee brother if he had been the conqueror? Would he now have called himself thy servant if he had not been reduced to the utmost strait? Canst thou suffer thyself to be thus imposed upon by a forced and counterfeit submission?" This word brother they caught at (Kg1 20:33), and were thereby encouraged to go and fetch him to the king. He that calls him brother will let him live. Let poor penitents hear God, in his word, calling them children (Jer 31:20), catch at it, echo to it, and call him Father. Ben-hadad, upon his submission, shall not only be honourably conveyed (he took him up into the chariot), but treated with as an ally (Kg1 20:34): he made a covenant with him, not consulting God's prophets, or the elders of the land, or himself, concerning what was fit to be insisted on, but, as if Ben-hadad had been conqueror, he shall make his own terms. He might now have demanded some of Ben-hadad's cities, when all of them lay at the mercy of his victorious army; but was content with the restitution of his own. He might now have demanded the stores, and treasures, and magazines of Damascus, to augment the wealth and strength of his own kingdom, but was content with a poor liberty, at his own expense, to build streets there, a point of honour and no advantage, or no more than what the kings of Syria had had in Samaria, though they had never had so much power as he had now to support the demand of it. With this covenant he sent him away, without so much as reproving him for his blasphemous reflections upon the God of Israel, for whose honour Ahab had no concern. Note, There are those on whom success is ill bestowed; they know not how to serve God, or their generation, or even their own true interests, with their prosperity. Let favour be shown to the wicked, yet will he not learn righteousness.

III. The reproof given to Ahab for his clemency to Ben-hadad and his covenant with him. It was given him by a prophet, in the name of the Lord, the Jews say by Micaiah, and not unlikely, for Ahab complains of him (Kg1 22:8) that he used to prophesy evil concerning him. This prophet designed to reprove Ahab by a parable, that he might oblige him to condemn himself, as Nathan and the woman of Tekoa did David. To make his parable the more plausible, he finds it necessary to put himself into the posture of a wounded soldier. 1. With some difficulty he gets himself wounded, for he would not wound himself with his own hands. He commanded one of his brother prophets, his neighbour, or companion (for so the word signifies), to smite him, and this in God's name (Kg1 20:35), but finds him not so willing to give the blow as he is to receive it; he refused to smite him: others, he thought, were forward enough to smite prophets, they need not smite one another. We cannot but think it was from a good principle he declined it. "If it must be done, let another do it, not I; I cannot find it in my heart to strike my friend." Good men can much more easily receive a wrongful blow than give one; yet because he disobeyed an express command of God (which was so much the worse if he was himself a prophet), like that other disobedient prophet (Kg1 13:24), he was presently slain by a lion, Kg1 20:36. This was intended, not only to show, in general, how provoking disobedience is (Col 3:6), but to intimate to Ahab (who no doubt was told the story) that if a good prophet were thus punished for sparing his friend and God's, when God said, Smite, of much sorer punishment should a wicked king be thought worthy, who spared his enemy and God's, when God said, Smite. Shall mortal man pretend to be more just than God, more pure or more compassionate than his Maker? We must be merciful as he is merciful, and not otherwise. The next he met with made no difficulty of smiting him (Volenti non fit injuria - He that asks for an injury is not wronged by it) and did it so that he wounded him, Kg1 20:37. He fetched blood with the blow, probably in his face. 2. Wounded as he was, and disguised with ashes that he might not be known to be a prophet, he made his application to the king in a story wherein he charged himself with such a crime as the king was now guilty of in sparing Ben-hadad, and waited for the king's judgment upon it. The case in short is this - A prisoner taken in the battle was committed to his custody by a man (we may suppose one that had authority over him as his superior officer) with this charge, If he be missing, thy life shall be for his life, Kg1 20:39. The prisoner has made his escape through his carelessness. Can the chancery in the king's breast relieve him against his captain, who demands his life in lieu of the prisoner's? "By no means," says the king, "thou shouldst either not have undertaken the trust or been more careful and faithful to it; there is no remedy (Currat lex - Let the law take its course), thou hast forfeited thy bond, and execution must go out upon it: So shall thy doom be, thou thyself hast decided it." Now the prophet has what he would have, puts off his disguise, and is known by Ahab himself to be a prophet (Kg1 20:41) and plainly tells him, "Thou art the man. Is it my doom? No, it is thine; thou thyself hast decided it. Out of thy own mouth art thou judged. God, thy superior and commander-in-chief, delivered into thy hands one plainly marked for destruction both by his own pride and God's providence, and thou hast not carelessly lost him, but wittingly and willingly dismissed him, and so hast been false to thy trust, and lost the end of thy victory; expect therefore no other than that thy life shall go for his life, which thou hast spared" (and so it did, Kg1 22:35), "and thy people for his people, whom likewise thou hast spared," and so they did afterwards, Kg2 10:32, Kg2 10:33. When their other sins brought them low, this came into the account. There is a time when keeping back the sword from blood is doing the work of the Lord deceitfully, Jer 48:10. Foolish pity spoils the city. 3. We are told how Ahab resented this reproof. He went to his house heavy and displeased (Kg1 20:43), not truly penitent, or seeking to undo what he had done amiss, but enraged at the prophet, exasperated against God (as if he had been too severe in the sentence passed upon him), and yet vexed at himself, every way out of humour, notwithstanding his victory. He who by his providence had mortified the pride of one king, by his word cast a damp upon the triumphs of another. Be wise therefore, O you kings! and be instructed to serve the Lord with fear and rejoice with trembling, Psa 2:10, Psa 2:11.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–43. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
DISCOURSE AGAINST JUDAIZING CHRISTIANS 4.2.1-2
Ahab once captured a king of Syria and, contrary to God’s decree, saved his life. He had the Syrian king enjoy a seat by his side and sent him off with great honor. About that time a prophet came to his companion and said to him, “In the word of the Lord, strike me.” But his companion was not willing to strike him. And the prophet said to him, “Because you would not listen to the word of the Lord, behold, you will depart from me, and a lion will strike you.” And he departed from him, and the lion found him and struck him. Then the prophet found another man and said, “Strike me.” And the man did strike him and wounded him, and the prophet bandaged up his own face.What greater paradox than this could there be? The man who struck the prophet was saved; the one who spared the prophet was punished. Why? That you may learn that when God commands, you must not question too much the nature of the action; you have only to obey. So that the first man might not spare him out of reverence, the prophet did not simply say “strike me” but said “strike me, in the word of God.” That is, God commands it; seek no further. It is the King who ordains it; reverence the rank of him who commands and with all eagerness heed his word. But the man lacked the courage to strike him and, on this account, he paid the ultimate penalty. But by the punishment he subsequently suffered, he encourages us to yield and obey God’s every command.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 20:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.