Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, that he saddled for him the ass, to wit, for the prophet whom he had brought back.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And it came to pass, after H310 he had eaten H398 bread H3899, and after H310 he had drunk H8354, that he saddled H2280 for him the ass H2543, to wit, for the prophet H5030 whom he had brought back H7725.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
After he had eaten food and drunk, he saddled the donkey for the prophet he had brought back.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And after the man of God had finished eating and drinking, the old prophet who had brought him back saddled the donkey for him.
Ask
American Standard Version
And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, that he saddled for him the ass, to wit, for the prophet whom he had brought back.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
After he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk, he saddled the donkey for the prophet whom he had brought back.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when he had eaten bread and drunke, he sadled him the asse, to wit, to the Prophet whome he had brought againe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And it cometh to pass, after his eating bread, and after his drinking, that he saddleth for him the ass, for the prophet whom he had brought back,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
The Sins of Jeroboam
The Sins of Jeroboam View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,208 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse captures the solemn moment immediately following the man of God's fateful act of disobedience, detailing the old prophet's preparation of the ass for the man of God's departure from Bethel. Having tragically succumbed to deception and violated God's explicit command not to eat or drink in that idolatrous place, the man of God is now set on a path that will swiftly lead to divine judgment, starkly illustrating the severe and unyielding consequences of even a single act of rebellion against a clear and direct divine directive.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is intricately woven into the dramatic and tragic narrative of 1 Kings 13, which serves as a pivotal account in the early history of the divided monarchy. The chapter begins with the unnamed man of God from Judah delivering a powerful, divinely ordained prophecy against King Jeroboam's idolatrous altar at Bethel (1 Kings 13:1-5). Central to his mission was a strict, unambiguous command from the Lord: he was neither to eat bread nor drink water in Bethel, nor was he to return by the same way he came (1 Kings 13:9). After initially resisting Jeroboam's enticements, the man of God tragically falls prey to the deception of an old prophet from Bethel, who falsely claims to have received a new, contradictory revelation from an angel (1 Kings 13:18). Verse 23, therefore, describes the man of God's preparations for his journey after he has committed the forbidden act of eating and drinking, serving as the immediate narrative bridge to the swift and severe divine judgment that unfolds in the very next verses (1 Kings 13:24-25).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of 1 Kings 13 are set against the turbulent backdrop of the newly divided kingdom of Israel, specifically during the reign of Jeroboam I. Following the schism, Jeroboam, fearing that his subjects would return to Jerusalem to worship at the Temple and thereby shift their allegiance back to the Davidic dynasty, established alternative, idolatrous worship centers at Bethel and Dan (1 Kings 12:26-33). Bethel, though historically revered as a site of divine encounter for Jacob (Genesis 28:10-19), had been profoundly corrupted into a hub of syncretistic worship and idolatry under Jeroboam. The cultural context of ancient Near Eastern hospitality is subtly at play, as the old prophet uses it as a vehicle for his deception. This narrative vividly illustrates the grave consequences of prophetic disobedience and the absolute nature of divine commands, particularly in a period where God was actively contending against the widespread idolatry and moral decay in Israel.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within 1 Kings 13 and the broader Deuteronomistic History, which emphasizes the covenantal relationship between God and Israel. Foremost is the absolute necessity of obedience to divine command, especially for those entrusted with prophetic ministry. The man of God's initial unwavering faithfulness and miraculous power are tragically overshadowed by his single act of disobedience, demonstrating that God's word is immutable and not subject to human reinterpretation or deceptive "new revelations." Another critical theme is the peril of deception and the paramount importance of spiritual discernment. The old prophet's cunning manipulation underscores the spiritual danger of listening to voices that contradict a clear word from God, even if they appear to come from a seemingly legitimate or pious source (1 John 4:1). Finally, the verse immediately precedes and thus powerfully sets the stage for the theme of swift and certain divine judgment. Although the judgment itself is not depicted in this verse, the preparation for the man of God's journey immediately after his sin signals the impending fulfillment of the old prophet's own prophecy of doom against the man of God (1 Kings 13:21-22), illustrating God's unwavering holiness and His demand for fidelity from His servants.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • eaten (Hebrew, ʼâkal', H398): This primitive root signifies "to eat" or "to consume," whether literally or figuratively. In 1 Kings 13:23, its use highlights the completion of the man of God's forbidden act. The verb emphasizes the physical consumption of food, directly violating God's explicit command not to eat bread in Bethel (1 Kings 13:9). This act of eating, though seemingly innocuous, represents a profound spiritual transgression.
  • drunk (Hebrew, shâthâh', H8354): This primitive root means "to imbibe" or "to drink." Like "eaten," its presence here confirms the full extent of the man of God's disobedience, as he also consumed water, which was explicitly forbidden by the Lord (1 Kings 13:9). The inclusion of both "eaten" and "drunk" underscores the comprehensive nature of his transgression against the divine prohibition.
  • saddled (Hebrew, châbash', H2280): This verb means "to wrap firmly," "to bind," or "to saddle." Here, it describes the old prophet's action of preparing the donkey for the man of God's departure. This seemingly helpful act is imbued with profound irony, as the old prophet, who was the instrument of the man of God's sin, now facilitates his journey towards the very judgment that his deception provoked. It highlights the deceiver's active role in not just tempting, but also enabling the path to destruction.
  • brought back (Hebrew, shûwb', H7725): This primitive root means "to turn back" or "to return." In the phrase "the prophet whom he had brought back," it succinctly captures the old prophet's successful manipulation. The man of God was "brought back" from his divinely appointed path of immediate departure and strict obedience, diverted by the false prophecy. This word emphasizes the old prophet's culpability and the man of God's tragic deviation from his mission.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And it came to pass, after he had eaten bread, and after he had drunk": This opening clause immediately establishes the temporal context, emphasizing that the subsequent actions occur after the man of God has definitively violated God's explicit command not to eat or drink in Bethel. The repetition of the forbidden actions ("eaten bread, and... drunk") serves as a solemn and stark reminder of the precise nature of the transgression, setting the stage for the inevitable consequences.
  • "that he saddled for him the ass": This clause reveals the action of the old prophet. The subject "he" refers to the old prophet, who, having successfully deceived the man of God into disobedience, now prepares the means for his departure. This act, while outwardly appearing as a gesture of hospitality or assistance, is deeply ironic and sinister, as it directly facilitates the man of God's journey towards his divinely ordained punishment.
  • "[to wit], for the prophet whom he had brought back": The archaic phrase "to wit" clarifies the identity of the recipient of the old prophet's action: the man of God from Judah. The crucial addition "whom he had brought back" explicitly highlights the old prophet's direct and successful involvement in leading the man of God astray from his original, divinely commanded path. It serves as a poignant and final reminder of the old prophet's deceptive triumph and the man of God's tragic deviation from his mission.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 1 Kings 13:23 is rich with literary devices that amplify its theological and dramatic impact. Irony is profoundly present, as the old prophet, who delivered the false prophecy that led the man of God into sin, now performs the seemingly helpful act of saddling the ass for his departure. This "help" is, in fact, a chilling facilitation of the man of God's journey towards the very divine judgment that the old prophet himself had just prophesied would befall him (1 Kings 13:21-22). This creates a powerful sense of the deceiver's complicity and underscores the insidious nature of sin, where the path to destruction can be paved with seemingly innocuous or even benevolent actions. Furthermore, the verse employs foreshadowing, as the immediate preparation for the man of God's journey after his transgression signals the imminent and unavoidable divine judgment that is about to unfold. The act of saddling the ass is not merely a practical detail but a narrative cue that the consequences of disobedience are at hand. There is also an element of contrast between the man of God's initial unwavering obedience and miraculous power at the beginning of the chapter and his ultimate vulnerability to deception and subsequent fall, underscoring the fragility of even strong faith when divine commands are compromised.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse, though seemingly a simple logistical detail, functions as a crucial hinge point in the narrative, marking the immediate aftermath of a profound act of disobedience and setting the stage for swift divine judgment. Theologically, it underscores the absolute necessity of unwavering obedience to God's explicit commands, particularly for those called to prophetic ministry or leadership. The man of God's failure, despite his initial faithfulness and the powerful signs he performed, illustrates that God holds His servants to an exceptionally high standard, and even a single act of rebellion against a clear divine directive can have severe and irreversible consequences. It also highlights the insidious nature of deception, reminding believers that not all claims of divine revelation are trustworthy, especially if they contradict established truth or a previous, clear word from God. The verse thus functions as a solemn warning against spiritual complacency, the dangers of compromising divine truth for the sake of human persuasion or comfort, and the critical importance of discerning spirits.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The stark reality presented in 1 Kings 13:23 and the subsequent judgment serve as a powerful and sobering reminder for believers in every generation. This passage compels us to deeply examine the sincerity and depth of our own commitment to God's revealed will. In a world saturated with competing voices, ideologies, and even spiritual claims, the tragic story of the man of God underscores the critical importance of cultivating profound spiritual discernment to distinguish truth from error. This is especially vital when "new revelations" or seemingly well-intentioned advice appear to contradict the clear, established word of God. Our obedience is not merely a matter of following rules; it is the ultimate expression of our trust in God's perfect wisdom, His sovereign authority, and His unwavering holiness. This passage challenges us to cultivate an intimate and personal relationship with God, enabling us to hear His voice clearly through His Word and to stand firm against all forms of deception, recognizing that even subtle deviations from His path can lead to tragic and far-reaching outcomes. It calls us to vigilance, humility, and an unwavering commitment to the integrity and authority of God's word in every aspect of our lives, ensuring that our foundation is built on His unchanging truth.

Questions for Reflection

  • How can I cultivate deeper spiritual discernment to distinguish between genuine divine guidance and deceptive influences, especially when they come from seemingly spiritual or trusted sources?
  • What specific areas in my life might tempt me to compromise a clear command from God for the sake of comfort, convenience, or the approval of others?
  • How does the swiftness and severity of the man of God's judgment impact my understanding of God's holiness, His justice, and the profound gravity of obedience to His commands?

FAQ

Why was the man of God's disobedience considered so severe, given he was deceived?

Answer: While the man of God was indeed deceived, his disobedience was considered severe because it directly violated an explicit and unambiguous command from God, delivered personally to him (1 Kings 13:9). As a prophet, he was expected to be a direct recipient and faithful messenger of God's word. His primary allegiance and source of truth should have been God Himself, not a secondary "revelation" that contradicted the first, even if presented by another prophet. The narrative emphasizes that God's word is paramount and unchangeable, and compromising it, even under duress or deception, carries grave consequences, particularly for those who represent Him. This highlights the principle of personal accountability and the critical need for discernment (1 John 4:1), especially when a new message contradicts a previously clear divine instruction.

What is the significance of the old prophet saddling the ass for the man of God?

Answer: The act of the old prophet saddling the ass for the man of God is deeply significant and laden with irony. Having successfully lured the man of God into disobedience through deception (1 Kings 13:18), the old prophet now facilitates his departure. This seemingly helpful gesture is, in reality, an act that enables the man of God's journey towards his divinely appointed judgment. It underscores the old prophet's continued role in the man of God's downfall, not just as the source of temptation but as an active participant in setting the stage for the tragic consequences. It also serves as a chilling reminder that those who lead others astray may even appear to offer assistance, yet their actions ultimately guide the deceived down a path of destruction.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of the man of God's disobedience and its swift consequences in 1 Kings 13:23 powerfully foreshadows and contrasts with the perfect obedience of Jesus Christ. Unlike the man of God who succumbed to temptation and violated a clear divine command, Jesus consistently demonstrated absolute and unwavering obedience to the Father's will, even unto death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). Where the man of God's single act of disobedience brought judgment upon himself, Jesus' perfect obedience, culminating in His sacrificial death, became the means of salvation and righteousness for all who believe (Romans 5:19). The judgment that fell upon the disobedient prophet points to the ultimate judgment for sin, a judgment that Jesus, the obedient Lamb of God, willingly bore in our place, taking upon Himself the curse we deserved (Isaiah 53:5-6). Furthermore, while the old prophet's deception led the man of God astray, Jesus, as the Good Shepherd, protects His sheep from deception and leads them in paths of righteousness and eternal life, for His sheep hear His voice and follow Him (John 10:27-28). The story of 1 Kings 13:23 thus serves as a stark reminder of humanity's propensity to fail and the dire consequences of disobedience, simultaneously amplifying the glorious truth of Christ's perfect obedience and His redemptive work, which offers forgiveness, reconciliation, and new life where human effort and faithfulness fall tragically short (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 13 verses 23–34

Here is, I. The death of the deceived disobedient prophet. The old prophet that had deluded him, as if he would make him some amends for the wrong he had done him or help to prevent the mischief threatened him, furnished him with an ass to ride home on; but by the way a lion set upon him, and killed him, Kg1 13:23, Kg1 13:24. He did but return back to refresh himself when he was hungry, and behold he must die for it; see Sa1 14:43. But we must consider, 1. That his offence was great, and it would by no means justify him that he was drawn into it by a lie; he could not be so certain of the countermand sent by another as he was of the command given to himself, nor had he any ground to think that the command would be recalled, when the reason of it remained in force, which was that he might testify his detestation of the wickedness of that place. He had great reason to suspect the honesty of this old prophet, who did not himself bear his testimony, nor did God think fit to make use of him as a witness against the idolatry of the city he lived in. However, he should have taken time to beg direction from God, and not have complied so soon. Did he think this old prophet's house safer to eat in than other houses at Beth-el, when God had forbidden him to eat in any? That was to refine upon the command, and make himself wiser than God. Did he think to excuse himself that he was hungry? Had he never read that man lives not by bread alone? 2. That his death was for the glory of God; for by this it appeared, (1.) That nothing is more provoking to him than disobedience to an express command, though in a small matter, which makes his proceedings against our first parents, for eating the forbidden fruit, the easier to be accounted for. (2.) That God is displeased at the sins of his own people, and no man shall be protected in disobedience by the sanctity of his profession, the dignity of his office, his nearness to God, or any good services he has done for him. Perhaps God by this intended, in a way of righteous judgment, to harden Jeroboam's heart, since he was not reformed by the withering of his hand; for he would be apt to make a bad use of it, and to say that the prophet was well enough served for meddling with his altar, he had better have staid at home; any, he would say that Providence had punished him for his insolence, and the lion had done that which his withered hand might not do. However, by this God intended to warn all those whom he employs strictly to observe their orders, at their peril.

II. The wonderful preservation of his dead body, which was a token of God's mercy remembered in the midst of wrath. The lion that gently strangled him, or tore him, did not devour his dead body, nor so much as tear the ass, Kg1 13:24, Kg1 13:25, Kg1 13:26. Nay, what was more, he did not set upon the travellers that passed by and saw it, nor upon the old prophet (who had reason enough to fear it) when he came to take up the corpse. His commission was to kill the prophet; hitherto he should go, but no further. Thus God showed that, though he was angry with him, his anger was turned away, and the punishment went no further than death.

III. The care which the old prophet took of his burial. When he heard of this unusual accident, he concluded it was the man of God, who was disobedient to his Master (and whose fault was that?), therefore the Lord has delivered him to the lion, Kg1 13:26. It would well have become him to ask why the lion was not sent against him and his house, rather than against the good man whom he had cheated. He took up the corpse, Kg1 13:29. If there by any truth in the vulgar opinion, surely the corpse bled afresh when he touched it, for he was in effect the murderer, and it was but a poor reparation for the injury to inter the dead body. Perhaps when he cheated him into his ruin he intended to laugh at him; yet now his conscience so far relents that he weeps over him, and, like Joab at Abner's funeral, is compelled to be a mourner for him whom he had been the death of. They said, Alas! my brother, Kg1 13:30. The case was indeed very lamentable that so good a man, a prophet so faithful, and so bold in God's cause, should, for one offence, die as a criminal, while an old lying prophet lives at ease and an idolatrous prince in pomp and power. Thy way, O God! is in the sea, and thy path in the great waters. We cannot judge of men by their sufferings, nor of sins by their present punishments; with some the flesh is destroyed that the spirit may be saved, while with others the flesh is pampered that the soul may ripen for hell.

IV. The charge which the old prophet gave his sons concerning his own burial, that they should be sure to bury him in the same grave where the man of God was buried (Kg1 13:3): "Lay my bones beside his bones, close by them, as near as may be, so that my dust may mingle with his." Though he was a lying prophet, yet he desired to die the death of a true prophet. "Gather not my soul with the sinners of Beth-el, but with the man of God." The reason he gives is because what he cried against the altar of Beth-el, that men's bones should be burnt upon it, shall surely come to pass, Kg1 13:32. Thus, 1. He ratifies the prediction, that out of the mouth of two witnesses (and one of them such a one as St. Paul quotes, Tit 1:12, one of themselves, even a prophet of their own) the word might be established, if possible to convince and reclaim Jeroboam. 2. He does honour to the deceased prophet, as one whose word would not fall to the ground, though he did. Ministers die, die prematurely it may be; but the word of the Lord endures for ever, and does not die with them. 3. He consults his own interest. It was foretold that men's bones should be burnt upon Jeroboam's altar: "Lay mine (says he) close to his, and then they will not be disturbed;" and it was, accordingly, their security, as we find, Kg2 23:18. Sleeping and waking, living and dying, it is safe being in good company. No mention is made here of the inscription on the prophet's tomb; but it is spoken of Kg2 23:17, where Josiah asks, What title is that? and is told, It is the sepulchre of the man of God that came from Judah, who proclaimed these things which thou hast done; so that the epitaph upon the prophet's grave preserved the remembrance of his prophecy, and was a standing testimony against the idolatries of Beth-el, which it would not have been so remarkably if he had died and been buried elsewhere. The cities of Israel are here called cities of Samaria, though that name was not yet known; for, however the old prophet spoke, the inspired historian wrote in the language of his own time.

V. The obstinacy of Jeroboam in his idolatry (Kg1 13:33): He returned not from his evil way; some hand was found that durst repair the altar God had rent, and then Jeroboam offered sacrifice on it again, and the more boldly because the prophet who disturbed him before was in his grave (Rev 11:10) and because the prophecy was for a great while to come. Various methods had been used to reclaim him, but neither threats nor signs, neither judgments nor mercies, wrought upon him, so strangely was he wedded to his calves. He did not reform, no, not his priesthood, but whoever would, he filled his hand, and made him priest, though ever so illiterate or immoral, and of what tribe soever; and this became sin, that is, a snare first, and then a ruin, to Jeroboam's house, to cut if off, Kg1 13:34. Note, The diminution, disquiet, and desolation of families, are the fruit of sin; he promised himself that the calves would secure the crown to his family, but it proved they lost it, and sunk his family. Those betray themselves that think by any sin to support themselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 23–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 13:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.