TRV
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 28,654 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Corinthians 12 verses 12–26
12 ¶ For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.
13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
14 For the body is not one member, but many.
15 If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
16 And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?
18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him.
19 And if they were all one member, where were the body?
20 But now are they many members, yet but one body.
21 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you.
22 Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary:
23 And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness.
24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked:
25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another.
26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.
The apostle here makes out the truth of what was above asserted, and puts the gifted men among the Corinthians in mind of their duty, by comparing the church of Christ to a human body.
I. By telling us that one body may have many members, and that the many members of the same body make but one body (Co1 12:12): As the body is one, and hath many members, and all members of that one body, being many, are one body, so also is Christ; that is, Christ mystical, as divines commonly speak. Christ and his church making one body, as head and members, this body is made up of many parts or members, yet but one body; for all the members are baptized into the same body, and made to drink of the same Spirit, Co1 12:13. Jews and Gentiles, bond and free, are upon a level in this: all are baptized into the same body, and made partakers of the same Spirit. Christians become members of this body by baptism: they are baptized into one body. The outward rite is of divine institution, significant of the new birth, called therefore the washing of regeneration, Tit 3:5. But it is by the Spirit, by the renewing of the Holy Ghost, that we are made members of Christ's body. It is the Spirit's operation, signified by the outward administration, that makes us members. And by communion at the other ordinance we are sustained; but then it is not merely by drinking the wine, but by drinking into one Spirit. The outward administration is a means appointed of God for our participation in this great benefit; but it is baptism by the Spirit, it is internal renovation and drinking into one Spirit, partaking of his sanctifying influence from time to time, that makes us true members of Christ's body, and maintains our union with him. Being animated by one Spirit makes Christians one body. Note, All who have the spirit of Christ, without difference, are the members of Christ, whether Jew or Gentile, bond or free; and none but such. And all the members of Christ make up one body; the members many, but the body one. They are one body, because they have one principle of life; all are quickened and animated by the same Spirit.
II. Each member has its particular form, place, and use. 1. The meanest member makes a part of the body. The foot and ear are less useful, perhaps, than the hand and eye; but because one is not a hand, and the other an eye, shall they say, therefore, that they do not belong to the body? Co1 12:15, Co1 12:16. So every member of the body mystical cannot have the same place and office; but what then? Shall it hereupon disown relation to the body? Because it is not fixed in the same station, or favoured with the same gifts as others, shall it say, "I do not belong to Christ?" No, the meanest member of his body is as much a member as the noblest, and as truly regarded by him. All his members are dear to him. 2. There must be a distinction of members in the body: Were the whole body eye, where were the hearing? Were the whole ear, where were the smelling? Co1 12:17. If all were one member, where were the body? Co1 12:19. They are many members, and for that reason must have distinction among them, and yet are but one body, Co1 12:20. One member of a body is not a body; this is made up of many; and among these many there must be a distinction, difference of situation, shape, use, etc. So it is in the body of Christ; its members must have different uses, and therefore have different powers, and be in different places, some having one gift, and others a different one. Variety in the members of the body contributes to the beauty of it. What a monster would a body be if it were all ear, or eye, or arm! So it is for the beauty and good appearance of the church that there should be diversity of gifts and offices in it. 3. The disposal of members in a natural body, and their situation, are as God pleases: But now hath God set the members, every one of them, in the body, as it hath pleased him, Co1 12:18. We may plainly perceive the divine wisdom in the distribution of the members; but it was made according to the counsel of his will; he distinguished and distributed them as he pleased. So is it also in the members of Christ's body: they are chosen out to such stations, and endued with such gifts, as God pleases. He who is sovereign Lord of all disposes his favours and gifts as he will. And who should gainsay his pleasure? What foundation is here for repining in ourselves, or envying others? We should be doing the duties of our own place, and not murmuring in ourselves, nor quarrelling with others, that we are not in theirs. 4. All the members of the body are, in some respect, useful and necessary to each other: The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of thee; nor the head to the feet, I have no need of your: nay, those members of the body which seem to be more feeble (the bowels, etc.) are necessary (Co1 12:21, Co1 12:22); God has so fitted and tempered them together that they are all necessary to one another, and to the whole body; there is no part redundant and unnecessary. Every member serves some good purpose or other: it is useful to its fellow-members, and necessary to the good state of the whole body. Nor is there a member of the body of Christ but may and ought to be useful to his fellow-members, and at some times, and in some cases, is needful to them. None should despise and envy another, seeing God has made the distinction between them as he pleased, yet so as to keep them all in some degree of mutual dependence, and make them valuable to each other, and concerned for each other, because of their mutual usefulness. Those who excel in any gift cannot say that they have no need of those who in that gift are their inferiors, while perhaps, in other gifts, they exceed them. Nay, the lowest members of all have their use, and the highest cannot do well without them. The eye has need of the hand, and the head of the feet. 5. Such is the man's concern for his whole body that on the less honourable members more abundant honour is bestowed, and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness. Those parts which are not fit, like the rest, to be exposed to view, which are either deformed or shameful, we most carefully clothe and cover; whereas the comely parts have no such need. The wisdom of Providence has so contrived and tempered things that the most abundant regard and honour should be paid to that which most wanted it, Co1 12:24. So should the members of Christ's body behave towards their fellow-members: instead of despising them, or reproaching them, for their infirmities, they should endeavour to cover and conceal them, and put the best face upon them that they can. 6. Divine wisdom has contrived and ordered things in this manner that the members of the body should not be schismatics, divided from each other and acting upon separate interests, but well affected to each other, tenderly concerned for each other, having a fellow-feeling of each other's griefs and a communion in each other's pleasures and joys, Co1 12:25, Co1 12:26. God has tempered the members of the body natural in the manner mentioned, that there might be no schism in the body (Co1 12:25), no rupture nor disunion among the members, nor so much as the least mutual disregard. This should be avoided also in the spiritual body of Christ. There should be no schism in this body, but the members should be closely united by the strongest bonds of love. All decays of this affection are the seeds of schism. Where Christians grow cold towards each other, they will be careless and unconcerned for each other. And this mutual disregard is a schism begun. The members of the natural body are made to have a care and concern for each other, to prevent a schism in it. So should it be in Christ's body; the members should sympathize with each other. As in the natural body the pain of the one part afflicts the whole, the ease and pleasure of one part affects the whole, so should Christians reckon themselves honoured in the honours of their fellow-christians, and should suffer in their sufferings. Note, Christian sympathy is a great branch of Christian duty. We should be so far from slighting our brethren's sufferings that we should suffer with them, so far from envying their honours that we should rejoice with them and reckon ourselves honoured in them.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 12–26. Public domain.
Copy as
AmbrosiasterAD 384
COMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
If everyone in the church were equal, there would be no body, because a body is governed according to the difference in the functions of its members.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on 1 Corinthians 30
"And if they were all one member, where were the body?"
"But now are they many members, but one body."
Thus having silenced them sufficiently by God's own arrangement, again he states reasons. And he neither doth this always nor that, but alternates and varies his discourse. Since on the one hand, he who merely silences, confounds the hearer, and he, on the contrary, who accustoms him to demand reasons for all things, injures him in the matter of faith; for this cause then Paul is continually practising both the one and the other, that they may both believe and may not be confounded; and after silencing them, he again gives a reason likewise. And mark his earnestness in the combat and the completeness of his victory. For from what things they supposed themselves unequal in honor because in them there was great diversity, even from these things he shows that for this very reason they are equal in honor. How, I will tell you. "If all were one member," saith he, "where were the body?" Now what he means is, If there were not among you great variety, ye could not be a body; and not being a body, ye could not be one; and not being one, ye could not be equal in honor. Whence it follows again that if ye were all equal in honor, ye were not a body; and not being a body, ye were not one; and not being one, how could ye be equal in honor? As it is, however, because ye are not all endowed with some one gift, therefore are ye a body; and being a body, ye are all one, and differ nothing from one another in this that ye are a body. So that this very difference is that which chiefly causeth your equality in honor. And accordingly he adds, "But now they are many members, yet one body."
CS LewisAD 1963
The Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis, Volume 3, 1950-1963, To Mary Van Deusen, 7/12/50, page 68
The only rite which we know to have been instituted by Our Lord Himself is the Holy Communion ('Do this in remembrance of me' - 'If you do not eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, ye have no life in you'). This is an order and must be obeyed. The other services are, I take it, traditional and might lawfully be altered. But the New Testament does not envisage solitary religion: some kind of regular assembly for worship and instruction is everywhere taken for granted in the Epistles. So we must be regular practising members of the Church.
Of course we differ in temperament. Some (like you - and me) find it more natural to approach God in solitude: but we must go to church as well. Others find it easier to approach Him through the services: but they must practice private prayer and reading as well. For the Church is not a human society of people united by their natural affinities but the Body of Christ in which all members however different (and He rejoices in their differences and by no means wishes to iron them out) must share the common life, complementing and helping and receiving one another precisely by their differences. (Re-read 1st Corinthians cap 12 and meditate on it. The word translated members would perhaps be better translated organs).
CS LewisAD 1963
Weight of Glory, Membership
The Christian is called not to individualism but to membership in the mystical body... The very word membership is of Christian origin, but it has been taken over by the world and emptied of all meaning. In any book on logic you may see the expression "members of a class." It must be most emphatically stated that the items or particulars included in a homogeneous class are almost the reverse of what St. Paul meant by members. By members he meant what we should call organs, things essentially different from, and complimentary to, one another, things differing not only in structure and function but also in dignity. Thus, in a club, the committee as a whole and the servants as a whole may both properly be regarded as "members"; what we should call the members of the club are merely units. A row of identically dressed and identically trained soldiers set side by side, or a number of citizens listed as voters in a constituency are not members of anything in the Pauline sense. I am afraid that when we describe a man as "a member of the Church" we usually mean nothing Pauline; we mean only that he is a unit - that he is one more specimen of some kind of things as X and Y and Z. How true membership in a body differs from inclusion in a collective may be seen in the structure of a family. The grandfather, the parents, the grown-up son, the child, the dog, and the cat are true members (in the organic sense), precisely because they are not members or units of a homogenous class. They are not interchangeable. Each person is almost a species in himself. The mother is not simply a different person from the daughter; she is a different kind of person. The grown-up brother is not simply one unit in the class children; he is a separate estate of the realm. The father and grandfather are almost as different as the cat and the dog. If you subtract any one member, you have not simply reduced the family in number; you have inflicted an injury on its structure. Its unity is a unity of unliked, almost of incommensurables...
The society into which the Christian is called at baptism is not a collective but a Body. It is in fact that Body of which the family is an image on the natural level. If anyone came to it with the misconception that membership of the Church was membership in a debased modern sense - a massing together of persons as if they were pennies or counters - he would be corrected at the threshold by the discovery that the head of this Body is so unlike the inferior memberships that they share no predicate with Him save by analogy.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 12:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
First Corinthians 12:19 is a rhetorical question posed by the Apostle Paul, serving as a logical conclusion to his extended analogy of the church as a single, unified body composed of diverse members. Through this verse, Paul underscores the absolute necessity of variety within the Christian community, arguing that if every part were identical, the very concept of a functional, multifaceted body would be rendered meaningless, thereby emphasizing God's intentional design for diversity and interdependence among believers.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: This verse is situated within Paul's comprehensive discourse on spiritual gifts in 1 Corinthians 12. Paul addresses the Corinthian church's issues of disunity, pride, and misunderstanding regarding the distribution and purpose of spiritual gifts. He begins by establishing that all gifts originate from the same Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:4-11), then introduces the profound metaphor of the church as a human body, where Christ is the head and believers are its various members (1 Corinthians 12:12). Verses 1 Corinthians 12:14-19 specifically highlight the absurdity of any single part claiming self-sufficiency or inferiority. Paul uses a series of rhetorical questions, starting with the foot and ear feeling inadequate (1 Corinthians 12:15-16), then progressing to the entire body being only one sense organ (1 Corinthians 12:17), before culminating in the pointed question of verse 19, which effectively dismantles the notion of uniformity.
Historical & Cultural Context: The church in Corinth was a vibrant but problematic community, characterized by internal divisions, moral failings, and theological misunderstandings. Located in a major Roman port city, Corinth was a melting pot of cultures, philosophies, and religious practices, including various mystery cults and pagan worship. This diverse environment likely contributed to the Corinthians' struggles with social hierarchy and spiritual elitism. Some members, perhaps those with more outwardly impressive gifts like speaking in tongues or prophecy, may have looked down upon others, while those with less "flashy" gifts might have felt marginalized. Paul's analogy of the body would have resonated with their understanding of a functional society or household, where different members (slaves, freedmen, citizens) had distinct, yet interdependent, roles. His emphasis on the divine appointment of each member (1 Corinthians 12:18) directly challenged any human-imposed hierarchy or self-exaltation within the church.
Key Themes: 1 Corinthians 12 is rich with foundational themes crucial for understanding Christian community. The central theme is Unity in Diversity, asserting that the church's strength lies not in uniformity but in the harmonious functioning of its varied parts. Paul emphasizes Interdependence, illustrating that no member is self-sufficient and each relies on others for the body's overall health and operation, as seen in his argument that the eye cannot say to the hand, "I have no need of thee" (1 Corinthians 12:21). Another significant theme is the Divine Sovereignty in Gift Distribution, highlighted by the assertion that God "hath set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him" (1 Corinthians 12:18). This theme directly counters human pride or envy by attributing the diversity of gifts to God's deliberate and wise design. Finally, the chapter promotes the Essential Value of Every Member, even those seemingly "less honourable" (1 Corinthians 12:22-25), reinforcing that every part contributes indispensably to the body's well-being.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Paul masterfully employs several literary devices in this concise verse. The primary device is a Rhetorical Question, "where [were] the body?", which is designed not to elicit an answer but to make an emphatic point. By posing a question with an obvious, self-evident answer (there would be no body), Paul powerfully conveys the absurdity of uniformity within the church. This rhetorical strategy engages the reader and compels them to acknowledge the logical necessity of diversity. Furthermore, the entire passage, including this verse, is built upon an extended Analogy or Metaphor of the human body. The physical body, with its various, distinct, yet interdependent members, serves as a vivid representation of the spiritual body of Christ, the church. This metaphor allows Paul to explain complex theological truths about unity, diversity, and interdependence in a relatable and memorable way, making the abstract concept of spiritual gifts concrete and understandable. The verse also contains an element of Reductio ad Absurdum, where Paul takes a flawed premise (the desire for uniformity) to its logical, absurd conclusion, thereby demonstrating its inherent impossibility and folly.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Corinthians 12:19 profoundly articulates God's design for the church as a vibrant, multi-faceted organism, not a monolithic entity. It underscores the theological truth that divine wisdom is manifest in diversity, not uniformity. God, in His sovereign wisdom, has purposefully endowed each believer with unique gifts and placed them strategically within the body, ensuring that every part contributes to the whole. This divine intentionality means that every member is indispensable, and any attempt to homogenize the body or diminish certain roles is a direct affront to God's perfect plan. The verse calls believers to embrace their unique identity and function while simultaneously valuing and celebrating the distinct contributions of others, fostering a spirit of mutual dependence and humility rather than competition or self-sufficiency.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This powerful rhetorical question from Paul serves as a timeless reminder for every believer and every local church. It challenges us to deeply reflect on our own place within the body of Christ, recognizing that our unique gifts, personalities, and experiences are not accidental but divinely appointed for a purpose. We are called to resist the temptation to compare ourselves to others, either by feeling inferior because our gifts are not perceived as prominent, or by feeling superior because we believe our gifts are more valuable. True spiritual maturity involves humbly embracing our own role and actively affirming the vital contributions of every other member, understanding that the church's health and effectiveness are contingent upon the harmonious functioning of all its diverse parts. This verse compels us to cultivate a culture of mutual respect, appreciation, and collaboration, where unity is forged not through sameness, but through the beautiful synergy of distinct members working together under the headship of Christ for the glory of God and the advancement of His kingdom.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does Paul use the analogy of the human body to describe the church?
Answer: Paul uses the analogy of the human body because it is a familiar and highly effective way to illustrate complex concepts of unity, diversity, and interdependence. A physical body is a single entity, yet it is composed of many distinct parts (eyes, hands, feet, ears) that all perform different functions. Crucially, these parts are not independent but are interconnected and rely on each other for the body to function as a whole. If one part suffers, the whole body suffers (1 Corinthians 12:26). This metaphor perfectly conveys that the church, though made up of many individual believers with diverse gifts and roles, is one unified organism, with Christ as its head (Ephesians 4:15-16). It emphasizes that every member is essential and contributes uniquely to the overall health and mission of the church.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Corinthians 12:19 speaks directly to the diversity within the church, its deepest fulfillment is found in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who is the very "head" of this body (Colossians 1:18). The unity in diversity that Paul champions is not merely an organizational principle but a reflection of the triune God, perfectly unified yet distinct in persons, and perfectly embodied in Christ. Jesus, through His incarnate life, sacrificial death, and glorious resurrection, is the one who reconciles diverse individuals to God and to one another, breaking down "the middle wall of partition" (Ephesians 2:14). He is the ultimate "member" who, by being "all in all" (Colossians 3:11), enables the existence and function of the entire body. Without Christ, the body would indeed be nothing; He is the source of its life, its gifts, and its purpose. Every spiritual gift, every unique function within the church, flows from His grace and serves to build up His body until we all attain to "the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ" (Ephesians 4:13). Thus, the rhetorical question "where [were] the body?" finds its profound answer in Christ: the body exists and thrives because He is its unifying, empowering, and sustaining Head.