Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Michael H4317, and Ispah H3472, and Joha H3109, the sons H1121 of Beriah H1283;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Mikha'el, Yishpah and Yocha were the sons of B'ri'ah.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Michael, Ishpah, and Joha were the sons of Beriah.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Michael, and Ishpah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Michael, and Ishpah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Michael, and Ispah, and Ioha, the sonnes of Beriah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Michael, and Ispah, and Joha, sons of Beriah,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,592 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:16 meticulously lists Michael, Ispah, and Joha as the sons of Beriah, precisely detailing a specific family branch within the tribe of Benjamin. This entry is an integral part of the extensive genealogical records that dominate the opening chapters of 1 Chronicles, serving to meticulously trace lineages crucial for establishing tribal identities, confirming land rights, and validating the social and religious order of ancient Israel, particularly for the post-exilic community seeking to reconnect with its heritage and divine promises.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The initial nine chapters of 1 Chronicles are almost exclusively dedicated to genealogies, systematically tracing the lineage from Adam through the various tribes of Israel. This meticulous record-keeping forms the foundational bedrock for the historical narrative that unfolds thereafter, profoundly emphasizing God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people. Chapter 8 specifically hones its focus on the tribe of Benjamin, detailing its intricate family branches and descendants. Verse 16, by explicitly naming "Michael, Ispah, and Joha, the sons of Beriah," seamlessly integrates into this expansive genealogical framework, providing a precise, detailed entry within the Benjaminite lineage that commenced with Benjamin's sons in 1 Chronicles 8:1. These lists are far more than mere dry facts; they serve a vital purpose in connecting the returning exiles to their heritage and to God's ongoing redemptive work through His chosen people, ensuring continuity and identity.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of Chronicles was compiled primarily for the Jewish community that had returned from Babylonian exile. For this post-exilic audience, genealogies held profound and multifaceted significance, addressing practical, social, and spiritual needs. They were absolutely vital for the re-establishment of tribal identities, the validation of claims to ancestral land, and the confirmation of eligibility for priestly and Levitical service within the reconstituted community. In a society where one's lineage fundamentally determined status, inheritance, and religious roles, these meticulous records provided an indispensable sense of continuity and legitimacy after decades of disruptive displacement. The inclusion of specific names like Michael, Ispah, and Joha underscores the ancient scribes' unwavering commitment to preserving the exact details of family lines, thereby ensuring the integrity of the covenant community and its future.

  • Key Themes: The meticulous genealogies, including the specific entry in 1 Chronicles 8:16, underscore several profound key themes. Primarily, they highlight the preservation of lineage, powerfully demonstrating God's faithfulness in maintaining the family lines through which His covenant promises would ultimately be fulfilled, culminating in the Messiah. Secondly, these records provide a deep and abiding sense of identity and heritage for the Israelite community, connecting each individual and family unit to the broader, unfolding narrative of God's chosen people and their divinely appointed place within the land. Finally, the sheer detail of these lists, even for individuals whose stories are not elaborated upon, speaks volumes about God's comprehensive attention to detail. It profoundly suggests that every person, regardless of their historical prominence or lack thereof, is known, seen, and significant in God's sight, reflecting the glorious truth that God knows our frame and all our days are written in His book, as so powerfully expressed in Psalm 139:16.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Michael (Hebrew, Mîykâʼêl', H4317): This common Hebrew name literally means "Who is like God?" It functions as a rhetorical question that inherently serves as a powerful theological declaration, emphasizing God's incomparable nature, supreme power, and unique sovereignty. Its inclusion in a genealogical list, alongside other names, subtly weaves profound theological affirmations into the very fabric of Israelite identity, serving as a constant reminder to individuals and families of God's unparalleled majesty.
  • Ispah (Hebrew, Yishpâh', H3472): Derived from H3472, this name is perhaps from the root meaning "he will scratch." While its precise etymology and meaning may be less certain in scholarly consensus, its presence, along with Joha, underscores the meticulous and comprehensive nature of the genealogical record. Every individual, even those whose names carry no obvious theological or narrative significance, was deemed important enough to be included in the tribal register, highlighting the Chronicler's commitment to thoroughness.
  • Joha (Hebrew, Yôwchâʼ', H3109): Derived from H3109, this name is probably from "Jehovah" and a variation of "to live," suggesting "Jehovah-revived." Regardless of its specific meaning, its inclusion alongside Michael and Ispah reinforces the thoroughness of the chronicler's work in documenting every branch of the Benjaminite lineage. This attention to detail ensured that no family unit was overlooked in the tribal accounting, affirming the importance of each part of the covenant community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Michael, and Ispah, and Joha": This opening phrase introduces three distinct individuals by name, linked by the repeated use of the Hebrew waw conjunction ("and"). This simple enumeration emphasizes the individual identity of each person within the family unit. The very act of naming highlights the chronicler's commitment to precision and the profound importance of individual recognition within the larger tribal structure, ensuring that each member of the lineage is accounted for.
  • "the sons of Beriah": This concluding phrase immediately identifies the paternal lineage of the three named individuals. By stating their father, Beriah, the verse firmly anchors them within a specific sub-clan of the tribe of Benjamin. This hierarchical structure is typical of biblical genealogies, demonstrating how individuals fit into families, families into clans, and clans into tribes, all contributing to the overall order, stability, and identity of the nation of Israel.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 8:16, as in much of the opening chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is a systematic list of ancestors and descendants, meticulously tracing family lines. Its purpose here is not merely historical documentation but also deeply theological and socio-political, serving to establish identity, legitimacy, and continuity for the post-exilic community. Closely related is Enumeration, the simple, repetitive listing of names. This technique emphasizes the thoroughness and precision of the record-keeping, underscoring the chronicler's commitment to detail and highlighting the divine oversight of Israel's history, where every individual, no matter how seemingly minor, has a designated place in God's unfolding plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 8:16 may appear to be a simple list of names, it carries profound theological weight, speaking volumes about God's meticulous care for His people. It powerfully demonstrates that His covenant promises are not abstract concepts but are intimately interwoven with the specific lives and lineages of individuals. The preservation of these family records underscores the unwavering faithfulness of God in maintaining a chosen people through whom His redemptive plan would ultimately unfold. It serves as a poignant reminder that even seemingly insignificant individuals, whose stories are not elaborated upon in the broader narrative, play a vital part in God's grand design, contributing to the rich tapestry of salvation history. This divine attention to detail reflects a God who intimately knows and deeply cares for every person within His covenant community, ensuring the continuity of His promises across countless generations.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane listing of names in 1 Chronicles 8:16 offers surprisingly rich and profound insights for contemporary reflection and application. It encourages us to value our own heritage and family history, recognizing that our roots often profoundly shape our identity and provide a crucial sense of belonging within a larger narrative. More profoundly, it reminds us that every individual, regardless of their prominence in human history or society, is intimately known, seen, and deeply valued by God. Michael, Ispah, and Joha are not merely abstract names; they represent real lives known to God, each a part of His intricate, sovereign plan. This truth should inspire us to recognize that our own lives, even in their "unsung" or seemingly ordinary moments, contribute significantly to God's larger, eternal work. Faithfulness in our specific spheres of influence, whether public or private, is profoundly significant in His eyes, and our seemingly small contributions are meticulously woven into the grand narrative of His kingdom, just as these individuals contributed to the lineage that ultimately led to the Messiah.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the meticulous nature of biblical genealogies impact your view of God's attention to detail in your own life?
  • In what ways does your personal heritage or family history shape your identity, and how can you honor it within a biblical framework that prioritizes God's sovereign plan?
  • What "unsung" contributions are you making in your sphere of influence that, though unseen or uncelebrated by many, are profoundly significant in God's eyes?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so extensive and seemingly repetitive in Chronicles?

Answer: The extensive genealogies in Chronicles, particularly in the first nine chapters, served crucial and multifaceted purposes for the post-exilic community in Judah. After decades of Babylonian captivity, the returning exiles desperately needed to re-establish their identity, confirm their tribal affiliations, and validate their claims to ancestral lands. These records were absolutely vital for maintaining social order, ensuring proper inheritance distribution, and verifying eligibility for sacred offices, such as the priesthood and Levitical service. For example, Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7 provide similar, detailed lists of returnees, powerfully emphasizing the critical importance of lineage for re-establishing the community's structure and function. The Chronicler's detailed genealogies, beginning with Adam in 1 Chronicles 1, meticulously connected the present generation directly to God's covenant history, profoundly reminding them of their rich heritage and God's enduring, unwavering faithfulness to His promises across all generations.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:16 is a seemingly simple genealogical entry, its inclusion within the broader biblical narrative profoundly points to the meticulous, sovereign, and redemptive plan of God that ultimately culminates in Jesus Christ. The careful preservation of lineages, even those of seemingly minor figures like Michael, Ispah, and Joha, underscores God's unwavering commitment to maintaining a chosen people through whom the promised Messiah would ultimately come. These ancient family trees, with their detailed branches and roots, form the essential historical backdrop for the New Testament genealogies of Jesus, found in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38. These New Testament accounts powerfully demonstrate that Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of God's covenant promises, the "Son of David" and "Son of Abraham," whose lineage is meticulously traced back to the very beginning of humanity. Thus, every name in the Old Testament genealogies, including the "sons of Beriah," contributes to the grand, unfolding tapestry of salvation history, showcasing God's precise and unwavering faithfulness in bringing forth the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.