Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Coz begat Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel the son of Harum.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Coz H6976 begat H3205 Anub H6036, and Zobebah H6637, and the families H4940 of Aharhel H316 the son H1121 of Harum H2037.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Kotz fathered 'Anuv, Tzovevah and the families of Acharchel the son of Harum.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and Koz, who was the father of Anub and Zobebah and of the clans of Aharhel son of Harum.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Hakkoz begat Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel the son of Harum.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Hakkoz became the father of Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel the son of Harum.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Also Coz begate Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel the sonne of Harum.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Coz begat Anub, and Zobebah, and the families of Aharhel son of Harum.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,394 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:8, embedded within the extensive genealogies of Judah, meticulously records the lineage of Coz, detailing his descendants Anub, Zobebah, and the families tracing back to Aharhel, son of Harum. This verse, though seemingly a simple list of names, serves as a vital component in the chronicler's overarching purpose: to re-establish the identity, heritage, and continuity of God's people in the post-exilic era, affirming divine faithfulness in preserving the tribal lines, particularly the one from which the promised Messiah would ultimately emerge.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 4:8 is situated within the broader genealogical records of 1 Chronicles 1-9, which systematically trace the lineage of Israel from Adam through the various tribes, culminating in a detailed focus on the tribe of Judah. Specifically, chapter 4 elaborates on the descendants of Judah, following the primary list in 1 Chronicles 2. This section is not merely a dry list but serves to establish tribal identity, land inheritance rights, and the legitimacy of various families within the community. The meticulous detail, even for less prominent figures like Coz and his descendants, underscores the importance of every link in the chain, reinforcing the unbroken continuity of God's covenant people.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled after the Babylonian exile, addressing a community that had returned to Judah and was in the process of rebuilding its national and religious life. For this post-exilic audience, genealogies were paramount. They provided a tangible connection to their past, validating their claims to ancestral lands, confirming their tribal affiliations, and, crucially, establishing the legitimacy of priestly and Levitical lines for temple service. In a society where identity, inheritance, and social standing were intrinsically linked to one's lineage, these records were not just historical documents but foundational blueprints for re-establishing order and continuity. The emphasis on Judah's line was particularly significant, given the ancient promises regarding the Davidic monarchy.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous record-keeping in 1 Chronicles 4:8 and the surrounding chapters contributes to several overarching themes. Firstly, it highlights Divine Faithfulness and Preservation, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people, preserving their lineage even through periods of dispersion and exile. Secondly, it underscores the theme of Identity and Belonging, providing the returned exiles with a profound sense of rootedness and continuity, connecting them to their ancestral heritage and God's historical work. Lastly, implicitly, these genealogies contribute to the theme of Preparation for the Messiah, as the careful tracing of Judah's line lays the groundwork for the eventual fulfillment of God's promise of a king from David's lineage, a theme explicitly picked up in the New Testament genealogies of Jesus Christ found in Matthew 1 and Luke 3.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Coz (Hebrew, Qôwts, H6976): This name, though obscure to modern readers, represents an individual within the extensive Judahite lineage. Its inclusion, along with his descendants, emphasizes the meticulous nature of the chronicler's record. The very act of naming signifies recognition and importance within the larger tribal structure, asserting that every link in the chain was known and valued in the divine and communal memory.
  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad, H3205): This verb is a standard and frequently used term in biblical genealogies, signifying direct paternal descent. Its consistent use throughout these lists underscores the unbroken chain of generations and the precise tracing of lineage, which was crucial for establishing legal and social claims in ancient Israel. It emphasizes the biological and social continuity of the family line.
  • families (Hebrew, mishpâchâh, H4940): This term is significant because it shifts from individual "begat" to a collective "families." It suggests that the subsequent name, Aharhel, was a progenitor of a distinct clan or sub-group within the larger Judahite tribe. This highlights the multi-layered social structure of Israelite society, where individuals belonged to families, which in turn belonged to larger clans, and then to tribes. The chronicler is not just listing individuals but mapping out the intricate network of kinship that formed the backbone of the community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Coz begat Anub, and Zobebah": This clause establishes a direct paternal relationship, identifying Coz as the father of Anub and Zobebah. These names, though not prominent elsewhere in Scripture, were vital markers for the original audience, connecting specific individuals and their descendants to the broader tribal records. It highlights the continuation of the family line through direct offspring.
  • "and the families of Aharhel the son of Harum": This second part of the verse expands the scope beyond direct individual offspring to include "families." This indicates that Aharhel, identified as the son of Harum, was the head or progenitor of a significant family unit or clan. The inclusion of "families" suggests a more extensive group of descendants, emphasizing the collective identity and perpetuation of the lineage through a broader kinship group rather than just individual sons. This detail would have been crucial for understanding land distribution, tribal responsibilities, and social organization.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:8, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy (or Pedigree). This systematic listing of ancestors and descendants serves multiple purposes: it establishes lineage and legitimacy, confirms tribal identity, and provides historical continuity for the community. The meticulous nature of the record, including seemingly obscure names, demonstrates a commitment to comprehensive historical preservation. Another subtle device is Nominalism, where the very act of naming and listing individuals, even those without accompanying narratives, imbues them with significance and acknowledges their place within the divine plan and the collective memory of Israel. The repetition inherent in genealogical lists, though not fully evident in a single verse, also serves to emphasize the unbroken chain of generations and God's faithfulness in preserving His people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 4:8, as part of the extensive genealogies, underscores a profound theological truth: God's meticulous attention to detail and His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. Even in the seemingly mundane listing of names, we see the divine hand at work, preserving the lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold. These records were not merely historical archives but living testimonies to God's sovereignty over history, ensuring the continuity of His people and the eventual arrival of the promised Messiah. They affirm that every individual, no matter how obscure to human eyes, holds a place in God's grand narrative, contributing to the tapestry of His unfolding purposes.

  • Genesis 10:32: This verse concludes the "Table of Nations," demonstrating God's broad interest in the origins and dispersion of all humanity, setting the stage for the focused lineage of Abraham.
  • Ruth 4:18-22: This short genealogy explicitly traces the line from Perez (son of Judah) to David, illustrating how seemingly minor individuals contribute to the crucial lineage of the Davidic covenant.
  • Ezra 2:59-63: This passage highlights the practical importance of genealogies for the post-exilic community, particularly for those claiming priestly roles, demonstrating how crucial these records were for establishing identity and legitimate service.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names like 1 Chronicles 4:8 might initially strike a modern reader as tedious, for the original audience, it was foundational—a tangible link to their past, a confirmation of their identity, and a validation of their inheritance rights. For us today, this verse, embedded within the larger biblical narrative, serves as a powerful reminder that God is intimately interested in the details of every life. No person is insignificant in His eyes, and every individual, no matter how seemingly small their contribution, plays a part in His unfolding story. It encourages us to find our own place within the vast, interconnected family of God, recognizing that our lives, our heritage, and our contributions are known and valued by Him, contributing to the larger tapestry of His redemptive work in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the purpose of biblical genealogies change your perspective on seemingly "dry" parts of Scripture?
  • In what ways does God's meticulous record-keeping of ancient families encourage you about His attention to the details of your own life and lineage?
  • How can we, like the original audience, find our identity and sense of belonging within God's larger story, even when our personal histories seem insignificant?

FAQ

Why are these genealogies so extensive and detailed in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: The extensive and detailed genealogies in 1 Chronicles served several critical purposes for the post-exilic community returning to Judah. They were essential for re-establishing tribal identity and boundaries, confirming land ownership and inheritance rights, and, most importantly, validating the legitimacy of those claiming priestly and Levitical roles for temple service. By meticulously tracing these lines, the chronicler affirmed God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people and the Davidic line, providing a sense of continuity and hope for a community rebuilding its national and religious life.

Do these genealogies have any relevance for Christians today?

Answer: Absolutely. While not directly applicable to our personal lineage in the same way, these genealogies underscore profound theological truths relevant for Christians. They demonstrate God's sovereignty over history, His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, and His meticulous care in orchestrating events and preserving lines of descent to bring about His redemptive plan. Crucially, they provide the historical framework for the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, whose own genealogies are recorded in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They remind us that every life, no matter how seemingly minor, is part of God's grand narrative, culminating in the person and work of Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The seemingly mundane names in 1 Chronicles 4:8, like Coz, Anub, Zobebah, Aharhel, and Harum, are more than just historical records; they are vital threads in the intricate tapestry of God's redemptive plan, ultimately finding their Christ-centered fulfillment. The meticulous preservation of the Judahite lineage, even through obscure individuals, underscores God's providential hand guiding history to ensure the promised seed would come. This unbroken chain of generations, carefully documented by the chronicler, culminates in Jesus, the Son of David, who is the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic covenant and the hope of Israel. Every name, every "begat," points to the faithfulness of God in bringing forth the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world. In Christ, the focus shifts from physical lineage to spiritual adoption, as all who believe are now children of God by faith in Christ Jesus, becoming part of God's eternal family, the church, which is the body of Christ (e.g., Ephesians 1:22-23). Thus, the ancient genealogies, far from being irrelevant, serve as a testament to the divine faithfulness that meticulously prepared the way for the Savior of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 1–10

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

One reason, no doubt, why Ezra is here most particular in the register of the tribe of Judah is because it was that tribe which, with its appendages, Simeon, Benjamin, and Levi, made up the kingdom of Judah, which not only long survived the other tribes in Canaan, but in process of time, now when this was written, returned out of captivity, when the generality of the other tribes were lost in the kingdom of Assyria. The most remarkable person in this paragraph is Jabez. It is not said whose son he was, nor does it appear in what age he lived; but, it should seem, he was the founder of one of the families of Aharhel, mentioned Ch1 4:8. Here is,

I. The reason of his name: his mother gave him the name with this reason, Because I bore him with sorrow, Ch1 4:9. All children are borne with sorrow (for the sentence upon the woman is, In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children), but some with much more sorrow than others. Usually the sorrow in bearing is afterwards forgotten for joy that the child is born; but here it seems it was so extraordinary that it was remembered when the child came to be circumcised, and care was taken to perpetuate the remembrance of it while he lived. Perhaps the mother called Habez, as Rachel called her son Benoni, when she was dying of the sorrow. Or, if she recovered it, yet thus she recorded it, 1. That it might be a continual memorandum to herself, to be thankful to God as long as she lived for supporting her under and bringing her through that sorrow. It may be of use to be often reminded of our sorrows, that we may always have such thoughts of things as we had in the day of our affliction, and may learn to rejoice with trembling. 2. That it might likewise be a memorandum to him what this world is into which she bore him, a vale of tears, in which he must expect few days and full of trouble. The sorrow he carried in his name might help to put a seriousness upon his spirit. It might also remind him to love and honour his mother, and labour, in every thing, to be a comfort to her who brought him into the world with so much sorrow. It is piety in children thus to requite their parents, Ti1 5:4.

II. The eminence of his character: He was more honourable than his brethren, qualified above them by the divine grace and dignified above them by the divine providence; they did virtuously, but he excelled them all. Now the sorrow with which his mother bore him was abundantly recompensed. That son which of all her children cost her most dear she was most happy in, and was made glad in proportion to the affliction, Psa 90:15. We are not told upon what account he was more honourable than his brethren, whether because he raised a greater estate, or was preferred to the magistracy, or signalized himself in war; we have most reason to think it was upon the account of his learning and piety, not only because these, above any thing, put honour upon a man, but because we have reason to think that in these Jabez was eminent. 1. In learning, because we find that the families of the scribes dwelt at Jabez (Ch1 2:55), a city which, it is likely, took its name from him. The Jews say that he was a famous doctor of the law and left many disciples behind him. And it should seem, by the mentioning of him so abruptly here, that his name was well known when Ezra wrote this. 2. In piety, because we find here that he was a praying man. His inclination to devotion made him truly honourable, and by prayer he obtained those blessings from God which added much to his honour. The way to be truly great is to be truly good and to pray much.

III. The prayer he made, probably like Solomon's prayer for wisdom, just when he was setting out in the world. He set himself to acknowledge God in all his ways, put himself under the divine blessing and protection, and prospered accordingly. Perhaps these were the heads on which he enlarged in his daily prayers; for this purpose it was his constant practice to pray alone, and with his family, as Daniel. Some think that it was upon some particular occasion, when he was straitened and threatened by his enemies, that he prayed this prayer. Observe,

1.To whom he prayed, not to any of the gods of the Gentiles; no, he called on the God of Israel, the living and true God, who alone can hear and answer prayer, and in prayer had an eye to him as the God of Israel, a God in covenant with his people, the God with whom Jacob wrestled and prevailed and was thence called Israel.

2.What was the nature of his prayer. (1.) As the margin reads it, it was a solemn vow - If thou wilt bless me indeed, etc. and then the sense is imperfect, but may easily be filled up from Jacob's vow, or some such like - then thou shalt be my God. He did not express his promise, but left it to be understood, either because he was afraid to promise in his own strength or because he resolved to devote himself entirely to God. He does, as it were, give God a blank paper, let him write what he pleases: "Lord, if thou wilt bless me and keep me, do what thou wilt with me, I will be at thy command and disposal for ever." (2.) As the text reads it, it was the language of a most ardent and affectionate desire: O that thou wouldst bless me!

3.What was the matter of his prayer. Four things he prayed for: - (1.) That God would bless him indeed: "That, blessing, thou wilt bless me, bless me greatly with manifold and abundant blessings." Perhaps he had an eye to the promise God made to Abraham (Gen 22:17), In blessing, I will bless thee. "Let that blessing of Abraham come upon me." Spiritual blessings are the best blessings, and those are blessed indeed who are blessed with them. God's blessings are real things and produce real effects. We can but wish a blessing: he commands it. Those whom he blesses are blessed indeed. (2.) That he would enlarge his coast, that he would prosper his endeavours for the increase of what fell to his lot either by work or war. That God would enlarge our hearts, and so enlarge our portion in himself and in the heavenly Canaan, ought to be our desire and prayer. (3.) That God's hand might be with him. The prayer of Moses for this tribe of Judah was, That his own hands might be sufficient for him, Deu 33:7; but Jabez expects not that this can be the case, unless he have God's hand with him and the presence of his power. God's hand with us, to lead us, protect us, strengthen us, and to work all our works in us and for us, is indeed a hand sufficient for us, all-sufficient. (4.) That he would keep him from evil, the evil of sin, the evil of trouble, all the evil designs of his enemies, that they might not hurt him, nor grieve him, nor make him a Jabez indeed, a man of sorrow: in the original there is an allusion to his name. Father in heaven, deliver me from evil.

4.What was the success of his prayer: God granted him that which he requested, prospered him remarkably, and gave him success in his undertakings, in his studies, in his worldly business, in his conflicts with the Canaanites, and so he became more honourable than his brethren. God was of old always ready to hear prayer, and his ear is not yet heavy.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.