Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Helah were, Zereth, and Jezoar, and Ethnan.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Helah H2458 were, Zereth H6889, and Jezoar H6714 H3328, and Ethnan H869.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Hel'ah were Tzeret, Tzochar and Etnan.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Helah were Zereth, Zohar, Ethnan,
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Helah were Zereth, Izhar, and Ethnan.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Helah were Zereth, Izhar, and Ethnan.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Heleah were Zereth, Iezohar and Ethnan.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Helah: Zereth, and Zohar, and Ethnan.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,393 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:7 is a succinct genealogical entry within the extensive records of the tribe of Judah, meticulously detailing the immediate offspring of Helah. This verse precisely lists Zereth, Jezoar, and Ethnan as her sons, contributing to the Chronicler's overarching purpose of preserving the tribal identities, land inheritances, and, critically, the unbroken lineage that would ultimately lead to the Davidic monarchy and the promised Messiah. Its inclusion, though brief, underscores the divine attention to detail in the historical unfolding of God's redemptive plan and the profound significance of every individual within His sovereign purposes.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within 1 Chronicles chapter 4, which is exclusively dedicated to the intricate genealogies of the tribe of Judah, following the broader, foundational genealogical survey that commences the book in 1 Chronicles 1. The immediate preceding verses (1 Chronicles 4:1-6) meticulously detail other descendants of Judah, specifically through his son Perez and then through Caleb, son of Hezron. Verse 7 then introduces a distinct branch of this sprawling lineage, focusing on the sons born to Helah. The chapter continues by enumerating various families, their settlements, and their occupations within Judah's tribal territory, consistently emphasizing the tribe's preeminence and its pivotal role in Israel's history. The relentless and often terse listing of names, even those without accompanying narratives, serves to establish a comprehensive and unbroken chain of descent, which was profoundly vital for the post-exilic community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely compiled during the post-exilic period, possibly under the guidance of Ezra, for a community that had returned to Jerusalem and was actively seeking to re-establish their identity, heritage, and covenant relationship with God. In ancient Israelite society, genealogies were far more than mere historical chronicles; they functioned as foundational legal and social documents. They affirmed tribal affiliation, established legitimate claims to land inheritance, validated priestly and Levitical claims, and, most significantly, preserved the sacred lineage of the Davidic monarchy. The meticulous detail, extending even to seemingly minor figures like Helah and her sons, profoundly reflects the cultural paramount importance of family and lineage in defining one's place within the covenant community. These records were indispensable for the returning exiles to understand their past, affirm their present claims, and anticipate the future fulfillment of God's promises, particularly concerning the Davidic king and the restoration of Israel.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:7 contributes significantly to several profound themes pervasive throughout 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it underscores the paramount importance of genealogy as both a divine and human endeavor, demonstrating God's meticulous care in preserving the lineage of His chosen people and the specific line of the Davidic covenant. This meticulous record-keeping powerfully highlights God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises across countless generations, even through periods of national upheaval, exile, and dispersion. Secondly, within the broader context of Judah's extensive genealogy, this verse subtly yet firmly reinforces the centrality and preeminence of the tribe of Judah as the royal tribe, from which the promised king would ultimately emerge. Every single name listed, no matter how briefly mentioned, is an indispensable thread in the grand tapestry of God's unfolding redemptive plan, ultimately pointing towards the Messiah's advent and the establishment of His eternal kingdom. The very act of recording these names, even without accompanying narratives, signifies that every individual life is known, valued, and purposed by God within His sovereign and intricate plan for salvation history.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): Derived from the root H1121, bên (singular "son") is a fundamental term in biblical genealogies. While the verse uses the plural form ("sons" or bānîm), the root bên signifies a male offspring, crucial for tracing lineage, inheritance, and tribal identity. In this context, it explicitly links Zereth, Jezoar, and Ethnan to Helah, establishing their direct familial relationship and their place within the broader family tree of Judah. The emphasis on "sons" highlights the patriarchal structure of ancient Israelite society and the critical importance of male lines for the continuity and perpetuation of the family name and tribal structure.
  • Helah (Hebrew, Chelʼâh, H2458): This is a proper noun, identifying an individual woman within the Judahite lineage. While the name itself may not carry a widely recognized meaning or significant theological implication in this specific context, its inclusion is paramount for the integrity of the genealogical record. Helah serves as a vital nodal point, connecting her descendants to the larger tribal structure and ensuring the unbroken chain of the family tree. The Chronicler's primary purpose here is not to elaborate on Helah's life or deeds, but to precisely document her contribution to the lineage, underscoring the importance of every link in the chain.
  • Jezoar (Hebrew, Yitschar, H3328): As one of Helah's sons, "Jezoar" (transliterated from H3328 as Yitschar) is a proper noun, meaning "he will shine." Like the other names in this verse, its primary function is genealogical. While the meaning "he will shine" might subtly hint at a future hope or a characteristic, in the context of a dry list, its significance is primarily its role in maintaining the accuracy and completeness of the tribal record. Its inclusion, alongside Zereth and Ethnan, reinforces the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail in tracing the lineage of Judah, ensuring every branch of the family tree is accounted for.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Helah [were]": This opening clause serves as the formal introduction to a new branch within the extensive genealogical record of Judah. The conjunction "And" (וְ, ) seamlessly connects this entry to the preceding lists, indicating a continuation of the lineage of Judah. The phrase "the sons of Helah" clearly identifies the parent and signals that the subsequent names are her direct male descendants, thereby establishing their precise familial relationship within the tribe. The verb "were" is supplied in English translations for grammatical clarity, as the Hebrew often uses a simple juxtaposition for such enumerative lists.
  • "Zereth": The first son of Helah explicitly mentioned. His name, like those that follow, is presented without any further elaboration or narrative detail, emphasizing the Chronicler's singular focus on enumeration rather than biographical storytelling. His inclusion is solely for the purpose of maintaining the integrity, accuracy, and completeness of the genealogical record, ensuring every link in the chain is documented.
  • "and Jezoar": The second son listed, connected by the simple conjunction "and." This continues the established pattern of straightforward enumeration, adding another individual to Helah's direct offspring. The inclusion of each name, even without accompanying deeds, reinforces the meticulous nature of the record-keeping and the importance of every individual within the divine plan.
  • "and Ethnan": The third and final son of Helah listed in this concise verse. His mention completes the immediate family unit being documented, concluding this specific branch of the Judahite genealogy before the text transitions to other descendants within the broader tribal records. Each name, though brief, contributes to the grand tapestry of God's sovereign preservation of His people's lineage.

Literary Devices

1 Chronicles 4:7, consistent with much of the opening chapters of the book, primarily employs Enumeration, a straightforward listing of names, to fulfill its overarching genealogical purpose. This device is clearly evident in the simple "A, and B, and C" structure of the verse, which efficiently conveys the familial relationships without any narrative embellishment or descriptive prose. The entire section functions as a Genealogy, which is a distinct literary genre in itself, meticulously serving to establish lineage, affirm identity, and ensure historical continuity. The Repetition of the conjunction "and" (וְ, ) before each subsequent name ("and Jezoar, and Ethnan") is a common and characteristic Hebrew stylistic feature in lists, creating a rhythmic flow and emphasizing the additive nature of the enumeration. While seemingly dry or mundane to a modern reader, these literary devices are absolutely crucial for the Chronicler's aim of meticulously preserving the sacred history and the divinely ordained lines of descent that were foundational to Israel's identity and future hope.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 4:7 might appear to be a mere list of names, its profound theological significance lies in its contribution to the overarching narrative of God's unwavering faithfulness and the meticulous preservation of the covenant line. The very act of recording these seemingly obscure names underscores a profound biblical truth: every individual, regardless of their historical prominence or recorded deeds, is known to God and plays a part, however small, in His grand redemptive plan. This verse, therefore, stands as a quiet but powerful testament to God's sovereign hand guiding history, ensuring the continuity of the lineage through which His promises would ultimately be fulfilled. It serves as a poignant reminder that God's purposes are vast, extending across countless generations, meticulously woven into the very fabric of human history.

  • Genesis 5:1-32 - An extensive and foundational genealogy from Adam to Noah, demonstrating God's preservation of humanity and a righteous line through the early patriarchs.
  • Ruth 4:18-22 - A specific and crucial genealogy tracing the lineage from Perez (Judah's son) to King David, highlighting the importance of individual names in the Messianic line.
  • Nehemiah 7:5-64 - Illustrates the practical and spiritual importance of genealogical records for the post-exilic community in re-establishing their identity, land claims, and place in the restored covenant community of Israel.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:7, a verse that simply lists three names without accompanying narrative, serves as a powerful and profound reminder of God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign involvement in every aspect of human history, even in what might seem utterly insignificant to our contemporary perspectives. It challenges us to deeply consider that if God cares enough to record the names of individuals who performed no great deeds or left no grand legacy, how infinitely more does He know, value, and purpose each one of us in our own lives? This verse profoundly encourages us to see our own lives, our families, and our heritage as integral threads in a larger, magnificent divine tapestry, recognizing that God works through generations, through the seemingly mundane and the extraordinary, to accomplish His eternal purposes. It fosters a deep sense of belonging within God's vast and eternal family and instills unwavering confidence in His enduring faithfulness, knowing that His plans, though they may span millennia and involve countless individuals, are always precisely and perfectly executed. Our lives, no matter how ordinary or unrecorded they may seem in human history, are intimately known, immeasurably valued, and purposefully designed by the Creator of the universe.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 4:7, challenge our modern understanding of "significance" or "importance" in God's eyes?
  • In what specific ways does this verse encourage us to appreciate our own family heritage and the generations that came before us, seeing them as part of God's unfolding story?
  • What does God's careful preservation of these names, even without detailed narratives, teach us about His intimate knowledge and profound care for every individual human life?
  • How can recognizing our unique place within God's ongoing redemptive story, as illuminated by such genealogies, impact our sense of purpose, identity, and belonging today?

FAQ

Why are such seemingly insignificant names included in the biblical record, especially when no stories or deeds are associated with them?

Answer: The inclusion of names like Zereth, Jezoar, and Ethnan, even without accompanying narratives, serves several crucial purposes within the biblical record, particularly for the Chronicler. Firstly, these genealogies were absolutely vital for the post-exilic community to re-establish their tribal identities, legitimate land rights, and priestly eligibility after returning from their Babylonian captivity. They provided a verifiable and authoritative link to their ancestral heritage and the covenant promises made to their forefathers. Secondly, from a profound theological perspective, these meticulous lists powerfully demonstrate God's meticulous care and unwavering faithfulness in preserving the lineage of His covenant people. Every name, no matter how briefly mentioned, is an indispensable thread in the grand tapestry of God's redemptive plan, ensuring the unbroken chain leading directly to the promised Messiah. This underscores that God's work is not solely through prominent figures but through the continuity of generations, affirming that every individual life is known, valued, and purposed by Him, even if their specific deeds are not recorded. This attention to detail highlights God's sovereign control over history, ensuring His promises are fulfilled precisely as intended, as seen in the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic line in Jesus Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:7 is a seemingly obscure genealogical entry, its profound Christ-centered fulfillment lies in its indispensable contribution to the unbroken lineage that ultimately culminates in the person of Jesus Christ. The meticulous recording of names within the tribe of Judah, even those without accompanying narratives, powerfully underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly the sacred promise of a King from David's line who would reign forever (as majestically prophesied in 2 Samuel 7:12-16). Every name, including Zereth, Jezoar, and Ethnan, serves as a vital, divinely ordained link in this sacred chain, demonstrating God's sovereign hand meticulously guiding history through countless generations to ensure the precise arrival of His Son. The very existence of such detailed genealogies in the Old Testament provides the essential historical, legal, and theological framework for the New Testament's foundational claims about Jesus's identity as the promised Messiah, the true Son of David, and the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Thus, even in these brief, seemingly dry mentions, we discern the meticulous precision of God's eternal plan unfolding, culminating in the incarnation of Christ, through whom all of God's magnificent promises find their resounding "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 1–10

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

One reason, no doubt, why Ezra is here most particular in the register of the tribe of Judah is because it was that tribe which, with its appendages, Simeon, Benjamin, and Levi, made up the kingdom of Judah, which not only long survived the other tribes in Canaan, but in process of time, now when this was written, returned out of captivity, when the generality of the other tribes were lost in the kingdom of Assyria. The most remarkable person in this paragraph is Jabez. It is not said whose son he was, nor does it appear in what age he lived; but, it should seem, he was the founder of one of the families of Aharhel, mentioned Ch1 4:8. Here is,

I. The reason of his name: his mother gave him the name with this reason, Because I bore him with sorrow, Ch1 4:9. All children are borne with sorrow (for the sentence upon the woman is, In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children), but some with much more sorrow than others. Usually the sorrow in bearing is afterwards forgotten for joy that the child is born; but here it seems it was so extraordinary that it was remembered when the child came to be circumcised, and care was taken to perpetuate the remembrance of it while he lived. Perhaps the mother called Habez, as Rachel called her son Benoni, when she was dying of the sorrow. Or, if she recovered it, yet thus she recorded it, 1. That it might be a continual memorandum to herself, to be thankful to God as long as she lived for supporting her under and bringing her through that sorrow. It may be of use to be often reminded of our sorrows, that we may always have such thoughts of things as we had in the day of our affliction, and may learn to rejoice with trembling. 2. That it might likewise be a memorandum to him what this world is into which she bore him, a vale of tears, in which he must expect few days and full of trouble. The sorrow he carried in his name might help to put a seriousness upon his spirit. It might also remind him to love and honour his mother, and labour, in every thing, to be a comfort to her who brought him into the world with so much sorrow. It is piety in children thus to requite their parents, Ti1 5:4.

II. The eminence of his character: He was more honourable than his brethren, qualified above them by the divine grace and dignified above them by the divine providence; they did virtuously, but he excelled them all. Now the sorrow with which his mother bore him was abundantly recompensed. That son which of all her children cost her most dear she was most happy in, and was made glad in proportion to the affliction, Psa 90:15. We are not told upon what account he was more honourable than his brethren, whether because he raised a greater estate, or was preferred to the magistracy, or signalized himself in war; we have most reason to think it was upon the account of his learning and piety, not only because these, above any thing, put honour upon a man, but because we have reason to think that in these Jabez was eminent. 1. In learning, because we find that the families of the scribes dwelt at Jabez (Ch1 2:55), a city which, it is likely, took its name from him. The Jews say that he was a famous doctor of the law and left many disciples behind him. And it should seem, by the mentioning of him so abruptly here, that his name was well known when Ezra wrote this. 2. In piety, because we find here that he was a praying man. His inclination to devotion made him truly honourable, and by prayer he obtained those blessings from God which added much to his honour. The way to be truly great is to be truly good and to pray much.

III. The prayer he made, probably like Solomon's prayer for wisdom, just when he was setting out in the world. He set himself to acknowledge God in all his ways, put himself under the divine blessing and protection, and prospered accordingly. Perhaps these were the heads on which he enlarged in his daily prayers; for this purpose it was his constant practice to pray alone, and with his family, as Daniel. Some think that it was upon some particular occasion, when he was straitened and threatened by his enemies, that he prayed this prayer. Observe,

1.To whom he prayed, not to any of the gods of the Gentiles; no, he called on the God of Israel, the living and true God, who alone can hear and answer prayer, and in prayer had an eye to him as the God of Israel, a God in covenant with his people, the God with whom Jacob wrestled and prevailed and was thence called Israel.

2.What was the nature of his prayer. (1.) As the margin reads it, it was a solemn vow - If thou wilt bless me indeed, etc. and then the sense is imperfect, but may easily be filled up from Jacob's vow, or some such like - then thou shalt be my God. He did not express his promise, but left it to be understood, either because he was afraid to promise in his own strength or because he resolved to devote himself entirely to God. He does, as it were, give God a blank paper, let him write what he pleases: "Lord, if thou wilt bless me and keep me, do what thou wilt with me, I will be at thy command and disposal for ever." (2.) As the text reads it, it was the language of a most ardent and affectionate desire: O that thou wouldst bless me!

3.What was the matter of his prayer. Four things he prayed for: - (1.) That God would bless him indeed: "That, blessing, thou wilt bless me, bless me greatly with manifold and abundant blessings." Perhaps he had an eye to the promise God made to Abraham (Gen 22:17), In blessing, I will bless thee. "Let that blessing of Abraham come upon me." Spiritual blessings are the best blessings, and those are blessed indeed who are blessed with them. God's blessings are real things and produce real effects. We can but wish a blessing: he commands it. Those whom he blesses are blessed indeed. (2.) That he would enlarge his coast, that he would prosper his endeavours for the increase of what fell to his lot either by work or war. That God would enlarge our hearts, and so enlarge our portion in himself and in the heavenly Canaan, ought to be our desire and prayer. (3.) That God's hand might be with him. The prayer of Moses for this tribe of Judah was, That his own hands might be sufficient for him, Deu 33:7; but Jabez expects not that this can be the case, unless he have God's hand with him and the presence of his power. God's hand with us, to lead us, protect us, strengthen us, and to work all our works in us and for us, is indeed a hand sufficient for us, all-sufficient. (4.) That he would keep him from evil, the evil of sin, the evil of trouble, all the evil designs of his enemies, that they might not hurt him, nor grieve him, nor make him a Jabez indeed, a man of sorrow: in the original there is an allusion to his name. Father in heaven, deliver me from evil.

4.What was the success of his prayer: God granted him that which he requested, prospered him remarkably, and gave him success in his undertakings, in his studies, in his worldly business, in his conflicts with the Canaanites, and so he became more honourable than his brethren. God was of old always ready to hear prayer, and his ear is not yet heavy.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.