Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which was the father of Eshton.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Chelub H3620 the brother H251 of Shuah H7746 begat H3205 Mehir H4243, which was the father H1 of Eshton H850.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
K'luv the brother of Shuchah fathered M'chir, who fathered Eshton.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Chelub the brother of Shuhah was the father of Mehir, who was the father of Eshton.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Chelub the brother of Shuhah begat Mehir, who was the father of Eshton.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Chelub the brother of Shuhah became the father of Mehir, who was the father of Eshton.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Chelub the brother of Shuah begate Mehir, which was the father of Eshton.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Chelub brother of Shuah begat Mehir; he is father of Eshton.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,397 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:11 presents a concise yet profoundly significant genealogical entry within the extensive records of the tribe of Judah: "And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which [was] the father of Eshton." This seemingly simple statement serves as a meticulous divine record, underscoring the Chronicler's commitment to preserving the tribal identities and historical continuity of Israel, particularly the royal line from which the Messiah would ultimately descend. It subtly highlights God's sovereign oversight, even in the minute details of human history and family progression, ensuring the fulfillment of His redemptive purposes across generations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is intricately woven into 1 Chronicles 4:1-23, a dedicated segment detailing the genealogies of the tribe of Judah. Following the broader introductory genealogies of chapters 1-3, which trace humanity from Adam and establish the twelve tribes, chapter 4 narrows its focus specifically to Judah, the preeminent tribe from which Israel's kings and, ultimately, the Messiah would emerge. The Chronicler's meticulous record-keeping here emphasizes the paramount importance of tribal identity, land inheritance, and the preservation of the royal line. The inclusion of figures like Chelub, Mehir, and Eshton, though without accompanying narratives, demonstrates the comprehensive nature of these records, ensuring that no part of the divinely ordained lineage is overlooked in the grand tapestry of God's covenant history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled during the post-exilic period, possibly in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE. For the Jewish community returning from Babylonian exile, these genealogies were far more than mere historical curiosities; they were vital legal and communal documents. They served to re-establish identity, confirm tribal affiliations, assert legitimate claims to ancestral land, and organize the priesthood and temple service. The intense focus on Judah was critical, as it was the tribe from which King David originated and through which the enduring promise of a perpetual kingdom and a messianic ruler was given by God (see 2 Samuel 7:12-16). The detailed record of names, even those without extensive narratives, validated their heritage and reinforced their connection to God's historical faithfulness and covenant promises.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:11, like other genealogical entries, contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the Chronicler's work. Firstly, it underscores Divine Meticulousness, revealing God's sovereign hand in preserving the lineage of His people and His precise attention to every individual, regardless of their prominence in the broader narrative. Secondly, it highlights the Preservation of Lineage, which was crucial for maintaining tribal identity, ensuring land rights, and, most importantly, guaranteeing the continuity of God's covenant promises, especially those related to the royal line of Judah (Genesis 49:10). Finally, it speaks powerfully to God's Faithfulness across generations, demonstrating His unwavering commitment to His people and His redemptive plan, even through periods of national upheaval like the exile and subsequent restoration, as seen in the emphasis on genealogies in post-exilic books like Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Chelub (Hebrew, kᵉlûwb', H3620): This name identifies a specific individual within the Judahite lineage. According to the provided ground truth, it is simply the proper name "Kelub," appearing as "Chelub" in English translations, and is the name of two Israelites. Its primary significance here is its role in establishing a precise link in the genealogical chain, rather than any symbolic meaning of the name itself.
  • Mehir (Hebrew, Mᵉchîyr', H4243): The name "Mehir" translates to "price" or "reward." While the name itself carries this meaning, in the context of this genealogical entry, its function is purely identificatory. The Chronicler's focus is on the individual's place within the lineage, connecting him as the son of Chelub and the father of Eshton, rather than on any symbolic interpretation of his name.
  • Eshton (Hebrew, ʼEshtôwn', H850): This name is defined as "restful." As with Chelub and Mehir, the theological or narrative significance of Eshton's name is not explored by the Chronicler in this context. Its crucial role is to complete the specific paternal line being recorded, linking Mehir to his son Eshton within the broader, meticulously detailed family tree of Judah.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir": This clause precisely identifies Chelub as the father of Mehir. The phrase "the brother of Shuah" serves as a crucial identifier, distinguishing this particular Chelub from any other individuals who might share the same name, thereby ensuring accuracy within the complex network of Judahite families. The verb "begat" (וַיּוֹלֶד, vayyoled) is the standard Hebrew term used throughout biblical genealogies to denote direct paternal descent, emphasizing the unbroken transmission of lineage.
  • "which [was] the father of Eshton": This subsequent clause continues the lineage, specifying that Mehir, the son of Chelub, in turn became the father of Eshton. This structure is typical of biblical genealogies, which primarily focus on paternal lines to establish tribal and family continuity. The chain of "begat" statements forms the backbone of these records, demonstrating the unbroken succession of generations and the meticulous nature of the Chronicler's account.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:11, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form designed to establish identity, heritage, and continuity for the post-exilic community. The Chronicler employs remarkable Precision in detailing specific relationships ("the brother of Shuah," "the father of Eshton") to avoid ambiguity and ensure accurate record-keeping of the tribal lines. The Repetition of the "begat" formula is characteristic of genealogical lists, creating a rhythmic and authoritative tone that emphasizes the unbroken chain of descent and the divine orchestration of history. While seemingly dry to a modern reader, for the original audience, this meticulous record served as a powerful affirmation of their historical roots, their place within God's ongoing covenant narrative, and the legitimacy of their claims to land and identity.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly obscure verse, like all genealogical entries in Scripture, serves a profound theological purpose. It stands as a testament to God's meticulous care for His people and His sovereign oversight of history. Every individual, even those briefly mentioned in a lineage, plays a part in the grand tapestry of God's redemptive plan. The preservation of these lineages was not arbitrary; it was essential for maintaining the integrity of tribal identities, land inheritances, and, most critically, the unbroken chain leading to the promised Messiah. It underscores that God works through generations, fulfilling His promises through the faithful, albeit sometimes unseen, progression of families and individuals. The Chronicler's emphasis on Judah's lineage, even down to figures like Chelub, Mehir, and Eshton, implicitly points to the ultimate fulfillment of God's covenant with David and the coming of the King from this very tribe.

  • Genesis 5:1-32 - An early example of detailed genealogies highlighting the continuity of humanity and God's interaction with specific lines, demonstrating His long-term plan.
  • Matthew 1:1-17 - A New Testament genealogy that traces the lineage of Jesus through the tribe of Judah, demonstrating the fulfillment of Old Testament promises and divine faithfulness.
  • Luke 3:23-38 - Another New Testament genealogy, providing a more expansive lineage of Jesus, further affirming the importance of historical continuity and God's sovereign hand in history.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 4:11, though a simple record of lineage, invites us to reflect on the profound truth that every life, no matter how seemingly insignificant in the grand scheme, is known, valued, and purposed by God. Just as He meticulously recorded these ancient family lines, He knows every detail of our lives—our heritage, our present circumstances, and our future. This verse reminds us that we are part of a larger story, a grand narrative of God's faithfulness unfolding across generations. It encourages us to appreciate our own place in God's family, whether by physical lineage or, more importantly, by spiritual adoption through Christ. Our individual lives, with all their unique details, contribute to God's ongoing work in the world, and He uses ordinary people in extraordinary ways to accomplish His divine purposes. We are called to live faithfully, knowing that our lives, like those of Chelub, Mehir, and Eshton, are intricately woven into God's eternal and redemptive plan, each thread contributing to His perfect design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of biblical genealogies, even in seemingly minor verses like this, speak to God's character and His attention to detail in His creation and plan?
  • In what ways does understanding our own heritage, both physical and spiritual, help us to better understand our identity and purpose within God's unfolding story?
  • How can we find significance and purpose in our own lives, even when we feel like minor figures, knowing that God values every individual in His grand design and uses them for His glory?

FAQ

Why are these extensive genealogies included in the Bible, especially in a book like 1 Chronicles, and what is their relevance today?

Answer: The genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including 1 Chronicles 4:11, serve several critical purposes for the post-exilic community to whom the Chronicler was writing. These records were essential for re-establishing their identity as God's covenant people, confirming tribal affiliations, asserting legitimate land claims, and ensuring proper priestly and Levitical service for the re-established temple. They provided a tangible link to their past, validating their place within God's ongoing covenant. The genealogies also underscore God's faithfulness in preserving the lineage of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and especially Judah, from whom the Davidic kings and ultimately the Messiah would come (see Genesis 12:1-3 and 2 Samuel 7:12-16). For us today, they demonstrate God's meticulous oversight of history, ensuring His promises would be fulfilled through specific individuals and families, reinforcing His sovereign control and the reliability of His Word.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:11 is a seemingly minor genealogical entry, its profound Christ-centered fulfillment lies in its contribution to the unbroken chain of humanity through which God's redemptive plan unfolded, culminating in Jesus Christ. Every name, including Chelub, Mehir, and Eshton, represents a vital link in the divinely preserved lineage that ultimately led to the birth of the Messiah. The Chronicler's meticulous record of the tribe of Judah implicitly points to the fulfillment of the ancient promise that the scepter would not depart from Judah until Shiloh came (Genesis 49:10). Jesus, born "in the fullness of time" (Galatians 4:4), is the ultimate heir to the Davidic throne, a direct descendant of Judah (as seen in the genealogies of Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38). Thus, even these brief mentions in 1 Chronicles serve to highlight God's sovereign control over history, ensuring that the promised Savior would arrive precisely according to His divine timetable and through the designated lineage, demonstrating His unwavering commitment to redeem humanity through the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 11–23

We may observe in these verses, 1. That here is a whole family of craftsmen, handicraft tradesmen, that applied themselves to all sorts of manufactures, in which they were ingenious and industrious above their neighbours, Ch1 4:14. There was a valley where they lived which was, from them, called the valley of craftsmen. Those that are craftsmen are not therefore to be looked upon as mean men. These craftsmen, though two of a trade often disagree, yet chose to live together, for the improving of arts by comparing notes, and that they might support one another's reputation. 2. That one of these married the daughter of Pharaoh (Ch1 4:18), which was the common name of the kings of Egypt. If an Israelite in Egypt before the bondage began, while Joseph's merits were yet fresh in mind, was preferred to be the king's son-in-law, it is not to be thought strange: few Israelites could, like Moses, refuse an alliance with the court. 3. That another is said to be the father of the house of those that wrought fine linen, Ch1 4:21. It is inserted in their genealogy as their honour that they were the best weavers in the kingdom, and they brought up their children, from one generation to another, to the same business, not aiming to make them gentlemen. This Laadah is said to be the father of those that wrought fine linen, as before the flood Jubal is said to be the father of musicians and Jabal of shepherds, etc. His posterity inhabited the city of Mareshah, the manufacture or staple commodity of which place was linen-cloth, with which their kings and priests were clothed. 4. That another family had had dominion in Moab, but were now in servitude in Babylon, Ch1 4:22, Ch1 4:23. (1.) It was found among the ancient things that they had the dominion in Moab. Probably in David's time, when that country was conquered, they transplanted themselves thither, and were put in places of power there, which they held for several generations; but this was a great while ago, time out of mind. (2.) Their posterity were now potters and gardeners, as is supposed in Babylon, where they dwelt with the king for his work, got a good livelihood by their industry, and therefore cared not for returning with their brethren to their own land, after the years of captivity had expired. Those that now have dominion know not what their posterity may be reduced to, nor what mean employments they may be glad to take up with. But those were unworthy the name of Israelites that would dwell among plants and hedges rather than be at the pains to return to Canaan.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.