TRV
Translation
King James Version
And Eshton begat Bethrapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of Irnahash. These are the men of Rechah.
Complete Jewish Bible
Eshton fathered Beit-Rafa, Paseach and T'chinah the father of 'Ir-Nachash. These are the men of Rekhah.
Berean Standard Bible
Eshton was the father of Beth-rapha, of Paseah, and of Tehinnah the father of Ir-nahash. These were the men of Recah.
American Standard Version
And Eshton begat Beth-rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of Ir-nahash. These are the men of Recah.
World English Bible Messianic
Eshton became the father of Beth Rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of Ir Nahash. These are the men of Recah.
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Eshton begate Beth-rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of the citie of Nahash: these are the men of Rechah.
Young's Literal Translation
And Eshton begat Beth-Rapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah father of Ir-Nahash; these are men of Rechah.
In the KJVVerse 10,398 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 11–23
11 ¶ And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which was the father of Eshton.
12 And Eshton begat Bethrapha, and Paseah, and Tehinnah the father of Irnahash. These are the men of Rechah.
13 And the sons of Kenaz; Othniel, and Seraiah: and the sons of Othniel; Hathath.
14 And Meonothai begat Ophrah: and Seraiah begat Joab, the father of the valley of Charashim; for they were craftsmen.
15 And the sons of Caleb the son of Jephunneh; Iru, Elah, and Naam: and the sons of Elah, even Kenaz.
16 And the sons of Jehaleleel; Ziph, and Ziphah, Tiria, and Asareel.
17 And the sons of Ezra were, Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon: and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
18 And his wife Jehudijah bare Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father of Socho, and Jekuthiel the father of Zanoah. And these are the sons of Bithiah the daughter of Pharaoh, which Mered took.
19 And the sons of his wife Hodiah the sister of Naham, the father of Keilah the Garmite, and Eshtemoa the Maachathite.
20 And the sons of Shimon were, Amnon, and Rinnah, Benhanan, and Tilon. And the sons of Ishi were, Zoheth, and Benzoheth.
21 The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and Laadah the father of Mareshah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea,
22 And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things.
23 These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges: there they dwelt with the king for his work.
We may observe in these verses, 1. That here is a whole family of craftsmen, handicraft tradesmen, that applied themselves to all sorts of manufactures, in which they were ingenious and industrious above their neighbours, Ch1 4:14. There was a valley where they lived which was, from them, called the valley of craftsmen. Those that are craftsmen are not therefore to be looked upon as mean men. These craftsmen, though two of a trade often disagree, yet chose to live together, for the improving of arts by comparing notes, and that they might support one another's reputation. 2. That one of these married the daughter of Pharaoh (Ch1 4:18), which was the common name of the kings of Egypt. If an Israelite in Egypt before the bondage began, while Joseph's merits were yet fresh in mind, was preferred to be the king's son-in-law, it is not to be thought strange: few Israelites could, like Moses, refuse an alliance with the court. 3. That another is said to be the father of the house of those that wrought fine linen, Ch1 4:21. It is inserted in their genealogy as their honour that they were the best weavers in the kingdom, and they brought up their children, from one generation to another, to the same business, not aiming to make them gentlemen. This Laadah is said to be the father of those that wrought fine linen, as before the flood Jubal is said to be the father of musicians and Jabal of shepherds, etc. His posterity inhabited the city of Mareshah, the manufacture or staple commodity of which place was linen-cloth, with which their kings and priests were clothed. 4. That another family had had dominion in Moab, but were now in servitude in Babylon, Ch1 4:22, Ch1 4:23. (1.) It was found among the ancient things that they had the dominion in Moab. Probably in David's time, when that country was conquered, they transplanted themselves thither, and were put in places of power there, which they held for several generations; but this was a great while ago, time out of mind. (2.) Their posterity were now potters and gardeners, as is supposed in Babylon, where they dwelt with the king for his work, got a good livelihood by their industry, and therefore cared not for returning with their brethren to their own land, after the years of captivity had expired. Those that now have dominion know not what their posterity may be reduced to, nor what mean employments they may be glad to take up with. But those were unworthy the name of Israelites that would dwell among plants and hedges rather than be at the pains to return to Canaan.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
1 Chronicles 4:12 is a concise yet significant entry within the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Judah, meticulously detailing descendants of Eshton, specifically Bethrapha, Paseah, and Tehinnah, who is identified as the father of Irnahash. The verse concludes by associating these individuals as "the men of Rechah," indicating a specific geographical or communal affiliation. As part of the Chronicler's comprehensive record, this verse underscores the divine preservation of lineage, the historical continuity vital for the post-exilic community's identity, and its foundational role in the unfolding of God's redemptive plan.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 4:12 is situated within the lengthy genealogical records that dominate the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. These chapters meticulously trace the lineage of Israel from Adam, through the various tribes, culminating in the establishment of the monarchy and the priestly lines. Specifically, this verse falls within the detailed genealogy of Judah (1 Chronicles 4:1-23), a tribe of paramount importance due to its royal destiny, from which King David emerged and, ultimately, the Messiah. The Chronicler's primary purpose in compiling these detailed lists for the post-exilic community was multifaceted: to re-establish tribal identities, validate land claims, confirm priestly and Levitical lines, and reinforce their unbroken connection to a sacred past and the covenant promises of God. While many names in these lists appear as mere entries, they collectively serve as a foundational anchor for understanding the historical continuity and divine faithfulness. Notably, this verse follows the well-known prayer of Jabez in 1 Chronicles 4:9-10, illustrating that even within dense genealogical lists, significant narratives or figures are occasionally highlighted, though 1 Chronicles 4:12 itself is a straightforward lineage entry.
Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of 1 Chronicles was written after the Babylonian exile, likely in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE. For the returning exiles, who faced immense challenges of identity, land ownership, and religious purity, these genealogies were not mere historical curiosities but vital legal, social, and religious documents. They provided a tangible link to their ancestral heritage, confirming who belonged to which tribe, who could legitimately serve in the priesthood, and who had rightful claims to ancestral lands. In a society where identity was largely communal and familial, knowing one's lineage was crucial for social standing, marriage alliances, and full participation in religious life. The meticulous detail, even for seemingly minor figures like those mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:12, reflects the Chronicler's concern with establishing an unbroken chain from the patriarchs to his contemporary audience, thereby reinforcing God's enduring faithfulness to His people despite the trauma of exile. The reference to "men of Rechah" indicates a specific community or place, which, though its exact location is now lost to us, would have been a recognizable identifier for the original audience, further solidifying the historical and geographical reality of these individuals.
Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 4:12, like other genealogical entries, contributes to several overarching themes in the Chronicler's work. First, there is the profound theme of Divine Preservation of Lineage, emphasizing God's meticulous and sovereign care in maintaining specific family lines. This was absolutely essential for the fulfillment of His covenants, particularly the Abrahamic covenant (see Genesis 12:1-3) and the Davidic covenant (see 2 Samuel 7:12-16), both of which promised an enduring seed and an eternal kingdom. Second, these records serve as a crucial Historical Record and Identity Marker, providing the post-exilic community with a foundational sense of belonging and continuity. They connected individuals to their tribal heritage and their rightful place within God's chosen people, reinforcing their collective identity as the true Israel. Finally, the sheer detail, even for obscure figures, highlights God's Attention to Every Individual. It suggests that every person, every generation, and every family plays a part, however small or seemingly insignificant, in God's overarching plan for history and redemption. This meticulous record-keeping reflects a divine perspective that values each life within the grand tapestry of salvation history, ultimately pointing towards the coming of the Messiah, whose lineage would be meticulously traced (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17).
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:12, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form that serves multiple purposes: establishing historical continuity, validating claims to land and status, and demonstrating divine faithfulness through the preservation of lineage. The underlying "begat" formula, though not explicitly repeated in every instance within this specific verse, is the foundational structure of the broader genealogical section, creating a rhythmic, authoritative tone that emphasizes the unbroken chain of generations. Furthermore, the use of specific, often descriptive, names like "Irnahash" (City of the Serpent) reflects Onomastics (the study of names), where names can carry symbolic weight or provide geographical clues, even if their full significance is now lost to the modern reader. The verse also employs Identification by Association, linking individuals to a specific place ("men of Rechah"), which acts as a form of Metonymy or Synecdoche, where the place stands for the community or group originating from it, providing crucial context for the original audience.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Chronicles 4:12, though a seemingly obscure genealogical entry, is deeply significant within the broader theological framework of the Old Testament. It underscores God's meticulous involvement in human history, demonstrating His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises through the careful preservation of specific lineages. The Chronicler's post-exilic audience would have found immense comfort and reassurance in these records, understanding that even amidst displacement and loss, God had maintained the thread of His chosen people. This attention to detail, even for seemingly minor figures, reflects a divine perspective that values every individual and every generation as part of a grand, unfolding narrative orchestrated by God. It highlights that God's plans are long-term, spanning centuries, and that He works through ordinary people and their family lines to bring about His extraordinary purposes, ultimately culminating in the promised Messiah. The very existence of such detailed records testifies to God's sovereign control over history and His commitment to His redemptive purposes.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
In a world that often values only the prominent, the powerful, and the publicly acclaimed, 1 Chronicles 4:12 serves as a profound reminder that God's perspective is vastly different. This seemingly mundane list of names, many of whom we know nothing else about, is meticulously preserved in the sacred text. It teaches us that every individual, no matter how seemingly insignificant in the grand scheme of human history or our own lives, is known, valued, and purposed by God. Our lives, our families, and our heritage are not random occurrences but are intricately woven into the magnificent tapestry of God's sovereign plan. This profound truth should encourage us to find deep significance not just in our achievements or public recognition, but in simply being part of God's ongoing story, faithfully living out our calling in our own generation. It also invites us to consider our own spiritual heritage—the "cloud of witnesses" who have gone before us—and to recognize that we are part of a continuous lineage of faith, called to steward the Gospel and pass on the torch of truth to those who come after us, knowing that our quiet faithfulness is seen and cherished by God.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why are these genealogies so long and seemingly irrelevant to modern readers?
Answer: While they may seem tedious or irrelevant to us today, these genealogies were profoundly significant for the original audience, the Jewish community returning from Babylonian exile. They served several crucial purposes:
What is the significance of names like "Irnahash" or "Rechah" when their exact locations or meanings are unknown today?
Answer: The specific meaning or precise location of "Irnahash" ("City of the Serpent") and "Rechah" ("softness" or a place name) is indeed lost to us in modern times. However, their inclusion highlights the Chronicler's commitment to historical accuracy and detail for his original audience. For them, these names would have been recognizable geographical or communal markers, providing precise context for the individuals listed and their tribal affiliations. Even without knowing their exact significance today, their presence underscores that these were real people in real places, part of a tangible historical and tribal structure. It reminds us that the Bible is deeply rooted in history, and while some specific details may fade with time, the overarching message of God's work through generations remains clear and historically grounded.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The meticulous preservation of lineages, exemplified by 1 Chronicles 4:12, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. These seemingly dry lists are not merely historical curiosities but are the very backbone upon which the promise of a coming Redeemer rests. God's faithfulness, so evident in His care to record every generation, culminates in the arrival of the "seed" promised to Abraham (Galatians 3:16) and the "son" promised to David (Romans 1:3). The genealogies in Matthew and Luke trace Jesus' lineage directly back through Judah and David, demonstrating that He is the rightful heir to the throne, the Lion of the tribe of Judah (Revelation 5:5), and the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). Thus, 1 Chronicles 4:12, like every genealogical entry, quietly but powerfully anticipates the Incarnation, revealing God's long-term, unwavering commitment to bring salvation to humanity through a specific, divinely preserved lineage, culminating in the "fullness of time" when Christ appeared (Galatians 4:4) to redeem all who believe.