TRV
- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
Proverbs 22:26
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Proverbs 22:26–27.
We have here, as often before, a caution against suretiship, as a thing both imprudent and unjust. 1. We must not associate ourselves, nor contract an intimacy, with men of broken fortunes, and reputations, who need and will urge their friends to be bound for them, that they may cheat their neighbours to feed their lusts, and by keeping up a little longer may do the more damage at last to those that give them credit. Have nothing to do with such; be not thou among them. 2. We must not cheat people of their money, by striking hands ourselves, or becoming surety for others, when we have not to pay. If a man by the divine providence is disabled to pay his debts, he ought to be pitied and helped; but he that takes up money or goods himself, or is bound for another, when he knows that he has not wherewithal to pay, or that what he has is so settled that the creditors cannot come at it, does in effect pick his neighbour's pocket, and though, in all cases, compassion is to be used, yet he may thank himself if the law have its course and his bed be taken from under him, which might be taken for a pledge to secure a debt, Exo 22:26, Exo 22:27. For, if a man appeared to be so poor that he had nothing else to give for security, he ought to be relieved, and it was honestly done to own it; but, for the recovery of a debt, it seems it might be taken by the summum jus - the strict operation of law. 3. We must not ruin our own estates and families. Every man ought to be just to himself and to his wife and children; those are not so who live above what they have, who by the mismanagement of their own affairs, or by encumbering themselves with debts of others, waste what they have and bring themselves to poverty. We may take joyfully the spoiling of our goods if it be for the testimony of a good conscience; but, if be for our own rashness and folly, we cannot but take it heavily.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
Do not be with those who bind their hands, etc. Do not be with those who, though free and keeping themselves available to themselves, bind themselves in the care of the salvation of the wicked, promising to render an account to the Lord for their souls. If he for whom you stood surety does not have good works to make you free and secure of your surety, what good is it to you to be judged for his soul on the day of judgment and to lose the habit of righteousness with which you seemed to be clothed? Hence also the Lord: The harvest indeed is plentiful, but the laborers are few (Matt. IX).
Continue studying Proverbs 22:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Proverbs 22:26 delivers a profound and timeless admonition against the perilous practice of becoming a financial guarantor for another's debt. This wisdom literature cautions against the ancient custom of "striking hands," a formal gesture signifying a binding commitment to assume the financial liabilities of a third party. The verse serves as a crucial warning, urging prudence, foresight, and personal responsibility in financial dealings to protect oneself and one's household from the potential ruin that can accompany reckless suretyship.
Context
Literary Context
Proverbs 22:26 is situated within a significant collection known as the "Sayings of the Wise" (Proverbs 22:17–24:34), a distinct section that follows the earlier Solomonic proverbs. This segment of Proverbs is characterized by its practical, ethical, and social instructions, frequently addressing themes of diligence, honesty, justice, and, notably, financial prudence. The immediate preceding verses in Proverbs 22 speak to the dangers of oppression, the importance of wisdom, and the consequences of various behaviors, making this verse a natural continuation of practical life guidance. It flows seamlessly from general warnings about wealth and poverty into specific financial pitfalls, emphasizing personal responsibility and the avoidance of entanglements that could lead to severe economic distress.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, as in many pre-modern societies, formal banking institutions as we know them were non-existent. Financial transactions, loans, and commercial agreements often relied on personal trust and solemn pledges. When someone needed a loan, and their creditworthiness was questionable, a third party might "strike hands" with the lender, thereby becoming a surety or guarantor. This handshake was far more than a casual gesture; it was a legally binding custom, signifying that the guarantor would assume the debt if the primary borrower defaulted. Such agreements were not merely informal promises but carried significant social and legal weight, often leading to devastating consequences for the surety, including forced labor, loss of property, or even personal enslavement, as implied in passages like Proverbs 6:1-5. The strong warning in this verse reflects the very real and devastating impact that such financial commitments could have on an individual and their household in an agrarian, honor-based society where one's livelihood was directly tied to land and personal freedom.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Proverbs and biblical wisdom literature. Primarily, it underscores financial responsibility and prudence, advocating for a cautious and discerning approach to personal resources and commitments, a recurring motif throughout the book (e.g., Proverbs 13:11). It also highlights the theme of avoiding reckless commitments, emphasizing the need for thoughtful discernment over impulsive generosity, especially when such actions jeopardize one's own stability and the well-being of one's family. The most prominent theme is the danger of suretyship, a practice consistently condemned in Proverbs (see Proverbs 11:15 and Proverbs 17:18), which warns against the entanglement and potential ruin that comes from guaranteeing another's debt. This counsel is rooted in a broader understanding of wisdom as practical righteousness, guiding individuals to live wisely in all areas of life, including their finances, to ensure long-term prosperity and integrity.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root means "to clatter, slap, or drive." In the context of Proverbs 22:26, it refers to the forceful, decisive action of handclasping, which formally sealed an agreement or pledge. It signifies the solemn and legally significant commitment made when one became a guarantor, indicating a deliberate and binding act of assuming responsibility. This is not a casual touch but a firm, public declaration.
This noun refers to the hollow hand or palm. The idiomatic phrase "strike hands" (tâqaʻ kaph) was a common ancient expression for sealing a contract or pledge, particularly a financial guarantee. Its inclusion emphasizes the physical, public, and binding nature of the agreement, making the commitment tangible, undeniable, and witnessed.
A primitive root meaning "to braid, intermix, or give security." This term directly denotes the act of becoming a guarantor or pledging oneself for another's debt. It highlights the deep entanglement and assumption of liability that the act of suretyship entails, where one's financial well-being becomes inextricably intertwined with another's, often to one's detriment.
This feminine noun means "a loan" or "anything owed." This specifies the precise nature of the financial obligation being guaranteed. The warning is not against general promises but specifically against assuming responsibility for another's financial liabilities, underscoring the direct monetary risk involved and the potential for significant loss.
Verse Breakdown
"Be not thou [one] of them that strike hands"
This is a direct, imperative command, a strong prohibition against participating in the ancient custom of formally sealing a financial pledge for another. The "striking of hands" was the ancient equivalent of co-signing a loan or providing a personal guarantee, making the guarantor legally and financially responsible for the debt. The wisdom here is to avoid entering into such high-risk, binding agreements.
"[or] of them that are sureties for debts"
This clause serves as a synonymous parallel, clarifying and reinforcing the first part of the verse. It explicitly defines the nature of the "striking hands" as becoming a "surety" – one who stands as security or pledge – for another's financial obligations. The repetition underscores the gravity of the warning and leaves no ambiguity about the specific financial practice being condemned, emphasizing the danger of assuming another's financial burden.
Literary Devices
Proverbs 22:26 employs several literary devices to convey its urgent and practical message. Metonymy is evident in the phrase "strike hands," where the physical action of clasping hands stands in for the entire, complex legal and financial agreement of suretyship. This allows for a concise yet powerful representation of the profound commitment involved. The verse also utilizes synonymous parallelism, presenting the same core warning in two slightly different but complementary phrases: "them that strike hands" and "them that are sureties for debts." This repetition serves to reinforce the message, emphasizing the specific nature of the prohibited action and ensuring clarity and emphasis. Furthermore, the use of the imperative mood ("Be not thou") delivers a direct, authoritative, and unmistakable prohibition, underscoring the strong counsel against this financially perilous practice.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The wisdom of Proverbs 22:26 is deeply rooted in a theological understanding of stewardship and trust. It implicitly encourages reliance on God's provision and wise management of resources rather than placing one's financial security at the mercy of another's potential failure. While not forbidding all forms of generosity, it sharply distinguishes between charitable giving and assuming a binding, high-risk financial liability for someone else, which can lead to personal ruin and an inability to fulfill one's own responsibilities. The consistent warnings against suretyship throughout Proverbs highlight a divine principle: while compassion is vital, reckless financial entanglement is not true wisdom and can undermine one's ability to live righteously, honorably, and effectively serve God and neighbor. This counsel reflects God's desire for His people to live in freedom and security, unburdened by unnecessary financial chains.
Reflection and Application
Proverbs 22:26 offers timeless wisdom that transcends ancient customs, speaking directly and powerfully to contemporary financial practices. In an age of easy credit, complex financial instruments, and relational pressures, the principle remains starkly relevant: avoid putting yourself in a position where you are legally responsible for another's debt. This applies directly to co-signing loans for vehicles, mortgages, or student debt, acting as a guarantor for rentals, or taking on any financial obligation where your own assets, credit, or future income are at significant risk due to someone else's potential default. While our hearts may genuinely desire to help friends or family in need, true wisdom often means finding alternative, less perilous ways to assist that do not jeopardize our own financial stability or the long-term well-being of our households. This verse calls us to a high level of discernment, prudence, and self-control, encouraging us to be wise stewards of the resources God has entrusted to us, ensuring we can meet our own obligations, provide for our families, and remain free to serve Him effectively without the crushing burden of another's debt.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does "strike hands" mean in Proverbs 22:26?
In the context of Proverbs 22:26, "strike hands" refers to an ancient custom where two individuals would clasp or slap hands together to seal a formal agreement or contract. Specifically, it denotes the act of pledging oneself as a guarantor or "surety" for another person's debt. By striking hands, one was making a solemn, legally binding commitment to assume responsibility for the financial obligation if the primary borrower failed to pay. This was a common practice in a society without modern banking systems, and it carried significant risk for the guarantor, as highlighted throughout the book of Proverbs. It was a public and tangible sign of a serious, high-stakes financial promise.
Why is being a "surety for debts" warned against so strongly in Proverbs?
The book of Proverbs consistently warns against being a "surety for debts" because it is considered a profoundly unwise and perilous financial practice. The primary reason is the high risk of personal ruin. If the primary debtor defaults, the surety becomes fully responsible for the debt, which could lead to loss of property, freedom (through indentured servitude), or severe financial distress for their own family. Proverbs emphasizes prudence, financial responsibility, and avoiding unnecessary entanglements that threaten one's well-being and ability to provide for one's household. Passages like Proverbs 6:1-5 and Proverbs 11:15 vividly illustrate the potential consequences, urging individuals to protect their own resources rather than jeopardizing them for another's financial liabilities. It's a call to wisdom over impulsive or naive generosity in financial matters, recognizing that true help should not lead to one's own destruction.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Proverbs 22:26 warns against the folly and danger of human suretyship, it inadvertently points to the profound and perfect suretyship of Jesus Christ. Humanity incurred an insurmountable debt of sin, a spiritual obligation that no human could ever repay or guarantee. Yet, Christ, in His infinite love and divine wisdom, willingly became our ultimate surety. He "struck hands" with the Father on our behalf, not in a reckless or foolish act, but with deliberate, redemptive purpose. As the author of Hebrews declares, Jesus has become the "guarantee of a better covenant" (Hebrews 7:22). He took upon Himself the full weight of our spiritual debt, bearing our sin and its penalty on the cross (2 Corinthians 5:21). Unlike human guarantors who risk ruin, Christ, through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, fully paid the debt, securing our salvation and eternal life without any risk to His divine nature. His suretyship is not a warning to avoid, but the very foundation of our hope and the ultimate demonstration of God's perfect love and wisdom (Romans 5:8), offering us freedom from the debt we could never pay.