Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89
We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,
I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.
II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.
1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.
2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.
3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.
4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.
5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.
7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!
8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.
Continue studying Numbers 7:87 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 7:87 serves as the grand summation of the collective offerings presented by the twelve tribal leaders of Israel during the dedication of the newly erected Tabernacle. This verse meticulously tallies the total number of animals—bullocks, rams, lambs, and goats—designated for burnt offerings and sin offerings, alongside their accompanying grain offerings. It underscores the immense scale of the nation's unified devotion, highlighting their corporate commitment to God and His prescribed rituals for worship and atonement at the heart of their new covenant relationship.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Numbers 7:87 powerfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. The most prominent is Repetition, specifically the insistent recurrence of the number "twelve." This emphatic repetition serves as a powerful rhetorical device, underscoring the unity and completeness of the Israelite nation's participation in the Tabernacle dedication. It reinforces the idea that all tribes, as a single, unified entity, were involved in this monumental act of worship and consecration. The verse also functions as a Culmination, bringing the preceding lengthy and detailed narrative of individual tribal offerings (Numbers 7:10-83) to a grand, collective summary. This provides a sense of closure and emphasizes the immense scale and corporate nature of the dedication. Furthermore, the number twelve itself is rich in Symbolism within biblical literature, representing divine government, completeness, and the chosen people of God (the twelve tribes). The various animal offerings also carry symbolic weight, representing different aspects of atonement, dedication, and purification within the Israelite sacrificial system.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 7:87, as the culmination of the Tabernacle dedication offerings, powerfully articulates the theological themes of corporate worship, national consecration, and the profound significance of sacrifice in maintaining covenant relationship with a holy God. The unified offering from all twelve tribes underscores the concept of Israel as a single, chosen people, bound together by covenant and called to worship God in unity. It demonstrates their corporate responsibility and collective dedication to the Lord, acknowledging His dwelling among them and their reliance on His provision for atonement and fellowship. The sheer volume and variety of the offerings—burnt offerings for complete devotion and sin offerings for purification—reveal the comprehensive nature of their worship, encompassing both surrender and the need for cleansing. This collective act of costly worship was an expression of their identity as God's people, wholly devoted and continually seeking His favor through the prescribed means.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While the Old Testament sacrificial system has been fulfilled in Christ, the principles embedded in Numbers 7:87 remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse calls us to reflect on the nature of our corporate worship and individual dedication. Just as the twelve tribes united in their lavish offerings, we are called to participate wholeheartedly and generously in the life of the church, recognizing our shared identity as the body of Christ. Our worship should be marked by unity, a collective commitment to God's purposes, and a willingness to offer our best. The costly nature of these ancient sacrifices challenges us to consider the true value of our own "offerings"—our time, talents, resources, and very lives—as we present them to God. Are we giving generously, not out of obligation, but out of a heart of gratitude and devotion? Furthermore, the distinction between burnt offerings (total dedication) and sin offerings (purification) reminds us that our walk with God involves both complete surrender to His will and a continual reliance on His grace for cleansing and forgiveness. We are called to live lives of consecration, acknowledging our need for Christ's atoning work daily.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is the number twelve so prominent in this verse and the surrounding narrative?
Answer: The prominence of the number "twelve" is highly symbolic and significant. It represents the twelve tribes of Israel, signifying the complete and unified participation of the entire nation in the dedication of the Tabernacle. It underscores that this was a corporate act of worship and consecration by all of God's chosen people. In biblical numerology, "twelve" often symbolizes divine order, governmental perfection, and completeness, further emphasizing the holistic nature of this national offering. This collective action is a powerful picture of the unity God desires for His people, a theme seen from the patriarchs through the establishment of the nation.
What was the purpose of the "meat offering" mentioned alongside the lambs for the burnt offering?
Answer: The "meat offering" (Hebrew: minchâh, H4503) is more accurately translated as "grain offering" or "tribute offering." It typically consisted of fine flour, olive oil, and frankincense, sometimes baked into bread or cakes. While not an atoning sacrifice for sin in itself, the grain offering often accompanied burnt offerings or peace offerings. Its purpose was to express gratitude, devotion, and acknowledgment of God's provision. It symbolized the dedication of the fruits of the land and human labor to God, recognizing that all sustenance and blessings come from Him (as detailed in Leviticus 2:1-16). It was a bloodless offering, complementing the animal sacrifices by representing the offerer's daily sustenance and labor given back to God.
Did each tribal leader individually bring all these animals mentioned in Numbers 7:87?
Answer: No, Numbers 7:87 provides the sum total of all the animals offered by the twelve tribal leaders collectively. The preceding verses (Numbers 7:10-83) detail that each of the twelve leaders brought identical offerings on their designated day. For example, each leader brought one bullock for a burnt offering, one ram, one lamb, and one kid of the goats for a sin offering. Therefore, the "twelve bullocks," "twelve rams," "twelve lambs," and "twelve kids of the goats" represent the combined total from all twelve individual contributions, emphasizing the unity and collective scale of the nation's dedication to the Tabernacle. This cumulative reporting highlights the immense corporate act of worship.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Numbers 7:87, with its meticulous tally of burnt offerings and sin offerings, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect sacrifice of Jesus Christ. The collective and comprehensive nature of these ancient offerings, representing the entire nation's need for atonement and dedication, finds its complete fulfillment in the single, all-sufficient offering of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. The burnt offerings, symbolizing total consecration and acceptance before God, point to Christ's perfect obedience and His complete surrender to the Father's will, even to the point of death on the cross (as seen in Philippians 2:8). His life was a perfect "burnt offering" of devotion. Similarly, the sin offerings, designed for purification and the removal of defilement, are perfectly fulfilled in Christ, who "made purification for sins" (as described in Hebrews 1:3). Unlike the repeated animal sacrifices that could never truly take away sins (Hebrews 10:4), Christ's "one sacrifice for sins has made perfect forever those who are being made holy" (Hebrews 10:14). Through His atoning work, believers are now called to offer themselves as "living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God" (Romans 12:1), participating in the dedication that Christ Himself perfectly accomplished on our behalf and finding our unity in Him, the true spiritual temple (Ephesians 2:20-22).