Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 it came to pass G1096, as Jesus G2424 sat at meat G345 in G1722 the house G3614,G2532 behold G2400, many G4183 publicans G5057 and G2532 sinners G268 came G2064 and sat down G4873 with him G846 and G2532 his G846 disciples G3101.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
WhileYeshua was in the house eating, many tax-collectors and sinners came and joined him and his talmidim at the meal.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Later, as Jesus was dining at Matthew’s house, many tax collectors and sinners came and ate with Him and His disciples.
Ask
American Standard Version
And it came to pass, as he sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with Jesus and his disciples.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
As he sat in the house, behold, many tax collectors and sinners came and sat down with Yeshua and his disciples.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And it came to passe, as Iesus sate at meate in his house, beholde, many Publicanes and sinners, that came thither, sate downe at the table with Iesus and his disciples.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And it came to pass, he reclining (at meat) in the house, that lo, many tax-gatherers and sinners having come, were lying (at meat) with Jesus and his disciples,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Levant)
All Matthew Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Matthew Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 23,390 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Matthew 9:10 presents a pivotal scene in Jesus' ministry, depicting His radical inclusivity as He shares a meal with a diverse group of publicans and sinners. This event, occurring immediately after Jesus calls Matthew, a tax collector, into discipleship, starkly contrasts with the rigid social and religious norms of the day, powerfully illustrating Jesus' mission to seek and save those considered outcasts by the religious establishment, thereby extending grace and fellowship to the marginalized.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within Matthew's Gospel, following Jesus' authoritative acts of healing and the calling of Matthew (Levi) in Matthew 9:9. The meal described here is widely understood to be hosted by Matthew himself, serving as his farewell feast or a celebratory gathering for his new master. The immediate consequence of this meal is the Pharisees' criticism of Jesus' association with "sinners," which prompts Jesus' profound declaration in Matthew 9:12-13 that "They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick" and His call for them to "Go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice." This sequence highlights Jesus' intentional engagement with the ostracized and sets the stage for His teaching on mercy over legalistic adherence.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In 1st-century Judea, tax collectors, or "publicans," were among the most reviled members of society. They were Jewish individuals who collaborated with the Roman occupying power, often extorting more than the required taxes for personal profit, making them despised as traitors and thieves. Furthermore, their frequent contact with Gentiles and their dishonest practices rendered them ritually unclean in the eyes of devout Jews. "Sinners" was a broader term encompassing not only those who overtly violated Mosaic Law but also those who, by profession or lifestyle, were considered morally corrupt or outside the bounds of acceptable religious practice. Sharing a meal in this culture was a profound act of fellowship, intimacy, and acceptance. For a rabbi or respected teacher to recline at table with such individuals was scandalous, implying an endorsement of their lifestyle and a disregard for ritual purity laws.
  • Key Themes: Matthew 9:10 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in Matthew's Gospel. It powerfully illustrates Jesus' radical inclusivity and mission to the lost, demonstrating His primary purpose to seek and save those considered beyond the pale of religious society, rather than merely associating with the self-proclaimed righteous. This act of dining with outcasts underscores the theme of God's grace extending beyond traditional boundaries, challenging the prevailing legalistic interpretations of righteousness. It also highlights the nature of true discipleship, as Jesus' followers participate in this counter-cultural act, learning to embrace His mission to reach all people. This event foreshadows Jesus' later parables and teachings about the Kingdom of God being open to all, including those who are marginalized, as seen in the parable of the Great Banquet in Luke 14:15-24.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sat at meat (Greek, anakeîmai', G345): Meaning "to recline (as a corpse or at a meal)." This word specifically refers to the common practice of reclining on couches while eating, rather than sitting upright. This posture was typical for formal meals and banquets in the ancient world, signifying a relaxed, intimate, and extended period of fellowship rather than a quick, casual encounter. Its use here emphasizes the deliberate and significant nature of Jesus' shared meal.
  • publicans (Greek, telṓnēs', G5057): Meaning "a tax-farmer, i.e. collector of public revenue." This term denotes individuals who purchased the right to collect taxes from the Roman government. They were notorious for their corruption, often demanding excessive amounts for personal gain, and were deeply despised by their Jewish compatriots who viewed them as traitors collaborating with the occupying power. Their presence at the meal highlights the scandalous nature of Jesus' association.
  • sinners (Greek, hamartōlós', G268): Meaning "sinful, i.e. a sinner." This term broadly describes those who "miss the mark" or fall short of God's moral and religious standards. In the context of 1st-century Judaism, it often referred to individuals who were perceived as habitually disregarding the Mosaic Law or living immoral lives, thereby placing them outside the circle of the "righteous" or "pious." The combination with "publicans" emphasizes the depth of social and religious ostracism these individuals faced.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house": This clause sets the scene, indicating that the event occurred during a meal where Jesus was reclining, a posture of intimate fellowship. The "house" is generally understood to be Matthew's (Levi's) home, providing a private yet public setting for this controversial gathering. The phrase "it came to pass" (G1096, gínomai) simply introduces the narrative event, signaling its occurrence.
  • "behold, many publicans and sinners came": The interjection "behold" (G2400, idoú) draws attention to the surprising and significant arrival of a large number of individuals who were socially and religiously marginalized. The collective presence of "many publicans and sinners" underscores the scale of Jesus' radical outreach and the nature of the company He kept. Their "coming" (G2064, érchomai) implies an intentional act of drawing near to Jesus, perhaps drawn by His reputation for healing and teaching.
  • "and sat down with him and his disciples": This final clause emphasizes the crucial act of fellowship. The publicans and sinners not only came but "sat down with" (G4873, synanákeimai) Jesus and His disciples, indicating that they were welcomed to share the meal and participate in the intimate setting. This act of shared table fellowship was a powerful sign of acceptance and inclusion, directly challenging the prevailing social and religious barriers that separated these groups from the "righteous."

Literary Devices

Matthew 9:10 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound message. Juxtaposition is central, placing the holy figure of Jesus alongside the ritually and morally "unclean" publicans and sinners. This stark contrast immediately highlights Jesus' unique mission and challenges the conventional understanding of holiness. There is also an element of Irony, as those whom society and the religious elite deemed unworthy of God's presence are precisely the ones Jesus chooses to associate with, while the "righteous" (the Pharisees, as seen in the subsequent verses) are the ones who stand apart in judgment. Finally, the Symbolism of the shared meal is paramount. In ancient culture, eating together signified acceptance, peace, and shared life. By dining with publicans and sinners, Jesus was not merely having a casual meal; He was symbolically extending the boundaries of God's fellowship and demonstrating the inclusive nature of His Kingdom.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Matthew 9:10 profoundly illustrates the core of Jesus' ministry: His mission to the marginalized and His revolutionary approach to righteousness. This event underscores that God's grace is not reserved for the outwardly pious but is freely offered to all who recognize their need for it. Jesus' willingness to cross social and religious boundaries to engage with tax collectors and sinners reveals a divine compassion that prioritizes spiritual healing and restoration over ritual purity or social convention. It challenges the human tendency to create exclusive religious circles and instead calls for an expansive, merciful embrace of all people, reflecting God's own heart for the lost and broken. This act of fellowship foreshadows the radical inclusivity of the new covenant community, where all are welcome at God's table through faith in Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Matthew 9:10 serves as a powerful mirror for contemporary believers, challenging us to critically examine our own attitudes and practices regarding inclusivity and outreach. Jesus' example compels us to move beyond comfortable, homogenous circles and intentionally engage with those whom society, or even the church, might marginalize or deem "unworthy." This means cultivating a heart of genuine compassion that sees beyond labels, past mistakes, or social standing, recognizing that every individual is created in God's image and is in desperate need of His transforming grace. True discipleship, as modeled by Jesus, involves actively seeking out opportunities to extend fellowship, build bridges, and share the hope of the Gospel with those who are often overlooked or ostracized. It calls us to embody the welcoming heart of Christ, ensuring that our communities are places where the broken, the hurting, and the outcast can find acceptance, healing, and a pathway to God.

Questions for Reflection

  • Who are the "publicans and sinners" in my community or social circles today, and how do I typically interact with them?
  • What social or religious barriers might I be inadvertently upholding that prevent me from extending genuine fellowship to others?
  • How can I more intentionally follow Jesus' example of radical inclusivity in my daily life and within my faith community?

FAQ

Why was it so scandalous for Jesus to eat with publicans and sinners?

Answer: In 1st-century Jewish society, sharing a meal was a deeply significant act of fellowship, acceptance, and even shared identity. For a respected rabbi like Jesus to recline at table with "publicans" (tax collectors) and "sinners" was considered scandalous for several reasons. Tax collectors were viewed as traitors who collaborated with the Roman occupiers and were notorious for extortion, making them morally corrupt and ritually unclean. "Sinners" were a broad category of people who openly disregarded religious laws or lived immoral lives. By eating with them, Jesus was seen as associating with and implicitly endorsing their "unclean" status and sinful lifestyles, thereby violating social norms and religious purity laws, which deeply offended the Pharisees who rigorously adhered to these distinctions. This act challenged their understanding of who was worthy of God's presence and fellowship, as highlighted by their criticism in Matthew 9:11.

Did Jesus condone the sins of those He ate with?

Answer: Absolutely not. Jesus' act of eating with publicans and sinners was not an endorsement of their sinful behavior, but rather an expression of His mission to bring them to repentance and healing. He clearly stated His purpose in Matthew 9:12-13, saying, "They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick... For I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." His presence among them was an act of grace and an invitation to transformation, not an affirmation of their sin. Just as a physician enters a sick person's home to heal them, Jesus entered the lives of sinners to offer spiritual healing and new life. His willingness to engage with them demonstrated God's profound love and desire for all to turn from sin and find forgiveness.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Matthew 9:10 is a powerful prefigurement of the very heart of Christ's redemptive mission. Jesus, the Son of God, did not come to call the already "righteous" but to seek and save the lost, the broken, and the marginalized. His willingness to recline at table with publicans and sinners is a tangible demonstration of His incarnational love, stepping into the defiled spaces of humanity to bring cleansing and reconciliation. He is the ultimate "physician" for sin-sick souls, as He declares in Matthew 9:12. This meal foreshadows the ultimate communion Jesus offers through His sacrifice on the cross, where He became sin for us, bridging the chasm between a holy God and sinful humanity (2 Corinthians 5:21). The fellowship extended in Matthew 9:10 culminates in the New Covenant, where through His blood, access to God's presence is granted to all who believe, regardless of their past (Hebrews 10:19-22). This scene anticipates the heavenly banquet where people from every tribe, tongue, and nation will gather with the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (Revelation 7:9-10). Jesus, by dining with outcasts, perfectly embodies the welcoming embrace of God, who desires that none should perish but that all should come to repentance and eternal life through Him (John 3:16-17).

Copy as

Commentary on Matthew 9 verses 9–13

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

In these verses we have an account of the grace and favour of Christ to poor publicans, particularly to Matthew. What he did to the bodies of people was to make way for a kind design upon their souls. Now observe here,

I. The call of Matthew, the penman of this gospel. Mark and Luke call him Levi; it was ordinary for the same person to have two names: perhaps Matthew was the name he was most known by as a publican, and, therefore, in his humility, he called himself by that name, rather than by the more honourable name of Levi. Some think Christ gave him the name of Matthew when he called him to be an apostle; as Simon, he surnamed Peter. Matthew signifies, the gift of God, Ministers are God's gifts to the church; their ministry, and their ability for it, are God's gifts to them. Now observe,

1.The posture that Christ's call found Matthew in. He was sitting at the receipt of custom, for he was a publican, Luk 5:27. He was a custom-house officer at the port of Capernaum, or an exciseman, or collector of the land-tax. Now, (1.) He was in his calling, as the rest of them whom Christ called, Mat 4:18. Note, As Satan chooses to come, with his temptations, to those that are idle, so Christ chooses to come, with his calls, to those that are employed. But, (2.) It was a calling of ill fame among serious people; because it was attended with so much corruption and temptation, and there were so few in that business that were honest men. Matthew himself owns what he was before his conversion, as does St. Paul (Ti1 1:13), that the grace of Christ in calling him might be the more magnified, and to show, that God has his remnant among all sorts of people. None can justify themselves in their unbelief, by their calling in the world; for there is no sinful calling, but some have been saved out of it, and no lawful calling, but some have been saved in it.

2.The preventing power of this call. We find not that Matthew looked after Christ, or had any inclination to follow him, though some of his kindred were already disciples of Christ, but Christ prevented him with the blessings of his goodness. He is found of those that seek him not. Christ spoke first; we have not chosen him, but he hath chosen us. He said, Follow me; and the same divine, almighty power accompanied this word to convert Matthew, which attended that word (Mat 9:6), Arise and walk, to cure the man sick of the palsy. Note, A saving change is wrought in the soul by Christ as the Author, and his word as the means. His gospel is the power of God unto salvation, Rom 1:16. The call was effectual, for he came at the call; he arose, and followed him immediately; neither denied, nor deferred his obedience. The power of divine grace soon answers and overcomes all objections. Neither his commission for his place, nor his gains by it, could detain him, when Christ called him. He conferred not with flesh and blood, Gal 1:15, Gal 1:16. He quitted his post, and his hopes of preferment in that way; and, though we find the disciples that were fishers occasionally fishing again afterwards, we never find Matthew at the receipt of custom again.

II. Christ's converse with publicans and sinners upon this occasion; Christ called Matthew, to introduce himself into an acquaintance with the people of that profession. Jesus sat at meat in the house, Mat 9:10. The other evangelists tell us, that Matthew made a great feast, which the poor fishermen, when they were called, were not able to do. But when he comes to speak of this himself, he neither tells us that it was his own house, nor that it was a feast, but only that he sat at meat in the house; preserving the remembrance of Christ's favours to the publicans, rather than of the respect he had paid to Christ. Note, It well becomes us to speak sparingly of our own good deeds.

Now observe, 1. When Matthew invited Christ, he invited his disciples to come along with him. Note, They that welcome Christ, must welcome all that are his, for his sake, and let them have a room in their hearts. 2. He invited many publicans and sinners to meet him. This was the chief thing Matthew aimed at in this treat, that he might have an opportunity of bringing his old associates acquainted with Christ. He knew by experience what the grace of Christ could do, and would not despair concerning them. Note, They who are effectually brought to Christ themselves, cannot but be desirous that others also may be brought to him, and ambitious of contributing something towards it. True grace will not contentedly eat its morsels alone, but will invite others. When by the conversion of Matthew the fraternity was broken, presently his house was filled with publicans, and surely some of them will follow him, as he followed Christ. Thus did Andrew and Philip, Joh 1:41, Joh 1:45; Joh 4:29. See Jdg 14:9.

III. The displeasure of the Pharisees at this, Mat 9:11. They cavilled at it; why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners? Here observe, 1. That Christ was quarrelled with. It was not the least of his sufferings, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself. None was more quarrelled with by men, than he that came to take up the great quarrel between God and man. Thus he denied himself the honour due to an incarnate Deity, which was to be justified in what he spake, and to have all he said readily subscribed to: for though he never spoke or did anything amiss, every thing he said and did was found fault with. Thus he taught us to expect and prepare for reproach, and to bear it patiently. 2. They that quarrelled with him were the Pharisees; a proud generation of men, conceited of themselves, and censorious of others; of the same temper with those in the prophet's time, who said, Stand by thyself, come not near me; I am holier than thou: they were very strict in avoiding sinners, but not in avoiding sin; none greater zealots than they for the form of godliness, nor greater enemies to the power of it. They were for keeping up the traditions of the elders to a nicety, and so propagating the same spirit that they were themselves governed by. 3. They brought their cavil, not to Christ himself; they had not the courage to face him with it, but to his disciples. The disciples were in the same company, but the quarrel is with the Master: for they would not have done it, if he had not; and they thought it worse in him who was a prophet, than in them; his dignity, they thought, should set him at a greater distance from such company than others. Being offended at the Master, they quarrel with the disciples. Note, It concerns Christians to be able to vindicate and justify Christ, and his doctrines and laws, and to be ready always to give an answer to those that ask them a reason of the hope that is in them, Pe1 3:15. While he is an Advocate for us in heaven, let us be advocates for him on earth, and make his reproach our own. 4. The complaint was his eating with publicans and sinners: to be intimate with wicked people is against the law of God (Psa 119:115; Psa 1:1); and perhaps by accusing Christ of this to his disciples, they hoped to tempt them from him, to put them out of conceit with him, and so to bring them over to themselves to be their disciples, who kept better company; for they compassed sea and land to make proselytes. To be intimate with publicans was against the tradition of the elders, and, therefore, they looked upon it as a heinous thing. They were angry with Christ for this, (1.) Because they wished ill to him, and sought occasion to misrepresent him. Note, It is an easy and very common thing to put the worst constructions upon the best words and actions. (2.) Because they wished no good to publicans and sinners, but envied Christ's favour to them, and were grieved to see them brought to repentance. Note, It may justly be suspected, that they have not the grace of God themselves, who grudge others a share in that grace, who are not pleased with it.

IV. The defence that Christ made for himself and his disciples, in justification of their converse with publicans and sinners. The disciples, it should seem, being yet weak, had to seek for an answer to the Pharisees' cavil, and, therefore, bring it to Christ, and he heard it (Mat 9:12), or perhaps overheard them whispering it to his disciples. Let him alone to vindicate himself and to plead his own cause, to answer for himself and for us too. Two things he urges in his defence,

1.The necessity and exigence of the case of the publicans, which called aloud for his help, and therefore justified him in conversing with them for their good. It was the extreme necessity of poor, lost sinners, that brought Christ from the pure regions above, to these impure ones; and the same was it, that brought him into this company which was thought impure. Now,

(1.)He proves the necessity of the case of the publicans: they that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick. The publicans are sick, and they need one to help and heal them, which the Pharisees think they do not. Note,

[1.]Sin is the sickness of the soul; sinners are spiritually sick. Original corruptions are the diseases of the soul, actual transgressions are its wounds, or the eruptions of the disease. It is deforming, weakening, disquieting, wasting, killing, but, blessed be God, not incurable. [2.] Jesus Christ is the great Physician of souls. His curing of bodily diseases signified this, that he arose with healing under his wings. He is a skilful, faithful, compassionate Physician, and it is his office and business to heal the sick. Wise and good men should be as physicians to all about them; Christ was so. Hunc affectum versus omnes habet sapiens, quem versus aegros suos medicus - A wise man cherishes towards all around him the feelings of a physician for his patient. Seneca De Const. [3.] Sin-sick souls have need of this Physician, for their disease is dangerous; nature will not help itself; no man can help us; such need have we of Christ, that we are undone, eternally undone, without him. Sensible sinners see their need, and apply themselves to him accordingly. [4.] There are multitudes who fancy themselves to be sound and whole, who think they have no need of Christ, but that they can shift for themselves well enough without him, as Laodicea, Rev 3:17. Thus the Pharisees desired not the knowledge of Christ's word and ways, not because they had no need of him, but because they thought they had none. See Joh 9:40, Joh 9:41.

(2.)He proves, that their necessity did sufficiently justify his conduct, in conversing familiarly with them, and that he ought not to be blamed for it; for that necessity made it an act of charity, which ought always to be preferred before the formalities of a religious profession, in which beneficence and munificence are far better than magnificence, as much as substance is better than shows or shadows. Those duties, which are of moral and natural obligation, are to take place even of those divine laws which are positive and ritual, much more of those impositions of men, and traditions of the elders, which make God's law stricter than he has made it. This he proves (Mat 9:13) by a passage quoted out of Hos 6:6, I will have mercy and not sacrifice. That morose separation from the society of publicans, which the Pharisees enjoined, was less than sacrifice; but Christ's conversing with them was more than an act of common mercy, and therefore to be preferred before it. If to do well ourselves is better than sacrifice, as Samuel shows (Sa1 15:22, Sa1 15:23), much more to do good to others. Christ's conversing with sinners is here called mercy: to promote the conversion of souls is the greatest act of mercy imaginable; it is saving a soul from death, Jam 5:20. Observe how Christ quotes this, Go ye and learn what that meaneth. Note, It is not enough to be acquainted with the letter of scripture, but we must learn to understand the meaning of it. And they have best learned the meaning of the scriptures, that have learned how to apply them as a reproof to their own faults, and a rule for their own practice. This scripture which Christ quoted, served not only to vindicate him, but, [1.] To show wherein true religion consists; not in external observances: not in meats and drinks and shows of sanctity, not in little particular opinions and doubtful disputations, but in doing all the good we can to the bodies and souls of others; in righteousness and peace; in visiting the fatherless and widows. [2.] To condemn the Pharisaical hypocrisy of those who place religion in rituals, more than in morals, Mat 23:23. They espouse those forms of godliness which may be made consistent with, and perhaps subservient to, their pride, covetousness, ambition, and malice, while they hate that power of it which is mortifying to those lusts.

2.He urges the nature and end of his own commission. He must keep to his orders, and prosecute that for which he was appointed to be the great Teacher; now, says he, "I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance, and therefore must converse with publicans." Observe, (1.) What his errand was; it was to call to repentance. This was his first text (Mat 4:17), and it was the tendency of all his sermons. Note, The gospel call is a call to repentance; a call to us to change our mind and to change our way. (2.) With whom his errand lay; not with the righteous, but with sinners. That is, [1.] If the children of men had not been sinners, there had been no occasion for Christ's coming among them. He is the Saviour, not of man as man, but of man as fallen. Had the first Adam continued in his original righteousness, we had not needed a second Adam. [2.] Therefore his greatest business lies with the greatest sinners; the more dangerous the sick man's case is, the more occasion there is for the physician's help. Christ came into the world to save sinners, but especially the chief (Ti1 1:15); to call not those so much, who, though sinners, are comparatively righteous, but the worst of sinners. [3.] The more sensible any sinners are of their sinfulness, the more welcome will Christ and his gospel be to them; and every one chooses to go where his company is desired, not to those who would rather have his room. Christ came not with an expectation of succeeding among the righteous, those who conceit themselves so, and therefore will sooner be sick of their Saviour, than sick of their sins, but among the convinced humble sinners; to them Christ will come, for to them he will be welcome.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–13. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
On Modesty
Nor would the name of publicans have been so execrable in the eyes of the Lord, unless as being a "strange" name,-a (name) of such as put up the pathways of the very sky, and earth, and sea, for sale. Moreover, when (the writer) adjoins "sinners" to "publicans," it does not follow that he shows them to have been Jews, albeit some may possibly have been so; but by placing on a par the one genus of heathens-some sinners by office, that is, publicans; some by nature, that is, not publicans-he has drawn a distinction between them.
Hilary of Poitiers (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 367
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
It is a very fearful thing to be seized by death while the sins are yet unforgiven by Christ; for there is no way to the heavenly house for him whose sins have not been forgiven. But when this fear is removed, honour is rendered to God, who by His word has in this way given power to men, of forgiveness of sins, of resurrection of the body, and of return to Heaven.

Christ came for all; how is it then that He says He came not for the righteous? Were there those for whom it needed not that He should come? But no man is righteous by the law. He shows how empty their boast of justification, sacrifices being inadequate to salvation, mercy was necessary for all who were set under the Law.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. xxx.) Having wrought this miracle, Christ would not abide in the same place, lest He should rouse the envy of the Jews. Let us also do thus, not obstinately opposing those who lay in wait for us. And as Jesus departed thence, (namely from the place in which He had done this miracle,) he saw a man sitting at the receipt of custom, Matthew by name.

Herein he shows the excellent power of Him that called him; while engaged in this dangerous office He rescued him from the midst of evil, as also Paul while he was yet mad against the Church. He saith unto him, Follow me. As you have seen the power of Him that calleth, so learn the obedience of him that is called; he neither refuses, nor requests to go home and inform his friends.

But why did He not call him at the same time with Peter and John and the others? Because he was then still in a hardened state, but after many miracles, and great fame of Christ, when He who knows the inmost secrets of the heart, perceived him more disposed to obedience, then He called him.

Why is it then that nothing is said of the rest of the Apostles how or when they were called, but only of Peter, Andrew, James, John, and Matthew? Because these were in the most alien and lowly stations, for nothing can be more disreputable than the office of Publican, nothing more abject than that of fisherman.

Matthew being honoured by the entrance of Jesus into his house, called together all that followed the same calling with himself; Behold many Publicans and sinners came and sat down with Jesus, and with his disciples.

Thus they came near to our Redeemer, and that not only to converse with Him, but to sit at meat with Him; for so not only by disputing, or healing, or convincing His enemies, but by eating with them, He oftentimes healed such as were ill-disposed, by this teaching us, that all times, and all actions, may be made means to our advantage. When the Pharisees saw this they were indignant; And the Pharisees beholding said to his disciples, Why eateth your Master with Publicans and sinners? It should be observed, that when the disciples seemed to be doing what was sinful, these same addressed Christ, Behold, thy disciples are doing what it is not allowed to do on the Sabbath. (Mat. 12:2.) Here they speak against Christ to His disciples, both being the part of malicious persons, seeking to detach the hearts of the disciple from the Master.

Having first spoken in accordance with common opinion, He now addresses them out of Scripture, saying, Go ye, and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy and not sacrifice.

As much as to say; How do you accuse me for reforming sinners? Therefore in this you accuse God the Father also. For as He wills the amendment of sinners, even so also do I. And He shows that this that they blamed was not only not forbidden, but was even by the Law set above sacrifice; for He said not, I will have mercy as well as sacrifice, but chooses the one and rejects the other.

Whence we may suppose that He is speaking ironically, as when it is said, Behold now Adam is become as one of us. (Gen. 3:22.) For that there is none righteous on earth Paul shows, All have sinned, and need glory of God. (Rom. 3:23.) By this saying He also consoled those who were called; as though He had said, So far am I from abhorring sinners, that for their sakes only did I come.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 30
Having therefore called him, He also honored him with a very great honor by partaking straightway of his table; for in this way He would both give him good hope for the future, and lead him on to a greater confidence. For not in a long time, but at once, He healed his vice. And not with him only doth He sit down to meat, but with many others also; although this very thing was accounted a charge against Him, that He chased not away the sinners. But neither do they conceal this point, what sort of blame is endeavored to be fixed on His proceedings.

Now the publicans come together as to one of the same trade; for he, exulting in the entrance of Christ, had called them all together. The fact is, Christ used to try every kind of treatment; and not when discoursing only, nor when healing, nor when reproving His enemies, but even at His morning meal, He would often correct such as were in a bad way; hereby teaching us, that every season and every work may by possibility afford us profit. And yet surely what was then set before them came of injustice and covetousness; but Christ refused not to partake of it, because the ensuing gain was to be great: yea rather He becomes partaker of the same roof and table with them that have committed such offenses. For such is the quality of a physician; unless he endure the corruption of the sick, he frees them not from their infirmity.

And yet undoubtedly He incurred hence an evil report: first by eating with him, then in Matthew's house, and thirdly, in company with many publicans. See at least how they reproach Him with this. "Behold a man gluttonous, and a wine-bibber, a friend of publicans and sinners."

Let them hear, as many as are striving to deck themselves with great honor for fasting, and let them consider that our Lord was called "a man gluttonous and a winebibber," and He was not ashamed, but overlooked all these things, that he might accomplish what He had set before him; which indeed was accordingly done. For the publican was actually converted, and thus became a better man.

And to teach thee that this great thing was wrought by his partaking of the table with Him, hear what Zacchaeus saith, another publican. I mean, when he heard Christ saying, "To-day, I must abide in thy house," the delight gave him wings, and he saith, "The half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold." And to him Jesus saith, "This day is salvation come to this house." So possible is it by all ways to give instruction.
Jerome (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 420
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
The other Evangelists from respect to Matthew have not called him by his common name, but say here, Levi, for he had both names. Matthew himself, according to that Solomon says. The righteous man accuses himself, (Prov. 18:17.) calls himself both Matthew and Publican, to show the readers that none need despair of salvation who turn to better things, seeing he from a Publican became an Apostle.

Porphyry and the Emperor Julian insist from this account, that either the historian is to be charged with falsehood, or those who so readily followed the Saviour with haste and temerity; as if He called any without reason. They forget also the signs and wonders which had preceded, and which no doubt the Apostles had seen before they believed. Yea the brightness of effulgence of the hidden Godhead which beamed from His human countenance might attract them at first view. For if the loadstone can, as it is said, attract iron, how much more can the Lord of all creation draw to Himself whom He will!

But they had seen the Publican turning from sins to better things, and finding place of repentance, and on this account they do not despair of salvation.

For they do not come to Jesus while they remain in their original condition of sin, as the Pharisees and Scribes complain, but in penitence, as what follows proves; But Jesus hearing said, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.

This text from Osee (Hosea 6:6.) is directed against the Scribes and Pharisees, who, deeming themselves righteous, refused to keep company with Publicans and sinners.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Matthew
(V. 10 seq.) And it came to pass, as he sat at table in his house, behold many publicans and sinners came and sat down with Jesus and his disciples. And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to his disciples, 'Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?' But when Jesus heard it, he said, 'Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. Go and learn what this means: "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice." For I came not to call the righteous, but sinners.''
Augustine of Hippo (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 430
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Matthew has not said in whose house Jesus sat at meat (on this occasion), from which we might suppose, that this was not told in its proper order, but that what took place at some other time is inserted here as it happened to come into his mind; did not Mark and Luke who relate the same show that it was in Levi's, that is, in Matthew's house.
Peter ChrysologusAD 450
SERMONS 29:4
Jesus’ sitting at table has more significance for Matthew than just dining. Jesus will be feasting not on food but on the return of sinners. He will call them back through feasting, collegiality and human affection, enjoying himself with their pleasant conversation while reclining at table. He knew that if they recognized him as a powerful judge they would be shattered by the terror of his majesty and overwhelmed by the sheer presence of God unveiled (nuda). Thus, veiled in a human body he was able to communicate with humans. He who wanted to assist the guilty hides the fact that he was a judge. He who did not deny dignity to faithful servants conceals his lordship. He who desired the weak to be embraced by a parent’s love covers his majesty.
Remigius of Rheims (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 533
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
He esteems lightly human dangers which might accrue to him from his masters for leaving his accounts in disorder, but, he arose, and followed him. And because he relinquished earthly gain, therefore of right was he made the dispenser of the Lord's talents.
Rabanus Maurus (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 856
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(e Beda.) They are here in a twofold error; first, they esteemed themselves righteous, though in their pride they had departed far from righteousness; secondly, they charged with unrighteousness those who by recovering themselves from sin were drawing near to righteousness.

He calls Himself a physician, because by a wonderful kind of medicine He was wounded for our iniquities that He might heal the wound of our sin. By the whole, He means those who seeking to establish their own righteousness have not submitted to the true righteousness of God. By the sick, (Rom. 10:3.) He means those who, tied by the consciousness of their frailty, and seeing that they are not justified by the Law, submit themselves in penitence to the grace of God.

He therefore warns them, that by deeds of mercy they should seek for themselves the rewards of the mercy that is above, and, not overlooking the necessities of the poor, trust to please God by offering sacrifice. Wherefore, He says, Go; that is, from the rashness of foolish fault-finding to a more careful meditation of Holy Scripture, which highly commends mercy, and proposes to them as a guide His own example of mercy, saying, I came not to call the righteous but sinners.

In the call of Matthew and the Publicans is figured the faith of the Gentiles who first gaped after the gain of the world, and are now spiritually refreshed by the Lord; in the pride of the Pharisees, the jealousy of the Jews at the salvation of the Gentiles. Or, Matthew signifies the man intent on temporal gain; Jesus sees him, when He looks on him with the eyes of mercy. For Matthew is interpreted 'given,' Levi 'taken,' the penitent is taken out of the mass of the perishing, and by God's grace given to the Church. And Jesus saith unto him, Follow me, either by preaching, or by the admonition of Scripture, or by internal illumination.
Glossa Ordinaria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(ap. Anselm.) He says, sitting at the receipt of custom, that is, in the place where the tolls were collected. He was named Telonarius, from a Greek word signifying taxes.

(non occ.) Matthew places his calling among the miracles; for a great miracle it was, a Publican becoming an Apostle.

(ap. Anselm.) As a meet return for the heavenly mercy, Matthew prepared a great feast for Christ in his house, bestowing his temporal goods on Him of whom he looked to receive everlasting goods. It follows, And it came to pass as he sat at meat in the house.

(ap. Anselm.) The Publicans were they who were engaged in public business, which seldom or never can be carried on without sin. And a beautiful omen of the future, that he that was to be an Apostle and doctor of the Gentiles, at his first conversion draws after him a great multitude of sinners to salvation, already performing by his example what he was shortly to perform by word.

(ord.) Tertullian says that these must have been Gentiles, because Scripture says, There shall be no payer of tribute in Israel, as if Matthew were not a Jew. But the Lord did not sit down to meat with Gentiles, being more especially careful not to break the Law, as also He gave commandment to His disciples below, Go not into the way of the Gentiles.

(ap. Anselm.) Yet does not God contemn sacrifice, but sacrifice without mercy. But the Pharisees often offered sacrifices in the temple that they might seem to men to be righteous, but did not practise the deeds of mercy by which true righteousness is proved.

(ap. Anselm.) Or; Those who were righteous, as Nathanael and John the Baptist, were not to be invited to repentance. Or. I came not to call the righteous, that is, the feignedly righteous, those who boasted of their righteousness as the Pharisees, but those that owned themselves sinners.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Matthew 9:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.