Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But ye have profaned it, in that ye say, The table of the LORD is polluted; and the fruit thereof, even his meat, is contemptible.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But ye have profaned H2490 it, in that ye say H559, The table H7979 of the LORD H3068 is polluted H1351; and the fruit H5108 thereof, even his meat H400, is contemptible H959.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"But you profane it by saying that the table of ADONAI is polluted, so that the fruit and food offered deserve contempt.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“But you profane it when you say, ‘The table of the Lord is defiled, and as for its fruit, its food is contemptible.’
Ask
American Standard Version
But ye profane it, in that ye say, The table of Jehovah is polluted, and the fruit thereof, even its food, is contemptible.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“But you profane it, in that you say, ‘The LORD’s table is polluted, and its fruit, even its food, is contemptible.’
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But ye haue polluted it, in that ye say, The table of the Lord is polluted and the fruit thereof, euen his meat is not to be regarded.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And ye are polluting it in your saying, `The table of Jehovah--it is polluted, As to its fruit--despicable is its food.'
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Malachi 1:12 delivers a scathing divine indictment against the priests and the people of post-exilic Judah, exposing their profound spiritual apathy and flagrant disrespect for God's holiness. The verse reveals that they not only offered substandard sacrifices but also verbally declared the sacred "table of the LORD"—representing the altar and the entire sacrificial system—to be "polluted" and its "meat" "contemptible," thereby profaning the very institutions God established for worship and communion. This statement encapsulates their deep-seated cynicism and irreverence, highlighting a severe disconnect between outward religious ritual and inward spiritual devotion.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Malachi 1:12 is situated within the opening section of the book (Malachi 1:6-2:9), where the Lord directly confronts the priests for their dishonorable conduct. Preceding this verse, God challenges their dismissive attitude ("Wherein have we despised thy name?" Malachi 1:6) and immediately provides evidence: they offer "polluted bread upon mine altar" (Malachi 1:7) and present blind, lame, and sick animals for sacrifice, which they themselves would not offer to a governor (Malachi 1:8). Verse 12 serves as a direct explanation of the heart attitude behind these actions, explicitly stating their contempt for the altar and its offerings. This accusation sets the stage for God's declaration of His greatness among the nations (Malachi 1:11, 14) and His subsequent judgment against the unfaithful priests (Malachi 2:1-9).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The prophet Malachi ministered to the Jewish community in Judah during the Persian period, likely in the mid-5th century BC, after the return from Babylonian exile. Though the Temple had been rebuilt (completed c. 516 BC), the initial fervor of restoration had waned. The people faced economic hardship and disillusionment, leading to spiritual complacency. The priests, who were meant to be guardians of God's law and examples of holiness, had become lax and corrupt, prioritizing personal gain over divine honor. The sacrificial system was central to Israelite worship and atonement, and the "table of the LORD" referred metaphorically to the altar where sacrifices were offered and where God communed with His people. To call it "polluted" or "contemptible" was not just a casual remark but a profound insult to God's presence and provision, reflecting a widespread spiritual decline and a failure to remember the covenant obligations established in the Law.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several key themes prevalent in Malachi. Firstly, it underscores the Profanation of Sacred Things, demonstrating how the priests and people treated holy institutions as common or defiled, a direct violation of God's command for reverence (e.g., Leviticus 10:3). Secondly, it highlights Contempt for God's Holiness and Provisions, as their words and actions revealed a disdain for the very means God provided for atonement and communion, thereby despising the Lord Himself. Thirdly, it exposes the pervasive Hypocrisy in Worship, where outward ritual was performed without inner devotion, a recurring prophetic critique (e.g., Isaiah 29:13). Finally, it emphasizes Divine Displeasure with insincere worship, signaling God's righteous anger and His unwavering demand for honor from His people, affirming His identity as a great King (Malachi 1:14) who will not be mocked.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Profaned (Hebrew, châlal', H2490): This word literally means "to bore" or "to wound," but figuratively it means "to profane," "to defile," or "to desecrate." It implies a violation of sacredness, treating something holy as common or unclean. Here, it denotes an active act of disrespect and a breaking of the covenant relationship by treating God's altar and worship as ordinary or worthless.
  • Polluted (Hebrew, gâʼal', H1351): This term means "to soil," "to defile," or "to desecrate." It is often used in a ritual sense to describe something that has become ritually unclean or contaminated. The priests' declaration that the "table of the LORD" is polluted indicates not only their perception of its defilement but also their role in causing that defilement through their unworthy offerings and attitudes.
  • Contemptible (Hebrew, bâzâh', H959): This word means "to disesteem," "to despise," "to disdain," or "to scorn." It powerfully conveys the inner attitude of the priests and people—a profound lack of honor and a dismissive attitude towards the offerings, and by extension, towards the God to whom they were offered. It reveals a heart condition of utter disregard for the sacred.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But ye have profaned it, in that ye say,": This opening clause directly accuses the priests (and by extension, the people) of actively desecrating God's sacred institutions. The profanation is not merely an act but stems from their spoken words, revealing their inner attitude. Their verbal declaration is the outward manifestation of their inward contempt.
  • "The table of the LORD [is] polluted;": This phrase identifies the object of their contempt: "the table of the LORD," a metaphorical reference to the altar where sacrifices were offered, symbolizing God's presence and the means of atonement and communion. Their assertion that it is "polluted" indicates their belief that it is defiled or unworthy, perhaps due to the poor offerings they bring, or more likely, their cynical view of the entire sacrificial system as burdensome and unholy.
  • "and the fruit thereof, [even] his meat, [is] contemptible.": This final clause specifies what is on the "table" – "the fruit thereof, even his meat," referring to the sacrificial offerings themselves. By calling these offerings "contemptible," they express their disdain not only for the physical sacrifices but also for the divine provision and the very act of worship. This reveals a deep-seated irreverence and a complete devaluation of God's prescribed means of approaching Him.

Literary Devices

Malachi 1:12 employs several potent literary devices to convey its message. Metaphor is central, with "the table of the LORD" serving as a powerful image for the altar and the entire sacrificial system, representing the sacred space where God meets with His people. The priests' words are laden with Irony, as those entrusted with maintaining the holiness of God's house are precisely the ones who declare it "polluted" and its offerings "contemptible." This highlights the shocking inversion of their priestly duty. The use of strong, emotionally charged words like "profaned," "polluted," and "contemptible" demonstrates Emotive Language, designed to evoke a sense of outrage and divine displeasure at the people's irreverence. Furthermore, the direct accusation, "But ye have profaned it, in that ye say," is a form of Direct Address, making the indictment personal and inescapable for the priests.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Malachi 1:12 profoundly underscores the critical importance of sincere and reverent worship in the eyes of God. The priests' actions and words reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of God's holiness and His covenant relationship with Israel. They treated the sacred as common, reducing acts of worship to burdensome rituals rather than joyful expressions of devotion and gratitude. This spiritual apathy not only dishonored God but also broke the very covenant that sustained their identity as His people. God demands not just outward conformity but inward transformation and a heart that truly reveres His name and His provisions for salvation and communion. Their contempt for the "table of the LORD" was, in essence, contempt for the Lord Himself.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Malachi 1:12 serves as a timeless mirror, reflecting the dangers of spiritual apathy and irreverence in our approach to God. For believers today, the "table of the LORD" can be understood broadly as any context where we encounter God's presence, His Word, prayer, fellowship, or corporate worship. We can "profane" this sacred space not by offering blemished animals, but by bringing a blemished heart—one filled with cynicism, distraction, or a sense of obligation rather than joyful devotion. When we approach worship casually, offer God our "leftovers" (whether in time, talent, or resources), or complain about spiritual duties, we risk echoing the very contempt that Malachi condemned. This verse challenges us to examine our attitudes, ensuring that our worship—both private and corporate—is marked by genuine reverence, gratitude, and a recognition of God's absolute holiness and worthiness of our very best. It calls us to cultivate a heart that truly values God's presence and His provisions, transforming our spiritual duties into privileges.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I, like the priests in Malachi's day, be approaching God's presence or spiritual disciplines with a sense of obligation or contempt rather than reverence?
  • What does my attitude towards corporate worship, personal prayer, or Bible study reveal about my true estimation of God's "table" in my life?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper sense of gratitude and honor for God's provisions and His call to worship, ensuring my heart matches my outward actions?
  • Are there areas in my life where I am offering God "contemptible meat" – less than my best – and what practical steps can I take to offer Him my wholehearted devotion?

FAQ

What does "the table of the LORD" refer to in Malachi 1:12?

Answer: In Malachi 1:12, "the table of the LORD" is a metaphorical expression that primarily refers to the altar in the Temple where sacrifices were offered to God. It symbolizes the sacred space of communion and atonement, where God met with His people through the sacrificial system. By extension, it encompasses the entire system of worship and the offerings themselves, which the priests and people were treating with disdain. This phrase emphasizes the personal and relational aspect of God's provision for worship, which they had profaned.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Malachi 1:12, with its stark indictment of profaned worship and contemptible offerings, finds its ultimate fulfillment and profound reversal in Jesus Christ. The "table of the LORD" in the Old Testament, representing the altar and the sacrificial system, pointed forward to the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice of Christ. The priests' blemished offerings and their declaration that the "meat" was "contemptible" highlighted humanity's inability to truly honor God through their own efforts. However, Jesus Christ, the spotless Lamb of God, offered Himself as the perfect, unblemished sacrifice, forever sanctifying those who believe (Hebrews 10:10). His body and blood, offered on the cross, became the true and acceptable "meat" that takes away the sin of the world, making our access to God's presence possible. Through Him, we are called to offer "spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ" (1 Peter 2:5), no longer with contempt or apathy, but with hearts transformed by His grace. Our worship now is not about defiled offerings on a physical table, but about presenting our very lives as a "living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God" (Romans 12:1), made possible by the perfect offering of our Lord at His table.

Copy as

Commentary on Malachi 1 verses 6–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet is here, by a special commission, calling the priests to account, though they were themselves appointed judges, to call the people to an account. Let the rulers in the house of God know that there is one above them, who will reckon with them for their mal-administrations. Thus saith the Lord of hosts to you, O priests! Mal 1:6. God will have a saying to unfaithful ministers; and it concerns those who speak from God to his people to hear and heed what he says to them, that they may save themselves in the first place, otherwise how should they help to save those that hear them? It is a severe, and no doubt a just reproof, that is here given to the priests, for the profanation of the holy things of God, with which they were entrusted; and, if this was the crime of the priests, we have reason to fear the people also were guilty of it: so that what is said to the priests is said to all, nay, it is said to us, who, as Christians, profess ourselves, not only the people of God, but priests to him. Observe here,

I. What it was that God expected from them, and with what good reason he expected it (Mal 1:6): A son honours his father, because he is his father; nature has written this law in the hearts of children, before God wrote it at Mount Sinai; nay, a servant, though his obligation to his master is not natural, but by voluntary compact, yet thinks it his duty to honour him, to be observant of his orders, and true to his interests. Children and servants pay respect to their parents and masters; every one cries out shame on them if they do not, and their own hearts cannot but reproach them too; the order of families is thus kept up, and it is their beauty and advantage. But the priests, who are God's children and his servants, do not fear and honour him. They were fathers and masters to the people, and expected to be called so (Jdg 18:19, Mat 22:7, Mat 22:10) and to be reverenced and obeyed as such; but they forgot their Father and Master in heaven, and the duty they owed to him. We may each of us charge upon ourselves what is here charged upon the priests. Note, 1. We are every one of us to look upon God as our Father and Master, and upon ourselves as his children and servants. 2. Our relation to God as our Father and Master strongly obliges us to fear and honour him. If we honour and fear the fathers of our flesh, much more the Father and Master of our spirits, Heb 12:9. 3. It is a thing to be justly complained of, and lamented, that God is so little feared and honoured even by those that own him for their Father and Master. Where is his honour? Where is his fear?

II. What the contempt was which the priests put upon God.

1.This is that, in general, which is charged upon them: - (1.) They despised God's name; their familiarity with it, as priests, bred contempt of it, and served them only to gain a veneration by it for themselves and their own name, while God's name was of small account with them. God's name is all that whereby he has made himself known - his word and ordinances; these they had low thoughts of, and vilified that which it was their business to magnify; and no wonder that when they despised it themselves they did that which made it despicable to others, causing even the sacrifices of the Lord to be abhorred, as Eli's sons did. (2.) They profaned God's name, Mal 1:12. They polluted it, Mal 1:7. They not only made no account of sacred things, but they made an ill use of them, and perverted them to the service of the worst and vilest purposes - their own pride, covetousness, and luxury. There cannot be a greater provocation to God than the profanation of his name; for it is holy and reverend. His purity cannot be polluted by us, for he is unspotted, but his name may be profaned; and nothing profanes it more than the misconduct of priests, whose business it is to do honour to it. This is the general charge exhibited against them. To this they plead Not guilty, and challenge God to prove it upon them, and to make good the charge, which added daring impudence to their daring impiety: You say, Wherein have we despised thy name? (Mal 1:6), and wherein have we polluted thee? Mal 1:7. It is common with proud sinners, when they are reproved, to stand thus upon their own justification. These priests had most horridly profaned sacred things, and yet, like the adulterous woman, they said that they had done no wickedness; they were so inobservant of themselves that they remembered not or reflected not upon their own acts, or they were so ignorant of the divine law that they thought there was no harm in them, and that what they did could not be construed into despising God's name, or they were so atheistical as to imagine that though they knew their own guilt yet God did not, or they were so scornful in their conduct towards God and his prophets that they took a pride in bantering a serious and just reproof, and turning it off with a jest. They either laugh at the reproof, as those that despise it, and harden their hearts against it, or they laugh it off, as those that resolve they will not be touched by it, or will not seem to be so. Which way soever we take it, their defence was their offence, and, in justifying themselves, their own tongues condemned them, and their saying, Wherein have we despised thy name? proved them proud and perverse. Had they asked this question with a humble desire to be told more particularly wherein they had offended, it would have been an evidence of their repentance, and would have given hopes of their reformation; but to ask it thus in disdain and defiance of the word of God argues their hearts fully set in them to do evil. Note, Sinners ruin themselves by studying to baffle their own convictions; but they will find it hard to kick against the pricks.

2.Justly might they have been convicted and condemned upon the general charge, and their plea thrown out as frivolous; but God will not only overcome, but will be clear, will be justified when he judges, and therefore he shows them very particularly wherein they had despised his name, and what the contempt was that they cast upon him. As formerly, when he charged them with idolatry, so now, when he charges them with profaneness, he bids them see their way in the valley and know what they have done, Jer 2:23.

(1.)They despised God's name in what they said, in the low opinion they had of his institutions: "You say in your hearts, and perhaps speak it out when you priests get together over your cups. out of the hearing of the people, The table of the Lord is contemptible" (Mal 1:7), and again (Mal 1:12), "You say, The table of the Lord is polluted; it is to be no more regarded than any other table." Either the table in the temple, on which the show-bread was placed, is that which they reflect upon (not understanding the mystery of it, they despised it as an insignificant thing), or rather the altar of burnt-offerings is here called the table, for there God, and his priests, and his people, did, as it were, feast together upon the sacrifices, in token of friendship. This they thought was contemptible. Formerly, in the days of superstition, it was thought contemptible in comparison with the idolatrous alters that the heathen had, and was set aside to make room for a new-fashioned one (Kg2 16:14, Kg2 16:15); now it is thought contemptible in comparison with their own tables, and those of their great men: The fruit thereof, even his meat, is contemptible. Those who served at the altar were to live upon the altar; but they complained that they lived poorly and meanly, and that it was not worth while to attend the service of the altar for the fruit and meat of it, for it was very ordinary and always the same again; they had no dainties, no varieties, no nice dishes. Nay, that part of the sacrifices which was given to God, the blood and the fat, they looked upon with contempt, as not worthy the multitude of laws God had made about it; they asked, "What need is there of so much ado about burning the fat and pouring out the blood?" Note, Those greatly profane and pollute God's name who despise the business of religion, though it is very honourable, as not worth taking pains in, and the advantages of religion, though highly valuable, as not worth taking pains for. Those who live in a careless neglect of holy ordinances, who come to them and attend on them irreverently, and go away from them never the better and under no concern, do in effect say, "The table of the Lord is contemptible; there is neither virtue nor value in it, neither credit nor comfort from it."

(2.)They despised God's name in what they did, which was of a piece with what they said, and flowed from it; corrupt principles and notions are roots of bitterness, which bear the gall and wormwood of corrupt practices. They looked upon the table and altar of the Lord as contemptible, and then, [1.] They thought any thing would serve for a sacrifice, though ever so coarse and mean, and were so far from bringing the best, as they ought to have done, that they picked out the worst they had, which was fit neither for the market nor for their own tables, and offered that at God's altar. With every sacrifice they were to bring a meat-offering of fine flour mingled with oil; but they brought polluted bread (Mal 1:7), coarse bread, servants' bread, perhaps it was dry and mouldy, or made of the refuse of the wheat, which they thought good enough to be burnt upon the altar; for had it been better they would have said, To what purpose is this waste? And as to the beasts they offered, though the law was express that what was offered in sacrifice should not have a blemish, yet they brought the blind, and the lame, and the sick (Mal 1:8), and again (Mal 1:13), the torn, and the lame, and the sick, that was ready to die of itself. They looked no further than the burning of the sacrifice, and they pleaded that it was a pity to burn it if it was good for any thing else. The people were so far convinced of their duty that they would bring sacrifices; they durst not wholly omit the duty, but they brought vain oblations, mocked God, and deceived themselves, by bringing the worst they had; and the priests, who should have taught them better, accepted the gifts brought to the altar and offered them up there, because, if they should refuse them, the people would bring none at all, and then they would lose their perquisites; and therefore, having more regard to their own profit than to God's honour, they accepted that which they knew he would not accept. Some make Mal 1:8 to be a continuation of what the priests profanely said Mal 1:7, You say to the people, If you offer the blind for sacrifice, it is not evil; or the lame and the sick, it is not evil. Note, It is a very evil thing, whether men think so or no, to offer the blind and the lame, the torn and the sick, in sacrifice to God. If we worship God ignorantly, and without understanding, we bring the blind for sacrifice; if we do it carelessly, and without consideration, if we are cold, and dull, and dead, in it, we bring the sick; if we rest in the bodily exercise, and do not make heart-work of it, we bring the lame; and, if we suffer vain thoughts and distractions to lodge within us, we bring the torn. And is not this evil? Is it not a great affront to God and a great wrong and injury to our own souls? Do not our books tell us, nay, do not our own hearts tell us, that this is evil? for God, who is the best, ought to be served with the best we have. [2.] They would do no more of their work than what they were paid for. The priests would offer the sacrifices that were brought to the altar, because they had their share of them; but as for any other service of the temple, that had not a particular fee belonging to it, they would not stir a step, nor lend a hand, to it; and this was the general temper of them, Mal 1:10. There is not a man among the priests that would shut the doors, or kindle a fire, for nought. If he were required to do the smallest piece of service, he would ask, how shall I be paid for it? They would do nothing gratis, but were all for what they could get, every one for his gain, from his quarter, Isa 56:11. Note, Though God has given order that his servants be well paid in this world, yet those are no acceptable servants to him who are mercenary, and would never do the work but for the wages. [3.] Their work was a perfect drudgery to them (Mal 1:13): You said also, Behold, what a weariness is it! Both priests and people were of this mind, that they thought God imposed too hard a task upon them; the people grudged the charge of providing the sacrifice and the priests grudged the pains of offering it; they thought the feasts of the Lord came too thick, and they were forced to attend too often, and too long, in the courts of the Lord; the priests thought it a severe penance imposed upon them to purify themselves as was required when they attended the altar and ate of the holy things; they thought the duty of their office toilsome and troublesome, and snuffed at it as unreasonable, and bearing hard upon them; they did it, but it was grudgingly and with reluctance. God speaks of it, in justification of his law, that he had not made them to serve with an offering, nor wearied them with incense, Isa 43:23. Wherein have I wearied thee? Mic 6:3. But their own wicked hearts made it a weariness; and they were, as Doeg, detained before the Lord; they would rather have been any where else. Note, Those are highly injurious, both to God and themselves, who are weary of his service and worship, and snuff at it.

III. Observe how God expostulates and reasons the case with them, for their conviction and humiliation. 1. Would they, durst they, affront an earthly prince thus? "You offer to God the lame and the sick; offer it now unto thy governor (Mal 1:8), either as tribute or as a present, when thou art entreating his favour, or in gratitude for some favour received; will he be pleased with thee? Or, rather, will he not take himself to be affronted by it?" Note, Those who are careless and irreverent in the duties of religious worship should consider what a shame it is to offer that to their God which they would scorn to offer to their governor, to be more observant of the laws of breeding and good manners than of the laws of religion, and more afraid of being rude than of being profane. 2. Could they imagine that such sacrifices as these would be pleasing to God, or answer the end of sacrifices? "Should I accept this at your hand, saith the Lord? Mal 1:13. Have you any reason to think I should either not discern or not resent the affront, that I should connive at the violation of my own laws? No (Mal 1:10); I have no pleasure in you, and therefore, I will not accept an offering, such an offering, at your hand." If God has no pleasure in the person, if the person be not in a justified state, if he be not sanctified, God will not accept the offering. God had respect to Abel first and then to his sacrifice. Note, In order to our acceptance with God it is not enough to do that which, for the matter of it, is good, but we must do it from a right principle, in a right manner, and for a right end. It was the ancient rule laid down (Gen 4:7), If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? Now, if we be not accepted of God, in vain do we worship him; it is all lost labour; nay, we are all undone, for ever undone, if we come short of God's acceptance. Those therefore make a bad bargain for themselves who, to save charges in their religion, miss all the ends of it, and, by thinking to go the nearest way to work, bring nothing to pass. Those who make it the top of their ambition, as we all ought to do, whether present or absent, to be accepted of the Lord, will not dare to bring the torn, and the lame, and the sick, for sacrifice. 3. How could they expect to prevail with God in their intercessions for the people when they thus affronted God in their sacrifices? So some understand Mal 1:9, as spoken ironically, "And now if you will do the duty of priests, and stand in the gap to turn away the judgments of God that you see ready to pour in upon us, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us, and to our land which is almost eaten up with locusts and caterpillars," as appears Mal 3:11. "Try now what interest you have at the throne of grace; improve it for the removing of this plague, for it has been by your means; you have provoked God to send it. But as you go on thus to profane his sacred things will he regard your persons or your prayers? No, you cannot prevail with him to command it away." For, if we regard iniquity in our hearts, God will not hear us, either for ourselves or for others. 4. Had God deserved this at their hands? No, he had provided comfortably for them, and had given them such encouragement in their work as might have engaged them to do it cheerfully and well; so some understand Mal 1:10, "Who is there among you that shall shut a door, or kindle a fire, for nought? No, God does not expect you should serve him for nothing; you are well paid for it, and shall be so; not a cup of cold water, given for the honour of God, shall lose its reward." Note, The consideration of our constant receivings from God, and the present rewards of obedience in obedience, very much aggravates our slothfulness and niggardliness in our returns of duty to God.

IV. He calls them to repentance for their profanations of his holy name. So we may understand Mal 1:9, "Now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us. Humble yourselves for your sin, cry mightily to God for pardon, and make up in the faith and fervency of your prayers what has been wanting in the worth and value of your sacrifices; for all the rebukes of Providence we are under are by your means." Note, Those who have by their sins helped to kindle a fire are highly concerned by their repentance, prayers, and the personal reformation, to help to quench it. We must see how much God's judgments are by our means, and be awakened thereby to be earnest with him to return in mercy; and, if we take not this course, how can we think he should regard our persons?

V. He declares his resolution both to secure the glory of his own name and to reckon with those who profane it. Those who put contempt upon God and religion, and think to run down sacred things, let them know,

1.That they shall not gain their point. God will magnify his law and make it honourable, though they vilify it and make it contemptible; for (Mal 1:11) from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles. It might be said, "If these are not the worshippers whom God will accept, then he has no worshippers." As if he must make the best of their service, or else he would have no service done him; and then what will he do for his great name? But let him alone for that; though Israel be not faithful, be not gathered, yet God will be glorious. Though these priests provoke him to take down the ceremonial economy, and to abolish that law of commandments, which could not make the comers thereunto perfect, yet he will be no loser by that, at the long run; for, (1.) Instead of those carnal ordinances, which they profaned, a spiritual way of worship shall be introduced and established: Incense shall be offered to God's name (which signifies prayer and praise, Psa 141:2; Rev 8:3), instead of the blood and fat of bulls and goats. And it shall be a pure offering, refined, not only from the corruptions that were in the priests' practice, but from the mere bodily exercise that was in the institutions themselves, which are called carnal ordinances, imposed till the time of reformation, Heb 9:10. When the hour came in which the true worshippers worshipped the Father in spirit and in truth, then this incense was offered, even this pure offering. (2.) Instead of his being worshipped and served among the Jews only, a small people in a corner of the world, he will be served and worshipped in all places, from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same; in every place, in every part of the world, incense shall be offered to his name; nations shall be discipled, and shall speak of the wonderful works of God, and have them spoken to them in their own language. This is a plain prediction of that great revolution in the kingdom of grace by which the Gentiles, who had been strangers and foreigners, came to be fellow-citizens with the saints and of the household of God, and as welcome to the throne of grace as ever the Jews had been. It is twice said (for the thing was certain), My name shall be great among the Gentiles, whereas hitherto in Judah only he was known, and his name was great, Psa 76:1. God's name shall be declared to them, the declaration of it shall be received and believed, and there shall be those among the Gentiles who shall magnify and glorify the name of God better than ever the Jews had done, even the priests themselves.

2.That they shall not go unpunished, Mal 1:14. Here is the doom of those who do like these priests, for the sentence on them is a sentence on all such. Observe, (1.) The description of profane and careless worshippers. They are such as vow and sacrifice to the Lord a corrupt thing when they have in their flock a male. They have of the best, wherewith to serve and honour him, so bountiful has be been in his gifts to them, but they put him off with the worst, and think that good enough for him, so ungrateful are they in their returns to him. This was the fault of the people, but the priests connived at it, and indulged them in it. We find a distinction in the law which allowed that to be offered for a free-will offering which would not be accepted for a vow, Lev 22:23. But the priests would accept it, though God would not, pretending to be more indulgent than he was, for which he will give them no thanks another day. (2.) The character given of such worshippers. They are deceivers; they deal falsely and fraudulently with God; they play the hypocrite with him; they pretend to honour him, in making the vow, but, when it comes to be performed, they put an affront upon him, to such a degree that it would have been better not to have vowed than to vow and thus to pay; but let not such be themselves deceived, for God is not mocked. Those who think to put a cheat upon God will prove, in the end, to have put a damning cheat upon their own souls. Hypocrites are deceivers, and they will prove self-deceivers, and so self-destroyers. (3.) The doom passed upon them: They are cursed; they expect a blessing, but will meet with a curse, the tokens of God's wrath, according to the judgment written. (4.) The reason of this doom: "For I am a great King, saith the Lord of hosts, and therefore will reckon with those who deal with me but as a man like themselves; my name is dreadful among the heathen, and therefore I will not bear that it should be contemptible among my own people." The heathen paid more respect to their gods, though idols, than the Jews did to theirs, though the only true and living God. Note, The consideration of God's universal dominion, and the universal acknowledgment of it, should restrain us from all irreverence in his service.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–14. Public domain.
Copy as
DidacheAD 100
The Didache, Chapter 14
But every Lord's day do ye gather yourselves together, and break bread, and give thanksgiving after having confessed your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure. But let no one that is at variance with his fellow come together with you, until they be reconciled, that your sacrifice may not be profaned. For this is that which was spoken by the Lord: In every place and time offer to me a pure sacrifice; for I am a great King, saith the Lord, and my name is wonderful among the nations.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Malachi
(Verse 10 seqq.) I have no pleasure in you, says the Lord of hosts, and I will not accept an offering from your hand. For from the rising of the sun to its setting my name will be great among the nations, and in every place incense will be offered to my name, and a pure offering. For my name will be great among the nations, says the Lord of hosts. But you profane it when you say: 'The table of the Lord is polluted, and its fruit, its food, is despised.' And you have said: 'Behold, we have labored and blown it away', says the Lord of hosts. And you have brought in the lame, and the sick, and you have brought in an offering: will I accept it from your hand? says the Lord. LXX: It is not my will in you, says the Lord Almighty, and I will not accept a sacrifice from your hands, for from the rising of the sun to its setting my glorious name is among the nations, and in every place incense is offered to my name, and a pure sacrifice, for great is my name among the nations, says the Lord Almighty. But you have defiled it by saying, 'The table of the Lord is polluted, and its fruit, its food, is despised.' You also say, 'These things are from affliction,' and you scoff at them,' says the Lord Almighty. You bring stolen goods, lame or sick animals, and offer them as sacrifices. Should I accept them from your hands?' says the Lord Almighty. The rule of Scriptures is this: When a clear prophecy about the future is given, do not diminish what is written by uncertain allegories. So now, specifically, the Lord's message is addressed to the priests of the Jews, who offer the blind and the lame and the sick for sacrifice, so that they may know that spiritual victims will succeed the carnal victims. And not the blood of bulls and goats, but incense, that is, the prayers of the saints, are to be offered to the Lord, not in one province of the world, Judea, nor in one city of Judea, Jerusalem, but in every place, an offering is to be made, not unclean, like the people of Israel, but clean, like in the ceremonies of the Christians. For from the rising of the sun even to its setting, the name of the Lord is great among the Gentiles, as the Savior says: Father, I have manifested your name to men (John 17:6). And when, he says, my name shall become great among the Gentiles, oh you princes of the Jews, you have defiled it and continue to defile it. Thus, the prophecy covers both the future and the present time. But therefore, oh priests and princes of the Jews, in every place a clean offering is presented to me, and my name is great among the Gentiles, because you say the Lord's table is defiled, and what is placed on it is contemptible with the fire that devours it. The people, upon returning from Babylon, built an altar made only of random and unpolished stones, according to the book of Ezra (Ezra 1:6), without a temple, without city buildings, without the construction of walls, and they believed that the worship of the religion was of lesser value because it lacked the adornments of the temple. To them, the Lord says: Do you think that the altar and the burnt offerings and the sacrifices placed on it are polluted? Do you also think that the fire, which consumes the sacrifices, is polluted? You do not understand that the almighty God does not seek gold, gems, or a multitude of sacrifices, but rather the will of those who offer. 953. But those who think that the altar should be understood as the table on which the loaves were placed, how can they interpret what follows, when I do not see at all the fire that devours it: for the fire does not devour the loaves of the offering, which were always exchanged for new ones instead of the old ones, and taken away to be used by the priests (Leviticus 2:4). Or certainly it should be understood in this way: You have defiled my name by saying: What good is it if we offer the best? Whatever is offered must be consumed by fire. But the fruit of the altar is fire, and the food of fire is the offerings of the host or the holocaust. And it is not enough that you spoke blasphemy in the previous discourse, but you also said this: 'Behold, we have labored and blown away what we had, says the Lord of hosts.' The meaning of this statement is as follows: You said, 'We have returned from captivity, we have been plundered by our enemies, we have labored greatly on a long journey, we are poor, whatever we could have, has been consumed by the hardships of the road. Whatever we have, we offer.' And by saying this, you have blown away your own sacrifices, that is, you have made them unworthy by my exhalation. Or as it can be read in Hebrew: 'And you have blown me away by saying this.' You have done injury not to the sacrifice, but to me, to whom you were sacrificing. Therefore, I will by no means accept that from your hand, says the almighty Lord. Some think that this is specifically said to the Jews because their offerings are unclean and polluted, and sacrifice is transferred to the Gentiles. It should be understood as pertaining to the priests of the Church who offer sacrifices to the Lord negligently. But if we accept this, then the offerings must be transferred again from the Church to another religion. And just as I read the Gospel, so again what is not yet future will happen in accordance with the Gospel. They also refer to the contaminated table of the Lord in holy Scriptures, if they are understood differently than they are written.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Malachi 1:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.