TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Judges 1 verses 21–36
We are here told upon what terms the rest of the tribes stood with the Canaanites that remained.
I. Benjamin neglected to drive the Jebusites out of that part of the city of Jerusalem which fell to their lot, Jdg 1:21. Judah had set them a good example, and gained them great advantages by what they did (Jdg 1:9), but they did not follow the blow for want of resolution.
II. The house of Joseph,
1.Bestirred themselves a little to get possession of Beth-el, Jdg 1:22. That city is mentioned in the tribe of Benjamin, Jos 18:22. Yet it is spoken of there (Jdg 1:13) as a city in the borders of that tribe, and, it should seem, the line went through it, so that one half of it only belonged to Benjamin, the other half to Ephraim; and perhaps the activity of the Ephraimites at this time, to recover it from the Canaanites, secured it entirely to them henceforward, or at least the greatest part of it, for afterwards we find it so much under the power of the ten tribes (and Benjamin was none of them) that Jeroboam set up one of his calves in it. In this account of the expedition of the Ephraimites against Beth-el observe,
(1.)Their interest in the divine favour: The Lord was with them, and would have been with the other tribes if they would have exerted their strength. The Chaldee reads it here, as in many other places, The Word of the Lord was their helper, namely, Christ himself, the captain of the Lord's host, now that they acted separately, as well as when they were all in one body.
(2.)The prudent measures they took to gain the city. They sent spies to observe what part of the city was weakest, or which way they might make their attack with most advantage, Jdg 1:23. These spies got very good information from a man they providentially met with, who showed them a private way into the town, which was left unguarded because, being not generally known, no danger was suspected on that side. And here, [1.] He is not to be blamed for giving them this intelligence if he did it from a conviction that the Lord was with them, and that by his donation the land was theirs of right, any more than Rahab was for entertaining those whom she knew to be enemies of her country, but friends of God. Nor, [2.] Are those to be blamed who showed him mercy, gave him and his family not only their lives, but liberty to go wherever they pleased: for one good turn requires another. But, it seems, he would not join himself to the people of Israel, he feared them rather than loved them, and therefore he removed after a colony of the Hittites, which, it should seem, had gone into Arabia and settled there upon Joshua's invasion of the country; with them this man chose to dwell, and among them he built a city, a small one, we may suppose, such as planters commonly build, and in the name of it preserved the ancient name of his native city, Luz, an almond-tree, preferring this before its new name, which carried religion in it, Bethel - the house of God.
(3.)Their success. The spies brought or sent notice of the intelligence they had gained to the army, which improved their advantages, surprised the city, and put them all to the sword, v. 25. But,
2.Besides this achievement, it seems, the children of Joseph did nothing remarkable (1.) Manasseh failed to drive out the Canaanites from several very considerable cities in their lot, and did not make any attempt upon them, Jdg 1:27. But the Canaanites, being in possession, were resolved not to quit it; they would dwell in that land, and Manasseh had not resolution enough to offer to dispossess them; as if there was no meddling with them unless they were willing to resign, which it was not to be expected they ever would be. Only as Israel got strength they got ground, and served themselves, both by their contributions and by their personal services, Jdg 1:28, Jdg 1:35. (2.) Ephraim likewise, though a powerful tribe, neglected Gezer a considerable city, and suffered the Canaanites to dwell among them (Jdg 1:29), which, some think, intimates their allowing them a quiet settlement, and indulging them with the privileges of an unconquered people, not so much as making them tributaries.
III. Zebulun, perhaps inclining to the sea-trade, for it was foretold that it should be a haven for ships, neglected to reduce Kitron and Nahalol (Jdg 1:30), and only made the inhabitants of those places tributaries to them.
IV. Asher quitted itself worse than any of the tribes (Jdg 1:31, Jdg 1:32), not only in leaving more towns than any of them in the hands of the Canaanites, but in submitting to the Canaanites instead of making them tributaries; for so the manner of expression intimates, that the Asherites dwelt among the Canaanites, as if the Canaanites were the more numerous and the more powerful, would still be lords of the country, and the Israelites must be only upon sufferance among them.
V. Naphtali also permitted the Canaanites to live among them (Jdg 1:33), only by degrees they got them so far under as to exact contributions from them.
VI. Dan was so far from extending his conquests where his lot lay that, wanting spirit to make head against the Amorites, he was forced by them to retire into the mountains and inhabit the cities there, but durst not venture into the valley, where, it is probable, the chariots of iron were, Jdg 1:34. Nay, and some of the cities in the mountains were kept against them, Jdg 1:35. Thus were they straitened in their possessions, and forced to seek for more room at Laish, a great way off, Jdg 18:1, etc. In Jacob's blessing Judah is compared to a lion, Dan to a serpent; now observe how Judah with his lion-like courage prospered and prevailed, but Dan with all his serpenting subtlety could get no ground; craft and artful management do not always effect the wonders they pretend to. What Dan came short of doing, it seems, his neighbours the Ephraimites in part did for him; they put the Amorites under tribute, Jdg 1:35.
Upon the whole matter it appears that the people of Israel were generally very careless both of their duty and interest in this thing; they did not what they might have done to expel the Canaanites and make room for themselves. And, 1. It was owing to their slothfulness and cowardice. They would not be at the pains to complete their conquests; like the sluggard, that dreamed of a lion in the way, a lion in the streets, they fancied insuperable difficulties, and frightened themselves with winds and clouds from sowing and reaping. 2. It was owing to their covetousness; the Canaanites' labour and money would do them more good (they thought) than their blood, and therefore they were willing to let them live among them, that they might make a hand of them. 3. They had not that dread and detestation of idolatry which they ought to have had; they thought it a pity to put these Canaanites to the sword, though the measure of their iniquity was full, thought it would be no harm to let them live among them, and that they should be in no danger from them. 4. The same thing that kept their fathers forty years out of Canaan kept them now out of the full possession of it, and that was unbelief. Distrust of the power and promise of God lost them their advantages, and ran them into a thousand mischiefs.
Continue studying Judges 1:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Judges 1:23 chronicles a strategic reconnaissance mission by the "house of Joseph," representing the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, as they continued the challenging post-Joshua conquest of the Promised Land. The verse specifically details their decision to dispatch a team to "descry" or spy out the city of Bethel, a location of immense historical and spiritual significance, noting parenthetically that it was formerly known as Luz. This methodical approach to warfare highlights the ongoing tribal efforts to secure their allotted territories and sets the stage for their subsequent engagement with the Canaanite inhabitants of this pivotal central city.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Judges 1:23 effectively employs several literary devices to convey its message. The most prominent is the Parenthetical Note, "(Now the name of the city before [was] Luz.)" This immediate clarification provides crucial background information without disrupting the flow of the main action. It serves to enrich the reader's understanding by connecting the current event to a significant historical and theological past, specifically Jacob's encounter at Bethel in Genesis. This creates a powerful Historical Allusion, reminding the reader of the city's sacred significance to Israel and its transformation. Furthermore, the verse uses Juxtaposition by placing the former pagan name "Luz" alongside the sacred name "Bethel." This stark contrast highlights the theme of spiritual transformation and the re-dedication of the land from common or pagan usage to a place consecrated to Yahweh. The strategic action of "descrying" also subtly employs Foreshadowing, as it hints at the ongoing challenges, the need for persistent effort, and the often-incomplete nature of the conquest that will characterize the turbulent period of the Judges.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Judges 1:23 transcends a mere historical record of military tactics; it is rich with theological significance. It underscores the divine mandate for Israel to possess the land, yet it simultaneously highlights the human responsibility required for its fulfillment. The act of "descrying" Bethel, a place already sanctified by God's presence in Jacob's time, signifies that even in divinely ordained tasks, diligence, wisdom, and strategic planning are essential. It teaches that God's promises do not negate human effort but rather empower and direct it. The transformation from Luz to Bethel serves as a powerful metaphor for the sanctification of space and, by extension, the sanctification of lives and cultures as they come under the dominion of God. It reminds us that places, like people, can be redeemed from common or pagan origins and dedicated to the worship and purposes of the Almighty. This verse, therefore, speaks to the ongoing tension between divine sovereignty and human agency in the unfolding of God's redemptive plan, emphasizing that faith in God's promises should lead to diligent action.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Judges 1:23 offers profound insights for contemporary believers, calling us to a thoughtful and intentional approach to our spiritual lives. Just as the house of Joseph diligently "descried" Bethel, we are called to be strategic and intentional in pursuing God's will and possessing the spiritual blessings He has given us (Ephesians 1:3). Possessing these blessings often requires careful discernment, prayerful planning, and persistent effort, not merely passive expectation. We must "spy out" the challenges, understand the spiritual landscape, and prepare for the battles ahead, recognizing that spiritual warfare is real. Furthermore, the transformation of Luz to Bethel serves as a powerful metaphor for the sanctification of our own lives and spheres of influence. Are there "Luz" areas in our lives—places of commonness, past sin, unredeemed habits, or unyielded ambitions—that God desires to transform into "Bethels," "Houses of God," where His presence is acknowledged, His will is honored, and His glory is manifested? This verse encourages us to actively participate with God in the ongoing work of redemption, both personally and communally, diligently seeking to bring every aspect of our lives under His Lordship and to be agents of His transforming power in the world.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is the "house of Joseph" specifically mentioned, rather than just "Israelites"?
Answer: The mention of the "house of Joseph" (representing the powerful tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh) is significant because it highlights the decentralized nature of the conquest after Joshua's death. The book of Judges emphasizes that individual tribes were responsible for dispossessing the Canaanites in their allotted territories. The house of Joseph was a particularly prominent and powerful tribal group, often taking a leading role in the central and northern regions. Their specific mention here underscores their initiative, military capability, and strategic importance in securing the central highlands, particularly a key city like Bethel, which was central to their tribal inheritance. This tribal focus sets the stage for the fragmented and often incomplete conquest narrative that characterizes the book of Judges, where tribal faithfulness (or lack thereof) directly impacted the success of the land's possession.
What is the significance of the city's name change from Luz to Bethel?
Answer: The name change from Luz to Bethel is deeply significant, carrying both historical and theological weight. "Luz" was the city's original Canaanite name, possibly meaning "almond tree" or "deviation," hinting at its pagan associations. "Bethel" means "House of God," a name famously given by Jacob after his profound encounter with God there, where he had a vision of a ladder reaching to heaven and received divine promises (Genesis 28:10-22). The parenthetical note in Judges 1:23 serves as a crucial historical allusion, connecting the present military action to this foundational moment in Israel's patriarchal history. Theologically, it signifies the transformation and sanctification of a pagan or common place into a site dedicated to Yahweh. It emphasizes that the conquest was not just about territorial acquisition but about establishing God's presence and dominion in the land, transforming its identity from one of paganism to one of divine encounter, thereby fulfilling God's promise to make Israel a holy nation.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Judges 1:23, with its focus on the strategic conquest of Bethel, a "House of God," finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Testament. While the Israelites sought to establish a physical "House of God" in the land, Jesus Christ Himself is the ultimate and true "House of God" among humanity. As the Word made flesh, He "dwelt among us" (John 1:14), embodying the very presence of God. He declared Himself to be the new temple, the dwelling place of God, stating, "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up" (John 2:19), referring to His own body as the ultimate sanctuary. Furthermore, the transformation of Luz (a place of commonness or paganism) into Bethel (a "House of God") through Israelite conquest foreshadows the spiritual transformation wrought by Christ. Through His redemptive work, He conquers the "territory" of sin and death in human hearts, transforming individuals and communities from places of spiritual "Luz" into living "Bethels"—temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). The "descrying" or strategic reconnaissance of Bethel also points to Christ, who perfectly understood the spiritual landscape and strategically executed God's plan for salvation, ultimately leading to the establishment of the church as God's spiritual house, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone (Ephesians 2:19-22). Just as Jacob saw a ladder connecting heaven and earth at Bethel (Genesis 28:12), Jesus is the ultimate ladder, the sole mediator through whom humanity can access the Father (John 14:6), making true fellowship with God possible.