Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
When Israel H3478 was a child H5288, then I loved H157 him, and called H7121 my son H1121 out of Egypt H4714.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"When Isra'el was a child, I loved him; and out of Egypt I called my son.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.
Ask
American Standard Version
When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
When Israel was a childe, then I loued him, and called my sonne out of Egypt.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Because Israel is a youth, and I love him, Out of Egypt I have called for My Son.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Hosea 11:1 opens with a tender and profound declaration of God's enduring love for Israel, recalling their earliest days as a nation. It portrays God as a loving Father who initiated a relationship with Israel when they were vulnerable and dependent, culminating in their miraculous deliverance from Egyptian bondage. This verse establishes a foundational understanding of God's steadfast grace, unconditional love, and unwavering commitment to His covenant people, even in anticipation of their future unfaithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Hosea 11:1 stands within a section of the book (chapters 11-14) where God's deep, fatherly love for Israel is juxtaposed with their persistent rebellion and idolatry. While previous chapters detail Israel's spiritual adultery and the impending judgment, this verse marks a poignant shift, reminding the reader of the historical foundation of God's relationship with His people. It serves as a powerful appeal to Israel's memory of God's past faithfulness, aiming to evoke repentance by highlighting the stark contrast between His unwavering love and their broken covenant. The verse immediately follows a passage detailing Israel's spiritual decline and reliance on foreign alliances, making God's recollection of their infancy and His redemptive act all the more striking.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Book of Hosea was delivered to the Northern Kingdom of Israel (Ephraim) during the 8th century BCE, a period marked by significant political instability, moral decay, and widespread idolatry. Israel had abandoned their covenant with Yahweh, engaging in syncretistic worship of Baal and seeking alliances with Assyria and Egypt rather than trusting in God. The reference to Israel as "a child" and being "called... out of Egypt" directly harks back to the Exodus event, a foundational narrative for Israel's identity. This historical liberation from Egyptian slavery, around the 15th-13th century BCE, was the defining moment when God constituted Israel as His chosen nation, demonstrating His power and covenant faithfulness. Culturally, the concept of a father-son relationship was deeply significant, implying care, instruction, inheritance, and discipline, which God applies to His relationship with Israel.
  • Key Themes: This verse encapsulates several major theological and narrative themes prevalent throughout Hosea and the broader prophetic literature. Foremost is God's Paternal Love and Initiative, expressed through the tender imagery of a father loving his "child" and calling "my son" out of bondage. This highlights God's sovereign choice and the unconditional nature of His affection, demonstrating that His relationship with Israel was born out of His grace, not their merit. Another crucial theme is Divine Redemption and Deliverance, as the act of calling Israel "out of Egypt" refers to the miraculous Exodus, God's powerful intervention to liberate His people from slavery and establish them as a free nation bound to Him by covenant. This serves as a paradigm for God's ongoing redemptive work. Finally, the verse carries significant Typological Significance, as its language foreshadows a later, greater fulfillment in the New Testament, particularly in the person of Jesus Christ, as seen in Matthew 2:15.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • loved (Hebrew, ʼâhab', H157): This word signifies a deep, affectionate, and committed love, often used in the context of covenant relationships between God and His people. Here, it underscores God's profound emotional bond and unwavering commitment to Israel, initiated not by their merit but by His sovereign choice and enduring faithfulness. It is a love that precedes and motivates His redemptive actions.
  • child (Hebrew, naʻar', H5288): H5288 refers to a boy or young person, from infancy to adolescence. In this context, it vividly portrays Israel's nascent stage as a nation, emphasizing their vulnerability, dependence, and immaturity when God first chose and delivered them. This imagery highlights that God's love was extended to them not based on their strength or achievements, but purely on His compassionate initiative and grace.
  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1121): Derived from a root meaning "to build," refers to a son, offspring, or heir in a broad sense. Applied to Israel, it establishes a profound familial and covenantal relationship with God as their Father, signifying their special status as His chosen heir and beloved people. This term underscores the intimacy and unique privilege of their relationship with the divine.
  • Egypt (Hebrew, Mitsrayim', H4714): H4714 refers to Upper and Lower Egypt. This geographical reference grounds the prophecy in the historical reality of Israel's bondage and miraculous deliverance. It serves as the foundational act of God's redemptive love for His people, a pivotal event that shaped Israel's national and spiritual identity and established their covenant relationship with Yahweh.

Verse Breakdown

  • "When Israel [was] a child": This opening clause sets the scene by recalling the earliest period of Israel's national existence. The phrase "a child" is a powerful personification of the nation, emphasizing their infancy, weakness, and complete dependence, much like a helpless infant. It highlights that God's love and intervention predated any strength or merit on Israel's part, underscoring the gracious and unmerited nature of His choice.
  • "then I loved him": This declaration reveals the divine motivation behind God's subsequent actions. It emphasizes the deep, tender, and unconditional love that God harbored for Israel from their very beginnings. This love is not a reaction to Israel's worthiness but an expression of God's inherent character and His sovereign choice to enter into a covenant relationship with them. It is the foundational truth upon which all of God's dealings with Israel are based.
  • "and called my son out of Egypt": This climactic statement directly alludes to the Exodus, the foundational event in Israel's history. God's act of "calling out" signifies His powerful, authoritative summons and miraculous liberation of Israel from slavery in Egypt. The designation "my son" reinforces the intimate, familial bond between God and Israel, portraying Him as the Father who actively intervenes to rescue His beloved offspring from oppression. This phrase encapsulates God's redemptive faithfulness and His establishment of Israel as His distinct people.

Literary Devices

Hosea 11:1 is rich with literary devices that amplify its emotional and theological impact. The most prominent is Personification, where the entire nation of Israel is depicted as a vulnerable "child," allowing the prophet to convey God's tender, parental affection for His people. This imagery also sets up a powerful Metaphor of God as a loving Father and Israel as His beloved son, establishing an intimate familial relationship that transcends mere covenant and underscores the depth of God's emotional investment. Furthermore, the phrase "called my son out of Egypt" is a direct Allusion to the historical Exodus event, serving as a foundational narrative reference point that grounds the prophecy in Israel's collective memory and highlights God's past faithfulness and redemptive power. This allusion also carries significant Typological weight, foreshadowing a greater fulfillment in the New Testament.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Hosea 11:1 profoundly articulates the nature of God's covenantal love, portraying it as a deep, paternal affection that predates and initiates His redemptive acts. It underscores the truth that God's relationship with His people is founded on His unmerited grace and sovereign choice, not on their inherent worthiness or obedience. This verse highlights God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises, even in the face of Israel's future rebellion, setting the stage for the book's themes of divine discipline and ultimate restoration. It reveals a God who is passionately committed to His "son," willing to deliver and nurture, even when that son proves wayward. This divine love is a consistent theme throughout Scripture, reflecting God's steadfast character and His desire for an intimate relationship with humanity.

  • Exodus 4:22: "And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn." This earlier declaration reinforces the "son" imagery and Israel's unique status.
  • Deuteronomy 8:5: "Thou shalt consider in thine heart, that, as a man chasteneth his son, so the LORD thy God chasteneth thee." This highlights the father-son relationship's disciplinary aspect, which is a key part of Hosea's message.
  • Jeremiah 31:3: "The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee." This verse echoes the theme of God's enduring and initiating love for His people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Hosea 11:1 offers a powerful lens through which to view God's character and His relentless pursuit of His people. It reminds us that God's love is not conditional upon our perfection or performance, but is a sovereign, initiating love extended to us in our weakness and dependence. Just as He loved Israel in their infancy and delivered them from bondage, He extends that same steadfast love and redemptive grace to us today. This verse invites us to reflect on God's past faithfulness in our own lives, acknowledging His grace and intervention even when we have stumbled or strayed. It encourages a deeper trust in His unchanging nature and His commitment to His covenant. Understanding God's paternal heart, as revealed here, should inspire both profound gratitude for His unmerited favor and a renewed desire to respond to His love with faithful obedience.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the imagery of God loving Israel "when [they were] a child" speak to your understanding of God's love for you in your own moments of weakness or immaturity?
  • In what ways has God "called you out of Egypt" – that is, delivered you from bondage or difficult circumstances – demonstrating His redemptive love in your life?
  • How does recognizing God as a loving Father, as depicted in this verse, influence your prayer life and your trust in His provision and guidance?

FAQ

Why does God refer to Israel as "a child" and "my son" in this verse?

Answer: God uses the tender imagery of "a child" and "my son" to emphasize the profound intimacy and paternal affection He held for Israel from their very beginnings. The term "child" (Hebrew, naʻar) highlights Israel's nascent stage as a nation, signifying their vulnerability, dependence, and immaturity when God first chose and delivered them from Egypt. It underscores that God's love was extended to them not based on their strength or merit, but purely on His initiative and grace. The designation "my son" (Hebrew, bên) further establishes a unique familial and covenantal relationship, portraying God as their loving Father and Israel as His cherished offspring, chosen to inherit His promises and bear His name. This language sets the tone for understanding God's subsequent discipline and restoration throughout the book of Hosea, much like a father raising his child.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hosea 11:1 finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ, as explicitly cited in Matthew 2:15. While Hosea originally referred to God's historical deliverance of the nation of Israel from Egyptian bondage, Matthew applies this prophecy to Jesus' return from Egypt as an infant, having fled Herod's persecution. This typological fulfillment reveals Jesus as the true and perfect Israel, the ultimate "Son" of God, who perfectly embodies the nation's calling and destiny. Unlike the nation of Israel, who repeatedly failed to live up to their covenant responsibilities despite God's love, Jesus, the Son, lived a life of perfect obedience and faithfulness, even unto death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). He is the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), accomplishing a greater Exodus—liberating humanity from the bondage of sin and death. In Jesus, God's paternal love for His "son" is fully realized, and through Him, all who believe are adopted into God's family as beloved children (Romans 8:15).

Copy as

Commentary on Hosea 11 verses 1–7

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Here we find,

I. God very gracious to Israel. They were a people for whom he had done more than for any people under heaven, and to whom he had given more, which they are here, I will not say upbraided with (for God gives, and upbraids not), but put in mind of, as an aggravation of their sin and an encouragement to repentance. 1. He had a kindness for them when they were young (Hos 11:1): When Israel was a child then I loved him; when they first began to multiply into a nation in Egypt God then set his love upon them, and chose them because he loved them, because he would love them, Deu 7:7, Deu 7:8. When they were weak and helpless as children, foolish and froward as children, when they were outcasts, and children exposed, then God loved them; he pitied them, and testified his goodwill to them; he bore them as the nurse does the sucking child, nourished them, and suffered their manners. Note, Those that have grown up, nay, those that have grown old, ought often to reflect upon the goodness of God to them in their childhood. 2. He delivered them out of the house of bondage: I called my son out of Egypt, because a son, because a beloved son. When God demanded Israel's discharge from Pharaoh he called them his son, his first-born. Note, Those whom God loves he calls out of the bondage of sin and Satan into the glorious liberty of his children. These words are said to have been fulfilled in Christ, when, upon the death of Herod, he and his parents were called out of Egypt (Mat 2:15), so that the words have a double aspect, speaking historically of the calling of Israel out of Egypt and prophetically of the bringing of Christ thence; and the former was a type of the latter, and a pledge and earnest of the many and great favours God had in reserve for that people, especially the sending of his Son into the world, and the bringing him again into the land of Israel when they had unkindly driven him out, and he might justly never have returned. The calling of Christ out of Egypt was a figure of the calling of all that are his, through him, out of spiritual slavery. 3. He gave them a good education, took care of them, took pains with them, not only as a father or tutor, but, such is the condescension of divine grace, as a mother or nurse (Hos 11:3): I taught Ephraim also to go, as a child in leading-strings is taught. When they were in the wilderness God led them by the pillar of cloud and fire, showed them the way in which they should go, and bore them up, taking them by the arms. He taught them to go in the way of his commandments, by the institutions of the ceremonial law, which were as tutors and governors to that people under age. He took them by the arms, to guide them, that they might not stray, and to hold them up, that they might not stumble and fall. God's spiritual Israel are thus supported. Thou has holden me by my right hand, Psa 73:23. 4. When any thing was amiss with them, or they were ever so little out of order, he was their physician: "I healed them; I not only took a tender care of them (a friend may do that), but wrought an effectual cure: it is a God only that can do that. I am the Lord that healeth thee (Exo 15:26), that redresseth all thy grievances." 5. He brought them into his service by mild and gentle methods (Hos 11:4): I drew them with cords of a man, with bands of love. Note, It is God's work to draw poor souls to himself; and none can come to him except he draw them, Joh 6:44. He draws, (1.) With the cords of a man, with such cords as men draw with that have a principle of humanity, or such cords as men are drawn with; he dealt with them as men, in an equitable rational way, in an easy gentle way, with the cords of Adam. He dealt with them as with Adam in innocency, bringing them at once into a paradise, and into covenant with himself. (2.) With bands of love, or cartropes of love. This word signifies stronger cords than the former. He did not drive them by force into his service, whether they would or no, nor rule them with rigour, nor detain them by violence, but his attractives were all loving and endearing, all sweet and gentle, that he might overcome them with kindness. Moses, whom he made their guide, was the meekest man in the world. Kindnesses among men we commonly call obligations, or bonds, bonds of love. Thus God draws with the savour of his good ointments (Sol 1:4), draws with lovingkindness, Jer 31:3. Thus God deals with us, and we must deal in like manner with those that are under our instruction and government, deal rationally and mildly with them. 6. He eased them of the burdens they had been long groaning under: I was to them as those that take off the yoke on their jaws, alluding to the care of the good husbandman, who is merciful to his beast, and will not tire him with hard and constant labour. Probably, in those times, the yoke on the neck of the oxen was fastened with some bridle, or headstall, over the jaws, which muzzled the mouth of the ox. Israel in Egypt were thus restrained from the enjoyments of their comforts and constrained to hard labour; but God eased them, removed their shoulder from the burden, Psa 81:6. Note, Liberty is a great mercy, especially out of bondage. 7. He supplied them with food convenient. In Egypt they fared hard, but, when God brought them out, he laid meat unto them, as the husbandman, when he has unyoked his cattle, fodders them. God rained manna about their camp, bread from heaven, angels' food; other creatures seek their meat, but God laid meat to his own people, as we do to our children, was himself their caterer and carver, anticipated them with the blessings of goodness.

II. Here is Israel very ungrateful to God.

1.They were deaf and disobedient to his voice. He spoke to them by his messengers, Moses and his other prophets, called them from their sins, called them to himself, to their work and duty; but as they called them so they went from them; they rebelled in those particular instances wherein they were admonished; the more pressing and importunate the prophets were with them, to persuade them to that which was good, the more refractory they were, and the more resolute in their evil ways, disobeying for disobedience-sake. This foolishness is bound in the hearts of children, who, as soon as they are taught to go, will go from those that call them.

2.They were fond of idols, and worshipped them: They sacrificed to Baalim, first one Baal and then another, and burnt incense to graven images, though they were called to by the prophets of the Lord again and again not to do this abominable thing which he hated. Idolatry was the sin which from the beginning, and all along, had most easily beset them.

3.They were regardless of God, and of his favours to them: They knew not that I healed them. They looked only at Moses and Aaron, the instruments of their relief, and, when any thing was amiss, quarrelled with them, but looked not through them to God who employed them. Or, When God corrected them, and kept them under a severe discipline, they understood not that it was for their good, and that God thereby healed them, and it was necessary for the perfecting of their cure, else they would have been better reconciled to the methods God took. Note, Ignorance is at the bottom of ingratitude, Hos 2:8.

4.They were strongly inclined to apostasy. This is the blackest article in the charge (Hos 11:7): My people are bent to backsliding from me. Every word here is aggravating. (1.) They backslide. There is no hold of them, no stedfastness in them; they seem to come forward, towards God, but they quickly slide back again, and are as a deceitful bow. (2.) They backslide from me, from God, the chief good, the fountain of life and living waters, from their God who never turned from them, nor war as a wilderness to them. (3.) They are bent to backslide; they are ready to sin; there is in their natures a propensity to that which is evil; at the best they hang in suspense between God and the world, so that a little thing serves to draw them the wrong way; they are forward to close with every temptation. It also intimates that they are resolute in sin; their hearts are fully set in them to do evil the bias is strong that way; and they persist in their backslidings, whatever is said or done to stop them; and yet, (4.) "They are, in profession, my people. They are called by my name, and profess relation to me; they are mine, whom I have done much for and expect much from, whom I have nourished and brought up, as children, and yet they backslide from me." Note, In our repentance we ought to lament not only our backslidings, but our bent to backslide, not only our actual transgressions, but our original corruption, the sin that dwells in us, the carnal mind.

5.They were strangely averse to repentance and reformation. Here are two expressions of their obstinacy: - (1.) They refused to return, Hos 11:5. So much were they bent to backslide that, though they could not but find, upon trial, the folly of their backslidings, and that when they forsook God they changed for the worse, yet they went on frowardly. I have loved strangers, and after them I will go. They were commanded to return, were courted and entreated to return, were promised that if they would they should be kindly received, but they refused. (2.) Though they called them to the Most High. God's prophets and ministers called them to return to the God from whom they had revolted, to the most high God, from whom they had sunk into this wretched degeneracy; they called them from the worship of the idols, which were so much below them, and the worship of which was therefore their disparagement, to the true God, who was so much above them, and the worship of whom was therefore their preferment; they called them from this earth to high and heavenly things; but they called in vain. None at all would exalt him. Though he is the most high God they would not acknowledge him to be so, would do nothing to honour him nor give him the glory due to his name. Or, They would not exalt themselves, would not rise out of that state of apostasy and misery into which they had precipitated themselves; but there they contentedly lay still, would not lift up their heads nor lift up their souls. Note, God's faithful ministers have taken a great deal of pains, to no purpose, with backsliding children, have called them to the Most High; but none would stir, none at all would exalt him.

III. Here is God very angry, and justly so, with Israel; see what are the tokens of God's displeasure with which they are here threatened. 1. God, who brought them out of Egypt, to take them for a people to himself, since they would not be faithful to him, shall bring them into a worse condition than he at first found them in (Hos 11:5): "He shall not return into the land of Egypt, though that was a house of bondage grievous enough; but he shall go into a harder service, for the Assyrian shall be his king, who will use him worse than ever Pharaoh did." They shall not return into Egypt, which lies near, where they may hear often from their own country, and whence they may hope shortly to return to it again; but they shall be carried into Assyria, which lies much more remote, and where they shall be cut off from all correspondence with their own land and from all hopes of returning to it, and justly, because they refused to return. Note, Those that will not return to the duties they have left cannot expect to return to the comforts they have lost. 2. God, who gave them Canaan, that good land, and a very safe and comfortable settlement in it, shall bring his judgments upon them there, which shall make their habitation unsafe and uncomfortable (Hos 11:6): The sword shall come upon them, the sword of war, the sword of a foreign enemy, prevailing against them and triumphing over them. (1.) This judgment shall spread far. The sword shall fasten upon their cities, those nests of people and store-houses of wealth; it shall likewise reach to their branches, the country villages (so some), the citizens themselves (so others), or the bars (so the word signifies) and gates of their city, or all the branches of their revenue and wealth, or their children, the branches of their families. (2.) It shall last long: It shall abide on their cities. David thought three months flying before his enemies was the only judgment of the three that was to be excepted against; but this sword shall abide much longer than three months on the cities of Israel. They continued their rebellions against God, and therefore God continued his judgments on them. (3.) It shall make a full end: It shall consume their branches, and devour them, and lay all waste, and this because of their own counsels, that is, because they would have their own projects, which God therefore, in a way of righteous judgment, gave them up to. Note, The confusion of sinners is owing to their contrivance. God's counsels would have saved them, but their own counsels ruined them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–7. Public domain.
Copy as
Matthew 2:13-15AD 60
And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him. When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt: And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son. [Hosea 11:1]
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 3:8–9
Because Israel, symbolically called “son” since Egypt, had lost its sonship through having worshiped Baal and offered incense to idols, John gave them a name which suited them: race of vipers. Because these had lost that title of sonship, which had been poured over them through grace in the days of Moses, they received from John a name congruent with their deeds. After the Lord went down into the land of the Egyptians and had returned from there, the Evangelist said, “Now the true word spoken by the prophet is accomplished.” He said, “I will call my son out of Egypt.” He also said, “He will be called a Nazarene,” because in Hebrew nezer means a “scepter,” and the prophet calls him a “Nazarene” because he is the Son of the scepter.
Gregory of NazianzusAD 390
ON THE ARRIVAL OF THE EGYPTIANS, ORATION 34:1
I will address myself as is right to those who have come from Egypt. They have come here eagerly, having overcome ill will by zeal. They come from that Egypt which is enriched by the river who is Christ, raining out of the earth and like the sea in its season—if I too may follow in my small measure those who have so eloquently spoken of these matters. They too are enriched by Christ my Lord. He too was once fugitive in Egypt; the first, when he fled from Herod’s massacre of the children, and now by the love of the fathers for their children, by Christ the new food of those who hunger after good, who offers the greatest alms of corn of which history speaks and men believe. He is the bread that came down from heaven and gives life to the world, that life which is indestructible and indissoluble. It is of him that I now seem to hear the Father saying, “Out of Egypt have I called my son.”
John ChrysostomAD 407
DEMONSTRATION AGAINST THE PAGANS 3:7
Herod sought him after his birth. He was going to kill all the children in that place. And the prophet revealed this too, foretelling it long beforehand when he said, “A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, mourning and much weeping, of Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are not.” The Scriptures also predicted that he would come to Egypt when they said, “Out of Egypt I called my son.”
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Hosea 11:1-2
"Just as the morning passes, the king of Israel passes away: for Israel is a boy, and I have loved him, and I called my son out of Egypt: they called them: so they went from their presence: they sacrificed to Baalim, and offered sacrifices to idols." LXX: "They have cast off the morning, the king of Israel has been cast off, because Israel is a little one, and I have loved him, and have called his sons out of Egypt. As I called them, so they went away from my face: they immolated to Baalim, and burnt incense to idols." He explains the same idea in different ways. As he previously said: "He made his king pass over Samaria like foam on the surface of the water", because foam and bubbles that float on the surface of water rapidly dissolve; now he puts the same thing in another comparison. Just as the dawn and the beginning of the day, which is called morning, quickly passes between the night and the vicinity of the sun; so that the night is finished and daybreak comes: so the king of Israel, that is, of the ten tribes, will pass quickly. And He explains the benefits that God had conferred upon himself. He says: "While I was still a young boy and a captive in Egypt, I loved him so much that I sent my servant Moses to call my Son out of Egypt, of whom I spoke in another place, 'My firstborn Son, Israel' (Exodus IV). And because Israel is singularly spoken of, but understood in a plural sense, like both the people and Ephraim and Judah: since there are many in number who are included in this number, an old history recalls that He had called them through Moses and Aaron, who had called them to leave Egypt: but those who were called by them left them, turning their backs on them and indicating by bodily gesture the stubbornness of their minds. Nor was it enough for them to despise those who called upon them unless they sacrificed to Baal and their idols, or offered incense to their images. We read that Baal was first worshipped under Achab, king of Israel, who took as his wife the daughter of the king of Sidon, and transferred the idol of Babylon and the Phoenicians to Samaria. Thus, he combines sins separated by time into one discourse: how they were first called from Egypt and named sons, then withdrew from God in the wilderness, worshipping Beelphegor more than God, and afterwards served Baalim and Astaroth, and other idols in the holy land. And we understand heretics passing by like the dawn, and their king as the devil or heresiarch, whom in infancy (when they believed in the Church, and were little ones, and were considered in Christ's name) God loved, and called them out of the tribulation and darkness of Egypt. He called through the apostles and teachers of the Church. But when they were called by my leaders, they turned away from them, and worshiped Beelphegor, that is, they served their vices and lust, and afterwards sacrificed to Baalim and idols, which they had fashioned for themselves. For each heretic has his own gods, and they worship whatever they have made as if it were an idol or a statue. As for what we have said, "Out of Egypt I have called my Son" (Matth. II), the Septuagint translated it to "Out of Egypt I have called his sons," which is not in the Hebrew; there is no doubt that Matthew took this testimony according to the Hebrew truth. Therefore, those who disparage our translation should provide Scripture from which the Evangelist took this testimony, and it should be interpreted in the Lord and Savior, when he was brought back from Egypt to the land of Israel. And when they cannot find (it), they cease to ask respectfully, arch their eyebrow, curl their nostrils, and snap their fingers. Julian Augustus vomited (slanders) against us Christians in this place, in the seventh volume, and says: that which is written of Israel, Matthew the evangelist translated to Christ, in order to mock the simplicity of those who believed from the nations. We will respond to this briefly: Firstly, that Matthew published the Gospel in Hebrew letters, which the Hebrews alone could read. Therefore, he did not do it to mock the Gentiles. But if he wanted to mock the Hebrews, he was either foolish or ignorant: foolish, if he concocted an obvious falsehood; ignorant, if he did not understand what he was saying. The work itself excuses any foolishness, since it is prudently and carefully arranged; we cannot call him ignorant, since we know from other testimony of the Scriptures that he had knowledge of the Law. It remains for us to say that those things that precede in others typologically are related to Christ according to truth and fulfillment: which we know the Apostle did in the two mountains, Sinai and Zion, and in Sarah and Hagar. For neither is Sinai now, nor is it Zion: neither was it Sara, nor was it Agar; because the Apostle Paul said these things with respect to the two Testaments (Gal. IV). Therefore, what is written: "A little one shall become a thousand, and a small one a perfect nation: I the Lord will suddenly do this thing in its time," is indeed said of the people of Israel, who are called forth from Egypt, who are loved, who at that time, after the error of idolatrous worship, are called like infants and little ones: but it is also perfectly referred to Christ. For Isaac also was a figure of Christ in that he carried the wood for his own sacrifice (Gen 22); and Jacob, because he had a wife whom he did not love (Leah) and one whom he did (Rachel) (Gen 29). In Leah, the elder sister, we may understand the blindness of the Synagogue; in Rachel’s beauty, the glory of the Church. Yet those who in some degree are figures of the Lord’s Saviourship, are not in every detail to be believed to have done the same things in a figure. For a type indicates a part: but if the whole precedes in the type, it is no longer a type, but should be called the truth of history. We said this briefly in the Commentaries; now let us return to the rest.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 11:1–4
It is as a result of folly and a childish attitude that they suffer this punishment. I recalled them from Egypt and freed them from that harsh servitude, but they proved ungrateful to me and opted for the worship of the idols (referring to them as “Baals”). Though I was the one who taught them to walk, who cured them of their awkward gait, showed them paternal affection and applied all kinds of healing to them, they refused to acknowledge me, even though I protected them from manifold destruction at the hands of the invaders as if clutching them to me in love like a kind of bond. It is in love that even now I care for them and invest them in these chastisements, acting in the manner of someone striking a forward child on the cheek.
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
I called my son: Viz., Israel. But as the calling of Israel out of Egypt, was a figure of the calling of Christ from thence; therefore this text is also applicable to Christ, as we learn from Matthew 2. 15.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hosea 11:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.