Genesis 36:34

Translation
King James Version
And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of Temani reigned in his stead.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Jobab H3103 died H4191, and Husham H2367 of the land H776 of Temani H8489 reigned H4427 in his stead.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When Yovav died, Husham from the land of the Temani reigned in his place.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When Jobab died, Husham from the land of the Temanites reigned in his place.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his stead.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Jobab died, and Husham of the land of the Temanites reigned in his place.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
When Iobab also was dead, Husham of the land of Temani reigned in his steade.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Jobab dieth, and reign in his stead doth Husham from the land of the Temanite.
Ask
See also
Jeremiah 49:7Genesis 36:11Genesis 36:15Job 2:11
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Esau and Edom
Esau and Edom View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 1,075 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 36:34 provides a concise yet significant entry within the extensive genealogical record of Esau's descendants, detailing the death of Jobab, the second king of Edom, and the subsequent ascension of Husham, who hailed from the land of Temani. This brief historical note serves as a vital component of a larger list of early Edomite monarchs, underscoring the meticulous nature of biblical historiography and illustrating the universal cycle of leadership transition in ancient Near Eastern societies, all operating under the overarching providence of God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within Genesis 36, a chapter singularly devoted to the lineage and establishment of the nation of Edom, tracing the descendants of Esau, Jacob's twin brother. Specifically, Genesis 36:34 is part of a distinct list of eight kings who reigned in Edom before the Israelites had any king, a detail explicitly highlighted in Genesis 36:31. This immediate literary context emphasizes the independent rise of Edom as a sovereign nation, distinct from and preceding the formation of Israel's monarchy. The transition from Jobab to Husham is one in a series of successions, reinforcing the chapter's purpose as a comprehensive historical and genealogical account of Esau's progeny and their burgeoning kingdom.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period described in Genesis 36 predates the Israelite monarchy and even the full establishment of Israel as a nation in Canaan. Edom, situated southeast of the Dead Sea, was a significant regional power, controlling vital trade routes. The mention of "kings" suggests a more centralized political structure than the tribal chieftainships also listed in the chapter (e.g., Genesis 36:40-43). The succession through death was a common and accepted means of leadership change in the ancient Near East, reflecting the realities of mortality and the need for continuous governance. The reference to "Temani" points to Tema or Teman, a prominent region within Edom, known in later biblical texts for its wisdom (e.g., Jeremiah 49:7) and its strategic location.

  • Key Themes: Genesis 36:34 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights the Sovereignty of God over all nations, demonstrating that God's historical record extends beyond the covenant line of Abraham to encompass the development of other peoples, including those who would become Israel's adversaries. Secondly, it underscores the Reliability and Detail of Scripture, showing the Bible's commitment to recording precise historical and genealogical information, grounding its theological truths in verifiable, though sometimes brief, facts. Lastly, the verse implicitly touches upon the Transient Nature of Earthly Power and the Inevitability of Succession, as one king dies and another takes his place, a universal human experience that points to the ultimate King whose reign is eternal.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

The statement "And Jobab died, and Husham of the land of Temani reigned in his stead" is a succinct historical declaration, characteristic of genealogical records. It chronicles a pivotal moment in Edomite history—the transition of its monarchy.

Key Word Analysis

  • died (Hebrew, mûwth', H4191): This primitive root (H4191) signifies the literal cessation of life, but can also be used figuratively for destruction or perishing. In this context, it denotes the natural end of Jobab's earthly reign through physical death, a common and unavoidable reality for all humanity, including kings. The straightforward use here emphasizes the finality of his rule and the necessity of succession.
  • reigned (Hebrew, mâlak', H4427): This primitive root (H4427) means "to reign" or "to ascend the throne," and causatively, "to induct into royalty." It indicates the formal assumption of sovereign power and authority. Husham's "reigning" implies a legitimate, recognized transfer of leadership, establishing him as the new monarch of Edom in Jobab's place.
  • Temani (Hebrew, Têymânîy', H8489): This term (H8489) is a patronymic, meaning "a Temanite" or "descendant of Teman." Teman was a significant district within Edom, named after one of Esau's grandsons (Eliphaz's son, Genesis 36:11). Identifying Husham as "of the land of Temani" provides a specific geographical and tribal origin for the new king, linking him to a well-known and influential part of the Edomite territory.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Jobab died": This clause directly states the conclusion of Jobab's reign. As the second king listed in the Edomite monarchy, his death marks a significant point of transition, highlighting the finite nature of human rule and the continuous flow of history. The brevity of the statement conveys the factual, unadorned reality of mortality.
  • "and Husham of the land of Temani reigned in his stead": This clause introduces Jobab's successor, Husham. The phrase "of the land of Temani" provides crucial geographical and tribal identification for Husham, indicating his origin from a specific, prominent region within Edom. The act of "reigning in his stead" signifies a formal and legitimate transfer of power, establishing Husham as the new sovereign ruler, maintaining the continuity of the Edomite monarchy.

Literary Devices

Genesis 36:34 primarily functions as a Genealogical Record and Historical Account. Its most prominent literary device is Succinctness or Brevity. The verse offers no details about Jobab's life or reign, nor does it elaborate on the circumstances of Husham's ascension, other than his origin. This conciseness is characteristic of biblical genealogies, which prioritize the factual transmission of lineage and succession over elaborate narrative. The simple declarative sentences serve to efficiently convey critical information about the sequence of Edomite kings, contributing to the comprehensive historical tapestry of the ancient world that the Bible meticulously weaves. This brevity also implies the divine perspective, where the rise and fall of earthly rulers are but passing moments in God's grand, eternal plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Though a seemingly minor detail within a long genealogy, Genesis 36:34 subtly reinforces profound theological truths. It speaks to God's comprehensive sovereignty, not only over His chosen people, Israel, but over all nations and their rulers. The meticulous recording of the Edomite kings, including their deaths and successions, demonstrates that God's hand is active in the broader sweep of human history, orchestrating events even among those outside the direct covenant line. This divine oversight ensures that all earthly kingdoms and their transitions ultimately serve His overarching purposes, guiding humanity towards His redemptive plan.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 36:34, despite its brevity, invites us to ponder several deep truths. It reminds us that God's narrative is expansive, encompassing the histories of all peoples, not just those directly in the covenant line. This detail underscores the Bible's commitment to historical accuracy and its claim as a reliable record of God's interaction with the world. For us today, it highlights the transient nature of all earthly power and the universal reality of mortality. Whether in positions of leadership or in our daily lives, this verse calls us to recognize that our time and influence are finite. It encourages us to live with an awareness of God's overarching sovereignty, trusting that He is at work even in the seemingly mundane details of history, guiding all things toward His ultimate purposes. Our lives, no matter how briefly recorded or seemingly insignificant, are part of His grand design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Bible's meticulous recording of non-Israelite genealogies, like that of Edom, challenge or affirm your understanding of God's sovereignty over all nations?
  • What does the simple statement "Jobab died, and Husham... reigned in his stead" teach us about the nature of earthly power and the inevitability of change?
  • In what ways can recognizing God's control over historical details, even seemingly minor ones, strengthen our faith in His comprehensive plan for our own lives?

FAQ

Why is such a brief historical detail included in the Bible?

Answer: The Bible's inclusion of seemingly minor historical details, such as the succession of Edomite kings in Genesis 36:34, serves multiple crucial purposes. Firstly, it underscores the meticulous nature of biblical record-keeping, grounding its profound spiritual truths in verifiable historical and genealogical contexts. This demonstrates the Bible's commitment to factual accuracy. Secondly, it subtly affirms God's comprehensive sovereignty over all nations, not just Israel, illustrating His active involvement in the broader sweep of human history. Lastly, these details provide vital background information for understanding the complex future interactions between Israel and its neighbors, particularly Edom, whose history is rooted in the fraternal rivalry of Jacob and Esau.

Does "Temani" refer to a specific place or a people?

Answer: "Temani" (H8489) refers to both a specific geographical region and the people associated with it. It is a patronymic term derived from Tema (or Teman), which was a significant district within the land of Edom. Teman was named after one of Esau's grandsons, Teman, son of Eliphaz, thus establishing a tribal and territorial identity. This region was notably recognized for its wisdom, as referenced in later prophetic books like Jeremiah 49:7. Therefore, when Husham is described as "of the land of Temani," it indicates his origin from this specific, well-known, and influential area within the Edomite kingdom.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 36:34 directly concerns the succession of an Edomite king, its Christ-centered fulfillment is found in the overarching biblical theme of God's sovereign control over all of history and every nation, ultimately working towards the establishment of His eternal kingdom. The meticulous recording of even the kings of Edom, a nation outside the direct covenant line of Israel, demonstrates that God's providence extends universally. He orchestrates the rise and fall of earthly kingdoms and leaders, ensuring that all events, including the political landscape of ancient Edom, serve His ultimate redemptive plan. This grand narrative culminates in the person of Jesus Christ, the true King of Kings and Lord of Lords, whose reign is not temporary like Jobab's or Husham's, but eternal and universal (Revelation 19:16). Every earthly kingdom and its ruler, whether known or unknown, ultimately points to the coming of Christ, the one who inherits all things and whose dominion will have no end (Luke 1:32-33). Thus, even a seemingly minor detail in an Edomite genealogy subtly reinforces the comprehensive scope of God's plan, which finds its perfect and final realization in Jesus Christ, the promised Messiah.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 36 verses 31–43

By degrees, it seems, the Edomites wormed out the Horites, obtained full possession of the country, and had a government of their own. 1. They were ruled by kings, who governed the whole country, and seem to have come to the throne by election, and not by lineal descent; so bishop Patrick observes. These kings reigned in Edom before there reigned any king over the children of Israel, that is, before Moses's time, for he was king in Jeshurun, Gen 36:3. God had lately promised Jacob that kings should come out of his loins (Gen 35:11), yet Esau's blood becomes royal long before any of Jacob's did. Note, In external prosperity and honour, the children of the covenant are often cast behind, and those that are out of covenant get the start. The triumphing of the wicked may be quick, but it is short; soon ripe, and as soon rotten: but the products of the promise, though they are slow, are sure and lasting; at the end it shall speak, and not lie. We may suppose it was a great trial to the faith of God's Israel to hear of the pomp and power of the kings of Edom, while they were bond-slaves in Egypt; but those that look for great things from God must be content to wait for them; God's time is the best time. 2. They were afterwards governed by dukes, again here named, who, I suppose, ruled all at the same time in several places in the country. Either they set up this form of government in conformity to the Horites, who had used it (Gen 36:29), or God's providence reduced them to it, as some conjecture, to correct them for their unkindness to Israel, in refusing them a passage though their country, Num 20:18. Note, When power is abused, it is just with God to weaken it, by turning it into divers channels. For the transgression of a land, many are the princes thereof. Sin brought Edom from kings to dukes, from crowns to coronets. We read of the dukes of Edom (Exo 15:15), yet, long afterwards, of their kings again. 3. Mount Seir is called the land of their possession, Gen 36:43. While the Israelites dwelt in the house of bondage, and their Canaan was only the land of promise, the Edomites dwelt in their own habitations, and Seir was in their possession. Note, The children of this world have their all in hand, and nothing in hope (Luk 16:25); while the children of God have their all in hope, and next to nothing in hand. But, all things considered, it is better to have Canaan in promise than mount Seir in possession.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 31–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 36:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.