TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Ezra 6 verses 1–12
We have here, I. The decree of Cyrus for the building of the temple repeated. To this the Samaritans referred because the Jews pleaded it, and perhaps hoped it would not be found, and then their plea would be over-ruled and a stop put to their work. Search was ordered to be made for it among the records; for, it seems, the tribes had not taken care to provide themselves with an authentic copy of it, which might have stood them in good stead, but they must appeal to the original. It was looked for in Babylon (Ezr 6:1), where Cyrus was when he signed it. But, when it was not found there, Darius did not make that a pretence to conclude that therefore there was no such decree, and thereupon to give judgment against the Jews; but it is probable, having himself heard that such a decree was certainly made, he ordered the rolls in other places to be searched, and at length it was found at Achmetha, in the province of the Medes, Ezr 6:2. Perhaps some that durst not destroy it, yet hid it there, out of ill will to the Jews, that they might lose the benefit of it. But Providence so ordered that it came to light; and it is here inserted, Ezr 6:3-5. 1. Here is a warrant for the building of the temple: Let the house of God at Jerusalem, yea, let that house be built (so it may be read), within such and such dimensions, and with such and such materials. 2. A warrant for the taking of the expenses of the building out of the king's revenue, Ezr 6:4. We do not find that they had received what was here ordered them, the face of things at court being soon changed. 3. A warrant for the restoring of the vessels and utensils of the temple, which Nebuchadnezzar had taken away (Ezr 6:5), with an order that the priests, the Lord's ministers, should return them all to their places in the house of God.
II. The confirmation of it by a decree of Darius, grounded upon it and in pursuance of it.
1.The decree of Darius is very explicit and satisfactory.
(1.)He forbids his officers to do any thing in opposition to the building of the temple. The manner of expression intimates that he knew they had a mind to hinder it: Be you far hence (Ezr 6:6); let the work of this house of God alone, Ezr 6:7. Thus was the wrath of the enemy made to praise God and the remainder thereof did he restrain.
(2.)He orders them out of his own revenue to assist the builders with money, [1.] For carrying on the building, Ezr 6:8. Herein he pursues the example of Cyrus, Ezr 6:4. [2.] For maintaining the sacrifices there when it was built, Ezr 6:9. He ordered that they should be supplied with every thing they wanted both for burnt-offerings and meat-offerings. He was content it should be a rent-charge upon his revenue, and ordered it to be paid every day, and this without fail, that they might offer sacrifices and prayers with them (for the patriarchs, when they offered sacrifice, called on the name of the Lord, so did Samuel, Elijah, and others) for the life (that is, the happiness and prosperity) of the king and his sons, Ezr 6:10. See here how he gives honour, First, To Israel's God, whom he calls once and again the God of heaven. Secondly, To his ministers, in ordering his commissioners to give out supplies for the temple service at the appointment of the priests. Those that thought to control them must now be, in this matter, at their command. It was a new thing for God's priests to have such an interest in the public money. Thirdly, To prayer: That they may pray for the life of the king. He knew they were a praying people, and had heard that God was nigh to them in all that which they called upon him for. He was sensible he needed their prayers and might receive benefit by them, and was kind to them in order that he might have an interest in their prayers. It is the duty of God's people to pray for those that are in authority over them, not only for the good and gentle, but also for the forward; but they are particularly bound in gratitude to pray for their protectors and benefactors; and it is the wisdom of princes to desire their prayers, and to engage them. Let not the greatest princes despise the prayers of the meanest saints; it is desirable to have them for us, and dreadful to have them against us.
(3.)He enforces his decree with a penalty (Ezr 6:11): "Let none either oppose the work and service of the temple or withhold the supports granted to it by the crown upon pain of death. If any alter this decree, let him be (hanged before his own door as we say), hanged upon a beam of his own house, and, as an execrable man, let his house be made a dunghill."
(4.)He entails a divine curse upon all those kings and people that should ever have any hand in the destruction of this house, Ezr 6:12. What he would not do himself for the protection of the temple he desired that God, to whom vengeance belongs, would do. This bespeaks him zealous in the cause; and though this temple was, at length, most justly destroyed by the righteous hand of God, yet perhaps the Romans, who were the instruments of that destruction, felt the effects of this curse, for that empire sensibly declined ever after.
2.From all this we learn, (1.) That the heart of kings is in the hand of God, and he turns it which way soever he pleases; what they are he makes them to be, for he is King of kings. (2.) That when God's time has come for the accomplishing of his gracious purposes concerning his church he will raise up instruments to promote them from whom such good service was not expected. The earth sometimes helps the woman (Rev 12:16), and those are made use of for the defence of religion who have little religion themselves. (3.) That what is intended for the prejudice of the church has often, by the overruling providence of God, been made serviceable to it, Phi 1:12. The enemies of the Jews, in appealing to Darius, hoped to get an order to suppress them, but, instead of that, they got an order to supply them. Thus out of the eater comes forth meat. The apocryphal Esdras (or Ezra), Book 1 ch. 3 and 4, gives another account of this decree in favour of the Jews, that Darius had vowed that if ever he came to the kingdom he would build the temple at Jerusalem, and that Zerubbabel, who was one of his attendants (whereas it is plain here that he was now at Jerusalem), for making an ingenious discourse before him on that subject (Great is the truth and will prevail), was told to ask what recompence he would, and asked only for this order, in pursuance of the king's vow.
Therefore, a decree was established by me, etc. The sense of the letter is clear: because he wished to impose the most severe punishment, if anyone attempted to change the decree of his religion; that is, the loss of everything he could possess and his soul, which he would lose even confined to a cross, with the torment of prolonged suffering. The spiritual understanding is also clear, because our works are all compared to wood: good indeed to fruitful trees, but bad to barren and worthy of fire. The wood is taken from his house, who tried to oppose the Lord's burnt offerings; and it is raised, and he himself is nailed to it, when the works of those who resist the peace of the universal holy Church are manifest to all as useless and perverse; and they are shown to have sought not the joy of life in these works, but rather a snare of death. The house of such people is also made public, that is, written into public record, when even their bodies in which they remained longer in this life are handed over to the most savage exactors to be punished perpetually at the resurrection, that is, to spirits. However, Darius rightly and faithfully desires that his decree be confirmed with the help of divine power, as he abruptly adds in prayer, saying: "May the God who caused His name to dwell there scatter all kingdoms and people who stretch out their hand to oppose and destroy that house of God which is in Jerusalem."
Continue studying Ezra 6:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Ezra 6:11 records a formidable decree issued by King Darius I of Persia, unequivocally affirming the royal mandate for the rebuilding of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. This verse details exceptionally severe penalties for any individual who would dare to obstruct, alter, or interfere with the king's command regarding the sacred temple project, thereby underscoring the absolute authority backing the divine work and the king's commitment to its completion.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Ezra 6:11 employs several powerful Literary Devices to convey the absolute authority and severe consequences of Darius's decree. The most prominent is Hyperbole, where the extreme nature of the punishment—dismantling one's house, using its timber for execution, and turning the remainder into a dunghill—is used to emphasize the gravity of the offense and the king's unwavering resolve. This exaggeration serves as a potent Deterrent, designed to instill fear and prevent any future interference with the temple project. The verse also uses powerful Symbolism: the "timber pulled down from his house" symbolizes the self-destruction and ironic reversal of fortune for those who oppose God's work, as their own security becomes their undoing. The "dunghill" is a stark symbol of utter disgrace, defilement, and public contempt, ensuring that the offender's legacy is one of impurity and rejection. The formal, declarative tone of the "decree" itself reflects Legal Language and the absolute nature of a Royal Edict, leaving no room for negotiation or misunderstanding.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Ezra 6:11 provides a powerful testament to God's unwavering commitment to His purposes and His sovereign hand in orchestrating human affairs, even through the decrees of pagan kings. The severity of Darius's edict, far from being merely a display of human tyranny, serves as a dramatic illustration of how God can use earthly authorities to protect and advance His divine agenda. It underscores the seriousness with which God views any opposition to His work, whether it comes from human adversaries or spiritual forces. This verse reminds us that God is actively involved in history, ensuring that His plans for His people and His kingdom will ultimately prevail, even against formidable obstacles. It encourages believers to trust in God's providence, knowing that He will defend His church and ensure the completion of His redemptive work, just as He protected the rebuilding of His temple.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While we no longer live under the direct decrees of Persian kings, Ezra 6:11 offers profound spiritual lessons for believers today. It calls us to reflect on the absolute sovereignty of God, who is able to use any means, even the stern decrees of secular rulers, to accomplish His will. This should instill in us a deep confidence that God's purposes for His church and His kingdom will ultimately prevail, regardless of the opposition we face. It also serves as a sobering reminder of the seriousness with which God views interference with His work. For us, this means faithfully participating in the building of God's spiritual temple—the Church—through evangelism, discipleship, and service, knowing that our labor is not in vain and that God Himself protects His work. It challenges us to examine our own hearts for any attitudes or actions that might inadvertently "alter" or obstruct God's will in our lives or communities, encouraging us to align ourselves fully with His divine purposes and trust in His protective hand.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Darius's decree so exceptionally harsh, particularly the part about the house becoming a dunghill?
Answer: Darius's decree was exceptionally harsh for several reasons, reflecting both Persian imperial policy and the profound importance of the temple project. First, it underscored the absolute and unalterable nature of a royal edict in the Persian Empire; any deviation was seen as a direct challenge to the king's authority. Second, the severity was intended as a powerful deterrent to ensure no one would dare to interfere with the temple's rebuilding again, after previous delays. Third, the specific punishments—being hanged on timber from one's own house and having the house turned into a dunghill—were designed for maximum public humiliation, disgrace, and defilement. Making a house a "dunghill" meant it was rendered permanently uninhabitable, ritually impure, and a public monument to the offender's ignominy, serving as a lasting warning to others about the dire consequences of opposing the king's (and implicitly, God's) will. This extreme measure highlights the strategic importance Darius placed on maintaining order and fulfilling imperial decrees, especially those concerning religious structures that could affect regional stability and the king's reputation, as seen in Ezra 6.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Ezra 6:11, with its severe penalties for those who would "alter" the decree and its mention of being "hanged on timber," finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Testament. The image of one being "hanged thereon" powerfully foreshadows the ultimate execution of Jesus Christ, who was "hanged on a tree" (Acts 5:30; Galatians 3:13), bearing the curse of the Law for humanity. While Darius's decree brought judgment upon those who opposed the building of a physical temple, Christ's crucifixion was the ultimate act of God's justice and mercy, where He bore the "dunghill" of our sin and shame, becoming a curse for us so that we might become the righteousness of God (2 Corinthians 5:21). Furthermore, just as Darius's decree protected the rebuilding of the physical temple, God's ultimate purpose is to build His spiritual temple, the Church, of which Christ is the cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20-22). Any attempt to "alter" God's ultimate "word"—His Son, Jesus Christ, and the gospel message—will face eternal consequences, for Christ is the unalterable truth and the final revelation of God's will (Hebrews 1:1-3). The severity of judgment in Ezra 6:11 thus points to the even greater judgment awaiting those who reject or pervert the work of God in Christ, who is the true temple and the one through whom all of God's purposes are perfectly fulfilled.