TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 2:1–35.
We may observe here, 1. That an account was kept in writing of the families that came up out of captivity, and the numbers of each family. This was done for their honour, as part of their recompence for their faith and courage, their confidence in God and their affection to their own land, and to stir up others to follow their good example. Those that honour God he will thus honour. The names of all those Israelites indeed that accept the offer of deliverance by Christ shall be found, to their honour, in a more sacred record than this, even in the Lamb's book of life. The account that was kept of the families that came up from the captivity was intended also for the benefit of posterity, that they might know from whom they descended and to whom they were allied. 2. That they are called children of the province. Judah, which had been an illustrious kingdom, to which other kingdoms had been made provinces, subject to it and dependent on it, was now itself made a province, to receive laws and commissions from the king of Persia and to be accountable to him. See how sin diminishes and debases a nation, which righteousness would exalt. But by thus being made servants (as the patriarchs by being sojourners in a country which was theirs by promise) they were reminded of the better country, that is, the heavenly (Heb 11:16), a kingdom which cannot be moved, or changed into a province. 3. That they are said to come every one to his city, that is, the city appointed them, in which appointment an eye, no doubt, was had to their former settlement by Joshua; and to that, as near as might be, they returned: for it does not appear that any others, at least any that were able to oppose them, had possessed them in their absence. 4. That the leaders are first mentioned, v. 2. Zerubbabel and Jeshua were their Moses and Aaron, the former their chief prince, the latter their chief priest. Nehemiah and Mordecai are mentioned here; some think not the same with the famous men we afterwards meet with of those names: probably they were the same, but afterwards returned to court for the service of their country. 5. Some of these several families are named from the persons that were their ancestors, others from the places in which they had formerly resided; as with us many surnames are the proper names of persons, others of places. 6. Some little difference there is between the numbers of some of the families here and in Neh. 7, where this catalogue is repeated, which might arise from this, that some who had given in their names at first to come afterwards drew back - said, I go, Sir, but went not, which would lessen the number of the families they belonged to; others that declined, at first, afterwards repented and went, and so increased the number. 7. Here are two families that are called the children of Elam (one Ezr 2:7, another Ezr 2:31), and, which is strange, the number of both is the same, 1254. 8. The children of Adonikam, which signifies a high lord, were 666, just the number of the beast (Rev 13:18), which is there said to be the number of a man, which, Mr. Hugh Broughton thinks, has reference to this man. 9. The children of Bethlehem (Ezr 2:21) were but 123, though it was David's city; for Bethlehem was little among the thousands of Judah, yet there must the Messiah arise, Mic 5:2. 10. Anathoth had been a famous place in the tribe of Benjamin and yet here it numbered but 128 (v. 23), which is to be imputed to the divine curse which the men of Anathoth brought upon themselves by persecuting Jeremiah, who was of their city. Jer 11:21, Jer 11:23, There shall be no remnant of them, for I will bring evil upon the men of Anathoth. And see Isa 10:30, O poor Anathoth! Nothing brings ruin on a people sooner than persecution.
Continue studying Ezra 2:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ezra 2:20, "The children of Gibbar, ninety and five," is a precise entry within the comprehensive census of the initial wave of Jewish exiles returning to Judah from Babylonian captivity. This verse, characteristic of Ezra 2, functions as an indispensable record, meticulously identifying a specific family group and their numerical strength among those who responded to Cyrus's decree. It profoundly underscores the divine and human meticulousness involved in accounting for every individual and family participating in the monumental task of re-establishing the community, rebuilding Jerusalem, and restoring the worship of God in the post-exilic era, serving as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in orchestrating His people's return.
Context
Literary Context
Ezra 2 presents an exhaustive genealogical and numerical list of the first contingent of exiles who journeyed back to Judah under the leadership of Zerubbabel and Jeshua. This chapter immediately follows the pivotal decree of Cyrus (as detailed in Ezra 1) and precedes the foundational accounts of the rebuilding of the altar and the laying of the Temple's cornerstone (found in Ezra 3). The meticulous detail, encompassing specific family names, ancestral towns, and precise numerical counts, serves to unequivocally establish the legitimacy, identity, and tribal affiliation of the returning community. It functions as a foundational roster for the nascent society, ensuring proper tribal allocations, validating land claims, and, critically, confirming the eligibility of priests and Levites for sacred Temple service. Verse 20, with its entry for "The children of Gibbar, ninety and five," exemplifies the exhaustive and indispensable nature of this historical and theological record.
Historical & Cultural Context
The return from Babylonian exile represented a watershed moment in Israelite history, marking the fulfillment of prophetic promises of restoration after seventy years of captivity (e.g., Jeremiah 29:10). The benevolent decree issued by Cyrus the Great, emperor of the Persian Empire, granted the Jews permission to return to their ancestral homeland and reconstruct their sacred Temple (a decree explicitly recorded in Ezra 1:2-4). For a people who had endured profound displacement, the loss of their land, and the disruption of their cherished religious practices, the re-establishment of identity through meticulously preserved lineage and family records was paramount. Such lists were far more than mere administrative documents; they were foundational for re-instituting the social, religious, and economic structures vital for their national and spiritual survival. Knowing one's ancestral town and family group was essential for legitimate land ownership, claiming tribal inheritance, and participating in the sacred duties and communal life of the restored nation.
Key Themes
Ezra 2:20, embedded within this exhaustive enumeration, contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Providence and Meticulous Care. While seemingly a dry compilation of names and numbers, every single entry, including that of the children of Gibbar, signifies God's precise, personal, and sovereign involvement in the restoration of His covenant people. He knows each individual and orchestrates their return with purposeful intent. Secondly, the recurring emphasis on "children of" and the precise numerical counts reinforces the profound theme of Identity and Continuity. After generations spent in exile, maintaining and affirming Israelite identity was absolutely crucial for the continuity of God's covenant people and their unique relationship with Him. The list validated their heritage and their rightful claim to the land. Finally, these individuals collectively formed the Foundation for Rebuilding. Each family unit, regardless of its size, represented a vital human resource for the monumental tasks ahead: the reconstruction of Jerusalem's city walls, the sacred Temple, and the spiritual life of the nation, as vividly detailed in the subsequent chapters outlining these reconstruction efforts (e.g., Ezra 3 and Nehemiah 4).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the root בָּנָה (banah), meaning "to build," this term signifies a "son" or "child" in the broadest sense, encompassing literal and figurative relationships. In the context of Ezra 2:20, "children" emphasizes lineage and the continuity of the family unit. It highlights that the returning exiles were not merely an amorphous mass but distinct family lines, each contributing to the rebuilding of the community, much as a son builds up the family name and legacy. This term underscores the importance of generational continuity in God's covenant plan for Israel.
This proper noun, appearing uniquely in Ezra 2:20 in the KJV, is derived from a root meaning "to be strong" or "mighty," often associated with "mighty man" or "hero." As a personal or family name, it designates a specific clan. Scholarly discussion often notes its parallel in Nehemiah 7:25, where the corresponding entry is "Gibeon." This suggests that "Gibbar" may be a textual variant, an alternative name, or a designation for a family associated with the well-known city of Gibeon. Regardless of the precise etymological or textual nuance, its inclusion signifies a distinct, identifiable family unit participating in the return from exile.
Verse Breakdown
"The children of Gibbar"
This clause serves as the primary identifier for a specific family or clan unit participating in the return from Babylonian exile. In ancient Israelite society, lineage, denoted by "children of" (or "sons of"), was absolutely paramount for establishing identity, validating inheritance claims, and determining social standing. For the returning exiles, this ancestral link was particularly critical, as their right to re-occupy land and participate fully in the restored community depended on their verifiable ancestral ties. The name "Gibbar" thus functions as the unique identifier for this particular group, distinguishing them within the extensive census.
"ninety and five"
This numerical count provides the precise number of individuals belonging to the family of Gibbar who made the arduous journey back to Judah. The inclusion of such precise numbers throughout Ezra 2 underscores the meticulous and administrative nature of the census. It was not a rough estimate but a careful, perhaps even divinely orchestrated, accounting. This precision was likely for practical purposes such as allocating resources for the rebuilding efforts, assigning specific tasks for reconstruction, and ensuring the accurate re-establishment of tribal territories. This specific, relatively small number highlights that even smaller family units contributed tangibly and significantly to the overall restoration effort.
Literary Devices
Ezra 2, and consequently verse 20, predominantly employs the literary device of Catalog or List. This extensive and meticulous enumeration of names, places, and numerical figures serves a profound historical, administrative, and theological purpose. It represents a deliberate and systematic presentation of data, emphasizing the comprehensive scope of the return and the underlying divine orchestration. The sheer volume and specificity of the names and numbers create a powerful sense of Verisimilitude, lending an undeniable authenticity and weight to the historical account. Furthermore, the Repetition of the formula "the children of [name], [number]" throughout the chapter is not merely stylistic; it reinforces the crucial themes of identity, continuity, and the individual significance of each family unit in the re-establishment of the nation. While seemingly dry, this literary choice transforms a simple list into a compelling testament to God's faithfulness in gathering His scattered people and the collective human effort involved in rebuilding His covenant community.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Ezra 2:20, though a single line in a lengthy census, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous care for His people and the inherent significance of every individual within His overarching redemptive plan. It serves as a powerful reminder that God's work of restoration is not a broad, impersonal act, but one characterized by careful and personal attention to each person and family unit. Just as He knew the "children of Gibbar" by name and number, He intimately knows and values every single member of His covenant community today. This verse speaks to the enduring importance of identity within God's people and the vital role of collective effort in fulfilling His divine purposes, whether in ancient Israel or the global church. It underscores the profound truth that even seemingly insignificant details are integral components of God's grand narrative of faithfulness, renewal, and the gathering of His elect.
Reflection and Application
The inclusion of Ezra 2:20 and similar entries in the sacred biblical record serves as a profound and enduring reminder that every individual, regardless of how seemingly small, obscure, or numerically insignificant, is intimately known, deeply valued, and purposefully involved by God. In a world that frequently measures worth by prominence, power, or public acclaim, this verse quietly but powerfully asserts that God's unwavering attention extends to the "ninety and five" of a family like Gibbar, just as much as it does to the most celebrated leaders. It invites us to deeply consider our own unique place within God's grand, unfolding story, recognizing that our individual contributions, however humble or unseen, are absolutely essential for the building up of His eternal kingdom. We are called to wholeheartedly embrace our identity in Christ and to find our true belonging within the vibrant, diverse community of faith, contributing our unique gifts, talents, and very presence to the collective work of God, trusting implicitly that He sees, purposes, and orchestrates every detail of our lives for His glory.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of the name "Gibbar" and its textual variant?
The name "Gibbar" (Hebrew: Gibbâr, often associated with meanings like "mighty man" or "hero") appears exclusively in Ezra 2:20 within the KJV. Its primary significance lies in its function as a specific family identifier within the comprehensive census of Jewish exiles returning from Babylon. However, a crucial point of scholarly interest arises from its parallel entry in Nehemiah 7:25, where the corresponding family is listed as "Gibeon," with the exact same numerical count of 95 individuals. This strong correspondence suggests that "Gibbar" in Ezra 2:20 is most likely a textual variant, a scribal difference, or perhaps an alternative designation for the family associated with the well-known Benjaminite city of Gibeon. Such variations are not uncommon in ancient manuscripts and do not undermine the overall historical accuracy or theological integrity of the census. Instead, they highlight the complexities of textual transmission and the value of comparing parallel passages to gain a more complete understanding. The core message remains that a distinct and identifiable family unit, whether known as Gibbar or Gibeon, was faithfully accounted for in God's sovereign plan for the restoration of His people.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The meticulous accounting of families like the "children of Gibbar" in Ezra 2:20 serves as a profound foreshadowing of the ultimate and complete gathering of God's people in and through Jesus Christ. Just as God faithfully orchestrated the return of His scattered exiles to Jerusalem, so too does Christ, the true and Good Shepherd, gather His elect from every nation, tribe, people, and tongue (a reality powerfully prophesied in Isaiah 43:5-7 and gloriously fulfilled throughout the New Testament). The profound emphasis on identity, lineage, and belonging in Ezra's ancient census finds its spiritual and eternal culmination in the church, the very body of Christ, where believers are no longer primarily defined by earthly lineage, national origin, or geographical location, but by their new birth and spiritual identity in Him (as beautifully articulated in Galatians 3:28). Each individual, known by God even before the foundation of the world (as described in Ephesians 1:4-5), is a vital, irreplaceable member of this new covenant community. The physical restoration of Israel from exile thus points to the far greater spiritual restoration and reconciliation accomplished through the atoning work of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, who actively builds His church, brick by living brick (as seen in 1 Peter 2:4-5), into a vibrant, spiritual temple for the eternal glory of God.