Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Shallum H7967, Amariah H568, and Joseph H3130.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Shalum, Amaryah and Yosef; and
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.
Ask
American Standard Version
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Shallum, Amariah, Ioseph.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,295 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 10:42 concludes a lengthy roster of individuals from various priestly, Levitical, and lay families who had taken foreign wives and were now publicly committing to put them away as part of a solemn covenant of repentance and spiritual purification. This concise verse, listing Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph, serves as a powerful testament to the personal and communal commitment required to restore Israel's covenant fidelity and distinct identity before God, underscoring the painful yet necessary steps taken to address the pervasive sin of intermarriage that threatened the very fabric and spiritual integrity of the post-exilic community.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezra 10:42 is strategically positioned at the very end of a comprehensive list of men (Ezra 10:25-43) who had committed the sin of intermarriage with foreign women. This list represents the culmination of a deeply emotional and transformative period in the post-exilic community's journey of spiritual restoration. Following Ezra's profound prayer of confession and lament in Ezra 9, the people, led by Shecaniah, made a solemn covenant to separate themselves from their foreign wives and children (Ezra 10:1-5). The preceding verses meticulously detail the process: a national assembly was convened (Ezra 10:6-9), a commission was appointed to investigate each case (Ezra 10:10-17), and finally, the names of those who had intermarried were meticulously recorded, starting with the priests and Levites (Ezra 10:18-24) and continuing with the lay Israelites. Ezra 10:42, therefore, provides the final three names in this extensive register, signifying the completion of a painful yet vital act of communal repentance and purification, bringing the chapter to its definitive and resolute conclusion.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The return from Babylonian exile, chronicled in the book of Ezra, marked a pivotal moment for the Jewish people. They were a fragile remnant, tasked with the monumental responsibility of rebuilding not just the physical temple but also their national and spiritual identity. God's law, particularly the explicit prohibition against intermarriage with pagan nations (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4), was designed not as racial prejudice but as a spiritual safeguard. Its purpose was to preserve Israel's distinctiveness as a holy nation set apart for Yahweh, preventing the spiritual danger of idolatry and syncretism that foreign wives and their gods would inevitably introduce. This very compromise had historically led Israel astray and ultimately contributed to the devastating exile from which they had just returned (1 Kings 11:1-8). The act of putting away foreign wives, though culturally shocking and personally agonizing, was viewed as a necessary, drastic measure to prevent a relapse into idolatry and to ensure the spiritual survival and purity of the covenant community in a hostile, polytheistic world.
  • Key Themes: Ezra 10:42, as the concluding entry in a list of repentance, powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Ezra and the broader post-exilic narrative. Foremost is the theme of Covenant Fidelity and Purity. The widespread intermarriage represented a direct and egregious violation of God's covenant and a profound threat to the spiritual distinctiveness of Israel as a holy people. The drastic measures taken, culminating in this list, highlight the community's unwavering commitment to restoring and maintaining their purity before God, ensuring they remained a people set apart for His purposes. This ties seamlessly into the theme of Repentance and Obedience, demonstrating that true repentance involves not merely confession of sin but decisive, costly action and personal sacrifice to align one's life fully with God's commands. The meticulous listing of names, including Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph, underscores the theme of Accountability, both individual and communal, within the covenant community. It emphasizes that the restoration of God's people required a comprehensive and often painful reckoning with sin, ensuring that the bitter lessons of the exile regarding the consequences of disobedience (as seen in Jeremiah 25:11) were truly learned and acted upon for the sake of future generations.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Shallum (Hebrew, Shallûwm', H7967): This name, derived from a root meaning "peace" or "recompense," signifies "peace" or "retribution." While its meaning isn't directly tied to the narrative of Ezra 10:42, its common usage in the Old Testament for various individuals, including kings and prominent figures, indicates a recognized Israelite name. In this context, the name's meaning could ironically highlight the disruption of peace caused by sin and the painful, yet ultimately peace-bringing, path to true reconciliation with God through obedience.
  • Amariah (Hebrew, ʼĂmaryâh', H568): Meaning "Jah has said" or "Yahweh has promised," this name is a powerful theological affirmation. It serves as a subtle, yet profound, reminder of God's unchanging word and promises, which stood in stark contrast to the people's disobedience regarding intermarriage. The very act of this individual being listed in the context of repentance implies a return to heeding and obeying what "Yahweh has said," acknowledging His sovereign word as the ultimate authority.
  • Joseph (Hebrew, Yôwçêph', H3130): Meaning "He (God) will add" or "may He add," this name, famously borne by Jacob's son, carries connotations of increase, blessing, and divine providence. In the context of Ezra 10:42, its inclusion might subtly suggest the hope that, through this painful act of purification and renewed obedience, God would once again add to and bless His people, restoring their spiritual vitality, growth, and numbers in the land.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Shallum": The first name listed in this concluding trio. His inclusion signifies his personal participation in the communal act of repentance and separation from foreign wives. As one of the final names, it underscores the comprehensive nature of the purge, reaching individuals across various families and ensuring no one, regardless of social standing or family origin, was overlooked in this critical spiritual restoration.
  • "Amariah": The second name, further emphasizing the breadth of the problem and the depth of the solution. His presence on this list highlights that the sin of intermarriage was widespread, affecting many families and households throughout the community. It underscores that the call to repentance was universal within the community, requiring a broad, unified, and decisive response from all who had transgressed the covenant.
  • "[and] Joseph": The final name in the entire register of those who had intermarried. The bracketed "and" in the KJV indicates it was added for English readability and is not present in the original Hebrew, which simply lists the names consecutively, creating a sense of finality. Joseph's inclusion marks the absolute completion of the arduous process of identifying and publicly acknowledging those who needed to take corrective action, bringing the list, and effectively the resolution of this specific crisis of intermarriage, to a definitive close within the narrative of Ezra.

Literary Devices

Ezra 10:42, though remarkably brief, employs several significant literary devices that amplify its impact. Its primary function is through Enumeration, serving as the final entry in a long, meticulously detailed list of names (Ezra 10:25-43). This enumeration is not merely a record-keeping exercise; it provides a concrete, undeniable, and public record of the individuals who participated in the solemn act of repentance and separation. The sheer volume of names presented across these verses, culminating in this final trio, powerfully underscores the pervasive nature of the sin of intermarriage within the community, demonstrating its widespread impact. The act of listing itself also functions as a potent form of Public Accountability, demonstrating that the commitment to the covenant and the act of purification were not merely private spiritual decisions but communal, verifiable acts with real-world consequences. Furthermore, the names, though seemingly mundane, function as a form of Synecdoche, where these three individuals—Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph—stand in for the entire group of men who made this painful sacrifice, representing the collective resolve and painful obedience of the post-exilic community to purify itself before God.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 10:42, as the conclusion of a difficult and painful list, powerfully reinforces the theological imperative for God's people to maintain spiritual distinctiveness and purity. The drastic measures taken to separate from foreign wives underscore the gravity of covenant disobedience and the profound consequences of spiritual compromise. This act was not merely about social or ethnic separation but about preserving the very identity of Israel as a holy nation, set apart for God's purposes, ensuring they would not repeat the idolatrous patterns that led to their exile. The names listed represent the individual cost of communal repentance, illustrating that true turning from sin often demands painful personal sacrifice to restore a right relationship with God and uphold the integrity of the covenant community. The meticulous record keeping highlights God's demand for thoroughness in repentance and His faithfulness to a people striving for holiness.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific cultural context of Ezra 10:42 and the command regarding intermarriage with foreign nations do not directly translate to New Covenant believers in the same literal way, the underlying principles of spiritual purity, uncompromising obedience, and decisive repentance remain profoundly relevant for the church today. This verse challenges us to consider what "foreign influences" or "unequal yokes" might be subtly compromising our spiritual integrity and distinctiveness as followers of Christ. It calls us to examine areas where we might be allowing the world's values, desires, or practices to subtly erode our devotion to Christ and our identity as His set-apart people. The painful, public act of separation recorded here reminds us that genuine repentance often requires costly, tangible steps to turn away from sin and align our lives fully with God's revealed will, even when it means going against popular opinion, personal comfort, or deeply ingrained habits. It is a call to radical obedience and a commitment to maintaining the purity and holiness of the church, the very body of Christ, in a world that constantly seeks to conform us to its image.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "foreign influences" or "unequal yokes" in my life might be compromising my spiritual purity and devotion to God, hindering my distinctiveness as a believer?
  • Am I willing to take costly, decisive steps of repentance when confronted with sin, even if it involves significant personal sacrifice or discomfort?
  • How does my commitment to God's Word manifest in practical, tangible ways in my daily life, especially when it challenges prevailing cultural norms or personal preferences?
  • In what ways can I actively contribute to the spiritual purity, holiness, and distinctiveness of my local church community, reflecting Christ's character to the world?

FAQ

Why are these specific names listed in Ezra 10:42, and what is their significance?

Answer: Ezra 10:42 lists Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph as the final three names in a comprehensive register of men who had taken foreign wives and were now publicly committing to put them away. Their significance lies not in any unique individual action, but in their inclusion as part of a collective act of national repentance and purification. The meticulous listing of names throughout Ezra 10:25-43 underscores the widespread nature of the sin of intermarriage and the thoroughness of the community's response. It highlights the individual accountability within the covenant community and the painful, personal sacrifice required to restore fidelity to God's commands. While the meanings of the names (Shallum: "peace," Amariah: "Yahweh has said," Joseph: "He will add") carry theological weight, they are not directly tied to the narrative of this verse but reflect common naming practices in ancient Israel, serving to concretize the reality of the repentance.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezra 10:42, with its stark depiction of a community undergoing painful purification to restore covenant fidelity, finds its ultimate fulfillment and transformation in Jesus Christ. The Old Covenant's emphasis on physical separation and ritual purity to maintain Israel's distinctiveness foreshadows the spiritual purity offered through Christ. While the people of Ezra's day had to put away foreign wives to prevent spiritual contamination and idolatry, believers in the New Covenant are called to a spiritual separation from the world, not through outward legalistic measures, but through the indwelling Holy Spirit and the transforming power of the gospel. Jesus Himself is the ultimate purifier, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, whose precious blood cleanses us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:7). The painful obedience of those listed in Ezra 10 points to Christ's perfect obedience, even to death on a cross (Philippians 2:8), which enables our repentance and reconciliation with God. The New Testament concept of not being unequally yoked with unbelievers shifts the focus from ethnic purity to spiritual alignment and shared faith, emphasizing that our identity as Christ's bride requires a commitment to holiness that flows from our union with Him, rather than from external regulations. Thus, the painful, yet necessary, purification in Ezra ultimately points to the perfect, complete, and gracious purification found in Christ, who establishes a new covenant community, purified by His blood and set apart for God's glory and eternal purposes.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44

The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–44. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 10:42 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.