Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 when there had been G1096 much G4183 disputing G4803, Peter G4074 rose up G450, and said G2036 unto G4314 them G846, Men G435 and brethren G80, ye G5210 know G1987 how that G3754 a good G744 while G2250 ago G575 God G2316 made choice G1586 among G1722 us G2254, that the Gentiles G1484 by G1223 my G3450 mouth G4750 should hear G191 the word G3056 of the gospel G2098, and G2532 believe G4100.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
After lengthy debate, Kefa got up and said to them, “Brothers, you yourselves know that a good while back, God chose me from among you to be the one by whose mouth the Goyim should hear the message of the Good News and come to trust.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
After much discussion, Peter got up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you that the Gentiles would hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe.
Ask
American Standard Version
And when there had been much questioning, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Brethren, ye know that a good while ago God made choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When there had been much discussion, Peter rose up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that a good while ago God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the nations should hear the word of the Good News, and believe.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when there had bene great disputation, Peter rose vp, and said vnto them, Ye men and brethren, ye know that a good while ago, among vs God chose out me, that the Gentiles by my mouth should heare the worde of the Gospel, and beleeue.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and there having been much disputing, Peter having risen up said unto them, `Men, brethren, ye know that from former days, God among us did make choice, through my mouth, for the nations to hear the word of the good news, and to believe;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1)
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1) View full PDF
Acts 15:1-20
Acts 15:1-20 View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,450 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 15:7 records a pivotal moment at the Jerusalem Council where, after intense debate regarding the inclusion of Gentiles into the Christian community, the Apostle Peter rises to deliver a decisive testimony. He reminds the gathered apostles and elders of God's sovereign choice to use him, a Jewish apostle, to bring the gospel message to the Gentiles, enabling them to hear and believe without requiring adherence to the Mosaic Law. This historical precedent, rooted in divine initiative, served as a foundational argument for the universal scope of salvation through faith in Christ.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the critical narrative of the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15, which convened to address a profound theological and practical dispute within the early church. The preceding verses (Acts 15:1-6) detail the arrival of certain Jewish believers from Judea who insisted that Gentile converts must be circumcised and observe the Law of Moses to be saved, directly contradicting the gospel preached by Paul and Barnabas. This contention led to "much disputing" (Acts 15:7), highlighting the gravity of the issue that threatened to fracture the nascent Christian movement along ethnic and theological lines. Peter's intervention, following this initial period of intense debate, marks a turning point in the council's deliberations, shifting the focus from human argument to divine revelation and historical precedent.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The early church was predominantly Jewish, emerging from a rich heritage of Mosaic Law, temple worship, and covenant identity. The inclusion of Gentiles, especially without requiring circumcision and adherence to Jewish customs, presented an unprecedented challenge to deeply ingrained cultural and religious norms. Circumcision, in particular, was the physical sign of the Abrahamic covenant, distinguishing Israel from the nations. For many Jewish believers, it was inconceivable that Gentiles could fully participate in God's covenant people without adopting this foundational mark of Jewish identity. This tension reflected the broader historical divide between Jews and Gentiles, marked by centuries of separation and distinct religious practices. The council's decision would set a precedent for the future mission and identity of the church, determining whether it would remain a sect within Judaism or become a universal movement open to all.
  • Key Themes: Peter's speech in Acts 15:7-11 powerfully contributes to several key themes pervasive in the book of Acts and the broader New Testament. Foremost is the Divine Initiative and Sovereignty in the spread of the gospel, emphasizing that God, not human preference or tradition, orchestrates the inclusion of all peoples. Peter explicitly states that "God made choice among us," underscoring His active role. This leads directly to the theme of the Inclusion of Gentiles into the covenant community, a radical departure from traditional Jewish exclusivity, affirming that salvation is not limited by ethnicity or adherence to ceremonial law. Peter's testimony also reinforces the central New Testament theme of Salvation by Grace Through Faith, as he recounts how Gentiles heard the gospel "by my mouth" and "believe," implying that their acceptance by God was based solely on faith in Christ, not on works of the Law. This aligns with the theological framework articulated by Paul in epistles like Ephesians 2:8-9 and Romans 3:28. Finally, Peter's personal experience with Cornelius, detailed in Acts 10, serves as a crucial Apostolic Witness and irrefutable evidence of God's acceptance of uncircumcised Gentiles, providing the necessary authority and precedent for the council's deliberations.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Disputing (Greek, syzētēsis', G4803): Derived from a verb meaning "to seek together" or "to discuss," this noun refers to "mutual questioning" or "discussion." In this context, it signifies a fervent and intense debate, underscoring the gravity and contention surrounding the issue of Gentile inclusion. It points to a period of earnest, perhaps even heated, theological reasoning and argument among the apostles and elders before Peter's intervention.
  • Made choice (Greek, eklégomai', G1586): This verb, meaning "to select" or "to choose out," is in the middle voice, emphasizing God's active, deliberate, and sovereign decision. Peter's use of this word highlights that the outreach to the Gentiles through his ministry was not a random event or a human initiative, but a specific, intentional act of divine election and purpose. It underscores God's ultimate authority in directing the course of salvation history.
  • Gentiles (Greek, éthnos', G1484): This term refers to a "race" or "tribe," and specifically in the New Testament, it denotes a foreign, non-Jewish people, often implying a pagan background. Its use here is crucial, as it identifies the very group whose status within the new covenant community is being debated. Peter's testimony affirms God's direct and intentional inclusion of these "nations" into the family of faith, without requiring them to become Jewish proselytes.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when there had been much disputing": This opening phrase immediately sets the scene, indicating a significant period of intense and perhaps contentious discussion among the apostles and elders. The issue at hand—whether Gentiles needed to be circumcised and follow the Mosaic Law to be saved—was not trivial but deeply divisive, leading to considerable theological and practical argument.
  • "Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men [and] brethren": Peter's action of "rising up" signifies his intention to speak with authority and to bring a definitive word to the assembly. His address, "Men and brethren," is a respectful and communal form of address, acknowledging the shared faith and fellowship of those gathered, despite the disagreement. It signals his intention to speak as one among them, yet with the weight of his apostolic experience.
  • "ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us": Peter appeals to their collective memory and shared understanding of past events. The phrase "a good while ago" refers to the significant period since his encounter with Cornelius (Acts 10). Crucially, he attributes the initiative not to himself or any human design, but to God, who "made choice" among the apostles to use him for a specific purpose. This immediately elevates the discussion from human opinion to divine decree.
  • "that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe": This clause reveals the specific purpose of God's choice: for the Gentiles to hear the "word of the gospel" through Peter's preaching and, as a result, to "believe." This highlights the essential elements of salvation: the proclamation of the good news (the gospel), its reception through hearing, and the response of faith. It implicitly argues that if God Himself enabled Gentiles to believe and receive salvation through hearing the gospel, then imposing additional requirements like circumcision would be contrary to His revealed will.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices. Apostolic Authority is evident in Peter's action of "rising up" and addressing the council, signaling his intention to speak with the weight of his experience as a leading apostle. His opening address, "Men and brethren," is a form of Rhetorical Appeal that seeks to unite the audience in shared understanding before presenting his argument. The core of his statement is a Historical Recounting, where Peter appeals to a specific past event (his ministry to Cornelius) as irrefutable evidence of God's will. This historical precedent functions as a powerful form of Argument by Example, demonstrating God's direct intervention and approval of Gentile inclusion without circumcision. Furthermore, the emphasis on "God made choice" underscores the theme of Divine Sovereignty, framing the entire event as part of God's overarching plan rather than a human innovation or concession. This invocation of divine agency lends immense weight to Peter's testimony, aiming to resolve the "much disputing" by appealing to a higher, unquestionable authority.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 15:7 stands as a monumental declaration of God's universal redemptive plan, transcending ethnic and cultural boundaries. Peter's testimony, rooted in his direct experience of God's Spirit falling upon uncircumcised Gentiles, fundamentally reorients the early church's understanding of salvation. It affirms that God's covenant promises, once seemingly confined to Israel, are now openly extended to all humanity through faith in Jesus Christ, without the prerequisite of adherence to the Mosaic Law. This pivotal moment underscores the New Covenant's emphasis on an inward transformation of the heart by the Spirit, rather than outward adherence to ritualistic practices. It foreshadows the global mission of the church, demonstrating that God's desire is for all nations to hear and believe the gospel, forming one new humanity in Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Peter's powerful testimony in Acts 15:7 serves as a profound reminder for the church in every age: God's redemptive work is expansive, inclusive, and often challenges our preconceived notions and traditions. Just as the early church grappled with the radical inclusion of Gentiles, we too must continually examine whether our practices, doctrines, or cultural assumptions create unnecessary barriers to the gospel. This verse calls us to humbly discern God's active leading in our time, recognizing that His Spirit continues to move in unexpected ways, bringing people from diverse backgrounds into His kingdom. It encourages us to prioritize the core message of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, ensuring that human-made requirements do not overshadow the simplicity and power of the gospel. Furthermore, it models a healthy approach to theological disagreement: engaging in "much disputing" with integrity and passion, but ultimately seeking divine wisdom through prayer, Scripture, and the testimony of God's work, leading to unity and clarity.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "disputing" or divisions exist within the church today that might be hindering the spread of the gospel?
  • How does Peter's emphasis on "God made choice" challenge our human-centric approaches to ministry and evangelism?
  • In what ways might we, consciously or unconsciously, be adding extra requirements for people to "belong" in our Christian communities, beyond simple faith in Christ?
  • How can we, like Peter, humbly share our experiences of God's work to help guide and unite the church in difficult conversations?

FAQ

What was the "much disputing" about that preceded Peter's speech?

Answer: The "much disputing" refers to the intense theological debate at the Jerusalem Council concerning whether Gentile converts to Christianity needed to be circumcised and observe the Mosaic Law to be saved. Certain Jewish believers, particularly those from the party of the Pharisees (Acts 15:5), insisted that these Old Covenant requirements were necessary for salvation and full inclusion in God's people. This was a direct challenge to the gospel preached by Paul and Barnabas, who had been seeing many Gentiles come to faith without adopting these practices.

Why was Peter's testimony so crucial in resolving the debate?

Answer: Peter's testimony was crucial because he had direct, undeniable experience of God's sovereign initiative in bringing the gospel to the Gentiles. His encounter with Cornelius's household (detailed in Acts 10) demonstrated that God had poured out the Holy Spirit on uncircumcised Gentiles, signifying their full acceptance and salvation, even before their baptism. This divine confirmation, witnessed by Peter and others, provided irrefutable proof that God Himself had "made choice" for the Gentiles to hear and believe the gospel by faith alone, without the need for circumcision or adherence to the Mosaic Law. His apostolic authority and personal witness carried immense weight, shifting the council's focus from human tradition to divine revelation.

Does this verse imply that the Mosaic Law is no longer relevant for believers?

Answer: Acts 15:7, in conjunction with the broader outcome of the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:19-21), indicates that Gentile believers are not bound by the ceremonial and ritualistic aspects of the Mosaic Law, such as circumcision, for salvation or acceptance. The council affirmed salvation by grace through faith in Christ. While the moral principles of the Law remain relevant as expressions of God's character and will, the ceremonial aspects that distinguished Israel from the nations were superseded by Christ's fulfillment. The focus shifted to the gospel of Christ as the sole means of salvation, accessible to all, Jew and Gentile alike, through faith. This liberation from the ceremonial law allowed the gospel to spread unhindered to the entire world.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 15:7, with Peter's powerful declaration, stands as a profound testament to the Christ-centered fulfillment of God's eternal purposes. Peter's recounting of God's choice to bring the gospel to the Gentiles through his mouth directly points to Jesus Christ as the universal Savior, the one who breaks down the dividing wall between Jew and Gentile (Ephesians 2:14). The "word of the gospel" that the Gentiles heard and believed is none other than the good news of salvation accomplished through Christ's sacrificial death and resurrection, a message intended for "all the ends of the earth" (Acts 1:8). This event at the Jerusalem Council, sparked by Peter's testimony, validates the New Covenant reality where salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus, not by adherence to the Law, perfectly aligning with Paul's consistent message in his epistles (e.g., Romans 3:21-26). Christ's work on the cross made it possible for people from "every tribe and language and people and nation" to be redeemed and brought into God's family (Revelation 5:9), fulfilling ancient prophecies of a Messiah who would be a light to the Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6). Peter's testimony in Acts 15:7 thus celebrates the liberating truth that in Christ, there is no longer Jew or Gentile, but all are one in Him (Galatians 3:28), united by faith in the Lamb of God.

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 15 verses 6–21

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here a council called, not by writ, but by consent, on this occasion (Act 15:6): The apostles and presbyters came together, to consider this matter. They did not give their judgment separately, but came together to do it, that they might hear one another's sense in this matter; for in the multitude of counsellors there is safety and satisfaction. They did not give their judgment rashly, but considered of this matter. Though they were clear concerning it in their own minds, yet they would take time to consider of it, and to hear what might be said by the adverse party. Nor did the apostles give their judgment concerning it without the elders, the inferior ministers, to whom they thus condescended, and on whom they thus put an honour. Those that are most eminent in gifts and graces, and are in the most exalted stations in the church, ought to show respect to their juniors and inferiors; for, though days should speak, yet there is a spirit in man, Job 32:7, Job 32:8. Here is a direction to the pastors of the churches, when difficulties arise, to come together in solemn meetings for mutual advice and encouragement, that they may know one another's mind, and strengthen one another's hands, and may act in concert. Now here we have,

I. Peter's speech in this synod. He did not in the least pretend to any primacy or headship in this synod. He was not master of this assembly, nor so much as chairman or moderator, pro hac vice - on this occasion; for we do not find that either he spoke first, to open the synod (there having been much disputing before he rose up), nor that he spoke last, to sum up the cause and collect the suffrages; but he was a faithful, prudent zealous member of this assembly, and offered that which was very much to the purpose, and which would come better from him than from another, because he had himself been the first that preached the gospel to the Gentiles. There had been much disputing, pro and con, upon this question, and liberty of speech allowed, as ought to be in such cases; those of the sect of the Pharisees were some of them present, and allowed to say what they could in defence of those of their opinion at Antioch, which probably was answered by some of the elders; such questions ought to be fairly disputed before they are decided. When both sides had been heard, Peter rose up, and addressed himself to the assembly, Men and brethren, as did James afterwards, Act 15:13. And here,

1.He put them in mind of the call and commission he had some time ago to preach the gospel to the Gentiles; he wondered there should be any difficulty made of a matter already settled: You know that aph' hēmerōn archaiōn - from the beginning of the days of the gospel, many years ago, God made choice among us apostles of one to preach the gospel to the Gentiles, and I was the person chosen, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word, and believe, Act 15:7. You know I was questioned about it and cleared myself to the universal satisfaction; every body rejoiced that God had granted to the Gentiles repentance unto life, and nobody said a word of circumcising them, nor was there any thought of such a thing. See Act 11:18. "Why should the Gentiles who hear the word of the gospel by Paul's mouth be compelled to submit to circumcision, any more than those that heard it by my mouth? Or why should the terms of their admission now be made harder than they were then?"

2.He puts them in mind how remarkably God owned him in preaching to the Gentiles, and gave testimony to their sincerity in embracing the Christian faith (Act 15:8): "God, who knows the hearts, and therefore is able to judge infallibly of men, bore them witness that they were his indeed, by giving them the Holy Ghost; not only the graces and comforts, but the extraordinary miraculous gifts of the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us apostles." See Act 11:15-17. Note, The Lord knows those that are his, for he knows men's hearts; and we are as our hearts are. Those to whom God gives the Holy Ghost, he thereby bears witness to that they are his; hence we are said to be sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise - marked for God. God had bidden the Gentiles welcome to the privilege of communion with him, without requiring them to be circumcised and to keep the law; and therefore shall not we admit them into communion with us but upon those terms? "God has put no difference between us and them (Act 15:9); they, though Gentiles, are as welcome to the grace of Christ and the throne of grace as we Jews are; why then should we set them at a distance, as if we were holier than they?" Isa 65:5. Note, We ought not to make any conditions of our brethren's acceptance with us but such as God has made the conditions of their acceptance with him, Rom 14:3. Now the Gentiles were fitted for communion with God, in having their hearts purified by faith, and that faith God's own work in them; and therefore why should we think them unfit for communion with us, unless they will submit to the ceremonial purifying enjoined by the law to us? Note, (1.) By faith the heart is purified; we are not only justified, and conscience purified, but the work of sanctification is begun and carried on. (2.) Those that have their hearts purified by faith are therein made so nearly to resemble one another, that, whatever difference there may be between them, no account is to be made of it; for the faith of all the saints is alike precious, and has like precious effects (Pe2 1:1), and those that by it are united to Christ are so to look upon themselves as joined to one another as that all distinctions, even that between Jew and Gentile, are merged and swallowed up in it.

3.He sharply reproves those teachers (some of whom, it is likely, were present) who went about to bring the Gentiles under the obligation of the law of Moses, Act 15:10. The thing is so plain that he cannot forbear speaking of it with some warmth: "Now therefore, since God has owned them for his, why tempt you God to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, of the believing Gentiles and their children" (for circumcision was a yoke upon their infant seed, who are here reckoned among the disciples), "a yoke which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?" Here he shows that in this attempt, (1.) They offered a very great affront to God: "You tempt him, by calling that in question which he has already settled and determined by no less an indication than that of the gift of the Holy Ghost; you do, in effect, ask, 'Did he know what he did? Or was he in earnest in it? Or will he abide by his own act?' Will you try whether God, who designed the ceremonial law for the people of the Jews only, will now, in its last ages, bring the Gentiles too under the obligation of it, to gratify you?" Those tempt God who prescribe to him, and say that people cannot be saved but upon such and such terms, which God never appointed; as if the God of salvation must come into their measures. (2.) They offered a very great wrong to the disciples: Christ came to proclaim liberty to the captives, and they go about to enslave those whom he has made free. See Neh 5:8. The ceremonial law was a heavy yoke; they and their fathers found it difficult to be borne, so numerous, so various, so pompous, were the institutions of it. The distinction of meats was a heavy yoke, not only as it rendered conversation less pleasant, but as it embarrassed conscience with endless scruples. The ado that was made about even unavoidable touch of a grave or a dead body, the pollution contracted by it, and the many rules about purifying from that pollution, were a heavy burden. This yoke Christ came to ease us of, and called those that were weary and heavy laden under it to come and take his yoke upon them, his easy yoke. Now for these teachers to go about to lay that yoke upon the neck of the Gentiles from which he came to free even the Jews was the greatest injury imaginable to them.

4.Whereas the Jewish teachers had urged that circumcision was necessary to salvation, Peter shows it was so far from being so that both Jews and Gentiles were to be saved purely through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in no other way (Act 15:11): We believe to be saved through that grace only; pisteuomen sōthēnai - We hope to be saved; or, We believe unto salvation in the same manner as they - kath' hon tropon kakeinoi̇ "We that are circumcised believe to salvation, and so do those that are uncircumcised; and, as our circumcision will be no advantage to us, so their uncircumcision will be no disadvantage to them; for we must depend upon the grace of Christ for salvation, and must apply that grace by faith, as well as they. There is not one way of salvation for the Jews and another for the Gentiles; neither circumcision avails any thing nor uncircumcision (that is neither here nor there), but faith which works by love, Gal 5:6. Why should we burden them with the law of Moses, as necessary to their salvation, when it is not that, but the gospel of Christ, that is necessary both to our salvation and theirs?"

II. An account of what Barnabas and Paul said in this synod, which did not need to be related, for they only gave in a narrative of what was recorded in the foregoing chapters, what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them, Act 15:12. This they had given in to the church at Antioch (Act 14:27), to their brethren by the way (Act 15:3), and now again to the synod; and it was very proper to be given in here. That which was contended for was that the Gentiles ought to submit to the law of Moses; now, in opposition to this, Paul and Barnabas undertake to show, by a plain relation of matters of fact, that God owned the preaching of the pure gospel to them without the law, and therefore to press the law upon them now was to undo what God had done. Observe, 1. What account they gave; they declared, or opened in order, and with all the magnifying and affecting circumstances, what glorious miracles, what signs and wonders, God had wrought among the Gentiles by them, what confirmation he had given to their preaching by miracles wrought in the kingdom of nature, and what success he had given to it by miracles wrought in the kingdom of grace. Thus God had honoured these apostles whom Jewish teachers condemned, and had thus honoured the Gentiles whom they contemned. What need had they of any other advocate when God himself pleaded their cause? The conversion of the Gentiles was itself a wonder, all things considered, no less than a miracle. Now if they received the Holy Ghost by the hearing of faith, why should they be embarrassed with the works of the law? See Gal 3:2. 2. What attention was given to them: All the multitude (who, though they had not voted, yet came together to hear what was said) kept silence, and gave audience to Paul and Barnabas; it should seem they took more notice of their narrative than they did of all the arguments that were offered. As in natural philosophy and medicine nothing is so satisfactory as experiments, and in law nothing is so satisfactory as cases adjudged, so in the things of God the best explication of the word of grace is the accounts given of the operations of the Spirit of grace; to these the multitude will with silence give audience. Those that fear God will most readily hear those that can tell them what God has done for their souls, or by their means, Psa 66:16.

III. The speech which James made to the synod. He did not interrupt Paul and Barnabas, though, it is likely, he had before heard their narrative, but let them go on with it, for the edification of the company, and that they might have it from the first and best hand; but, after they had held their peace, then James stood up. You may all prophesy one by one, Co1 14:31. God is the God of order. He let Paul and Barnabas say what they had to say, and then he made the application of it. The hearing of variety of ministers may be of use when one truth does not drive out, but clench, another.

1.He addresses himself respectfully to those present: "Men and brethren, hearken unto me. You are men, and therefore, it is to be hoped, will hear reason; you are my brethren, and therefore will hear me with candour. We are all brethren, and equally concerned in this cause that nothing be done to the dishonour of Christ and the uneasiness of Christians."

2.He refers to what Peter had said concerning the conversion of the Gentiles (Act 15:14): "Simeon" (that is, Simon Peter) "hath declared, and opened the matter to you - how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, in Cornelius and his friends, who were the first-fruits of the Gentiles-how, when the gospel began first to spread, presently the Gentiles were invited to come and take the benefit of it;" and James observes here, (1.) That the grace of God was the origin of it; it was God that visited the Gentiles; and it was a kind visit. Had they been left to themselves, they would never have visited him, but the acquaintance began on his part; he not only visited and redeemed his people, but visited and redeemed those that were lo ammi - not a people. (2.) that the glory of God was the end of it: it was to take out of them a people for his name, who should glorify him, and in whom he would be glorified. As of old he took the Jews, so now the Gentiles, to be to him for a name, and for a praise, and for a glory, Jer 13:11. Let all the people of God remember that therefore they are thus dignified in God, that God may be glorified in them.

3.He confirms this with a quotation out of the Old Testament: he could not prove the calling of the Gentiles by a vision, as Peter could, nor by miracles wrought by his hand, as Paul and Barnabas could, but he would prove that it was foretold in the Old Testament, and therefore it must be fulfilled, Act 15:15. To this agree the words of the prophets; most of the Old Testament prophets spoke more or less of the calling in of the Gentiles, even Moses himself, Rom 10:19. It was the general expectation of the pious Jews that the Messiah should be a light to enlighten the Gentiles (Luk 2:32): but James waives the more illustrious prophecies of this, and pitches upon one that seemed more obscure: It is written, Amo 9:11, Amo 9:12, where is foretold, (1.) The setting up of the kingdom of the Messiah (Act 15:16): I will raise up the tabernacle of David, that is fallen. The covenant was made with David and his seed; but the house and family of David are here called his tabernacle, because David in his beginning was a shepherd, and dwelt in tents, and his house, that had been as a stately palace, had become a mean and despicable tabernacle, reduced in a manner to its small beginning. This tabernacle was ruined and fallen down; there had not been for many ages a king of the house of David; the sceptre had departed from Judah, the royal family was sunk and buried in obscurity, and, as it should seem, not enquired after. But God will return, and will build it again, raise it out of its ruins, a phoenix out of its ashes; and this was now lately fulfilled, when our Lord Jesus was raised out of that family, had the throne of his father David given him, with a promise that he should reign over the house of Jacob for ever, Luk 1:32, Luk 1:33. And, when the tabernacle of David was thus rebuilt in Christ, all the rest of it was, not many years after, wholly extirpated and cut off, as was also the nation of the Jews itself, and all their genealogies were lost. The church of Christ may be called the tabernacle of David. This may sometimes be brought very low, and may seem to be in ruins, but it shall be built again, its withering interests shall revive; it is cast down, but not destroyed: even dry bones are made to live. (2.) The bringing in of the Gentiles as the effect and consequence of this (Act 15:17): That the residue of men might seek after the Lord; not the Jews only, who thought they had the monopoly of the tabernacle of David, but the residue of men, such as had hitherto been left out of the pale of the visible church; they must now, upon this re-edifying of the tabernacle of David, be brought to seek after the Lord, and to enquire how they may obtain his favour. When David's tabernacle is set up, they shall seek the Lord their God, and David their king, Hos 3:5; Jer 30:9. Then Israel shall possess the remnant of Edom (so it is in the Hebrew); but the Jews called all the Gentiles Edomites, and therefore the Septuagint leave out the particular mention of Edom, and read it just as it is here, that the residue of men might seek (James here adds, after the Lord), and all the Gentiles, or heathen, upon whom my name is called. The Jews were for many ages so peculiarly favoured that the residue of men seemed neglected; but now God will have an eye to them, and his name shall be called upon by the Gentiles; his name shall be declared and published among them, and they shall be brought both to know his name and to call upon it: they shall call themselves the people of God, and he shall call them so; and thus, by consent of both parties, his name is called upon them. This promise we may depend upon the fulfilling of in its season; and now it begins to be fulfilled, for it is added, saith the Lord, who doeth this; who doeth all these things (so the Seventy); and the apostle here: he saith it who doeth it, who therefore said it because he was determined to do it; and who therefore does it because he hath said it; for though with us saying and doing are two things they are not so with God. The uniting of Jews and Gentiles in one body, and all those things that were done in order to it, which were here foretold, were, [1.] What God did: This was the Lord's doing, whatever instruments were employed in it: and, [2.] It was what God delighted in, and was well pleased with; for he is the God of the Gentiles, as well as the Jews, and it is his honour to be rich in mercy to all that call upon him.

4.He resolves it into the purpose and counsel of God (Act 15:18): Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world. He not only foretold the calling of the Gentiles many ages ago by the prophets (and therefore it ought not to be a surprise or stumbling-block to us), but he foresaw and foreordained it in his eternal counsels, which are unquestionably wise and unalterably firm. It is an excellent maxim here laid down concerning all God's works, both of providence and grace, in the natural and spiritual kingdom, that they were all known unto him from the beginning of the world, from the time he first began to work, which supposes his knowing them (as other scriptures speak) from before the foundation of the world, and therefore from all eternity. Note, Whatever God does, he did before design and determine to do; for he works all, not only according to his will, but according to the counsel of his will: he not only does whatever he determined (Psa 135:6), which is more than we can do (our purposes are frequently broken off, and our measures broken), but he determined whatever he does. Whatever he may say, to prove us, he himself knows what he will do. We know not our works beforehand, but must do as occasion shall serve, Sa1 10:7. What we shall do in such or such a case we cannot tell till it comes to the setting to; but known unto God are all his works; in the volume of his book (called the scriptures of truth, Dan 10:21) they are all written in order, without any erasure or interlining (Psa 40:7); and all God's works will, in the day of review, be found to agree exactly with his counsels, without the least error or variation. We are poor short-sighted creatures; the wisest men can see but a little way before them, and not at all with any certainty; but this is our comfort, that, whatever uncertainty we are at, there is an infallible certainty in the divine prescience: known unto God are all his works.

5.He gives his advice what was to be done in the present case, as the matter now stood with reference to the Gentiles (Act 15:19): My sentence is; egō krinō - I give it as my opinion, or judgment; not as having authority over the rest, but as being an adviser with them. Now his advice is,

(1.)That circumcision and the observance of the ceremonial law be by no means imposed upon the Gentile converts; no, not so much as recommended nor mentioned to them. "There are many from among the Gentiles that are turned to God in Christ, and we hope there will be many more. Now I am clearly for using them with all possible tenderness, and putting no manner of hardship or discouragement upon them," mē parenochlein - "not to give them any molestation nor disturbance, nor suggest any thing to them that may be disquieting, or raise scruples in their minds, or perplex them." Note, Great care must be taken not to discourage nor disquiet young converts with matters of doubtful disputation. Let the essentials of religion, which an awakened conscience will readily receive, be first impressed deeply upon them, and these will satisfy them and make them easy; and let not things foreign and circumstantial be urged upon them, which will but trouble them. The kingdom of God, in which they are to be trained up, is not meat and drink, neither the opposition nor the imposition of indifferent things, which will but trouble them; but it is righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost, which we are sure will trouble nobody.

(2.)That yet it would be well that in some things, which gave most offence to the Jews, the Gentiles should comply with them. Because they must not humour them so far as to be circumcised, and keep the whole law, it does not therefore follow that they must act in a continual contradiction to them, and study how to provoke them. It will please the Jews (and, if a little thing will oblige them, better do so than cross them) if the Gentile converts abstain, [1.] From pollutions of idols, and from fornication, which are two bad things, and always to be abstained from; but writing to them particularly and expressly to abstain from them (because in these things the Jews were jealous of the Gentile converts, lest they should transgress) would very much gratify the Jews; not but that the apostles, both in preaching and writing to the Gentiles that embraced Christianity, were careful to warn against, First, Pollutions of idols, that they should have no manner of fellowship with idolaters in their idolatrous worships, and particularly not in the feasts they held upon their sacrifices. See Co1 10:14, etc.; Co2 6:14, etc. Secondly, Fornication, and all manner of uncleanness. How large, how pressing, is Paul in his cautions against this sin! Co1 6:9-15; Eph 5:3, etc. But the Jews, who were willing to think the worst of those they did not like, suggested that these were things in which the Gentiles, even after conversion, allowed themselves, and the apostle of the Gentiles connived at it. Now, to obviate this suggestion, and to leave no room for this calumny, James advises that, besides the private admonitions which were given them by their ministers, they should be publicly warned to abstain from pollutions of idols and from fornication - that herein they should be very circumspect, and should avoid all appearances of these two evils, which would be in so particular a manner offensive to the Jews. [2.] From things strangled, and from blood, which, though not evil in themselves, as the other two, nor designed to be always abstained fRom. as those were, had been forbidden by the precepts of Noah (Gen 9:4.), before the giving of the law of Moses; and the Jews had a great dislike to them, and to all those that took a liberty to use them; and therefore, to avoid giving offence, let the Gentile converts abridge themselves of their liberty herein, Co1 8:9, Co1 8:13. Thus we must become all things to all men.

6.He gives a reason for his advice - that great respect ought to be shown to the Jews for they have been so long accustomed to the solemn injunctions of the ceremonial law that they must be borne with, if they cannot presently come off from them (Act 15:21): For Moses hath of old those that preach him in every city, his writings (a considerable part of which is the ceremonial law) being read in the synagogues every sabbath day. "You cannot blame them if they have a great veneration for the law of Moses; for besides that they are very sure God spoke to Moses," (1.) "Moses is continually preached to them, and they are called upon to remember the law of Moses," Mal 4:4. Note, Even that word of God which is written to us should also be preached: those that have the scriptures have still need of ministers to help them to understand and apply the scriptures. (2.) "His writings are read in a solemn religious manner, in their synagogues, and on the sabbath day, in the place and at the time of their meetings for the worship of God; so that from their childhood they have been trained up in a regard to the law of Moses; the observance of it is a part of their religion." (3.) "This has been done of old time; they have received from their fathers an honour for Moses; they have antiquity for it." (4.) "This had been done in every city, wherever there are any Jews, so that none of them can be ignorant what stress that law laid upon these things: and therefore, though the gospel has set us free from these things, yet they cannot be blamed if they are loth to part with them, and cannot of a sudden be persuaded to look upon those things as needless and indifferent which they, and their fathers before them, had been so long taught, and taught of God too, to place religion in. We must therefore give them time, must meet them half-way; they must be borne with awhile, and brought on gradually, and we must comply with them as far as we can without betraying our gospel liberty." Thus does this apostle show the spirit of a moderator, that is, a spirit of moderation, being careful to give no offence either to Jew or Gentile, and contriving, as much as may be, to please both sides and provoke neither. Note, We are not to think it strange if people be wedded to customs which they have had transmitted to them from their fathers, and which they have been educated in an opinion of as sacred; and therefore allowances must be made in such cases, and not rigour used.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–21. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
On Modesty
Moreover, in that dispute about the observance or non-observance of the Law, Peter was the first of all to be endued with the Spirit, and, after making preface touching the calling of the nations, to say, "And now why are ye tempting the Lord, concerning the imposition upon the brethren of a yoke which neither we nor our fathers were able to support? But however, through the grace of Jesus we believe that we shall be saved in the same way as they." This sentence both "loosed" those parts of the law which were abandoned, and "bound" those which were reserved.
Apostolic ConstitutionsAD 380
CONSTITUTIONS OF THE HOLY APOSTLES
And when some said one thing, and some another, I Peter stood up, and said unto them: "Men and brethren, ye know how that from ancient days God made choice among you that the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel by my mouth, and believe; and God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 32
Observe Peter from the first standing aloof from the affair, and even to this time judaizing. And yet he says "ye know." Perhaps those were present who of old found fault with him in the matter of Cornelius, and went in with him on that occasion: for this reason he brings them forward as witnesses. "From old days," he says, "did choose among you." What means, "Among you?" Either, in Palestine, or, you being present. "By my mouth." Observe how he shows that it was God speaking by him, and no human utterance. And that expression, "Chose:" just as in their own case he says not, so willed it, but, "Chose that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the Gospel and believe." Whence is this proved? From the Spirit.
John ChrysostomAD 407
CATENA ON THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 15.7-8
See how Peter was, from the beginning, removed from the debate and how he was following the ways of the Jews even still. “You know,” he says. Perhaps some of those who had once accused him with regard to Cornelius were present and had entered with him, so that he brings them as witnesses. “From the ancient days God chose among you.” What does “among you” mean? It means either “in Palestine” or the “you” is those who were present. “Through my mouth.” See how [Peter] shows that God spoke through him and there was nothing human. “And God, who knows human hearts, testified to them”—he refers them to the testimony of the Spirit—“by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 15:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.