Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But G1161 there rose up G1817 certain G5100 of G575 the sect G139 of the Pharisees G5330 which believed G4100, saying G3004, That G3754 it was needful G1163 to circumcise G4059 them G846, and G5037 to command G3853 them to keep G5083 the law G3551 of Moses G3475.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
But some of those who had come to trust were from the party of the P’rushim; and they stood up and said, “It is necessary to circumcise them and direct them to observe the Torah of Moshe.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But some believers from the party of the Pharisees stood up and declared, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to obey the law of Moses.”
Ask
American Standard Version
But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees who believed, saying, It is needful to circumcise them, and to charge them to keep the law of Moses.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But some of the sect of the Pharisees who believed rose up, saying, “It is necessary to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the Torah of Moses.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But said they, certaine of the sect of the Pharises, which did beleeue, rose vp, saying, that it was needefull to circumcise them, and to commaund them to keepe the lawe of Moses.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and there rose up certain of those of the sect of the Pharisees who believed, saying--`It behoveth to circumcise them, to command them also to keep the law of Moses.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1)
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1) View full PDF
Acts 15:1-20
Acts 15:1-20 View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,448 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 15:5 marks a pivotal moment in the early church's history, articulating the specific theological challenge posed by a group of believing Pharisees at the Jerusalem Council. This verse highlights their insistence that Gentile converts must undergo circumcision and adhere to the Mosaic Law for salvation, directly opposing the emerging understanding of salvation by grace through faith alone and setting the stage for a crucial debate on the nature of Christian inclusion.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the narrative of Acts 15, immediately following the initial dispute in Antioch concerning the necessity of circumcision for Gentile believers (Acts 15:1) and the subsequent decision to send Paul, Barnabas, and others to Jerusalem to consult with the apostles and elders (Acts 15:2-4). Acts 15:5 specifically identifies the dissenting party within the Jerusalem church, providing the theological rationale for their opposition to a grace-only gospel for Gentiles. It sets the stage for the formal deliberations of the Jerusalem Council, which begins in Acts 15:6, where the apostles and elders gather to consider this very matter.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The first century Jewish world was deeply rooted in the Mosaic Law, which included circumcision as a sign of the covenant with Abraham (Genesis 17:9-14). The Pharisees, a prominent Jewish sect, were known for their strict adherence to the Law, both written and oral, and their fervent desire to maintain Jewish distinctiveness. When some Pharisees converted to Christianity, they naturally brought their pre-existing theological frameworks with them. They believed that Christianity was the fulfillment of Judaism, and therefore, Gentiles who wished to join God's people must fully convert to Judaism first, which included circumcision and adherence to the entire Law of Moses. This perspective created significant tension between Jewish and Gentile believers, threatening to fragment the nascent Christian movement along ethnic and legalistic lines.
  • Key Themes: Acts 15:5 encapsulates several critical themes foundational to early Christian theology. Foremost is the nature of salvation, directly contrasting salvation by grace through faith with salvation by works of the law. The believing Pharisees' demand for circumcision and law-keeping effectively added human effort to God's gracious provision, challenging the core of the Gospel. This verse also highlights the theme of Gentile inclusion into the covenant people of God, illustrating the struggle within the early church to fully embrace the radical universality of Christ's redemption, which transcends ethnic and cultural boundaries. Finally, it underscores the theme of doctrinal purity and authority within the early church, as the apostles and elders had to discern the true implications of the Gospel for all believers, ensuring that the message of Christ remained uncompromised. This council, sparked by the issues in Acts 15:5, was crucial for establishing the authoritative interpretation of Christian doctrine for future generations.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sect (Greek, haíresis', G139): Meaning "a choice, i.e. (specially) a party or (abstractly) disunion." In this context, it refers to a specific group or faction, namely the Pharisees. The term "sect" here does not carry the later negative connotation of "heresy" but simply identifies a distinct group with particular beliefs and practices within Judaism, some of whom had now come to faith in Christ.
  • Needful (Greek, deî', G1163): Meaning "it is (was, etc.) necessary (as binding)." This word conveys a strong sense of obligation or divine imperative. The believing Pharisees were not merely suggesting these practices but asserting them as absolutely essential for salvation, implying that without them, one could not be truly saved or fully incorporated into God's people.
  • Circumcise (Greek, peritémnō', G4059): Meaning "to cut around, i.e. (specially) to circumcise." This term refers to the ancient Abrahamic covenant sign, which had become a defining mark of Jewish identity. The demand for circumcision was not merely a cultural preference but a theological requirement, signifying full adherence to the Mosaic covenant as a prerequisite for salvation and fellowship.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed,": This opening clause introduces the specific group posing the challenge. The "but" (G1161, ) indicates a contrast or opposition to the joyful report of Gentile conversions mentioned in the preceding verses. The crucial detail is "which believed" (G4100, pisteúō), indicating these were not external opponents of Christianity but rather Jewish Christians who, despite their faith in Jesus, retained a strong adherence to their Pharisaic background and its legalistic interpretations of the Law. Their faith in Christ was genuine, but their understanding of salvation's implications for Gentiles was flawed.
  • "saying, That it was needful to circumcise them,": This articulates the first, and most symbolic, of their demands. "Needful" (G1163, deî) underscores their conviction that this was a non-negotiable requirement. Circumcision (G4059, peritémnō) was the physical sign of the Abrahamic covenant and a cornerstone of Jewish identity. For these Pharisees, becoming a Christian meant first becoming a Jew in the fullest sense, signified by this ancient ritual.
  • "and to command [them] to keep the law of Moses.": This second demand broadens the scope beyond circumcision to the entire Mosaic Law (G3551, nómos and G3475, Mōseús). To "command them to keep" (G3853, parangéllō and G5083, tēréō) suggests an authoritative injunction for Gentile converts to observe the vast body of commandments given through Moses, including dietary laws, Sabbath observance, and other ceremonial regulations. This demand represented a significant burden and a fundamental misunderstanding of the freedom and universality of the New Covenant in Christ.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Conflict to immediately establish the central theological tension of the Jerusalem Council. The phrase "But there rose up" signals an opposing force, setting the stage for the dramatic debate that follows. There is a subtle Irony in the description of "Pharisees which believed," as those who had embraced the Messiah, the fulfillment of the Law, were paradoxically advocating for a continued, binding adherence to the very Law that Christ had transcended. This highlights the internal struggle within the early church to reconcile its Jewish roots with its universal mission. Furthermore, the explicit demands for circumcision and law-keeping serve as a Foreshadowing of the profound theological discussions and decisions that will shape the future trajectory of Christianity, emphasizing salvation by grace through faith alone.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 15:5 encapsulates the foundational theological debate of the early church regarding the nature of salvation and the inclusion of Gentiles. The insistence on circumcision and law-keeping by the believing Pharisees directly challenged the burgeoning understanding that salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone, apart from works of the law. This verse highlights the tension between the Old Covenant's emphasis on external markers and the New Covenant's focus on an internal transformation of the heart. The resolution of this conflict at the Jerusalem Council was critical for affirming the Gospel's universal appeal and preventing Christianity from becoming merely a sect of Judaism, ensuring that the path to God was open to all humanity through Christ.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 15:5 serves as a timeless warning against legalism and the temptation to add human requirements to God's free gift of salvation. It reminds us that while good works are a natural outflow of genuine faith, they are never a prerequisite for receiving God's grace or a means of earning His favor. The early church, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, decisively rejected the demands of the believing Pharisees, affirming that Christ's atoning work is sufficient for salvation for all who believe, regardless of their ethnic background or adherence to specific rituals. For believers today, this passage calls us to guard the simplicity and purity of the Gospel, ensuring that we do not impose unnecessary burdens on others or create barriers to entry into God's kingdom. It encourages us to celebrate the radical inclusivity of the church, where all are welcome and united by faith in Jesus Christ, and to continually discern between essential biblical truths and non-essential cultural or traditional practices.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might we, consciously or unconsciously, add requirements to the simple message of salvation by grace in our own lives or churches?
  • How can we ensure that our understanding of faith leads to genuine freedom in Christ rather than a new form of legalism?
  • What practical steps can we take to foster a more inclusive and welcoming environment in our Christian communities, reflecting the universal reach of the Gospel?

FAQ

What was the "sect of the Pharisees which believed" and why were they significant?

Answer: The "sect of the Pharisees which believed" refers to Jewish individuals who had accepted Jesus as the Messiah but continued to adhere strictly to the tenets of Pharisaism, particularly concerning the Mosaic Law. Their significance lies in the fact that they were not external opponents of Christianity but rather members of the nascent church. Their insistence that Gentile converts must be circumcised and commanded to keep the Law of Moses created a profound internal theological crisis, forcing the early church to formally define the terms of salvation and inclusion for non-Jews. This group represented a powerful voice within the Jewish Christian community that genuinely believed their demands were consistent with God's covenant, yet their views threatened to undermine the radical grace of the Gospel and limit its universal appeal.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 15:5, with its legalistic demands, powerfully highlights the necessity of Christ's work in fulfilling and transcending the Mosaic Law. The Pharisaic insistence on circumcision and law-keeping as prerequisites for salvation reveals a misunderstanding of the new covenant inaugurated by Jesus. Christ did not come to abolish the Law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17), bringing to completion its purposes and establishing a new and better covenant in His blood (Luke 22:20). Through His perfect obedience and sacrificial death, Jesus became the "end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes" (Romans 10:4). The true "circumcision" now is not of the flesh but of the heart, by the Spirit (Romans 2:29), signifying an inward transformation rather than an outward ritual. By breaking down the dividing wall of hostility between Jew and Gentile through His cross, Christ created one new humanity, reconciling both to God in one body (Ephesians 2:14-16), making the legalistic demands of Acts 15:5 obsolete for salvation.

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 15 verses 1–5

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Even when things go on very smoothly and pleasantly in a state or in a church, it is folly to be secure, and to think the mountain stands strong and cannot be moved; some uneasiness or other will arise, which is not foreseen, cannot be prevented, but must be prepared for. If ever there was a heaven upon earth, surely it was in the church at Antioch at this time, when there were so many excellent ministers there, and blessed Paul among them, building up that church in her most holy faith. But here we have their peace disturbed, and differences arising. Here is,

I. A new doctrine started among them, which occasioned this division, obliging the Gentile converts to submit to circumcision and the ceremonial law, Act 15:1. Many that had been proselytes to the Jewish religion became Christians; and they would have such as were proselyted to the Christian religion to become Jews.

1.The persons that urged this were certain men who came down from Judea; some think such as had been of the Pharisees (Act 15:5), or perhaps of those priests who were obedient to the faith, Act 6:7. They came from Judea, pretending perhaps to be sent by the apostles at Jerusalem, at least to be countenanced by them. Having a design to spread their notions, they came to Antioch, because that was the head-quarters of those that preached to the Gentiles, and the rendezvous of the Gentile converts; and, if they could but make an interest there, this leaven would soon be diffused to all the churches of the Gentiles. They insinuated themselves into an acquaintance with the brethren, pretended to be very glad that they had embraced the Christian faith, and congratulated them on their conversion; but tell them that yet one thing they lack, they must be circumcised. Note, Those that are ever so well taught have need to stand upon their guard that they be not untaught again, or ill taught.

2.The position they laid down, the thesis they gave, was this, that except the Gentiles who turned Christians were circumcised after the manner of Moses, and thereby bound themselves to all the observances of the ceremonial law, they could not be saved. As to this, (1.) Many of the Jews who embraced the faith of Christ, yet continued very zealous for the law, Act 21:20. They knew it was from God and its authority was sacred, valued it for its antiquity, had been bred up in the observance of it, and it is probable had been often devoutly affected in their attendance on these observances; they therefore kept them up after they were by baptism admitted into the Christian church, kept up the distinction of meats, and used the ceremonial purifyings from ceremonial pollutions, attend the temple service, and celebrated the feasts of the Jews. Herein they were connived at, because the prejudices of education are not to be overcome all at once, and in a few years the mistake would be effectually rectified by the destruction of the temple and the total dissolution of the Jewish church, by which the observance of the Mosaic ritual would become utterly impracticable. But it did not suffice them that they were herein indulged themselves, they must have the Gentile converts brought under the same obligations. Note, There is a strange proneness in us to make our opinion and practice a rule and a law to every body else, to judge of all about us by our standard, and to conclude that because we do well all do wrong that do not just as we do. (2.) Those Jews who believed that Christ was the Messiah, as they could not get clear of their affection to the law, so they could not get clear of the notions they had of the Messiah, that he should set up a temporal kingdom in favour of the Jewish nation, should make this illustrious and victorious; it was a disappointment to them that there was as yet nothing done towards this in the way they expected. But now that they hear the doctrine of Christ is received among the Gentiles, and his kingdom begins to be set up in the midst of them, if they can but persuade those that embrace Christ to embrace the law of Moses too they hope their point will be gained, the Jewish nation will be made as considerable as they can wish, though in another way; and "Therefore by all means let the brethren be pressed to be circumcised and keep the law, and then with our religion our dominion will be extended, and we shall in a little time be able to shake off the Roman yoke; and not only so, but to put it on the necks of our neighbours, and so shall have such a kingdom of the Messiah as we promised ourselves." Note, It is no wonder if those who have wrong notions of the kingdom of Christ take wrong measures for the advancement of it, and such as really tend to the destruction of it, as these do. (3.) The controversy about the circumcising of the Gentile proselytes had been on foot among the Jews long before this. This is observed by Dr. Whitby out of Josephus - Antiq. 20.38-45: "That when Izates, the son of Helen queen of Adiabene, embraced the Jews' religion, Ananias declared he might do it without circumcision; but Eleazar maintained that it was a great impiety to remain uncircumcised." And when two eminent Gentiles fled to Josephus (as he relates in the history of his own life) "the zealots among the Jews were urgent for their circumcision; but Josephus dissuaded them from insisting upon it." Such has been the difference in all ages between bigotry and moderation. (4.) It is observable what a mighty stress they laid upon it; they do not only say, "You ought to be circumcised after the manner of Moses, and it will be good service to the kingdom of the Messiah if you be; it will best accommodate matters between you and the Jewish converts, and we shall take it very kindly if you will, and shall converse the more familiarly with you;" but, "Except you be circumcised you cannot be saved. If you be not herein of our mind and way, you will never go to heaven, and therefore of course you must go to hell." Note, it is common for proud impostors to enforce their own inventions under pain of damnation; and to tell people that unless they believe just as they would have them believe, and do just as they would have them do, they cannot be saved, it is impossible they should; not only their case is hazardous, but it is desperate. Thus the Jews tell their brethren that except they be of their church, and come into their communion, and conform to the ceremonies of their worship, though otherwise good men and believers in Christ, yet they cannot be saved; salvation itself cannot save them. None are in Christ but those that are within their pale. We ought to see ourselves well warranted by the word of God before we say, "Except you do so and so, you cannot be saved."

II. The opposition which Paul and Barnabas gave to this schismatical notion, which engrossed salvation to the Jews, now that Christ has opened the door of salvation to the Gentiles (Act 15:2): They had no small dissension and disputation with them. They would by no means yield to this doctrine, but appeared and argued publicly against it. 1. As faithful servants of Christ, they would not see his truths betrayed. They knew that Christ came to free us from the yoke of the ceremonial law, and to take down that wall of partition between Jews and Gentiles and unite them both in himself; and therefore could not bear to hear of circumcising the Gentile converts, when their instructions were only to baptize them. The Jews would unite with the Gentiles, that is, they would have them to conform in every thing to their rites, and then, and not till then they will look upon them as their brethren; and no thanks to them. But, this not being the way in which Christ designed to unite them, it is not to be admitted. 2. As spiritual fathers to the Gentile converts, they would not see their liberties encroached upon. They had told the Gentiles that if they believed in Jesus Christ they should be saved; and now to be told that this was not enough to save them, except they were circumcised and kept the law of Moses, this was such a discouragement to them at setting out, and would be such a stumbling-block in their way, as might almost tempt them to think of returning into Egypt again; and therefore the apostles set themselves against it.

III. The expedient pitched upon for preventing the mischief of this dangerous notion, and silencing those that vented it, as well as quieting the minds of the people with reference to it. They determined that Paul and Barnabas, and some others of their number, should go to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders, concerning this doubt. Not that the church at Antioch had any doubt concerning it: they knew the liberty wherewith Christ had made them free; but they sent the case to Jerusalem, 1. Because those who taught this doctrine came from Jerusalem, and pretended to have directions from the apostles there to urge circumcision upon the Gentile converts; it was therefore very proper to send to Jerusalem about it, to know if they had any such direction from the church there. And it was soon found to be all wrong, which yet pretended to be of apostolical right. It was true that these went out from them (Act 15:24), but they never had any such orders from them. 2. Because those who were taught this doctrine would be the better confirmed in their opposition to it, and in the less danger of being shocked and disturbed by it, if they were sure that the apostles and elders at Jerusalem (which was the Christian church that of all others retained the most affection to the law of Moses) were against it; and, if they could but have this under their hands, it would be the likeliest means to silence and shame these incendiaries, who had pretended to have it from them. 3. Because the apostles at Jerusalem were fittest to be consulted in a point not yet fully settled; and being most eminent for an infallible spirit, peculiar to them as apostles, their decision would be likely to end the controversy. It was owing to the subtlety and malice of the great enemy of the church's peace (as it appears by Paul's frequent complaints of these judaizing teachers, these false apostles, these deceitful workers, these enemies of the cross of Christ), that it had not this effect.

IV. Their journey to Jerusalem upon this errand, Act 15:3. Where we find, 1. That they were honoured at parting: They were brought on their way by the church, which was then much used as a token of respect to useful men, and is directed to be done after a godly sort, Jo3 1:6. Thus the church showed their favour to those who witnessed against these encroachments on the liberties of the Gentile converts, and stood up for them. 2. That they did good as they went along. They were men that would not lose time, and therefore visited the churches by the way; they passed through Phenice and Samaria, and as they went declared the conversion of the Gentiles, and what wonderful success the gospel had had among them, which caused great joy to all the brethren. Note, The progress of the gospel is and ought to be a matter of great joy. All the brethren, the faithful brethren in Christ's family, rejoice when more are born into the family; for the family will be never the poorer for the multitude of its children. In Christ and heaven there is portion enough, and inheritance enough for them all.

V. Their hearty welcome at Jerusalem, Act 15:4. 1. The good entertainment their friends gave them: They were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, were embraced as brethren, and had audience as messengers of the church at Antioch; they received them with all possible expressions of love and friendship. 2. The good entertainment they gave their friends: They declared all things that God had done with them, gave them an account of the success of their ministry among the Gentiles, not what they had done, but what God had done with them, what he had by his grace in them enabled them to do, and what he had by his grace in their hearers enabled them to receive. As they went they had planted, as they came back they had watered; but in both they were ready to own it was God that gave the increase. Note, It is a great honour to be employed for God, to be workers for him; for those that are so have him a worker with them, and he must have all the glory.

VI. The opposition they met with from the same party at Jerusalem, Act 15:5. When Barnabas and Paul gave an account of the multitude of the Gentiles, and of the great harvest of souls gathered in to Christ there, and all about them congratulated them upon it, there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees, who received the tidings very coldly, and, though they believed in Christ, yet were not satisfied in the admission of these converts, but thought it was needful to circumcise them. Observe here, 1. That those who have been most prejudiced against the gospel yet have been captivated by it; so mighty has it been through God to the pulling down of strong-holds. When Christ was here upon earth, few or none of the rulers and of the Pharisees believed on him; but now there are those of the sect of the Pharisees who believed, and many of them, we hope, in sincerity. 2. That it is very hard for men suddenly to get clear of their prejudices: those that had been Pharisees, even after they became Christians, retained some of the old leaven. All did not so, witness Paul, but some did; and they had such a jealousy for the ceremonial law, and such a dislike of the Gentiles, that they could not admit the Gentiles into communion with them, unless they would be circumcised, and thereby engage themselves to keep the law of Moses. This was, in their opinion, needful; and for their parts they would not converse with them unless they submitted to it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–5. Public domain.
Copy as
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book V
He then cursorily touches on his own conversion from a persecutor to an apostle-confirming thereby the Acts of the Apostles, in which book may be found the very subject of this epistle, how that certain persons interposed, and said that men ought to be circumcised, and that the law of Moses was to be observed; and how the apostles, when consulted, determined, by the authority of the Holy Ghost, that "a yoke should not be put upon men's necks which their fathers even had not been able to bear." Now, since the Acts of the Apostles thus agree with Paul, it becomes apparent why you reject them.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 32
Great effrontery this, of the Pharisees, that even after faith they set up the Law, and will not obey the Apostles. But see these, how mildly they speak, and not in the tone of authority: such words are amiable, and more apt to fix themselves in the mind. Observe, it is nowhere a display of words, but demonstration by facts, by the Spirit. And yet, though they have such proofs, they still speak gently. But even if they would needs bring over the Gentiles to their side, they learn that neither must the Apostles overlook it.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Acts
Saying that it is necessary to circumcise them. The Galatians were deceived by this error, believing that circumcision and the ceremonies of the law should be mixed with the grace of baptism.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 15:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.