Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
When they were at the great stone which is in Gibeon, Amasa went before them. And Joab's garment that he had put on was girded unto him, and upon it a girdle with a sword fastened upon his loins in the sheath thereof; and as he went forth it fell out.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
When they were at the great H1419 stone H68 which is in Gibeon H1391, Amasa H6021 went H935 before H6440 them. And Joab's H3097 garment H4055 that he had put on H3830 was girded H2296 unto him, and upon it a girdle H2289 with a sword H2719 fastened H6775 upon his loins H4975 in the sheath H8593 thereof; and as he went forth H3318 it fell out H5307.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
On arrival at the big rock in Giv'on, 'Amasa came to meet them. Yo'av was wearing his battle clothes, over which he had girded a belt with a sheathed sword; but as he came forward it fell out.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And while they were at the great stone in Gibeon, Amasa joined them. Now Joab was dressed in military attire, with a dagger strapped to his belt. And as he stepped forward, he slipped the dagger from its sheath.
Ask
American Standard Version
When they were at the great stone which is in Gibeon, Amasa came to meet them. And Joab was girded with his apparel of war that he had put on, and thereon was a girdle with a sword fastened upon his loins in the sheath thereof; and as he went forth it fell out.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When they were at the great stone which is in Gibeon, Amasa came to meet them. Joab was clothed in his apparel of war that he had put on, and on it was a sash with a sword fastened on his waist in its sheath; and as he went along it fell out.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
When they were at the great stone, which is in Gibeon, Amasa went before them, and Ioabs garment, that hee had put on, was girded vnto him, and vpon it was a sword girded, which hanged on his loynes in the sheath, and as hee went, it vsed to fall out.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
they are near the great stone that is in Gibeon, and Amasa hath gone before them, and Joab is girded; his long robe he hath put on him, and upon it a girdle--a sword is fastened upon his loins in its sheath; and he hath gone out, and it falleth.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
David Returns to Jerusalem
David Returns to Jerusalem View full PDF
Sheba’s Revolt
Sheba’s Revolt View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,563 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

meticulously details a pivotal moment leading to a treacherous assassination, describing the convergence of Joab and Amasa at the significant "great stone" in Gibeon. The verse portrays Joab's seemingly ordinary military attire, emphasizing his sword fastened at his loins, and the crucial, yet deceptively simple, detail that "as he went forth it fell out." This seemingly accidental occurrence is widely interpreted as a calculated and deliberate maneuver by Joab, designed to disarm Amasa's suspicion and provide immediate access to his weapon, thereby setting the stage for the swift and ruthless murder that immediately follows, solidifying Joab's continued, albeit bloody, grip on military power within David's kingdom.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the chilling prelude to one of the most brutal acts of treachery in David's reign, immediately following the tumultuous aftermath of Absalom's rebellion and the fragile reunification of Israel. King David has just returned to Jerusalem, and a new, opportunistic rebellion led by Sheba son of Bichri has erupted, threatening to once again splinter the kingdom (as detailed in 2 Samuel 20:1-2). In an attempt to secure loyalty and perhaps to strategically diminish Joab's entrenched power, David had previously appointed Amasa, his nephew and former commander of Absalom's army, as the new commander of Israel's forces (a promise made in 2 Samuel 19:13). However, Amasa's perceived delay in mobilizing troops (described in 2 Samuel 20:4-5) prompts David to dispatch Abishai, Joab's brother, in pursuit of Sheba. Joab, ever the pragmatic, ruthless, and indispensable military leader, joins the pursuit, effectively reasserting his de facto command. This verse, therefore, describes the fateful rendezvous point where Joab confronts Amasa, setting the immediate scene for the treacherous act that decisively resolves the intense power struggle for military leadership.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The "great stone which is in Gibeon" likely refers to a well-known and easily identifiable landmark in the ancient city of Gibeon, a location steeped in Israelite history, mentioned in significant events such as the Gibeonite deception in Joshua 9 and Solomon's prayer for wisdom in 1 Kings 3. Its prominence would have made it a natural and recognized gathering point for military forces. Militarily, the description of Joab's garment being "girded unto him" is culturally significant; men in the ancient Near East would tuck their long robes into a belt or girdle to allow for freedom of movement, indicating readiness for travel, battle, or strenuous activity. The sword fastened "upon his loins in the sheath thereof" was standard practice for carrying a weapon securely. The broader cultural context of ancient Near Eastern politics and warfare frequently involved ruthless elimination of rivals and consolidation of power through violent means, especially during periods of political instability. Joab's character, as consistently demonstrated throughout the Books of Samuel—from his killing of Abner in 2 Samuel 3:27 to his role in Uriah's death in 2 Samuel 11:14-17—reflects a willingness to employ extreme measures to secure his position and protect what he perceived as David's best interests, often operating beyond legal or moral bounds.
  • Key Themes: The immediate narrative of 2 Samuel 20 is profoundly marked by themes of treachery and deception, which are vividly embodied in Joab's actions. The seemingly accidental "falling out" of his sword is a masterful narrative device, meticulously crafted to disarm Amasa's suspicions and conceal Joab's true murderous intent, which is brutally realized in the subsequent verses (2 Samuel 20:9-10). This incident also powerfully highlights the pervasive power struggle within King David's court and military leadership. Joab, a seasoned but often ruthless commander, was unwilling to relinquish his long-held authority to Amasa, whom David had appointed in an attempt to stabilize his kingdom. Underlying these events is the broader theme of ruthless ambition, where personal gain, the desire for control, and a pragmatic view of power supersede loyalty, justice, and even familial ties. This episode serves as a stark example of the moral complexities and human failings that can plague even a divinely appointed kingdom, echoing the destructive consequences of sin and disunity seen throughout David's tumultuous reign.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • girded (Hebrew, châgar', H2296): This verb signifies "to gird on (as a belt, armor, etc.)," "to prepare for action." In this context, Joab's garment being "girded unto him" suggests he was dressed for travel or battle, indicating readiness for immediate movement. However, in light of the subsequent events, this "readiness" takes on a sinister double meaning, subtly hinting at a readiness not just for the pursuit of Sheba, but for the treacherous act he was about to commit against Amasa.
  • sword (Hebrew, chereb', H2719): This noun refers to "a cutting instrument (from its destructive effect), as a knife, sword, or other sharp implement." The detailed mention of Joab's sword, its placement "upon his loins in the sheath thereof," draws the reader's attention to the weapon itself. It is not merely an accessory but the instrument of his impending violence, highlighted by its seemingly accidental "falling out," which is a calculated part of his deadly scheme.
  • fell out (Hebrew, nâphal', H5307): This primitive root means "to fall, in a great variety of applications (intransitive or causative, literal or figurative)." While the verb can mean "to fall out" accidentally, in this specific narrative context, especially given Joab's character and the immediate aftermath, it is overwhelmingly interpreted by scholars as a deliberate, calculated action by Joab. He likely allowed the sword to slip from its sheath, perhaps into his hand, or positioned it in such a way that it appeared to fall, thereby distracting Amasa and making his own weapon readily accessible for the fatal blow, all while maintaining an appearance of innocence or disarming his opponent's suspicion. This interpretation is strongly supported by Joab's character and his immediate use of the sword in the following verses.

Verse Breakdown

  • "When they [were] at the great stone which [is] in Gibeon, Amasa went before them.": This opening clause precisely establishes the geographical setting for the fateful encounter. Gibeon, a historically and religiously significant site, provides a concrete and recognizable backdrop for the unfolding drama. Amasa's position "before them" suggests he was leading the contingent, or at least prominently positioned in the procession, making him an exposed and vulnerable target for Joab's machinations. His newly bestowed leadership role, intended to consolidate David's power, ironically places him directly in the path of Joab's lethal ambition.
  • "And Joab's garment that he had put on was girded unto him, and upon it a girdle [with] a sword fastened upon his loins in the sheath thereof;": This remarkably detailed description of Joab's attire is crucial for understanding the deception. It paints a picture of a man prepared for military action, with his outer garment secured for ease of movement and his weapon properly sheathed at his side. The emphasis on the sword being "fastened upon his loins in the sheath thereof" highlights its seemingly secure and proper position, making its subsequent "falling out" all the more suspicious and indicative of a deliberate act rather than a genuine accident.
  • "and as he went forth it fell out.": This is the pivotal and most deceptive moment of the verse. The sudden, described "falling out" of the sword is the narrative's subtle yet powerful signal of impending treachery. It serves as a deceptive maneuver, allowing Joab to retrieve the sword without raising Amasa's alarm or suspicion, transforming a seemingly accidental occurrence into a calculated prelude to murder. This action immediately precedes Joab's false greeting and the fatal stab, making the "falling out" a critical component of his premeditated assassination.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 2 Samuel 20:8 masterfully employs several literary devices to build tension, reveal character, and foreshadow the impending tragedy. Foreshadowing is paramount, as the seemingly innocuous detail of Joab's sword "falling out" directly anticipates its immediate and violent use in the following verses, creating a palpable sense of impending doom. This subtle hint generates significant suspense, drawing the reader into the unfolding drama and hinting at the dark, murderous intentions beneath Joab's calm and calculated exterior. There is also a profound irony at play: Joab's careful preparation and the apparent "accident" of the sword's fall serve as a psychological disarming mechanism for Amasa, who likely expects a cordial greeting from his cousin and fellow commander, not a fatal attack. The sword itself functions as a powerful symbol of power, authority, and the brutal means by which Joab maintains his control, contrasting sharply with the more diplomatic, though often flawed, leadership of King David.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The events of 2 Samuel 20:8, culminating in Amasa's assassination, powerfully illustrate the destructive consequences of unchecked ambition and the pervasive nature of sin within human leadership, even within the context of God's chosen nation. Joab's calculated treachery underscores the biblical theme that the human heart is deceitful and desperately wicked (Jeremiah 17:9), capable of extreme violence and manipulation when driven by a lust for power and control. This episode serves as a stark reminder that even those who serve God's purposes, or are instrumental in His plans, can operate outside His moral will, using sinful means to achieve their ends. It highlights the constant need for discernment, integrity, and a reliance on divine justice rather than human cunning or violence, demonstrating that God's plan can unfold even amidst human depravity, but not without consequences.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed account of Joab's deception in 2 Samuel 20:8 offers profound and sobering lessons for contemporary believers. It compels us to critically examine the insidious nature of unchecked ambition and the subtle ways in which a desire for power, position, or control can corrupt even those who are ostensibly serving a good cause or a righteous leader. Joab's actions serve as a somber and enduring warning against the temptation to use manipulative, dishonest, or violent means to achieve desired outcomes, unequivocally reminding us that the ends, no matter how seemingly beneficial, never justify unrighteous means. Furthermore, this passage encourages us to cultivate profound spiritual discernment, recognizing that appearances can be deeply deceiving and that true character is often revealed not in overt declarations or outward displays, but in subtle actions, underlying motives, and the willingness to operate with integrity even when it is costly. It calls us to embody integrity in all our dealings, understanding that genuine leadership and lasting influence are built on trust, honesty, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to divine justice, rather than on cunning, coercion, or ruthless self-preservation.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Joab's character in this passage challenge your understanding of leadership and power, especially within a faith context where motives and methods are often scrutinized?
  • In what ways might we, even subtly or unconsciously, be tempted to use deceptive or manipulative means to achieve our goals, and what practical steps can we take to guard against such tendencies in our own lives?
  • What does this narrative teach us about the critical importance of discernment in evaluating the intentions and character of others, even those who appear to be allies or hold positions of authority?

FAQ

Was the sword falling out truly accidental, or was it a deliberate act by Joab?

Answer: While the Hebrew verb nâphal (H5307), translated "fell out," can imply an accidental occurrence, the overwhelming consensus among biblical scholars and commentators is that Joab's action was a deliberate, calculated maneuver. This interpretation is strongly supported by the immediate context of 2 Samuel 20:9-10, where Joab immediately uses the sword to fatally stab Amasa. Given Joab's consistently ruthless character, his history of eliminating rivals (e.g., Abner in 2 Samuel 3:27), and the strategic advantage gained by disarming Amasa's suspicion, the "falling out" was almost certainly a deceptive prelude to murder, a cunning ruse to gain the upper hand.

Why did Joab feel the need to kill Amasa?

Answer: Joab's motivation was primarily rooted in a desperate power struggle and the preservation of his own long-held authority. King David had recently appointed Amasa as the new commander of Israel's army, a position Joab had held for many years and considered his by right and accomplishment (see 2 Samuel 19:13). Amasa's appointment was a direct and existential threat to Joab's long-standing influence, military leadership, and personal security. Joab, known for his decisive and often violent actions to secure his position and protect David's kingdom as he saw fit, perceived Amasa as a rival who needed to be eliminated to reassert his undisputed command, especially in the midst of a new rebellion led by Sheba son of Bichri.

What is the significance of "the great stone which is in Gibeon" as the meeting place?

Answer: Gibeon was a historically and religiously significant city in Israel, known from earlier accounts such as the Gibeonite deception in Joshua 9 and Solomon's profound prayer for wisdom in 1 Kings 3. The "great stone" likely refers to a prominent, easily identifiable landmark in the area, serving as a natural and recognized rendezvous point. Its significance as a known location adds a layer of dramatic weight and tragic irony to the scene, as a place of past divine encounter or national memory becomes the backdrop for a heinous act of human treachery and murder, underscoring the pervasive nature of sin even in sacred spaces.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The dark treachery of Joab in 2 Samuel 20:8, where he employs cunning deception and brutal violence to secure his earthly power and position, stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the perfect character and redemptive mission of Jesus Christ. Joab's act is a chilling example of fallen humanity's relentless pursuit of self-interest, leading inevitably to death, disunity, and moral corruption. In profound contrast, Christ, though possessing all power and authority in heaven and on earth, "did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many" (Mark 10:45). While Joab's sword was unsheathed for murder and the elimination of a rival, the "sword" of Christ, the living and active Word of God, is used not for destruction but for discernment, spiritual warfare, and ultimately, for salvation (Hebrews 4:12). Unlike Joab, who seized and maintained power through deceit and bloodshed, Jesus willingly laid down His life, even allowing Himself to be betrayed by a kiss from a trusted disciple (Luke 22:47-48) and led as a lamb to the slaughter, opening not His mouth (Isaiah 53:7). His kingdom is not established through violence, the elimination of rivals, or earthly political maneuvering, but through sacrificial love, truth, and the transformative power of the Holy Spirit in the hearts of humanity (John 18:36). Joab's ambition led to a bloody end for Amasa; Christ's divine mission led to eternal life and reconciliation with God for all who believe, perfectly fulfilling the ultimate purpose of God's righteous rule, which is utterly devoid of the treachery and self-serving violence so tragically evident in human history.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 20 verses 4–13

We have here Amasa's fall just as he began to rise. He was nephew to David (Sa2 17:25), had been Absalom's general and commander-in-chief of his rebellious army, but, that being routed, he came over into David's interest, upon a promise that he should be general of his forces instead of Joab. Sheba's rebellion gives David an occasion to fulfil his promise sooner than he could wish, but Joab's envy and emulation rendered its fulfillment of ill consequence both to him and David.

I. Amasa has a commission to raise forces for the suppressing of Sheba's rebellion, and is ordered to raise them with all possible expedition, Sa2 20:4. It seems, the men of Judah, though forward to attend the king's triumphs, were backward enough to fight his battles; else, when they were all in a body attending him to Jerusalem, they might immediately have pursued Sheba, and have crushed that cockatrice in the egg. But most love a loyalty, as well as a religion, that is cheap and easy. Many boast of their being akin to Christ that yet are very loth to venture for him. Amasa is sent to assemble the men of Judah within three days; but he finds them so backward and unready that he cannot do it within the time appointed (Sa2 20:5), though the promotion of Amasa, who had been their general under Absalom, was very obliging to them, and a proof of the clemency of David's government.

II. Upon Amasa's delay, Abishai, the brother of Joab, is ordered to take the guards and standing forces, and with them to pursue Sheba (Sa2 20:6, Sa2 20:7), for nothing could be of more dangerous consequence than to give him time. David gives these orders to Abishai, because he resolves to mortify Joab, and degrade him, not so much, I doubt, for the blood of Abner, which he had shed basely, as for the blood of Absalom, which he had shed justly and honourably. "Now (says bishop Hall) Joab smarteth for a loyal disobedience. How slippery are the stations of earthly honours and subject to continual mutability! Happy are those who are in favour with him in whom there is no shadow of change." Joab, without orders, though in disgrace, goes along with his brother, knowing he might be serviceable to the public, or perhaps now meditating the removal of his rival.

III. Joab, near Gibeon, meets with Amasa, and barbarously murders him, Sa2 20:8-10. It should seem, the great stone in Gibeon was the place appointed for the general rendezvous. There the rivals met; and Amasa, relying upon his commission, went before, as general both of the new-raised forces which he had got together, and of the veteran troops which Abishai had brought in; but Joab there took an opportunity to kill him with his own hand; and, 1. He did it subtilely, and with contrivance, and not upon a sudden provocation. He girded his coat about him, that it might not hang in his way, and girded his belt upon his coat, that his sword might be the readier to his hand; he also put his sword in a sheath too big for it, that, whenever he pleased, it might, upon a little shake, fall out, as if it fell by accident, and so he might take it into his hand, unsuspected, as if he were going to return it into the scabbard, when he designed to sheath it in the bowels of Amasa. The more there is of plot in a sin the worse it is. 2. He did it treacherously, and under pretence of friendship, that Amasa might not be upon his guard. He called him brother, for they were own cousins, enquired of his welfare (Art thou in health?) and took him by the beard, as one he was free with, to kiss him, while with the drawn sword in his other hand he was aiming at his heart. Was this done like a gentleman, like a soldier, like a general? No, but like a villain, like a base coward. Just thus he slew Abner, and went unpunished for it, which encouraged him to do the like again. 3. He did it impudently, not in a corner, but at the head of his troops, and in their sight, as one that was neither ashamed nor afraid to do it, that was so hardened in blood and murders that he could neither blush nor tremble. 4. He did it at one blow, gave the fatal push with a good-will, as we say, so that he needed not strike him again; with such a strong and steady hand he gave this one stroke that it was fatal. 5. He did it in contempt and defiance of David and the commission he had given to Amasa; for that commission was the only ground of his quarrel with him, so that David was struck at through the side of Amasa, and was, in effect, told to his face that Joab would be general, in spite of him. 6. He did it very unseasonably, when they were going against a common enemy and were concerned to be unanimous. This ill-timed quarrel might have scattered their forces, or engaged them one against another, and so have made them all an easy prey to Sheba. So contentedly could Joab sacrifice the interest both of king and kingdom to his personal revenge.

IV. Joab immediately resumes his general's place, and takes care to lead the army on in pursuit of Sheba, that, if possible, he might prevent any prejudice to the common cause by what he had done. 1. He leaves one of his men to make proclamation to the forces that were coming up that they were still engaged in David's cause, but under Joab's command, Sa2 20:11. He knew what an interest he had in the soldiery, and how many favoured him rather than Amasa, who had been a traitor, was now a turn-coat, and had never been successful; on this he boldly relied, and called them all to follow him. What man of Judah would not be for his old king and his old general? But one would wonder with what face a murderer could pursue a traitor; and how, under such a heavy load of guilt, he had courage to enter upon danger. Surely his conscience was seared with a hot iron. 2. care is taken to remove the dead body out of the way, because at that they made a stand (as Sa2 2:23), and to cover it with a cloth, Sa2 20:12, Sa2 20:13. Wicked men think themselves safe in their wickedness if they can but conceal it from the eye of the world: if it be hidden, it is with them as if it were never done. But the covering of blood with a cloth cannot stop its cry in God's ear for vengeance, or make it the less loud. However, since this was no time to arraign Joab for what he had done, and the common safety called for expedition, it was prudent to remove that which retarded the march of the army; and then they all went on after Joab, while David, who no doubt had notice soon brought him of this tragedy, could not but reflect upon it with regret that he had not formerly done justice upon Joab for the death of Abner, and that he now had exposed Amasa by preferring him. And perhaps his conscience reminded him of his employing Joab in the murder of Uriah, which had helped to harden him in cruelty.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 20:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.