Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And she took a pan, and poured them out before him; but he refused to eat. And Amnon said, Have out all men from me. And they went out every man from him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And she took H3947 a pan H4958, and poured them out H3332 before H6440 him; but he refused H3985 to eat H398. And Amnon H550 said H559, Have out H3318 all men H376 from me. And they went out H3318 every man H376 from him.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Then she took the pan and turned them out in front of him, but he refused to eat. Amnon said, "Have everyone leave me"; and everyone left him.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then she brought the pan and set it down before him, but he refused to eat. “Send everyone away!” said Amnon. And everyone went out.
Ask
American Standard Version
And she took the pan, and poured them out before him; but he refused to eat. And Amnon said, Have out all men from me. And they went out every man from him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
She took the pan, and poured them out before him; but he refused to eat. Amnon said, “Have all men leave me.” Every man went out from him.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And she tooke a pan, and powred them out before him, but he would not eat. Then Amnon saide, Cause ye euery man to goe out from me: so euery man went out from him.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and taketh the frying-pan, and poureth out before him, and he refuseth to eat, and Amnon saith, `Take ye out every one from me;' and they go out every one from him.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
Banishment and Return of Absalom
Banishment and Return of Absalom View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,327 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Samuel 13:9 marks a chilling and pivotal moment in the tragic narrative of Amnon and Tamar, King David's children. This verse captures Amnon's decisive shift from feigned illness to active malevolence: he rejects the food Tamar innocently prepared, then issues a forceful command to remove all attendants. This deliberate act of creating complete privacy isolates his unsuspecting half-sister, Tamar, from any potential witness or help, thereby setting the stage for his premeditated and heinous act of sexual violence.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded in the unfolding tragedy of 2 Samuel 13, serving as the critical turning point in Amnon's calculated scheme. It immediately follows Tamar's dutiful compliance with King David's instruction to prepare food for his supposedly ailing son, Amnon, who had feigned illness at the cunning suggestion of Jonadab. Tamar, completely unaware of Amnon's true intentions, has just completed her task, bringing the cakes directly to him. Amnon's abrupt refusal to eat and his subsequent command to clear the room transform a seemingly innocent act of familial care into a calculated prelude to a horrific crime. This moment of deliberate isolation directly precedes the rape itself, highlighting the premeditated nature of Amnon's sin and the intentional creation of an environment devoid of accountability. The narrative flow meticulously builds suspense, making Amnon's command in this verse the chilling climax of his deception and the immediate precursor to the transgression described in 2 Samuel 13:10-14.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, hospitality, familial duty, and care for the sick were deeply ingrained cultural values. It was customary for family members, especially women, to attend to the ill, including preparing special meals, which underscores Tamar's innocent and obedient actions in this context. Amnon, as a royal prince and the king's son, wielded significant authority within the royal household. His command, "Have out all men from me," would have been immediately and unquestioningly obeyed by servants and attendants, reflecting his elevated social status and the power dynamics of the court. This context of expected obedience and familial trust makes Amnon's abuse of power all the more egregious, as he exploits established social structures and the trust placed in him to achieve his wicked ends. The privacy he demands would typically be reserved for intimate family discussions or personal matters, not for illicit acts, thus highlighting the perversion of cultural norms.
  • Key Themes: 2 Samuel 13:9 powerfully illustrates several key themes prevalent in the broader narrative of 2 Samuel and the Old Testament. Firstly, it showcases Deception and Manipulation, as Amnon's entire scheme, from feigning illness to his refusal to eat, is built on a foundation of lies orchestrated with Jonadab's help, as seen in 2 Samuel 13:3-5. Secondly, it highlights the Abuse of Power and Authority, as Amnon, a royal prince, leverages his position to command complete isolation, demonstrating how authority can be tragically perverted for sinful purposes. Thirdly, the verse underscores Isolation as a Precursor to Sin, revealing a common tactic of those intending to commit evil deeds—the deliberate removal of witnesses and accountability, creating a private space where darkness can operate unseen, a principle echoed in John 3:19-20. Finally, this verse is a critical point in the Progression of Sin, demonstrating how unchecked desire, nurtured by cunning counsel, moves from thought to a carefully orchestrated plan, culminating in this demand for privacy before the ultimate transgression, a progression vividly described in James 1:14-15.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Pan (Hebrew, masrêth', H4958): The term מַשְׂרֵת (H4958, masrêth') refers to a specific type of cooking vessel, often translated as "pan." Its mention here emphasizes the domestic and seemingly innocent nature of Tamar's actions. She has prepared the food with care, using the appropriate utensil, highlighting her dutiful service and the normalcy of the situation Amnon is about to shatter. The presence of the pan underscores the mundane, everyday context that Amnon perverts for his sinister agenda.
  • Refused (Hebrew, mâʼên', H3985): The Hebrew verb מֵאֵן (H3985, mâʼên') is a strong term meaning "to refuse," "to decline," or "to reject." It implies a deliberate and firm unwillingness, not merely a lack of appetite. Amnon's refusal to eat is a conscious act that signals the end of his pretense of illness. It is a calculated rejection that immediately precedes his revelation of true intent, marking the transition from deception to the execution of his plan. This refusal is the dramatic pivot point, revealing his true, malevolent purpose.
  • Have out (Hebrew, yâtsâʼ', H3318): The imperative הוֹצִיאוּ (H3318, yâtsâʼ'), translated as "Have out," is a plural command meaning "cause to go out" or "bring out." This is a forceful, direct order, not a polite request. The use of the plural implies that Amnon is addressing multiple attendants or servants present in the room. This command carries the weight of royal authority, ensuring immediate and complete compliance, and is crucial for creating the isolated environment Amnon desires for his wicked purpose. It signifies the deliberate removal of all witnesses and potential obstacles.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And she took a pan, and poured [them] out before him;": This clause describes Tamar's final act of service in preparing the food. She has completed the task assigned by King David, presenting the cakes (likely still warm from the pan, or perhaps a mixture poured from the pan) to Amnon. Her actions here are entirely innocent, dutiful, and in keeping with the role of a caring sister, completely unaware of the sinister intentions lurking beneath Amnon's feigned illness. This sets the scene of domestic normalcy, which is about to be violently disrupted.
  • "but he refused to eat.": This is the immediate and chilling pivot point of the verse. Amnon's refusal to partake of the food he ostensibly requested reveals the true nature of his "illness." The pretense is dropped, and his rejection of the nourishment signals that his desire is not for food or comfort, but for something far darker. It marks the precise moment his deception gives way to his true, malevolent purpose, signaling to the reader that the situation has irrevocably shifted from care to danger.
  • "And Amnon said, Have out all men from me.": This is the critical command that engineers Tamar's isolation. Amnon, now abandoning his charade, issues a forceful, authoritative order for everyone else to leave the room. This is a deliberate and calculated move to remove any potential witnesses, protectors, or interruptions, creating the private, uncontrolled environment necessary for him to carry out his plan. This command underscores his abuse of princely authority.
  • "And they went out every man from him.": The immediate and complete obedience to Amnon's command underscores his absolute authority as a prince. The attendants leave without question, highlighting Tamar's complete vulnerability and isolation. This compliance seals her fate, leaving her utterly alone with her predator, with no one to intervene or bear witness to the impending crime. This swift departure emphasizes the terrifying effectiveness of Amnon's manipulative power.

Literary Devices

The passage in 2 Samuel 13:9 is rich with Foreshadowing, as Amnon's abrupt refusal to eat and his forceful command for privacy strongly hint at the impending violence, creating a palpable sense of dread for the reader. There is profound Irony at play: Tamar's act of loving and dutiful service, preparing nourishing food for her supposedly sick brother, is tragically met with his malicious intent to harm her. Furthermore, King David's parental concern for Amnon inadvertently places Tamar in extreme danger. The narrative employs Contrast by juxtaposing the domestic, caring scene of Tamar preparing and serving food with the sinister, isolating command that immediately follows. This stark contrast highlights the perversion of familial bonds and hospitality. Finally, the prepared food itself, meant for nourishment and healing, becomes a Symbol of Amnon's deceit, a prop in his destructive scheme, while the removal of "all men" symbolizes the deliberate removal of all moral boundaries, accountability, and the protective presence of community.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse serves as a stark biblical illustration of the insidious nature of sin, particularly when fueled by unchecked lust and enabled by manipulation. It reveals how evil often operates by isolating its victim and removing accountability, preferring darkness to light. The breakdown of David's family, initiated by this act, underscores the devastating consequences of sin, not only for the individual but for the wider community and even future generations. It highlights the importance of guarding one's heart against the very seeds of evil and the critical role of transparency and community in safeguarding against moral transgression. The narrative implicitly warns against the abuse of power and the perversion of trust, demonstrating how authority can be tragically misdirected to serve selfish and destructive ends, leading to profound spiritual and relational decay.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

2 Samuel 13:9 offers a sobering warning about the dangers of creating or seeking environments of isolation for illicit purposes. It compels us to be vigilant against the insidious nature of deception, recognizing that evil often cloaks itself in seemingly innocent requests or circumstances. Amnon's premeditated actions remind us that many grave sins are not spontaneous but are the result of careful planning and the deliberate creation of opportunities, often involving the removal of accountability or witnesses. This should prompt us to examine our own hearts and motives, guarding against the very seeds of evil and the subtle ways temptation can lead us down destructive paths. Furthermore, the verse underscores the profound importance of community and transparency in our lives. The presence of others, particularly within a healthy, accountable spiritual community, can serve as a vital safeguard against sin. Conversely, the deliberate removal of others often signals a move towards darkness, highlighting the value of living in the light and embracing genuine accountability in our relationships and spiritual walk.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Amnon's progression from lust to manipulation to isolation serve as a powerful warning for us today regarding the nature of sin?
  • In what ways might we, or those around us, consciously or unconsciously create "private spaces" that enable sin rather than foster healthy relationships and accountability?
  • What practical safeguards does a healthy community provide against the kind of isolation and unchecked desire that Amnon engineered, and how can we cultivate such community?

FAQ

Why did Amnon refuse to eat the food Tamar prepared?

Answer: Amnon refused to eat the food Tamar prepared because it was an integral part of his elaborate deception. He had feigned illness to lure Tamar to his chambers, knowing that King David would send her to care for him. Once she was there and had completed the act of serving him, the food itself became irrelevant to his true, wicked purpose. His refusal signaled the abandonment of his pretense and the immediate transition to the execution of his plan to sexually assault her. The food was merely a prop in his scheme to isolate her and remove any lingering pretense of his false illness.

What does "Have out all men from me" signify?

Answer: This command signifies Amnon's deliberate and calculated intent to isolate Tamar completely. By ordering "all men" (meaning all servants, attendants, or other individuals present) to leave, he removed any potential witnesses, protectors, or interruptions. This created a private, uncontrolled environment for him to commit his heinous act without immediate interference or observation. It marks the precise moment his deception ended and his true, malevolent design began to unfold. This act of creating absolute privacy is a common tactic for those intending to commit evil deeds, as darkness often prefers to operate unseen and unhindered, as highlighted in John 3:19-20.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic account of Amnon and Tamar, particularly Amnon's calculated isolation of his victim, stands in stark contrast to the character and mission of Jesus Christ. Amnon, consumed by selfish lust and abusing his power, sought to create a private space for sin and destruction, leading to profound brokenness, violence, and ultimately, death within David's household. In stark contrast, Jesus, though possessing all divine power, did not use it for self-gratification or to dominate others, but rather for humble service, self-sacrifice, and the redemption of humanity, as beautifully articulated in Philippians 2:5-8. While Amnon sought isolation for evil, Christ often withdrew to isolated places not for sin, but for prayer and intimate communion with His Father, preparing for redemptive acts that would bring light into the world and minister to others (Luke 5:16; Mark 1:35). Amnon's act brought division and suffering; Christ's ultimate sacrifice on the cross brings reconciliation and healing, breaking down the dividing walls of hostility and offering true peace (Colossians 1:19-20). The darkness that Amnon embraced is utterly overcome by the light of Christ, who came to expose and conquer the works of darkness, offering freedom from the very sin and lust that enslaved Amnon and continues to plague humanity (John 1:5; Romans 6:6-7). Christ's mission was to bring light into the world, exposing and defeating the darkness of sin, unlike Amnon who sought to create darkness for his own evil purposes.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 13 verses 1–20

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here a particular account of the abominable wickedness of Amnon in ravishing his sister, a subject not fit to be enlarged upon nor indeed to be mentioned without blushing, that ever any man should be so vile, especially that a son of David should be so. Amnon's character, we have reason to think, was bad in other things; if he had not forsaken God, he would never have been given up to these vile affections. Godly parents have often been afflicted with wicked children; grace does not run in the blood, but corruption does. We do not find that David's children imitated him in his devotion; but his false steps they trod in, and in those did much worse, and repented not. Parents know not how fatal the consequences may be if in any instance they give their children bad examples. Observe the steps of Amnon's sin.

I. The devil, as an unclean spirit, put it into his heart to lust after his sister Tamar. Beauty is a snare to many; it was so to her. She was fair, and therefore Amnon coveted her, Sa2 13:1. Those that are peculiarly handsome have no reason, on that account, to be proud, but great reason to stand upon their watch. Amnon's lust was, 1. Unnatural in itself, to lust after his sister, which even natural conscience startles at and cannot think of without horror. Such a spirit of contradiction there is in man's corrupt nature that still it desires forbidden fruit, and the more strongly it is forbidden the more greedily it is desired. Can he entertain the thought of betraying that virtue and honour of which, as a brother, he ought to have been the protector? But what wickedness so vile as not to find admittance into an unsanctified unguarded heart, left to itself? 2. It was very uneasy to him. He was so vexed that he could not gain an opportunity to solicit her chastity (for innocent converse with her was not denied him) that he fell sick, Sa2 13:2. Fleshly lusts are their own punishment, and not only war against the soul, but against the body too, and are the rottenness of the bones. See what a hard master sinners serve, and how heavy his yoke is.

II. The devil, as a subtle serpent, put it into his head how to compass this wicked design. Amnon had a friend (so he called him, but he was really an enemy to him), a kinsman, that had in him more of David's blood (for he was his nephew) than of David's spirit, for he was a subtle man, cunning to carry on any bad design, especially an intrigue of this nature, Sa2 13:3.

1.He took notice that Amnon looked ill, and, being a subtle man, concluded that he was love-sick (Sa2 13:4), and asks him, "Why art thou, being the king's son, lean from day to day? Why dost thou pine, being the king's eldest son, and heir to the crown. Being the king's son," (1.) "Thou hast the pleasures of the court to divert thee; take those pleasures then, and with them drive away the sorrow, whatever it is." Content and comfort are not always to be found in royal palaces. With much more reason may we ask dejected and disconsolate saints why they, who are the children of the King of kings and heirs of the crown of life, are thus lean from day to day. (2.) "Thou hast the power of a prince to command what thou wantest and wishest for; use that power therefore, and gratify thyself. Pine not away for that which, lawful or unlawful, thou, being the king's son, mayest have. Quicquid libet licet - Your will is law." Thus Jezebel to Ahab in a like case (Kg1 21:7), Dost not thou govern Israel? The abuse of power is the most dangerous temptation of the great.

2.Amnon having the impudence to own his wicked lust, miscalling it love (I love Tamar), Jonadab put him in a way to compass his design, Sa2 13:5. Had he been what he pretended (Amnon's friend), he would have startled at the mention of such horrid wickedness, would have laid before him the evil of it, what an offence it was to God and what a wrong to his own soul to entertain such a vile thought, of what fatal consequence it would be to him to cherish and prosecute it; he would have used his subtlety to divert Amnon from it, by recommending some other person to him, whom he might lawfully marry. But he seems not at all surprised at it, objects not either the unlawfulness or the difficulty, the reproach or so much as his father's displeasure, but puts him in the way to get Tamar to his bed-side, and then he might do as he pleased. Note, The case of those is very miserable whose friends, instead of admonishing and reproving them, flatter them and forward them in their sinful ways, and are their counsellors and contrivers to do wickedly. Amnon is already sick, but goes about; he must take upon him to be so ill (and his thin looks will give colour enough to the pretence) as not to be able to get up, and to have no appetite to any thing but just that which pleases his fancy. Dainty meat is abhorred, Job 33:20. The best dish from the king's table cannot please him; but, if he can eat any thing, it must be from his sister Tamar's fair hand. This is what he is advised to.

3.Amnon followed these directions, and thus got Tamar within his reach: He made himself sick, Sa2 13:6. Thus he lieth in wait secretly, as a lion in his den, to catch the poor, and to draw them into his net, Psa 10:8-10. David was always fond of his children, and concerned if any thing ailed them; he no sooner hears that Amnon is sick than he comes himself to visit him. Let parents learn hence to be tender of their children and compassionate towards them. The sick child commonly the mother comforteth (Isa 66:13), but let not the father be unconcerned. We may suppose that when David came to see his sick son he gave him good counsel to make a right use of his affliction, and prayed with him, which yet did not alter his wicked purpose. At parting, the indulgent father asks, "Is there any thing thou hast a mind to, that I can procure for thee?" "Yes, Sir," says the dissembling son, "my stomach is weak, and I know not of any thing I can eat, unless it be a cake of my sister Tamar's making, and I cannot be satisfied that it is so unless I see her make it, and it will do me the more good if I eat it at her hand." David saw no reason to suspect any mischief intended. God hid his heart from understanding in this matter. He therefore immediately orders Tamar to go and attend her sick brother, Sa2 13:7. He does it very innocently, but afterwards, no doubt, reflected upon it with great regret. Tamar as innocently goes to her brother's chamber, neither dreading any abuse (why should she from a brother, a sick brother?) nor disdaining, in obedience to her father and love to her brother (though but her half-brother), to be his nurse, Sa2 13:8, Sa2 13:9. Though she was a king's daughter, a great beauty (Sa2 13:1), and well dressed (Sa2 13:18), yet she did not think it below her to knead cakes and bake them, nor would she have done this now if she had not been used to it. Good house-wifery is not a thing below the greatest ladies, nor ought they to think it a disparagement to them. The virtuous woman, whose husband sits among the elders, yet works willingly with her hands, Pro 31:13. Modern ages have not been destitute of such instances, nor is it so unfashionable as some would make it. Preparing for the sick should be more the care and delight of the ladies than preparing for the nice, charity more than curiosity.

4.Having got her to him, he contrives to have her alone; for the adulterer (much more so vile an adulterer as this) is in care that no eye see him, Job 24:15. The meat is ready, but he cannot eat while he is looked at by those about him; they must all be turned out, Sa2 13:9. The sick must be humoured, and think they have a privilege to command. Tamar is willing to humour him; her chaste and virtuous soul has not the least thought of that which his polluted breast is full of; and therefore she makes no scruple of being alone with him in the inner chamber, Sa2 13:10. And now the mask is thrown off, the meat is thrown by, and the wicked wretch calls her sister, and yet impudently courts her to come and lie with him, Sa2 13:11. It was a base affront to her virtue to think it possible to persuade her to consent to such wickedness when he knew her behaviour to be always exemplarily modest and virtuous. But it is common for those that live in uncleanness to think others such as themselves, at least tinder to their sparks.

III. The devil, as a strong tempter, deafens his ear to all the reasonings with which she resisted his assaults and would have persuaded him to desist. We may well imagine what a surprise and terror it was to the young lady to be thus attacked, how she blushed and how she trembled; yet, in this great confusion, nothing could be said more pertinently, nor with greater strength of argument, than what she said to him. 1. She calls him brother, reminding him of the nearness of the relation, which made it unlawful for him to marry her, much more to debauch her. It was expressly forbidden (Lev 18:9) under a severe penalty, Lev 20:17. Great care must be taken lest the love that should be among relations degenerate into lust. 2. She entreats him not to force her, which intimates that she would never consent to it in any degree; and what satisfaction could he take in offering violence? 3. She lays before him the great wickedness of it. It is folly; all sin is so, especially uncleanness. It is wickedness of the worst kind. Such abominations ought not to be committed in Israel, among the professing people of God, that have better statutes than the heathen have. We are Israelites; if we do such things, we are more inexcusable than others, and our condemnation will be more intolerable, for we reproach the Lord, and that worthy name by which we are called. 4. She represents to him the shame of it, which perhaps might influence him more than the sin of it: "For my part, whither shall I cause my shame to go? If it should be concealed, yet I shall blush to think of it as long as I live; and, if ever it be known, how shall I be able to look any of my friends in the face? For thy part, thou shalt be as one of the fools in Israel," that is, "Thou wilt be looked upon as an atrocious debauchee, the worst of men; thou wilt lose thy interest in the esteem of all that are wise and good, and so wilt be set aside as unfit to rule, though the first-born; for Israel will never submit to the government of such a fool." Prospect of shame, especially everlasting shame, should deter us from sin. 5. To divert him from his wicked purpose at this time, and (if possible) to get clear of him, she intimates to him that probably the king, rather than he should die for love of her, would dispense with the divine law and let him marry her: not as if she thought he had such a dispensing power, or would pretend to it; but she was confident that, upon notice given to the king by himself of this wicked desire, which he would scarcely have believed from any one else, he would take an effectual course to protect her from him. But all her arts and all her arguments availed not. His proud spirit cannot bear a denial; but her comfort, and honour, and all that was dear to her, must be sacrificed to his brutish and outrageous lust, Sa2 13:14. It is to be feared that Amnon, though young, had long lived a lewd life, which his father either knew not or punished not; for a man could not, of a sudden, arrive at such a pitch of wickedness as this. But is this his love to Tamar? Is this the recompence he gives her for her readiness to attend him in his sickness? Will he deal with his sister as with a harlot? Base villain! God deliver all that are modest and virtuous from such wicked and unreasonable men.

IV. The devil, as a tormentor and betrayer, immediately turns his love of her into hatred (Sa2 13:15): He hated her with great hatred, greatly, so it is in the margin, and grew as outrageous in his malice as he had been in his lust.

1.He basely turned her out of doors by force; nay, as if he now disdained to touch her with his own hands, he ordered his servant to pull her out and bolt the door after her, Sa2 13:17. Now, (1.) The innocent injured lady had reason to resent this as a great affront, and in some respects (as she says, Sa2 13:16) worse than the former; for nothing could have been done more barbarous and ill-natured, or more disgraceful to her. Had he taken care to conceal what was done, her honour would have been lost to herself only. Had he gone down on his knees and begged her pardon, it might have been some little reparation. Had he given her time to compose herself after the horrid confusion she was put into, she might have kept her countenance when she went out, and so have kept her counsel. But to dismiss her thus hurried, thus rudely, as if she had done some wicked thing, obliged her, in her own defence, to proclaim the wrong that had been done her. (2.) We may learn from it both the malignity of sin (unbridled passions are as bad as unbridled appetites) and the mischievous consequences of sin (at last, it bites like a serpent); for here we find, [1.] That sins, sweet in the commission, afterwards become odious and painful, and the sinner's own conscience makes them so to himself. Amnon hated Tamar because she would not consent to his wickedness, and so take part of the blame upon herself, but to the last resisted it, and reasoned against it, and so threw all the blame upon him. Had he hated the sin, and loathed himself for it, we might have hoped he was penitent. Godly sorrow worketh indignation, Co2 7:11. But to hate the person he had abused showed that his conscience was terrified, but his heart not at all humbled. See what deceitful pleasures those of the flesh are, how soon they pass away, and turn into loathing; see Eze 23:17. [2.] That sins, secret in the commission, afterwards become open and public, and the sinners themselves often make them so. Their own tongues fall upon them. The Jewish doctors say that, upon the occasion of this wickedness of Amnon, a law was made that a young man and a young woman should never be alone together; for, said they, if the king's daughter be so used, what will become of the children of private men?

2.We must now leave the criminal to the terrors of his own guilty conscience, and enquire what becomes of the poor victim. (1.) She bitterly lamented the injury she had received, as it was a stain to her honour, though no real blemish to her virtue. She tore her fine clothes in token of her grief, and put ashes upon her head, to deform herself, loathing her own beauty and ornaments, because they had occasioned Amnon's unlawful love; and she went on crying for another's sin, Sa2 13:19. (2.) She retired to her brother Absalom's house, because he was her own brother, and there she lived in solitude and sorrow, in token of her modesty and detestation of uncleanness. Absalom spoke kindly to her, bade her pass by the injury for the present, designing himself to revenge it, Sa2 13:20. It should seem by Absalom's question (Has Amnon been with thee?) that Amnon was notorious for such lewd practices, so that it was dangerous for a modest woman to be with him; this Absalom might know, and yet Tamar be wholly ignorant of it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–20. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 13:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.