Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Also Judah kept not the commandments of the LORD their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Also Judah H3063 kept H8104 not the commandments H4687 of the LORD H3068 their God H430, but walked H3212 in the statutes H2708 of Israel H3478 which they made H6213.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
(However, neither did Y'hudah obey the mitzvot of ADONAI their God; rather they lived according to the customs of Isra'el.)
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and even Judah did not keep the commandments of the LORD their God, but lived according to the customs Israel had introduced.
Ask
American Standard Version
Also Judah kept not the commandments of Jehovah their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Also Judah didn’t keep the commandments of the LORD their God, but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Yet Iudah kept not the commandements of the Lord their God, but walked according to the facion of Israel, which they vsed.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Also Judah hath not kept the commands of Jehovah their God, and they walk in the statutes of Israel that they had made.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Kings 17:19 delivers a stark indictment of the Southern Kingdom of Judah, highlighting their profound spiritual failure despite witnessing the catastrophic judgment that befell the Northern Kingdom of Israel. This verse reveals Judah's deliberate abandonment of the LORD's divine commandments, choosing instead to adopt and perpetuate the very human-made, apostate practices that had led their sister kingdom to ruin. It underscores Judah's inexcusable culpability and serves as a somber foreshadowing of their own inevitable downfall and exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse appears at a critical juncture in the narrative of 2 Kings. It immediately follows a comprehensive and devastating account of the Assyrian conquest of Samaria and the subsequent exile of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (referred to simply as "Israel" in the text). The preceding verses, particularly 2 Kings 17:7-18, meticulously detail the numerous sins that provoked God's righteous wrath against Israel, including their adoption of pagan customs, rejection of divine statutes, and pervasive idolatry. 2 Kings 17:19 functions as a crucial narrative pivot, shifting the focus from Israel's completed judgment to Judah's ongoing, and equally culpable, spiritual decline. It emphasizes that Judah, despite having the benefit of observing Israel's catastrophic end as a cautionary tale, stubbornly refused to learn from history, thereby setting the stage for their own eventual exile to Babylon, a judgment that would unfold centuries later.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The fall of Samaria and the Northern Kingdom to the Assyrians occurred in 722 BC. At this time, Judah, the Southern Kingdom, remained an independent entity, centered around Jerusalem and the Temple, which was divinely designated as the sole legitimate place of worship for Yahweh. The "statutes of Israel which they made" refer specifically to the idolatrous cultic practices established by Jeroboam I in the North, such as the golden calves at Dan and Bethel, as documented in 1 Kings 12:28-33. These practices represented a direct and egregious violation of the Mosaic covenant, particularly the foundational commands against idolatry found in Exodus 20:3-6. Despite possessing the true sanctuary, the legitimate priesthood, and the Davidic dynasty, Judah was increasingly influenced by these apostate Northern practices, adopting high places, sacred pillars, Asherah poles, and even engaging in child sacrifice, thereby blurring the lines between pure Yahweh worship and pagan syncretism.
  • Key Themes: A central theme is Covenant Disobedience, as Judah, mirroring Israel's actions, deliberately turned away from the explicit laws and commands of the LORD, which formed the very foundation of their covenant relationship established at Mount Sinai (see Exodus 19-24). This disobedience is inextricably linked to Idolatry and Syncretism, as Judah chose to "walk in the statutes of Israel," embracing man-made religious practices that directly contradicted God's revealed will. A profound and tragic theme is the Consequences of Persistent Sin and the Failure to Learn from History. Judah had a vivid, devastating example of divine judgment in the Northern Kingdom's exile, yet they stubbornly refused to repent, demonstrating a profound spiritual blindness and hardening of heart. This also highlights God's Justice and Patience, showing that while His judgment is certain for unrepentant sin, He also extends grace by providing ample warnings and opportunities for repentance, even through the suffering and downfall of others.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • kept not (Hebrew, shâmar', H8104): The verb שָׁמַר (shâmar) fundamentally means "to guard," "to observe," "to keep," or "to preserve." When coupled with the negative particle "lo" (לֹא), it emphatically declares that Judah did not do this. This is not merely a passive oversight or a failure of memory, but an active, deliberate refusal to uphold, protect, and obey the divine commandments. It implies a conscious rejection of their covenant obligations, a failure to guard the precious deposit of God's law entrusted to them, and a willful abandonment of their unique relationship with the LORD.
  • commandments (Hebrew, mitsvâh', H4687): The Hebrew word מִצְוָה (mitsvâh) refers to a divine precept, an authoritative command, or a specific instruction issued by God. These are not suggestions or optional guidelines but binding laws given by the LORD to His people, forming the core of the Mosaic Law. The plural form, "commandments," signifies the comprehensive nature of Judah's failure, encompassing the entirety of God's revealed will, from ethical conduct and social justice to cultic purity and exclusive worship.
  • statutes (Hebrew, chuqqâh', H2708): The term חֻקָּה (chuqqâh) refers to decrees, ordinances, or established customs. In this specific context, the phrase "statutes of Israel which they made" is profoundly significant. It highlights the human origin of these practices, contrasting them sharply with the divine origin of the "commandments of the LORD their God." These "statutes" were the idolatrous, syncretistic, and often morally corrupt practices initiated by the Northern Kingdom's kings (e.g., Jeroboam's golden calves, Baal worship, Asherah poles) that were entirely contrary to God's holy and righteous law.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Also Judah kept not the commandments of the LORD their God": This initial clause directly states Judah's fundamental and culpable failure. Despite being the Southern Kingdom, the inheritors of the Davidic covenant, and the custodians of the Jerusalem Temple, they willfully disobeyed the divine laws given by Yahweh, their covenant God. This act of "not keeping" signifies a profound spiritual rebellion, a deliberate breach of trust, and a betrayal of the unique and sacred relationship they had with the LORD. It reveals a deep-seated spiritual apostasy.
  • "but walked in the statutes of Israel which they made": This second clause elaborates on the nature of Judah's disobedience: they actively adopted the apostate religious practices of the Northern Kingdom. The crucial phrase "which they made" emphasizes that these "statutes" were human inventions, born of human will and idolatrous desires, not divine revelations. Judah chose to follow man-made traditions of idolatry and false worship, practices that had already led to Israel's destruction, rather than adhering to the pure, holy, and life-giving commands of the LORD. This highlights a tragic pattern of spiritual compromise, syncretism, and a profound rejection of divine authority.

Literary Devices

2 Kings 17:19 employs several potent literary devices to convey its somber message. Juxtaposition is central, sharply contrasting "the commandments of the LORD their God" with "the statutes of Israel which they made." This highlights the fundamental difference between divine truth and human invention, between faithful obedience to God and adherence to apostasy. The verse also utilizes powerful Foreshadowing, as Judah's current disobedience, explicitly mirroring Israel's past sins, strongly hints at their own impending judgment and exile, which would culminate in the Babylonian captivity. Furthermore, there is a profound sense of Irony present. Judah, having witnessed the catastrophic downfall of their brethren in the North due to these very "statutes," inexplicably chooses to follow the same destructive path, demonstrating a tragic lack of wisdom, spiritual discernment, and a stubborn refusal to learn from the devastating consequences of sin.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully underscores the unwavering truth that God's covenant demands exclusive loyalty and absolute obedience. The persistent failure of both Israel and Judah to "keep the commandments of the LORD" demonstrates humanity's deep-seated inclination towards idolatry, self-devised worship, and spiritual rebellion—a tendency that inevitably leads to divine judgment. God's justice is not arbitrary or capricious but flows directly from His holy character and His unwavering commitment to His covenant. While He is infinitely patient and long-suffering, there are ultimate and unavoidable consequences for persistent rebellion and a refusal to heed His warnings, even when those warnings come through the suffering and downfall of others. This serves as a timeless reminder that true worship involves humble submission to God's revealed will, not the adoption of culturally convenient or humanly appealing alternatives that contradict His divine precepts.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

2 Kings 17:19 stands as a perpetual and sobering warning against spiritual complacency and the insidious danger of conforming to worldly patterns, even when those patterns are presented as religious, culturally acceptable, or seemingly harmless. Judah's tragic failure to learn from Israel's devastating experience serves as a stark reminder that merely witnessing others' mistakes does not automatically inoculate us against similar temptations or prevent us from falling into the same traps. As believers, we are called to diligently guard our hearts and minds, ensuring that our faith and practice are rooted firmly in the uncompromised truth of God's Word, not in human traditions, fleeting cultural trends, or popular opinions that contradict divine principles. True spiritual health and vitality are found in active, intentional, and wholehearted obedience to the LORD's commandments, recognizing that genuine love for God is profoundly expressed through keeping His word and refusing to walk in "statutes" of our own making or those of a fallen world. This verse compels us to critically examine our own lives, our churches, and our communities, asking whether we are truly keeping God's commandments or subtly adopting "statutes" that lead us astray from His perfect will.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might we, like Judah, be tempted to ignore the clear warnings or devastating consequences of sin observed in others' lives, in history, or even in the present day?
  • What "statutes" or cultural norms in our contemporary society might subtly draw believers away from the explicit "commandments of the LORD their God," perhaps by promoting self-reliance, materialism, or moral relativism?
  • How can we cultivate a deeper, more intentional commitment to obedience that is not merely ritualistic or performative, but flows from a genuine love for God and His revealed Word?
  • What practical steps can we take individually and corporately to ensure our worship, our ethics, and our overall lifestyle are truly aligned with God's commands, rather than conforming to human-made traditions or worldly influences?

FAQ

What specifically were the "statutes of Israel" that Judah adopted, and why were they so offensive to God?

Answer: The "statutes of Israel" primarily refer to the idolatrous religious practices instituted by Jeroboam I in the Northern Kingdom after the division of the monarchy. These included the establishment of golden calves as objects of worship at Bethel and Dan, intended to prevent the people from going to Jerusalem for worship at the true Temple (1 Kings 12:28-30). Over time, these practices expanded to include the worship of foreign deities like Baal and Asherah, the use of high places for pagan rituals, sacred pillars, and Asherah poles, and even horrific practices like child sacrifice, all of which were explicitly and repeatedly forbidden by God's Law (Deuteronomy 12:29-31). These practices were offensive to God because they violated the first two commandments, substituting the worship of the one true God with man-made idols and pagan rituals, thereby breaking the exclusive covenant relationship He had established with Israel. Judah, instead of maintaining pure worship at the Jerusalem Temple, increasingly adopted these syncretistic and pagan elements into their own religious life, demonstrating a profound spiritual compromise.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic failure of both Israel and Judah, epitomized by Judah's stubborn refusal to "keep the commandments of the LORD their God" and their adoption of human-made "statutes," profoundly highlights humanity's inherent inability to perfectly fulfill the divine law. This persistent disobedience, culminating in the exiles of both kingdoms, underscores the deep and desperate need for a new covenant and a perfect Law-keeper. Jesus Christ is the ultimate and complete fulfillment of this need. He alone perfectly kept every commandment of the LORD, living a life of flawless obedience where both Israel and Judah failed (Matthew 5:17). Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, He bore the curse of the law that humanity could not keep (Galatians 3:13), and in His glorious resurrection, He inaugurated the New Covenant prophesied by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 31:31-34). Under this new covenant, the law is no longer merely an external command that humanity consistently fails to keep, but it is supernaturally written upon the hearts of believers by the Holy Spirit, enabling them to genuinely walk in God's statutes and keep His rules, empowered by His grace (Ezekiel 36:27; Romans 8:3-4). Thus, Christ not only fulfills the law on our behalf but also empowers us to live lives of genuine, Spirit-led obedience, overcoming the very spiritual rebellion that plagued Judah.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 17 verses 7–23

Though the destruction of the kingdom of the ten tribes was but briefly related, it is in these verses largely commented upon by our historian, and the reasons of it assigned, not taken from the second causes - the weakness of Israel, their impolitic management, and the strength and growing greatness of the Assyrian monarch (these things are overlooked) - but only from the First Cause. Observe, 1. It was the Lord that removed Israel out of his sight; whoever were the instruments, he was the author of this calamity. It was destruction from the Almighty; the Assyrian was but the rod of his anger, Isa 10:5. It was the Lord that rejected the seed of Israel, else their enemies could not have seized upon them, Kg2 17:20. Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers? Did not the Lord? Isa 43:24. We lose the benefit of national judgments if we do not eye the hand of God in them, and the fulfilling of the scripture, for that also is taken notice of here (Kg2 17:23): The Lord removed Israel out of his favour, and out of their own land, as he had said by all his servants the prophets. Rather shall heaven and earth pass than one tittle of God's word fall to the ground. When God's word and his works are compared, it will be found not only that they agree, but that they illustrate each other. But why would God ruin a people that were raised and incorporated, as Israel was, by miracles and oracles? Why would he undo that which he himself had done at so vast an expense? Was it purely an act of sovereignty? No, it was an act of necessary justice. For, 2. They provoked him to do this by their wickedness. Was it God's doing? Nay, it was their own; by their way and their doings they procured all this to themselves, and it was their own wickedness that did correct them. This the sacred historian shows here at large, that it might appear that God did them no wrong and that others might hear and fear. Come and see what it was that did all this mischief, that broke their power and laid their honour in the dust; it was sin; that, and nothing else, separated between them and God. This is here very movingly laid open as the cause of all the desolations of Israel. He here shows,

I. What God had done for Israel, to engage them to serve him. 1. He gave them their liberty (Kg2 17:7): He brought them from under the hand of Pharaoh who oppressed them, asserted their freedom (Israel is my son), and effected their freedom with a high hand. Thus they were bound in duty and gratitude to be his servants, for he had loosed their bonds; nor would he that rescued them out of the hand of the king of Egypt have contradicted himself so far as to deliver them into the hand of the king of Assyria, as he did, if they had not, by their iniquity, betrayed their liberty and sold themselves. 2. He gave them their law, and was himself their king. They were immediately under a divine regimen. They could not plead ignorance of good and evil, sin and duty, for God had particularly charged them against those very things which here he charges them with (Kg2 17:15), That they should not do like the heathen. Nor could they be in any doubt concerning their obligation to observe the laws which they are here charged with rejecting, for they were the commandments and statutes of the Lord their God (Kg2 17:13), so that no room was left to dispute whether they should keep them or no. He had not dealt so with other nations, Psa 147:19, Psa 147:20. 3. He gave them their land, for he cast out the heathen from before them (Kg2 17:8), to make room for them; and the casting out of them for their idolatries was as fair a warning as could be given to Israel not to do like them.

II. What they had done against God, notwithstanding these engagements which he had laid upon them. 1. In general. They sinned against the Lord their God (Kg2 17:7), they did those things that were not right (Kg2 17:9), but secretly. So wedded were they to their evil practices that when they could not do them publicly, could not for shame or could not for fear, they would do them secretly - an evidence of their atheism, that they thought what was done in secret was from under the eye of God himself and would not be required. Again, they wrought wicked things in such a direct contradiction to the divine law that they seemed as if they were done on purpose to provoke the Lord to anger (Kg2 17:11), in contempt of his authority and defiance of his justice. They rejected God's statutes and his covenant (Kg2 17:15), would not be bound up either by his command or the consent they themselves had given to the covenant, but threw off the obligations of both, and therefore God justly rejected them, Kg2 17:20. See Hos 4:6. They left all the commandments of the Lord their God (Kg2 17:16), left the way, left the work, which those commandments prescribed them and directed them in. Nay, lastly, they sold themselves to do evil in the sight of the Lord, that is, they wholly addicted themselves to sin, as slaves to the service of those to whom they are sold, and, by their obstinately persisting in sin, so hardened their own hearts that at length it had become morally impossible for them to recover themselves, as one that has sold himself has put his liberty past recall. 2. In particular. Though they were guilty (no doubt) of many immoralities, and violated all the commands of the second table, yet nothing is here specified, but their idolatry. This was the sin that did most easily beset them; this was, of all sins, most provoking to God: it was the spiritual adultery that broke the marriage-covenant, and was the inlet of all other wickedness. Hence it is again and again mentioned here as the sin that ruined them. (1.) They feared other gods (Kg2 17:7), that is, worshipped them and paid their homage to them, as if they feared their displeasure. (2.) They walked in the statutes of the heathen, which were contrary to God's statutes (Kg2 17:8), did as did the heathen (Kg2 17:11), went after the heathen that were round about them (Kg2 17:15), so prostituting the honour of their peculiarity, and defeating God's design concerning them, which was that they should be distinguished from the heathen. Must those that were taught of God go to school to the heathen - those that were appropriated to God take their measures from the nations that were abandoned by him? (3.) They walked in the statutes of the idolatrous kings of Israel (Kg2 17:8), in all the sins of Jeroboam, Kg2 17:22. When their kings assumed a power to alter and add to the divine institutions they submitted to them, and thought the command of their kings would bear them out in disobedience to the command of their God. (4.) They built themselves high places in all their cities, Kg2 17:9. If in any place there was but the tower of the watchmen (a country tower that had no walls, but only a tower to shelter the watch in time of danger), or but a lodge for shepherds, it must be honoured with a high place, and that with an altar. If there was a fenced city, it must be further fortified with a high place. Having forsaken God's only place, they knew no end of high places, in which every man followed his own fancy and directed his devotion to what god he pleased. Sacred things were hereby profaned and laid common, when their altars were as heaps in the furrows of the field, Hos 12:11. (5.) They set them up images and groves - Asherim (even wooden images, so some think the term, which we translate groves, should be rendered) or Ashtaroth (so others) - directed contrary to the second commandment, Kg2 17:10. They served idols (Kg2 17:12), the works of their own hands and creatures of their own fancy, though God had warned them particularly not to do this thing. (6.) They burnt incense in all the high places, to the honour of strange gods, for it was to the dishonour of the true God, Kg2 17:11. (7.) They followed vanity. Idols are called so, because they could do neither good nor evil, but were the most insignificant things that could be; those that worshipped them were like unto them, and so they became vain and good for nothing (Kg2 17:16), vain in their devotions, which were brutish and ridiculous, and so became vain in their whole conversation. (8.) Besides the molten images, even the two calves, they worshipped all the host of heaven - the sun, moon, and stars: for it is not meant of the heavenly host of angels; they could not rise so far above sensible things as to think of them. And, withal, they served Baal, the deified heroes of the Gentiles, Kg2 17:16. (9.) They caused their children to pass through the fire, in token of their dedicating them to their idols. (10.) They used divinations and enchantments, that they might receive directions from the gods to whom they paid their devotions.

III. What means God used with them, to bring them off from their idolatries, and to how little purpose. He testified against them, showed them their sins and warned them of the fatal consequences of them by all the prophets and all the seers (for so the prophets had been formerly called), and pressed them to turn from their evil ways, Kg2 17:13. We have read of prophets, more or less, in every reign. Though they had forsaken God's family of priests, he did not leave them without a succession of prophets, who made it their business to teach them the good knowledge of the Lord, but all in vain (Kg2 17:14); they would not hear, but hardened their necks, persisted in their idolatries, and were like their fathers, that would not bow their necks to God's yoke, because they did not believe in him, did not receive his truths, nor would venture upon his promises: it seems to refer to their fathers in the wilderness; the same sin that kept them out of Canaan turned these out, and that was unbelief.

IV. How God punished them for their sins. He was very angry with them (Kg2 17:18); for, in the matter of his worship, he is a jealous God, and resents nothing more deeply than giving that honour to any creature which is due to himself only. He afflicted them (Kg2 17:20) and delivered them into the hand of spoilers, in the days of the judges and of Saul, and afterwards in the days of most of their kings, to see if they would be awakened by the judgments of God to consider and amend their ways; but, when all these corrections did not prevail to drive out the folly, God first rent Israel from the house of David, under which they might have been happy. As Judah was hereby weakened, so Israel was hereby corrupted; for they made a man king who drove them from following the Lord and caused them to sin a great sin, Kg2 17:21. This was a national judgment, and the punishment of their former idolatries; and, at length, he removed them quite out of his sight (Kg2 17:18, Kg2 17:23), without giving them any hopes of a return out of their captivity.

Lastly, Here is a complaint against Judah in the midst of all (Kg2 17:19): Also Judah kept not the commandments of God; though they were not as yet quite so bad as Israel, yet they walked in the statutes of Israel; and this aggravated the sin of Israel, that they communicated the infection of it to Judah; see Eze 23:11. Those that bring sin into a country or family bring a plague into it and will have to answer for all the mischief that follows.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 17:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.