Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Jehoshaphat the son of Paruah, in Issachar:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Jehoshaphat H3092 the son H1121 of Paruah H6515, in Issachar H3485:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Y'hoshafat the son of Paruach, in Yissakhar;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Jehoshaphat son of Paruah in Issachar;
Ask
American Standard Version
Jehoshaphat the son of Paruah, in Issachar;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Jehoshaphat the son of Paruah, in Issachar;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Iehoshaphat the sonne of Paruah in Issachar.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Jehoshaphat Ben-Paruah is in Issachar.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
The Districts of Israel
The Districts of Israel View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,862 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 4:17 introduces Jehoshaphat, son of Paruah, as one of King Solomon's twelve strategically appointed district governors responsible for the region of Issachar. This seemingly administrative detail is a vital component of a larger catalog of officials that profoundly underscores the unprecedented peace, widespread prosperity, and highly organized governance that characterized Solomon's reign, reflecting the tangible fulfillment of God's covenant promises to Israel during this golden age of national flourishing.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is intricately woven into the comprehensive list of Solomon's administrative officials found in 1 Kings 4:7-19. This detailed enumeration immediately follows the profound depiction of Solomon's unparalleled wisdom and understanding, which God graciously granted him (1 Kings 4:29-34). The placement of this administrative record, preceding the accounts of Solomon's monumental building projects—including the magnificent Temple and his opulent palace—serves a crucial narrative purpose. It meticulously illustrates the practical manifestation of Solomon's divinely-imparted wisdom in the realm of governance, showcasing the immense scale of his kingdom's economic and logistical demands and highlighting the centralized control and stability that made such grand endeavors feasible.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Solomon's reign marked a pivotal transformation for Israel, transitioning from a loosely organized tribal confederacy to a highly centralized monarchy boasting a sophisticated bureaucracy. The strategic appointment of twelve district governors represented a pragmatic administrative innovation, meticulously designed to efficiently manage the kingdom's vast resources and ensure a consistent supply chain for the burgeoning royal court in Jerusalem. This intricate system facilitated the systematic collection of taxes, primarily in the form of agricultural produce, from various regions, including the exceptionally fertile Jezreel Valley, which encompassed the tribal territory of Issachar. Such meticulous organization was absolutely essential for sustaining Solomon's vast household, his numerous chariots and horsemen, and the massive workforce engaged in his extensive construction projects, thereby reflecting a period of unparalleled national wealth and profound peace, as vividly described in 1 Kings 4:20-25.

  • Key Themes: The inclusion of Jehoshaphat in this administrative roster significantly contributes to several overarching themes pervasive throughout the book of 1 Kings. Firstly, it emphatically underscores Organized Administration, showcasing Solomon's remarkable administrative acumen and the highly structured nature of his kingdom, a direct testament to the profound wisdom God had bestowed upon him. Secondly, it highlights Royal Provision, underscoring both the immense economic strength and the substantial demands of the royal household, which necessitated a meticulously planned and executed system of supply. This sophisticated system ensured the continuous flow of vital resources essential for the king's court and his ambitious national projects. Lastly, the strategic division of the kingdom into twelve distinct districts, each overseen by a governor like Jehoshaphat, powerfully illustrates Territorial Governance and the comprehensive reach of Solomon's authority across all the tribal territories, including the historically and agriculturally significant region of Issachar, renowned for its fertility, a characteristic alluded to in Jacob's prophetic blessing for Issachar.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • son (Hebrew, bên, H1121): Derived from the root meaning "to build," this term signifies a son as a builder or perpetuator of the family name and lineage. In this administrative context, "son of Paruah" clearly identifies Jehoshaphat's paternal lineage, a standard practice in ancient Near Eastern records to establish individual identity and status within the social and administrative hierarchy. It underscores the importance of family identity in public roles.
  • Jehoshaphat (Hebrew, Yᵉhôwshâphâṭ, H3092): Meaning "Jehovah-judged" or "Yahweh has judged," this name carries theological weight, subtly reminding the reader that even the seemingly mundane details of human governance and administration ultimately operate under the sovereign oversight and righteous judgment of God. While a common name, here it serves to identify a specific individual appointed to a crucial administrative role within Solomon's kingdom.
  • Issachar (Hebrew, Yissâˢkâr, H3485): Meaning "he will bring a reward" or "there is reward," Issachar was one of the twelve tribes of Israel, whose territory was famously fertile, particularly in the Jezreel Valley. Its mention here signifies the specific geographical region over which Jehoshaphat had administrative authority. This detail highlights the comprehensive reach of Solomon's centralized control, ensuring that even the most agriculturally productive regions contributed systematically to the sustenance of the royal government.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Jehoshaphat the son of Paruah": This clause precisely identifies the individual appointed as a district governor. The use of a patronymic ("son of Paruah") was the standard and essential method of distinguishing individuals in ancient Israelite society, clearly indicating his family lineage and establishing his unique identity within the broader social and administrative framework of Solomon's kingdom. It underscores the personal nature of these high-level appointments within the burgeoning bureaucracy.
  • "in Issachar": This phrase definitively specifies the geographical region over which Jehoshaphat was granted administrative authority. It pinpoints the tribal territory of Issachar as his designated district for the crucial purpose of collecting provisions for the king and his vast household. This specific detail underscores the meticulous and systematic division of the kingdom into manageable, resource-rich units, powerfully demonstrating the comprehensive and highly efficient nature of Solomon's centralized governance.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Kings 4:17, as an integral part of the broader administrative list in 1 Kings 4:7-19, is Enumeration. The verse functions as a single entry within a detailed and systematic catalog of Solomon's administrators, serving to methodically list and account for the various officials and their specifically assigned territories. This Conciseness in reporting, characteristic of ancient administrative records, efficiently conveys a significant amount of factual information. While not overtly poetic, the cumulative effect of such lists contributes to the Symbolism of order, stability, and the vast, well-managed extent of Solomon's dominion. The mention of "Issachar" can also be interpreted as a form of Metonymy, where the name of the tribe stands for the geographical region and its abundant agricultural resources, thereby emphasizing the practical function of the governor in drawing provisions from that specific, productive area.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly mundane detail of an administrative appointment in 1 Kings 4:17 carries profound theological weight, illustrating how divine wisdom, when faithfully applied to human governance, invariably leads to order, widespread prosperity, and the tangible fulfillment of God's promises. This verse, embedded within a larger administrative record, powerfully reflects God's abundant blessing upon Solomon's reign, enabling a period of unprecedented peace, stability, and material abundance for the nation of Israel. It profoundly demonstrates that God's meticulous concern extends not only to spiritual matters but also to the practicalities of societal organization and the provision for His people's well-being. The meticulous administration described here is a compelling testament to the truth that even in the logistical intricacies and administrative details of a kingdom, God's guiding hand can be clearly seen, providing essential structure and enabling flourishing for His covenant people.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Kings 4:17 appears as a simple factual statement within a list, its inclusion within the broader narrative of Solomon's reign offers profound and enduring insights for contemporary reflection and application. It powerfully underscores the divine value placed on order, good governance, and efficient administration, not as ends in themselves, but as essential means through which God's blessings can be wisely managed, faithfully stewarded, and sustainably maintained for the flourishing of a community. Solomon's meticulously organized system of provision serves as a timeless reminder of the paramount importance of stewardship—that is, managing the resources, talents, and responsibilities God entrusts to us with profound wisdom, unwavering integrity, and steadfast faithfulness. Whether in our personal lives, within our families, in our workplaces, or within our church communities, the principle of bringing order to chaos, diligently planning for the future, and ensuring equitable distribution of resources is a direct reflection of God's own character as a God of order, not confusion. This passage profoundly encourages us to consider how our own administrative efforts, no matter how seemingly small or insignificant, can contribute meaningfully to the greater good and beautifully reflect God's divine design for a well-ordered existence, thereby enabling us to be faithful channels of His provision and blessing to others.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does this seemingly mundane administrative detail reveal God's active hand in establishing order, stability, and prosperity within a nation?
  • In what specific ways are we, as individuals and communities, called to be exemplary stewards of the resources, responsibilities, and opportunities God has entrusted to us, whether in our homes, workplaces, or broader communities?
  • What enduring lessons can we glean about the critical importance of effective organization, wise planning, and godly leadership from Solomon's example, and how might these principles be faithfully applied to the church today in fulfilling its divine mission?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such detailed lists of administrators like Jehoshaphat?

Answer: The inclusion of detailed administrative lists, such as the one found in 1 Kings 4:7-19, serves multiple vital purposes within the biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully authenticates the historical reality and the immense scale of Solomon's reign, demonstrating the meticulous organization and vast administrative reach of his kingdom. Secondly, these lists highlight the unprecedented peace and profound prosperity that Israel enjoyed under Solomon's rule, thereby fulfilling God's promises of blessing to a righteous king and a obedient nation. Furthermore, they underscore the practical wisdom applied in governance, showing how an efficient system of provision and administration was absolutely essential for sustaining the royal court and ensuring the overall well-being of the nation, as further evidenced by the description of Judah and Israel's widespread prosperity in 1 Kings 4:20.

What was the primary role of these district governors like Jehoshaphat?

Answer: The primary and crucial role of these twelve district governors was to ensure the continuous and reliable provision of food and essential supplies for King Solomon and his extensive royal household. Each governor was specifically responsible for gathering provisions from their assigned district for one month out of the year, operating within a sophisticated rotating system. This intricate logistical arrangement, meticulously described in 1 Kings 4:7, vividly highlights the immense daily demands of the royal court and the kingdom's robust economic strength, which was more than capable of sustaining such a large, complex, and highly organized administrative system.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Kings 4:17 meticulously describes a human king's administrative prowess and the order of his earthly kingdom, it subtly yet profoundly points to the ultimate and perfect administration of God's eternal King, Jesus Christ. Solomon's kingdom, with its remarkable order, abundant provision, and widespread dominion, served as a divine type or shadow, foreshadowing the far greater, everlasting, and perfectly administered kingdom of God. Just as Solomon appointed governors to ensure the well-being and sustenance of his earthly realm, Christ, as the sovereign head of His church, perfectly governs and unfailingly provides for His spiritual kingdom. Indeed, all things were created by Him and for Him, and in Him all things hold together with divine precision (Colossians 1:16-17). He is the ultimate administrator, whose righteous rule is not bound by the limitations of time or geography, and whose provision is not merely physical but profoundly spiritual and eternally sustaining. He is the true bread of life, who provides for His people abundantly and eternally through His very self (John 6:35). Unlike Solomon's kingdom, which eventually divided and fell due to human sin and imperfection, Christ's kingdom is an everlasting dominion, and of His government there will be no end (Isaiah 9:7). Through His perfect sacrificial death and glorious resurrection, He has secured an eternal inheritance for His people, making Him the ultimate and flawless fulfillment of all earthly kings and their imperfect attempts at righteous rule and divine provision.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 4 verses 1–19

Here we have,

I. Solomon upon his throne (Kg1 4:1): So king Solomon was king, that is, he was confirmed and established king over all Israel, and not, as his successors, only over two tribes. He was a king, that is, he did the work and duty of a king, with the wisdom God had given him. Those preserve the name and honour of their place that mind the business of it and make conscience of it.

II. The great officers of his court, in the choice of whom, no doubt, his wisdom much appeared. It is observable, 1. That several of them are the same that were in his father's time. Zadok and Abiathar were then priests (Sa2 20:25), so they were now; only then Abiathar had the precedency, now Zadok. Jehoshaphat was then recorder, or keeper of the great seal, so he was now. Benaiah, in his father's time, was a principal man in military affairs, and so he was now. Shisha was his father's scribe, and his sons were his, Kg1 4:3. Solomon, though a wise man, would not affect to be wiser than his father in this matter. When sons come to inherit their father's wealth, honour, and power, it is a piece of respect to their memory, caeteris paribus - where it can properly be done, to employ those whom they employed, and trust those whom they trusted. Many pride themselves in being the reverse of their good parents. 2. The rest were priests' sons. His prime-minister of state was Azariah the son of Zadok the priest. Two others of the first rank were the sons of Nathan the prophet, Kg1 4:5. In preferring them he testified the grateful respect he had for their good father, whom he loved in the name of a prophet.

III. The purveyors for his household, whose business it was to send in provisions from several parts of the country, for the king's tables and cellars (Kg1 4:7) and for his stables (Kg1 4:27, Kg1 4:28), that thus, 1. His house might always be well furnished at the best hand. Let great men learn hence good house-keeping, to be generous in spending according to their ability, but prudent in providing. It is the character of the virtuous woman that she bringeth her food from afar (Pro 31:14), not far-fetched and dear-bought, but the contrary, every thing bought where it is cheapest. 2. That thus he himself, and those who immediately attended him, might be eased of a great deal of care, and the more closely apply themselves to the business of the state, not troubled about much serving, provision for that being got ready to their hand. 3. That thus all the parts of the kingdom might be equally benefited by the taking off of the commodities that were the productions of their country and the circulating of the coin. Industry would hereby be encouraged, and consequently wealth increased, even in those tribes that lay most remote from the court. The providence of God extends itself to all places of his dominions (Psa 103:22); so should the prudence and care of princes. 4. The dividing of this trust into so many hands was prudent, that no man might be continually burdened with the care of it nor grow exorbitantly rich with the profit of it, but that Solomon might have those, in every district, who, having a dependence upon the court, would be serviceable to him and his interest as there was occasion. These commissioners of the victualling-office, not for the army or navy (Solomon was engaged in no war), but for the household, are here named, several of them only by their surnames, as great men commonly call their servants: Ben-hur, Ben-dekar, etc., though several of them have also their proper names prefixed. Two of them married Solomon's daughters, Ben-Abinadab (Kg1 4:11) and Ahimaaz (Kg1 4:15), and no disparagement to them to marry men of business. Better match with the officers of their father's court that were Israelites than with the sons of princes that were strangers to the covenant of promise. The son of Geber was in Ramoth-Gilead (Kg1 4:19), and Geber himself was in the country of Sihon and Og, which included that and Mahanaim, Kg1 4:14. He is therefore said to be the only officer in that land, because the other two, mentioned Kg1 4:13, Kg1 4:14, depended on him, and were subordinate to him.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
ON THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS 4:1
The officials elected by Solomon designate the order of the chosen ones whom Christ affirmed in his grace and appointed as rulers of his people. Indeed, twelve prefects were selected to administer the incomes of this king and his house, because just as many apostles had to be distributed over the entire world and had to be appointed as treasures of the divine mysteries, so that they might nourish with living and immortal food the Israel of God and might administer the incomes of the house of the peaceful king. Therefore, also the limits of each prefecture were clearly denoted, because, in a similar way, each apostle received a certain province: Simon preached in Rome, John in Ephesus, Matthew in Palestine and Thomas in the region of India.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 4:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.