Skip to content

1 Corinthians 8:7

“The Truth About Idols and God”1 Corinthians 8:4–8

King James Version
Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Howbeit G235 there is not G3756 in G1722 every man G3956 that knowledge G1108: for G1161 some G5100 with conscience G4893 of the idol G1497 unto G2193 this hour G737 eat G2068 it as G5613 a thing offered unto an idol G1494; and G2532 their G846 conscience G4893 being G5607 weak G772 is defiled G3435.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
But not everyone has this knowledge. Some people are still so accustomed to idols that they eat such food as if it were sacrificed to an idol. And since their conscience is weak, it is defiled.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Howbeit there is not in all men that knowledge: but some, being used until now to the idol, eat as of a thing sacrificed to an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
However, that knowledge isn’t in all men. But some, with consciousness of the idol until now, eat as of a thing sacrificed to an idol, and their conscience, being weak, is defiled.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
But euery man hath not that knowledge: for many hauing conscience of the idole, vntill this houre, eate as a thing sacrificed vnto the idole, and so their conscience being weake, is defiled.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
but not in all men is the knowledge, and certain with conscience of the idol, till now, as a thing sacrificed to an idol do eat it , and their conscience, being weak, is defiled.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
24 Greek words
  1. ἀλλ᾽all᾽ButG235CONJConjunction
  2. οὐκouknotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  3. ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
  4. πᾶσινpasinall [is]G3956A-DPMAdjective Dative Plural Masculine
  5. ἡhēthisG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
  6. γνῶσις·gnōsisknowledgeG1108N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  7. τινὲςtinesSomeG5100X-NPMIndefinite pronoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  8. δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
  9. τῇtēa[the]G3588T-DSFDefinite article Dative Singular Feminine
  10. συνηθείᾳsunētheiaby customG4914N-DSFNoun Dative Singular Feminine
  11. ἕωςhe'ōsuntilG2193PREPPreposition
  12. ἄρτιartinowG737ADVAdverb
  13. τοῦtouof theG3588T-GSNDefinite article Genitive Singular Neuter
  14. εἰδώλουeidōlouidolG1497N-GSNNoun Genitive Singular Neuter
  15. ὡςhōsas ofG5613PRTParticle or Disjunctive
  16. εἰδωλόθυτονeidōlothutonan idol-sacrificeG1494A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
  17. ἐσθίουσινesthiousineatG2068V-PAI-3PVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  18. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  19. ἡhētheG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
  20. συνείδησιςsuneidēsisconscienceG4893N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  21. αὐτῶνautōnof themG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  22. ἀσθενὴςasthenēsweakG772A-NSFAdjective Nominative Singular Feminine
  23. οὖσαousabeingG1510V-PAP-NSFVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Feminine
  24. μολύνεταιmolunetaiit is defiledG3435V-PPI-3SVerb Present Passive Indicative 3rd Singular
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 28,535 of 31,102 · 91.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Some believers still eat sacrificed meat as something belonging to the idol, and eating against their weak conscience leaves it defiled.

“Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge:”

The truth of verses 4–6 is held by some and still missing in others.

“for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour”

Even now, after coming to faith, they still sense the idol in the meat.

“eat it as a thing offered unto an idol;”

They eat with the feeling of taking part in idol worship.

“and their conscience being weak is defiled.”

Acting against their own conviction stains a conscience that is still growing.

Passage study1 Corinthians 8:4–8

The Truth About Idols and God

4As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. 5For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) 6But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. 7Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled. 8But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.

Summary

Paul answers a question the church at Corinth met at every market stall and dinner table: may a believer eat meat that has been offered to an idol? He starts from what believers know. An idol is nothing in the world, and there is none other God but one. Many beings are called gods and lords, in heaven and on earth, yet to us there is one God, the Father, from whom all things come and for whom we live, and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom all things exist and through whom we live. Paul then adds that this knowledge is still missing in some believers, who eat the meat as the idol’s own, and their weak conscience is defiled. Food itself leaves us as we were before God, whether we eat or abstain. In five verses we have one of the clearest confessions of God in the New Testament, set beside a tender concern for the brother whose faith is still growing.

Why meat offered to idols troubled the church at Corinth

Corinth was a busy, cosmopolitan port and a Roman provincial capital, full of temples to gods such as Aphrodite, Apollo, Poseidon and Asclepius, along with cults that honoured the emperors as gods. Animal sacrifice ran through its religious, social and civic life. Part of a sacrificed animal was usually eaten by the worshippers, part went to the priests, and the rest was sold in the public meat markets, the macella. So meat from the altars reached the butcher’s stall, the private banquet and the feasts held in temple grounds, and a believer who bought meat or accepted an invitation to dinner faced a real question. For converts from paganism, eating it could stir up everything they had left behind. Others, confident that the idols were nothing, ate it freely.

Paul takes the matter up across 1 Corinthians 8–10. He opens with a warning, “Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth” (1 Corinthians 8:1), and that warning governs everything in these verses. Verses 4–6 set out what believers know about idols and about God, verses 7–8 turn to the believers who still lack that knowledge and to where food stands before God, and 1 Corinthians 8:9–13 asks those who know to use their freedom in love. The whole discussion ends with “whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31). Paul handles the same kind of question in Romans 14.

An idol is nothing, and God is one

The words “as concerning therefore” bring Paul back to the subject he raised in verse 1. The particle oûn, “therefore”, marks the next step in his thought. His subject is the brōsis of things offered to idols, the eating of them. The noun comes from the base of bibrōskō, “to eat”, and is the everyday word for eating, which keeps this great teaching about God tied to an ordinary meal. “Those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols” are one word in Greek, eidōlóthyton, an idol-sacrifice, part of an offering made to a pagan god.

“We know” uses eídō, a verb that properly means to see and is used figuratively for knowing. Paul speaks for every believer who shares this understanding, and he names two things they know.

The first is that “an idol is nothing in the world”. An eídōlon is an image made for worship, and by implication the heathen god it stands for. Paul joins it to oudeís, “nothing”. The image is a made object, and the god it represents is empty of divine being and of spiritual power. Because the idol is “nothing”, believers are free from fear of the gods of the city and of the meat that was offered to them.

The second is that “there is none other God but one”, and this is the ground of the first. The Greek runs oudeís héteros theós ei mḗ heîs, “no other God except one”. Héteros means “other” or “another”, ei mḗ means “if not”, “except” or “save”, and heîs is the numeral one. This is the faith of Israel, which confesses that the LORD is one (Deuteronomy 6:4). It is the faith Isaiah heard from the LORD himself: “I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God” (Isaiah 44:6). In the same chapter Isaiah sets out at length the folly of making and worshipping idols (Isaiah 44:9–20). Against all the gods of Corinth stands this one God, and he alone is worthy of worship and allegiance.

Who are the “gods many, and lords many”?

Paul grants what anyone walking through Corinth could see: “there be that are called gods”. The verb is légō, to lay out in words, to say, and here to call or name. These beings are gods by name, named so by the people who worship them, and Paul leaves the title with those who give it. The word for god, theós, is the common noun for a deity. With the article it usually means the one supreme God, and the New Testament also uses it, as here, for the gods of the nations.

“Whether in heaven or in earth” takes in the whole range of them. In the heavens were the Olympian gods such as Zeus, Apollo and Aphrodite, the gods of the stars and the figures of myth, and on earth were local spirits, heroes raised to divine honour, and rulers who claimed divine status. The word for lord, kýrios, means one supreme in authority, a master or controller. It was used of powerful gods, of emperors made divine (Caesar was often worshipped as “Lord”) and of men who held great power and commanded loyalty. The words in brackets, “(as there be gods many, and lords many)”, press home how crowded the pagan world was with names demanding worship, and they prepare for the “one God” and “one Lord” of the next verse. The psalmist had already said, “For all the gods of the nations are idols: but the LORD made the heavens” (Psalm 96:5).

Does Paul believe these gods are real?

Paul is describing what people believed and practised, and in verse 4 he has already said that an idol is “nothing” and that there is none other God but one. Later in the same letter, though, he warns that sacrifices offered to idols are in fact offered to demons (1 Corinthians 10:20). So the idol itself is empty, while deceiving spiritual forces can be at work behind the worship given to it. Christ has triumphed over every such principality and power (Colossians 2:15).

One God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ

“But to us” sets the confession of believers over against every god and lord that people name. Heîs, the same numeral as in verse 4, stands at the head of both halves of it: “one God, the Father” and “one Lord Jesus Christ”. Here the Shema’s one God is confessed by a church in a city of many gods, and Paul speaks elsewhere of “One God and Father of all” (Ephesians 4:6).

The Father is the one “of whom are all things”. The preposition is ek, “from” or “out of”, so all that exists comes from him as its source. “And we in him” is in Greek hēmeis eis auton, “we unto him”, and it speaks of direction. We live toward the Father and for his purpose. He is where all things come from and where our lives are headed.

“One Lord Jesus Christ” gives Jesus the title Kyrios, the word the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, often uses for the LORD. Set beside the “lords many” of verse 5, it gives Jesus the authority and the divine standing that belong to God. “By whom are all things” uses diá, “through”, which here marks the channel or means by which something is done. All things were made through the Son and continue to exist through him. John says the same of the Word (John 1:3), and Paul calls Christ the image of the invisible God, by whom all things were created and in whom all things hold together (Colossians 1:15–17).

“And we by him”, hēmeis di’ autou, carries the same truth into our own lives. Our creation, our redemption and our daily life with God all come to us through Christ. He is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), the mediator of the new testament (Hebrews 9:15), and the one through whom we have access by one Spirit to the Father (Ephesians 2:18).

Every lord of Corinth stands below this one Lord. God has given Jesus the name above every name, so that every knee in heaven and on earth should bow to him and every tongue confess that he is Lord (Philippians 2:9–11). He is head over every rule and authority (Colossians 2:10), and after his resurrection he said that “all power” had been given to him “in heaven and in earth” (Matthew 28:18), the same two realms where verse 5 places the gods and lords of the nations.

Why “of whom” for the Father and “by whom” for the Son?

The two prepositions show the Father as the source from whom all things come and the Son as the one through whom the Father’s creative will is carried out. Both stand inside the one confession of one God, and the Son shares in the work of creation that belongs to God alone. The difference is one of role within the one God, and it leaves the Son equal with the Father in being and in power. Because the Son was at work in creation, this verse also shows that he existed before he came into the world, which sets him above every prophet and teacher as the divine Lord. Long before the church set its teaching about the Trinity into words, Paul names the Father and the Son together within the one God.

Some believers still eat with the idol in mind

“Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge” turns from what is true to who has grasped it. Gnōsis, “knowledge”, means knowing, here the understanding that idols are powerless and that food offered to them is undefiled in itself. Paul had it, and so did many in Corinth, but some in the church still lacked it.

These are believers who eat “with conscience of the idol unto this hour”. They were most likely recent converts from paganism, and even now, after coming to faith, the idol is still real to them when the meat is on the table. They eat it “as a thing offered unto an idol” (eidōlóthyton again), feeling that they are taking part in the worship they once gave. The word for conscience, syneídēsis, means co-perception or moral consciousness, the inner sense that discerns right from wrong and holds us to our own convictions. Their conscience is asthenḗs, “weak”, still being formed by the freeing truth of verses 4–6, and when they eat against it, it is “defiled”, molýnō, soiled or stained.

What is a weak conscience, and how is it defiled?

A weak conscience belongs to a believer whose understanding is still growing, often because the associations of a former life still cling to it. Such a believer feels that eating the meat compromises their faith, even though the idol is “nothing”. The stain comes when they act against their own conviction. They feel guilt and inner conflict, their peace is disturbed and their growth is hindered, while the food on the plate stays exactly what it was.

A weak conscience is often a stage of growth, and through the rest of 1 Corinthians 8 Paul treats these brothers and sisters with compassion, as people open to real spiritual harm. Their understanding may be incomplete, yet their conscience still deserves respect, because overriding it would lead them into sin. Paul gives the same charge to the Romans, to receive the one who is weak in the faith (Romans 14:1–3).

Food does not commend us to God

The KJV’s “meat” is brōma, which means food of any kind, especially foods allowed or forbidden by the Jewish law. Here it is the sacrificed meat in question at Corinth. The verb “commendeth” is parístēmi, to stand beside, to present or to recommend, so Paul’s point is that our acceptance with God is untouched by what we eat. He explains it in two balanced clauses. “If we eat, are we the better” uses perisseúō, to abound or excel, and “if we eat not, are we the worse” uses hysteréō, to come behind, to fall short or be lacking. Eating brings us no gain in righteousness or favour, and abstaining brings no loss. Both acts are, in themselves, matters indifferent before God, what has long been called adiaphora.

Jesus taught the same when he said, “not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man” (Matthew 15:11). Paul tells the Romans that “the kingdom of God is not meat and drink” (Romans 14:17), and he warns the Colossians against letting anyone judge them over food or drink (Colossians 2:16–17). Our standing before God is a gift of grace, received by faith in Christ, whose sacrifice made us righteous in God’s sight (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Does this verse make every outward action unimportant?

Verse 8 is about food and our standing with God, and Paul goes straight on to show how much our use of freedom matters to others. Eating may be neutral in itself, yet eating in a way that leads a brother with a weak conscience to act against it is sin against Christ (1 Corinthians 8:12). In this same discussion Paul writes, “all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not”, and he asks each believer to seek the good of others (1 Corinthians 10:23–24). So verse 8 sets us free from rules about food, and it opens the way to the love that the rest of the chapter asks for.

Knowledge that makes room for love

The confession of verses 4–6 is good news for everyone who once lived under many masters. There is one God, from whom we came and to whom we go, and one Lord, through whom we live. Every other power that claims our worship is a god only in the mouths of those who serve it. Our own world has its gods many and lords many in wealth, power, fame, career, self-fulfilment, political causes and even technology, and each promises a security and a life that belong to God alone.

Paul sets this glorious knowledge beside a brother who is still weak. The same Lord through whom all things exist “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant” (Philippians 2:5–8), and he “came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28). The strong in Corinth were asked to follow him, bearing the infirmities of the weak and pleasing others before themselves (Romans 15:1), and keeping every stumbling block out of a brother’s way (Romans 14:13). The truth about idols sets us free, and love decides how that freedom is used, as Paul shows at length in 1 Corinthians 13. The one God and the Lord who gave himself are honoured when knowledge serves love in the church.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 8:7–13.

1662–1714 · 7 verses
Passage under comment1 Corinthians 8:7–13

The apostle, having granted, and indeed confirmed, the opinion of some among the Corinthians, that idols were nothing, proceeds now to show them that their inference from this assumption was not just, namely, that therefore they might go into the idol-temple, and eat of the sacrifices, and feast there with their heathen neighbours. He does not indeed here so much insist upon the unlawfulness of the thing in itself as the mischief such freedom might do to weaker Christians, persons that had not the same measure of knowledge with these pretenders. And here,

I.He informs them that every Christian man, at that time, was not so fully convinced and persuaded that an idol was nothing.

Howbeit, there is not in every man this knowledge; for some, with conscience of the idol, unto this hour, eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; with conscience of the idol; that is, some confused veneration for it. Though they were converts to Christianity, and professed the true religion, they were not perfectly cured of the old leaven, but retained an unaccountable respect for the idols they had worshipped before. Note, Weak Christians may be ignorant, or have but a confused knowledge of the greatest and plainest truths. Such were those of the one God and one Mediator. And yet some of those who were turned form heathenism to Christianity among the Corinthians seem to have retained a veneration for their idols, utterly irreconcilable with those great principles; so that when an opportunity offered to eat things offered to idols they did not abstain, to testify their abhorrence of idolatry, nor eat with a professed contempt of the idol, by declaring they looked upon it to be nothing; and so their conscience, being weak, was defiled; that is, they contracted guilt; they ate out of respect to the idol, with an imagination that it had something divine in it, and so committed idolatry: whereas the design of the gospel was to turn men from dumb idols to the living God. They were weak in their understanding, not thoroughly apprized of the vanity of idols; and, while they ate what was sacrificed to them out of veneration for them, contracted the guilt of idolatry, and so greatly polluted themselves. This seems to be the sense of the place; though some understand it of weak Christians defiling themselves by eating what was offered to an idol with an apprehension that thereby it became unclean, and made those so in a moral sense who should eat it, every one not having a knowledge that the idol was nothing, and therefore that it could not render what was offered to it in this sense unclean. Note, We should be careful to do nothing that may occasion weak Christians to defile their consciences.

II.He tells them that mere eating and drinking had nothing in them virtuous nor criminal, nothing that could make them better nor worse, pleasing nor displeasing to God: Meat commendeth us not to God; for neither if we eat are we the better, nor if we eat not are we the worse, 1 Corinthians 8:8. It looks as if some of the Corinthians made a merit of their eating what had been offered to idols, and that in their very temples too (1 Corinthians 8:10), because it plainly showed that they thought the idols nothing. But eating and drinking are in themselves actions indifferent. It matters little what we eat. What goes into the man of this sort neither purifies nor defiles. Flesh offered to idols may in itself be as proper for food as any other; and the bare eating, or forbearing to eat, has no virtue in it. Note, It is a gross mistake to think that distinction of food will make any distinction between men in God's account. Eating this food, and forbearing that, having nothing in them to recommend a person to God.

III.He cautions them against abusing their liberty, the liberty they thought they had in this matter.

For that they mistook this matter, and had no allowance to sit at meat in the idol's temple, seems plain from 1 Corinthians 10:20, etc. But the apostle argues here that, even upon the supposition that they had such power, they must be cautious how they use it; it might be a stumbling-block to the weak (1 Corinthians 10:9), it might occasion their falling into idolatrous actions, perhaps their falling off from Christianity and revolting again to heathenism. "If a man see thee, who hast knowledge (hast superior understanding to his, and hereupon concedest that thou hast a liberty to sit at meat, or feast, in an idol's temple, because an idol, thou sayest, is nothing), shall not one who is less thoroughly informed in this matter, and thinks an idol something, be emboldened to eat what was offered to the idol, not as common food, but sacrifice, and thereby be guilty of idolatry?" Such an occasion of falling they should be careful of laying before their weak brethren, whatever liberty or power they themselves had. The apostle backs this caution with two considerations: - 1. The danger that might accrue to weak brethren, even those weak brethren for whom Christ died. We must deny ourselves even what is lawful rather than occasion their stumbling, and endanger their souls (1 Corinthians 10:11): Through thy knowledge shall thy weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? Note, Those whom Christ hath redeemed with his most precious blood should be very precious and dear to us. If he had such compassion as to die for them, that they might not perish, we should have so much compassion for them as to deny ourselves, for their sakes, in various instances, and not use our liberty to their hurt, to occasion their stumbling, or hazard their ruin. That man has very little of the spirit of the Redeemer who had rather his brother should perish than himself be abridged, in any respect, of his liberty. He who hath the Spirit of Christ in him will love those whom Christ loved, so as to die for them, and will study to promote their spiritual and eternal warfare, and shun every thing that would unnecessarily grieve them, and much more every thing that would be likely to occasion their stumbling, or falling into sin. 2. The hurt done to them Christ takes as done to himself: When you sin so against the weak brethren and wound their consciences, you sin against Christ, 1 Corinthians 10:12. Note, Injuries done to Christians are injuries to Christ, especially to babes in Christ, to weak Christians; and most of all, involving them in guilt: wounding their consciences is wounding him. He has a particular care of the lambs of the flock: He gathers them in his arm and carries them in his bosom, Isaiah 60:11. Strong Christians should be very careful to avoid what will offend weak ones, or lay a stumbling-block in their way. Shall we be void of compassion for those to whom Christ has shown so much? Shall we sin against Christ who suffered for us? Shall we set ourselves to defeat his gracious designs, and help to ruin those whom he died to save?

IV.He enforces all with his own example (1 Corinthians 8:13):

Wherefore if meat make my brother to offend I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend. He does not say that he will never eat more. This were to destroy himself, and to commit a heinous sin, to prevent the sin and fall of a brother. Such evil must not be done that good may come of it. But, though it was necessary to eat, it was not necessary to eat flesh. And therefore, rather than occasion sin in a brother, he would abstain from it as long as he lived. He had such a value for the soul of his brother that he would willingly deny himself in a matter of liberty, and forbear any particular food, which he might have lawfully eaten and might like to eat, rather than lay a stumbling-block in a weak brother's way, and occasion him to sin, by following his example, without being clear in his mind whether it were lawful or no. Note, We should be very tender of doing any thing that may be an occasion of stumbling to others, though it may be innocent in itself. Liberty is valuable, but the weakness of a brother should induce, and sometimes bind, us to waive it. We must not rigorously claim nor use our own rights, to the hurt and ruin of a brother's soul, and so to the injury of our Redeemer, who died for him. When it is certainly foreseen that my doing what I may forbear will occasion a fellow-christian to do what he ought to forbear, I shall offend, scandalize, or lay a stumbling-block in his way, which to do is a sin, however lawful the thing itself be which is done. And, if we must be so careful not to occasion other men's sins, how careful should we be to avoid sin ourselves! If we must not endanger other men's souls, how much should we be concerned not to destroy our own!

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 215–407
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

We must therefore abstain from these viands not for fear (because there is no power in them); but on account of our conscience, which is holy, and out of detestation of the demons to which they are dedicated, are we to loathe them; and further, on account of the instability of those who regard many things in a way that makes them prone to fall, "whose conscience, being weak, is defiled: for meat commendeth us not to God."
d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Modesty
But, so sinning, by shocking the weak consciences of the brethren thoroughly, they will sin against Christ." By this time, indeed, (he mentions individuals) by name: "Or have we not a power of eating.
"But not in all is knowledge," saith he. What knowledge doth he mean? about God, or about things offered in sacrifice to idols? For either he here glances at the Greeks who say that there are many gods and lords, and who know not Him that is truly God; or at the converts from among Greeks who were still rather infirm, such as did not yet know clearly that they ought not to fear idols and that "an idol is nothing in the world." But in saying this, he gently soothes and encourages the latter. For there was no need of mentioning all he had to reprove, particularly as he intended to visit them again with more severity.

"But some being used to the idol eat as of a thing sacrificed to an idol, and their conscience being weak is defiled." They still tremble at idols, he saith. For tell me not of the present establishment, and that you have received the true religion from your ancestors. But carry back your thoughts to those times, and consider when the Gospel was just set on foot, and impiety was still at its height, and altars burning, and sacrifices and libations offering up, and the greater part of men were Gentiles; think, I say, of those who from their ancestors had received impiety, and who were the descendants of fathers and grandfathers and great-grandfathers like themselves, and who had suffered great miseries from the demons. How must they have felt after their sudden change! How would they face and tremble at the assaults of the demons! For their sake also he employs some reserve, saying, "But some with conscience of the things sacrificed to an idol." Thus he neither exposed them openly, not to strike them hard; nor doth he pass by them altogether: but makes mention of them in a vague manner, saying, "Now some with conscience of the idol even until now eat as of a thing sacrificed to an idol; that is, with the same thoughts as they did in former times: 'and their conscience being weak is defiled;'" not yet being able to despise and once for all laugh them to scorn, but still in some doubt. Just as if a man were to think that by touching a dead body he should pollute himself according to the Jewish custom, and then seeing others touching it with a clear conscience, but not with the same mind touching it himself, would be polluted. This was their state of feeling at that time. "For some," saith he, "with conscience of the idol do it even until now." Not without cause did he add, "even until now;" but to signify that they gained no ground by their refusing to condescend. For this was not the way to bring them in, but in some other way persuading them by word and by teaching.

"And their conscience being weak is defiled." No where as yet doth he state his argument about the nature of the thing, but turns himself this way and that as concerning the conscience of the person partaking. For he was afraid lest in his wish to correct the weak person, he should inflict a heavy blow upon the strong one, and make him also weak. On which account he spares the one no less than the other. Nor doth he allow the thing itself to be thought of any consequence, but makes his argument very full to prevent any suspicion of the kind.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 8:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8