Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of his brother Helem; Zophah, and Imna, and Shelesh, and Amal.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of his brother H251 Helem H1987; Zophah H6690, and Imna H3234, and Shelesh H8028, and Amal H6000.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of his brother Helem were: Zofach, Yimnah, Shelesh and 'Amal.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of his brother Helem: Zophah, Imna, Shelesh, and Amal.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Helem his brother: Zophah, and Imna, and Shelesh, and Amal.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Helem his brother: Zophah, and Imna, and Shelesh, and Amal.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of his brother Helem were Zophah, and Iimna, and Shelesh and Amal.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And son of Helem his brother: Zophah, and Imna, and Shelesh, and Amal.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,571 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:35 is a concise verse nestled within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Asher, meticulously detailing four of Helem's sons: Zophah, Imna, Shelesh, and Amal. This seemingly simple listing serves a profound purpose, meticulously documenting the lineage of one of Israel's twelve tribes, reinforcing the historical continuity and tribal identity of God's covenant people. It underscores the Chronicler's commitment to preserving ancestral lines, which were foundational for land inheritance, social structure, and the broader narrative of God's unwavering faithfulness to His promises, even after significant national upheaval.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 7:35 is situated within the expansive genealogical section that opens the First Book of Chronicles, spanning chapters 1 through 9. This particular verse forms part of the detailed tribal records for Asher, which commences in 1 Chronicles 7:30 and extends through 1 Chronicles 7:40. The Chronicler's overarching purpose in compiling these extensive lists was to re-establish the identity and continuity of post-exilic Israel with their pre-exilic heritage, emphasizing their unbroken covenant relationship with God. Following the genealogies of other prominent tribes like Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh, the meticulous listing of Asher's descendants, including Helem's sons, contributes to the comprehensive reconstruction of Israel's family tree, designed to affirm their place in God's ongoing redemptive story.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The First Book of Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period, around the 5th or 4th century BC, a time when the Jewish community had returned from Babylonian captivity and was actively engaged in rebuilding Jerusalem and its religious life. In ancient Israelite society, genealogies were far more than mere lists of names; they functioned as vital legal, social, and religious documents. They established tribal affiliation, which directly determined land rights (as meticulously outlined in Numbers 26), eligibility for priestly service (a critical concern for the Levites, as evidenced in Ezra 2:61-63), and overall social standing within the community. The meticulous preservation of these records reflected a deep cultural value placed on heritage, ensuring that the covenant promises made to Abraham and his descendants could be traced and affirmed through the generations, providing stability and identity amidst national restoration.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of this verse, along with the broader genealogical sections, highlights several foundational themes central to the Chronicler's theological message. Firstly, it underscores God's meticulousness and sovereign oversight, demonstrating His detailed knowledge of and care for every individual within His covenant people, even those whose names appear briefly in a list. This divine attention to detail assures Israel of their enduring significance to God. Secondly, it emphasizes the importance of heritage and continuity for Israel's identity; their present and future were inextricably linked to their past, deeply rooted in the promises made to their forefathers (e.g., Genesis 12:1-3). The genealogies served as a tangible link across generations. Thirdly, these lists serve as a powerful testament to God's faithfulness in preserving His people despite exile, dispersion, and national upheaval, ensuring the unbroken lineage through which His redemptive plan would unfold, ultimately leading to the Messiah (as seen in the Chronicler's profound emphasis on David's line in 1 Chronicles 17).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Helem (Hebrew, ḥelem', H1987): Meaning "smiter." This name identifies the father of the four sons listed in the verse. While the etymological meaning of "smiter" does not carry explicit theological weight in this specific genealogical context, its inclusion is crucial. It signifies the individual's precise place within the tribal structure of Asher, serving as a specific link in the chain of lineage. The Chronicler's meticulous recording of such names, even those seemingly minor, reinforces a commitment to a comprehensive and accurate family record, emphasizing that every link, every individual, was significant in God's eyes for the preservation of His covenant people.
  • sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): Meaning "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etc., (like father or brother), etc.)." The term "sons" here denotes direct male descendants, a crucial element in the patrilineal system of ancient Israelite society. The listing of these sons—Zophah, Imna, Shelesh, and Amal—is not merely an arbitrary collection of names but a precise record of the next generation within Helem's family line. This highlights the paramount importance of male lineage for tribal identity, inheritance rights, and the continuation of the family name, all vital components for maintaining the integrity and structure of the covenant community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of his brother Helem;": This introductory phrase immediately connects Helem to a previously mentioned individual, likely Shamer (or Shemer) in 1 Chronicles 7:34, establishing his precise familial relationship within the larger lineage of Asher. The possessive "his brother" clarifies Helem's position in the family tree, indicating a horizontal relationship to a sibling whose descendants were also being recorded. This meticulous cross-referencing within the genealogy ensures accuracy and proper placement of each family unit, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to a precise and verifiable record of Israel's heritage.
  • "Zophah, and Imna, and Shelesh, and Amal.": This clause provides the direct enumeration of Helem's four sons. The simple listing of names, without further biographical detail, is characteristic of genealogical records throughout the Old Testament. Each name represents an individual life, a distinct family unit, and an integral link in the unbroken chain of the tribe of Asher. While these particular individuals are not prominent figures in broader biblical narrative, their inclusion affirms their historical existence and their collective contribution to the identity of Israel, emphasizing that every member, no matter how seemingly minor in the grand scheme, was part of God's chosen people and His ongoing redemptive plan.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:35, and indeed throughout the opening chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is a highly structured literary form that meticulously lists the lineage of individuals or groups, typically presented in a hierarchical or chronological order. In this verse, the genealogy is presented as a straightforward enumeration, serving a clear documentary and historical purpose. The Chronicler employs this device not merely for factual accuracy but for profound theological ends: to establish the legitimate identity and continuity of post-exilic Israel, to demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His people through generations, and to provide a foundational framework for understanding the unfolding of God's covenant promises. The repetitive nature of such lists emphasizes the unbroken chain of generations and the meticulousness with which God's people were recorded and remembered, affirming their enduring place in His divine plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 7:35 appears to be a dry list of names, it carries profound theological weight, speaking volumes about God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign oversight of human history. The very act of preserving these genealogies, especially after the trauma of exile and dispersion, underscores God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people and His faithfulness in maintaining their identity and lineage. Every name, even those not elaborated upon elsewhere, represents an individual known to God, contributing to the grand tapestry of His redemptive plan. This highlights that God's purposes are intricately woven through the lives of ordinary people, and that even seemingly insignificant details are part of His divine record, demonstrating His comprehensive knowledge and care for every soul.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The inclusion of a verse like 1 Chronicles 7:35 in the inspired Word of God serves as a profound reminder that every detail of our lives, and indeed the lives of all humanity, is known and recorded by our Creator. Just as God meticulously preserved the lineages of Israel, He knows each of us intimately—our past, our present, and our future. This truth should instill in us a sense of profound value and purpose, knowing that we are not random accidents but intentionally created beings within God's grand design. It also encourages us to deeply appreciate the spiritual heritage passed down through generations of believers, recognizing that our faith is built upon the faithfulness of those who came before us. This verse, therefore, calls us to live lives worthy of our calling, recognizing our unique place in God's ongoing story and trusting in His sovereign and detailed care for every aspect of our existence.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of biblical genealogies, like this one, impact your understanding of God's character and His attention to detail in your own life?
  • In what ways does knowing that God records and remembers every individual, even those seemingly obscure, bring you comfort, challenge, or a renewed sense of purpose?
  • How can we, in our modern context, more intentionally honor and preserve our spiritual heritage, connecting with the "cloud of witnesses" who have gone before us in faith?

FAQ

Why are these long lists of names, like 1 Chronicles 7:35, included in the Bible?

Answer: These genealogical lists, though often tedious to read, serve several crucial purposes within the biblical narrative and for the original audience. Historically, they established and maintained tribal identity, validated land rights, and confirmed eligibility for priestly or royal service in ancient Israel. Theologically, they powerfully demonstrate God's meticulous care for His people, His unwavering faithfulness in preserving their lineage despite challenges, and the continuity of His covenant promises across generations. They underscore that every individual, even those not prominent in narrative, is known to God and plays a part in His overarching plan. For the post-exilic community for whom Chronicles was written, these records were vital for re-establishing their national and spiritual identity, confirming their legitimate claim to the land and their place as God's chosen people, as seen throughout the books of Ezra and Nehemiah.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 7:35 is a simple genealogical entry from the Old Testament, its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment lies in the grand narrative of God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, culminating in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The meticulous preservation of Israel's lineages, including seemingly minor ones like Helem's, underscores God's unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, which required a specific lineage through which the Messiah would come. Though this particular line of Asher is not directly messianic, it contributes to the broader tapestry of Israel's history, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in preserving the nation from which the Savior would arise. In the New Testament, we find profound genealogies presented in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 that meticulously trace Jesus' lineage, confirming His identity as the promised Son of David and Son of Abraham. Ultimately, in Christ, our identity is no longer primarily defined by physical lineage but by spiritual adoption into God's family. Through faith in Him, we become "sons of God" and "heirs according to the promise," fulfilling the spiritual intent behind the Old Testament's emphasis on lineage, as beautifully articulated in Galatians 3:26-29. Every name in the Old Testament genealogies ultimately points to the faithfulness of God in bringing forth the one Name above all names, Jesus, through whom all nations are blessed and find their true spiritual heritage.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.