Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The sons of Zophah; Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The sons H1121 of Zophah H6690; Suah H5477, and Harnepher H2774, and Shual H7777, and Beri H1275, and Imrah H3236,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Zofach were: Suach, Harnefer, Shu'al, Beri, Yimrah,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Zophah:
Ask
American Standard Version
The sons of Zophah: Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Zophah: Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Zophah, Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Zophah: Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,572 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 7:36 is a concise verse within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Asher, meticulously listing five of Zophah's sons: Suah, Harnepher, Shual, Beri, and Imrah. While appearing as a simple enumeration of names, this verse, like others in the surrounding chapters, serves a crucial role in the post-exilic Chronicler's historical and theological narrative, affirming the continuity of God's covenant people, preserving tribal identity, and underscoring divine faithfulness in remembering every individual within Israel's lineage.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 1 Chronicles 7, a chapter dedicated to detailing the genealogies of several northern Israelite tribes, including Issachar, Benjamin, Naphtali, Manasseh, Ephraim, and Asher. The broader book of Chronicles, written after the Babylonian exile, served as a theological and historical reminder to the returning exiles of their heritage, their identity as God's chosen people, and the enduring nature of God's covenant with Israel. The Chronicler's emphasis on genealogies, particularly those of the tribes and the royal and priestly lines, was foundational to re-establishing a sense of continuity and legitimacy for the nascent community. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 7:36 falls within the detailed enumeration of the descendants of Asher, highlighting the growth, structure, and distinct family units within this particular tribe, thereby contributing to the comprehensive record of Israel's tribal composition and demonstrating God's faithfulness to His promises across generations.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period following the Babylonian exile (circa 538 BCE onwards) was one of profound re-establishment for the Jewish community. Genealogies were not mere historical curiosities but vital documents that confirmed tribal affiliations, established rights to land inheritance (especially crucial for reclaiming ancestral territories), validated priestly and royal lineages, and ensured the purity of the community. For a people returning from exile, a clear understanding of their lineage was paramount for restoring social order, religious practices, and national identity. The Chronicler's meticulous record-keeping, therefore, addressed the existential questions of who belonged to Israel, who could serve in the temple, and who had a claim to the land, reinforcing the idea that despite the exile, God's covenant people endured and maintained their distinct identity.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous recording of names in 1 Chronicles 7:36, and indeed throughout the genealogies of Chronicles, contributes to several major theological and narrative themes. Firstly, it underscores the Preservation of Lineage, emphasizing the divine importance of maintaining the family lines of Israel, which was crucial for tribal distinctions, land inheritance, and ultimately, the fulfillment of messianic prophecies (see Genesis 49:10). Secondly, it reinforces Tribal Identity and Continuity, as the listing of sons and their descendants reaffirms the distinct identity of the tribe of Asher within the larger nation of Israel, emphasizing the enduring nature of God's people through generations, even after significant historical disruptions like the exile. Thirdly, the very existence of such precise genealogies speaks to God's Meticulous Care and His faithfulness in remembering every individual within His covenant people, reflecting a divine order and purpose in human history. Finally, these genealogies subtly lay the groundwork for Messianic Anticipation, as the preservation of specific tribal lines (like Judah's, highlighted in 1 Chronicles 2) was essential for the eventual appearance of the promised Messiah.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This term (H1121) is fundamental, signifying not just male offspring but also descendants, heirs, and members of a family or clan. In genealogical contexts like 1 Chronicles 7:36, "sons" establishes the direct line of descent and continuity, indicating who inherits the family name, tribal identity, and potentially, land rights. It highlights the patriarchal structure of ancient Israelite society and the method by which lineage was traced and preserved for future generations.
  • Zophah (Hebrew, Tsôwphach, H6690): As a proper noun (H6690), Zophah serves as a specific identifier for the patriarch whose sons are listed. While the etymological meaning of proper names can sometimes offer insights (Strong's notes "from an unused root meaning to expand, breadth"), in this context, "Zophah" primarily functions to anchor this particular family branch within the larger Asherite genealogy. It points to a distinct individual who was a recognized head of a household or clan within the tribe, ensuring that the lineage was precisely recorded and traceable.
  • Beri (Hebrew, Bêrîy, H1275): This proper noun (H1275) identifies one of Zophah's five sons. While its etymology "probably by contraction from בְּאֵרִי" (meaning "of my well") is noted in the Strong's data, in the context of this genealogy, Beri functions primarily as a specific individual name. Its inclusion underscores the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail, ensuring that every significant branch and individual within the tribal lineage of Asher is accounted for, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of God's remembrance of His people.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The sons of Zophah;": This initial phrase immediately establishes the relationship and the lineage being traced. It indicates that the following names are the direct male descendants of a specific individual named Zophah, placing them within a defined family unit and, by extension, within the tribe of Asher. This structure is typical of biblical genealogies, providing a clear hierarchical organization that roots individuals within their tribal and familial contexts, demonstrating a structured and deliberate record-keeping.
  • "Suah, and Harnepher, and Shual, and Beri, and Imrah,": This is a simple, unadorned list of five proper names. Each name represents an individual who was a son of Zophah. The lack of additional descriptive information (e.g., their deeds, their families, their roles) emphasizes that the primary purpose of this verse is to record and preserve the names for genealogical completeness. The conjunctive "and" (וְ, v') links each name, creating a straightforward enumeration that contributes to the comprehensive record of the Asherite families, ensuring the continuity and identity of the tribe through successive generations.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 7:36, and indeed throughout much of Chronicles 7, is Genealogy. This is a specific literary form characterized by the systematic listing of ancestors and descendants. Its purpose here is not merely historical but deeply theological: to establish legitimacy, confirm tribal identity, demonstrate continuity from patriarchal times to the post-exilic era, and underscore God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people. The verse also employs Enumeration or Litany, presenting a simple list of names without elaboration, which serves to emphasize the sheer number and meticulous recording of individuals within the tribal structure. This repetitive listing of names, while seemingly mundane, reinforces the Chronicler's intent to provide a comprehensive and unbroken record, ensuring that no branch of the family tree is overlooked by divine providence and that the historical thread leading to God's ultimate redemptive plan remains unbroken.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 7:36, though a simple list of names, profoundly connects to the overarching biblical narrative of God's covenant faithfulness and His meticulous care for His people. The very act of preserving such detailed genealogies, even for seemingly minor figures, testifies to God's commitment to His promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, ensuring the continuity of the chosen nation through whom His redemptive plan would unfold. These lists affirm the identity of Israel as a distinct people, chosen by God, whose lineage was divinely guarded. They serve as a testament to the fact that God remembers every individual within His covenant, even those whose stories are not extensively recorded, emphasizing that every life has significance in His grand design. Ultimately, these genealogies lay the essential groundwork for the coming of the Messiah, whose lineage would be traced through specific tribal lines.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Chronicles 7:36 might initially appear as a dry, uninteresting list of names, it offers profound spiritual lessons for the contemporary believer. The meticulous detail with which God's Word records these lineages speaks volumes about His character. It reminds us that every individual, regardless of their perceived prominence or historical impact, is known and valued by God. Just as Zophah's sons were not forgotten, neither are we. This verse encourages us to appreciate our spiritual heritage, recognizing that we are part of a continuous line of faith, connected to generations of believers who have gone before us. It reinforces the truth of God's enduring faithfulness across time, providing a solid foundation for our trust in His promises today. Our lives, though seemingly small in the grand tapestry of human history, are intricately woven into God's sovereign plan, and He remembers us by name, calling us to live purposefully within His story.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous recording of names like those in 1 Chronicles 7:36 challenge our modern tendency to focus only on "important" or "famous" individuals?
  • In what ways does understanding our spiritual heritage and the continuity of God's people strengthen our sense of identity and belonging in the body of Christ?
  • What does God's faithfulness in preserving these ancient lineages teach us about His commitment to His promises in our own lives today?
  • How can we live in a way that honors the legacy of faith passed down through generations, both biblically and personally?

FAQ

Why are biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 7:36, so prevalent and seemingly detailed, even for obscure figures?

Answer: Biblical genealogies serve multiple critical purposes beyond mere historical record-keeping. Firstly, they establish legitimacy and identity, confirming tribal affiliations, land rights, and eligibility for priestly or royal service, especially vital for the post-exilic community. Secondly, they demonstrate continuity and covenant faithfulness, showing how God preserved His chosen people through generations, fulfilling His promises made to Abraham (see Genesis 12:1-3). Thirdly, they lay the foundational groundwork for messianic expectation, meticulously tracing the lineage through which the promised Messiah would come (as seen in Matthew 1). Even seemingly obscure names underscore God's meticulous care for every individual within His covenant plan, ensuring that no one is forgotten and every piece of the divine tapestry is accounted for.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The seemingly mundane list of names in 1 Chronicles 7:36, like all Old Testament genealogies, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. These meticulous records, preserving the distinct tribal lines and family units of Israel, were not merely historical curiosities but divinely orchestrated preparations for the Incarnation. They ensured that when the Messiah finally appeared, His lineage could be irrefutably traced back through the promised seed of Abraham (as highlighted in Galatians 3:16) and the royal line of David (foretold in 2 Samuel 7:12-16). The fact that God cared enough to preserve the names of Zophah's sons in the tribe of Asher speaks to His comprehensive attention to every detail of His redemptive plan, a plan that culminated in the birth of Jesus. Both Matthew's and Luke's Gospels provide detailed genealogies of Christ (Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38), demonstrating how all these ancient lines converged in Him, confirming His identity as the promised Son of God and the rightful King, the one in whom all God's promises are "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20). Thus, even a verse listing five obscure names points to the faithfulness of God in preparing the way for our Savior and the ultimate redemption found in Him.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 7 verses 20–40

We have here an account,

I. Of the tribe of Ephraim. Great things we read of that tribe when it came to maturity. Here we have an account of the disasters of its infancy, while it was in Egypt as it should seem; for Ephraim himself was alive when those things were done, which yet is hard to imagine if it were, as is here computed, seven generations off. Therefore I am apt to think that either it was another Ephraim or that those who were slain were the immediate sons of that Ephraim that was the son of Joseph. In this passage, which is related here only, we have, 1. The great breach that was made upon the family of Ephraim. The men of Gath, Philistines, giants, slew many of the sons of that family, because they came down to take away their cattle, Ch1 7:21. It is uncertain who were the aggressors here. Some make the men of Gath the aggressors, men born in the land of Egypt, but now resident in Gath, supposing that they came down into the land of Goshen, to drive away the Ephraimites' cattle, and slew the owners, because they stood up in the defence of them. Many a man's life has been exposed and betrayed by his wealth; so far is it from being a strong city. Others think that the Ephraimites made a descent upon the men of Gath to plunder them, presuming that the time had come when they should be put in possession of Canaan; but they paid dearly for their rashness and precipitation. Those that will not wait God's time cannot expect God's blessing. I rather think that the men of Gath came down upon the Ephraimites, because the Israelites in Egypt were shepherds, not soldiers, abounded in cattle of their own, and therefore were not likely to venture their lives for their neighbours' cattle: and the words may be read, The men of Gath slew them, for they came down to take away their cattle. Zabad the son of Ephraim, and Shuthelah, and Ezer, and Elead (his grandchildren), were, as Dr. Lightfoot thinks, the men that were slain. Jacob had foretold that the seed of Ephraim should become a multitude of nations (Gen 48:19), and yet that plant is thus nipped in the bud. God's providences often seem to contradict his promises; but, when they do so, they really magnify the promise, and make the performance of it, notwithstanding, so much more illustrious. The Ephraimites were the posterity of Joseph, and yet his power could not protect them, though some think he was yet living. The sword devours one as well as another. 2. The great grief which oppressed the father of the family hereupon: Ephraim mourned many days. Nothing brings the aged to the grave with more sorrow than their following the young that descend from them to the grave first, especially if in blood. It is often the burden of those that live to be old that they see those go before them of whom they said, These same shall comfort us. It was a brotherly friendly office which his brethren did, when they came to comfort him under this great affliction, to express their sympathy with him and concern for him, and to suggest that to him which would support and quiet him under this sad providence. Probably they reminded him of the promise of increase which Jacob had blessed him when he laid his right hand upon his head. Although his house was not so with God as he hoped, but a house of mourning, a shattered family, yet that promise was sure, Sa2 23:5. 3. The repair of this breach, in some measure, by addition of another son to his family in his old age (Ch1 7:23), like Seth, another seed instead of that of Abel whom Cain slew, Gen 4:25. When God thus restores comfort to his mourners, makes glad according to the days wherein he afflicted, setting the mercies over against the crosses, we ought therein to take notice of the kindness and tenderness of divine Providence; it is as if it repented God concerning his servants, Psa 90:13, Psa 90:15. Yet joy that a man was born into his family could not make him forget his grief; for he gives a melancholy name to his son, Beriah - in trouble, for he was born when the family was in mourning, when it went evil with his house. It is good to have in remembrance the affliction and the misery, the wormwood and the gall, that our souls may be humbled within us, Lam 3:19, Lam 3:20. What name more proper for man that is born of a woman than Beriah, because born into a troublesome world? It is added, as a further honour to the house of Ephraim, (1.) That a daughter of that tribe, Sherah by name, at the time of Israel's setting in Canaan, built some cities, either at her own charge or by her own care; one of them bore her name, Uzzen-sherah, Ch1 7:24. A virtuous woman may be as great an honour and blessing to a family as a mighty man. (2.) That a son of that tribe was employed in the conquest of Canaan, Joshua the son of Nun, Ch1 7:27. In this also the breach made on Ephraim's family was further repaired; and perhaps the resentment of this injury formerly done by the Canaanites to the Ephraimites might make him more vigorous in the war.

II. Of the tribe of Asher. Some men of note of that tribe are here named. Their militia was not numerous in comparison with some other tribes, only 26,000 men in all; but their princes were choice and mighty men of valour, chief of the princes (Ch1 7:40), and perhaps it was their wisdom that they coveted not to make their trained bands numerous, but rather to have a few, and those apt to the war and serviceable men.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 7:36 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.