Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the children of Israel gave to the Levites these cities with their suburbs.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the children H1121 of Israel H3478 gave H5414 to the Levites H3881 these cities H5892 with their suburbs H4054.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
So the people of Isra'el gave the L'vi'im these cities with the surrounding open land.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So the Israelites gave to the Levites these cities and their pasturelands.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the children of Israel gave to the Levites the cities with their suburbs.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The children of Israel gave to the Levites the cities with their suburbs.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thus the children of Israel gaue to the Leuites cities with their suburbes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the sons of Israel give to the Levites the cities and their suburbs.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,519 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:64 serves as a pivotal concluding statement within a detailed genealogical and administrative section, affirming the faithful execution of God's command by the children of Israel. This verse concisely summarizes the provision of specific cities and their essential surrounding pasturelands to the Levites, underscoring the nation's obedience to divine instruction and the meticulous fulfillment of God's plan for His consecrated tribe, who were set apart for sacred service throughout the land.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 6:64 concludes a lengthy and intricate section (verses 54-81) that meticulously lists the cities allocated to the various Levitical families: the Kohathites, Gershonites, and Merarites. This detailed enumeration follows extensive genealogies of the Levites themselves (1 Chronicles 6:1-53), placing this administrative act within the broader context of Israel's tribal organization and the specific role of the priestly and Levitical lines. The Chronicler's emphasis on these lists highlights the order, faithfulness, and divine provision inherent in Israel's history, moving from the identity of God's people (genealogies) to their structured existence and obedience to the covenant. The verse acts as a summary statement, confirming the completion of the task that the preceding verses have itemized, providing a sense of closure and affirmation to this administrative record.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Unlike the other tribes of Israel, the Levites did not receive a contiguous territorial inheritance because their primary role was to serve in the tabernacle (and later, the temple) and to teach God's law throughout the nation. This unique arrangement was explicitly commanded by God through Moses, as recorded in Numbers 35:2-8, which stipulated forty-eight cities with their "suburbs" (pasturelands) for the Levites. This divine instruction was later fulfilled during the time of Joshua, as detailed in Joshua 21. Thus, 1 Chronicles 6:64 confirms the historical fulfillment of this ancient divine instruction, emphasizing the covenant faithfulness of the Israelites in providing for those dedicated to spiritual service. The "suburbs" (Hebrew: migrashim) were crucial for the Levites' livelihood, as they, like other Israelites, kept livestock; this provision ensured their complete self-sufficiency and ability to focus on their ministry without being burdened by agricultural land management, thereby preserving their distinct sacred calling.
  • Key Themes: This verse, within its broader context, contributes significantly to several key themes. Firstly, it highlights Divine Provision and Faithfulness, demonstrating God's meticulous plan for the Levites, ensuring their sustenance and ability to fulfill their sacred duties even without a traditional land inheritance. It also underscores the faithfulness of the Israelites in obeying God's specific instructions for their care. Secondly, it emphasizes Obedience to God's Command: the act of "giving" these cities demonstrates Israel's adherence to the Mosaic Law concerning the care and provision for the Levites, underscoring that this was not an optional act but a direct command from the Lord, foundational to the covenant relationship. Thirdly, the concept of Scattered Ministry is evident; by receiving cities scattered among all the tribes, the Levites were strategically positioned to minister to the entire nation, serving as spiritual teachers, judges, and guardians of the law, making God's presence and instruction accessible across the land, as seen in Deuteronomy 33:10. Finally, it reinforces The Unique Role of the Levites, who were set apart for sacred service, with their inheritance being the Lord Himself (Numbers 18:20; Deuteronomy 10:9). The cities and suburbs were a practical means to support this unique, non-land-owning, spiritual calling, enabling them to devote themselves fully to their divine commission.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • gave (Hebrew, nâthan', H5414): This primitive root signifies a broad range of actions including to give, put, make, appoint, bestow, or render. In this context, it underscores a deliberate and active transfer. The Israelites, acting as a collective, performed this act of giving, which was simultaneously a fulfillment of a divine command and an expression of their covenantal obligation. This verb highlights the agency of the people in executing God's plan, emphasizing a completed and established reality.
  • cities (Hebrew, ʻîyr', H5892): This term refers to a city or town, often implying a guarded or watched place. In the context of the Levitical provision, "cities" specifically denotes the forty-eight designated urban centers, six of which also functioned as cities of refuge. These were not arbitrary settlements but divinely appointed locations, strategically distributed throughout the tribal territories of Israel. The use of this term emphasizes the structured, intentional, and comprehensive nature of the provision, ensuring the Levites' presence and ministry across the entire nation, thereby facilitating their role as spiritual anchors.
  • suburbs (Hebrew, migrâsh', H4054): This word refers to open country, pastureland, or the area around a building. Crucially, it signifies the common lands immediately surrounding the Levitical cities, extending outwards for a specified distance (typically 1,000 cubits, as per Numbers 35:4). These areas were indispensable for the Levites' livelihood, allowing them to graze their livestock and engage in limited agricultural activities. The inclusion of "suburbs" indicates that the provision was holistic, encompassing not only dwelling places but also the practical means for the Levites to sustain themselves and their families, thereby enabling them to focus entirely on their sacred duties without economic burden.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the children of Israel": This phrase identifies the collective entity responsible for the action. It signifies the entire nation, representing all the other tribes who possessed land inheritance. Their unified action underscores the national obedience and commitment to God's covenantal requirements concerning the Levites. It emphasizes a communal act of faithfulness, demonstrating the solidarity of the tribes in upholding divine mandates.
  • "gave to the Levites": This specifies the beneficiaries of the provision—the tribe of Levi, who had no territorial inheritance of their own, but whose inheritance was the Lord Himself. The act of "giving" highlights the transfer of ownership and the fulfillment of the divine mandate. It signifies the practical expression of the other tribes' responsibility to support those dedicated to spiritual service, ensuring that those set apart for God's work were adequately sustained by the community they served.
  • "[these] cities with their suburbs": This identifies the specific nature and extent of the provision. The demonstrative pronoun "these" implicitly refers to the detailed lists of cities provided in the preceding verses (1 Chronicles 6:54-81), confirming that the enumerated cities were indeed delivered. The inclusion of "with their suburbs" is vital, as it indicates a complete and sufficient provision, encompassing not only dwelling places but also the necessary pastureland for the Levites' livelihood. This comprehensive provision enabled them to sustain themselves and their families while fully devoted to their sacred calling, ensuring their practical needs were met to facilitate their spiritual service.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several key literary devices. Its primary function is Conciseness and Summary, serving as a succinct capstone to the preceding detailed lists of Levitical cities. After an extensive enumeration, this single sentence provides a powerful affirmation of completion and fulfillment, drawing the administrative section to a definitive close. There is also an element of Fulfillment Language, as the verse implicitly states the successful execution of an ancient divine command (originally given in Numbers and fulfilled in Joshua), reinforcing the Chronicler's theme of God's faithfulness and Israel's obedience. The phrase "the children of Israel gave" acts as a statement of Action and Agency, clearly attributing the act of provision to the entire nation, thereby emphasizing their collective obedience and responsibility in upholding the covenant. Furthermore, the repetition of the concept of "giving" and "provision" throughout the broader narrative of the Levitical cities (from Numbers through Joshua and into Chronicles) functions as a form of Thematic Reinforcement, underscoring the enduring importance of supporting those in ministry and the faithfulness of God's people in response to His commands.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 6:64 stands as a testament to God's meticulous care for His consecrated servants and the importance of covenantal obedience within the community of faith. The provision for the Levites, who were set apart for sacred duties without a land inheritance, illustrates a foundational principle: those who dedicate their lives to spiritual ministry are to be supported by the community they serve. This arrangement ensured that the Levites could focus entirely on their priestly, teaching, and judicial roles, thereby maintaining the spiritual health of the nation. It reflects a divine economy where resources are distributed not for personal gain but for the flourishing of God's kingdom and the propagation of His law. The Israelites' act of giving these cities demonstrates their understanding and commitment to this divine mandate, highlighting the reciprocal relationship between those who minister and those who are ministered to. This principle of mutual support and provision for spiritual workers is a timeless truth reiterated throughout Scripture, emphasizing the communal responsibility to enable and empower those called to sacred service.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The historical account of Israel's provision for the Levites in 1 Chronicles 6:64 offers profound contemporary lessons for believers and the church today. It calls us to reflect on the importance of supporting those who dedicate their lives to full-time ministry, teaching, and spiritual leadership. Just as God meticulously planned for the Levites' sustenance so they could focus on their sacred duties, so too are we called to ensure that those who labor in the gospel are adequately provided for, enabling them to serve without undue worldly anxieties. This involves not only financial support but also practical care, prayer, and encouragement. Our willingness to give, whether of our time, talents, or resources, reflects our obedience to God's commands and our commitment to the flourishing of His kingdom. It reminds us that spiritual work requires practical support, and that the health of the community is intrinsically linked to the well-being and effectiveness of its spiritual leaders. This verse challenges us to consider our role in upholding and empowering those who serve, recognizing that their ministry is a gift to the entire body of Christ and a vital component of its spiritual vitality and outreach.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the historical provision for the Levites challenge my understanding of supporting spiritual leaders and ministries today?
  • In what practical ways can I contribute to the well-being and effectiveness of those who serve in full-time ministry in my community or beyond?
  • What does this verse teach me about the importance of obedience and faithfulness in fulfilling God's commands, even when they require personal sacrifice?

FAQ

Why didn't the Levites receive a tribal land inheritance like the other tribes of Israel?

Answer: The Levites did not receive a contiguous tribal land inheritance because their inheritance was the Lord Himself, and their primary role was to serve Him directly in the Tabernacle and later the Temple, and to teach God's law throughout the nation. As stated in Numbers 18:20 and Deuteronomy 10:9, "The Lord is their inheritance." Instead of land, they were given forty-eight cities scattered among all the other tribes, along with their surrounding pasturelands. This strategic distribution allowed them to fulfill their duties as spiritual guides, judges, and guardians of the covenant across the entire land of Israel, making God's presence and instruction accessible to everyone.

What was the specific purpose of the "suburbs" mentioned in conjunction with the Levitical cities?

Answer: The "suburbs" (Hebrew: migrashim) were the common lands or pasturelands surrounding each of the Levitical cities. As detailed in Numbers 35:4-5, these were not merely empty spaces but designated areas, typically extending 1,000 cubits (about 1,500 feet) from the city wall, used for grazing livestock. Since the Levites did not have agricultural land, these suburbs were crucial for their practical livelihood. They allowed the Levites to keep cattle, sheep, and other animals, providing a means of sustenance and ensuring their self-sufficiency. This comprehensive provision—cities for dwelling and suburbs for livelihood—enabled the Levites to dedicate themselves fully to their sacred duties without being burdened by the need to cultivate large tracts of land, thus ensuring their uninterrupted focus on spiritual service.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The provision for the Levites in 1 Chronicles 6:64, while a historical act of obedience, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate provision and scattered ministry found in Christ. The Levites, set apart for sacred service and sustained by the offerings of the people, point to Jesus Christ, who is our true and eternal High Priest (Hebrews 4:14) and the ultimate fulfillment of all priestly functions. Unlike the Levites who received cities, Christ's "inheritance" is the entire world, and His "ministry" is not confined to a physical temple but extends to all who believe, for He is the one who "tabernacled among us" (John 1:14). He is the ultimate Lamb of God, whose sacrifice provides complete spiritual sustenance for our souls (John 6:35) and whose life is our true portion. Furthermore, the Levites' scattered presence throughout Israel, serving as teachers and guides, prefigures the church's mission. Just as the Levites were distributed to bring God's law and presence to the nation, Christ, after His resurrection, commissioned His disciples to "go and make disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28:19), scattering His witnesses throughout the world. The church, as the body of Christ, continues this "scattered ministry," sustained not by physical cities but by the spiritual provisions of God's grace and the mutual support of believers, all empowered by the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8) to proclaim the gospel of the one who is our true inheritance and ultimate High Priest, making Him known to the ends of the earth.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 54–81

We have here an account of the Levites' cities. They are here called their castles (Ch1 6:54), not only because walled and fortified, and well guarded by the country (for it is the interest of every nation to protect its ministers), but because they and their possessions were, in a particular manner, the care of the divine providence: as God was their portion, so God was their protection; and a cottage will be a castle to those that abide under the shadow of the Almighty. This account is much the same with that which we had, Jos. 21. We need not be critical in comparing them (what good will it do us?) nor will it do any hurt to the credit of the holy scripture if the names of some of the places be not spelt just the same here as they were there. We know it is common for cities to have several names. Sarum and Salisbury, Salop and Shrewsbury, are more unlike than Hilen (Ch1 6:58) and Holon (Jos 21:15), Ashan (Ch1 6:59) and Ain (Jos 21:16), Alemeth (Ch1 6:60) and Almon (Jos 21:18); and time changes names. We are only to observe that in this appointment of cities for the Levites God took care, 1. For the accomplishment of dying Jacob's prediction concerning this tribe, that it should be scattered in Israel, Gen 49:7. 2. For the diffusing of the knowledge of himself and his law to all parts of the land of Israel. Every tribe had Levites' cities in it; and so every room was furnished with a candle, so that none could be ignorant of his duty but it was either his own fault or the Levites'. 3. For a comfortable maintenance for those that ministered in holy things. Besides their tithes and offerings, they had glebe-lands and cities of their own to dwell in. Some of the most considerable cities of Israel fell to the Levites' lot. Every tribe had benefit by the Levites, and therefore every tribe must contribute to their support. Let him that is taught in the word communicate to him that teacheth, and do it cheerfully.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 54–81. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:64 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.