Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Unto the sons of Merari were given by lot, throughout their families, out of the tribe of Reuben, and out of the tribe of Gad, and out of the tribe of Zebulun, twelve cities.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Unto the sons H1121 of Merari H4847 were given by lot H1486, throughout their families H4940, out of the tribe H4294 of Reuben H7205, and out of the tribe H4294 of Gad H1410, and out of the tribe H4294 of Zebulun H2074, twelve H8147 H6240 cities H5892.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
To the descendants of M'rari were assigned by lot, clan by clan, twelve cities from the tribes of Re'uven, Gad and Z'vulun.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The Merarites, according to their families, were allotted twelve cities from the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and Zebulun.
Ask
American Standard Version
Unto the sons of Merari were given by lot, according to their families, out of the tribe of Reuben, and out of the tribe of Gad, and out of the tribe of Zebulun, twelve cities.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
To the sons of Merari were given by lot, according to their families, out of the tribe of Reuben, and out of the tribe of Gad, and out of the tribe of Zebulun, twelve cities.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Vnto the sonnes of Merari according to their families out of the tribe of Reuben, and out of the tribe of Gad, and out of the tribe of Zebulun, by lot twelue cities.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
To the sons of Merari, for their families, from the tribe of Reuben, and from the tribe of Gad, and from the tribe of Zebulun, by lot, twelve cities.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:63 meticulously records the specific allocation of twelve cities to the families of Merari, a significant branch of the Levites. This distribution was carried out "by lot," signifying a divinely guided process, and the cities were drawn from the tribal territories of Reuben, Gad, and Zebulun. This administrative detail underscores God's faithful and precise provision for His consecrated servants, who held no territorial inheritance, and highlights the crucial inter-tribal responsibility to support those dedicated to the sacred service of the Tabernacle and, subsequently, the Temple.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within 1 Chronicles chapter 6, a comprehensive genealogical and organizational account focused almost exclusively on the tribe of Levi. The chapter begins by tracing the lineage of the high priests (1 Chronicles 6:1-15), then systematically details the descendants of Levi's three sons—Gershon, Kohath, and Merari—and their designated roles and dwelling places. Verses 54-81 meticulously list the cities assigned to the various Levitical families across the entirety of Israelite territory. Verse 63 specifically concludes the account of the Merarites' allotted cities, following the detailed provisions for the Kohathites and Gershonites. This section powerfully communicates the Chronicler's profound interest in the proper order, functioning, and divine provision for the worship system, emphasizing the divinely ordained roles and provisions for those serving in the sanctuary.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Historically, the tribe of Levi was uniquely set apart by God for exclusive service in the Tabernacle and later the Temple. Unlike the other eleven tribes, they did not receive a contiguous territorial inheritance in the Promised Land. Instead, they were to be supported by the other tribes through tithes and the provision of designated cities and their pasturelands. The distribution of these cities, as described here and more extensively in the book of Joshua, occurred after the conquest of Canaan and the initial settlement of the tribes. The phrase "by lot" (Hebrew: goral) was a common and significant method in ancient Israel for making crucial decisions, distributing land, or discerning divine will, believed to ensure impartiality and God's direct guidance. The tribes of Reuben and Gad were situated east of the Jordan River in Transjordan, while Zebulun was located in the northern part of Canaan, west of the Jordan. This geographical distribution indicates that the Merarite families were scattered widely across Israelite territory, ensuring their presence among the people.
  • Key Themes: 1 Chronicles 6:63 contributes significantly to several foundational themes prevalent throughout the books of Chronicles and the broader Old Testament narrative. It powerfully highlights Divine Provision and Order, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in providing for His chosen servants and His meticulous organization of Israel's tribal and religious life. The distribution "by lot" underscores a process believed to be directly guided by God, ensuring that each Levite family received their designated inheritance and specific place of service, thereby fulfilling God's explicit instructions found in Numbers 35. Furthermore, this verse emphasizes Tribal Responsibility and Interdependence, as specific tribes (Reuben, Gad, Zebulun) were divinely obligated to provide cities for the Levites within their territories. This arrangement fostered a profound sense of communal support for those dedicated to sacred service, demonstrating a unified national effort in upholding the covenant. This allocation also represents the Fulfillment of the Law, specifically the Mosaic commands regarding the provision for the tribe of Levi, who were to live among the other tribes to facilitate their ministry, teaching, and judicial roles. The detailed corroboration of numbers and tribes found in Joshua 21 reinforces the historical accuracy and divine orchestration of the settlement process.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Lot (Hebrew, gôwrâl', H1486): This term refers to a pebble or small stone used for casting lots, a practice in ancient Israel often employed to discern God's will or to ensure an impartial distribution or decision. In this context, its use underscores the belief that the allocation of cities to the Levites was not arbitrary or based on human negotiation, but rather divinely orchestrated. The casting of lots removed human bias and affirmed God's sovereign hand in establishing the order and provision for His people, as articulated in Proverbs 16:33.
  • Merari (Hebrew, Mᵉrârîy', H4847): Merari was the third son of Levi, alongside Gershon and Kohath. The Merarites constituted a significant branch of the Levites, distinguished by their specific duties related to the Tabernacle. Their primary responsibility involved the heavier, structural components of the sanctuary, such as the frames, bars, pillars, and bases, which required substantial strength and organization for transport. Their specific cities were strategically located to support their widespread duties in various regions.
  • Cities (Hebrew, ʻîyr', H5892): Unlike the other tribes who received contiguous land inheritances, the Levites were given 48 cities scattered throughout the territories of the other tribes, as commanded in Numbers 35:7. These cities served as their dwelling places, centers from which they could perform their duties, teach the Law, administer justice, and minister to the people. The provision of these cities ensured that the Levites, though without a land inheritance, were fully supported and integrated into the national life of Israel.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Unto the sons of Merari [were given] by lot": This opening clause precisely identifies the recipients of the cities—the descendants of Merari—and the method of distribution. The phrase "by lot" is crucial, emphasizing that the allocation was not a human decision but a divinely guided process, ensuring fairness, impartiality, and God's sovereign hand in providing for His consecrated servants.
  • "throughout their families": This phrase indicates that the distribution was comprehensive and systematic, ensuring that all the clans and families within the Merarite branch received their designated portion of cities. It speaks to the meticulous organization and thoroughness of the divine plan, leaving no family unprovided for.
  • "out of the tribe of Reuben, and out of the tribe of Gad, and out of the tribe of Zebulun": These three specific tribes are identified as the providers of the cities for the Merarites. Reuben and Gad were Transjordanian tribes, while Zebulun was located in the northern region of Canaan, west of the Jordan. This highlights the inter-tribal responsibility and cooperation required to support the Levites, demonstrating a unified national effort in fulfilling God's commands and sustaining the spiritual life of Israel.
  • "twelve cities": This precise numerical detail confirms the total count of cities allocated specifically to the Merarite families from the aforementioned tribes. This detail aligns perfectly with the more extensive and detailed list found in Joshua 21:34-40, underscoring the fulfillment of God's command for the Levites' provision and the historical accuracy of the Chronicler's account.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs several significant literary devices in 1 Chronicles 6:63 and the surrounding passage. Enumeration is prominently featured, as the text meticulously lists the specific tribes and the precise number of cities. This detailed listing serves to emphasize precision, divine order, and the faithful fulfillment of God's commands given in the Torah. The mention of "by lot" functions as a powerful Theological Marker, signaling divine orchestration and God's sovereignty over the distribution process. This reinforces the profound idea that God is actively involved in the minute details of His people's lives and their inheritance. Furthermore, the passage contributes to a larger Fulfillment Narrative, demonstrating how the commands given in earlier books of the Pentateuch and Joshua were faithfully carried out in the history of Israel. This narrative strategy validates God's word, highlights His covenant faithfulness, and establishes the legitimacy of the Levitical system for the Chronicler's audience.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly administrative detail in 1 Chronicles 6:63 carries profound theological weight, revealing deep truths about God's character and His relationship with His people. It powerfully illustrates God's meticulous care and unwavering faithfulness in providing for those consecrated to His service. The strategic scattering of the Levites among all the tribes, rather than granting them a consolidated territory, ensured their constant presence as spiritual guides, teachers of the Law, and administrators of worship throughout Israel. This arrangement fostered essential interdependence, reminding all tribes of their shared responsibility in supporting the religious life of the nation. The "by lot" distribution further underscores God's sovereign hand in establishing order and equity, ensuring that His divine plan unfolded precisely as intended, free from human manipulation or favoritism. This divine provision for the Levites serves as a powerful testament to God's commitment to sustaining those who dedicate their lives fully to Him and His kingdom purposes.

  • Joshua 21:7 and Joshua 21:34-40 provide the detailed list of the twelve cities given to the Merarites from Reuben, Gad, and Zebulun, confirming the account in 1 Chronicles.
  • Numbers 35:1-8 outlines the original divine command for the Israelites to provide cities for the Levites, along with their pasturelands, establishing the legal and theological basis for this provision.
  • Deuteronomy 18:1-2 clarifies that the Levites would have no territorial inheritance among Israel, but "the Lord is their inheritance," emphasizing their unique reliance on God and the communal support of the other tribes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The meticulous detail of 1 Chronicles 6:63, though seemingly mundane in its administrative nature, offers rich and enduring insights for contemporary reflection and application. It profoundly reminds us that God is a God of order, precision, and abundant provision, even in the smallest and most practical details of His grand redemptive plan. Just as He meticulously provided for the Levites, ensuring their sustenance and strategic placement for effective service, so too does He care for and provide for His people today, especially those called to full-time ministry or specific areas of service within His kingdom. This verse challenges us to thoughtfully consider our own role in supporting those who dedicate their lives to proclaiming the Gospel, teaching God's Word, and serving the church. The principle of communal responsibility for ministry, so vividly evident in the ancient tribes providing for the Levites, remains vitally important in the modern church. It calls believers to active and generous participation in sustaining the work of God's kingdom through their resources, fervent prayers, and practical support, thereby enabling ministers to focus on their sacred calling without undue worldly anxieties. Furthermore, this passage encourages us to cultivate a deeper trust in God's sovereign hand, knowing that He orchestrates our lives, provides for our needs, and guides us to our unique "place" of service and sustenance, whether it is a specific vocational calling or our daily walk of faith.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the concept of cities being distributed "by lot" deepen our understanding of God's sovereignty in our lives and the significant decisions we face, even when outcomes seem random?
  • In what tangible and practical ways can we, as members of a faith community, actively support those dedicated to full-time ministry today, drawing inspiration from the ancient tribes' provision for the Levites?
  • How does recognizing God's meticulous and faithful provision for the Levites encourage our personal trust in His unwavering faithfulness to provide for our own needs and to guide us in our unique callings?

FAQ

Why did the Levites not receive a tribal land inheritance like the other tribes?

Answer: The Levites did not receive a territorial inheritance because they were uniquely set apart for exclusive service to the Lord. Their inheritance was the Lord Himself, and their primary role was to minister in the Tabernacle and later the Temple, teach God's Law, and serve as spiritual guides and judges for the nation. This unique status meant they were to be supported by the other tribes through tithes and the provision of designated cities and their pasturelands, ensuring they could dedicate themselves fully to their sacred duties without the burden of agricultural or territorial management. This is clearly stated in Numbers 18:20 and Deuteronomy 18:1-2.

What was the significance of distributing the cities "by lot"?

Answer: The distribution of cities "by lot" was a common and deeply significant practice in ancient Israel, believed to be a direct means of discerning God's will. It served to remove human bias, prevent disputes, and ensure an impartial and equitable allocation. For the Levites' cities, this method underscored that their placement and provision were divinely ordained, not simply a matter of human negotiation or convenience. This method highlighted God's sovereignty and meticulous care in establishing the order and provision for His people, affirming that "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord" (Proverbs 16:33).

Were the Merarites' duties different from other Levite families?

Answer: Yes, the Merarites had distinct and specialized duties within the Levitical service, differentiating them from the other Levitical families. While the Kohathites were responsible for the most sacred furnishings of the Tabernacle (such as the Ark of the Covenant and the altar) and the Gershonites for the coverings and curtains, the Merarites were specifically tasked with transporting the heavier, structural components of the Tabernacle. This included the frames, bars, pillars, and bases, which required substantial strength and organization for transport. Their assigned cities were strategically located to facilitate these specific and demanding responsibilities, as detailed in Numbers 3:36-37.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous provision for the Merarite Levites in 1 Chronicles 6:63, and indeed for all Levites, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Levites, set apart for divine service and without a worldly inheritance, powerfully foreshadowed Christ, who, though Creator and King of the universe, declared that "the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head" (Matthew 8:20). He is the ultimate High Priest, fulfilling and infinitely surpassing the Levitical priesthood, who perfectly mediates between God and humanity through His once-for-all sacrifice (Hebrews 7:27). The Levites' "inheritance" being the Lord Himself points directly to the New Covenant reality where believers, through their union with Christ, inherit eternal life and every spiritual blessing, with God Himself as their ultimate and eternal portion (Ephesians 1:3). Furthermore, the communal support for the Levites prefigures the Church's calling to support those in ministry today, empowered by Christ's Great Commission to "go and make disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28:19-20). In Christ, we find not just a physical dwelling or a scattered city of refuge, but a spiritual home and eternal rest, as He promises, "In my Father's house are many rooms... I am going there to prepare a place for you" (John 14:2-3). He is the ultimate provision, the true "place" where God's people dwell, serve, and find their complete identity and purpose, fulfilling the scattered cities of refuge and service in His own perfect person.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 54–81

We have here an account of the Levites' cities. They are here called their castles (Ch1 6:54), not only because walled and fortified, and well guarded by the country (for it is the interest of every nation to protect its ministers), but because they and their possessions were, in a particular manner, the care of the divine providence: as God was their portion, so God was their protection; and a cottage will be a castle to those that abide under the shadow of the Almighty. This account is much the same with that which we had, Jos. 21. We need not be critical in comparing them (what good will it do us?) nor will it do any hurt to the credit of the holy scripture if the names of some of the places be not spelt just the same here as they were there. We know it is common for cities to have several names. Sarum and Salisbury, Salop and Shrewsbury, are more unlike than Hilen (Ch1 6:58) and Holon (Jos 21:15), Ashan (Ch1 6:59) and Ain (Jos 21:16), Alemeth (Ch1 6:60) and Almon (Jos 21:18); and time changes names. We are only to observe that in this appointment of cities for the Levites God took care, 1. For the accomplishment of dying Jacob's prediction concerning this tribe, that it should be scattered in Israel, Gen 49:7. 2. For the diffusing of the knowledge of himself and his law to all parts of the land of Israel. Every tribe had Levites' cities in it; and so every room was furnished with a candle, so that none could be ignorant of his duty but it was either his own fault or the Levites'. 3. For a comfortable maintenance for those that ministered in holy things. Besides their tithes and offerings, they had glebe-lands and cities of their own to dwell in. Some of the most considerable cities of Israel fell to the Levites' lot. Every tribe had benefit by the Levites, and therefore every tribe must contribute to their support. Let him that is taught in the word communicate to him that teacheth, and do it cheerfully.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 54–81. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:63 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.