Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And unto the sons of Kohath, which were left of the family of that tribe, were cities given out of the half tribe, namely, out of the half tribe of Manasseh, by lot, ten cities.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And unto the sons H1121 of Kohath H6955, which were left H3498 of the family H4940 of that tribe H4294, were cities given out of the half H2677 tribe H4294, namely, out of the half H4276 tribe of Manasseh H4519, by lot H1486, ten H6235 cities H5892.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The rest of the descendants of K'hat were assigned by lot, clan by clan, ten cities from the half-tribe of M'nasheh.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
To the rest of the Kohathites, ten cities were allotted from the half-tribe of Manasseh.
Ask
American Standard Version
And unto the rest of the sons of Kohath were given by lot, out of the family of the tribe, out of the half-tribe, the half of Manasseh, ten cities.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
To the rest of the sons of Kohath were given by lot, out of the family of the tribe, out of the half-tribe, the half of Manasseh, ten cities.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And vnto the sonnes of Kohath the remnant of the familie of the tribe, euen of the halfe tribe of the halfe of Manasseh, by lot ten cities.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And to the sons of Kohath, those left of the family of the tribe, from the half of the tribe, the half of Manasseh, by lot, are ten cities.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 6:61 meticulously records the divine allocation of ten cities from the half-tribe of Manasseh to the remaining families of the Kohathite Levites. This verse stands as a profound testament to God's precise provision and ordered fulfillment of His covenant promises, ensuring that those consecrated for His service were strategically positioned throughout Israel to perform their sacred duties, teach His law, and maintain the spiritual integrity of the nation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles, particularly chapters 1-9, is fundamentally a genealogical record, designed to establish the lineage, tribal divisions, and especially the priestly and Levitical structures of Israel. For the post-exilic community, this meticulous documentation served to affirm their identity, continuity with their past, and the legitimacy of their worship practices, reminding them of God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant. Chapter 6 specifically delves into the descendants of Levi—Gershon, Kohath, and Merari—detailing their assigned roles in Temple service, including priestly, musical, and Tabernacle duties. Verses 54-81 then provide an exhaustive list of the specific cities allocated to each Levitical family across the various tribes of Israel. Therefore, 1 Chronicles 6:61 is an integral part of this detailed account, highlighting the specific portion of cities granted to the Kohathites from the half-tribe of Manasseh, thereby underscoring the Chronicler's concern for precise historical and theological accuracy in the re-establishment of Israel's spiritual life.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Unlike the other tribes of Israel, the Levites did not receive a consolidated territorial inheritance in the Promised Land. This unique arrangement stemmed from their distinct calling: their "inheritance" was the Lord Himself, and their primary role was to serve the Tabernacle (and later the Temple), ministering to God and providing spiritual instruction to the entire nation. To facilitate this pervasive ministry, they were assigned specific cities scattered among the other tribes, along with surrounding pasturelands for their livestock, as explicitly commanded in Numbers 35. The "sons of Kohath" were a preeminent Levitical family, entrusted with the most sacred articles of the Tabernacle, including the Ark of the Covenant, during Israel's wilderness wanderings (Numbers 3:31). The distribution of these cities "by lot" (Hebrew: gôwrāl) was a common and profoundly significant practice in ancient Israel for major decisions, signifying that the allocation was not arbitrary or based on human negotiation, but rather determined by divine providence and guidance, thereby ensuring fairness, divine approval, and the removal of human bias.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous allocation of cities to the Levites, as detailed throughout 1 Chronicles 6, contributes to several overarching themes within the Chronicler's work and the broader biblical narrative. First, it powerfully illustrates Divine Provision and Order, demonstrating God's meticulous planning and faithful sustenance for those dedicated to His service, ensuring His ministers were sustained and strategically positioned to serve all the tribes. Second, it highlights the Fulfillment of God's Covenant, as this distribution directly fulfills the instructions given to Moses regarding the Levitical cities, as recorded in Numbers 35:1-8 and subsequently implemented in Joshua 21. This underscores Israel's obedience (or the Chronicler's emphasis on it) to the Mosaic covenant. Third, the scattering of the Levites among all the tribes ensured their Ubiquitous Levitical Service and Presence were accessible to all Israelites, fostering a unified spiritual life across the nation through spiritual instruction, judicial guidance, and sacrificial service. Finally, the Levites' unique inheritance—cities instead of consolidated land—underscores their distinct calling to Inheritance of Ministry, emphasizing dedicated service over material or territorial pursuits, with their true wealth found in their consecrated service to God and His people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Kohath (Hebrew, Qᵉhâth', H6955): One of the three sons of Levi, from whom a major branch of the Levites descended. The Kohathites were specifically charged with the sacred duty of carrying the most holy furnishings of the Tabernacle, including the Ark of the Covenant, the table of showbread, the lampstand, and the altars, during Israel's wilderness journeys. Their role was central to the ceremonial life of Israel, and their allocation of cities was crucial for their continued service.
  • left (Hebrew, yâthar', H3498): This word signifies "to remain or be left." In the context of "which were left of the family of that tribe," it clarifies that these were the remaining Kohathite families who had not yet received their allocation, distinguishing them from the priestly line of Aaron (who were also Kohathites) who had already received their cities, as detailed in earlier verses (1 Chronicles 6:54-60). It emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the distribution to all branches of the Levitical families, ensuring none were overlooked.
  • lot (Hebrew, gôwrâl', H1486): This term refers to a pebble or small stone used in ancient Israel for casting lots, a solemn method believed to reveal God's will and divine appointment. It removed human bias and ensured that the allocation was seen as divinely ordained, reinforcing the belief that God was sovereignly guiding the affairs of His people, particularly in matters of land distribution and sacred assignments. The use of "by lot" underscores the divine sanction and fairness of the process.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And unto the sons of Kohath, [which were] left of the family of that tribe,": This opening clause precisely identifies the recipients of the cities: the Kohathite Levites. The parenthetical phrase "[which were] left of the family of that tribe" is crucial, indicating that these were the specific Kohathite families who had not yet received their land inheritance, distinct from the priestly descendants of Aaron (who were also Kohathites but had their cities detailed previously). This highlights the meticulous and comprehensive nature of the distribution, ensuring every designated Levitical family received its due.
  • "[were cities given] out of the half tribe, [namely, out of] the half [tribe] of Manasseh,": This segment specifies the precise geographical and tribal source of the allocated cities. The repeated emphasis on "half tribe" and the explicit naming of "Manasseh" underscores the exactness of the Chronicler's record. The tribe of Manasseh was unique in its division, with one half settling east of the Jordan and the other west. This detail is vital for tracing the geographical spread of the Levites and confirming the fulfillment of the divine command to provide cities from each of Israel's tribes, demonstrating the meticulous adherence to God's instructions.
  • "by lot, ten cities.": This concluding phrase details both the method and the quantity of the cities provided. "By lot" signifies the divine oversight and fairness of the distribution process, ensuring that the allocation was not arbitrary or subject to human negotiation, but rather divinely appointed and sanctioned. The specific number, "ten cities," provides a concrete measure of the provision, highlighting the exactness of God's plan and the comprehensive nature of the Levitical settlement, affirming God's faithfulness in providing for His consecrated servants.

Literary Devices

The Chronicler employs several literary devices in 1 Chronicles 6:61 to convey its message effectively. The most prominent is Precision and Detail, evident in the exact naming of the recipients ("sons of Kohath"), the specific source ("half tribe of Manasseh"), the method ("by lot"), and the precise quantity ("ten cities"). This meticulousness serves to affirm the historical accuracy and divine order of the events, reinforcing the legitimacy and divine sanction of the Levitical system for the post-exilic community. The implicit Repetition of the phrase "half tribe" (though partially supplied by the KJV's bracketed additions, it reflects a clear emphasis in the Hebrew) underscores the specific and perhaps geographically distinct source of these cities, highlighting the thoroughness of the distribution. Furthermore, the mention of "by lot" implicitly invokes the theme of Divine Sovereignty, as this method was understood to be God's way of revealing His will, thus attributing the orderly allocation of cities directly to His providential hand and removing any human arbitrary decision-making.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The precise allocation of cities to the Kohathite Levites in 1 Chronicles 6:61 resonates with profound theological and thematic truths. It underscores God's meticulous care for His covenant people and, specifically, for those dedicated to His service. This divine provision ensures that the Levites, whose inheritance was the Lord Himself, were sustained and strategically positioned to fulfill their vital spiritual and judicial roles throughout the land. The distribution by lot highlights God's sovereign involvement in the minute details of His people's lives, demonstrating His commitment to order, justice, and the faithful fulfillment of His promises. It is a powerful testament to the principle that those who prioritize God's kingdom and service will be cared for by His gracious hand, enabling them to effectively carry out their calling for the spiritual well-being of the entire community.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The ancient record of cities allocated to the Kohathite Levites in 1 Chronicles 6:61 offers timeless principles for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God is a God of order and purpose, who meticulously provides for those dedicated to His service. Just as the Kohathites were given specific places and resources to fulfill their ministry, believers today are called to various roles within the body of Christ, and God, in His grace, provides for them. This verse emphasizes that every part of God's people has a vital function and a divinely appointed place within His grand plan. It calls us to recognize and affirm the unique callings of others, understanding that our collective strength lies in the diverse contributions of each member. Furthermore, it highlights the enduring importance of supporting those who serve in full-time ministry, ensuring they have the necessary resources to fulfill their calling effectively, thereby enabling the spiritual nourishment and growth of the entire community and the flourishing of God's kingdom.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's meticulous provision for the Levites encourage you in your own calling or service within the body of Christ today?
  • In what ways can we, as the modern "priesthood of believers," ensure that spiritual instruction and service are accessible to all within our communities?
  • How does understanding God's sovereign hand in ancient distributions (like "by lot") impact your trust in His guidance and provision in your personal life and ministry?

FAQ

Why did the Levites not receive a territorial inheritance like the other tribes?

Answer: The Levites did not receive a consolidated territorial inheritance because their primary role was to serve the Lord and the people of Israel as priests, teachers of the law, and ministers of the Tabernacle/Temple. Their "inheritance" was the Lord Himself (Deuteronomy 10:9). By being scattered in cities among all the tribes, they could fulfill their duties of spiritual instruction, judicial guidance, and sacrificial service, making spiritual resources accessible throughout the nation. This unique arrangement ensured their dedication to spiritual matters rather than agricultural or territorial pursuits, emphasizing their spiritual calling above material gain.

What is the significance of "by lot" in this context?

Answer: The phrase "by lot" (Hebrew: gôwrāl) is highly significant. In ancient Israel, casting lots was a sacred practice believed to reveal God's direct will and divine appointment. It was not a random game of chance but a solemn means of discerning divine guidance, especially in matters of great importance like land distribution (Joshua 14:2). In the context of 1 Chronicles 6:61, it signifies that the allocation of cities to the Kohathites was not arbitrary or based on human negotiation, but divinely ordained, ensuring fairness and God's approval over the settlement of His consecrated servants. As Proverbs 16:33 states, "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord."

How does this verse relate to the broader purpose of 1 Chronicles?

Answer: This verse, detailing the precise allocation of cities to the Kohathite Levites, serves multiple purposes within the broader narrative of 1 Chronicles. First, for the post-exilic community for whom the book was written, it reinforced the legitimacy and divine sanction of the Levitical priesthood, which was crucial for re-establishing proper worship and national identity after their return from exile. Second, it demonstrated God's faithfulness to His covenant promises, showing how the instructions given to Moses regarding the Levitical cities (Numbers 35) were meticulously fulfilled. Third, it underscored the Chronicler's emphasis on order, structure, and the proper functioning of God's people, highlighting that every aspect of Israel's life, especially its spiritual leadership, was carefully planned and provided for by God.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 6:61 details the physical provision for the Old Testament Levites, it powerfully foreshadows the ultimate provision and calling found in Christ. The Levites, particularly the Kohathites, were set apart for sacred service, responsible for the holy things of God, and scattered among the tribes to bring God's presence and instruction to His people. This finds its profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ, who is our Great High Priest, the ultimate one consecrated for service, who did not inherit a physical territory but whose "inheritance" was to do the Father's will and accomplish His redemptive plan (John 4:34). Just as the Levites were provided for by God to serve, Christ, though He had "nowhere to lay his head" (Matthew 8:20), was perfectly sustained by the Father to fulfill His ministry of reconciliation. Moreover, in the New Covenant, all believers are called a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9), scattered throughout the world not in specific cities, but as witnesses to the Gospel (Acts 1:8). God continues to meticulously provide for and sustain those He calls into ministry, whether vocational or as part of the general priesthood of believers, ensuring His presence and truth are accessible to all nations through the ultimate service accomplished by His Son.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 6 verses 54–81

We have here an account of the Levites' cities. They are here called their castles (Ch1 6:54), not only because walled and fortified, and well guarded by the country (for it is the interest of every nation to protect its ministers), but because they and their possessions were, in a particular manner, the care of the divine providence: as God was their portion, so God was their protection; and a cottage will be a castle to those that abide under the shadow of the Almighty. This account is much the same with that which we had, Jos. 21. We need not be critical in comparing them (what good will it do us?) nor will it do any hurt to the credit of the holy scripture if the names of some of the places be not spelt just the same here as they were there. We know it is common for cities to have several names. Sarum and Salisbury, Salop and Shrewsbury, are more unlike than Hilen (Ch1 6:58) and Holon (Jos 21:15), Ashan (Ch1 6:59) and Ain (Jos 21:16), Alemeth (Ch1 6:60) and Almon (Jos 21:18); and time changes names. We are only to observe that in this appointment of cities for the Levites God took care, 1. For the accomplishment of dying Jacob's prediction concerning this tribe, that it should be scattered in Israel, Gen 49:7. 2. For the diffusing of the knowledge of himself and his law to all parts of the land of Israel. Every tribe had Levites' cities in it; and so every room was furnished with a candle, so that none could be ignorant of his duty but it was either his own fault or the Levites'. 3. For a comfortable maintenance for those that ministered in holy things. Besides their tithes and offerings, they had glebe-lands and cities of their own to dwell in. Some of the most considerable cities of Israel fell to the Levites' lot. Every tribe had benefit by the Levites, and therefore every tribe must contribute to their support. Let him that is taught in the word communicate to him that teacheth, and do it cheerfully.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 54–81. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 6:61 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.