Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Shechaniah; Shemaiah: and the sons of Shemaiah; Hattush, and Igeal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Shechaniah H7935; Shemaiah H8098: and the sons H1121 of Shemaiah H8098; Hattush H2407, and Igeal H3008, and Bariah H1282, and Neariah H5294, and Shaphat H8202, six H8337.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Sh'khanyah: Sh'ma'yah and the sons of Sh'ma'yah - Hatush, Yig'al, Bariach, Ne'aryah and Shafat - six.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The six descendants of Shecaniah were Shemaiah and his sons: Hattush, Igal, Bariah, Neariah, and Shaphat.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Shecaniah: Shemaiah. And the sons of Shemaiah: Hattush, and Igal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Shecaniah: Shemaiah. The sons of Shemaiah: Hattush, and Igal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonne of Shechaniah was Shemaiah: and the sonnes of Shemaiah were Hattush and Igeal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, sixe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Shechaniah: Shemaiah; and sons of Shemaiah: Hattush, and Igeal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six.
Ask
See also
In the KJVVerse 10,384 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 3:22 meticulously continues the genealogical record of King David's royal lineage, specifically detailing the descendants through Shechaniah. This verse precisely lists Shechaniah's son, Shemaiah, and then enumerates five of Shemaiah's sons by name—Hattush, Igeal, Bariah, Neariah, and Shaphat—concluding with the explicit count "six" to underscore the accuracy and completeness of this vital family record. It serves as a testament to the unbroken continuity of the Davidic line, a crucial element for the post-exilic community in establishing identity and anticipating the fulfillment of divine promises.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within 1 Chronicles chapter 3, which is entirely devoted to the comprehensive genealogy of King David's royal descendants. Following extensive tribal genealogies in previous chapters, Chapter 3 narrows its focus to the house of David, tracing his sons and their subsequent generations. This particular verse, 1 Chronicles 3:22, is part of a longer section (1 Chronicles 3:17-24) that details the post-exilic descendants of King Jeconiah (also known as Jehoiachin), a crucial link in the Davidic line after the Babylonian exile. The meticulous naming and numbering within this chapter, including the "six" in verse 22, underscore the Chronicler's intent to provide a precise and unbroken record of the royal lineage, demonstrating God's faithfulness to His covenant promises even through periods of national upheaval.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period, around 450-400 BC, for the community that had returned to Judah from Babylonian captivity. For this restored community, genealogies were not mere lists; they were foundational documents. They served multiple critical functions: establishing tribal identities and land rights, validating priestly legitimacy for service in the rebuilt temple, and, most significantly for the Davidic line, confirming the unbroken continuity of the royal covenant. The precise naming of individuals, even those not prominent in historical narratives, provided a tangible link to their heritage and a basis for hope in the future fulfillment of God's promises, particularly the promise of an eternal Davidic throne found in 2 Samuel 7:16. The meticulous nature of records like 1 Chronicles 3:22 would have been vital for a community seeking to re-establish its identity and legitimacy in the land.
  • Key Themes: The detailed enumeration in 1 Chronicles 3:22 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates the Continuity of God's Promises. Even amidst the devastation of exile and the challenges of return, these meticulous lists assure the reader that God remained faithful to His covenant with David, painstakingly preserving his royal line through numerous generations. Secondly, the inclusion of specific names, even those seemingly obscure, highlights Divine Providence in Detail. It underscores God's meticulous oversight of history and His personal attention to each individual within His grand redemptive plan. Every person, regardless of their historical prominence, had their place in God's unfolding story, pointing towards the ultimate heir of the Davidic throne. Finally, the precise naming and counting ("six") emphasize Historical Accuracy and Legitimacy. This level of detail reinforces the reliability of the biblical record and its importance for establishing legitimate claims to heritage and position within the restored community, echoing the careful genealogical records found elsewhere, such as in Ezra 2.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Shechaniah (Hebrew, Shᵉkanyâh', H7935): From Strong's H7935, meaning "Jah has dwelt." In the context of a genealogy, this name subtly points to God's enduring presence and faithfulness within the lineage of David. The very name suggests divine involvement in the continuation of this crucial family line, even through generations that might seem obscure or challenging.
  • Shemaiah (Hebrew, Shᵉmaʻyâh', H8098): From Strong's H8098, meaning "Jah has heard." This name also carries a theological resonance, implying God's attentiveness to His people and His covenant. It suggests that the continuation of this line is not accidental but a result of divine hearing and response to His own promises, reinforcing the theme of God's active involvement in human history.
  • six (Hebrew, shêsh', H8337): From Strong's H8337, a primitive number. The explicit numerical count "six" at the end of the verse is not merely a tally but an emphatic statement of completeness and precision. In ancient genealogies, such exact enumeration served to confirm the thoroughness and accuracy of the record, reinforcing its authority and trustworthiness for establishing lineage and inheritance. It speaks to the Chronicler's meticulous approach and the divine ordering of history.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Shechaniah; Shemaiah:" This clause establishes the immediate link in the genealogical chain, identifying Shemaiah as the direct descendant of Shechaniah. It provides the foundational connection from which the subsequent generation branches out, maintaining the flow of the Davidic lineage and underscoring the precise tracing of the family line.
  • "and the sons of Shemaiah; Hattush, and Igeal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat," This is the core of the verse, listing five specific names of Shemaiah's sons. The enumeration of these individuals, though they are not prominent figures in other biblical narratives, highlights the meticulous nature of the record and the importance of each link in the chain for demonstrating continuity and the divine preservation of the Davidic line.
  • "six." The concluding word, "six," serves as a precise numerical confirmation of the number of Shemaiah's sons listed. This emphatic count reinforces the accuracy and completeness of the genealogical entry, ensuring that the record is perceived as reliable and authoritative for the community relying on these lineages for identity and hope in the fulfillment of God's covenant promises.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 3:22, and indeed throughout much of the early chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form designed to establish lineage, legitimacy, and historical continuity. In Chronicles, the genealogies serve to root the post-exilic community in their past, reminding them of God's covenant faithfulness, particularly to the house of David. The device of Enumeration is also prominent, with the explicit mention of "six" sons. This precise counting emphasizes the meticulousness of the record-keeping and reinforces the authenticity and reliability of the lineage. Furthermore, the Repetition of the phrase "and the sons of..." creates a rhythmic pattern that underscores the unbroken succession of generations, reinforcing the theme of divine preservation of the Davidic line.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 3:22, despite its seemingly dry enumeration of names, is deeply significant for its theological and thematic connections. It serves as a tangible demonstration of God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, especially the Davidic covenant which guaranteed an eternal dynasty. The meticulous preservation of this lineage, even through periods of national decline and exile, underscores God's sovereignty over history and His commitment to His word. It reminds the reader that God works through seemingly ordinary individuals and obscure details to accomplish His grand redemptive plan. The very existence of such precise records would have been a source of immense hope and assurance for the returning exiles, confirming their identity as God's people and their place within His ongoing story of salvation.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

For the modern reader, a verse like 1 Chronicles 3:22, filled with unfamiliar names and numerical counts, might initially seem distant or irrelevant. However, it offers profound spiritual insights and practical applications. It serves as a powerful reminder of God's meticulous care and faithfulness, not just to a nation or a royal line, but to every detail of His grand plan. Just as God painstakingly preserved the lineage of David through seemingly obscure individuals like Hattush, Igeal, Bariah, Neariah, and Shaphat, He remains faithful to His promises across generations and through all circumstances, even when our own lives feel insignificant or unrecorded. This verse invites us to consider that every life, though seemingly small or unheralded in the grand scheme of history, plays a vital part in God's overarching narrative. Our existence, our struggles, our triumphs, and our very names are known to God and fit into His divine purposes. It encourages us to trust in God's sovereign hand, knowing that He is working out His plans with precision and unwavering commitment, even in the "boring" details of life.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of biblical genealogies, like this one, challenge our perception of what is "important" or "significant" to God?
  • In what ways do these ancient records affirm God's faithfulness to His promises across generations, even when circumstances seem bleak or the future uncertain?
  • How can understanding our place within God's larger story, even if our "name" isn't prominently listed in scripture, encourage us in our daily walk and sense of purpose?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so important in the Bible, especially in books like Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in the Bible are far more than mere lists of names; they serve crucial theological, historical, and legal functions. For the post-exilic community to whom Chronicles was addressed, these records were vital for re-establishing identity, land rights, and tribal affiliations after the disruption of exile. They confirmed who belonged to which family or tribe, which was essential for inheritance and social order. Most significantly, genealogies, particularly the Davidic line, demonstrated God's faithfulness to His covenant promises. They provided an unbroken link to the past, assuring the people that God had preserved the lineage through whom the Messiah would come. This was especially important for the Davidic dynasty, as seen in the detailed records of Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7, which helped confirm the legitimacy of those returning to rebuild Judah.

Do the names listed in 1 Chronicles 3:22 have any special significance?

Answer: While individual Hebrew names often carry meanings (e.g., Shemaiah means "Yah has heard"), the primary significance of the names in 1 Chronicles 3:22 is not their individual etymological meaning for a general audience, but their collective role in demonstrating the continuity and accuracy of the Davidic lineage. The importance here lies in the fact that these names are recorded and counted ("six"), rather than a deep theological insight derived from each specific name. Their inclusion underscores the meticulous nature of the Chronicler's record-keeping, validating the unbroken chain of descent from David, which was crucial for the theological and historical claims of the post-exilic community.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

1 Chronicles 3:22, like all the genealogies in the Old Testament, finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. While seemingly a dry list of names, this verse is a vital thread in the intricate tapestry of God's redemptive history, meticulously preserving the lineage through which the promised Messiah would eventually come. The Davidic covenant, explicitly promising an eternal throne and kingdom to David's descendant (2 Samuel 7:12-16), is precisely what these genealogies meticulously track. Every name, including Hattush, Igeal, Bariah, Neariah, and Shaphat, represents a link in the chain that ultimately leads to Jesus. The New Testament genealogies in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 confirm Jesus's direct descent from David, fulfilling the ancient prophecies. He is the "son of David" (Romans 1:3) and the "Root and the Offspring of David" (Revelation 22:16), the true and eternal King whose kingdom will have no end. Thus, 1 Chronicles 3:22, in its detailed preservation of the Davidic line, points forward to the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, the ultimate heir and fulfillment of all God's promises.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 3 verses 10–24

David having nineteen sons, we may suppose them to have raised many noble families in Israel whom we never hear of in the history. But the scripture gives us an account only of the descendants of Solomon here, and of Nathan, Lu. 3. The rest had the honour to be the sons of David; but these only had the honour to be related to the Messiah. The sons of Nathan were his fathers as man, the sons of Solomon his predecessors as king. We have here, 1. The great and celebrated names by which the line of David is drawn down to the captivity, the kings of Judah in a lineal succession, the history of whom we have had at large in the two books of Kings and shall meet with again in the second book of Chronicles. Seldom has a crown gone in a direct line from father to son for seventeen descents together, as here. This was the recompence of David's piety. About the time of the captivity the lineal descent was interrupted, and the crown went from one brother to another and from a nephew to an uncle, which was a presage of the eclipsing of the glory of that house. 2. The less famous, and most of them very obscure, names, in which the house of David subsisted after the captivity. The only famous man of that house that we meet with at their return from captivity was Zerubbabel, elsewhere called the son of Salathiel, but appearing here to be his grandson (Ch1 3:17-19), which is usual in scripture. Belshazzar is called Nebuchadnezzar's son, but was his grandson. Salathiel is said to be the son of Jeconiah because adopted by him, and because, as some think, he succeeded him in the dignity to which he was restored by Evil-merodach. Otherwise Jeconiah was written childless: he was the signet God plucked from his right hand (Jer 22:24), and in his room Zerubbabel was placed, and therefore God saith to him (Hag 2:23), I will make thee as a signet. The posterity of Zerubbabel here bear not the same names that they do in the genealogies (Mt. 1, or Lu. 3), but those no doubt were taken from the then herald's office, the public registers which the priests kept of all the families of Judah, especially that of David. The last person named in this chapter is Anani, of whom bishop Patrick says that the Targum adds these words, He is the king Messiah, who is to be revealed, and some of the Jewish writers give this reason, because it is said (Dan 7:13), the son of man came gnim gnanani - with the clouds of heaven. The reason indeed is very foreign and far-fetched; but that learned man thinks it may be made use of as an evidence that their minds were always full of the thoughts of the Messiah and that they expected it would not be very long after the days of Zerubbabel before the set time of his approach would come.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–24. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
Six: Counting the father in the number.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 3:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.