Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Over the camels also was Obil the Ishmaelite: and over the asses was Jehdeiah the Meronothite:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Over the camels H1581 also was Obil H179 the Ishmaelite H3459: and over the asses H860 was Jehdeiah H3165 the Meronothite H4824:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Ovil the Yishma'eli was put over the camels, Yechd'yahu the Meronoti over the donkeys
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Obil the Ishmaelite was in charge of the camels. Jehdeiah the Meronothite was in charge of the donkeys.
Ask
American Standard Version
and over the camels was Obil the Ishmaelite: and over the asses was Jehdeiah the Meronothite: and over the flocks was Jaziz the Hagrite.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and over the camels was Obil the Ishmaelite: and over the donkeys was Jehdeiah the Meronothite: and over the flocks was Jaziz the Hagrite.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And ouer the camels was Obil the Ishmaelite: and ouer the asses was Iehdeiah the Meronothite:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and over the camels is Obil the Ishmeelite; and over the asses is Jehdeiah the Meronothite;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 11,140 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 27:30 meticulously records two specialized administrative roles within King David's highly organized kingdom: Obil the Ishmaelite, appointed over the royal camels, and Jehdeiah the Meronothite, responsible for the royal asses. This specific detail, part of a comprehensive register of David's officials, highlights his commitment to thorough stewardship of resources, efficient governance, and the strategic utilization of diverse expertise, even in seemingly minor aspects of the kingdom's management.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 1 Chronicles chapter 27, a detailed and exhaustive register outlining King David's sophisticated administrative and military infrastructure. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic audience, meticulously emphasizes David's exemplary leadership, his foresight, and his meticulous planning in establishing the kingdom's operational framework. Chapters 23-27 collectively present David's extensive preparations for the temple, the organization of the Levitical service, and the establishment of a robust civil administration. The inclusion of specific officials for the various royal assets, alongside military commanders, tribal leaders, and other high-ranking administrators, underscores the comprehensive nature of David's governance. This level of detail serves a crucial purpose: to portray David as a model king whose administrative genius laid the groundwork for Israel's stability, prosperity, and the eventual construction of the temple, thereby legitimizing the Davidic line and encouraging faithfulness among the returning exiles.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, camels and asses (donkeys) were indispensable assets, representing significant economic, military, and logistical value. Camels, often referred to as "ships of the desert," were crucial for long-distance trade, the transportation of heavy goods, and military campaigns across arid regions due to their remarkable endurance and ability to traverse difficult terrain with minimal water. Owning large herds of camels signified immense wealth and strategic power for a monarch. Asses, on the other hand, were vital for local transportation, agricultural labor (such as plowing and grinding grain), and personal travel, especially in the hilly and mountainous terrain characteristic of Israel. Their widespread use made them the backbone of daily life and the agricultural economy. The appointment of "Obil the Ishmaelite" is particularly noteworthy. Ishmaelites, descendants of Abraham through Ishmael, were renowned throughout the ancient world for their expertise in desert travel, trade, and, crucially, camel husbandry, as evidenced by their presence as traders in the narrative of Joseph's sale. David's willingness to employ a non-Israelite, and specifically one from a traditionally nomadic people, for such a specialized and critical role demonstrates his pragmatic leadership and his focus on competence and merit over ethnic origin, reflecting a broader biblical principle of God using diverse individuals for His sovereign purposes.
  • Key Themes: Several profound themes emerge from this verse and its broader context. Firstly, the theme of Order and Administration is paramount; David's meticulous organization, as detailed throughout 1 Chronicles 27, showcases a profound commitment to effective governance and faithful stewardship. This systematic approach ensured the stability and prosperity of the kingdom, mirroring the divine attribute that "God is not a God of disorder but of peace" (1 Corinthians 14:33). Secondly, the theme of Valuing Expertise is powerfully evident in the appointment of Obil. David recognized and utilized specialized skills regardless of background or national origin, demonstrating a wise and inclusive approach to leadership that prioritizes competence for the benefit of the entire kingdom. This resonates with the biblical emphasis on the diversity of gifts and talents working together harmoniously within a community, as described in Romans 12:4-8. Thirdly, Stewardship of Resources is clearly highlighted. The careful management of royal assets like livestock underscores the profound importance of responsible oversight of all that God entrusts to human leaders, whether material possessions, human capital, or time. This principle is consistently taught throughout Scripture, perhaps most famously in the Parable of the Talents.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • camels (Hebrew, gâmâl', H1581): Apparently from a root meaning "to labor" or "to bear a burden," this word refers to a camel. In the ancient world, camels were invaluable beasts of burden, capable of carrying heavy loads over long distances and enduring harsh desert conditions. Their presence in a royal inventory signifies significant wealth and logistical capacity, making their oversight a critical administrative task.
  • Obil (Hebrew, ʼôwbîyl', H179): Probably derived from a root meaning "mournful," this name refers to Obil, an Ishmaelite. While the etymology suggests "mournful," in the context of his role, it is often interpreted by scholars as a descriptive name meaning "camel driver" or "one who leads camels," reflecting his expertise. His ethnic designation as an Ishmaelite is key, as Ishmaelites were renowned for their skill in camel husbandry and desert travel.
  • Ishmaelite (Hebrew, Yishmâʻêʼlîy', H3459): This term is a patronymic, referring to a descendant of Ishmael, Abraham's son through Hagar. Historically, Ishmaelites were nomadic peoples known for their extensive knowledge of desert trade routes and, crucially, their unparalleled expertise in handling camels. David's appointment of an Ishmaelite demonstrates a pragmatic and merit-based approach to leadership, valuing specialized skill over national or ethnic origin for critical roles within his kingdom.
  • asses (Hebrew, ʼâthôwn', H860): Probably from a root conveying the sense of "patience," this word specifically refers to a female donkey. Donkeys were ubiquitous in ancient Israel, serving as primary animals for local transportation, agricultural labor (plowing, grinding grain), and personal travel. Their docility made them ideal for daily use, and their management was essential for the kingdom's agricultural productivity and internal logistics.
  • Jehdeiah (Hebrew, Yechdîyâhûw', H3165): This is a theophoric name, common in ancient Israel, meaning "unity of Jah" or "Yahweh makes glad." Such names reflect the piety of the parents or a hope placed in God regarding the child's life. While the name itself doesn't directly relate to his administrative role, it is a testament to the pervasive religious worldview of the time, where even administrative officials bore names that glorified God, aligning with the Chronicler's emphasis on God's hand in David's reign.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Over the camels also [was] Obil the Ishmaelite": This initial clause identifies the specific royal asset—the camels—and the individual appointed to oversee them. The inclusion of "also" (Hebrew, גַּם gam) seamlessly connects this administrative detail to the broader, meticulous list of officials in the chapter, underscoring that no aspect of the kingdom's resources was overlooked by David's administration. Obil's ethnic designation as an "Ishmaelite" is highly significant, highlighting David's strategic and pragmatic decision to leverage specialized knowledge and expertise, even from outside the traditional Israelite community, for the efficient and skilled management of a vital royal resource. Camels were not only costly but also absolutely essential for the kingdom's long-distance trade, military logistics, and overall economic health.
  • "and over the asses [was] Jehdeiah the Meronothite": This second clause specifies the other critical animal asset—the asses (donkeys)—and the official responsible for their care and management. Jehdeiah's title, "the Meronothite," indicates his geographical origin, likely from Meronoth, a place within Judah. This detail grounds the official within the Israelite tribal and geographical structure, providing a contrast to Obil's foreign origin. While perhaps less glamorous than the management of camels, the oversight of asses was equally crucial for daily transport, agricultural productivity, and the general functioning of the kingdom's internal economy. This dual appointment further emphasizes the comprehensive and thorough nature of David's administrative oversight, ensuring that all valuable assets, large and small, were properly managed.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 27:30, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles 27, is List/Register. The Chronicler meticulously records names, roles, and origins, creating a detailed administrative roster. This device serves to emphasize David's extraordinary organizational skills and the comprehensive nature of his kingdom's infrastructure. The sheer volume of specific details, even down to the overseers of livestock, conveys a profound sense of Thoroughness and Order, demonstrating David's commitment to good governance and faithful stewardship. Furthermore, the inclusion of "Obil the Ishmaelite" can be seen as a subtle form of Inclusivity or Pragmatism, as a foreign national from a traditionally distinct lineage is entrusted with a significant royal asset, highlighting David's wise leadership that transcends conventional boundaries for the sake of efficiency and expertise. The specific naming of individuals for seemingly mundane roles also employs Synecdoche, where these two individuals represent the broader principle of specialized oversight and diligent management for all kingdom resources.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 27:30, while appearing to be a mere administrative detail, offers profound theological insights into the nature of leadership, the importance of faithful stewardship, and God's providential order. David's meticulous organization reflects a divine principle that God is a God of order and purpose, not chaos. His commitment to managing every aspect of his kingdom, from military divisions to the care of livestock, underscores the biblical call to faithful stewardship over all resources entrusted to humanity. This includes not only material wealth but also time, talents, and relationships. The appointment of Obil the Ishmaelite further highlights God's sovereignty in using diverse individuals, even those from outside the covenant community, to fulfill His purposes. It speaks to a universal principle of valuing competence and recognizing gifts wherever they are found, demonstrating that God's work is not limited by human distinctions or prejudices. Ultimately, David's administrative wisdom, guided by God, serves as a model for how human leaders can wisely manage earthly affairs in a way that honors God and promotes the well-being of His people, recognizing that all good governance flows from divine wisdom.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This seemingly ordinary verse from Chronicles offers powerful and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a profound reminder that faithfulness in the "small things" is just as significant to God as faithfulness in the grand endeavors of life. David's meticulous attention to the management of his kingdom's resources, extending even to the diligent care of camels and asses, teaches us the invaluable principles of diligence, order, and responsible stewardship in every facet of our lives. Whether it involves managing our personal finances, wisely allocating our time, cultivating our talents, nurturing our families, or diligently fulfilling our professional responsibilities, God calls us to be faithful stewards of all that He has graciously entrusted to us. Furthermore, David's willingness to appoint Obil, an Ishmaelite, to a position of significant trust and responsibility, speaks volumes about valuing expertise and recognizing gifts irrespective of background, ethnicity, or social standing. In a world often fractured by divisions of race, nationality, or social status, this serves as a powerful and timely reminder for us to embrace diversity, actively seek out competence, and collaborate with all people for the common good and the advancement of God's kingdom, recognizing that God uses a multitude of individuals with varied gifts for His divine purposes. Our calling as believers is to be faithful, organized, and discerning in all our endeavors, thereby reflecting the inherent order, wisdom, and inclusive nature of our Creator.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of your life (e.g., finances, time, relationships, spiritual gifts) are you called to exercise greater diligence and stewardship, paying attention even to the "small" details?
  • How can you better recognize and intentionally utilize the diverse gifts, talents, and expertise of those around you, regardless of their background, for the benefit of your community, church, or workplace?
  • What practical steps can you take to implement principles of order and planning, as exemplified by David's administration, into your personal or spiritual life?
  • How does the principle of valuing competence over origin, as demonstrated by David's appointment of Obil, challenge any unconscious biases or preconceived notions you might hold about others?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such seemingly mundane details about David's administration?

Answer: The inclusion of such detailed administrative lists, like 1 Chronicles 27:30, serves several important purposes for the Chronicler's original audience and for us today. Firstly, for the post-exilic community, it powerfully demonstrated David's exemplary leadership and the comprehensive, divinely-blessed order he established in the kingdom. This provided a tangible model for good governance and faithful stewardship, reassuring a people rebuilding their nation that God values order, meticulous planning, and diligent administration. Secondly, it underscores the Chronicler's overarching theological agenda: to show that David, as God's chosen king, laid the foundational administrative and spiritual groundwork for the temple and the future of Israel. Every detail, no matter how seemingly small, contributed to the stability, prosperity, and spiritual health of the kingdom, which was ultimately for God's glory. It also reveals the practical realities of managing a large, complex nation, highlighting the importance of every role, from military general to livestock manager. This meticulous record emphasizes that God is concerned with every aspect of our lives and calls us to faithfulness in all our responsibilities, whether grand or seemingly insignificant, much like the detailed instructions for the tabernacle in Exodus 25.

What was the significance of camels and asses in ancient Israel?

Answer: Camels and asses (donkeys) were incredibly significant in ancient Israel, serving as vital economic and logistical assets that underpinned daily life and the kingdom's prosperity. Camels were the "ships of the desert," indispensable for long-distance trade, military logistics, and travel across arid regions due to their remarkable ability to carry heavy loads and survive without water for extended periods. They represented considerable wealth, strategic capability, and were essential for international commerce. Asses, on the other hand, were crucial for more localized transport, agricultural work (such as plowing, threshing grain, and drawing water), and personal travel, especially within the hilly and mountainous terrain of Israel. They were more common and accessible than camels, forming the backbone of the agricultural economy and daily life for most people. The careful management of these animals, as seen in 1 Chronicles 27:30, was therefore essential for the kingdom's overall functioning, trade networks, and agricultural productivity, much like a modern nation's infrastructure and transportation networks are vital today. Their importance is frequently highlighted throughout the Old Testament, such as in Genesis 24:10 for camels and Numbers 22:23 for asses.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 27:30 details the administrative oversight of David's earthly kingdom, it subtly points to the ultimate and perfect administration of God's eternal kingdom under Christ. David's meticulous organization and comprehensive stewardship foreshadow the divine order and sovereign purpose found in Christ, who is the Head of all things, "upholding the universe by the word of his power" (Hebrews 1:3). Just as David appointed skilled individuals to manage his kingdom's resources, Christ, as the ultimate Steward and King, perfectly administers His church, His spiritual body, bestowing diverse gifts upon believers "for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ" (Ephesians 4:12). The inclusion of Obil the Ishmaelite, a foreigner, in a position of trust and responsibility within David's administration, powerfully prefigures Christ's inclusive kingdom where "there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). In Christ, all barriers are broken down, and competence in service to God's purposes is valued above all human distinctions. Every detail of David's rule, even the diligent management of livestock, was part of a larger divine plan that ultimately culminates in Christ, who perfectly fulfills all righteousness, brings all creation under His sovereign, perfectly administered reign, and ensures that "in him all things hold together" (Colossians 1:17).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 27 verses 16–34

We have here an account,

I. Of the princes of the tribes. Something of the ancient order instituted by Moses in the wilderness was still kept up, that every tribe should have its prince or chief. It is probable that it was kept up all along, either by election or by succession, in the same family; and those are here named who were found in that office when this account was taken. Elihu, or Eliab, who was prince of Judah, was the eldest son of Jesse, and descended in a right line from Nahshon and Salmon, the princes of this tribe in Moses's time. Whether these princes were of the nature of lord-lieutenants that guided them in their military affairs, or chief-justices that presided in their courts of judgment, does not appear. Their power, we may suppose, was much less now that all the tribes were united under one king than it had been when, for the most part, they acted separately. Our religion obliges us to be subject, not only to the king as supreme, but unto governors under him (Pe1 2:13, Pe1 2:14), the princes that decree justice. Of Benjamin was Jaaziel the son of Abner, Ch1 27:21. Though Abner was David's enemy, and opposed his coming to the throne, yet David would not oppose the preferment of his son, but perhaps nominated him to this post of honour, which teaches us to render good for evil.

II. Of the numbering of the people, Ch1 27:23, Ch1 27:24. It is here said, 1. That when David ordered the people to be numbered he forbade the numbering of those under twenty years old, thinking thereby to save the reflection which what he did might otherwise cast upon the promise that they should be innumerable; yet it was but a poor salvo, for it had never been customary to number those under twenty, and the promise of their numbers chiefly respected the effective men. 2. That the account which David took of the people, in the pride of his heart, turned to no good account; for it was never perfected, nor done with exactness, nor was it ever recorded as an authentic account. Joab was disgusted with it, and did it by halves; David was ashamed of it, and willing it should be forgotten, because there fell wrath for it against Israel. A good man cannot, in the reflection, please himself with that which he knows God is displeased with, cannot make use of that, nor take comfort in that, which is obtained by sin.

III. Of the officers of the court. 1. The rulers of the king's substance (as they are called, Ch1 27:31), such as had the oversight and charge of the king's tillage, his vineyards, his olive-yards, his herds, his camels, his asses, his flocks. Here are no officers for state, none for sport, no master of the wardrobe, no master of the ceremonies, no master of the horse, no master of the hounds, but all for service, agreeable to the simplicity and plainness of those times. David was a great soldier, a great scholar, and a great prince, and yet a great husband of his estate, kept a great deal of ground in his own hand, and stocked it, not for pleasure, but for profit; for the king himself is served of the field, Ecc 5:9. Those magistrates that would have their subjects industrious must themselves be examples of industry and application to business. We find, however, that afterwards the poor of the land were thought good enough to be vine-dressers and husbandmen, Kg2 25:12. Now David put his great men to preside in these employments. 2. The attendants on the king's person. They were such as were eminent for wisdom, being designed for conversation. His uncle, who was a wise man and a scribe, not only well skilled in politics, but well read in the scriptures, was his counsellor, Ch1 27:32. Another, who no doubt excelled in learning and prudence, was tutor to his children. Ahithophel, a very cunning man, was his counsellor: but Hushai, an honest man, was his companion and confidant. It does not appear that he had many counsellors; but those he had were men of great abilities. Much of the wisdom of princes is seen in the choice of their ministry. But David, though he had all these trusty and well-beloved cousins and counsellors about him, preferred his Bible before them all. Psa 119:24, Thy testimonies are my delight and my counsellors.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 27:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.