Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when Shaul was dead, Baalhanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when Shaul H7586 was dead H4191, Baalhanan H1177 the son H1121 of Achbor H5907 reigned H4427 in his stead.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
After Sha'ul died, Ba'al-Hanan the son of 'Akhbor took his place as king.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When Shaul died, Baal-hanan son of Achbor reigned in his place.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Shaul died, and Baal-hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Shaul died, and Baal Hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his place.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when Shaul was dead, Baal-hanan the sonne of Achbor reigned in his stead.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Shaul dieth, and reign in his stead doth Baal-Hanan son of Achbor;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,302 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 1:49 is a concise genealogical entry within the extensive opening chapters of the book, meticulously recording the succession of kings in Edom. Specifically, it notes the death of King Shaul and the commencement of Baalhanan's reign, serving as a vital link in the chronological and dynastic record of a nation closely related to Israel, yet distinct. This verse, though brief, contributes to the Chronicler's broader purpose of establishing a comprehensive historical framework, underscoring God's sovereign oversight even of nations outside the direct covenant line, and laying foundational lineage for the post-exilic community.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the monumental genealogical record that comprises the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles, tracing humanity's lineage from Adam through the patriarchs, tribes of Israel, and eventually to the Davidic monarchy. More immediately, 1 Chronicles 1:43-54 presents a detailed list of the kings who reigned in Edom before any king reigned over the Israelites. This specific sequence, mirroring the account in Genesis 36:31-43, meticulously charts the succession of Edomite rulers. Verse 49, noting the transition from Shaul to Baalhanan, is a single, precise entry in this longer, unbroken chain, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to comprehensive historical documentation, even for nations outside of Israel's direct covenant. Its placement underscores the Chronicler's intent to provide a foundational, universal history before narrowing the focus to Israel's specific story.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period (late 5th or early 4th century BCE), addressing a community striving to re-establish its identity and heritage after the Babylonian exile. Genealogies were paramount in ancient Near Eastern societies, serving as legal documents for land claims, tribal identity, priestly qualifications, and royal legitimacy. Edom, descended from Esau (Jacob's brother), held a complex and often adversarial relationship with Israel throughout its history (e.g., Numbers 20:14-21 and Obadiah 1:10-14). The inclusion of Edomite kings, therefore, is not merely an academic exercise but acknowledges the historical reality of a significant neighboring power. Shaul, Baalhanan, and Achbor are identified as Edomite figures, distinct from Israelite individuals with similar names (e.g., King Saul of Israel), further emphasizing the Chronicler's precision in distinguishing lineages.
  • Key Themes: 1 Chronicles 1:49, as part of the Edomite king list, contributes to several overarching themes. Firstly, it highlights Succession and Continuity, illustrating the orderly transfer of power in ancient monarchies, a theme that will become central to the Chronicler's focus on the Davidic line. Secondly, it underscores the Meticulous Nature of Biblical Record-Keeping, demonstrating the commitment to historical accuracy and detail, even for nations not directly part of the covenant people. Thirdly, the very inclusion of these foreign genealogies implicitly speaks to Divine Sovereignty Over All Nations. While Israel is God's chosen people, the Chronicler subtly reminds his audience that God's plan encompasses all of humanity, and He oversees the rise and fall of all earthly kingdoms, as seen in passages like Daniel 2:21. Finally, these genealogies serve the broader purpose of establishing Identity and Heritage for the returning exiles, grounding their present in a deep and extensive past, which includes understanding their relationship to surrounding peoples.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Shaul (Hebrew, Shâʼûwl', H7586): This name, meaning "asked," refers to the Edomite king whose death is recorded in this verse. He is distinct from the Israelite King Saul. The mention of his death is a simple, factual statement indicating the end of a dynastic period, paving the way for the next ruler.
  • dead (Hebrew, mûwth', H4191): A primitive root meaning "to die (literally or figuratively); causatively, to kill." In this context, it signifies the literal end of Shaul's life and reign. The direct statement "was dead" emphasizes the finality of his rule, a common transition marker in ancient Near Eastern royal annals.
  • reigned (Hebrew, mâlak', H4427): A primitive root meaning "to reign; inceptively, to ascend the throne; causatively, to induct into royalty." This word indicates the official and legitimate assumption of kingship by Baalhanan. It denotes the transfer of royal authority and the continuation of the Edomite monarchy.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when Shaul was dead,": This opening clause marks a pivotal moment in the Edomite king list. It signifies the end of one reign, that of King Shaul, and sets the stage for a new one. The simple declarative statement emphasizes the finality of death, a universal human experience, even for kings. In the broader context of genealogies, it functions as a transition marker, moving from one generation or ruler to the next in the sequence of Edomite monarchs.
  • "Baalhanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.": This clause directly states the succession. Baalhanan, identified by his patronymic "the son of Achbor," assumes the kingship. The phrase "reigned in his stead" (וַיִּמְלֹךְ תַּחְתָּיו, vayyimlokh taḥtāw) is a standard biblical idiom for royal succession, indicating a direct and legitimate transfer of power. This detail is crucial for the Chronicler's purpose of providing a precise and unbroken historical record of the Edomite royal line.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 1:49, and indeed throughout the lengthy genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles, is Annalistic Record-Keeping. The verse functions as a concise, factual entry in a royal chronicle, akin to a ledger or register. Its stark, formulaic structure ("when X was dead, Y reigned in his stead") is characteristic of ancient Near Eastern royal inscriptions and historical documents, emphasizing clarity and precision over elaborate narrative. There is also an element of Repetition as this formula is repeated for each king in the Edomite list, creating a rhythmic and predictable pattern that reinforces the continuous nature of the royal line. This deliberate simplicity highlights the Chronicler's historical intent, providing a foundational and authoritative record for the returning exiles.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Although seemingly a dry historical fact, 1 Chronicles 1:49 subtly reinforces profound theological truths. It demonstrates God's meticulous attention to detail, even in the histories of nations seemingly peripheral to Israel's covenant. The orderly succession of kings, even in Edom, speaks to a divine order and sovereignty that undergirds all human affairs. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic community grappling with their identity and future, implicitly reminds them that God is sovereign over the rise and fall of all kingdoms, not just Israel's. This comprehensive historical sweep prepares the reader for the detailed account of God's covenant with David and the establishment of the Davidic line, showing that God's plan unfolds within the broader tapestry of world history.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 1:49, while a simple historical entry, offers valuable insights for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God is a God of order and detail, concerned not just with grand narratives but with the specific, seemingly mundane facts of history. The succession of kings, even in a nation like Edom, demonstrates that human power structures are transient and subject to divine oversight. This perspective encourages us to trust in God's overarching plan, knowing that He is at work in all times and places, orchestrating events beyond our comprehension. For us, it serves as a call to recognize that every aspect of our lives, every transition, every detail, is known to God and can be part of His larger purpose. We are invited to find peace in His sovereignty, even when faced with changes or uncertainties in our own lives or in the world around us.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Chronicler's meticulous record-keeping, even for foreign nations, shape your understanding of God's character and His involvement in world history?
  • In what ways does the concept of "succession" and "continuity" in this verse relate to the ongoing work of God's kingdom through generations?
  • How can we apply the truth of God's sovereignty over all earthly rulers and transitions to our own anxieties or hopes regarding leadership and governance today?

FAQ

Why are these Edomite king lists included in a book primarily about Israel's history?

Answer: The inclusion of Edomite king lists, such as the one in which 1 Chronicles 1:49 is found, serves several crucial purposes for the Chronicler and his original audience. Firstly, it establishes a comprehensive historical framework, demonstrating that Israel's story is not isolated but unfolds within the broader context of world history. Edom, being descended from Esau, Jacob's brother, represents a significant, albeit often adversarial, relative nation, and their history is intertwined with Israel's. Secondly, it subtly reinforces the theme of God's universal sovereignty, showing that God oversees the rise and fall of all nations, not just His chosen people. This would have been particularly comforting for a post-exilic community trying to understand God's plan in a world dominated by foreign empires. Finally, these genealogies, including foreign ones, contribute to the Chronicler's overall goal of providing a complete and authoritative historical record for the returning exiles, helping them re-establish their identity and heritage. A parallel list can be found in Genesis 36:31-43, highlighting the ancient and consistent nature of these records.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 1:49 records a mundane succession in Edomite kingship, its deeper significance lies in its contribution to the grand narrative of God's sovereign control over all history, which ultimately culminates in Christ. The meticulous recording of lineages, both Israelite and foreign, underscores the divine hand that orchestrates all human events, preparing the way for the promised Messiah. Every king who reigned, every nation that rose and fell, was part of the providential tapestry woven by God, leading inexorably to the arrival of His eternal King. The transient reigns of earthly monarchs like Shaul and Baalhanan stand in stark contrast to the everlasting reign of Jesus Christ, the true King of Kings and Lord of Lords, who inherited a throne not by human succession but by divine right and eternal covenant (Luke 1:32-33). The genealogies, though seemingly dry, ultimately point to the one perfect lineage that brought forth the Savior of the world, whose kingdom will have no end (Revelation 11:15). Thus, even a verse about an Edomite king's succession quietly testifies to the sovereign plan that culminates in the reign of the Messiah.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 28–54

All nations but the seed of Abraham are already shaken off from this genealogy: they have no part nor lot in this matter. The Lord's portion is his people. Of them he keeps an account, knows them by name; but those who are strangers to him he beholds afar off. Not that we are to conclude that therefore no particular persons of any other nation but the seed of Abraham found favour with God. It was a truth, before Peter perceived it, that in every nation he that feared God and wrought righteousness was accepted of him. Multitudes will be brought to heaven out of all nations (Rev 7:9), and we are willing to hope there were many, very many, good people in the world, that lay out of the pale of God's covenant of peculiarity with Abraham, whose names were in the book of life, though not descended from any of the following families written in this book. The Lord knows those that are his. But Israel was a chosen nation, elect in type; and no other nation, in its national capacity, was so dignified and privileged as the Jewish nation was. That is the holy nation which is the subject of the sacred story; and therefore we are next to shake off all the seed of Abraham but the posterity of Jacob only, which were all incorporated into one nation and joined to the Lord, while the other descendants from Abraham, for aught that appears, were estranged both from God and from one another.

I. We shall have little to say of the Ishmaelites. They were the sons of the bondwoman, that were to be cast out and not to be heirs with the child of the promise; and their case was to represent that of the unbelieving Jews, who were rejected (Gal 4:22, etc.), and therefore there is little notice taken of that nation. Ishmael's twelve sons are just named here (Ch1 1:29-31), to show the performance of the promise God made to Abraham, in answer to his prayer for him, that, for Abraham's sake, he should become a great nation, and particularly that he should beget twelve princes, Gen 17:20.

II. We shall have little to say of the Midianites, who descended from Abraham's children by Keturah. They were children of the east (probably Job was one of them), and were separated from Isaac, the heir of the promise (Gen 25:6), and therefore they are only named here, Ch1 1:32. The sons of Jokshan, the son of Keturah, are named also, and the sons of Midian (Ch1 1:32, Ch1 1:33), who became most eminent, and perhaps gave denomination to all these families, as Judah to the Jews.

III. We shall not have much to say of the Edomites. They had an inveterate enmity to God's Israel; yet because they descended from Esau, the son of Isaac, we have here an account of their families, and the names of some of their famous men, Ch1 1:35 to the end. Some slight differences there are between some of the names here, and as we had them in Gen. 36, whence this whole account is taken. Three of four names that were written with a Vau there are written with a Jod here, probably the pronunciation being altered, as is usual in other languages. we now write many words very differently from what they were written but 200 years ago. Let us take occasion, from the reading of these genealogies, to think, 1. Of the multitudes that have gone through this world, have acted their part in it, and then quitted it. Job, even in his early day, saw not only every man drawing after him, but innumerable before him, Job 21:33. All these, and all theirs, had their day; many of them made a mighty noise and figure in the world; but their day came to fall, and their place knew them no more. The paths of death are trodden paths, but vestigia nulla retrorsum - none can retrace their steps. 2. Of the providence of God, which keeps up the generations of men, and so preserves that degenerate race, though guilty and obnoxious, in being upon earth. How easily could he cut it off without either a deluge or a conflagration! Write but all the children of men childless, as some are, and in a few years the earth will be eased of the burden under which it groans; but the divine patience lets the trees that cumber the ground not only grow, but propagate. As one generation, even of sinful men, passes away, another comes (Ecc 1:4; Num 32:14), and will do so while the earth remains. Destroy it not, for a blessing is in it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 28–54. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:49 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.