Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother's name was Joktan.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And unto Eber H5677 were born H3205 two H8147 sons H1121: the name H8034 of the one H259 was Peleg H6389; because in his days H3117 the earth H776 was divided H6385: and his brother's H251 name H8034 was Joktan H3355.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and to 'Ever were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg [division], because it was during his lifetime that the earth was divided; and his brother's name was Yoktan.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Two sons were born to Eber: One was named Peleg, because in his days the earth was divided, and his brother was named Joktan.
Ask
American Standard Version
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; for in his days the earth was divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; for in his days the earth was divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Vnto Eber also were borne two sonnes: the name of the one was Peleg: for in his dayes was ye earth deuided: and his brothers name was Ioktan.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And to Eber have been born two sons, the name of the one is Peleg, for in his days hath the land been divided, and the name of his brother is Joktan.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,272 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 1:19 is a concise yet profoundly significant genealogical entry within the opening chapters of Chronicles, detailing the birth of two sons to Eber: Peleg and Joktan. The verse's primary focus is Peleg, whose name is explicitly linked to a pivotal historical event: "because in his days the earth was divided." This statement serves as an etiological explanation, pointing to the dispersion of humanity and the diversification of languages, most notably associated with the events at the Tower of Babel, thereby marking a critical turning point in early human history and the formation of distinct nations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within the extensive and foundational genealogies of 1 Chronicles 1-9, which meticulously trace humanity's lineage from Adam through the patriarchs, culminating in the tribes of Israel. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 1:19 appears in the section detailing the descendants of Noah's son Shem, following the account of the Flood. The Chronicler's purpose in presenting these detailed lists is not merely historical record-keeping but to establish the continuity of God's covenant people, reminding the post-exilic community of their identity and heritage rooted in divine promises. The mention of Peleg and the division of the earth serves as a crucial bridge, connecting the universal history of humanity to the more specific history of Israel.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israelite genealogies were far more than simple family trees; they were vital documents that affirmed identity, established claims to land and inheritance, and validated priestly or royal lineage. For the original audience, likely returning from Babylonian exile, these lists provided a reassuring link to their past, reinforcing their place within God's grand narrative. The figure of Eber is particularly significant as he is traditionally considered the eponymous ancestor of the "Hebrews" (עִבְרִי, ‘ivrî), making his descendants, including Peleg and Joktan, direct progenitors of the peoples from whom Israel emerged. The reference to the "earth being divided" speaks to a widely understood ancient event, the dispersion of peoples and the confusion of languages, which profoundly shaped the geopolitical landscape of the ancient Near East, leading to the formation of distinct nations and cultural groups.
  • Key Themes: The verse encapsulates several key themes prevalent in the early chapters of Genesis and echoed by the Chronicler. Firstly, it highlights the significance of names, where a name like Peleg (meaning "division") directly commemorates a major historical event, underscoring the biblical practice of names carrying prophetic or commemorative weight. Secondly, it points to the division of humanity, a consequence of human pride and rebellion, as vividly described in the narrative of the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11. This division, while a judgment, also served God's purpose of populating the earth and preventing a unified, potentially tyrannical, global power from opposing Him. Thirdly, it subtly reinforces God's sovereignty in history, demonstrating that even amidst human sin and scattering, God's overarching plan for humanity's spread and the eventual formation of nations is unfolding according to His design, as hinted at in Deuteronomy 32:8.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Peleg (Hebrew, Peleg', H6389): The name פֶלֶג (Peleg), as indicated by H6389, is directly linked to the concept of "division." While the Strong's definition for the proper name itself notes "earthquake," the verse's explicit etiological explanation ("because in his days the earth was divided") ties it directly to the root verb פָּלַג (pālag, H6385), meaning "to split" or "to divide." Thus, Peleg's name serves as a perpetual memorial to a pivotal moment of global separation.
  • Eber (Hebrew, ‘Êbêr', H5677): The name עֵבֶר (‘Êbêr), from H5677, signifies "the region beyond" or "across." Eber holds immense genealogical significance as the eponymous ancestor of the "Hebrews" (עִבְרִי, ‘ivrî), establishing a crucial link in the lineage that leads directly to Abraham and, subsequently, to the nation of Israel. His presence underscores the specific heritage and identity of God's covenant people.
  • divided (Hebrew, pâlag', H6385): This word, derived from the primitive root פָּלַג (pâlag, H6385), means "to split (literally or figuratively)" or "to divide." In 1 Chronicles 1:19, the Hebrew verb form (נִפְלְגָה, niphləḡâ) is in the Niph'al stem, indicating a passive action—the earth was divided, implying an external, often divine, agent causing the separation. This linguistic connection between Peleg's name and the verb for "divided" powerfully reinforces the etiological explanation provided in the verse.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And unto Eber were born two sons:" This opening clause establishes the continuation of the patriarchal line through Eber, emphasizing his role as a key genealogical figure. It sets the stage for introducing his significant offspring, maintaining the chronological and familial flow of the genealogies that are central to the Chronicler's purpose.
  • "the name of the one [was] Peleg;" This introduces the first of Eber's two sons, Peleg. The specificity of naming one son first suggests his particular importance, which is immediately clarified by the subsequent explanatory clause. His name alone signals a profound historical event.
  • "because in his days the earth was divided:" This is the explanatory core of the verse, providing the etiological reason for Peleg's name. The phrase "the earth was divided" is widely understood to refer to the dispersion of humanity and the confusion of languages at the Tower of Babel, as detailed in Genesis 11:1-9. This event marked a profound shift from a unified human population to distinct nations and linguistic groups, shaping the course of human history.
  • "and his brother's name [was] Joktan." This clause introduces Peleg's brother, Joktan, completing the record of Eber's two sons. While Joktan's name does not carry the same etiological weight in this verse, his lineage is also significant, giving rise to various tribes primarily located in the Arabian Peninsula, further illustrating the widespread dispersion of humanity.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 1:19 is Etiology. The verse explicitly provides the reason for Peleg's name ("because in his days the earth was divided"), explaining the origin of a significant name by linking it to a major historical event. This etiological explanation serves to embed the historical reality of human dispersion within the very lineage of humanity. Furthermore, there is a clear instance of Wordplay or Punning, as the name Peleg (פֶלֶג, Peleg') is directly derived from and sounds like the Hebrew verb for "divided" (פָּלָג, pâlag'). This linguistic connection reinforces the meaning and significance of the name. The entire context of 1 Chronicles 1 is, of course, a Genealogy, a literary form used to establish historical continuity, identity, and the unfolding of God's plan through specific lineages.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 1:19, though brief, carries profound theological weight, connecting the lineage of Israel to the broader narrative of humanity's origins and God's sovereign governance over history. The "division of the earth" in Peleg's days is a clear allusion to the events at the Tower of Babel, where human pride and a unified rebellion against God's command to "fill the earth" led to divine judgment in the form of linguistic confusion and global dispersion. This act of division, while a consequence of sin, simultaneously served God's redemptive purpose by preventing a monolithic, godless empire and ensuring the spread of humanity across the globe, fulfilling the creation mandate. It underscores that even in judgment, God works to achieve His purposes, demonstrating His ultimate control over the destiny of nations and the boundaries of peoples.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This seemingly simple genealogical note in 1 Chronicles 1:19 offers rich ground for reflection. It reminds us that our individual lives and family histories are part of a much larger, divinely orchestrated narrative. The "division of the earth" in Peleg's time, born out of human rebellion, highlights the profound and lasting consequences of turning away from God. Yet, it also reveals God's patient yet firm hand in guiding humanity's development, even through acts of judgment, to ensure His ultimate purposes are fulfilled. For believers today, this verse serves as a powerful reminder of our shared human origin and the ongoing need for reconciliation and unity in a world still marked by division. It calls us to recognize the beauty and challenge of human diversity, understanding that while languages and cultures may divide, our common humanity and the call to unity in Christ transcend these earthly distinctions. It challenges us to consider how we might contribute to bridging divides, whether cultural, social, or spiritual, in our own contexts.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the concept of "division" in Peleg's time resonate with divisions we see in the world today, and what is our role as believers in response?
  • What does this verse teach us about the significance of names, both in biblical times and in our own lives?
  • How does God's sovereign control over historical events, even those born of human sin, encourage or challenge your faith?

FAQ

What does "the earth was divided" refer to in 1 Chronicles 1:19?

Answer: The phrase "the earth was divided" in 1 Chronicles 1:19 is widely understood by biblical scholars to be a direct reference to the events surrounding the Tower of Babel, as described in Genesis 11:1-9. In this narrative, humanity, speaking one language, united to build a tower reaching to the heavens, an act of collective pride and rebellion against God's command to "fill the earth" (Genesis 9:1). In response, God confused their languages and scattered them across the face of the earth, leading to the formation of distinct nations and linguistic groups. Thus, Peleg's name, meaning "division," serves as an etiological marker commemorating this pivotal moment in human history.

Why are genealogies so important in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies in 1 Chronicles are crucial for several reasons, especially for the post-exilic community to whom the book was originally addressed. Firstly, they establish identity and continuity, linking the returning exiles back to their ancestral roots, Abraham, and ultimately Adam, reinforcing their place within God's covenant history. Secondly, they validate land claims and tribal inheritances, which were essential for rebuilding life in the Promised Land. Thirdly, they confirm legitimate leadership and priestly lines, ensuring proper worship and governance. By meticulously listing these lineages, the Chronicler provided a foundational sense of belonging, purpose, and hope, reminding the people that despite their exile, God's promises and their heritage remained intact.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The division of the earth in Peleg's days, a consequence of human rebellion at Babel, foreshadows the deep-seated divisions that would plague humanity throughout history—ethnic, linguistic, and cultural barriers that separate people. However, this ancient historical event finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Where humanity was scattered by judgment, Christ unites by grace. He is the true Peacemaker who, through His crucifixion, broke down the dividing wall of hostility that separated Jew and Gentile, creating "one new humanity" (Ephesians 2:14-16). The Pentecost event, where people from "every nation under heaven" heard the gospel in their own languages (Acts 2:5-11), stands as a powerful reversal of Babel, demonstrating God's redemptive plan to gather a people for Himself from every tribe, tongue, and nation. Ultimately, the vision of the new heavens and new earth reveals a reconciled humanity, a vast multitude from every nation, standing before the throne and the Lamb, united in worship (Revelation 7:9-10), a testament to Christ's triumph over the divisions of sin and history.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 1–27

This paragraph has Adam for its first word and Abraham for its last. Between the creation of the former and the birth of the latter were 2000 years, almost the one-half of which time Adam himself lived. Adam was the common father of our flesh, Abraham the common father of the faithful. By the breach which the former made of the covenant of innocency, we were all made miserable; by the covenant of grace made with the latter, we all are, or may be, made happy. We all are, by nature, the seed of Adam, branches of that wild olive. Let us see to it that, by faith, we become the seed of Abraham (Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12), that we be grafted into the good olive and partake of its root and fatness.

I. The first four verses of this paragraph, and the last four, which are linked together by Shem (Ch1 1:4, Ch1 1:24), contain the sacred line of Christ from Adam to Abraham, and are inserted in his pedigree, Luk 3:34-38, the order ascending as here it descends. This genealogy proves the falsehood of that reproach, As for this man, we know not whence he is. Bishop Patrick well observes here that, a genealogy being to be drawn of the families of the Jews, this appears as the peculiar glory of the Jewish nation, that they alone were able to derive their pedigree from the first man that God created, which no other nation pretended to, but abused themselves and their posterity with fabulous accounts of their originals, the Arcadians fancying that they were before the moon, the people of Thessaly that they sprang from stones, the Athenians that they grew out of the earth, much like the vain imaginations which some of the philosophers had of the origin of the universe. The account which the holy scripture gives both of the creation of the world and of the rise of nations carries with it as clear evidences of its own truth as those idle traditions do of their own vanity and falsehood.

II. All the verses between repeat the account of the replenishing of the earth by the sons of Noah after the flood. 1. The historian begins with those who were strangers to the church, the sons of Japhet, who were planted in the isles of the Gentiles, those western parts of the world, the countries of Europe. Of these he gives a short account (Ch1 1:5-7), because with these the Jews had hitherto had little or no dealings. 2. He proceeds to those who had many of them been enemies to the church, the sons of Ham, who moved southward towards Africa and those parts of Asia which lay that way. Nimrod the son of Cush began to be an oppressor, probably to the people of God in his time. But Mizraim, from whom came the Egyptians, and Canaan, from whom came the Canaanites, are both of them names of great note in the Jewish story; for with their descendants the Israel of God had severe struggles to get out of the land of Egypt and into the land of Canaan; and therefore the branches of Mizraim are particularly recorded (Ch1 1:11, Ch1 1:12), and of Canaan, Ch1 1:13-16. See at what a rate God valued Israel when he gave Egypt for their ransom (Isa 43:3), and cast out all these nations before them, Psa 80:8. 3. He then gives an account of those that were the ancestors and allies of the church, the posterity of Shem, Ch1 1:17-23. These peopled Asia, and spread themselves eastward. The Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, Persians, and Arabians, descended from these. At first the originals of the respective nations were known; but at this day, we have reason to think, the nations are so mingled with one another, by the enlargement of commerce and dominion, the transplanting of colonies, the carrying away of captives, and many other circumstances, that no one nation, no, nor the greatest part of any, is descended entire from any one of these fountains. Only this we are sure of, that God has created of one blood all nations of men; they have all descended from one Adam, one Noah. Have we not all one father? Has not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Our register hastens to the line of Abraham, breaking off abruptly from all the other families of the sons of Noah but that of Arphaxad, from whom Christ was to come. The great promise of the Messiah (says bishop Patrick) was translated from Adam to Seth, from him to Shem, from him to Eber, and so to the Hebrew nation, who were entrusted, above all nations, with that sacred treasure, till the promise was performed and the Messiah had come, and then that nation was made not a people.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
Heber, from whom the Hebrews descended, because of a prophecy gave his son the name Phaleg which means 'division', on account of the fact that in his days the languages were divided up in Babylon. (St. Jerome On Hebrew Names)
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.