Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Will the Lord cast off for ever? and will he be favourable no more?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Will the Lord H136 cast off H2186 H8799 for ever H5769? and will H3254 H8686 he be favourable H7521 H8800 no more?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Will Adonai reject forever? will he never show his favor again?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“Will the Lord spurn us forever and never show His favor again?
Ask
American Standard Version
Will the Lord cast off for ever? And will he be favorable no more?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“Will the Lord reject us forever? Will he be favorable no more?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Will the Lord absent him selfe for euer? and will he shewe no more fauour?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
To the ages doth the Lord cast off? Doth He add to be pleased no more?
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Psalms 77:7 captures the psalmist Asaph's profound spiritual anguish and doubt, articulating a desperate cry to God in a moment of deep distress. It poses two piercing rhetorical questions: "Will the Lord cast off for ever? and will he be favourable no more?" These questions express a deep-seated fear that God's covenant loyalty and active goodwill towards His people have permanently ceased, reflecting a universal human experience of spiritual crisis where one grapples with the perceived absence or withdrawal of divine favor amidst overwhelming suffering.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Psalms 77 is a deeply personal lament psalm, opening with the psalmist's intense suffering and fervent cry to God in verses 1-6. Asaph describes his sleepless nights, incessant groaning, and an overwhelming spirit, finding no comfort even in remembering past blessings. Verses 7-9 introduce a series of five rhetorical questions, of which verse 7 is the first, probing God's faithfulness, mercy, and enduring promises. This section marks the emotional climax of the psalmist's despair before a significant turning point in verse 10, where he resolves to remember God's mighty deeds of old. The psalm then shifts dramatically from personal lament to a communal remembrance of God's powerful acts of deliverance, particularly the Exodus, culminating in a renewed trust in God's unchanging character and redemptive history.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: While the specific historical occasion for Asaph's lament is not explicitly stated, the language suggests a period of profound national or personal calamity, possibly an exile, invasion, or severe oppression, where God's people felt abandoned. In ancient Israel, God's "favor" (Hebrew: ratzah) was intrinsically linked to His covenant relationship with His people, signifying His acceptance, pleasure, and active blessing. To be "cast off" (Hebrew: zanach) implied a breach of this covenant, a terrifying prospect for a people whose identity and security were rooted in their relationship with Yahweh. The act of lamenting through rhetorical questions was a common biblical practice, not necessarily an expression of theological disbelief, but rather a raw, honest outpouring of pain and a desperate plea for God to act, drawing on the deep conviction that God could and should intervene based on His character and past actions, as seen in other laments like Psalm 13.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully articulates the human experience of doubt and despair within the journey of faith. It normalizes the difficult emotions of questioning God's presence and commitment during periods of suffering or perceived absence, demonstrating that even devout individuals can wrestle with such profound spiritual crises. Underlying this is a deep concern for God's enduring favor and covenant faithfulness. The psalmist's fear that God's ratzah (favor, acceptance) has been withdrawn highlights the preciousness of God's active goodwill and the terror of its perceived loss. This directly touches upon the foundational belief that God's covenant with Israel, particularly the Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants, was eternal and unbreakable. The psalmist is wrestling with the tension between his present suffering and God's historical pattern of deliverance and love, a tension ultimately resolved by the psalm's affirmation of God's unfailing character and redemptive power, as God's steadfast love is proclaimed in passages like Lamentations 3:22-23.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Cast off (Hebrew, zânach', H2186): This primitive root (H2186) means "to push aside," "reject," "forsake," or "fail." It conveys a strong sense of finality and utter dismissal, implying a permanent severance of relationship. In the covenant context, it signifies the terrifying prospect of God completely withdrawing His presence and protection from His people. The psalmist's use of "for ever" (H5769, ʻôwlâm') intensifies this dread, indicating a fear of irreversible, eternal rejection.
  • Favourable (Hebrew, râtsâh', H7521): This primitive root (H7521) means "to be pleased with," "to accept," "to show goodwill," or "to delight in." It describes God's active pleasure, approval, and acceptance of His people, which is a hallmark of His covenant relationship. The question "will he be favourable no more?" expresses the agonizing fear that God's active goodwill, His delight in His people, and His willingness to accept their worship and petitions have ceased permanently. This word is often associated with acceptable sacrifices and offerings, implying a fear that even their worship is no longer pleasing to God.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Will the Lord cast off for ever?": This is the first of two rhetorical questions, expressing a profound and painful doubt about God's enduring commitment to His people. The psalmist fears that God has not merely disciplined or temporarily withdrawn, but has utterly and permanently rejected His covenant partners, severing the sacred bond. The phrase "for ever" underscores the depth of this despair, suggesting a perceived irreversible abandonment. It reflects a crisis of faith concerning God's faithfulness to His promises and His unchanging character.
  • "and will he be favourable no more?": This second question reiterates and amplifies the first, focusing on the cessation of God's active goodwill and acceptance. If God is no longer "favorable," it implies a complete withdrawal of blessing, protection, and responsiveness to prayer. This fear strikes at the heart of the covenant relationship, where God's favor was the source of life, prosperity, and security for Israel. The psalmist is questioning whether the very essence of God's benevolent disposition toward them has vanished, leaving them without divine approval or delight.

Literary Devices

Psalms 77:7 employs several powerful literary devices to convey the psalmist's deep anguish. The primary device is the Rhetorical Question, which dominates this verse and the subsequent two verses (Psalms 77:8-9). These are not questions seeking information but expressions of profound doubt, despair, and a desperate plea for reassurance. They highlight the intensity of the psalmist's emotional and spiritual struggle, giving voice to the rawest human fears in the face of perceived divine silence. Parallelism is also evident, specifically a form of synonymous or amplifying parallelism, where the second question ("will he be favourable no more?") echoes and intensifies the first ("Will the Lord cast off for ever?"). Both clauses convey the same core fear of God's permanent rejection and withdrawal of favor, reinforcing the depth of the psalmist's perceived abandonment. Finally, there is an element of Hyperbole in the use of "for ever" and "no more," reflecting the overwhelming nature of the psalmist's present suffering, which makes the cessation of God's favor feel absolute and eternal, even if intellectually the psalmist knows God's covenant is everlasting.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Psalms 77:7 profoundly connects to the broader biblical themes of God's unwavering faithfulness, the nature of lament, and the enduring covenant. Despite the psalmist's expressed doubts, the very act of bringing these questions directly to God demonstrates an underlying, albeit struggling, faith in God's character and His ability to hear and respond. This verse highlights the tension between human experience of suffering and the theological truth of God's immutability and steadfast love. It reminds us that God's favor is not based on our fluctuating feelings or circumstances, but on His eternal nature and unbreakable promises. The psalm's trajectory, moving from deep lament to a remembrance of God's mighty acts, implicitly answers these questions, affirming that God does not cast off His people forever, nor does His favor cease.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Psalms 77:7 offers profound solace to believers today by validating the reality of spiritual struggle and the normalcy of doubt within faith. It teaches us that authentic faith is not the absence of questions or despair, but the courage to bring our raw, honest emotions and deepest fears directly to God. The psalmist models a vital spiritual practice: rather than suppressing doubt or turning away from God, he pours out his heart, trusting that God is big enough to handle his most agonizing questions. This verse encourages us to anchor our hope not in fleeting emotions or challenging circumstances, but in the unchanging character of the Lord, who is indeed favorable and will never cast off His own. When we feel abandoned or that God's favor has diminished, we are called to actively remember His past faithfulness, His covenant promises, and His steadfast love, allowing the objective truth of His character to reorient our subjective experience and lead us back to trust.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life are you currently tempted to ask, "Will the Lord cast off for ever?" or "Will He be favourable no more?"
  • How does the psalmist's honesty in expressing doubt encourage you in your own faith journey?
  • What specific past acts of God's faithfulness (in your life or in biblical history) can you intentionally recall when you feel His favor has diminished?

FAQ

Is it wrong for a believer to doubt God's faithfulness or favor?

Answer: No, Psalms 77:7, along with many other biblical laments, demonstrates that it is not inherently wrong for a believer to experience doubt or question God's faithfulness, especially during times of intense suffering or perceived divine silence. The Bible provides a safe space for such raw honesty. The psalmist, a devout worshiper, brings his deepest fears and questions directly to God, indicating that God is able to handle our doubts. The key is not to dwell in doubt but to bring it before God and, like Asaph, move towards remembering God's unchanging character and His past acts of deliverance, as seen in Psalm 77:11-12. Doubt can even be a catalyst for deeper faith when it drives us to seek God more earnestly and to re-examine the foundations of our belief in His steadfast love and unwavering promises.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Psalms 77:7, with its anguished cry concerning God's potential abandonment and loss of favor, finds its ultimate and definitive answer in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The psalmist's fear of being "cast off for ever" is precisely what Christ endured on the cross. In His cry, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?," Jesus experienced the ultimate "casting off" and the withdrawal of the Father's favor, not for His own sin, but as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Through His atoning sacrifice, Christ secured eternal favor and acceptance for all who believe, ensuring that those who are "in Christ" will never be cast off. The New Covenant, established through His blood, guarantees God's enduring favor and an unbreakable relationship, as promised in Hebrews 8:10-12. Believers now stand eternally accepted and beloved, not based on their own merit or fluctuating feelings, but on the perfect and finished work of Jesus, who is our everlasting High Priest and the guarantee of God's unchanging love, interceding for us always (Hebrews 7:24-25). Thus, the terrifying questions of Psalms 77:7 are definitively answered by the cross and resurrection, where God's favor is eternally secured for His people.

Copy as

Commentary on Psalms 77 verses 1–10

We have here the lively portraiture of a good man under prevailing melancholy, fallen into and sinking in that horrible pit and that miry clay, but struggling to get out. Drooping saints, that are of a sorrowful spirit, may here as in a glass see their own faces. The conflict which the psalmist had with his griefs and fears seems to have been over when he penned this record of it; for he says (Psa 77:1), I cried unto God, and he gave ear unto me, which, while the struggle lasted, he had not the comfortable sense of, as he had afterwards; but he inserts it in the beginning of his narrative as an intimation that his trouble did not end in despair; for God heard him, and, at length, he knew that he heard him. Observe,

I. His melancholy prayers. Being afflicted, he prayed (Jam 5:13), and, being in an agony, he prayed more earnestly (Psa 77:1): My voice was unto God, and I cried, even with my voice unto God. He was full of complaints, loud complaints, but he directed them to God, and turned them all into prayers, vocal prayers, very earnest and importunate. Thus he gave vent to his grief and gained some ease; and thus he took the right way in order to relief (Psa 77:2): In the day of my trouble I sought the Lord. Note, Days of trouble must be days of prayer, days of inward trouble especially, when God seems to have withdrawn from us; we must seek him and seek till we find him. In the day of his trouble he did not seek for the diversion of business or recreation, to shake off his trouble that way, but he sought God, and his favour and grace. Those that are under trouble of mind must not think to drink it away, or laugh it away, but must pray it away. My hand was stretched out in the night and ceased not; so Dr. Hammond reads the following words, as speaking the incessant importunity of his prayers. Compare Psa 143:5, Psa 143:6.

II. His melancholy grief. Grief may then be called melancholy indeed, 1. When it admits of no intermission; such was his: My sore, or wound, ran in the night, and bled inwardly, and it ceased not, no, not in the time appointed for rest and sleep. 2. When it admits of no consolation; and that also as his case: My soul refused to be comforted; he had no mind to hearken to those that would be his comforters. As vinegar upon nitre, so is he that sings songs to a heavy heart, Pro 25:20. Nor had he any mind to think of those things that would be his comforts; he put them far from him, as one that indulged himself in sorrow. Those that are in sorrow, upon any account, do not only prejudice themselves, but affront God, if they refuse to be comforted.

III. His melancholy musings. He pored so much upon the trouble, whatever it was, personal or public, that, 1. The methods that should have relieved him did but increase his grief, Psa 77:3. (1.) One would have thought that the remembrance of God would comfort him, but it did not: I remembered God and was troubled, as poor Job (Job 23:15); I am troubled at his presence; when I consider I am afraid of him. When he remembered God his thoughts fastened only upon his justice, and wrath, and dreadful majesty, and thus God himself became a terror to him. (2.) One would have thought that pouring out his soul before God would give him ease, but it did not; he complained, and yet his spirit was overwhelmed, and sank under the load. 2. The means of his present relief were denied him, v. 4. He could not enjoy sleep, which, if it be quiet and refreshing, is a parenthesis to our griefs and cares: "Thou holdest my eyes waking with thy terrors, which make me full of tossings to and fro until the dawning of the day." He could not speak, by reason of the disorder of his thoughts, the tumult of his spirits, and the confusion his mind was in: He kept silence even from good while his heart was hot within him; he was ready to burst like a new bottle (Job 32:19), and yet so troubled that he could not speak and refresh himself. Grief never preys so much upon the spirits as when it is thus smothered and pent up.

IV. His melancholy reflections (Psa 77:5, Psa 77:6): "I have considered the days of old, and compared them with the present days; and our former prosperity does but aggravate our present calamities: for we see not the wonders that our fathers told us off." Melancholy people are apt to pore altogether upon the days of old and the years of ancient times, and to magnify them, for the justifying of their own uneasiness and discontent at the present posture of affairs. But say not thou that the former days were better than these, because it is more than thou knowest whether they were or no, Ecc 7:10. Neither let the remembrance of the comforts we have lost make us unthankful for those that are left, or impatient under our crosses. Particularly, he called to remembrance his song in the night, the comforts with which he had supported himself in his former sorrows and entertained himself in his former solitude. These songs he remembered, and tried if he could not sing them over again; but he was out of tune for them, and the remembrance of them did but pour out his soul in him, Psa 43:4. See Job 35:10.

V. His melancholy fears and apprehensions: "I communed with my own heart, Psa 77:6. Come, my soul, what will be the issue of these things? What can I think of them and what can I expect they will come to at last? I made diligent search into the causes of my trouble, enquiring wherefore God contended with me and what would be the consequences of it. And thus I began to reason, Will the Lord cast off for ever, as he does for the present? He is not now favourable; and will he be favourable no more? His mercy is now gone; and is it clean gone for ever? His promise now fails; and does it fail for evermore? God is not now gracious; but has he forgotten to be gracious? His tender mercies have been withheld, perhaps in wisdom; but are they shut up, shut up in anger?" Psa 77:7-9. This is the language of a disconsolate deserted soul, walking in darkness and having no light, a case not uncommon even with those that fear the Lord and obey the voice of his servant, Isa 50:10. He may here be looked upon, 1. As groaning under a sore trouble. God hid his face from him, and withdrew the usual tokens of his favour. Note, Spiritual trouble is of all trouble most grievous to a gracious soul; nothing wounds and pierces it like the apprehensions of God's being angry, the suspending of his favour and the superseding of his promise; this wounds the spirit; and who can bear that? 2. As grappling with a strong temptation. Note, God's own people, in a cloudy and dark day, may be tempted to make desperate conclusions about their own spiritual state and the condition of God's church and kingdom in the world, and, as to both, to give up all for gone. We may be tempted to think that God has abandoned us and cast us off, that the covenant of grace fails us, and that the tender mercy of our God shall be for ever withheld from us. But we must not give way to such suggestions as these. If fear and melancholy ask such peevish questions, let faith answer them from the Scripture: Will the Lord cast off for ever? God forbid, Rom 11:1. No; the Lord will not cast off his people, Psa 94:14. Will he be favourable no more? Yes, he will; for, though he cause grief, yet will he have compassion, Lam 3:32. Is his mercy clean gone for ever? No; his mercy endures for ever; as it is from everlasting, it is to everlasting, Psa 103:17. Doth his promise fail for evermore? No; it is impossible for God to lie, Heb 6:18. Hath God forgotten to be gracious? No; he cannot deny himself, and his own name which he hath proclaimed gracious and merciful, Exo 34:6. Has he in anger shut up his tender mercies? No; they are new every morning (Lam 3:23); and therefore, How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? Hos 11:8, Hos 11:9. Thus was he going on with his dark and dismal apprehensions when, on a sudden, he first checked himself with that word, Selah, "Stop there; go no further; let us hear no more of these unbelieving surmises;" and he then chid himself (Psa 77:10): I said, This is my infirmity. He is soon aware that it is not well said, and therefore, "Why art thou cast down, O my soul? I said, This is my affliction" (so some understand it); "This is the calamity that falls to my lot and I must make the best of it; every one has his affliction, his trouble in the flesh; and this is mine, the cross I must take up." Or, rather, "This is my sin; it is my iniquity, the plague of my own heart." These doubts and fears proceed from the want and weakness of faith and the corruption of a distempered mind. note, (1.) We all know that concerning ourselves of which we must say, "This is our infirmity, a sin that most easily besets us." (2.) Despondency of spirit, and distrust of God, under affliction, are too often the infirmities of good people, and, as such, are to be reflected upon by us with sorrow and shame, as by the psalmist here: This is my infirmity. When at any time it is working in us we must thus suppress the rising of it, and not suffer the evil spirit to speak. We must argue down the insurrections of unbelief, as the psalmist here: But I will remember the years of the right hand of the Most High. He had been considering the years of ancient times (Psa 77:5), the blessings formerly enjoyed, the remembrance of which did only add to his grief; but now he considered them as the years of the right hand of the Most High, that those blessings of ancient times came from the Ancient of days, from the power and sovereign disposal of his right hand who is over all, God, blessed for ever, and this satisfied him; for may not the Most High with his right hand make what changes he pleases?

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Gregory of NyssaAD 395
AGAINST EUNOMIUS 6:3
Sufficient defense has been offered on these points, and as for that which Eunomius says by way of calumny against our doctrine, that “Christ was emptied to become himself” there has been sufficient discussion in what has been said above, where he has been shown to be attributing to our doctrine his own blasphemy. For a person who believes that the unchangeable [divine] nature has put on the created and perishable [human nature] is not one who speaks of the transition from like to like but one who believes that the divine nature does not change into the more lowly [human nature]. For if, as their doctrine asserts, he is created, and a human being is created also, the wonder of the doctrine disappears, and there is nothing marvelous in what is alleged, since the created nature comes to be in itself. But we who have learned from prophecy of “the change of the right hand of the Most High”—and by the “Right Hand” of the Father we understand that power of God, which made all things, which is the Lord (not in the sense of depending on him as a part upon a whole but as being indeed from him and yet contemplated in individual existence)—say thus: that neither does the right hand vary from him whose right hand it is, in regard to the idea of its nature, nor can any other change in it be spoken of besides the accommodation to the flesh. For truly the right hand of God was God himself; manifested in the flesh, seen through that same flesh by those whose sight was clear; as he did the work of the Father, being, both in fact and in thought, the right hand of God, yet being changed, in respect of the veil of the flesh by which he was surrounded, as regarded that which was seen, from that which he was by nature, as a subject of contemplation. Therefore he says to Philip, who was gazing only at that which was changed, “Look through that which is changed to that which is unchangeable, and if you see this, you have seen that Father, whom you seek to see; for he that has seen me—not him who appears in a state of change, but my very self, who am in the Father—will have seen that Father in whom I am, because the very same character of Godhead is beheld in both.” If, then, we believe that the immortal and impassible and uncreated nature came to be in the nature of the creature that is capable of suffering, and conceive the “change” to consist in this, on what grounds are we charged with saying that he “set aside his divine powers to become incarnate,” by those who keep presenting their own statements about our doctrines? For the participation of the created with the created is no “change of the right hand.” To say that the right hand of the uncreated nature is created belongs to Eunomius alone and to those who adopt such opinions as he holds. For the person with an eye that looks on the truth will discern the right hand of the Highest to be such as he sees the Highest to be—Uncreated of Uncreated, Good of Good, Eternal of Eternal without prejudice to its eternity by its being in the Father by way of generation. Thus our accuser has unawares been employing against us reproaches that properly fall on himself.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Exposition on Psalm 77
And you have found what? "God will not repel for everlasting" [Psalm 77:7]. Weariness he had found in this life; in no place a trustworthy, in no place a fearless comfort. Unto whatsoever men he betook himself, in them he found scandal, or feared it. In no place therefore was he free from care. An evil thing it was for him to hold his peace, lest perchance he should keep silence from good words; to speak and babble without was painful to him, lest all his enemies, anticipating watches, should seek slanders in his words. Being exceedingly straitened in this life, he thought much of another life, where there is not this trial. And when is he to arrive there? For it cannot but be evident that our suffering here is the anger of God. This thing is spoken of in Isaiah, "I will not be an avenger unto you for everlasting, nor will I be angry with you at all times." [Isaiah 57:16] ...Will this anger of God always abide? This man has not found this in silence. For he says what? "God will not repel for everlasting, and He will not add any more that it should be well-pleasing to Him still." That is, that it should be well-pleasing to Him still to repel, and He will not add the repelling for everlasting. He must needs recall to Himself His servants, He must needs receive fugitives returning to the Lord, He must needs hearken to the voice of them that are in fetters. "Or unto the end will He cut off mercy from generation to generation?" [Psalm 77:8].
Leo the GreatAD 461
SERMON 27:2.2
What mind can understand this mystery, what tongue has the capability of explaining this grace? Iniquity turns back into innocence, oldness into newness. Strangers come into adoption, and foreigners enter on an inheritance. Godless people have started to be just, the covetous to be beneficent, the incontinent to be chaste, the “earthly” to be “heavenly.” What has effected “this change” but the “right hand of the Most High”? For “the Son of God came to undo the devil’s works.” He grafted himself into us and us into himself in such a way that God’s descent to human affairs became the elevation of human beings to those divine.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
LETTER 9:122
I cannot express in words, most excellent son, how much I am delighted with your work and your life. For on hearing of the power of a new miracle in our days, to wit, that the whole nation of the Goths has through your excellency been brought over from the error of the Arian heresy to the firmness of a right faith, one is disposed to exclaim with the prophet, “This is the change wrought by the right hand of the most High.” For whose breast, even though stony, would not, on hearing of so great a work, soften in praises of almighty God and love of your excellency? As for me, I declare that it delights me often to tell these things that have been done through you to my sons who consult with me, and often together with them I marvel at these things. These things also for the most part cause me to become critical of myself, in that I languish sluggish and unprofitable in listless ease, while kings are laboring in the gathering together of souls for the gains of the heavenly country.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Psalms 77:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.