Skip to content

Romans 11:2

“God Has Not Rejected Israel”Romans 11:1–10

King James Version
God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
God G2316 hath G683 not G3756 cast away G683 his G846 people G2992 which G3739 he foreknew G4267.G2228 Wot ye G1492 not G3756 what G5101 the scripture G1124 saith G3004 of G1722 Elias G2243? how G5613 he maketh intercession G1793 to God G2316 against G2596 Israel G2474, saying G3004,

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
God did not reject His people, whom He foreknew. Do you not know what the Scripture says about Elijah, how he appealed to God against Israel:

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
God did not cast off his people which he foreknew. Or know ye not what the scripture saith of Elijah? how he pleadeth with God against Israel:

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
God didn’t reject his people, which he foreknew. Or don’t you know what the Scripture says about Elijah? How he pleads with God against Israel:

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
God hath not cast away his people which he knew before. Know ye not what the Scripture sayth of Elias, howe hee communeth with God against Israel, saying,

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
God did not cast away His people whom He knew before; have ye not known--in Elijah--what the Writing saith? how he doth plead with God concerning Israel, saying,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
26 Greek words
  1. οὐκoukNotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  2. ἀπώσατοapōsatodid rejectG683V-ADI-3SVerb Aorist Middle Deponent Indicative 3rd Singular
  3. ὁho[the]G3588T-NSMDefinite article Nominative Singular Masculine
  4. θεὸςtheosGodG2316N-NSM-TNoun Nominative Singular Masculine Title
  5. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  6. λαὸνlaonpeopleG2992N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  7. αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
  8. ὃνhonwhomG3739R-ASMRelative pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  9. προέγνωproegnōHe foreknewG4267V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  10. ἪĒOrG2228CONJConjunction
  11. οὐκouknotG3756PRT-NNegative Particle Negative
  12. οἴδατεoidateknow youG1492V-RAI-2PVerb Perfect Active Indicative 2nd Plural
  13. ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
  14. ἨλίᾳĒliaElijahG2243N-DSM-PNoun Dative Singular Masculine Individual
  15. τίtiwhatG5101I-ASNInterrogative pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  16. λέγειlegeisaysG3004V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  17. ἡhētheG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
  18. γραφήgraphēScriptureG1124N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
  19. ὡςhōshowG5613PRTParticle or Disjunctive
  20. ἐντυγχάνειentugchaneihe pleadsG1793V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  21. τῷtō[the]G3588T-DSMDefinite article Dative Singular Masculine
  22. θεῷtheōwith GodG2316N-DSM-TNoun Dative Singular Masculine Title
  23. κατὰkataagainstG2596PREPPreposition
  24. τοῦtou[the]G3588T-GSMDefinite article Genitive Singular Masculine
  25. ἸσραήλIsraēlIsraelG2474N-GSM-LNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Location
  26. λέγων;legōnsayingG3004V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 28,212 of 31,102 · 90.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

God has kept the people he foreknew, and Paul turns to Scripture’s account of Elijah, who pleaded with God against Israel.

“God hath not cast away his people”

The question of verse 1 returns as a statement of fact, in nearly the same words.

“which he foreknew.”

God’s knowing came first, before Israel had done anything, good or bad.

“Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias?”

Paul appeals to Scripture, which his readers already knew and trusted.

“how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,”

Elijah’s prayer was an accusation brought against his own nation.

Passage studyRomans 11:1–10

God Has Not Cast Away His People

1I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying, 3Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. 4But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. 5Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. 6And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. 7What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded 8(According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day. 9And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: 10Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.

Summary

After grieving over Israel’s unbelief in the two chapters before, Paul asks the question that grief raises: “Hath God cast away his people?” His answer is “God forbid.” Paul, an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin, is himself the proof, and Elijah’s story shows the pattern. When the prophet thought he was the last faithful man in Israel, God told him he had kept seven thousand for himself who had refused to bow to Baal. In the same way, in Paul’s day there is “a remnant according to the election of grace,” and grace by its nature shuts out works. Israel as a whole missed what it sought, the chosen obtained it, and the rest were hardened, as Moses, Isaiah and David had written. Here we see God’s faithfulness to his promises, his freedom in grace and the seriousness of his judgment on unbelief.

Has God cast away his people?

God has kept faith with Israel, and Paul rejects the opposite thought with all the force he can. The question comes straight out of Romans 9 and Romans 10, where Paul grieved over Israel’s unbelief and showed that most of the nation had refused the righteousness that comes by faith in Christ. Gentile believers were growing in number in the churches, and some could easily conclude that God had finished with his ancient people. “I say then, Hath God cast away his people?” puts that conclusion into words so that Paul can answer it, and the rest of Romans 11 carries the answer through.

The verb for “cast away”, apōthéomai, means to push off, to thrust something away. Used of God and his people, it would mean that he had disowned his covenant with them. “God forbid” stands for the Greek mē genoito, made of the particle mḗ with a form of gínomai, “to become” or “to come into being”. Together they mean “may it never be”, and the ESV gives “By no means!” It is Paul’s strongest way of turning away a false conclusion. He uses it when he refuses to let Israel’s unbelief cancel the faithfulness of God (Romans 3:3–4) and when he answers the suggestion that believers should go on in sin (Romans 6:2). To Paul, the thought of God abandoning his people is unthinkable.

Verse 2 repeats the answer as a plain statement and adds a reason: “God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew.” The verb proginṓskō means to know beforehand. Said of God and Israel, it speaks of his choosing them and setting his purpose on them before they existed, the truth Paul set out in Romans 8:29–30 for all whom God foreknew and predestined. Because God’s choice came first, Israel’s later failures are powerless to undo it. Scripture had said so long before. Samuel told Israel, “the LORD will not forsake his people for his great name’s sake” (1 Samuel 12:22), a psalm says, “the LORD will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance” (Psalm 94:14), and through Jeremiah God declared his covenant with Israel unbreakable (Jeremiah 31:35–37).

Paul himself is the proof

“For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.” Paul offers himself as living evidence. Israēlítēs means a descendant of Israel, that is, of Jacob, and it names both a man’s birth and his place in God’s covenant people. “The seed of Abraham” ties Paul to the first promises, and “the tribe of Benjamin” names his own place within the nation. Benjamin was the tribe of Saul, Israel’s first king, whose name Paul also bore. Paul had been a Pharisee and a zealous Jew, and God had brought him to faith in Jesus as the Messiah. If God had cast away his people, Paul would stand outside the promise, and here he is, an apostle writing to Rome. His salvation is a small picture of God’s continuing work in Israel, and faith in Christ brought his Jewish heritage to its fulfilment.

Will every Israelite be saved?

Jew and Gentile alike are saved through faith in Jesus Christ, which is the burden of Romans 10. Paul has already said that “they are not all Israel, which are of Israel” (Romans 9:6). What verse 1 affirms is God’s faithfulness to Israel as a people. It points ahead to the remnant of verse 5, and to the salvation of Israel that Paul describes later in the chapter, when the fulness of the Gentiles has come in (Romans 11:25–26).

Elijah thought he stood alone

“Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias?” “Wot” is old English for “know”, and the Greek verb is eídō, properly “to see”, and so “to know”. Paul is asking, “Do you not know?” and he expects his readers to know the story well. Elias is Elijah, and the scripture Paul means is 1 Kings 19.

Much of the account of Ahab, Jezebel and Elijah runs through 1 Kings 16–19. Ahab ruled the northern kingdom of Israel, and his wife Jezebel, a Phoenician princess, promoted the worship of Baal and Asherah and killed the prophets of the LORD (1 Kings 18:4). After Elijah’s victory over the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18), Jezebel threatened his life and he fled into the wilderness. There he poured out his complaint.

Paul says that Elijah “maketh intercession to God against Israel”. The verb entynchánō means to meet with someone, and so to confer with them and to plead with them, whether for another person or against. Elijah came before God as an accuser of his own people.

Verse 3 gives his words, which Paul takes from 1 Kings 19:10, and Elijah said them a second time in 1 Kings 19:14: “Lord, they have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.” The verb for “killed”, apokteínō, means to kill, and here it describes the prophets put to death under Jezebel. The altars, thysiastḗrion, “a place of sacrifice”, were altars to the LORD, and tearing them down was a deliberate rejection of him in favour of idols. “My life” is psychḗ, breath, the life that animates a body. Elijah’s enemies meant to kill him.

Elijah’s cry is a lament, and the danger and loneliness behind it were real. Yet “I am left alone” was larger than the truth, as God’s answer shows. A faithful servant of God, worn out and hunted, saw only the ruin around him and concluded that he was the last one left.

God’s answer: seven thousand kept for himself

“But what saith the answer of God unto him?” The word chrēmatismós means a divine response, an answer from God himself, and it sets God’s word over against Elijah’s estimate. God said, “I have reserved to myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal,” which Paul takes from 1 Kings 19:18. The verb kataleípō means to leave behind, to have remaining, and “to myself” makes their survival God’s own act. He kept these men for himself. Their faithfulness was real, and the One who held them in it was God.

Elijah knew none of them, and God knew every one. Whether the number is an exact count or a picture of a full and sufficient company, it was far larger than the one man Elijah could see.

What bowing the knee to Baal meant

To bow the knee was the gesture of worship. kámptō means to bend, and góny is the knee, and together they describe an act of homage and submission. Báal, a name of Hebrew origin, was a Canaanite god of fertility and storms, and his worship was the idolatry Jezebel pressed on Israel. The words “the image of” are supplied by the KJV’s translators. The seven thousand refused that public pledge of allegiance in a land whose king and queen demanded it.

Their stand is the one the Ten Commandments require when they forbid other gods and graven images (Exodus 20:3–5), and Paul tells the Corinthians in the same spirit, “flee from idolatry” (1 Corinthians 10:14). Whatever takes God’s place is a Baal, whether wealth, power, fame, an ideology or the self, for that is worshipping and serving the creature more than the Creator (Romans 1:25). And the knee that stays unbent before Baal bows gladly to the true Lord, at whose name every knee shall bow (Philippians 2:10–11).

A remnant according to the election of grace

“Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.” The words “Even so then” tie Paul’s day to Elijah’s, and “at this present time” (en tō nŷn kairō) brings the same pattern into the present. What God did then, he is doing now. “There is” stands for a form of gínomai: a remnant has come into being. The word for remnant, leîmma, means a remainder, what is left of a larger whole.

The prophets had spoken of a remnant for centuries. Isaiah said that the LORD of hosts had left Israel a remnant (Isaiah 1:9) and that a remnant would return (Isaiah 10:20–22), and through Jeremiah God promised to gather the remnant of his flock (Jeremiah 23:3). In times of judgment and exile, that promise kept hope alive. In Paul’s day the remnant was the Jews who had believed in Jesus as the Messiah, Paul among them.

Its foundation is “the election of grace” (katá eklogḗn cháritos). eklogḗ is selection, God’s own choosing, and cháris is graciousness, favour freely given. Put together, the remnant exists because God chose them, and he chose them out of free favour. The whole cause lies in God, and none of it in their descent, their effort or their keeping of the law. Paul says the same of every believer: we are saved by grace through faith, “not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9). Peter writes to believers as “elect according to the foreknowledge of God” (1 Peter 1:2), and Jesus said that those who come to him come because the Father draws them (John 6:44). God’s faithfulness holds even through his people’s unbelief: “If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful” (2 Timothy 2:13).

Is the remnant Jewish or Gentile?

In this verse the remnant is Israelite: Jewish people who believed in Jesus as the Messiah. Paul’s argument through Romans 9–11 concerns God’s dealings with Israel. The principle behind it reaches every believer, because God justifies Jew and Gentile alike by faith (Romans 3:29–30), and in Christ “there is neither Jew nor Greek” (Galatians 3:28).

Does election leave room for our believing?

Paul’s emphasis is on God’s choice as the first cause of salvation. The remnant exists because God chose them by grace, and they believed. Scripture also calls every person to believe, as in John 3:16, and both truths stand together. Believers differ on how they fit. Some hold that God’s choice rests on nothing in the person, so that even faith is his gift, and others hold that God chose those he foreknew would believe. On either reading this verse gives the glory to God, since the remnant owes its place to his favour.

Why grace and works exclude each other

“And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.” Paul states the point from both sides. cháris is God’s favour given freely to the undeserving, and érgon is work, a deed or labour, here the effort by which a person would try to earn God’s favour, above all by keeping the law of Moses. “No more” is oukéti, “no longer”. The phrase “no more” stands four times in this verse, and each time it shows one principle shutting the other out.

The reasoning is simple. If the remnant were chosen for their works, God’s choice would be wages, and grace would have lost the very thing that makes it grace, which is that it is free. If the reward is a free gift, work loses the thing that makes it work, which is that it earns. A gift that is partly earned is a contradiction in terms. So salvation rests wholly on God’s free favour, all boasting is shut out, and all the glory goes to God. Paul says it again and again: “by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight” (Romans 3:20), a man is justified by the faith of Jesus Christ (Galatians 2:16), and God saved us “according to his mercy” (Titus 3:5). He makes the case at length in Romans 3:21–28.

For Paul’s Jewish readers, life with God had long been bound up with the law of Moses, with circumcision, the food laws and the Sabbath. Paul shows that even the remnant of Israel stands on grace. The law had its own purpose, to show God’s righteousness, to expose sin and to point to the need of a Saviour, and Christ is “the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:3–4).

Do good works still matter?

Good works matter as the fruit of grace. Paul says that we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works that God prepared for us to walk in (Ephesians 2:10). Believers do them because they have been saved, out of thanks and love, by the strength the Holy Spirit gives, and they are the evidence of real faith. Grace removes works only as the price of salvation.

Israel sought it, and the chosen obtained it

“What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.” Paul gathers up the argument. What Israel sought was righteousness before God. They pursued it by the law, as if it could be had by works, and stumbled at the stumbling stone (Romans 9:30–32). Going about to establish their own righteousness, they “have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God” (Romans 10:3–4).

The verb epitynchánō means to chance upon, and so to attain or obtain. “The election” is the same word as in verse 5, eklogḗ, used here for the chosen people themselves, the remnant God had picked out. They obtained what the nation sought, by God’s choosing and through faith in Christ, in line with what Paul showed of God’s free choice in Romans 9:6–13.

“The rest were blinded.” The verb pōróō means to turn to stone, and so to harden, to make dull or callous. It describes a heart grown hard toward the truth about Jesus as the Messiah, in the majority of Israel who refused to believe. Isaiah was sent with a message of hardening to his own generation (Isaiah 6:9–10), and John says that the unbelief Jesus met answered to that word (John 12:39–40). This hardening came as the consequence of unbelief, and Paul goes on to show that God used it for his purpose, opening the way of salvation to the Gentiles (Romans 11:11–32).

God gave them the spirit of slumber

Paul grounds the hardening in Scripture with “according as it is written”, drawing on two passages. Isaiah wrote, “For the LORD hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes” (Isaiah 29:10), and Moses told Israel, “Yet the LORD hath not given you an heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day” (Deuteronomy 29:4). Paul joins them, and the words “unto this day” carry Moses’ sentence into his own generation.

“Hath given” is dídōmi, to give, and the giver is God. The “slumber”, katányxis, is a word for a prickling, the numbness of a limb that has gone to sleep, and so a stupor or deep insensibility. The people had eyes and ears, and both were closed to what God was showing them. Jesus spoke the same way of the crowds who heard his parables: “because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand” (Matthew 13:13). “Unto this day” uses hēméra, the ordinary word for day, and here it marks a condition that had lasted from Moses to Paul.

Let their table be made a snare

Verses 9 and 10 quote David in Psalm 69:22–23: “Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.” Dabíd is the name of King David, to whom the psalm is credited. Psalm 69 is a lament in which David prays against his enemies, and it is a psalm of the Messiah, whose words also speak of those who would oppose him. Paul applies them to those in Israel who rejected Christ.

The table, trápeza, is the word for a table, the four-legged piece of furniture where meals were eaten. In Israel the table stood for provision, fellowship and peace. Here it stands for all Israel’s privileges, the covenants, the law, the temple and God’s word, which should have led them to Christ. “Be made” is gínomai again, “become”. David prays that the place of blessing would become the place of ruin, in the way the blessings and curses of Deuteronomy 28 set before Israel. The words pile up. pagís is a snare, a trap fastened with a noose. thḗra means hunting, and so the means of catching game. skándalon, from which we have “scandal”, was the bait-stick of a trap, and then anything that trips a person and makes them fall. antapódoma is a repayment, a deserved requital, so the ruin is just and comes as the answer to unbelief.

The stumblingblock leads us to Christ. Paul preached “Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock” (1 Corinthians 1:23), Simeon said the child Jesus was “set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel” (Luke 2:34), and Peter calls Christ a stone of stumbling to those who disbelieve (1 Peter 2:8). The same Christ is the bread of life to everyone who comes to him (John 6:35), so the true table of God’s provision is found in him.

Verse 10 turns to the eyes and the back. skotízō means to make dark, to obscure, and here it is the darkening of spiritual sight. synkámptō is kámptō, the bending of the knee in verse 4, joined to a word for “together”, so it means to bend together or to stoop, and figuratively to afflict. A bowed back is the posture of someone weighed down or enslaved. It can picture the weight of sin, the bondage of those who refuse Christ’s freedom, or the yoke of the law carried without grace. diapantós means continually, through all time, and it stresses how long the burden lasts.

Christ’s own invitation answers that bent back: “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28–30). He came to give sight to the blind (Luke 4:18), and he is the light of the world, whose followers have the light of life (John 8:12).

Does God blind people against their will?

Paul says plainly that God gave the spirit of slumber, and Scripture shows this as God’s just judgment on people who had already turned from the truth he showed them. The LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart after Pharaoh had hardened it himself, again and again (Exodus 7–10). Jesus explained his use of parables in the same terms (Matthew 13:13–15). Paul’s own argument holds Israel responsible, for they stumbled over Christ and refused God’s righteousness. The hardening confirms a choice people have already made, and it is still God’s sovereign act. Both truths stand together, and the blinding falls on those who turn from revealed truth, never on those who genuinely seek God. Another power is at work too, for the god of this world blinds the minds of unbelievers so that the light of the gospel of Christ’s glory is hidden from them (2 Corinthians 4:4), and Christ breaks that power.

Does the hardening last forever?

The hardening is partial and has an end in God’s plan, as the rest of the chapter shows. Paul writes, “blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved” (Romans 11:25–26). Through Israel’s stumbling, salvation came to the Gentiles, and that in turn will provoke Israel to jealousy. Paul quotes David’s hard words with a broken heart, as one who had “great heaviness and continual sorrow” for his own people (Romans 9:1–5).

Christ and the faithful God of Israel

All of this centres on Jesus Christ. He is the seed of Abraham through whom the promise comes to the nations (Galatians 3:16). He was sent first to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 15:24), and “he came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:11). Yet in him Jew and Gentile are made one new people (Ephesians 2:11–22), and “all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen” (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Elijah pleaded against Israel, and Christ pleads for his people. He is at God’s right hand making intercession for us (Romans 8:34), and “he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25). The remnant are chosen in him before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4–6). Everyone the Father gives him comes to him, and he will lose none of them (John 6:37–40). Jude writes to those “preserved in Jesus Christ” (Jude 1:1), and Peter to those “kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation” (1 Peter 1:5). God reserved seven thousand for himself in Elijah’s day, and he keeps his own in Christ in the same way.

The grace of verse 6 comes through Christ. His one offering perfected his people for ever (Hebrews 10:10–14), “grace and truth came by Jesus Christ” (John 1:17), and through him we have access by faith into this grace (Romans 5:1–2). The slumber of verse 8 is answered in him too. Isaiah foresaw the day when the eyes of the blind would be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped (Isaiah 35:5), Jesus gave sight to a man born blind (John 9:1–41), God promised a new covenant written on the heart (Jeremiah 31:33–34), and the Spirit gives the understanding by which spiritual things are discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14). Paul prays that the eyes of believers’ understanding would be enlightened (Ephesians 1:17–18).

The God who keeps a remnant

This passage shows a God who keeps his word through his people’s unfaithfulness. He knows his own by number when his servants can count only themselves. He saves by grace alone, so that every member of the remnant, in Elijah’s day, in Paul’s and in ours, stands on his free favour. He also judges, and his judgment can turn even blessings into a snare for those who refuse his Son.

Elijah’s complaint gives words to the times when faithfulness feels lonely, and God’s answer to him still stands: he has kept more than we can see. Paul’s grief shows the heart in which these hard verses belong. Sight is God’s gift to those who have it, which leaves room only for compassion toward anyone still in the dark, and for prayer, since God alone opens eyes. The God who said “I have reserved to myself” holds his people still, and in Christ he has promised to lose none of them.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Romans 11:1–32. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 32 verses
Passage under commentRomans 11:1–32
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

The apostle proposes here a plausible objection, which might be urged against the divine conduct in casting off the Jewish nation (v. 1): "Hath God cast away his people? Is the rejection total and final? Are they all abandoned to wrath and ruin, and that eternal? Is the extent of the sentence so large as to be without reserve, or the continuance of it so long as to be without repeal? Will he have no more a peculiar people to himself?" In opposition to this, he shows that there was a great deal of goodness and mercy expressed along with this seeming severity, particularly he insists upon three things:—1. That, though some of the Jews were cast off, yet they were not all so. 2. That, though the body of the Jews were cast off, yet the Gentiles were taken in. And, 3. That, though the Jews were cast off at present, yet in God's due time they should be taken into his church again.

I.The Jews, it is true, were many of them cast off, but not all.

The supposition of this he introduces with a God forbid. He will by no means endure such a suggestions. God had made a distinction between some of them and others.

1.There was a chosen remnant of believing Jews, that obtained righteousness and life by faith in Jesus Christ, v. 1-7. These are said to be such as he foreknew (v. 2), that is, had thoughts of love to, before the world was; for whom he thus foreknew he did predestinate. her lies the ground of the difference. They are called the election (v. 7), that is, the elect, God's chosen ones, whom he calls the election, because that which first distinguished them from the dignified them above others was God's electing love. Believers are the election, all those and those only whom God hath chosen. Now,

(1.)He shows that he himself was one of them: For I also am an Israelite; as if he had said, "Should I say that all the Jews are rejected, I should cut off my own claims, and see myself abandoned." Paul was a chosen vessel (Acts ix. 15), and yet he was of the seed of Abraham, and particularly of the tribe of Benjamin, the least and youngest of all the tribes of Israel.

(2.)He suggests that as in Elias's time, so now, this chosen remnant was really more and greater than one would think it was, which intimates likewise that it is no new nor unusual thing for God's grace and favour to Israel to be limited and confined to a remnant of that people; for so it was in Elijah's time. The scripture saith it of Elias, en Elia—in the story of Elias, the great reformer of the Old Testament. Observe,

[1.]His mistake concerning Israel; as if their apostasy in the days of Ahab was so general that he himself was the only faithful servant God had in the world. He refers to 1 Kings xix. 14, where (it is here said) he maketh intercession to God against Israel. A strange kind of intercession: entynchanei to Theo kata tou Israel—He deals with God against Israel; so it may be read; so entynchano is translated, Acts xxv. 24. The Jews enetychon moi—have dealt with me. In prayer we deal with God, commune with him, discourse with him: it is said of Elijah (Jam. v. 17) that he prayed in praying. We are then likely to pray in praying, to make a business of that duty, when we pray as those that are dealing with God in the duty. Now Elijah in this prayer spoke as if there were one left faithful in Israel but himself. See to what a low ebb the profession of religion may sometimes be brought, and how much the face of it may be eclipsed, that the most wise and observing men may give it up for gone. So it was in Elijah's time. That which makes the show of a nation is the powers and the multitude. The powers of Israel were then persecuting powers: They have killed thy prophets, and digged down thine altars, and they seek my life. The multitude of Israel were then idolatrous: I am left alone. Thus those few that were faithful to God were not only lost in the crowd of idolaters, but crushed and driven into corners by the rage of persecutors. When the wicked rise, a man is hidden, Prov. xxviii. 12.—Digged down thine altars; not only neglected them, and let them go out of repair, but digged them down. When altars were set up for Baal, it is no wonder if God's altars were pulled down; they could not endure that standing testimony against their idolatry. This was his intercession against Israel; as if he had said, "Lord, is not this a people ripe for ruin, worthy to be cast off? What else canst thou do for thy great name?" It is a very sad thing for any person or people to have the prayers of God's people against them, especially of God's prophets, for God espouses, and sooner or later will visibly own, the cause of his praying people.

[2.]The rectifying of this mistake by the answer of God (v. 4): I have reserved. Note, First, Things are often much better with the church of God than wise and good men think they are. They are ready to conclude hardly, and to give up all for gone, when it is not so. Secondly, In times of general apostasy, there is usually a remnant that keep their integrity—some, though but a few; all do not go one way. Thirdly, That when there is a remnant who keep their integrity in times of general apostasy it is God that reserves to himself that remnant. If he had left them to themselves, they had gone down the stream with the rest. It is his free and almighty grace that makes the difference between them and others.—Seven thousand: a competent number to bear their testimony against the idolatry of Israel, and yet, compared with the many thousands of Israel, a very small number, one of a city, and two of a tribe, like the grape-gleanings of the vintage. Christ's flock is but a little flock; and yet, when they come all together at last, they will be a great and innumerable multitude, Rev. vii. 9. Now the description of this remnant is that they had not bowed the knee to the image of Baal, which was then the reigning sin of Israel. In court, city, and country, Baal had the ascendant; and the generality of people, more or less, paid their respect to Baal. The best evidence of integrity is a freedom from the present prevailing corruptions of the times and places that we live in, to swim against the stream when it is strong. Those God will own for his faithful witnesses that are bold in bearing their testimony to the present truth, 2 Pet. i. 12. This is thank-worthy, not to bow to Baal when every body bows. Sober singularity is commonly the badge of true sincerity.

[3.]The application of this instance to the case in hand: Even so at this present time, v. 5-7. God's methods of dispensation towards his church are as they used to be. As it has been, so it is. In Elijah's time there was a remnant, and so there is now. If then there was a remnant left under the Old Testament, when the displays of grace were less clear and the pourings out of the Spirit less plentiful, much more now under the gospel, when the grace of God, which bringeth salvation, appears more illustrious.—A remnant, a few of many, a remnant of believing Jews when the rest were obstinate in their unbelief. This is called a remnant according to the election of grace; they are such as were chosen from eternity in the counsels of divine love to be vessels of grace and glory. Whom he did predestinate those he called. If the difference between them and others be made purely by the grace of God, as certainly it is (I have reserved them, saith he, to myself), then it must needs be according to the election; for we are sure that whatever God does he does it according to the counsel of his own will. Now concerning this remnant we may observe, First, Whence it takes its rise, from the free grace of God (v. 6), that grace which excludes works. The eternal election, in which the difference between some and others is first founded, is purely of grace, free grace; not for the sake of works done or foreseen; if so, it would not be grace. Gratia non est ullo modo gratia, si non sit omni modo gratuita—It is not grace, properly so called, if it be not perfectly free. Election is purely according to the good pleasure of his will, Eph. i. 5. Paul's heart was so full of the freeness of God's grace that in the midst of his discourse he turns aside, as it were, to make this remark, If of grace, then not of works. And some observe that faith itself, which in the matter of justification if opposed to works, is here included in them; for faith has a peculiar fitness to receive the free grace of God for our justification, but not to receive that grace for our election. Secondly, What it obtains: that which Israel, that is, the body of that people, in van sought for (v. 7): Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for, that is, justification, and acceptance with God (see ch. ix. 31), but the election have obtained it. In them the promise of God has its accomplishment, and God's ancient kindness for that people is remembered. He calls the remnant of believers, not the elect, but the election, to show that the sole foundation of all their hopes and happiness is laid in election. They were the persons whom God had in his eye in the counsels of his love; they are the election; they are God's choice. Such was the favour of God to the chosen remnant. But,

2.The rest were blinded, v. 7. Some are chosen and called, and the call is made effectual. But others are left to perish in their unbelief; nay, they are made worse by that which should have made them better. The gospel, which to those that believed was the savour of life unto life, to the unbelieving was the savour of death unto death. The same sun softens wax and hardens clay. Good old Simeon foresaw that the child Jesus was set for the fall, as well as for the rising again, of many in Israel, Luke ii. 34.—Were blinded; eporothesan—they were hardened; so some. They were seared, and made brawny and insensible. They could neither see the light, nor feel the touch, of gospel grace. Blindness and hardness are expressive of the same senselessness and stupidity of spirit. They shut their eyes, and would not see; this was their sin: and then God, in a way of righteous judgment, blinded their eyes, that they could not see; this was their punishment. This seemed harsh doctrine: to qualify it, therefore, he vouches two witnesses out of the Old Testament, who speak of such a thing.

(1.)Isaiah, who spoke of such a judgment in his day, ch. xxix. 10; vi. 9. The spirit of slumber, that is, an indisposedness to mind either their duty or interest. They are under the power of a prevailing unconcernedness, like people that are slumbering and sleeping; not affected with any thing that is said or done. They were resolved to continue as they were, and would not stir. The following words explain what is meant by the spirit of slumber: Eyes, that they should not see, and ears, that they should not hear. They had the faculties, but in the things that belonged to their peace they had not the use of those faculties; they were quite infatuated, they saw Christ, but they did not believe in him; they heard his word, but they did not receive it; and so both their hearing and their seeing were in vain. It was all one as if they had neither seen nor heard. Of all judgments spiritual judgments are the sorest, and most to be dreaded, though they make the least noise.—Unto this day. Ever since Esaias prophesied, this hardening work has been in the doing; some among them have been blind and senseless. Or, rather, ever since the first preaching of the gospel: though they have had the most convincing evidences that could be of the truth of it, the most powerful preaching, the fairest offers, the clearest calls from Christ himself, and from his apostles, yet to this day they are blinded. It is still true concerning multitudes of them, even to this day in which we live; they are hardened and blinded, the obstinacy and unbelief go by succession from generation to generation, according to their own fearful imprecation, which entailed the curse: His blood be upon us and upon our children.

(2.)David (v. 9, 10), quoted from Ps. lxix. 22, 23, where David having in the Spirit foretold the sufferings of Christ from his own people the Jews, particularly that of their giving him vinegar to drink (v. 21, which was literally fulfilled, Matt. xxvii. 48), an expression of the greatest contempt and malice that could be, in the next words, under the form of an imprecation, he foretels the dreadful judgments of God upon them for it: Let their table become a snare, which the apostle here applies to the present blindness of the Jews, and the offence they took at the gospel, which increased their hardness. This teaches us how to understand other prayers of David against his enemies; they are to be looked upon as prophetic of the judgments of God upon the public and obstinate enemies of Christ and his kingdom. His prayer that it might be so was a prophecy that it should be so, and not the private expression of his own angry resentments. It was likewise intended to justify God, and to clear his righteousness in such judgments. He speaks here,

[1.]Of the ruin of their comforts: Let their table be made a snare, that is, as the psalmist explains it, Let that which should be for their welfare be a trap to them. The curse of God will turn meat into poison. It is a threatening like that in Mal. ii. 2, I will curse your blessings. Their table a snare, that is, an occasion of sin and an occasion of misery. Their very food, that should nourish them, shall choke them.

[2.]Of the ruin of their powers and faculties (v. 10), their eyes darkened, their backs bowed down, that they can neither find the right way, nor, if they could, are they able to walk in it. The Jews, after their national rejection of Christ and his gospel, became infatuated in their politics, so that their very counsels turned against them, and hastened their ruin by the Romans. They looked like a people designed for slavery and contempt, their backs bowed down, to be ridden and trampled upon by all the nations about them. Or, it may be understood spiritually; their backs are bowed down in carnality and worldly-mindedness. Curvæ in terris animæ—They mind earthly things. This is an exact description of the state and temper of the present remainder of that people, than whom, if the accounts we have of them be true, there is not a more worldly, wilful, blind, selfish, ill-natured, people in the world. They are manifestly to this day under the power of this curse. Divine curses will work long. It is a sign we have our eyes darkened if we are bowed down in worldly-mindedness.

II.Another thing which qualified this doctrine of the rejection of the Jews was that though they were cast off and unchurched, yet the Gentiles were taken in (v. 11-14), which he applies by way of caution to the Gentiles, v. 17-22.

1.The rejection of the Jews made room for the reception of the Gentiles. The Jews' leavings were a feast for the poor Gentiles (v. 11): "Have they stumbled that they should fall? Had God no other end in forsaking and rejecting them than their destruction?" He startles at this, rejecting the thought with abhorrence, as usually he does when any thing is suggested which seems to reflect upon the wisdom, or righteousness, or goodness of God: God forbid! no, through their fall salvation is come to the Gentiles. Not but that salvation might have come to the Gentiles if they had stood; but by the divine appointment it was so ordered that the gospel should be preached to the Gentiles upon the Jews' refusal of it. Thus in the parable (Matt. xxii. 8, 9), Those that were first bidden were not worthy—Go ye therefore into the highways, Luke xiv. 21. And so it was in the history (Acts xiii. 46): It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you; but, seeing you put it from you, lo, we turn to the Gentiles; so Acts xviii. 6. God will have a church in the world, will have the wedding furnished with guests; and, if one will not come, another will, or why was the offer made? The Jews had the refusal, and so the tender came to the Gentiles. See how Infinite Wisdom brings light out of darkness, good out of evil, meat out of the eater, and sweetness out of the strong. To the same purport he says (v. 12), The fall of them was the riches of the world, that is, it hastened the gospel so much the sooner into the Gentile world. The gospel is the greatest riches of the place where it is; it is better than thousands of gold and silver. Or, The riches of the Gentiles was the multitude of converts among them. True believers are God's jewels. To the same purport (v. 15): The casting away of them is the reconciling of the world. God's displeasure towards them made way for his favour towards the Gentiles. God was in Christ reconciling the world, 2 Cor. v. 19. And therefore he took occasion from the unbelief of the Jews openly to disavow and disown them, though they had been his peculiar favourites, to show that in dispensing his favours he would now no longer act in such a way of peculiarity and restriction, but that in every nation he that feared God and wrought righteousness should be accepted of him, Acts x. 34, 35.

2.The use that the apostle makes of this doctrine concerning the substitution of the Gentiles in the room of the Jews.

(1.)As a kinsman to the Jews, here is a word of excitement and exhortation to them, to stir them up to receive and embrace the gospel-offer. This God intended in his favour to the Gentiles, to provoke the Jews to jealousy (v. 11), and Paul endeavours to enforce it accordingly (v. 14): If by any means I might provoke to emulation those who are my flesh. "Shall the despised Gentiles run away with all the comforts and privileges of the gospel, and shall not we repent of our refusal, and now at last put in for a share? Shall not we believe and obey, and be pardoned and saved, as well as the Gentiles?" See an instance of such an emulation in Esau, Gen. xxviii. 6-9. There is a commendable emulation in the affairs of our souls: why should not we be as holy and happy as any of our neighbours? In this emulation there needs no suspicion, undermining or countermining; for the church has room enough, and the new covenant grace and comfort enough, for us all. The blessings are not lessened by the multitudes of the sharers.—And might save some of them. See what was Paul's business, to save souls; and yet the utmost he promises himself is but to save some. Though he was such a powerful preacher, spoke and wrote with such evidence and demonstration of the Spirit, yet of the many he dealt with he could but save some. Ministers must think their pains well bestowed if they can but be instrumental to save some.

(2.)As an apostle to the Gentiles, here is a word of caution for them: "I speak to you Gentiles. You believing Romans, you hear what riches of salvation are come to you by the fall of the Jews, but take heed lest you do any thing to forfeit it." Paul takes this, as other occasions, to apply his discourse to the Gentiles, because he was the apostle of the Gentiles, appointed for the service of their faith, to plant and water churches in the Gentile nations. This was the purport of his extraordinary mission, Acts xxii. 21, I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles; compare Acts ix. 15. It was likewise the intention of his ordination, Gal. ii. 9. Compare Acts xiii. 2. It ought to be our great and special care to do good to those that are under our charge: we must particularly mind that which is our own work. It was an instance of God's great love to the poor Gentiles that he appointed Paul, who in gifts and graces excelled all the apostles, to be the apostle of the Gentiles. The Gentile world was a wider province; and the work to be done in it required a very able, skilful, zealous, courageous workman: such a one was Paul. God calls those to special work whom he either sees or makes fit for it.—I magnify my office. There were those that vilified it, and him because of it. It was because he was the apostle of the Gentiles that the Jews were so outrageous against him (Acts xxii. 21, 22), and yet he thought never the worse of it, though it set him up as the butt of all the Jewish rage and malice. It is a sign of true love to Jesus Christ to reckon that service and work for him truly honourable which the world looks upon with scorn, as mean and contemptible. The office of the ministry is an office to be magnified. Ministers are ambassadors for Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God, and for their work's sake are to be esteemed highly in love.—My office; ten diakonian mou—my ministry, my service, not my lordship and dominion. It was not the dignity and power, but the duty and work, of an apostle, that Paul was so much in love with. Now two things he exhorts the Gentiles to, with reference to the rejected Jews:—

[1.]To have a respect for the Jews, notwithstanding, and to desire their conversion. This is intimated in the prospect he gives them of the advantage that would accrue to the church by their conversion, v. 12, 15. It would be as life from the dead; and therefore they must not insult and triumph over those poor Jews, but rather pity them, and desire their welfare, and long for the receiving of them in again.

[2.]To take heed to themselves, lest they should stumble and fall, as they Jews had done, v. 17-22. Here observe,

First, The privilege which the Gentiles had by being taken into the church. They were grafted in (v. 17), as a branch of a wild olive into a good olive, which is contrary to the way and custom of the husbandman, who grafts the good olive into the bad; but those that God grafts into the church he finds wild and barren, and good for nothing. Men graft to mend the tree; but God grafts to mend the branch. 1. The church of God is an olive-tree, flourishing and fruitful as an olive (Ps. lii. 8; Hos. xiv. 6), the fruit useful for the honour both of God and man, Judg. ix. 9. 2. Those that are out of the church are as wild olive-trees, not only useless, but what they do produce is sour and unsavoury: Wild by nature, v. 24. This was the state of the poor Gentiles, that wanted church privileges, and in respect of real sanctification; and it is the natural state of every one of us, to be wild by nature. 3. Conversion is the grafting in of wild branches into the good olive. We must be cut off from the old stock, and be brought into union with a new root. 4. Those that are grafted into the good olive-tree partake of the root and fatness of the olive. It is applicable to a saving union with Christ; all that are by a lively faith grafted into Christ partake of him as the branches of the root—receive from his fulness. But it is here spoken of a visible church-membership, from which the Jews were as branches broken off; and so the Gentiles were grafted in, autois—among those that continued, or in the room of those that were broken off. The Gentiles, being grafted into the church, partake of the same privileges that the Jews did, the root and fatness. The olive-tree is the visible church (called so Jer. xi. 16); the root of this tree was Abraham, not the root of communication, so Christ only is the root, but the root of administration, he being the first with whom the covenant was so solemnly made. Now the believing Gentiles partake of this root: he also is ason of Abraham (Luke xix. 9), the blessing of Abraham comes upon the Gentiles (Gal. iii. 14), the same fatness of the olive-tree, the same for substance, special protection, lively oracles, means of salvation, a standing ministry, instituted ordinances; and, among the rest, the visible church-membership of their infant seed, which was part of the fatness of the olive-tree that the Jews had, and cannot be imagined to be denied to the Gentiles.

Secondly, A caution not to abuse these privileges. 1. "Be not proud (v. 18): Boast not against the branches. Do not therefore trample upon the Jews as a reprobate people, nor insult over those that are broken off, much less over those that do continue." Grace is given, not to make us proud, but to make us thankful. The law of faith excludes all boasting either of ourselves or against others. "Do not say (v. 19): They were broken off that I might be grafted in; that is, do not think that thou didst merit more at the hand of God than they, or didst stand higher in his favour." "But remember, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Though thou art grafted in, thou art still but a branch borne by the root; nay, and an engrafted branch, brought into the good olive contrary to nature (v. 24), not free-born, but by an act of grace enfranchised and naturalized. Abraham, the root of the Jewish church, is not beholden to thee; but thou art greatly obliged to him, as the trustee of the covenant and the father of many nations. Therefore, if thou boast, know (this word must be supplied to clear the sense) thou bearest not the root but the root thee." 2. "Be not secure (v. 20): Be not high-minded, but fear. Be not too confident of your own strength and standing." A holy fear is an excellent preservative against high-mindedness: happy is the man that thus feareth always. We need not fear but God will be true to his word; all the danger is lest we be false to ours. Let us therefore fear, Heb. iv. 1. The church of Rome now boasts of a patent of perpetual preservation; but the apostle here, in his epistle to that church when she was in her infancy and integrity, enters an express caveat against that boast, and all claims of that kind.—Fear what? "Why fear lest thou commit a forfeiture as they have done, lest thou lose the privileges thou now enjoyest, as they have lost theirs." The evils that befal others should be warnings to us. Go (saith God to Jerusalem Jer. vii. 12), and see what I did to Shiloh; so now, let all the churches of God go and see what he did to Jerusalem, and what is become of the day of their visitation, that we may hear and fear, and take heed of Jerusalem's sin. The patent which churches have of their privileges is not for a certain term, nor entailed upon them and their heirs; but it runs as long as they carry themselves well, and no longer. Consider, (1.) "How they were broken off. It was not undeservedly, by an act of absolute sovereignty and prerogative, but because of unbelief." It seems, then, it is possible for churches that have long stood by faith to fall into such a state of infidelity as may be their ruin. Their unbelief did not only provoke God to cut them off, but they did by this cut themselves off; it was not only the meritorious, but the formal cause of their separation. "Now, thou art liable to the same infirmity and corruption that they fell by." Further observe, They were natural branches (v. 21), not only interested in Abraham's covenant, but descending from Abraham's loins, and so born upon the premises, and thence had a kind of tenant-right: yet, when they sunk into unbelief, God did not spare them. Prescription, long usage, the faithfulness of their ancestors, would not secure them. It was in vain to plead, though they insisted much upon it, that they were Abraham's seed, Matt. iii. 9; John viii. 33. It is true they were the husbandmen to whom the vineyard was first let out; but, when they forfeited it, it was justly taken from them, Matt. xxi. 41, 43. This is called here severity, v. 22. God laid righteousness to the line and judgment to the plummet, and dealt with them according to their sins. Severity is a word that sounds harshly; and I do not remember that it is any where else in scripture ascribed to God; and it is here applied to the unchurching of the Jews. God is most severe towards those that have been in profession nearest to him, if they rebel against him, Amos iii. 2. Patience and privileges abused turn to the greatest wrath. Of all judgments, spiritual judgments are the sorest; for of these he is here speaking, v. 8. (2.) "How thou standest, thou that art engrafted in." He speaks to the Gentile churches in general, though perhaps tacitly reflecting on some particular person, who might have expressed some such pride and triumph in the Jews' rejection. "Consider then," [1.] "By what means thou standest: By faith, which is a depending grace, and fetches in strength from heaven. Thou dost not stand in any strength of thy own, of which thou mightest be confident: thou art no more than the free grace of God makes thee, and his grace is his own, which he gives or withholds at pleasure. That which ruined them was unbelief, and by faith thou standest; therefore thou hast no faster hold than they had, thou standest on no firmer foundation than they did." [2.] "On what terms (v. 22): Towards thee goodness, if thou continue in his goodness, that is, continue in a dependence upon and compliance with the free grace of God, the want of which it was that ruined the Jews—if thou be careful to keep up thine interest in the divine favour, by being continually careful to please God and fearful of offending him." The sum of our duty, the condition of our happiness, is to keep ourselves in the love of God. Fear the Lord and his goodness. Hos. iii. 5.

III.Another thing that qualified this doctrine of the Jews' rejection is that, though for the present they are cast off, yet the rejection is not final; but, when the fulness of time is come, they will be taken in again. They are not cast off for ever, but mercy is remembered in the midst of wrath. Let us observe,

1.How this conversion of the Jews is here described.

(1.)It is said to be their fulness (v. 12), that is, the addition of them to the church, the filling up again of that place which became vacant by their rejection. This would be the enriching of the world (that is, the church in the world) with a great deal of light and strength and beauty.

(2.)It is called the receiving of them. The conversion of a soul is the receiving of that soul, so the conversion of a nation. They shall be received into favour, into the church, into the love of Christ, whose arms are stretched out for the receiving of all those that will come to him. And this will be as life from the dead—so strange and surprising, and yet withal so welcome and acceptable. The conversion of the Jews will bring great joy to the church. See Luke xv. 32, He was dead, and is alive; and therefore it was meet we should make merry and be glad.

(3.)It is called the grafting of them in again (v. 23), into the church, from which they had been broken off. That which is grafted in receives sap and virtue from the root; so does a soul that is truly grafted into the church receive life, and strength, and grace from Christ the quickening root. They shall be grafted into their own olive-tree (v. 24); that is, into the church of which they had formerly been the most eminent and conspicuous members, to retrieve those privileges of visible church-membership which they had so long enjoyed, but have now sinned away and forfeited by their unbelief.

(4.)It is called the saving of all Israel, v. 26. True conversion may well be called salvation; it is salvation begun. See Acts ii. 47. The adding of them to the church is the saving of them: tous sozomenous, in the present tense, are saved. When conversion-work goes on, salvation-work goes on.

2.What it is grounded upon, and what reason we have to look for it.

(1.)Because of the holiness of the first-fruits and the root, v. 16. Some by the first-fruits understand those of the Jews that were already converted to the faith of Christ and received into the church, who were as the first-fruits dedicated to God, as earnests of a more plentiful and sanctified harvest. A good beginning promises a good ending. Why may we not suppose that others may be savingly wrought upon as well as those who are already brought in? Others by the first-fruits understand the same with the root, namely, the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, from whom the Jews descended, and with whom, as the prime trustees, the covenant was deposited: and so they were the root of the Jews, not only as a people, but as a church. Now, if they were holy, which is not meant so much of inherent as of federal holiness—if they were in the church and in the covenant—then we have reason to conclude that God hath a kindness for the lump—the body of that people; and for the branches—the particular members of it. The Jews are in a sense a holy nation (Exod. xix. 6), being descended from holy parents. Now it cannot be imagined that such a holy nation should be totally and finally cast off. This proves that the seed of believers, as such, are within the pale of the visible church, and within the verge of the covenant, till they do, by their unbelief, throw themselves out; for, if the root be holy, so are the branches. Though real qualifications are not propagated, yet relative privileges are. Though a wise man does not beget a wise man, yet a free man begets a free man. Though grace does not run in the blood, yet external privileges do (till they are forfeited), even to a thousand generations. Look how they will answer it another day that cut off the entail, by turning the seed of the faithful out of the church, and so not allowing the blessing of Abraham to come upon the Gentiles. The Jewish branches are reckoned holy, because the root was so. This is expressed more plainly (v. 28): They are beloved for the fathers' sakes. In this love to the fathers the first foundation of their church-state was laid (Deut. iv. 37): Because he loved they fathers, therefore he chose their seed after them. And the same love would revive their privileges, for still the ancient loving-kindness is remembered; they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. It is God's usual method of grace. Kindness to the children for the father's sake is therefore called the kindness of God, 2 Sam. ix. 3, 7. Though, as concerning the gospel (namely, in the present dispensation of it), they are enemies to it for your sakes, that is, for the sake of the Gentiles, against whom they have such an antipathy; yet, when God's time shall come, this will wear off, and God's love to their fathers will be remembered. See a promise that points at this, Lev. xxvi. 42. The iniquity of the fathers is visited but to the third and fourth generation; but there is mercy kept for thousands. Many fare the better for the sake of their godly ancestors. It is upon this account that the church is called their own olive-tree. Long it had been their own peculiar, which is some encouragement to us to hope that there may be room for them in it again, for old acquaintance-sake. That which hath been may be again. Though particular persons and generations wear off in unbelief, yet there having been a national church-membership, though for the present suspended, we may expect that it will be revived.

(2.)Because of the power of God (v. 23): God is able to graft them in again. The conversion of souls is a work of almighty power; and when they seem most hardened, and blinded, and obstinate, our comfort is that God is able to work a change, able to graft those in that have been long cast out and withered. When the house is kept by the strong man armed, with all his force, yet God is stronger than he, and is able to dispossess him. The condition of their restoration is faith: If they abide not still in unbelief. So that nothing is to be done but to remove that unbelief that is the great obstacle; and God is able to take that away, though nothing less than an almighty power will do it, the same power that raised up Christ from the dead, Eph. i. 19, 29. Otherwise, can these dry bones live?

(3.)Because of the grace of God manifested to the Gentiles. Those that have themselves experienced the grace of God, preventing, distinguishing grace, may thence take encouragement to hope well concerning others. This is his argument (v. 24): "If thou wast grafted into a good olive, that was wild by nature, much more shall these that were the natural branches, and may therefore be presumed somewhat nearer to the divine acceptance." This is a suggestion very proper to check the insolence of those Gentile Christians that looked with disdain and triumph upon the condition of the rejected Jews, and trampled upon them; as if he had said, "Their condition, bad as it is, is not so bad as yours was before your conversion; and therefore why may it not be made as good as yours is?" This is his argument (v. 30, 31): As you in times past have not, &c. It is good for those that have found mercy with God to be often thinking what they were in time past, and how they obtained that mercy. This would help to soften our censures of those that still continue in unbelief, and quicken our prayers for them. He argues further from the occasion of the Gentiles' call, that is, the unbelief of the Jews; thence it took rise: "You have obtained mercy through their unbelief; much more shall they obtain mercy through your mercy. If the putting out of their candle was the lighting of yours, by that power of God which brings good out of evil, much more shall the continued light of your candle, when God's time shall come, be a means of lighting theirs again." "That through your mercy they might obtain mercy, that is, that they may be beholden to you, as you have been to them." He takes it for granted that the believing Gentiles would do their utmost endeavour to work upon the Jews—that, when God had persuaded Japhet, Japhet would be labouring to persuade Shem. True grace hates monopolies. Those that have found mercy themselves should endeavour that through their mercy others also may obtain mercy.

(4.)Because of the promises and prophecies of the Old Testament, which point at this. He quotes a very remarkable one, v. 26, from Isa. lix. 20, 21. Where we may observe,

[1.]The coming of Christ promised: There shall come out of Zion the deliverer. Jesus Christ is the great deliverer, which supposes mankind in a state of misery and danger. In Isaiah it is, the Redeemer shall come to Zion. There he is called the Redeemer; here the deliverer; he delivers in a way of redemption, by a price. There he is said to come to Zion, because when the prophet prophesied he was yet to come into the world, and Zion was his first head-quarters. Thither he came, there he took up his residence: but, when the apostle wrote this, he had come, he had been in Zion; and he is speaking of the fruits of his appearing, which shall come out of Zion; thence, as from the spring, issued forth those streams of living water which in the everlasting gospel watered the nations. Out of Zion went forth the law, Isa. ii. 3. Compare Luke xxiv. 47.

[2.]The end and purpose of this coming: He shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. Christ's errand into the world was to turn away ungodliness, to turn away the guilt by the purchase of pardoning mercy, and to turn away the power by the pouring out of renewing grace, to save his people from their sins (Matt. i. 21), to separate between us and our sins, that iniquity might not be our ruin, and that it might not be our ruler. Especially to turn it away from Jacob, which is that for the sake of which he quotes the text, as a proof of the great kindness God intended for the seed of Jacob. What greater kindness could he do them than to turn away ungodliness from them, to take away that which comes between them and all happiness, take away sin, and then make way for all good? This is the blessing that Christ was sent to bestow upon the world, and to tender it to the Jews in the first place (Acts iii. 26), to turn people from their iniquities. In Isaiah it is, The Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto those that turn from transgression in Jacob, which shown who in Zion were to have a share in and to reap benefit by the deliverance promised, those and those only that leave their sins and turn to God; to them Christ comes as a Redeemer, but as an avenger to those that persist in impenitence. See Deut. xxx. 2, 3. Those that turn from sin will be owned as the true citizens of Zion (Eph. ii. 19), the right Jacob, Ps. xxiv. 4, 6. Putting both these readings together, we learn that none have an interest in Christ but those that turn from their sins, nor can any turn from their sins but by the strength of the grace of Christ.—For this is my covenant with them—this, that the deliverer shall come to them—this, that my Spirit shall not depart from them, as it follows, Isa. lix. 21. God's gracious intentions concerning Israel were made the matter of a covenant, which the God that cannot lie could not but be true and faithful to. They were the children of the covenant, Acts iii. 25. The apostle adds, When I shall take away their sins, which some think refers to Isa. xxvii. 9, or only to the foregoing words, to turn away ungodliness. Pardon of sin is laid as the foundation of all the blessings of the new covenant (Heb. viii. 12): For I will be merciful. Now from all this he infers that certainly God had great mercy in store for that people, something answerable to the extent of these rich promises: and he proves his inference (v. 29) by this truth: For the gifts and callings of God are without repentance. Repentance is sometimes taken for a change of mind, and so God never repents, for he is in one mind and who can turn him? Sometimes for a change of way, and that is here understood, intimating the constancy and unchangeableness of that love of God which is founded in election. Those gifts and callings are immutable; whom he so loves, he loves to the end. We find God repenting that he had given man a being (Gen. vi. 6, It repented the Lord that he had made man), and repenting that he had given a man honour and power (1 Sam. xv. 11, It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king); but we never find God repenting that he had given a man grace, or effectually called him; those gifts and callings are without repentance.

Historical interpretation

Historical reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 384–430
Post-Nicene
400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 384AmbrosiasterPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES.”
This is what the Savior says: “Father, I have kept those whom thou didst give to me, and none of them is lost but the son of perdition.”
d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Romans 18
"He hath not cast off His people, whom He foreknew."

As though he said, I have with me three, five, or ten thousand. What then? has the people come to be three, five, or ten thousand? that seed that compared with the stars of heaven for multitude, or the sand of the sea? Is this the way you deceive us and put a cheat upon us, by making the whole people thyself and the few that are with thee; and didst thou inflate us with idle hopes, and say that the promise has been fulfilled, when all are lost, and the salvation comes down to a few? This is all bombast and vanity! we cannot away with such sophistry as this. Now, that they may not say this, see how in the sequel he proceeds to the answer, not giving the objection indeed, but before it grounding the answer to it upon ancient history. What then is the answer?

"Wot ye not," he says, "what the Scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying, Lord, they have killed Thy prophets, and digged down Thine altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life. But what saith the answer of God unto him? I have reserved to Myself seven thousand men, who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. Even so then at this present time also, there is a remnant according to the election of grace."

What he means is nearly this. "God hath not cast off His people." For had He done so, He would have admitted none of them. But if He did admit some, He hath not cast them off. Still it is said, if He had not cast off, He would have admitted all. This does not follow; since in Elijah's time the part to be saved had come down to "seven thousand:" and now also there are probably many that believe. But if you do not know who they are, this is no wonder, for that prophet, who was so great and good a man, did not know. But God ordered things for Himself when even the prophet knew them not. But consider his judgment. Now in proving what was before him, he covertly augments the charge against them. For this is why he gave the whole passage, that he might parade before them their untowardness, and show that they had been so from of old. For if he had not wished this, but had directed his whole attention to prove that the people lay in the few, he would have said that even in Elijah's time, seven thousand were left. But now he reads to them the passage further back, as having been throughout at pains to show that it was no strange thing that they did with Christ, and the Apostles, but their habitual practice. For to prevent their saying that it was as a deceiver we put Christ to death, and as impostors that we persecute the Apostles, he brings forward the text which says, "Lord, they have killed Thy prophets, and digged down thine altars." Then in order not to make his discourse galling to them, he attaches another reason to the bringing forward of the text. For he quotes it not as if it was on purpose to accuse them, but as if intent upon showing some other things. And he leaves them without any excuse even by what had before been done.
d. AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourcePELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
God has not rejected those whom he knew in advance would believe. Paul eliminates any occasion for pride among the Gentiles, in case they become boastful because so few of the Jews believed.
d. AD 430Augustine of HippoPost-NiceneSourceGIFT OF PERSEVERANCE 17.47
Predestination is sometimes designated by the name of foreknowledge, as here, where “he foreknew” can only mean “he predestined,” as the context of what follows demonstrates.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Romans 11:2 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8