Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89
We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,
I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.
II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.
1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.
2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.
3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.
4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.
5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.
7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!
8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.
Continue studying Numbers 7:65 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 7:65 meticulously concludes the detailed account of the peace offerings presented by Abidan the son of Gideoni, the leader of the tribe of Benjamin, during the momentous dedication of the newly consecrated Tabernacle. This verse specifically enumerates the substantial animal contributions—two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs of the first year—designated for the peace offerings, underscoring the profound generosity, spiritual devotion, and communal significance inherent in the worship practices of ancient Israel.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Numbers 7:65, within its broader context, employs several significant literary devices. Enumeration or Cataloging is prominent, as the verse precisely lists the specific animals for the peace offering. This meticulous detailing, repeated for each tribal leader throughout Numbers 7, emphasizes the divine order, precision, and thoroughness required in Israelite worship. The Repetition of identical offerings from each tribal leader across the chapter reinforces the overarching theme of unity and collective devotion, demonstrating that despite tribal distinctions, all Israel participated equally in consecrating the Tabernacle. Furthermore, the animals themselves, particularly the "lambs of the first year," carry rich Symbolism of purity, innocence, and unblemished sacrifice, essential for approaching a holy God. The entire act of offering the peace sacrifice is deeply Symbolic of the desired state of shalom—wholeness, peace, and harmonious communion—between God and His people, a state celebrated and affirmed through the shared meal.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 7:65, through its focus on the peace offering, profoundly illustrates the Israelite understanding of communion with God. These offerings were not merely transactional but deeply relational, designed to foster and celebrate a state of shalom—wholeness, peace, and well-being—between the worshiper and Yahweh, and within the community. The shared meal aspect of the peace offering underscored the intimacy and fellowship that God desired with His people, a relationship characterized by gratitude, reconciliation, and joyous celebration. This ancient practice, a tangible expression of a covenant relationship, foreshadows the ultimate peace and reconciliation offered through Christ, who perfectly embodies and provides true shalom for all who believe.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The meticulous generosity of Abidan's offering for the Tabernacle's dedication, particularly the substantial peace offerings, provides a timeless model for our own approach to worship and spiritual life. It challenges us to consider the quality and quantity of our "offerings" to God—not just financially, but also our time, talents, and heartfelt devotion. Just as the peace offering fostered communion and celebrated shalom between God and His people, so too should our spiritual practices and communal gatherings aim to deepen our fellowship with God and with one another. We are called to pursue holistic well-being, a state of shalom in all aspects of our lives, recognizing that true peace is found in a right relationship with our Creator and within the community of faith. This ancient ritual reminds us that worship is not merely an obligation but a joyous opportunity to draw near to God and celebrate His presence among us, reflecting a heart of gratitude and a desire for harmonious relationship.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the significance of the "peace offering" in ancient Israelite worship?
Answer: The peace offering (zevahim sh'lamim) was one of the primary categories of sacrifice in ancient Israel, distinct from burnt offerings or sin offerings. Its significance lay primarily in fostering and celebrating a state of shalom—wholeness, peace, and well-being—between the offerer and God, and within the community. It was typically offered as an expression of thanksgiving, the fulfillment of a vow, or a freewill offering. A unique characteristic was that after portions were given to God (fat, kidneys) and the priests (breast, right thigh), the remainder of the animal was returned to the offerer to be consumed in a celebratory communal meal with family and friends. This shared meal symbolized fellowship, reconciliation, and joyous communion in the presence of God, emphasizing the relational aspect of Israelite worship. The laws governing these offerings are detailed in Leviticus 3.
Why were the offerings from each tribal leader, including Abidan's, so similar and extensive?
Answer: The meticulous record in Numbers 7, detailing identical offerings from each of the twelve tribal leaders, underscores several key points. First, it emphasized the unity and solidarity of the Israelite tribes in their collective devotion to God and the Tabernacle. Despite their distinct tribal identities, they were united in their worship and purpose. Second, the uniformity reflected the divine order and precision required in sacred service; God's instructions were to be followed exactly, demonstrating obedience and reverence. Third, the sheer extensiveness of the offerings, as seen in Abidan's contribution of multiple animals for peace offerings alone, highlighted the immense value placed on the Tabernacle's dedication and the generosity expected in approaching God. It symbolized the giving of their best, reflecting the abundance of God's provision and the people's grateful response.
Who was Abidan the son of Gideoni, and what was his role?
Answer: Abidan the son of Gideoni was the designated leader (nasi') of the tribe of Benjamin during the wilderness wanderings. His name appears in the tribal census in Numbers 1:11 and again in Numbers 2:22, where he is listed as the leader of the Benjaminite camp. As a tribal leader, Abidan held a significant position of authority and representation, responsible for the welfare and spiritual guidance of his tribe. In Numbers 7, his role was to present the offerings on behalf of the tribe of Benjamin for the dedication of the Tabernacle, demonstrating his leadership in spiritual matters and his responsibility to lead his people in worship and obedience to God's commands. His participation underscored the organized and hierarchical structure of Israelite society at that time.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The peace offering of Numbers 7:65, with its emphasis on shalom and communion, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The ancient ritual, which allowed for a shared meal symbolizing reconciliation and fellowship with God, was a shadow of the profound peace that Christ's sacrifice would achieve. He is our true and final "peace offering," for through His atoning work on the cross, He has reconciled us to God, breaking down the wall of hostility that separated humanity from its Creator (as beautifully articulated in Ephesians 2:14). The peace that the Old Testament worshiper sought to establish through the shelamim is now freely and fully granted to all who believe in Christ, who is our peace (Romans 5:1). His single, perfect offering has forever sanctified those who are made holy, making repeated sacrifices unnecessary (Hebrews 10:10). Furthermore, the communal meal aspect of the peace offering is powerfully echoed in the New Covenant through the Lord's Supper, where believers partake in a meal that symbolizes their ongoing fellowship with Christ and with one another, celebrating the peace and communion secured by His body and blood. Through Him, we now have true fellowship with the Father and with His Son, Jesus Christ (1 John 1:3), a fellowship that surpasses anything achieved through the Old Testament sacrifices.