Numbers 30:15

Translation
King James Version
But if he shall any ways make them void after that he hath heard them; then he shall bear her iniquity.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But if he shall any ways H6565 make them void H6565 after H310 that he hath heard H8085 them; then he shall bear H5375 her iniquity H5771.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
If he makes them null and void after he has heard them, then he will bear the consequent guilt."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But if he nullifies them after he hears of them, then he will bear her iniquity.”
Ask
American Standard Version
But if he shall make them null and void after that he hath heard them, then he shall bear her iniquity.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But if he shall make them null and void after that he has heard them, then he shall bear her iniquity.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But if her husband holde his peace concerning her from day to day, then he stablisheth al her vowes and all her bondes which shee hath made: hee hath confirmed them because he held his peace concerning her the same day that hee hearde them.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and if he doth at all break them after his hearing, then he hath borne her iniquity.'
Ask
See also
Leviticus 5:1Galatians 3:28Numbers 30:12Numbers 30:8Numbers 30:5
In the KJVVerse 4,664 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 30:15 is a pivotal legal provision within the Mosaic Law concerning the sanctity of vows, specifically addressing the scenario of a husband's authority over his wife's commitments. This verse stipulates that if a husband, having heard his wife's vow, initially allows it to stand—either through explicit affirmation or by remaining silent—but then subsequently attempts to annul it, he himself will bear the iniquity or guilt for this breach of integrity. It underscores the profound seriousness with which God regards promises made in His name and highlights the personal accountability of those in positions of authority for their consistency and faithfulness.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers chapter 30 is a meticulously detailed legal exposition dedicated entirely to the intricate laws governing vows and oaths within ancient Israelite society. The chapter begins by establishing the foundational principle that any vow made to the Lord is absolutely binding and must be fulfilled (Numbers 30:2). The subsequent verses systematically delineate the conditions under which vows made by various categories of individuals—men, single women, widows, divorced women, and married women—could be confirmed or annulled. For a married woman, her husband's authority was paramount. If he heard her vow and immediately expressed disapproval on the same day, he could invalidate it, and she would be forgiven (Numbers 30:8). Conversely, if he remained silent and did not object, the vow was considered confirmed and fully binding upon her (Numbers 30:11). Numbers 30:15 serves as the culminating and most severe provision regarding married women's vows, specifically addressing the husband's culpability if his initial inaction or affirmation is later contradicted by an attempt to annul the vow. In such a case, the "iniquity" or spiritual consequence for the broken vow is transferred from the wife to the husband, emphasizing the divine seriousness of consistency and integrity in leadership.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israel was a patriarchal society, where women, though highly valued within the family and community, were generally under the legal and social authority of their fathers before marriage and their husbands afterward. Vows (Hebrew: nedarim) were solemn, voluntary promises made directly to God, often involving a dedication of resources, a period of abstinence (such as the Nazirite vow described in Numbers 6), or a specific action. Such vows were considered extremely serious and binding, reflecting a deep reverence for God's holiness and the integrity of one's word before Him. Breaking a vow was not merely a social faux pas but a direct offense against God, incurring spiritual consequences. This legal framework in Numbers 30 ensured that while women could make vows, their commitments would not inadvertently create conflict within the household or undermine the husband's headship. Simultaneously, it protected the sanctity of the vow itself by holding the husband accountable for his consistency and integrity, preventing arbitrary or self-serving annulments after initial consent.
  • Key Themes: Numbers 30:15 contributes significantly to several overarching themes found throughout the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. Firstly, it profoundly underscores the Sanctity of Vows and Oaths, emphasizing that promises made to God are not to be taken lightly and carry divine weight. This aligns with broader biblical principles found in passages like Deuteronomy 23:21-23, which admonish prompt and faithful fulfillment of vows. Secondly, the verse highlights Responsibility and Accountability, particularly for those in positions of authority. The husband's actions (or inactions) have direct spiritual consequences, not only for his wife but for himself. His initial decision to allow the vow to stand places the burden of its fulfillment, or the guilt of its annulment, squarely on his shoulders. Thirdly, it speaks to the crucial importance of Integrity and Consistency. The husband's attempt to "make them void" after having implicitly or explicitly validated the vow demonstrates a profound lack of consistency, which is deemed a serious offense in the eyes of God, leading him to "bear her iniquity." This principle extends to the broader call for God's people to live with unwavering integrity in all their dealings, especially those involving spiritual commitments and leadership.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Make them void (Hebrew, pârar', H6565): Derived from the primitive root H6565 (pârar), this verb means "to break up," "to violate," "to frustrate," or "to annul." In the context of Numbers 30:15, it refers to the husband's act of attempting to invalidate or render ineffective a vow that he had previously allowed to stand, either by explicit affirmation or through his silence. This action signifies a reversal of his prior implicit or explicit consent, an act that undermines the sacred nature of the vow and his own integrity before God.
  • Bear her iniquity (Hebrew, _nâsâʼ _ʻâvôn'__, H5375): This significant theological phrase combines H5375 (nâsâʼ), meaning "to lift," "to carry," or "to bear," with H5771 (ʻâvôn), meaning "perversity," "moral evil," "fault," "iniquity," or "sin." Together, "bear iniquity" implies taking on the responsibility, guilt, or penalty for an offense. In this verse, if the husband attempts to void a previously confirmed vow, he incurs the divine displeasure, guilt, or punishment that would otherwise have fallen upon his wife had she broken a valid vow. It signifies that the spiritual burden and accountability for the broken vow are transferred from the wife to the husband due to his inconsistent and presumptuous action. This concept appears frequently in the Old Testament, often referring to the consequences of sin or the means of atonement.

Verse Breakdown

  • "But if he shall any ways make them void": This clause introduces the conditional scenario, highlighting a specific transgression. It describes the husband's action of attempting to annul or invalidate his wife's vows. The phrase "any ways" emphasizes that any method or attempt to void the vow, once it has been established as binding, is considered a transgression in God's eyes.
  • "after that he hath heard [them];": This specifies the crucial timing that defines the husband's culpability. The husband's attempt to void the vow occurs after he has already heard it and, either by his silence or explicit consent, allowed it to stand. This temporal distinction is critical, as it highlights the inconsistency and lack of integrity in his subsequent action, given that his initial inaction or approval had already rendered the vow binding.
  • "then he shall bear her iniquity.": This is the direct and unavoidable consequence clause. As a result of his inconsistent and presumptuous attempt to void a confirmed vow, the husband becomes personally accountable for the spiritual guilt and consequences. The "iniquity" that would have fallen upon his wife for breaking a valid vow is now transferred to him, signifying divine judgment for his disregard of sacred commitments and his own lack of integrity.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Numbers 30:15 is Legal Formulation, specifically a Conditional Clause or Casuistic Law. The verse is meticulously structured as an "if...then" statement, a common characteristic of ancient Near Eastern legal codes. This precise structure clearly delineates a specific scenario (the husband attempting to void a confirmed vow after initial consent) and its direct, unavoidable consequence (he shall bear her iniquity). This precise legal language leaves no ambiguity regarding the divine judgment on such an action. Furthermore, the concept of "bearing iniquity" functions as a powerful form of Symbolism for divine judgment and accountability, representing the spiritual burden and consequences of sin. The transfer of this "iniquity" from the wife to the husband underscores the principle of Vicarious Accountability in this specific legal context, where the husband's actions directly impact the spiritual standing of his household.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 30:15 powerfully reinforces the biblical understanding of God as one who takes human words, especially vows and oaths, with utmost seriousness. It reveals a God who values integrity, consistency, and accountability, particularly from those in positions of authority. The transfer of "iniquity" to the husband underscores that God's justice is precise; He holds individuals responsible for their actions and decisions, especially when those decisions impact sacred commitments. This principle extends beyond the specific context of vows, speaking to the broader truth that our words and commitments, once given, carry spiritual weight before the Lord. It also subtly highlights God's protective nature over those who seek to honor Him, even within a patriarchal system, by ensuring that the sanctity of a vow is upheld and accountability is justly assigned, preventing arbitrary annulment and upholding divine order.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific cultural context of patriarchal authority and formal vows has evolved, the timeless principles embedded in Numbers 30:15 remain profoundly relevant for contemporary believers. This verse calls us to a radical integrity in our words and commitments, reminding us that God hears and takes seriously every promise we make, whether explicitly to Him or implicitly in our daily lives. It challenges those in positions of leadership—in families, churches, or workplaces—to exercise their authority with unwavering consistency and responsibility, recognizing that their decisions and even their silence can have profound spiritual and practical consequences for those under their care. The warning against inconsistency serves as a powerful reminder that our "yes" should be "yes" and our "no" should be "no," reflecting the character of a faithful God. Ultimately, this passage fosters a deeper reverence for God's holiness and a commitment to living lives marked by truthfulness and accountability in all our dealings, understanding that our words are not mere trifles but carry weight in God's economy.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life do I need to cultivate greater integrity and consistency between my words and my actions?
  • How does this passage inform my understanding of responsibility, especially if I am in a position of authority over others in my family, church, or community?
  • What promises or commitments have I made, perhaps informally, that I need to re-evaluate and ensure I am honoring before God?
  • How does the concept of "bearing iniquity" deepen my appreciation for the seriousness with which God views our faithfulness and the profound cost of unfaithfulness?

FAQ

Does this verse imply that women are not fully responsible for their vows?

Answer: No, this verse does not imply that women are not responsible for their vows. Rather, it operates within the specific legal and social framework of ancient Israel where a woman was generally under the authority of her father before marriage and her husband afterward. The primary purpose of this law was to prevent a woman's vow from creating a conflict within the household or undermining the husband's headship. If a husband heard his wife's vow and did not annul it on the same day, it became fully binding upon her (Numbers 30:11). Numbers 30:15 specifically addresses the husband's accountability if he later attempts to void a vow he had previously allowed to stand. It highlights the husband's responsibility for his consistency and integrity, ensuring that the sanctity of the vow itself is upheld, and that he bears the consequence of his own vacillation, not that the wife is inherently less responsible for her initial commitment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 30:15, with its emphasis on bearing iniquity and the sanctity of vows, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The legal principle of one bearing the iniquity of another, or the consequences of a broken covenant, points directly to the atoning work of Christ. While the husband in Numbers 30:15 bears the iniquity for his own inconsistency and disregard for a sacred vow, Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God, bore the iniquity of humanity—our collective sin and failure to keep God's perfect law and covenant promises. As the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, He became our substitute, taking upon Himself the divine judgment we deserved (Isaiah 53:5-6). Furthermore, Christ perfectly fulfilled every vow and every righteous requirement of the law, demonstrating ultimate integrity and unwavering faithfulness to the Father's will, even to the point of death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). Through His sinless life and sacrificial death, we are freed from the burden of our own iniquity and brought into a new covenant relationship, sealed not by our imperfect vows, but by His perfect, unwavering faithfulness and the shedding of His blood (Hebrews 9:15).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 30 verses 3–16

It is here taken for granted that all such persons as are sui juris - at their own disposal, and are likewise of sound understanding and memory, are bound to perform whatever they vow that is lawful and possible; but, if the person vowing be under the dominion and at the disposal of another, the case is different. Two cases much alike are here put and determined: -

I. The case of a daughter in her father's house: and some think, probably enough, that it extends to a son likewise, while he is at home with his father, and under tutors and governors. Whether the exception may thus be stretched I cannot say. Non est distinguendum, ubi lex non distinguit - We are not allowed to make distinctions which the law does not. The rule is general, If a man vow, he must pay. But for a daughter it is express: her vow is nugatory or in suspense till her father knows it, and (it is supposed) knows it from her; for, when it comes to his knowledge, it is in his power either to ratify or nullify it. But in favour of the vow, 1. Even his silence shall suffice to ratify it: If he hold his peace, her vows shall stand, Num 30:4. Qui tacet, consentire videtur - Silence gives consent. Hereby he allows his daughter the liberty she has assumed, and, as long as he says nothing against her vow, she shall be bound by it. But, 2. His protestation against it shall perfectly disannul it, because it is possible that such vow may by prejudicial to the affairs of the family, break the father's measures, perplex the provision made for his table if the vow related to meats, or lessen the provision made for his children if the vow would be more expensive than his estate would bear; however, it was certain that it was an infringement of his authority over his child, and therefore, if he disallow it, she is discharged, and the Lord shall forgive her, that is, she shall not be charged with the guilt of violating her vow; she showed her good-will in making the vow, and, if her intentions therein were sincere, she shall be accounted better than sacrifice. This shows how great a deference children owe to their parents, and how much they ought to honour them and be obedient to them. It is for the interest of the public that the paternal authority be supported; for, when children are countenanced in their disobedience to their parents (as they were by the tradition of the elders, Mat 15:5, Mat 15:6), they soon become in other things children of Belial. If this law be not to be extended to children's marrying without their parents' consent so far as to put it in parents' power to annul the marriage and dissolve the obligation (as some have thought it does), yet certainly it proves the sinfulness of it, and obliges the children that have thus done foolishly to repent and humble themselves before God and their parents.

II. The case of a wife is much the same. As for a woman that is a widow or divorced, she has neither father nor husband to control her, so that, whatever vows she binds her soul with, they shall stand against her (Num 30:9), it is at her peril if she run back; but a wife, who has nothing that she can strictly call her own, but with her husband's allowance, cannot, without that, make any such vow. 1. The law is plain in case of a wife that continues so long after the vow. If her husband allow her vow, though only by silence, it must stand, Num 30:6, Num 30:7. If he disallow it, since her obligation to that which she had vowed arose purely from her own act, and not from any prior command of God, her obligation to her husband shall take place of it, for to him she ought to be in subjection as unto the Lord; and now it is so far from being her duty to fulfil her vow that it would be her sin to disobey her husband, whose consent perhaps she ought to have asked before she made the vow; therefore she needs forgiveness, Num 30:8. 2. The law is the same in case of a wife that soon after becomes a widow, or is put away. Though, if she return to her father's house, she does not therefore so come again under his authority as that he has power to disannul hew vows (Num 30:9), yet if the vow was made while she was in the house of her husband, and her husband disallowed it, it was made void and of no effect for ever, and she does not return under the law of her vow when she is loosed from the law of her husband. This seems to be the distinct meaning of Num 30:10-14, which otherwise would be but a repetition of Num 30:6-8. But it is added (Num 30:15) that, if the husband make void the vows of his wife, he shall bear her iniquity; that is, if the thing she had vowed was really good, for the honour of God and the prosperity of her own soul, and the husband disallowed it out of covetousness, or humour, or to show his authority, though she be discharged from the obligation of her vow, yet he will have a great deal to answer for. Now here it is very observable how carefully the divine law consults the good order of families, and preserves the power of superior relations, and the duty and reverence of inferiors. It is fit that every man should bear rule in his own house, and have his wife and children in subjection with all gravity; and rather than this great rule should be broken, or any encouragement given to inferior relations to break those bonds asunder, God himself would quit his right, and release the obligations even of a solemn vow; so much does religion strengthen the ties of all relations, and secure the welfare of all societiesd, that in it the families of the earth are blessed.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 3–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 30:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.