Skip to content

Matthew 27:32

“The Crucifixion of Jesus”Matthew 27:32–49

King James Version
And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G1161 as they came out G1831, they found G2147 a man G444 of Cyrene G2956, Simon G4613 by name G3686: him G5126 they compelled G29 to G2443 bear G142 his G846 cross G4716.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Along the way they found a man from Cyrene, named Simon, and they forced him to carry the cross of Jesus.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to go with them, that he might bear his cross.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
As they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name, and they compelled him to go with them, that he might carry his cross.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, named Simon: him they compelled to beare his crosse.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And coming forth, they found a man, a Cyrenian, by name Simon: him they impressed that he might bear his cross;

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
14 Greek words
  1. ἘξερχόμενοιExerchomenoiGoing forthG1831V-PNP-NPMVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
  2. δὲdenowG1161CONJConjunction
  3. εὗρονheuronthey foundG2147V-2AAI-3PVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  4. ἄνθρωπονanthrōpona manG444N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  5. ΚυρηναῖονKurēnaionof CyreneG2956N-ASM-LGNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Location Gentilic
  6. ὀνόματιonomatinamedG3686N-DSNNoun Dative Singular Neuter
  7. Σίμωνα·SimōnaSimonG4613N-ASM-PNoun Accusative Singular Masculine Individual
  8. τοῦτονtoutonHimG3778D-ASMDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  9. ἠγγάρευσανēngareusanthey compelledG29V-AAI-3PVerb Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  10. ἵναinathatG2443CONJConjunction
  11. ἄρῃarēhe may carryG142V-AAS-3SVerb Aorist Active Subjunctive 3rd Singular
  12. τὸνtontheG3588T-ASMDefinite article Accusative Singular Masculine
  13. σταυρὸνstauroncrossG4716N-ASMNoun Accusative Singular Masculine
  14. αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 27:32-43
Matthew 27:32-43 View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,162 of 31,102 · 77.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

As Jesus is led out of Jerusalem, the soldiers press a passer-by, Simon of Cyrene, into carrying his cross, because Jesus is too weak after the scourging to carry it further.

“And as they came out,”

Out of the governor’s hall and out of the city, to the public road and the place of execution.

“they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name:”

The soldiers took the first able man at hand. Simon is named, which fits a man the first believers knew.

“him they compelled to bear his cross.”

“His” is Jesus’ cross. Simon was conscripted by Roman authority (angareúō) to carry it.

Passage studyMatthew 27:32–49

The King of the Jews Crucified at Golgotha

Summary

When the soldiers lead Jesus out of Jerusalem, they press a man from Cyrene named Simon into carrying his cross. At Golgotha, the place of a skull, Jesus tastes a drink of vinegar mingled with gall and refuses it, and the soldiers crucify him, share out his clothes by lot and sit down to guard him. Over his head they fix the charge, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS, and on either side of him they crucify a thief. Passers-by, the chief priests with the scribes and elders, and even the thieves mock him and dare him to save himself and come down. From the sixth hour to the ninth, darkness covers the land, and then Jesus cries out the first words of Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Some who hear think he is calling for Elijah. Through all of it Scripture is being fulfilled, and the One they mock for staying on the cross stays there to save others.

Simon of Cyrene Carries the Cross

Before this, Pilate had washed his hands and handed Jesus over to be scourged (Matthew 27:24–26), and the soldiers had mocked him as King of the Jews with a robe, a crown of thorns and a reed (Matthew 27:27–31). “As they came out” is the procession leaving the city for the place of execution. A condemned man usually carried the crossbeam of his own cross, the patibulum, and John tells us that Jesus went out “bearing his cross” (John 19:17). Matthew, Mark and Luke all record that the soldiers then laid it on another man, and the plain reason is that Jesus, after the scourging, was too weak to carry it further. The Son of God was truly man, and his body failed under the load.

The man was Simon, from Cyrene, a city in North Africa in what is now Libya, with a large Jewish community. He was most likely a Jewish pilgrim who had come to Jerusalem for the Passover, an outsider who happened to be on the road that morning. Mark adds that he was the father of Alexander and Rufus (Mark 15:21).

The word “compelled” is angareúō, a word borrowed from Persian. It first meant to serve as a royal courier and came to mean pressing someone into public service, and Roman authority used it to seize men and goods as it needed them. Simon was conscripted on the spot. Jesus used the same verb in the Sermon on the Mount, when he told his disciples that if anyone compels them to go a mile, they should go with him two (Matthew 5:41). “To bear” is aírō, to lift up, take up or carry away, the verb behind John the Baptist’s words, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). The cross, staurós, is a stake or post set upright, the Roman instrument of execution, and the word later stands for Christ’s death itself.

Simon’s walk is a living picture of what Jesus had asked of every disciple: “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me” (Matthew 16:24). Simon took up the cross because he was forced to, and yet he walked behind Jesus with it on his shoulders. Sharing another’s load is the life Paul describes when he writes, “Bear ye one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6:2). Simon carried the wood for a short distance. Jesus carried the weight of our sin, for “the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:3–6), and God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Did Simon become a follower of Jesus?

Mark names Simon’s sons as men his readers already knew, which strongly suggests that Simon and his family came to follow Christ. Scripture is silent about his faith before that day, and he began as an unwilling helper. The man who was made to carry the cross may well have been brought by it to the Saviour who died on it.

Golgotha, the Place of a Skull

“When they were come” uses érchomai, the everyday verb for coming or going, and it marks the end of the walk. The place is Golgothâ, a word of Aramaic origin (the “Chaldee” of the old lexicons) meaning “the skull”, the name of a knoll near Jerusalem. Matthew translates it for his Greek-speaking readers as “a place of a skull”, using kraníon, the word behind our “cranium”. The name Calvary comes from the Latin Calvaria, “skull”, which Jerome’s Latin Bible, the Vulgate, used for kraníon, and the KJV itself says Calvary in Luke’s account (Luke 23:33). Golgotha and Calvary are two names for one place.

Scripture leaves the reason for the name unstated. It may have come from the shape of the rocky hill, from its use as a place of execution, or from an old tradition that Adam’s skull lay there. Whichever it was, the name speaks of death, and it was there that Christ died to destroy death. Mark and John name the place as well (Mark 15:22, John 19:17). Our salvation was won at a real place, on a real day, before many witnesses.

Why was Jesus crucified outside the city?

Both the Law and Roman practice took executions outside the city. The Law commanded Israel to bring the blasphemer “without the camp” to be stoned (Leviticus 24:14), and Rome crucified men outside city walls, where the most people would pass and see. The Law also commanded that the bodies of the sin offerings of the Day of Atonement be carried outside the camp and burned (Leviticus 16:27). Hebrews draws the line from that offering to Golgotha: “Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate” (Hebrews 13:11–12). Being led out also showed that the city’s rulers had cast him out, even as he became the sin offering for his people.

The Drink Jesus Tasted and Refused

At Golgotha, before he was nailed to the cross, Jesus was given “vinegar to drink mingled with gall”. The vinegar, óxos, was sour wine, the cheap everyday drink of soldiers and labourers. Gall, cholḗ, is bile, and the word is used for bitter things. Mark describes the same drink as “wine mingled with myrrh” (Mark 15:23). It was a custom to offer a man about to be crucified a drink mixed with something bitter or numbing, and its purpose was most likely to dull the pain. Matthew’s wording matches the psalm of the righteous sufferer: “They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink” (Psalm 69:21).

Jesus “tasted thereof”, so he knew what was offered, “and he would not drink”. The verb behind “would” is thélō, to will, wish or choose, and with ou, “not”, and pínō, “to drink”, the phrase says that he was unwilling to drink it. He chose to go to the cross with a clear mind and to bear all of it awake. He had said that he lays down his life of himself (John 10:17–18), and Hebrews says of him that “for the joy that was set before him” he “endured the cross, despising the shame” (Hebrews 12:2–3).

Why did he refuse this drink and accept a later one?

The two drinks had different purposes. The first was meant to dull pain, and he refused it. Near the end, after the hours of darkness, a bystander lifted plain sour wine to him on a sponge (verse 48), and John records that Jesus said, “I thirst,” and received it (John 19:28–30). That later drink met the thirst of a dying man, whose tongue cleaved to his jaws as the psalm says (Psalm 22:15), and it fulfilled Psalm 69:21 a second time. It came when his work was almost finished. He refused what would numb him and accepted what met his thirst.

Crucified, and His Clothes Divided by Lot

Matthew tells the crucifixion itself in four words: “And they crucified him.” The verb stauróō, to crucify, comes from staurós, the cross. Rome kept this death for slaves, rebels and the lowest criminals, and it was designed to give the greatest pain and the deepest public shame.

The soldiers who carried out an execution took the condemned man’s clothes as their pay, and here they “parted his garments, casting lots”. The verb diamerízō means to divide up and distribute, its usual sense, and casting lots was the common way of deciding a share, much like throwing dice. Matthew’s quotation uses two words for clothing, himátion for “garments”, the outer clothing, and himatismós for “vesture”, clothing in general. John fills in the scene. Jesus’ coat was “without seam, woven from the top throughout”, and tearing it would have ruined it, so the soldiers cast lots to decide who would have it whole (John 19:23–24). They left him stripped of everything he had.

“That it might be fulfilled” uses plēróō, to fill up or complete, the word Matthew uses for Scripture coming true from the birth of Jesus onward (Matthew 1:22–23). The prophet is David, and the words are from Psalm 22:18. The soldiers were dividing a dying man’s clothes for their own gain, thinking only of the spoil, and they did exactly what God had spoken through David. God rules even the careless acts of men who oppose his Son, and his word comes true down to a garment and a throw of the lots. The whole of Psalm 22 runs through this passage: the mocking, the wagging heads, the trust in God thrown back at the sufferer, the garments and the opening cry.

The One stripped at Golgotha is the One who clothes his people. Isaiah rejoices that the LORD has clothed him with the garments of salvation (Isaiah 61:10), and that clothing was bought here.

The Soldiers Sit Down to Watch

“And sitting down they watched him there.” The verb káthēmai means to sit or be seated, and also to stay in a place for a time. The verb tēréō means to guard by keeping an eye on someone, and its tense in the Greek describes a watch that went on and on. The adverb ekeî is simply “there”, at that place. The soldiers settled in for a long duty. They guarded the condemned so that nobody could take him down or rescue him, and they stayed until death. John records that they later broke the legs of the two others, found Jesus already dead, and pierced his side (John 19:31–37).

For these men it was routine work. The psalmist had said of his enemies, “they look and stare upon me” (Psalm 22:17), and Luke tells of the people standing and watching while the rulers scoffed (Luke 23:35). The soldiers watched without understanding what they saw. Before them the Son of Man was being lifted up, as he said, to draw all men to himself (John 12:32), and the Father “spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all” (Romans 8:32).

The Charge over His Head: The King of the Jews

The “accusation” is aitía, a cause or reason, and in law a charge brought against someone. Rome’s custom was to display a placard, the titulus, naming the condemned man and his crime, and here it was fixed to the cross above Jesus’ head. “Written” is gráphō, to write. John adds that the title was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, so that everyone in the crowd could read it (John 19:20).

The charge was THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS. The word for king, basileús, means one with authority to rule. To Roman ears the title named sedition against Caesar. To Jewish ears it named the Messiah, the son of David whom Israel awaited to restore its kingdom. The soldiers had already hailed him “King of the Jews” in mockery (Matthew 27:29). The chief priests asked Pilate to change the words to “He said, I am King of the Jews”, and Pilate refused (John 19:19–22).

Pilate wrote a charge, and God made it a proclamation. Jesus is the King of the Jews, and his kingship stands at the very hour of his shame. He had told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). His throne that day was a cross and his crown was thorns, and because he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, God has highly exalted him and given him the name above every name (Philippians 2:5–11). The One under that title is “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Revelation 19:16).

Why did Pilate keep the wording?

Pilate’s reasons were probably mixed. He may have wished to assert Rome’s authority over the people, to sneer at the leaders who had pressed him to condemn Jesus, or simply to be done with a dispute he cared little about, seeing Jesus as one more agitator. Whatever he intended, his refusal kept the truth written over the cross for all to read.

Numbered with the Transgressors

“Then were there two thieves crucified with him.” The word for thief is lēistḗs, from a verb meaning to plunder, a robber or brigand. It describes a violent bandit, sometimes a rebel against Rome, and it is the word John uses for Barabbas (John 18:40), a rebel and a murderer. These men were crucified (stauróō) with Jesus, “one on the right hand, and another on the left”. The word dexiós simply means the right hand or right side, and the point of the arrangement is that Jesus hung in the middle. Rome placed him with the worst criminals, as one of them.

In doing so, Rome fulfilled Isaiah’s word about the suffering servant, “he was numbered with the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12), and Mark records that fulfilment (Mark 15:27–28). Luke tells how the two were led out with him to be put to death (Luke 23:32–33). Jesus had said that he came to call sinners to repentance (Mark 2:17), and he died among the guilty, for the guilty. “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).

Verse 44 returns to these men. “The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.” “Crucified with” is systauróō, to crucify together with, a word for sharing the same death. “Cast in his teeth” is oneidízō, to reproach, rail at, taunt or upbraid. “The same” means the taunts the rulers had just used, save thyself, come down, if thou be the Son of God. Even the men dying beside him, under the same punishment, turned on him, and every voice around the cross was raised against him.

Did both thieves mock him?

Both thieves joined the mockery at first, and later one of them changed. Luke records that one rebuked the other, asked Jesus to remember him when he came into his kingdom, and heard the promise, “To day shalt thou be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:39–43). Matthew gives the opening hours, when both men railed on him, and Luke gives what happened later, when one of them turned to Jesus. The two accounts tell of the same hours from different points in them.

Mocked by Passers-by and Rulers

The passers-by

“They that passed by” (paraporeúomai, to travel near) were ordinary people on the road beside Golgotha, swelled by the Passover crowds in Jerusalem. They “reviled him”, blasphēméō, to vilify, rail on or speak impiously, the word used for blasphemy against God, and here it was hurled at the Son of God. “Wagging their heads” joins kinéō, to stir or move, and kephalḗ, the head, in a gesture of scorn and of triumph over someone fallen. David had written, “All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head” (Psalm 22:6–8), and another psalm speaks of enemies shaking their heads (Psalm 109:25). Isaiah said the servant would be “despised and rejected of men” (Isaiah 53:3).

Their words twisted something Jesus had said: “Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself.” False witnesses had used the same claim against him at his trial (Matthew 26:61). What Jesus actually said, early in his ministry, was “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”, and John explains, “But he spake of the temple of his body” (John 2:19–21). The verb katalýō means to loosen down or demolish, and oikodoméō means to build. The mockers took his words of the stone temple in Jerusalem, and in their scorn they named the very thing that was about to happen. His body was being destroyed that day, and in three days he would raise it.

“If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross” uses the words Satan used in the wilderness, “If thou be the Son of God” (Matthew 4:3). The Father had already answered the question at the baptism and on the mountain of the transfiguration: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17, Matthew 17:5). “Save” is sṓzō, to save, deliver or protect, and the same verb comes back in verses 42 and 49. The mockers meant escape from the cross. Jesus was saving the world by staying on it, which is why Paul calls the preaching of the cross the power of God to those who are saved (1 Corinthians 1:18–25).

The rulers

“Likewise” (homoíōs, in the same way) the chief priests, scribes and elders joined in. The chief priests (archiereús) were the heads of the priesthood, mostly Sadducees, and they ran the temple. The scribes were experts in the Law of Moses, many of them Pharisees, and the elders were leading men of the people. Together they made up the council that had condemned Jesus. “Mocking” is empaízō, to jeer at or deride, the verb used for the soldiers’ mockery in the hall of the governor. The men who knew the Scriptures best stood at the foot of the cross and jeered at the One the Scriptures were about.

They spoke about him to the crowd: “He saved others; himself he cannot save.” The verb sṓzō stands behind both “saved” and “save”. “He saved others” admits what they could hardly deny, his healings and deliverances throughout his ministry. “He cannot save” is ou, “not”, with dýnamai, to be able, and they meant that he lacked the power. Jesus had told Peter in the garden that he could pray to his Father and at once be given twelve legions of angels and more (Matthew 26:53). His staying was the obedience of the Son, and the blood he was shedding was “my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). The rulers spoke the truth in their scorn: to save others, he stayed.

“If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.” The title echoes the charge over his head, with the same word for king, and they demanded a sign of power that fitted their own idea of the Messiah. The resurrection three days later was a far greater sign, and still most of them refused to believe.

“He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God.” “Trusted” is peíthō, to persuade, and in the sense here, to trust or rely on. “Deliver” is rhýomai, to rescue or draw out. “If he will have him” uses thélō again, if God wants him, if God takes pleasure in him. “Son” is huiós. Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God was the ground of his condemnation, when the high priest put him on oath and the council judged him worthy of death (Matthew 26:63–66), and the leaders told Pilate that by their law he ought to die for making himself the Son of God (John 19:7). Their taunt repeats almost word for word what David wrote of the righteous sufferer: “He trusted on the LORD that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him” (Psalm 22:8). They fulfilled the psalm while mocking the One it described. The Father did delight in his Son, and he delivered him through the cross, raising him from the dead.

Why did Jesus stay on the cross when he had power to come down?

Jesus stayed on the cross because that was how he would save others. He came to “save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21) and to “give his life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28), and the way to do that was to die in their place. Peter writes that he “his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24). Coming down would have pleased the crowd and left us in our sins. He stayed until the work was done, and now, having died unto sin once, he lives unto God and death has lost its dominion over him (Romans 6:9–10). Through his blood we have redemption and are brought into the kingdom of God’s dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14).

Darkness over All the Land

“Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.” The sixth hour is about noon and the ninth about three in the afternoon, so for three hours in the middle of the day, when the sun is highest, the land went dark. The word skótos is darkness, literal or figurative. “There was” is gínomai, to become or come about, and it reports that darkness came. “Land” is gē, which can mean the earth, a land or the ground. Here “all the land” most likely means the whole region of Judea, so that everyone in and around Jerusalem saw it. Mark and Luke record the same darkness (Mark 15:33, Luke 23:44–45).

Was the darkness an eclipse?

The darkness was an act of God. Passover was always kept at the full moon, and an eclipse of the sun can only happen at the new moon, when the moon passes between the sun and the earth. At Passover an eclipse was impossible.

In Scripture darkness sent by God often marks his judgment. One of the plagues on Egypt was darkness (Exodus 10:21–23). Amos foretold a day when God would make the sun go down at noon (Amos 8:9–10), and Joel and Isaiah speak of the sun darkened at the day of the LORD (Joel 2:31, Isaiah 13:10). In these hours the Son was bearing the judgment due to our sin, made sin for us, and the darkness covered that holy and terrible work.

Jesus had said, “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12), and the light of the world went into the dark so that we could come out of it. The Father “hath delivered us from the power of darkness” (Colossians 1:13–14), Christ came “to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death” (Luke 1:79), believers are now “light in the Lord” (Ephesians 5:8), and God has called his people “out of darkness into his marvellous light” (1 Peter 2:9).

“My God, My God, Why Hast Thou Forsaken Me?”

“About the ninth hour”, as the darkness ended, “Jesus cried with a loud voice”. The verb anaboáō is to cry aloud, and the cry was loud enough for all around to hear. Jesus had been on the cross since the third hour, and the ninth hour was also the time of the evening sacrifice at the temple and an hour of prayer.

His words are given as he spoke them. The word ēlí is of Hebrew origin and means “my God”, spoken twice. The word lamá means “why”, and sabachtháni, an Aramaic word, means “thou hast left me”. Matthew then translates them: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” “Forsaken” is enkataleípō, to leave behind in a place, and in its bad sense to desert or abandon.

These are the opening words of Psalm 22:1. Every Jew who knew the Scriptures would have recognised them, and the psalm they begin goes on to describe the mocking, the pierced hands and feet (Psalm 22:16) and the parted garments, and ends with God’s deliverance and praise. Even in the depths, Jesus calls him “my God”. Earlier he had prayed for the men who crucified him, “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34), and this cry is the deepest point of all his suffering.

Was the Son truly forsaken by the Father?

Jesus truly bore the forsakenness that sin deserves. The sinless One was made sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21) and “made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13). God is “of purer eyes than to behold evil” (Habakkuk 1:13), and as the Son bore the sin of the world, the Father withdrew the comfort of his presence and poured out on him the judgment that sin brings. The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit remained one God, and the unity of the Godhead stayed whole. What the Son endured was a real and unique forsaking in the place of sinners, for the hours he bore our sin.

Because he was forsaken, those who belong to him are kept for ever. The promise “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Hebrews 13:5) rests on this cry. The cry also shows us a Saviour who knows the deepest human anguish from the inside, a high priest “touched with the feeling of our infirmities” (Hebrews 4:15).

“This Man Calleth for Elias”

“Some of them that stood there” (ekeî again), “when they heard (akoúō) that”, said that Jesus was calling for Elijah. The name Hēlías is the Greek form of Elijah, and in the KJV it stands as Elias. “Calleth for” is phōnéō, to call out or summon. “Eli” sounded like the prophet’s name, and Israel was expecting Elijah, because God had said, “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD” (Malachi 4:5). Elijah had been taken up to heaven alive (2 Kings 2:11), and some looked for him to come and help those in distress. During Jesus’ ministry some people had even thought Jesus himself was Elias (Matthew 16:13–14).

Some may have misheard in earnest, and others twisted his words for one more jest. Either way, the cry of the Son to his Father was heard as a call for a prophet. Peter had misunderstood the cross in the same way when he rebuked Jesus for speaking of it (Matthew 16:21–23), and John writes of Jesus, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10–11).

The sponge of vinegar

“Straightway”, euthéōs, immediately, one of them ran (tréchō), took (lambánō) a sponge (spóngos), filled it (plḗthō) with vinegar, put it on (peritíthēmi, to place around) a reed (kálamos), and gave him to drink (potízō). The vinegar is óxos, the same word as in verse 34, cheap sour wine, often watered down. The reed lifted the sponge to the mouth of a man raised up on a cross. John records that this came after Jesus said “I thirst”, and that the sponge was put on hyssop (John 19:28–30), the plant Israel used in its rites of cleansing. Mark tells the same moment (Mark 15:35–36), and once more Psalm 69:21 was fulfilled.

The man’s motive is left open. He ran at once, which may show pity for a dying man’s thirst, or the sour drink may have been one more piece of mockery among people who were jeering. Whatever he meant, his act fulfilled Scripture. The reed recalls the one the soldiers had put in Jesus’ hand to mock him as king, and the bitter drink recalls the cup Jesus had asked his Father in Gethsemane to take from him, if it were possible (Matthew 26:39). He had come in the likeness of men (Philippians 2:5–11), and he thirsted as men thirst.

“Let us see whether Elias will come”

“The rest”, loipoí, the others, said, “Let be”, leave him alone, wait. “Let us see whether Elias will come to save him.” Here the verb sṓzō closes the passage, and the mockery of verse 40 and verse 42 comes round again. They waited for a prophet to rescue Jesus from death, while Jesus was saving them by his death. Moments later he cried again and yielded up the ghost, and the veil of the temple was torn and the earth shook (Matthew 27:50–54). Three days later he rose, “raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25).

The Saviour Who Stayed on the Cross

This passage shows us the cross as God’s own plan, carried out to the letter. Psalm 22, Psalm 69 and Isaiah 53 were written long before, and soldiers, rulers and passers-by fulfilled them without knowing it. God’s word held in the darkest hour, and it holds now.

It shows us a Saviour who chose this death. He tasted the numbing drink and refused it. He was dared to come down and stayed. The silent servant of Isaiah, who “opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7), bore every taunt, and Peter writes that “when he was reviled, reviled not again” (1 Peter 2:23). The cup he drank was the new testament in his blood (Luke 22:20), and by the blood of his cross God has made peace and reconciled all things to himself (Colossians 1:19–20).

It shows us what our sin cost and how far God’s love went. The Son was counted among the transgressors and bore the darkness and the forsaking so that we would be brought into the light and kept by God for ever. If you belong to Christ, the cry of verse 46 was raised for you, and the promise that he will stay with you rests on it. Simon, pressed into service, walked behind Jesus with the cross on his shoulders, and the disciples of Jesus still take up their cross and follow him, carrying one another’s burdens as he carried ours.

Last revised

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

16 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

16 quotes · AD 220–1150
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
200300400500600700800900100011001200

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Christ, moreover, he affirms to have been sent, not by this maker of the world, but by the above-named Abraxas; and to have come in a phantasm, and been destitute of the substance of flesh: that it was not He who suffered among the Jews, but that Simon was crucified in His stead: whence, again, there must be no believing on him who was crucified, lest one confess to having believed on Simon.
“As they went out, they came upon a man of Cyrene, Simon by name; they compelled this man to carry the cross” of Christ. It was fitting not only for the Savior to take up his cross but also for us to carry it, doing compulsory service for our salvation. Furthermore, we did not benefit by taking up his cross then as much as we benefit by it now, since he takes it upon himself and carries it.
d. AD 253Origen of Alexandriaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Ante-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or, as they went out, they laid hold of Simon, but when they drew near to the place in which they would crucify Him, they laid the cross upon Him that He might bear it. Simon obtained not this office by chance, but was brought to the spot by God's providence, that he might be found worthy of mention in the Scriptures of the Gospel, and of the ministry of the cross of Christ. And it was not only meet that the Saviour should carry His cross, but meet also that we should take part therein, filling a carriage so beneficial to us, ἀγγαρεία. Yet would it not have so profited us to take it on us, as we have profited by His taking it upon Himself.
d. AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
For a Jew was not worthy to bear Christ's cross, but it was reserved for the faith of the Gentiles both to take the cross, and to suffer with Him.

Such is the place of the cross, set up in the centre of the earth, that it might be equally free to all nations to attain the knowledge of God.

Or, He therefore refused the wine mingled with gall, because the bitterness of sin is not mingled with the incorruption of eternal glory.
d. AD 406Chromatius of AquileiaPost-NiceneSourceTRACTATE ON MATTHEW 19.5
Finally, the Gospel reports in the present reading that as the Lord was being led to his Passion, “they found a certain man of Cyrene named Simon and compelled him to carry the cross.” The cross of Christ is the triumph of virtue and a trophy of victory. How blessed is Simon, who deserved to be the first to bear so great a sign of victory! He was compelled to carry the cross before the Lord because the Lord wanted to demonstrate his cross to be a singular grace of that heavenly mystery which is himself: God and man, Logos and flesh, Son of God and Son of man. He was crucified as man but triumphed as God in the mystery of the cross. His suffering was of the flesh, but his glorious victory was divine. Through his cross, Christ defeated both death and the devil. Through the cross, Christ mounted his chariot of victory and chose the four Evangelists, as though horses for his chariot, to announce so great a victory to all the world. Simon of Cyrene therefore was carrying the instrument of this great triumph in his arms. He was a partaker of the Passion of Christ so that he might be a partaker of his resurrection, as the apostle teaches: “If we die with him, we will also live with him. If we endure with him, we will also reign with him.” Similarly the Lord himself says in the Gospel: “He who does not take up his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.”
For after "they had mocked Him, they led Him to crucify Him," it is said, and when they had stripped Him, they took His garments, and sat down and watched Him, when He should die. And they divide His garments amongst them, which sort of thing is done in the case of very vile and abject criminals, and such as have no one belonging to them, and are in utter desolation.

They parted the garments, by which such great miracles were done. But they wrought none now, Christ restraining His unspeakable power. And this was no small addition of insult. For as to one base and abject, as I said, and the vilest of all men; so do they dare to do all things. To the thieves at any rate they did nothing of the kind, but to Christ they dare it all. And they crucified Him in the midst of them, that He might share in their reputation.

And they gave Him gall to drink, and this to insult Him, but He would not. But another saith, that having tasted it, He said, "It is finished." And what meaneth, "It is finished?" The prophecy was fulfilled concerning Him. "For they gave me," it is said, "gall for my meat, and for my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink." But neither doth that evangelist indicate that He drank, for merely to taste differs not from not drinking, but hath one and the same signification.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. de Cruc. et Lat. ii.) The Lord would not suffer under a roof, or in the Jewish Temple, that you should not suppose that He was offered for that people alone; but without the city, without the walls, that you might know that the sacrifice was common, that it was the offering of the whole earth, that the purification was general.
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 32) And as they went out, they found a man of Cyrene, named Simon: him they compelled to bear his cross. Lest anyone think that this account is contradictory to the story of John the Evangelist. For he said that the Lord, going out of the praetorium, carried his own cross; but Matthew reports that they found a man of Cyrene, named Simon, whom they compelled to bear Jesus' cross. But this is to be understood, that Jesus, going out of the praetorium, himself carried his own cross; afterward they encountered Simon, to whom they imposed the task of carrying the cross. According to anagoge, the nations accept the cross of Jesus, and the obedient stranger carries the ignominy of the Savior.
d. AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
It is to be noted, that when Jesus is scourged and spit upon, He has not on His own garments, but those which He took for our sins; but when He is crucified, and the show of His mockery is completed, then He takes again His former garments, and His own dress, and immediately the elements are shaken, and the creature gives testimony to the Creator.

Let none think that John's narrative contradicts this place of the Evangelist. John says that the Lord went forth from the prætorium bearing His cross; Matthew tells, that they found a man of Cyrene upon whom they laid Jesus' cross. We must suppose that as Jesus went out of the prætorium, He was bearing His cross, and that afterwards they met Simon, whom they compelled to bear it.

Figuratively, the nations take up the cross, and the foreigner by obedience bears the ignominy of the Saviour.

I have heard Calvary expoundedb as the spot in which Adam was buried, as though it had been so called from the head of the old man being buried there. A plausible interpretation, and agreeable to the ears of the people, yet not a true one. Without the city outside the gate are the places where criminals are executed, and these have got the name of Calvary, that is, of the beheaded. And Jesus was crucified there, that where the plot of criminals had been, there might be set up the flag of martyrdom. But Adam was buried near Ebron and Arbee, as we read in the volume of Jesus the son of Navec.

The bitter vine makes bitter wine; this they gave the Lord Jesus to drink, that that might be fulfilled which was written, They gave me also gall for my meat. (Ps. 69:21.) And God addresses Jerusalem, I had planted there a true vine, how art thou turned into the bitterness of a strange vine? (Jer. 2:21.)
d. AD 444Cyril of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceFRAGMENT 306.32
The Savior is led to the suffering that brings salvation. They laid his cross on Simeon of Cyrene. Another of the holy Evangelists said that Jesus himself carried the cross. Now surely both [accounts] are correct. For the Savior carried the cross, and, having met the Cyrene about half way, they transferred the cross to him. It is said about him through the voice of Isaiah that “a child has been born to us, and a son has been given to us, and the government shall be upon his shoulders.” Now the cross has become the means by which he governs, through which he continues to rule over all heaven, since it is true that even as “far as death” he has become “obedient, even to death of a cross. Therefore God has exalted him.”
d. AD 461Leo the GreatPost-NiceneSourceSERMON 46.5
But as the multitudes went with Jesus to the place of punishment, a certain Simon of Cyrene was found on whom to lay the wood of the cross, instead of the Lord. Even this act signified that faith would come to the Gentiles, to whom the cross of Christ was not to be shame but glory. It was not accidental therefore but symbolic and mystical, that while the Jewish rulers were raging against Christ, a foreigner was found to share his sufferings. Thus the apostle would say, “If we suffer with him, we shall also reign with him.”Note that it was not a Hebrew or an Israelite but a foreigner who was drawn into service for the Savior in his most holy humiliation. By this transference the propitiation of the spotless Lamb and the fulfillment of all mysteries passed from the circumcision to the uncircumcision, from the sons according to the flesh to the sons according to the spirit. Hence the apostle would say, “Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us.” He offered himself to the Father as a new and true sacrifice of reconciliation. He was slain not in the temple, whose worship was now at an end, and not within the confines of the city which for its sin was doomed to be destroyed, but beyond the walls of the city, “outside the gate.” Thus with the cessation of the old symbolic victims, a new victim was being placed on a new altar. The cross of Christ was to become the altar not of the temple but of the world.
d. AD 533Remigius of Rheimsas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
For this Simon was not a man of Jerusalem, but a foreigner, and denizen, being a Cyrenean; Cyrene is a town of Lybia. Simon is interpreted 'obedient,' and a Cyrenean 'an heir;' whence he well denotes the people of the Gentiles, which was strange to the testaments of God, but by believing became a fellow-citizen of the saints, of the household, and an heir of God.
d. AD 604Gregory the Dialogistas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. in. Ev. xxxii. 3.) Or otherwise; By Simon who bears the burden of the Lord's cross are denoted those who are abstinent and proud; these by their abstinence afflict their flesh, but seek not within the fruit of abstinence. Thus Simon bears the cross, but does not die thereon, as these afflict the body, but in desire of vain-glory live to the world.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
The three evangelists say that Simon carried the cross of Jesus, while John says that the Lord carried it Himself. It is likely that both events occurred. At first Jesus carried the cross as no one else was willing to carry it; but along the way they found Simon and placed the cross on him. You, O reader, learn this as well, that "Simon" means "obedience"; therefore he who possesses obedience is he who carries the cross of Christ. And Cyrene was one of the five cities of Pentapolis, signifying the five senses that are compelled to bear the cross.
AD 1150Glossa Ordinariaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(non occ. Aug. de Cons. Ev. iii. 9.) After the Evangelist had narrated what concerned the mocking of Christ, he proceeds to His crucifixion.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 27:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8