TRV
“Jesus Questions the Pharisees on the Messiah”· Matthew 22:41–46
Translation
American Standard Version
Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them a question,
World English Bible Messianic
Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Yeshua asked them a question,
Young's Literal Translation
And the Pharisees having been gathered together, Jesus did question them,
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 23,914 of 31,102 · 76.9%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
4005006007008009001000110012001300
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Then since He had answered, He asks also in turn, "What think ye of Christ, whose Son is He? They say unto Him, The Son of David."
See after how many miracles, after how many signs, after how many questions, after how great a display of His unanimity with the Father, as well in words, as in deeds; after having praised this man that said, that there is one God, He asks the question, that they may not be able to say, that He did miracles indeed, yet was an adversary to the law, and a foe to God.
Therefore, after so many things, He asks these questions, secretly leading them on to confess Him also to be God. And the disciples He asked first what the others say, and then themselves; but these not so; for surely they would have said a deceiver, and a wicked one, as speaking all things without fear. So for this cause He inquires for the opinion of these men themselves.
For since He was now about to go on to His passion, He sets forth the prophecy that plainly proclaims Him to be Lord; and not as having come to do this without occasion, nor as having made this His aim, but from a reasonable cause.
For having asked them first, since they answered not the truth concerning Him (for they said He was a mere man), to overthrow their mistaken opinion, He thus introduces David proclaiming His Godhead. For they indeed supposed that He was a mere man, wherefore also they said, "the Son of David;" but He to correct this brings in the prophet witnessing to His being Lord, and the genuineness of His Sonship, and His equality in honor with His Father.
And not even at this doth He stop, but in order to move them to fear, He adds what followeth also, saying, "Till I make Thine enemies Thy footstool;" that at least in this way He might gain them over.
And that they may not say, that it was in flattery he so called Him, and that this was a human judgment, see what He saith, "How then doth David in spirit call Him Lord?" See how submissively He introduces the sentence and judgment concerning Himself. First, He had said, "What think ye? Whose Son is He?" so by a question to bring them to an answer. Then since they said, "the Son of David," He said not, "And yet David saith these things," but again in this order of a question, "How then doth David in spirit call Him Lord?" in order that the sayings might not give offense to them.
And He Himself too in like manner for this cause introduces the doctrine in the way of question and inference, saying, "How then doth David in spirit call Him Lord, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit Thou on my right hand, until I make Thy foes Thy footstool;" and again, "If David then call Him Lord, how is He then his Son," not taking away the fact that He is his Son, away with the thought; for He would not then have reproved Peter for this, but to correct their secret thoughts. So that when He saith, "How is He his Son?" He meaneth this, not so as ye say. For they said, that He is Son only, and not also Lord. And this after the testimony, and then submissively, "If David then call Him Lord, how is He his Son?"
But, nevertheless, even when they had heard these things, they answered nothing, for neither did they wish to learn any of the things that were needful. Wherefore He Himself addeth and saith, that "He is his Lord." Or rather not even this very thing doth He say without support, but having taken the prophet with Him, because of His being exceedingly distrusted by them, and evil reported of amongst them. To which fact we ought to have especial regard, and if anything be said by Him that is lowly and submissive, not to be offended, for the cause is this, with many other things also, that He talks with them in condescension.
Wherefore now also He delivers His doctrine in the manner of question and answer; but He darkly intimates even in this way His dignity. For it was not as much to be called Lord of the Jews, as of David.
But mark thou also, I pray thee, how seasonable it is. For when He had said, "There is one Lord," then He spake of Himself that He is Lord, and showed it by prophecy, no more by His works only. And He showeth the Father Himself taking vengeance upon them in His behalf, for He saith, "Until I make Thine enemies Thy footstool;" and great unanimity even hereby on the part of Him that begat Him towards Himself, and honor. And upon His reasonings with them He doth set this end high and great, and sufficient to close fast their mouths.
(Hom. lxxi.) He first asked His disciples what others said of Christ, and then what they themselves said; but not so to these. For they would have said that He was a deceiver, and wicked. They thought that Christ was to be mere man, and therefore they say unto Him, The Son of David. To reprove this, He brings forward the Prophet, witnessing His dominion, proper Sonship, and His joint honour with His Father.
But He rests not with this, but that they may fear, He adds, Till I make thine enemies thy footstool; that at least by terror He might gain them.
This conclusion He put to their questionings, as final, and sufficient to stop their mouth. Henceforward accordingly they held their peace, not by their own good-will, but from not having aught to say.
This passage is out of the 109th Psalm. Christ is therefore called David's Lord, not in respect of His descent from him, but in respect of His eternal generation from the Father, wherein He was before His fleshly Father. And he calls Him Lord, not by a mere chance, nor of his own thought, but by the Holy Spirit.
This question is still available for us against the Jews; for these who believe that Christ is yet to come, assert that He is a mere man, though a holy one, of the race of David. Let us then thus taught by the Lord ask them, If He be mere man, and only the Son of David, how does David call Him his Lord? To evade the truth of this question, the Jews invent many frivolous answers. They allege Abraham's steward, he whose son was Eliezer of Damascus, and say that this Psalm was composed in his person, when after the overthrow of the five kings, the Lord God said to his lord Abraham, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool. Let us ask how Abraham could say the things that follow, and compel them to tell us how Abraham was born before Lucifer, and how he was a Priest after the order of Melchisedech, for whom Melchisedech brought bread and wine, and of whom he received tithes of the spoil?
(verses 41 onwards) But when the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus questioned them, saying, 'What do you think about the Christ, whose son is he?' They said to him, 'David.' He said to them, 'How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, "The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool?" If David then calls him Lord, how is he his son?' Those who had gathered together to test Jesus and tried to capture the truth through deceitful questioning, gave an opportunity for their own refutation. They are asked (or, it is asked) about Christ whose son he is. The questioning of Jesus benefits us even today against the Jews. And indeed those who confess that Christ is to come assert that he is a simple man and a holy man from the lineage of David. Let us therefore question those who are taught by the Lord: if he is a simple man and only a son of David, how does David call him his Lord? Not by uncertain error or personal will, but in the Holy Spirit (or, but in the Holy Spirit, he is silent). The testimony, however, which he presents, is taken from the one hundred and ninth Psalm. Therefore, David is called Lord, not according to what he was born, but according to what he always was, born from the Father, surpassing his own Father in the flesh. The Jews, in order to evade the truth of the question, invent many idle things, asserting that the native of Abraham, whose son was Damascus Eliezer, and that the psalm was written from that person's perspective, in which the Lord God said to his lord, Abraham, after the slaughter of the five kings: Sit at my right hand, until I make thy enemies thy footstool. (Genesis 14). Whom should we ask: How did God say to Abraham these things that follow: With you is the beginning in the day of your power, in the splendors of the saints, I have begotten you before Lucifer; and: The Lord has sworn, and will not regret it; you are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek? And we should try to answer how Abraham was born before Lucifer and was a priest according to the order of Melchizedek: regarding whom Melchizedek offered bread and wine, and from whom he received tithes of the spoils.
The Jews tempted Christ, supposing Him to be mere man; had they believed Him to be the Son of God, they would not have tempted Him. Christ therefore, willing to show that He knew the treachery of their hearts, and that He was God, yet would not declare this truth to them plainly, that they might not take occasion thence to charge Him with blasphemy, and yet would not totally conceal this truth; because to that end had He come that He should preach the truth; He therefore puts a question to them, such as should declare to them who He was; What think ye of Christ? whose Son is He?
I suppose that He formed this question, not only against the Pharisees, but also against the heretics; for according to the flesh He was truly David's Son, but his Lord according to His Godhead.
That He says, Sit thou on my right hand, is not to be taken as though God had a body, and either a right hand or a left hand; but to sit on the right hand of God is to abide in the honour and equality of the Father's majesty.
But till is used for indefinite time, that the meaning be, Sit Thou for ever, and for ever hold thine enemies beneath thy feet.
Hence we learn that the poison of jealousy may be overcome, but can hardly of itself rest at peace.
Since they thought He was a mere man, He overturns their belief and by means of the prophecy of David (Ps. 109:1) teaches the truth, that He is also the Lord, proclaiming His own divinity. For when the Pharisees said that the Christ was the son of David, that is, a mere man, He says, How then does David name Him Lord, and he does not simply name Him Lord, but in spirit, that is, as revealed to him by the grace of the Spirit? He does not say this to deny that He is the son of David, but to show that He is not a mere man, descended only from the Davidic seed. The Lord asks these questions so that if they would answer, "We do not know," they might ask and learn; or if they would answer the truth, that they might believe; or if they could not answer, that they might be put to shame and leave, no longer daring to interrogate Him.
(ap. Anselm.) That it is by the Father that the enemies are put under the Son, denotes not the Son's weakness, but the union of His nature with His Father. For the Son also puts under Him the Father's enemies, when He glorifies His name upon earth. He concludes from this authority, If David then call Him Lord, how is He his son?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 22:41 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 22:41 marks a pivotal moment in Jesus' final week of ministry in Jerusalem, signaling a dramatic shift in the ongoing confrontations with the Jewish religious leaders. Having successfully and decisively silenced the Pharisees, Herodians, and Sadducees through their various attempts to trap Him with questions, Jesus now takes the initiative, turning the tables by posing His own profound question to the Pharisees who remained gathered before Him. This brief verse sets the stage for Jesus' ultimate challenge to their understanding of the Messiah's identity and nature, underscoring His divine authority and wisdom.
Context
Literary Context
Matthew 22:41 immediately follows a series of intense verbal confrontations between Jesus and various factions of Jewish religious leaders within the Temple courts during Passion Week. Prior to this verse, Jesus had masterfully navigated three distinct traps set by His adversaries. First, the Pharisees and Herodians attempted to ensnare Him with a question about paying taxes to Caesar, which Jesus brilliantly answered by distinguishing between earthly and divine allegiances (Matthew 22:15-22). Next, the Sadducees, who denied the resurrection, posed a convoluted hypothetical about marriage in the afterlife, which Jesus refuted by affirming God's power and the reality of resurrection (Matthew 22:23-33). Finally, a lawyer, a Pharisee, sought to test Him by asking about the greatest commandment, to which Jesus responded with a profound summary encompassing love for God and neighbor, effectively silencing all further attempts to question Him (Matthew 22:34-40). Having demonstrated His unparalleled wisdom and authority, Jesus now seizes the rhetorical offensive, turning from being the questioned to the questioner, with the very Pharisees He had just defeated still present and observing.
Historical & Cultural Context
The setting is the Temple courts in Jerusalem, a highly charged environment during the Passover festival, when the city was teeming with pilgrims and religious fervor was at its peak. The Pharisees were the dominant religious sect among the Jewish people, known for their strict adherence to the Mosaic Law and their oral traditions. They held significant influence over the populace and were often in opposition to Jesus due to His challenges to their interpretations of the Law and His claims of divine authority. Their "gathering together" implies a concerted effort, perhaps to strategize further against Jesus or to witness His public humiliation, which never materialized. Jesus' act of questioning them publicly, after having silenced their best attempts, was a profound challenge to their religious authority and intellectual pride, especially given their esteemed position as teachers of the Law. This public discourse was typical of rabbinic teaching and debate in that era, where teachers would engage in dialectical exchanges to prove their understanding and authority.
Key Themes
This brief verse, though transitional, is rich with thematic significance. It powerfully illustrates a shift in initiative and authority, as Jesus moves from defending Himself against the cunning questions of His adversaries to proactively challenging their core theological understanding. This demonstrates Jesus' sovereignty and control over the discourse, reinforcing His divine wisdom and prophetic role, much like when He taught with an authority unlike the scribes (Matthew 7:29). The verse also serves as a crucial preparation for the Messiah's identity, setting the immediate stage for Jesus' direct question about the Messiah's lineage and nature in the subsequent verses (Matthew 22:42-46). By initiating this line of questioning, Jesus forces the Pharisees to confront their own incomplete and often flawed understanding of the Christ, particularly concerning His divine sonship in relation to His Davidic lineage, thereby exposing their spiritual blindness and intellectual limitations despite their religious erudition.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Derived from a Hebrew root meaning "to separate," the Pharisees were a prominent Jewish religious and political party in the Second Temple period. They were known for their strict observance of the Mosaic Law, their emphasis on oral tradition, and their belief in the resurrection and the existence of angels. In the Gospels, they frequently appear as Jesus' primary antagonists, challenging His authority and teachings. Here, their presence signifies the continued opposition of the religious establishment to Jesus, even after their previous attempts to trap Him had failed.
This verb means "to lead together, collect, or convene." Its use here emphasizes the collective presence of the Pharisees. They were not merely individuals but a united front, perhaps still reeling from their previous defeats, or perhaps regrouping to consider their next move against Jesus. Their "gathering together" provides the perfect audience for Jesus' decisive and challenging question, ensuring that His words would be heard by those who most needed to hear them.
This word means "to ask for, inquire, or seek." While it can denote a simple inquiry, in the context of these debates, it carries the weight of a strategic challenge or a probing question designed to expose truth or error. Jesus' "asking" is not a sign of ignorance but a deliberate rhetorical move to shift the initiative, expose the spiritual and theological blind spots of His opponents, and reveal His own identity as the Messiah.
Verse Breakdown
"¶ While the Pharisees were gathered together"
This opening clause establishes the critical setting and audience. The paragraph mark (¶) in the KJV often signals a significant break or new logical division in the narrative, highlighting the shift from the Pharisees' questioning of Jesus to Jesus' questioning of them. The Pharisees, as the leading religious authority and Jesus' most persistent adversaries, are depicted as being present and attentive, perhaps still smarting from their recent defeats or observing with renewed hostility. Their collective presence underscores the public nature of the confrontation and ensures that Jesus' subsequent question will be heard by those who represent the religious establishment.
"Jesus asked them,"
This concise phrase marks the dramatic turning point of the entire chapter. After enduring multiple attempts to trap Him, Jesus now takes the offensive. His "asking" is not a sign of weakness or a simple request for information, but a powerful, strategic rhetorical move. It demonstrates His supreme authority and wisdom, as He seizes control of the discourse and prepares to challenge the very core of His opponents' theological understanding regarding the Messiah. This initiative underscores His role as the divine teacher and ultimate authority.
Literary Devices
Matthew 22:41 employs several subtle but powerful literary devices. There is a clear Dramatic Shift in the narrative's power dynamic. For much of Matthew 22, Jesus is on the defensive, responding to the cunning questions of His adversaries. With this verse, Jesus decisively takes the offensive, becoming the interrogator, which immediately elevates His authority and puts His opponents on the defensive. This shift is highlighted by the contrast between "they asked him" in previous verses and "Jesus asked them" here. Furthermore, the verse serves as significant Foreshadowing, as it immediately precedes Jesus' profound question about the Messiah's identity. The simple act of "asking" here sets the stage for a revelation that will expose the Pharisees' inadequate understanding of Christ, hinting at the deeper theological truths Jesus is about to unveil. Finally, there is an element of Irony in Jesus' action. The very ones who sought to trap and discredit Him with their questions are now themselves about to be trapped and exposed by His single, penetrating inquiry, demonstrating the futility of human cunning against divine wisdom.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 22:41, though brief, is profoundly significant in its theological implications, primarily by demonstrating Jesus' divine sovereignty and His role as the ultimate revealer of truth. Having silenced all human opposition, Jesus now asserts His authority not merely by refuting error but by proactively guiding the conversation to the most crucial theological point: the identity of the Messiah. This moment underscores that true understanding of God's plan and the Scriptures comes not from human intellectual prowess or adherence to tradition, but through divine revelation embodied in Christ. It highlights the spiritual blindness of those who, despite their religious learning, failed to recognize God's Son standing before them. Jesus' question forces a confrontation with the inadequacy of their Messianic expectations, which were often limited to a political or earthly deliverer, rather than the divine Son of God.
Reflection and Application
Matthew 22:41, though a transitional verse, offers profound insights for contemporary believers. It reminds us that true spiritual authority and wisdom do not reside in human titles, intellectual prowess, or religious adherence alone, but in a genuine understanding of and submission to Jesus Christ. Just as Jesus exposed the spiritual blindness of the Pharisees, this verse challenges us to examine our own hearts and minds, ensuring that our understanding of Christ is not based on incomplete or distorted perceptions, but on the full revelation of Scripture. It calls us to move beyond superficial religious observance to a deep, transformative relationship with the Son of God. Furthermore, it encourages us to recognize that God often works in unexpected ways, shifting dynamics and revealing truth through simple yet profound questions, rather than complex arguments. We are called to be discerning, to question our own assumptions, and to always be open to the Holy Spirit's leading in understanding God's Word and His will for our lives.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is it significant that Jesus asked the Pharisees a question, rather than continuing to answer theirs?
The significance of Jesus asking the Pharisees a question in Matthew 22:41 lies in the dramatic shift of initiative and authority. For much of Matthew 22, Jesus had been on the defensive, skillfully deflecting and refuting the cunning questions posed by various Jewish factions (Pharisees, Herodians, Sadducees) designed to trap Him. By taking the offensive and posing His own question, Jesus asserts His divine authority and control over the discourse. It demonstrates that He is not merely a respondent to human challenges but the ultimate Teacher and Revealer of truth. This move also serves to expose the spiritual and theological blind spots of His adversaries, forcing them to confront their own inadequate understanding of the Messiah, which they, as religious leaders, should have possessed. It highlights that true wisdom comes from God, not from human cunning or religious titles.
What does the phrase "While the Pharisees were gathered together" imply about the situation?
The phrase "While the Pharisees were gathered together" (KJV) in Matthew 22:41 is significant because it emphasizes the collective and public nature of the confrontation. It suggests that these religious leaders, who had just been decisively defeated in their attempts to trap Jesus with questions (as seen in Matthew 22:15-40), were still present. They might have been regrouping, conferring, or simply observing, perhaps hoping to witness Jesus' eventual downfall. Their continued presence provides Jesus with a captive audience for His own penetrating question, ensuring that His challenge to their understanding of the Messiah would be heard by the very individuals who most needed to hear it. It underscores that Jesus' actions were not in private but in the public square, directly challenging the religious establishment's authority.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 22:41, though appearing as a simple transitional verse, finds its Christ-centered fulfillment in Jesus' ultimate role as the divine Son who possesses all wisdom and authority, capable of revealing the deepest truths of God. The shift from being questioned to being the questioner perfectly illustrates the truth that Jesus is not merely a prophet or a teacher, but the very Word of God incarnate, who has come to illuminate the true nature of God and His kingdom. His strategic questioning of the Pharisees foreshadows His role as the one who exposes all human inadequacy and spiritual blindness, ultimately revealing Himself as the fulfillment of all Messianic prophecies. He is the one in whom "are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Colossians 2:3), the one through whom God has definitively spoken to humanity (Hebrews 1:1-3). This verse sets the stage for Jesus to reveal the mystery of the Messiah's dual nature – both David's Son and David's Lord – a truth that the Old Testament hinted at but was fully unveiled in the person of Jesus Christ. He is the one who perfectly "explained" God, whom no one has seen (John 1:18), and His questions, like His very life, serve to draw humanity into a deeper understanding of God's redemptive plan, culminating in His atoning work on the cross.