TRV
Study This Verse
Commentary on Leviticus 14 verses 33–53
This is the law concerning the leprosy in a house. Now that they were in the wilderness they dwelt in tents, and had no houses, and therefore the law is made only an appendix to the former laws concerning the leprosy, because it related, not to their present state, but to their future settlement. The leprosy in a house is as unaccountable as the leprosy in a garment; but, if we see not what natural causes of it can be assigned, we may resolve it into the power of the God of nature, who here says, I put the leprosy in a house (Lev 14:34), as his curse is said to enter into a house, and consume it with the timber and stones thereof, Zac 5:4. Now, 1. It is supposed that even in Canaan itself, the land of promise, their houses might be infected with a leprosy. Though it was a holy land, this would not secure them from this plague, while the inhabitants were many of them so unholy. Thus a place and a name in the visible church will not secure wicked people from God's judgments. 2. It is likewise taken for granted that the owner of the house will make the priest acquainted with it, as soon as he sees the least cause to suspect the leprosy in his house: It seemeth to me there is as it were a plague in the house, Lev 14:35. Sin, where that reigns in a house, is a plague there, as it is in a heart. And masters of families should be aware and afraid of the first appearance of gross sin in their families, and put away the iniquity, whatever it is, far from their tabernacles, Job 22:23. They should be jealous with a godly jealousy concerning those under their charge, lest they be drawn into sin, and take early advice, if it but seem that there is a plague in the house, lest the contagion spread, and many be by it defiled and destroyed. 3. If the priest, upon search, found that the leprosy had got into the house, he must try to cure it, by taking gout that part of the building that was infected, Lev 14:40, Lev 14:41. This was like cutting off a gangrened limb, for the preservation of the rest of the body. Corruption should be purged out in time, before it spread; for a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. If thy right hand offend thee, cut it off. 4. If yet it remained in the house, the whole house must be pulled down, and all the materials carried to the dunghill, Lev 14:44, Lev 14:45. The owner had better be without a dwelling than live in one that was infected. Note, The leprosy of sin, if it be obstinate under the methods of cure, will at last be the ruin of families and churches. If Babylon will not be healed, she shall be forsaken and abandoned, and (according to the law respecting the leprous house), they shall not take of her a stone for a corner, nor a stone for foundations, Jer 51:9, Jer 51:26. The remainders of sin and corruption in our mortal bodies are like this leprosy in the house; after all our pains in scraping and plastering, we shall never be quite clear of it, till the earthly house of this tabernacle be dissolved and taken down; when we are dead we shall be free from sin, and not till then, Rom 6:7. 5. If the taking out the infected stones cured the house, and the leprosy did not spread any further, then the house must be cleansed; not only aired, that it might be healthful, but purified from the ceremonial pollution, that it might be fit to be the habitation of an Israelite. The ceremony of its cleansing was much the same with that of cleansing a leprous person, Lev 14:49, etc. This intimated that the house was smitten for the man's sake (as bishop Patrick expresses it), and he was to look upon himself as preserved by divine mercy. The houses of Israelites are said to be dedicated (Deu 20:5), for they were a holy nation, and therefore they ought to keep their houses pure from all ceremonial pollutions, that they might be fit for the service of that God to whom they were devoted. And the same care should we take to reform whatever is amiss in our families, that we and our houses may serve the Lord; see Gen 35:2. Some have thought the leprosy in the house was typical of the idolatry of the Jewish church, which did strangely cleave to it; for, though some of the reforming kings took away the infected stones, yet still it broke out again, till by the captivity of Babylon God took down the house, and carried it to an unclean land; and this proved an effectual cure of their inclination to idols and idolatrous worships.
Continue studying Leviticus 14:38 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Leviticus 14:38 delineates a crucial step in the purification protocol for a house afflicted by a "plague," likely a severe manifestation of mold or mildew. Following the initial priestly examination and confirmation of the contamination, this verse mandates the immediate and stringent isolation of the dwelling for a period of seven days. This act of "shutting up" the house underscores the gravity of the defilement, initiating a vital period of observation and separation essential for determining the subsequent phases of the cleansing process and meticulously preserving the ritual purity of the Israelite community.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Leviticus 14:38 is intricately woven into the elaborate legal and ritual framework of Leviticus 14, which provides detailed, unique instructions for addressing the "plague of leprosy" (Hebrew: tzara'at) not only on individuals and garments but, distinctively, on houses. The preceding verses, specifically Leviticus 14:33-37, describe the homeowner's responsibility to report a suspected affliction to the priest, the priest's initial inspection, and the subsequent confirmation of the plague's presence. Therefore, verse 38 serves as the direct, mandated consequence of that diagnosis, initiating the critical quarantine phase. This procedure deliberately mirrors the established protocols for individuals with suspected skin diseases, where an initial inspection frequently led to a seven-day isolation period as meticulously detailed in Leviticus 13. The overarching emphasis of the chapter lies in the meticulous and comprehensive nature of God's laws concerning purity and defilement, highlighting the absolute necessity of addressing contamination to preserve the sanctity of both the community and its dwelling places.
Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, the concept of ritual purity held paramount importance, serving as a foundational pillar of their covenant relationship with Yahweh. Defilement, whether originating from disease, bodily discharges, or even contaminated objects and dwellings, rendered individuals or places ritually unfit for participation in the community's worship and daily life. The "plague" (tzara'at) on a house, while likely a severe fungal growth or mold, was not perceived merely as a physical problem but as a profound manifestation of defilement that necessitated divine intervention, mediated through the divinely instituted priestly system. Priests functioned as both spiritual and communal arbiters, uniquely responsible for diagnosing purity issues and prescribing the requisite rituals for restoration. The act of "shutting up" the house was a practical and necessary measure, akin to a modern quarantine, designed to prevent the spread of contamination. However, it also carried immense symbolic weight, formally marking the dwelling as ritually unclean and setting it apart from normal use until God's will regarding its cleansing or, if necessary, demolition could be discerned. This meticulous attention to the cleanliness of living spaces profoundly underscored the pervasive nature of God's demand for holiness, extending His divine standards even to the physical environment of His chosen people, as evidenced by broader calls for purity throughout the book of Leviticus.
Key Themes: This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. The primary theme is Holiness and Purity, emphasizing God's absolute demand for His people to reflect His own perfect holiness in every sphere of life, including their physical environment. The "plague" on the house represents an intrusion of impurity that must be meticulously dealt with to maintain the community's consecrated status. Another key theme is Divine Order and Authority, as the entire process is initiated and overseen by the priest, acting under God's explicit instructions, demonstrating that only divinely appointed methods can address defilement. The detailed procedures highlight God's meticulous care and the seriousness with which He views anything that compromises the sanctity of His people. Furthermore, the passage underscores the theme of Separation and Discernment, as the seven-day quarantine period is a time for observation and decision-making, distinguishing between what is clean and unclean, and preventing the spread of contamination. This echoes the broader principle of Israel's separation from the nations to be a holy people, as seen in passages like Leviticus 20:26.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The passage employs several literary devices to convey its profound meaning and significance. Ritual Purity serves as the overarching thematic device, as the entire chapter is meticulously dedicated to the precise procedures for maintaining a state of ritual cleanliness, which was absolutely essential for the Israelite community's covenant relationship with God. The act of "shutting up" the house is a direct and tangible manifestation of this pervasive concern, isolating the defiled to preserve the purity of the undefiled. Symbolism is also prominently featured; the "plague" on the house, whether a specific type of mold or mildew, transcends a mere physical problem to symbolize a deeper spiritual defilement that impacts the living space and, by extension, the community's holiness. The priest's actions—his exit from the house and the subsequent act of shutting it up—are not merely practical steps but are highly symbolic gestures of separation, discernment, and the initiation of a divine process. The Repetition of the seven-day period throughout Levitical law (e.g., in various other purification rites) powerfully reinforces its significance as a divinely ordained period for observation, testing, and completion, lending a profound sense of order, divine authority, and purposeful design to the entire purification process.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Leviticus 14:38 powerfully illustrates God's comprehensive and meticulous concern for the holiness of His people, a concern that extends beyond individual conduct to encompass their very living spaces. This passage profoundly reveals that defilement, whether physical or spiritual, cannot be ignored or tolerated but must be meticulously addressed through divinely appointed means. It underscores the foundational biblical principle that God desires His people to be holy in every conceivable aspect of their lives, perfectly reflecting His own transcendent holiness. The mandated isolation period serves as a tangible and potent reminder that sin and impurity, if left unchecked, possess an insidious capacity to spread and contaminate, thereby necessitating a period of separation for thorough examination and potential cleansing. This separation is not inherently punitive but profoundly redemptive, ultimately aiming for restoration to a state of purity that allows for renewed and unhindered fellowship with a holy God.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The ancient command to "shut up the house" for seven days, while rooted in a specific historical and ceremonial context, offers profound and enduring principles for contemporary spiritual life. It calls us to adopt a posture of diligent discernment regarding the "plagues" in our own lives and communities—those insidious influences, habits, or attitudes that subtly defile, diminish, and ultimately hinder our spiritual vitality. Just as the priest acted decisively to isolate the contaminated dwelling, we are challenged to courageously identify and intentionally "quarantine" areas of spiritual or moral compromise. This might entail a period of intentional separation from certain environments, relationships, or forms of media that demonstrably impede our walk with God and compromise our integrity. Such periods of "shutting up" can indeed be uncomfortable, demanding self-denial and honest introspection, but they are absolutely crucial for authentic self-examination, allowing the "plague" to be fully exposed or, by God's sovereign grace, to recede. This rigorous process is not about self-righteous judgment but about a humble yet resolute pursuit of holiness, trusting implicitly that God's comprehensive and meticulous care extends to every corner of our lives, desiring our complete restoration and purity for His glory and our ultimate good.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What exactly was the "plague" described in Leviticus 14?
Answer: While the King James Version uses the phrase "plague of leprosy," the Hebrew word tzara'at (צָרַעַת) in this context, particularly when applied to houses (and garments), is not equivalent to modern medical leprosy (Hansen's disease). Scholars generally agree that it refers to a severe, spreading fungal growth, mold, or mildew that could infest the stone or plaster of a house. It was specifically characterized by "reddish or greenish spots" (Leviticus 14:37). This "plague" was considered a profound source of ritual impurity, necessitating immediate priestly intervention and specific purification rites, or even the complete demolition of the house if the affliction proved persistent and incurable.
Why was a seven-day isolation period required for the house?
Answer: The seven-day period served as a crucial diagnostic and observational phase, a divinely mandated quarantine. It allowed the priest to meticulously re-examine the "plague" after a set duration to determine its progression: whether it had spread, remained contained, or had receded (Leviticus 14:39-42). This specific period was not arbitrary but aligns with the profound biblical significance of the number seven, which frequently denotes completion, divine order, and a period of testing or waiting before a definitive outcome. Furthermore, it served a practical purpose by preventing further contamination of the inhabitants or the broader community while the precise nature and extent of the defilement were being thoroughly assessed by the priest.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Leviticus 14:38, with its meticulous instructions for cleansing a defiled house, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate cleansing and profound purification offered exclusively through Jesus Christ. The temporary, external isolation and ritual cleansing of a physical house, performed by an earthly priest, pointed prophetically to a deeper, spiritual reality. Just as the physical "plague" rendered a dwelling uninhabitable and ritually unclean, so too does sin profoundly defile the "house" of our lives, rendering us spiritually unfit for genuine fellowship with a holy God. However, unlike the Levitical priest who could only quarantine and prescribe external rites, Jesus, our great High Priest, entered the defiled "house" of humanity, not to merely quarantine but to cleanse from within. His perfect and singular sacrifice on the cross, as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, provides a permanent, complete, and internal purification that the Old Testament rituals could only anticipate. Through His precious blood, we are not merely quarantined from sin but truly cleansed, our "house" made new and fit for the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19). He has made us holy and blameless before God, perfectly fulfilling the law's demand for absolute purity (Colossians 1:21-22). The temporary "shutting up" of the house in Leviticus finds its ultimate and glorious resolution in Christ's finished work, which opens the way for us to dwell eternally in the very presence of a perfectly holy God, in a new heavens and new earth where righteousness dwells.