Leviticus 13:26

KJV

But if the priest look on it, and, behold, [there be] no white hair in the bright spot, and it [be] no lower than the [other] skin, but [be] somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

KJV (with Strong's)

But if the priest {H3548} look {H7200} on it, and, behold, there be no white {H3836} hair {H8181} in the bright spot {H934}, and it be no lower {H8217} than the other skin {H5785}, but be somewhat dark {H3544}; then the priest {H3548} shall shut {H5462} him up seven {H7651} days {H3117}:

Complete Jewish Bible

But if the cohen examines it and sees no white hair in the bright spot, and it is no lower than the skin around it but looks faded, then the cohen is to isolate him for seven days.

Berean Standard Bible

But if the priest examines it and there is no white hair in the spot, and it is not beneath the skin but has faded, the priest shall isolate him for seven days.

American Standard Version

But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no white hair in the bright spot, and it be no lower than the skin, but be dim; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Leviticus 13:26 meticulously outlines a specific diagnostic protocol within the extensive Old Testament laws concerning *tzara'at*, a broad term encompassing various skin afflictions. This verse addresses an ambiguous case where a suspected skin lesion, a "bright spot," lacks the definitive characteristics—such as white hair or a depth below the skin surface—that would immediately declare an individual ceremonially unclean. Instead, its "somewhat dark" appearance necessitates a precautionary period of isolation for seven days, during which the priest can observe the condition's progression before rendering a final, authoritative judgment regarding the individual's purity status.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Leviticus 13 and 14 constitute a comprehensive legal and ritual manual dedicated to the diagnosis, management, and purification rites associated with *tzara'at*. This section is rigorously structured, commencing with the initial examination of a suspected affliction by the priest, as detailed in [Leviticus 13:2](/leviticus/13-2 "Leviticus 13:2 - Initial Examination of Skin Afflictions"), outlining the definitive signs of uncleanness in [Leviticus 13:3](/leviticus/13-3 "Leviticus 13:3 - Definitive Signs of Uncleanness"), and then systematically addressing various presentations, including those that are ambiguous. Leviticus 13:26 is situated within these detailed instructions, specifically focusing on a "boil" or "burn" that develops a bright spot. It represents a crucial juncture in the diagnostic process where immediate declaration of uncleanness is not warranted, thereby demanding a period of careful observation to uphold the integrity of the community's purity.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In ancient Israel, *tzara'at* (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was understood not merely as a medical ailment akin to modern Hansen's disease, but primarily as a profound state of ceremonial impurity. It was often perceived as a divine judgment, a consequence of sin, or a disruption of the individual's covenantal relationship with God and the community. The priest, functioning as both a spiritual authority and a public health official, held the critical role of discerning between clean and unclean, thereby safeguarding the holiness of the camp where God's presence resided. The strict protocols, including isolation, were designed to prevent the spread of impurity, which could defile the Tabernacle and the entire community. The "shutting up" for seven days, as prescribed in [Leviticus 13:4](/leviticus/13-4 "Leviticus 13:4 - Initial Isolation for Tzara'at") for ambiguous cases, reflected a deep emphasis on caution, communal protection, and the meticulous maintenance of ceremonial purity.
* **Key Themes:** This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of **Holiness and Purity**, emphasizing God's demand for a set-apart people who reflect His own holy character. The meticulous laws concerning *tzara'at* underscore the vital importance of maintaining ceremonial purity for the community to dwell in God's presence. Another key theme is **Divine Authority and Order**, as the priest, acting under God's explicit instructions, serves as the sole arbiter of purity, ensuring that judgments are not arbitrary but conform to divine standards. The cautious approach of "shutting up" for observation also highlights the theme of **Discernment and Prudence**, demonstrating that God's law provides for careful, unhurried judgment in ambiguous situations, balancing the need for immediate action with the wisdom of patient observation. These themes collectively reinforce the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where purity was integral to their identity and worship.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
#### Key Word Analysis
* **Priest (Hebrew, כֹּהֵן, _kôhên'_):** From H3548. The *kôhên* was not merely a religious functionary but held significant judicial and public health authority within Israelite society. In the context of *tzara'at*, the priest was the sole arbiter authorized by God to declare someone clean or unclean. This highlights the divine origin and serious implications of these laws, emphasizing that the judgment was not arbitrary but rooted in God's revealed will for His people's purity and well-being. The priest's role was to mediate God's standards of holiness to the community.
* **Bright spot (Hebrew, בֹּהֶרֶת, _bôhereth'_):** From H934. This term refers to a whitish or shiny patch on the skin, indicating a discoloration or lesion. Its initial presence was the trigger for priestly examination. In [Leviticus 13:26](/leviticus/13-26 "Leviticus 13:26 - Ambiguous Skin Lesion"), the *bôhereth* is specifically described as lacking the definitive signs of severe *tzara'at* (no white hair, not deeper than the skin), making it an ambiguous manifestation that required further scrutiny rather than immediate condemnation. It represents a potential, but not yet confirmed, state of impurity.
* **Somewhat dark (Hebrew, כֵּהֶה, _kêheh'_):** From H3544. This adjective describes the ambiguous appearance of the bright spot, indicating it is "feeble" or "obscure" in its color, not definitively white or clearly inflamed. This lack of clear coloration is precisely what prevents an immediate diagnosis of uncleanness. The "somewhat dark" nature of the spot is the key characteristic that necessitates a period of observation, as it doesn't fit the criteria for either immediate cleanness or uncleanness, demanding further time for its true nature to be revealed.
* **Shut him up (Hebrew, סָגַר, _çâgar'_):** From H5462. This verb signifies "to confine," "to isolate," or "to quarantine." It indicates a temporary separation of the individual from the community. This action was not a declaration of uncleanness but a precautionary measure, allowing time for the condition to either resolve, develop clearer symptoms, or remain ambiguous, necessitating further observation or a different course of action. It underscores the meticulous and cautious approach required in matters of purity, prioritizing communal health and holiness.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"But if the priest look on it":** This opening phrase immediately establishes the central and authoritative role of the priest in the diagnostic process. No self-diagnosis or lay judgment was permitted; only the divinely appointed priest had the authority to examine and pronounce judgment on matters of *tzara'at*, underscoring the gravity and divine mandate of these purity laws.
* **"and, behold, [there be] no white hair in the bright spot":** This is the first negative diagnostic criterion. The presence of white hair within the lesion was a definitive and severe sign of uncleanness, as stated in [Leviticus 13:3](/leviticus/13-3 "Leviticus 13:3 - Definitive Signs of Uncleanness"). Its absence in this specific case indicates that the condition is not immediately identifiable as severe *tzara'at*, thus requiring further examination rather than an immediate declaration of impurity.
* **"and it [be] no lower than the [other] skin":** This is the second negative diagnostic criterion. A lesion that appeared deeper than the surrounding skin was another clear indicator of uncleanness, suggesting a more invasive and serious affliction. Its absence, like the lack of white hair, suggests a less severe or ambiguous manifestation, preventing an immediate pronouncement of uncleanness.
* **"but [be] somewhat dark":** This positive description of the lesion's appearance indicates its ambiguous nature. It's not definitively white (which could be a sign of healing or a benign condition) nor is it clearly red or raw, which might suggest a different type of affliction. The "somewhat dark" nature is the key characteristic that necessitates further observation, as it falls into a grey area of diagnosis.
* **"then the priest shall shut him up seven days":** This is the prescribed action for an ambiguous case. The individual is placed in temporary quarantine. This period of isolation serves a dual purpose: to protect the community from potential contagion (physical or ceremonial) and to allow the condition to either progress to a clear diagnosis (clean or unclean) or to recede, leading to a declaration of cleanness. It demonstrates the law's prudence and patience.

#### Literary Devices
Leviticus 13:26 employs several literary devices to convey its precise instructions. The most prominent device is the **Conditional Clause** ("But if... then..."), which is a hallmark of legal and instructional texts throughout the Old Testament. This structure clearly links a specific set of observed conditions to a prescribed action, leaving no room for misinterpretation regarding the priest's duties and the expected outcome. The meticulous detail in describing the visual cues (no white hair, not lower than the skin, somewhat dark) demonstrates the **Precision** and **Specificity** inherent in the Law, ensuring that judgments are based on objective, observable criteria rather than subjective interpretation or arbitrary decision-making. There is also an element of **Repetition** of diagnostic criteria throughout Leviticus 13, reinforcing the importance of these specific signs for accurate discernment. Furthermore, the entire *tzara'at* narrative carries significant **Symbolism**, where physical purity reflects spiritual holiness, and the act of "shutting up" symbolizes the necessary separation from impurity to maintain the sanctity and well-being of the community in God's presence.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Leviticus 13:26, while detailing ancient health and purity laws, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous concern for holiness, order, and the well-being of His covenant people. It highlights the divine principle of careful discernment: not every anomaly immediately leads to condemnation or exclusion. God's law provides for a period of observation and patience when clarity is lacking, emphasizing prudence over hasty judgment. This process underscores the importance of protecting the community from defilement, whether physical or spiritual, and maintaining the sacred space where God dwells among His people. It reveals a divine wisdom that balances justice with mercy, providing a path for re-integration if the condition proves benign, while upholding the absolute necessity of purity for a people called to reflect God's own holiness.

* [Deuteronomy 17:8-11](/deuteronomy/17-8-11 "Deuteronomy 17:8-11 - Difficult Cases for Priestly Judgment")
* [1 Corinthians 5:6-7](/1_corinthians/5-6-7 "1 Corinthians 5:6-7 - Leaven and Purity")
* [Hebrews 12:14](/hebrews/12-14 "Hebrews 12:14 - Pursuit of Holiness")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The detailed instructions in Leviticus 13:26 offer timeless principles for spiritual discernment and communal health within the body of Christ today. Just as the priest carefully observed a physical condition, we are called to exercise prudence, patience, and careful observation in judging situations, discerning the spiritual state of others, or even evaluating our own hearts. Not every "bright spot" or ambiguous spiritual manifestation in our lives or in the lives of others is immediately indicative of deep-seated sin or spiritual sickness; sometimes, a period of prayerful observation, humble self-examination, or seeking wise, godly counsel is necessary before making a definitive judgment. The concept of "shutting up" for seven days can be spiritually applied as a call to temporary separation for focused reflection, repentance, or protection from harmful influences. This might involve a season of spiritual retreat, a deliberate distancing from toxic relationships or worldly distractions, or a focused period of self-assessment to prevent spiritual "contagion" from spreading within our own hearts or the broader community of faith. Ultimately, this passage reminds us that God desires both our individual purity and the collective holiness of His people, and He provides clear pathways for achieving both through careful discernment and disciplined living in accordance with His Word.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does the priest's cautious approach in Leviticus 13:26 inform our own tendency to make hasty judgments about others or situations, particularly in a spiritual context?**
* **In what areas of your life might a period of "shutting yourself up" (i.e., spiritual retreat, self-examination, or temporary separation) be beneficial for clarity, purity, or protection from spiritual harm?**
* **Who are the "priests" or trusted spiritual counselors in your life whose discernment you should seek when facing ambiguous spiritual or ethical dilemmas, and how do you practice humble submission to their godly counsel?**

### FAQ
**What was *tzara'at*, and why was it so significant in ancient Israel?**

Answer: *Tzara'at* (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was a broad term used in ancient Israel to describe various skin conditions, and even mildew or mold on clothing and houses. It was not solely what we know today as Hansen's disease (leprosy). Its significance was primarily ceremonial and theological, rather than purely medical. An individual afflicted with *tzara'at* was considered ritually unclean, separated from the community and the Tabernacle/Temple, symbolizing a profound disruption of their relationship with God and the community. The meticulous laws in [Leviticus 13-14](/leviticus/13 "Leviticus 13 - Laws Concerning Tzara'at") underscore the profound importance of purity for maintaining God's holy presence within the camp of Israel.

**Why was the period of observation specifically "seven days"?**

Answer: The number seven holds immense theological significance in the Bible, often symbolizing completeness, perfection, and divine order. It is frequently associated with cycles of purification, creation, and covenant. For example, the creation account is completed in [seven days](/genesis/1 "Genesis 1 - The Creation Account"), and various purification rituals involve a seven-day period (e.g., [Leviticus 12:2](/leviticus/12-2 "Leviticus 12:2 - Purification after Childbirth") for a woman after childbirth). In the context of *tzara'at*, the seven-day isolation period allowed sufficient time for the condition to either manifest more definitive symptoms, begin to heal, or remain unchanged, providing the priest with a clear basis for a final declaration of clean or unclean. It was a divinely ordained period for thorough observation and discernment, reflecting God's perfect order.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Leviticus 13:26, with its meticulous diagnostic process and the priest's essential role in discerning purity, finds its ultimate fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament priest could only diagnose and separate, acting as a gatekeeper of purity, but Jesus, as our Great High Priest, not only discerns with perfect wisdom but also cleanses with divine authority. He perfectly embodies the discernment required, seeing beyond external appearances to the true condition of the heart, as He demonstrated when He healed those afflicted with *tzara'at* in the Gospels, touching the untouchable and making them clean ([Matthew 8:1-4](/matthew/8-1-4 "Matthew 8:1-4 - Jesus Heals a Leper")). Unlike the earthly priest who could only declare a person unclean and shut them out, Jesus' touch brought immediate restoration and reintegration into community. Furthermore, the temporary isolation for physical *tzara'at* powerfully foreshadows the ultimate spiritual separation caused by sin, which alienates humanity from a holy God. Jesus, the spotless [Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world](/john/1-29 "John 1:29 - Jesus, the Lamb of God"), bore our uncleanness on the cross, making it possible for us to be truly purified and reconciled to God. Through His perfect sacrifice, He fulfilled all the ceremonial laws, offering a perfect and permanent cleansing that the Old Testament rituals could only point towards, allowing us to draw near to God with confidence, as our compassionate High Priest sympathizes with our weaknesses ([Hebrews 4:14-16](/hebrews/4-14-16 "Hebrews 4:14-16 - Jesus Our High Priest")).

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Leviticus 13:23

But if the bright spot stay in his place, [and] spread not, it [is] a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

Leviticus 13:4

If the bright spot [be] white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight [be] not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up [him that hath] the plague seven days:

Leviticus 13:5

And the priest shall look on him the seventh day: and, behold, [if] the plague in his sight be at a stay, [and] the plague spread not in the skin; then the priest shall shut him up seven days more: