What number verse is Leviticus 13:26 in the Bible?

Leviticus 13:26 is the 3,079th verse of the Bible. Counting straight through the King James canon — all 31,102 verses from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 — Leviticus 13:26 sits at position 3,079.

13:2513:25

Leviticus 13:26

Q: What was *tzara'at*, and why was it so significant in ancient Israel?

*Tzara'at* (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was a broad term used in ancient Israel to describe various skin conditions, and even mildew or mold on clothing and houses. It was not solely what we know today as Hansen's disease (leprosy). Its significance was primarily ceremonial and theological, rather than purely medical. An individual afflicted with *tzara'at* was considered ritually unclean, separated from the community and the Tabernacle/Temple, symbolizing a profound disruption of their relationship with God and the community. The meticulous laws in Leviticus 13-14 underscore the profound importance of purity for maintaining God's holy presence within the camp of Israel.

13:2713:27

Translation

King James Version

But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no white hair in the bright spot, and it be no lower than the other skin, but be somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

Ask

KJV (with Strong's)

But if the priest ^H3548 look ^H7200 on it, and, behold, there be no white ^H3836 hair ^H8181 in the bright spot ^H934, and it be no lower ^H8217 than the other skin ^H5785, but be somewhat dark ^H3544; then the priest ^H3548 shall shut ^H5462 him up seven ^H7651 days ^H3117:

Ask

Complete Jewish Bible

But if the cohen examines it and sees no white hair in the bright spot, and it is no lower than the skin around it but looks faded, then the cohen is to isolate him for seven days.

Ask

Berean Standard Bible

But if the priest examines it and there is no white hair in the spot, and it is not beneath the skin but has faded, the priest shall isolate him for seven days.

Ask

American Standard Version

But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no white hair in the bright spot, and it be no lower than the skin, but be dim; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

Ask

World English Bible Messianic

But if the priest examines it, and behold, there is no white hair in the bright spot, and it isn’t lower than the skin, but is faded; then the priest shall isolate him seven days.

Ask

Geneva Bible (1599)

But if the Priest looke on it, and there be no white heare in the spot, and be no lower then the other skinne, but be darker, then the Priest shall shut him vp seuen dayes.

Ask

Young's Literal Translation

`And if the priest see it, and lo, there is no white hair on the bright spot, and it is not lower than the skin, and it is become weak, then the priest hath shut him up seven days;

Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 13:26 meticulously outlines a specific diagnostic protocol within the extensive Old Testament laws concerning tzara'at, a broad term encompassing various skin afflictions. This verse addresses an ambiguous case where a suspected skin lesion, a "bright spot," lacks the definitive characteristics—such as white hair or a depth below the skin surface—that would immediately declare an individual ceremonially unclean. Instead, its "somewhat dark" appearance necessitates a precautionary period of isolation for seven days, during which the priest can observe the condition's progression before rendering a final, authoritative judgment regarding the individual's purity status.

CONTEXT

Literary Context: Leviticus 13 and 14 constitute a comprehensive legal and ritual manual dedicated to the diagnosis, management, and purification rites associated with tzara'at. This section is rigorously structured, commencing with the initial examination of a suspected affliction by the priest, as detailed in Leviticus 13:2, outlining the definitive signs of uncleanness in Leviticus 13:3, and then systematically addressing various presentations, including those that are ambiguous. Leviticus 13:26 is situated within these detailed instructions, specifically focusing on a "boil" or "burn" that develops a bright spot. It represents a crucial juncture in the diagnostic process where immediate declaration of uncleanness is not warranted, thereby demanding a period of careful observation to uphold the integrity of the community's purity.
Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, tzara'at (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was understood not merely as a medical ailment akin to modern Hansen's disease, but primarily as a profound state of ceremonial impurity. It was often perceived as a divine judgment, a consequence of sin, or a disruption of the individual's covenantal relationship with God and the community. The priest, functioning as both a spiritual authority and a public health official, held the critical role of discerning between clean and unclean, thereby safeguarding the holiness of the camp where God's presence resided. The strict protocols, including isolation, were designed to prevent the spread of impurity, which could defile the Tabernacle and the entire community. The "shutting up" for seven days, as prescribed in Leviticus 13:4 for ambiguous cases, reflected a deep emphasis on caution, communal protection, and the meticulous maintenance of ceremonial purity.
Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Holiness and Purity, emphasizing God's demand for a set-apart people who reflect His own holy character. The meticulous laws concerning tzara'at underscore the vital importance of maintaining ceremonial purity for the community to dwell in God's presence. Another key theme is Divine Authority and Order, as the priest, acting under God's explicit instructions, serves as the sole arbiter of purity, ensuring that judgments are not arbitrary but conform to divine standards. The cautious approach of "shutting up" for observation also highlights the theme of Discernment and Prudence, demonstrating that God's law provides for careful, unhurried judgment in ambiguous situations, balancing the need for immediate action with the wisdom of patient observation. These themes collectively reinforce the covenant relationship between God and Israel, where purity was integral to their identity and worship.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

Priest (Hebrew, כֹּהֵן, kôhên', H3548): The kôhên was not merely a religious functionary but held significant judicial and public health authority within Israelite society. In the context of tzara'at, the priest was the sole arbiter authorized by God to declare someone clean or unclean. This highlights the divine origin and serious implications of these laws, emphasizing that the judgment was not arbitrary but rooted in God's revealed will for His people's purity and well-being. The priest's role was to mediate God's standards of holiness to the community.
Bright spot (Hebrew, בֹּהֶרֶת, bôhereth', H934): This term refers to a whitish or shiny patch on the skin, indicating a discoloration or lesion. Its initial presence was the trigger for priestly examination. In Leviticus 13:26, the bôhereth is specifically described as lacking the definitive signs of severe tzara'at (no white hair, not deeper than the skin), making it an ambiguous manifestation that required further scrutiny rather than immediate condemnation. It represents a potential, but not yet confirmed, state of impurity.
Somewhat dark (Hebrew, כֵּהֶה, kêheh', H3544): This adjective describes the ambiguous appearance of the bright spot, indicating it is "feeble" or "obscure" in its color, not definitively white or clearly inflamed. This lack of clear coloration is precisely what prevents an immediate diagnosis of uncleanness. The "somewhat dark" nature of the spot is the key characteristic that necessitates a period of observation, as it doesn't fit the criteria for either immediate cleanness or uncleanness, demanding further time for its true nature to be revealed.
Shut him up (Hebrew, סָגַר, çâgar', H5462): This verb signifies "to confine," "to isolate," or "to quarantine." It indicates a temporary separation of the individual from the community. This action was not a declaration of uncleanness but a precautionary measure, allowing time for the condition to either resolve, develop clearer symptoms, or remain ambiguous, necessitating further observation or a different course of action. It underscores the meticulous and cautious approach required in matters of purity, prioritizing communal health and holiness.

Verse Breakdown

"But if the priest look on it": This opening phrase immediately establishes the central and authoritative role of the priest in the diagnostic process. No self-diagnosis or lay judgment was permitted; only the divinely appointed priest had the authority to examine and pronounce judgment on matters of tzara'at, underscoring the gravity and divine mandate of these purity laws.
"and, behold, [there be] no white hair in the bright spot": This is the first negative diagnostic criterion. The presence of white hair within the lesion was a definitive and severe sign of uncleanness, as stated in Leviticus 13:3. Its absence in this specific case indicates that the condition is not immediately identifiable as severe tzara'at, thus requiring further examination rather than an immediate declaration of impurity.
"and it [be] no lower than the [other] skin": This is the second negative diagnostic criterion. A lesion that appeared deeper than the surrounding skin was another clear indicator of uncleanness, suggesting a more invasive and serious affliction. Its absence, like the lack of white hair, suggests a less severe or ambiguous manifestation, preventing an immediate pronouncement of uncleanness.
"but [be] somewhat dark": This positive description of the lesion's appearance indicates its ambiguous nature. It's not definitively white (which could be a sign of healing or a benign condition) nor is it clearly red or raw, which might suggest a different type of affliction. The "somewhat dark" nature is the key characteristic that necessitates further observation, as it falls into a grey area of diagnosis.
"then the priest shall shut him up seven days": This is the prescribed action for an ambiguous case. The individual is placed in temporary quarantine. This period of isolation serves a dual purpose: to protect the community from potential contagion (physical or ceremonial) and to allow the condition to either progress to a clear diagnosis (clean or unclean) or to recede, leading to a declaration of cleanness. It demonstrates the law's prudence and patience.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 13:26 employs several literary devices to convey its precise instructions. The most prominent device is the Conditional Clause ("But if... then..."), which is a hallmark of legal and instructional texts throughout the Old Testament. This structure clearly links a specific set of observed conditions to a prescribed action, leaving no room for misinterpretation regarding the priest's duties and the expected outcome. The meticulous detail in describing the visual cues (no white hair, not lower than the skin, somewhat dark) demonstrates the Precision and Specificity inherent in the Law, ensuring that judgments are based on objective, observable criteria rather than subjective interpretation or arbitrary decision-making. There is also an element of Repetition of diagnostic criteria throughout Leviticus 13, reinforcing the importance of these specific signs for accurate discernment. Furthermore, the entire tzara'at narrative carries significant Symbolism, where physical purity reflects spiritual holiness, and the act of "shutting up" symbolizes the necessary separation from impurity to maintain the sanctity and well-being of the community in God's presence.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 13:26, while detailing ancient health and purity laws, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous concern for holiness, order, and the well-being of His covenant people. It highlights the divine principle of careful discernment: not every anomaly immediately leads to condemnation or exclusion. God's law provides for a period of observation and patience when clarity is lacking, emphasizing prudence over hasty judgment. This process underscores the importance of protecting the community from defilement, whether physical or spiritual, and maintaining the sacred space where God dwells among His people. It reveals a divine wisdom that balances justice with mercy, providing a path for re-integration if the condition proves benign, while upholding the absolute necessity of purity for a people called to reflect God's own holiness.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed instructions in Leviticus 13:26 offer timeless principles for spiritual discernment and communal health within the body of Christ today. Just as the priest carefully observed a physical condition, we are called to exercise prudence, patience, and careful observation in judging situations, discerning the spiritual state of others, or even evaluating our own hearts. Not every "bright spot" or ambiguous spiritual manifestation in our lives or in the lives of others is immediately indicative of deep-seated sin or spiritual sickness; sometimes, a period of prayerful observation, humble self-examination, or seeking wise, godly counsel is necessary before making a definitive judgment. The concept of "shutting up" for seven days can be spiritually applied as a call to temporary separation for focused reflection, repentance, or protection from harmful influences. This might involve a season of spiritual retreat, a deliberate distancing from toxic relationships or worldly distractions, or a focused period of self-assessment to prevent spiritual "contagion" from spreading within our own hearts or the broader community of faith. Ultimately, this passage reminds us that God desires both our individual purity and the collective holiness of His people, and He provides clear pathways for achieving both through careful discernment and disciplined living in accordance with His Word.

Questions for Reflection

How does the priest's cautious approach in Leviticus 13:26 inform our own tendency to make hasty judgments about others or situations, particularly in a spiritual context?
In what areas of your life might a period of "shutting yourself up" (i.e., spiritual retreat, self-examination, or temporary separation) be beneficial for clarity, purity, or protection from spiritual harm?
Who are the "priests" or trusted spiritual counselors in your life whose discernment you should seek when facing ambiguous spiritual or ethical dilemmas, and how do you practice humble submission to their godly counsel?

FAQ

What was tzara'at, and why was it so significant in ancient Israel?

Answer: Tzara'at (Hebrew: צָרַעַת) was a broad term used in ancient Israel to describe various skin conditions, and even mildew or mold on clothing and houses. It was not solely what we know today as Hansen's disease (leprosy). Its significance was primarily ceremonial and theological, rather than purely medical. An individual afflicted with tzara'at was considered ritually unclean, separated from the community and the Tabernacle/Temple, symbolizing a profound disruption of their relationship with God and the community. The meticulous laws in Leviticus 13-14 underscore the profound importance of purity for maintaining God's holy presence within the camp of Israel.

Why was the period of observation specifically "seven days"?

Answer: The number seven holds immense theological significance in the Bible, often symbolizing completeness, perfection, and divine order. It is frequently associated with cycles of purification, creation, and covenant. For example, the creation account is completed in seven days, and various purification rituals involve a seven-day period (e.g., Leviticus 12:2 for a woman after childbirth). In the context of tzara'at, the seven-day isolation period allowed sufficient time for the condition to either manifest more definitive symptoms, begin to heal, or remain unchanged, providing the priest with a clear basis for a final declaration of clean or unclean. It was a divinely ordained period for thorough observation and discernment, reflecting God's perfect order.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Leviticus 13:26, with its meticulous diagnostic process and the priest's essential role in discerning purity, finds its ultimate fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament priest could only diagnose and separate, acting as a gatekeeper of purity, but Jesus, as our Great High Priest, not only discerns with perfect wisdom but also cleanses with divine authority. He perfectly embodies the discernment required, seeing beyond external appearances to the true condition of the heart, as He demonstrated when He healed those afflicted with tzara'at in the Gospels, touching the untouchable and making them clean (Matthew 8:1-4). Unlike the earthly priest who could only declare a person unclean and shut them out, Jesus' touch brought immediate restoration and reintegration into community. Furthermore, the temporary isolation for physical tzara'at powerfully foreshadows the ultimate spiritual separation caused by sin, which alienates humanity from a holy God. Jesus, the spotless Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, bore our uncleanness on the cross, making it possible for us to be truly purified and reconciled to God. Through His perfect sacrifice, He fulfilled all the ceremonial laws, offering a perfect and permanent cleansing that the Old Testament rituals could only point towards, allowing us to draw near to God with confidence, as our compassionate High Priest sympathizes with our weaknesses (Hebrews 4:14-16).

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 13 verses 18–37

18 ¶ The flesh also, in which, even in the skin thereof, was a boil, and is healed,

19 And in the place of the boil there be a white rising, or a bright spot, white, and somewhat reddish, and it be shewed to the priest;

20 And if, when the priest seeth it, behold, it be in sight lower than the skin, and the hair thereof be turned white; the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a plague of leprosy broken out of the boil.

21 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no white hairs therein, and if it be not lower than the skin, but be somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

22 And if it spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a plague.

23 But if the bright spot stay in his place, and spread not, it is a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

24 Or if there be any flesh, in the skin whereof there is a hot burning, and the quick flesh that burneth have a white bright spot, somewhat reddish, or white;

25 Then the priest shall look upon it: and, behold, if the hair in the bright spot be turned white, and it be in sight deeper than the skin; it is a leprosy broken out of the burning: wherefore the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is the plague of leprosy.

26 But if the priest look on it, and, behold, there be no white hair in the bright spot, and it be no lower than the other skin, but be somewhat dark; then the priest shall shut him up seven days:

27 And the priest shall look upon him the seventh day: and if it be spread much abroad in the skin, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is the plague of leprosy.

28 And if the bright spot stay in his place, and spread not in the skin, but it be somewhat dark; it is a rising of the burning, and the priest shall pronounce him clean: for it is an inflammation of the burning.

29 If a man or woman have a plague upon the head or the beard;

30 Then the priest shall see the plague: and, behold, if it be in sight deeper than the skin; and there be in it a yellow thin hair; then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is a dry scall, even a leprosy upon the head or beard.

31 And if the priest look on the plague of the scall, and, behold, it be not in sight deeper than the skin, and that there is no black hair in it; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague of the scall seven days:

32 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the plague: and, behold, if the scall spread not, and there be in it no yellow hair, and the scall be not in sight deeper than the skin;

33 He shall be shaven, but the scall shall he not shave; and the priest shall shut up him that hath the scall seven days more:

34 And in the seventh day the priest shall look on the scall: and, behold, if the scall be not spread in the skin, nor be in sight deeper than the skin; then the priest shall pronounce him clean: and he shall wash his clothes, and be clean.

35 But if the scall spread much in the skin after his cleansing;

36 Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scall be spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; he is unclean.

37 But if the scall be in his sight at a stay, and that there is black hair grown up therein; the scall is healed, he is clean: and the priest shall pronounce him clean.

The priest is here instructed what judgment to make if there was any appearance of a leprosy, either, 1. In an old ulcer, or bile, that has been healed, Lev 13:18, etc. When old sores, that seemed to be cured, break out again, it is to be feared there is a leprosy in them; such is the danger of those who, having escaped the pollutions of the world, are again entangled therein and overcome. Or, 2. In a burn by accident, for this seems to be meant, Lev 13:24, etc. The burning of strife and contention often proves the occasion of the rising up and breaking out of that corruption which witnesses to men's faces that they are unclean. 3. In a scall-head. And in this commonly the judgment turned upon a very small matter. If the hair in the scall was black, it was a sign of soundness; if yellow, it was an indication of a leprosy, Lev 13:30-37. The other rules in these cases are the same with those mentioned before. In reading of these several sorts of ailments, it will be good for us, 1. To lament the calamitous state of human life, which lies exposed to so many grievances. What troops of diseases are we beset with on every side! and they all entered by sin. 2. To give thanks to God if he has never afflicted us with any of these sores: if the constitution is healthful, and the body lively and easy, we are bound to glorify God with our bodies.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 18–37. Public domain.

Copy as

Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 13:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Cross-References

Leviticus 13:23
But if the bright spot stay in his place, and spread not, it is a burning boil; and the priest shall pronounce him clean.
Leviticus 13:4
If the bright spot be white in the skin of his flesh, and in sight be not deeper than the skin, and the hair thereof be not turned white; then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days:
Leviticus 13:5
And the priest shall look on him the seventh day: and, behold, if the plague in his sight be at a stay, and the plague spread not in the skin; then the priest shall shut him up seven days more: