Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And as troops of robbers wait for a man, so the company of priests murder in the way by consent: for they commit lewdness.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And as troops H1416 of robbers wait H2442 for a man H376, so the company H2267 of priests H3548 murder H7523 in the way H1870 by consent H7926 H7927: for they commit H6213 lewdness H2154.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
just as bands of robbers wait to ambush someone, so does a gang of cohanim. They commit murder on the road to Sh'khem! Their conduct is an outrage!
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Like raiders who lie in ambush, so does a band of priests; they murder on the way to Shechem; surely they have committed atrocities.
Ask
American Standard Version
And as troops of robbers wait for a man, so the company of priests murder in the way toward Shechem; yea, they have committed lewdness.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
As gangs of robbers wait to ambush a man, so the company of priests murder on the path toward Shechem, committing shameful crimes.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And as the eues waite for a man, so the companie of Priestes murder in the way by consent: for they worke mischiefe.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And as bands do wait for a man, A company of priests do murder--the way to Shechem, For wickedness they have done.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Hosea 6:9 delivers a searing indictment against the priestly class in Israel, portraying them not as spiritual guides but as violent criminals. The prophet starkly compares their collective, premeditated acts of "murder" and "lewdness" along the common roads to the ambush tactics of robber gangs, highlighting the profound corruption and moral depravity that had permeated the very heart of the nation's spiritual leadership. This verse underscores the devastating consequences when those entrusted with divine truth become agents of wickedness, leading the people further into sin and judgment.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Hosea 6 continues the prophet's impassioned plea for Israel to return to Yahweh, juxtaposing God's unwavering desire for covenant faithfulness with Israel's persistent spiritual harlotry. The preceding verses (Hosea 6:1-3) express a superficial desire for return, which God immediately exposes as fleeting and insincere (Hosea 6:4-5). Crucially, Hosea 6:6 articulates God's core demand: "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings." This verse sets the stage for the condemnation in 6:9, revealing that the priests, who were supposed to embody and teach this "knowledge of God" and practice "mercy," were instead engaged in the very opposite. Their actions, described as "transgressing the covenant" like Adam (Hosea 6:7) and being stained with blood (Hosea 6:8), directly lead into the specific accusation against the priests in 6:9, demonstrating their central role in the nation's pervasive sin.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Hosea prophesied to the Northern Kingdom of Israel (Ephraim) during a period of significant political instability and moral decay, roughly from the mid-8th century BCE. After the death of Jeroboam II, a succession of kings ruled briefly, often through assassinations, leading to widespread chaos. Spiritually, the nation had long abandoned the Mosaic covenant, engaging in syncretistic worship, blending Yahwism with Baal worship, and adopting Canaanite fertility cult practices. The priests, originally appointed to uphold the Law, offer sacrifices, and teach the people, had become deeply compromised. They were often complicit in, or even leading, the idolatrous practices and social injustices that characterized the era. The phrase "in the way" (Hebrew: baderekh) likely refers to the roads leading to cultic sites or even inter-city routes, implying that their wicked deeds were not hidden but openly committed, affecting the daily lives and spiritual journeys of the common people.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Hosea. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Corrupt Leadership, specifically targeting the priests who, as spiritual custodians, had utterly failed in their duty, becoming agents of destruction rather than guidance. Their actions directly contradict God's desire for "knowledge of God" and "mercy" as stated in Hosea 6:6. Secondly, the verse emphasizes Systemic Depravity, showing that sin was not isolated but pervasive, reaching even the most sacred institutions. The phrase "by consent" suggests a collective, organized wickedness among the priestly class. Thirdly, the comparison to "troops of robbers" and the act of "murder" underscores the theme of Spiritual and Moral Violence. The priests' neglect and active sin were not merely passive failures but actively destructive, leading the people away from God and effectively "murdering" their spiritual vitality, echoing the warning in Hosea 4:6 about destruction due to lack of knowledge. Finally, the mention of "lewdness" ties into Hosea's broader theme of Spiritual Harlotry and Idolatry, portraying Israel's unfaithfulness as a gross violation of their covenant marriage to Yahweh.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • troops (Hebrew, gᵉdûwd', H1416): From the root meaning "to cut" or "to gather," this word refers to a crowd, specifically a military band or a company of raiders/robbers. Its use here immediately conjures an image of organized, predatory violence, setting the tone for the comparison to the priests. It implies a deliberate, collective action, not random individual acts.
  • priests (Hebrew, kôhên', H3548): This term denotes one who officiates in sacred rites, a priest. In ancient Israel, priests were Levites appointed to mediate between God and the people, offer sacrifices, teach the Law, and discern God's will. The prophet's application of "murder" and "lewdness" to this sacred office highlights the profound irony and tragic reversal of their divinely appointed role.
  • murder (Hebrew, râtsach', H7523): This is a strong verb, specifically referring to the unlawful killing of a human being, often premeditated or malicious, as prohibited by the Sixth Commandment (Exodus 20:13). Its use here is shocking, implying that the priests' actions were not merely negligent but actively destructive, leading to spiritual or even physical demise for those they were meant to guide.
  • lewdness (Hebrew, zimmâh', H2154): This term signifies a plan, especially a bad one, encompassing heinous crime, depravity, wickedness, and often specifically refers to sexual immorality, prostitution, and idolatrous practices. Its presence here indicates that the priests were involved in the very moral and spiritual corruption that characterized Israel's unfaithfulness to God, blurring the lines between the sacred and the profane.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And as troops of robbers wait for a man,": This opening clause establishes a vivid simile, likening the priests' actions to the predatory behavior of organized gangs of robbers. The image is one of ambush, where a group lies in wait along a common path, ready to attack an unsuspecting individual. This sets up the shocking comparison that follows, implying premeditation and a collective, organized intent to harm.
  • "so the company of priests murder in the way by consent:": Here, the comparison is made explicit and devastating. The "company of priests" (Hebrew: cheber kôhênîm, implying a society or league of priests) are accused of "murder." This "murder" is committed "in the way" (Hebrew: baderekh), meaning along the public roads or paths, suggesting their wickedness was overt and affected the daily lives of the people. The phrase "by consent" (Hebrew: shᵉkem echad, literally "one shoulder" or "one accord") emphasizes their collective agreement and unified purpose in their nefarious deeds, indicating systemic corruption rather than isolated incidents.
  • "for they commit lewdness.": This final clause provides the reason or explanation for their murderous actions. The "lewdness" (Hebrew: zimmâh) they commit encompasses a range of heinous immoralities, often including sexual depravity and idolatry. This "lewdness" is not just a personal failing but a deliberate act that leads to the spiritual (and possibly physical) destruction of the people, effectively "murdering" their spiritual vitality and leading them astray from God's covenant.

Literary Devices

Hosea 6:9 is rich with powerful literary devices that amplify its message of condemnation. The most prominent is Simile, explicitly stated with "And as... so." The priests are directly compared to "troops of robbers," immediately evoking images of violence, betrayal, and exploitation. This comparison is a form of Invective, a harsh and direct accusation, designed to shock the audience by equating sacred office-holders with common criminals. There is also profound Irony at play: those who were meant to be guardians of the Law and spiritual guides are instead depicted as its most egregious violators, leading the people into the very sins they were meant to prevent. The phrase "murder in the way" can be seen as a form of Hyperbole, emphasizing the extreme spiritual and moral damage inflicted by the priests, suggesting their actions were as destructive as literal homicide, even if not always physically so. The phrase "by consent" uses Synecdoche, where "shoulder" (part of the body, shᵉkem) represents the whole of their collective agreement and unified action.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Hosea 6:9 serves as a stark warning about the profound dangers of corrupt spiritual leadership, illustrating how a compromised priesthood can lead an entire nation astray. The priests, meant to be mediators of God's truth and upholders of the covenant, had become agents of destruction, demonstrating a tragic reversal of their divine mandate. Their "murder" and "lewdness" were not merely personal sins but systemic failures that actively undermined the spiritual health of Israel, proving that outward religious ritual is meaningless without inward righteousness and integrity. This passage underscores the biblical principle that those in positions of spiritual authority bear a greater responsibility, as their actions have far-reaching consequences for the flock they are meant to shepherd.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Hosea 6:9 is a sobering mirror for all who claim spiritual leadership, or indeed, for any believer seeking to live faithfully. It challenges us to examine the integrity of our own lives and the lives of those we follow. When spiritual guides prioritize personal gain, power, or worldly desires over divine truth and the well-being of the flock, they become stumbling blocks rather than signposts to God. This verse calls us to a rigorous discernment of teaching and practice, urging us to hold leaders accountable to biblical standards of righteousness and compassion. For individual believers, it serves as a powerful reminder that true faith is not merely about outward religious observance but about inward transformation that leads to righteous living and genuine love for God and neighbor. It compels us to ask: Are our actions building up or tearing down? Are we leading others closer to God or away from Him? The spiritual health of a community is profoundly shaped by the integrity of its members, especially its leaders.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the comparison of priests to "troops of robbers" challenge our understanding of spiritual leadership today?
  • In what ways might "murder in the way" manifest in contemporary spiritual contexts, even if not literal physical violence?
  • What does "by consent" imply about the nature of corruption within a community, and how can we guard against such collective depravity?
  • How can individual believers exercise discernment and hold spiritual leaders accountable in a way that is both biblical and loving?
  • What forms of "lewdness" (moral depravity or spiritual unfaithfulness) might be present in our own lives or communities that need to be confessed and repented of?

FAQ

What does "murder in the way by consent" truly mean in this context?

Answer: This phrase highlights the profound and systemic corruption of the Israelite priests. "Murder" (Hebrew: râtsach) here signifies not necessarily literal physical killing, though that might have occurred, but primarily a spiritual and moral destruction. The priests, by abandoning their God-given role to teach and uphold the Law, and by actively participating in or condoning idolatry and social injustice (the "lewdness"), were effectively "murdering" the spiritual lives of the people. They led them away from God, causing them to stumble and fall into sin, which ultimately led to national judgment and destruction. "In the way" (Hebrew: baderekh) suggests these acts were committed along common paths or public routes, implying their corruption was overt and impacted the daily lives of ordinary people. "By consent" (Hebrew: shᵉkem echad, literally "one shoulder" or "one accord") emphasizes that this was not isolated behavior but a collective, organized, and agreed-upon pattern of wickedness among the priestly class, indicating deep-seated institutional depravity. It underscores that their actions were deliberate and unified, much like a gang of robbers working together to ambush their victims. This collective agreement made their sin all the more grievous in God's eyes, as it reflected a pervasive betrayal of their sacred trust.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hosea 6:9, with its scathing indictment of Israel's corrupt priests, powerfully foreshadows the need for a perfect High Priest and Shepherd who would not lead His flock astray but would lay down His life for them. The priests of Hosea's day, who were meant to mediate God's presence and teach His ways, instead became "troops of robbers" who "murdered" and committed "lewdness," leading the people into spiritual death. This stark failure highlights the inadequacy of the Old Covenant priesthood and points to the ultimate fulfillment found in Jesus Christ. Unlike the corrupt priests, Jesus is the Good Shepherd who truly cares for His sheep, protecting them from spiritual harm and leading them to abundant life. He is also our Great High Priest, holy, blameless, unstained by sin, and separate from sinners, who offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice for sin, unlike the repeated, insufficient sacrifices offered by the Old Testament priests (Hebrews 7:26-27). Where the priests of Hosea's time committed "lewdness" and led to spiritual "murder," Christ, through His perfect life, atoning death, and resurrection, provides true righteousness and eternal life, rescuing humanity from the very spiritual death that corrupt leadership inflicted. He is the righteous King and Priest who perfectly fulfills God's desire for "mercy, and the knowledge of God" (Hosea 6:6), leading His people in the "way" of truth and life, rather than ambushing them with depravity.

Copy as

Commentary on Hosea 6 verses 4–11

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Two things, two evil things, both Judah and Ephraim are here charged with, and justly accused of: -

I. That they were not firm to their own convictions, but were unsteady, unstable as water, Hos 6:4, Hos 6:5. O Ephraim! what shall I do unto thee? O Judah! what shall I do unto thee? This is a strange expression. Can Infinite Wisdom be at a loss what to do? Can it be nonplussed, or put upon taking new measures? By no means; but God speaks after the manner of men, to show how absurd and unreasonable they were, and how just his proceedings against them were. Let them not complain of him as harsh and severe in tearing them, and smiting them, as he has done; for what else should he do? What other course could he take with them? God had tried various methods with them (What could have been done more to his vineyard than he had done? Isa 5:4), and very loth he was to let things go to extremity; he reasons with himself (as Hos 11:9), How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? God would have done them good, but they were not qualified for it: "What shall I do unto thee? What else can I do but cast thee off, when I cannot in honour save thee?" Note, God never destroys sinners till he sees there is no other way with them. See here, 1. What their conduct was towards God: Their goodness, or kindness, was as the morning cloud. Some understand it of their kindness to themselves and their own souls, in their repentance; it is indeed mercy to ourselves to repent of our sins, but they soon retracted that kindness to themselves, undid it again, and wronged their own souls as much as ever. But it is rather to be taken for their piety and religion; what good appeared in them sometimes, it soon vanished and disappeared again, as the morning cloud and the early dew. Such was the goodness of Israel in Jehu's time, and of Judah in Hezekiah's and Josiah's time; it was soon gone. In time of drought the morning-cloud promises rain, and the early dew is some present refreshment to the earth; but the cloud is dispersed (and hypocrites are compared to clouds without water, Jde 1:12) and the dew does not soak into the ground, but is drawn back again into the air, and the earth is parched still. What shall he do with them? Shall he accept their goodness? No, for it passes away; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that which does not continue can scarcely be said to be done. Note, That goodness will never be either pleasing to God or profitable to ourselves which is as the morning cloud and the early dew. When men promise fair and do not perform, when they begin well in religion and do not hold on, when they leave their first love and their first works, or, though they do not quite cast off religion, are yet unsteady, uneven, and inconstant in it, then is their goodness as the morning cloud and the early dew. 2. What course God had taken with them (Hos 6:5): "Therefore, because they were so rough and ill-shapen, I have hewn them by the prophets, as timber or stone is hewn for use; I have slain them by the words of my mouth." What the prophets did was done by the word of God in their mouths, which never returned void. By it they thought themselves slain, were ready to say that the prophets killed them, or cut them to the heart when they dealt faithfully with them. (1.) The prophets hewed them by convictions of sin, endeavouring to cut off their transgressions from them. They were uneven in religion (Hos 6:4), therefore God hewed them. The hearts of sinners are not only as stone, but as rough stone, which requires a great deal of pains to bring it into shape, or as knotty timber, that is not squared without a great deal of difficulty; ministers' work is to hew them, and God by the minister hews them, for with the froward will he show himself froward. And there are those whom ministers must rebuke sharply; every word should cut, and though the chips fly in the face of the workman, though the reproved fly in the face of the reprover and reckon him an enemy because he tells the truth, yet he goes on with his work. (2.) They slew them by the denunciations of wrath, foretelling that they should be slain, as Ezekiel is said to destroy the city when he prophesied of the destruction of it, Eze 43:3. And God accomplished that which was foretold: "I have slain them by my judgments, according to the words of my mouth." Note, The word of God will be the death either of the sin or of the sinner, a savour either of life unto life or of death unto death. Some read it, "I have hewn the prophets, and slain them by the words of my mouth, that is, I have employed them in laborious service for the people's good, which has wasted their strength; they have spent themselves, and hews away all their spirits, in their work, and in hazardous service, which has cost many of them their lives." Note, Ministers are the tools which God makes use of in working upon people; and, though with many they labour in vain, yet God will reckon for the wearing out of his tools. (3.) God was hereby justified in the severest proceedings against them afterwards. His prophets had taken a great deal of pains with them, had admonished them of their sin and warned them of their danger, but the means used had not the desired effect; some good impressions perhaps were made for the present, but they wore off, and passed away as the morning cloud, and now they cannot charge God with severity if he bring upon them the miseries threatened. The prophet turns to him and acknowledges, Thy judgments are as the light that goes forth, evidently just and righteous. Note, Though sinners be not reclaimed by the pains that ministers take with them, yet thereby God will be justified when he speaks and clear when he judges. See Mat 11:17-19.

II. That they were not faithful to God's covenant with them, Hos 6:6, Hos 6:7. Here observe,

1.What the covenant was that God made with them, and upon what terms they should obtain his favour and be accepted of him (Hos 6:6): I desired mercy and not sacrifice (that is, rather than sacrifice), and insisted upon the knowledge of God more than upon burnt-offerings. Mercy here is the same word which in Hos 6:4 is rendered goodness - chesed - piety, sanctity; it is put for all practical religion; it is the same with charity in the New Testament, the reigning love of God and our neighbour, and this accompanied with and flowing from the knowledge of God, as he has revealed himself in his word, a firm belief that he is, and is the rewarder of those that diligently seek him, a good affection to divine things guided by a good judgment, which cannot but produce a very good conversation; this is that which God by his covenant requires, and not sacrifice and offering. This is fully explained, Jer 7:22, Jer 7:23. I spoke not to your fathers concerning burnt-offerings (that was the smallest of the matters I spoke to them of, and on which the least stress was laid), but this I said, Obey my voice, Mic 6:6-8. To love God and our neighbour is better than all burnt offering and sacrifice, Mar 12:33; Psa 51:16, Psa 51:17. Not but that sacrifice and offering were required, and to be paid, and had their use, and, when they were accompanied with mercy and the knowledge of God, were acceptable to him, but, without them, God regarded them not, he despised them, Isa 1:10, Isa 1:11. Perhaps this is mentioned here to show a difference between the God whom they deserted and the gods whom they went over to. The true God aimed at nothing but that they should be good men, and live good lives for their own good, and the ceremony of honouring him with sacrifices was one of the smallest matters of his law; whereas the false gods required that only; let their priests and altars be regaled with sacrifices and offerings, and the people might live as they listed. What fools were those then that left a God who aimed at giving his worshippers a new nature, for gods who aimed at nothing but making themselves a new name! It is mentioned likewise to show that God's controversy with them was not for the omission of sacrifices (I will not reprove thee for them, Psa 50:8), but because there was no justice, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God, among them (Hos 4:1), and to teach us all that the power of godliness is the main thing God looks at and requires, and without it the form of godliness is of no avail. Serious piety in the heart and life is the one thing needful, and, separate from that, the performances of devotion, though ever so plausible, ever so costly, are of no account. Our Saviour quotes this to show that moral duties are to be preferred before rituals whenever they come in competition, and to justify himself in eating with publicans and sinners, because it was in mercy to the souls of men, and in healing on the sabbath day, because it was in mercy to the bodies of men, to which the ceremony of singularity in eating and the sabbath-rest must give way, Mat 9:13; Mat 12:7.

2.How little they had regarded this covenant, though it was so well ordered in all things, though they, and not God, would be the gainers by it. See here what came of it.

(1.)In general, they broke with God, and proved unfaithful; there were good things committed to them to keep, the jewels of mercy and piety, and the knowledge of God, in the cabinet of sacrifice and burnt-offering, but they betrayed their trust, kept the cabinet, but pawned the jewels for the gratification of a base lust, and this is that for which God has justly a quarrel with them (Hos 6:7): They, like men, have transgressed the covenant, that covenant which God made with them; they have broken the conditions of it, and so forfeited the benefit of it. By casting off mercy and the knowledge of God, and other instances of disobedience, [1.] They had contracted the guilt of perjury and covenant-breaking; they were like men that transgress a covenant by which they had solemnly bound themselves, which is a thing that all the world cries out shame on; men that have done so deserve not again to be valued, or trusted, or dealt with. "There, in that thing, they have dealt treacherously against me; they have been perfidious, base, and false children, in whom is no faith, though I depended upon their being children that would not lie." [2.] In this they had but acted like themselves, like men, who are generally false and fickle, and in whose nature (their corrupt nature) it is to deal treacherously; all men are liars, and they are like the rest of that degenerate race, all gone aside, Psa 14:2, Psa 14:3. They have transgressed the covenant like men (like the Gentiles that transgressed the covenant of nature), like mean men (the word here used is sometimes put for men of low degree); they have dealt deceitfully, like base men that have no sense of honour. [3.] Herein they trod in the steps of our first parents: They, like Adam, have transgressed the covenant (so it might very well be read); as he transgressed the covenant of innocency, so they transgressed the covenant of grace, so treacherously, so foolishly; there in paradise he violated his engagements to God, and there in Canaan, another paradise, they violated their engagements. And by their treacherous dealing they, like Adam, have ruined themselves and theirs. Note, Sin is so much the worse the more there is in it of the similitude of Adam's transgression, Rom 5:14. [4.] Low thoughts of God and of his authority and favour were at the bottom of all this; for so some read it: They have transgressed the covenant, as of a man, as if it had been but the covenant of a man, that stood upon even ground with them, as if the commands of the covenant were but like those of a man like themselves, and the kindness conveyed by it no more valuable than that of a man. There is something sacred and binding in a man's covenant (as the apostle shows, Gal 3:15), but much more in the covenant of God, which yet they made small account of; and there in that covenant they dealt treacherously, promised fair, but performed nothing. Dealing treacherously with God is here called dealing treacherously against him, for it is both an affront and an opposition. Deserters are traitors, and will be so treated; the revolting heart is a rebellious heart.

(2.)Some particular instances of their treachery are here given: There they dealt treacherously, that is, in the places hereafter named [1.] Look on the other side Jordan, to the country which lay most exposed to the insults of the neighbouring nations, and where therefore the people were concerned to keep themselves under the divine protection, and yet there you will find the most daring provocations of the divine Majesty, Hos 6:8. Gilead, which lay in the lot of Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, was a city of the workers of iniquity. Wickedness was the trade that was driven there; the country was called Gilead, but it was all called a city, because they were all as it were incorporated in one society of rebels against God. Or (as most think) Ramoth Gilead is the city here meant, one of the three cities of refuge on the other side Jordan, and a Levites' city; the inhabitants of it, though of the sacred tribe, were workers of iniquity, contrived it, and practised it. Note, It is bad indeed when a Levites' city is a city of those that work iniquity, when those that are to preach good doctrine live bad lives. Particularly it is polluted with blood, as if that were a sin which the wicked Levites were in a special manner guilty of. In popish countries the clergy are observed to be the most bloody persecutors. Or, as it was a city of refuge, by abusing the power it had to judge of murders it became polluted with blood. They would, for a bribe, protect those that were guilty of wilful murder, whom they ought to have put to death, and would deliver those to the avenger of blood who were guilty but of chance-medley, if they were poor and had nothing to give them; and both these ways they were polluted with blood. Note, Blood defiles the land where it is shed, and where no inquisition is made or no vengeance taken for it. See how the best institutions, that are ever so well designed to keep the balance even between justice and mercy, are capable of being abused and perverted to the manifest prejudice and violation of both. [2.] Look among those whose business it was to minister in holy things, and they were as bad as the worst and as vile as the vilest (Hos 6:9): The company of priests are so, not here and there one that is the scandal of his order, but the whole order and body of them, the priests go all one way by consent, with one shoulder (as the word is), one and all; and they make one another worse, more daring, and fierce, and impudent, in sin, more crafty and more cruel. A company of priests will say and do that in conspiracy which none of them would dare to say or do singly. The companies of priests were as troops of robbers, as banditti, or gangs of highwaymen, that cut men's throats to get their money. First, They were cruel and blood-thirsty. They murder those that they have a pique against, or that stand in their way; nothing less will satisfy them. Secondly, They were cunning. They laid wait for men, that they might have a fair opportunity to compass their mischievous malicious designs; thus the company of priests laid wait for Christ to take him, saying, Not on the feast-day. Thirdly, They were concurring as one man: They murder in the way; in the highway, where travellers should be safe, there they murder by consent, aiding and abetting one another in it. See how unanimous wicked people are in doing mischief; and should not good people be so then in doing good? They murder in the way to Shechem (so the margin reads it, as a proper name) such as were going to Jerusalem (for that way Shechem lay) to worship. Or in the way to Shechem (some think) means in the same manner that their father Levi, with Simeon his brother, murdered the Shechemites (Gen. 34), by fraud and deceit; and some understand it of their destroying the souls of men by drawing them to sin. Fourthly, They did it with contrivance: They commit lewdness; the word signifies such wickedness as is committed with deliberation, and of malice prepense, as we say. The more there is of device and design in sin the worse it is. [3.] Look into the body of the people, take a view of the whole house of Israel, and they are all alike (Hos 6:10): I have seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel, and, though it be ever so artfully managed, God discovers it, and will discover it to them; and who can deny that which God himself says that he has seen? There is the whoredom of Ephraim, both corporal and spiritual whoredom; there it is too plain to be denied. Note, The sin of sinners, especially sinners of the house of Israel, has enough in it to make them tremble, for it is a horrible thing, it is amazing, and it is threatening, enough to make them blush, for Israel is thereby defiled and rendered odious in the sight of God. [4.] Look into Judah, and you find them sharing with Israel (Hos 6:11): Also, O Judah! he has set a harvest for thee; thou must be reckoned with as well as Ephraim; thou art ripe for destruction too, and the time, even the set time, of thy destruction is hastening on, when thou that hast ploughed iniquity, and sown wickedness, shalt reap the same. The general judgment is compared to a harvest (Mat 13:39), so are particular judgments, Joe 3:13; Rev 14:15. I have appointed a time to call thee to account, even when I returned the captivity of my people, that is, when those captives of Judah which were taken by the men of Israel were restored, in obedience to the command of God sent them by Oded the prophet, Ch2 28:8-15. When God spared them that time he set them a harvest, that is, he designed to reckon with them another time for all together. Note, Preservations from present judgments, if a good use be not made of them, are but reservations for greater judgments.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–11. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Hosea 6:9
"The participation of the priests on the road of those going to kill from Shechem: for they have committed a crime." LXX: "The priests have hidden" "the way of the Lord and killed Shechem: for they have committed iniquity." Symmachus interpreted this passage as: "The association of priests were killing Shechem on the road:" Theodotion in this way, "The priests hid the way, they killed from behind:" Aquila, "The participation of the priests on the road were killing shoulders:" when we sought the understanding of these versions in accordance with the story from the Hebrew, it was presented to us as follows: The priests of Bethel, or rather the fanatics of Bethaven, during the times of Passover and Pentecost, as well as Scenopegiae, when it was necessary to go to Jerusalem through Sichem, which is now called Neapolis, placed robbers on the road who would lay in wait for those who were traveling, so that they would worship the golden calves in Dan and Bethaven more than in Jerusalem and in the temple of God. But what he says: "Participation and partnership of priests", signifies their conspiracy and agreement for an evil purpose. But if we read it, as we have interpreted it, "partaker of the priests", he says, it refers to Gilead, which works with an idol; it has also been saturated with blood, which followed the impiety of the priests, and is free of plundering and bloody deeds. If they have said this, we must say, let us cut off heretics so that we do not proceed from Shechem, that is, from good works, to Jerusalem, that is, to the Church. These are like the jaws of bandits, and they kill those who wish to proceed through the way of truth in this age. Sichem is interpreted as "shoulders," that is, shoulders: we understand the work on the shoulders, and all false priests hide the way, and kill men with evil deeds so that they do not reach Jerusalem. But what the shoulder work signifies is shown by: "Put your heart on your shoulder" (Gen. IV, 9, 15), that is, what you understand, turn into actions. And of Issachar we read, that he placed his shoulder to work, and was a farmer.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hosea 6:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.